Abstract
The geo-heritage of the Saoura Valley in Southwest Algeria is particularly rich and of undeniable scientific value for studying the Palaeozoic, Neogene and Quaternary strata inherited from the Ougarta chain. Although Algeria has always been highly ranked among the most fascinating geodiversity countries, its geological heritage has been seldom described and presented to the African and international community. Subsequently its geodiversity and geo-resources are under-recognized. The Saoura Valley is renowned for its gorgeous geological, oasian and geomorphological landscapes, as well as for its archaeological wealth. In the present paper, we intend to briefly describe the main lithostratigraphic units of the Devonian series exposed in the Saoura Valley and to give an overview of the Quaternary outcrops. Several geo-sites were observed and inventoried, showing a highly significative scientific value and also some remarkable educational and tourism potential as evidenced by their huge historical, archaeological, geological, and cultural heritage. Additionally, the Saoura Valley displays pedagogical geo-sites of cardinal interest for different geological disciplines, among which are stratigraphy, palaeontology, ichnology, geomorphology, geodynamics, structural geology, and ecology, all reflecting the diversified geological record of the area. Besides its aesthetic value, the rich geodiversity of the Saoura Valley displays an obvious scientific and touristic interest. According to the obtained numerical scores using recent quantitative assessment methodology, the Saoura Valley is very promising and can be considered a first-order destination since geo-sites therein score quite a high attraction potential and recreational value for tourism development. These scores ought to be treated with great care by the authorities to effectively promote tourism and to accordingly enhance the local socio-economic development in this remote area. Furthermore, the Saoura Valley area deserves more attention and requires geo-conservation programs and protection strategies right away to make sure that these geo-resources will be preserved for future generations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The geological sites, also known as geo-heritage sites, refer to the valuable geomorphological features of the Earth: they comprise unique geological phenomena both considered worthy of protection, conservation and transmission to the future generations, and regarded very valuable to scientists, educators and tourists (Reynard et al. 2009; Martin 2014; Gray 2018; Coratza and Hobléa 2018; Abdel Maksoud et al. 2019). Geo-heritage sites include soil and rock formations, fossil assemblages, landforms and landscapes, and the impact of geomorphological processes on their modification (Cresswell and Semeniuk 2018). They may also refer to regionally or globally referenced sections, outcrops or locations that have preserved geological features providing information about Earth’s evolution or the history of Earth sciences and that can be used for research, education and also geo-touristic attraction (Reynard and Brilha 2018; Bentivenga et al. 2019; Chauhan et al. 2021). Recognition of geological heritage sites has been accelerating during the last few decades (e.g., Zagorchev and Nakov 1998; Osborne 2000; Moufti and Németh 2013; dos Santos et al. 2016; Reynard and Brilha 2018; Bentivenga et al. 2019; Lahmidi et al. 2020; Bhosale et al. 2021; Chauhan et al. 2021; Cameron 2022; Chavan et al. 2022; Joshi et al. 2022; Mir et al. 2023; Bhat et al. 2023; Si Mhamdi et al. 2023; Thakkar et al. 2023; among others). Subsequently, there has been a lot of attention paid to the quantitative and qualitative approaches for categorizing and inventorying the diversity of geo-heritage sites because of their widespread use, growing knowledge and international significance (Dowling 2010; Gray 2011; Farsani et al. 2012; Hose and Vasiljevic 2012; Ollier 2012). Considering the sole African continent, since 2006, the scientific community has been paying more attention to and interest in the inventory, protection, classification, and valorization of the African geological heritage (Marok 2023). This interest appeared to the international community in the last decade through several publications from different countries, to name but a few: Morocco (Errami et al. 2013), Angola (Tavares et al. 2015), Egypt (Sallam et al. 2018), Cameroon (Henriques and Neto 2019), Algeria (Marok 2021), and South Africa (Matshusa et al. 2021). As a result, the paradigm of African geo-parks materialized with the creation of the Ngorongoro Lengai National Park in Tanzania and the M’Goun National Park in Morocco, respectively.
On the other hand, the term “geo-site” refers to a location with significant geological or geomorphological features that should be preserved or are already protected (e.g., Panizza and Piacente 1993; Wimbledon et al. 1995; Wimbledon 1996; Panizza 2001; Reynard 2004). It provides an understanding of both the internal and external geological phenomena prevailing on Earth (Chauhan et al. 2023). According to these authors, investigation of geo-sites is crucial for increasing public understanding of the significance of preserving and enhancing the nation’s geological heritage. However, during the early history of geology and palaeontology, conservation of geological sites and materials was rarely an issue for the ‘ever’ developing science, as new areas with “fresh” fossil assemblages were regularly discovered (Page 2018). Both palaeontological and geological sites are now receiving a lot of attention worldwide, especially with the rising use of palaeontological sites in education and tourism, which has focused ever-growing attention in the media (Haste 1993; Torrens 1993). As a result, conservation schemes such as Geo-parks and Paleo-parks, have boosted the identification and protection of such sites (Lipps 2009). In contrast, research and studies on the assessment and inventory of geo-heritage sites, particularly palaeontological ones, in Algeria are still scarce compared to those managed in other nations worldwide (e.g., Chabou et al. 2015; Bendaoud et al. 2015; Bessedik et al. 2022; Nedjari 2023; Marok 2023). However, considering Algeria’s geological diversity, it is now time and crucial to spot, investigate and evaluate quite a number of geological heritage sites. To date, only a few papers have already highlighted the importance and vulnerability of some Algerian geo-heritage sites. For instance, Chabou et al. (2015) inventoried several dinosaur track geo-sites, most of which are located in the Saharan Atlas. These authors highlighted the danger and dramatic decay facing this invaluable world’s geological heritage and proposed subsequently several geo-conservation measures, including the creation of geo-parks to protect and preserve them.
Located in southwestern Algeria, the Saoura Valley (Ougarta Range) is characterized by high geodiversity and a rich geological heritage. The Devonian and Quaternary outcrops in this region consist in a diverse geological heritage still not well-known to the public, despite several MSc and PhD thesis and published scientific papers about its geology, particularly the palaeontological, ichnological and sedimentological studies (e.g., Ouali Mehadji 2004; Benachour 2011; Bendella 2012; Besseghier 2014; Bouchemla 2021). It does not yet benefit from conservation and valorization strategies or even from a mere assessment of these geo-sites. This paper presents the first multi-disciplinary geo-heritage inventory list of the Ougarta Range (Algerian Sahara), particularly from the Saoura Valley, since the works of Bendaoud et al. (2015) and Nedjari (2023) only focused the famous bioclastic limestone bar, so-called ‘Bar A = Chinese Wall’, well known for their giant Orthoceras content in the Marhouma section (Saoura Valley). The paper aims to highlight and assess the scientific, educational, cultural, and touristic values of the Saoura Valley, followed by an assessment of its potential within the scope of geo-tourism and geo-education.
Geological Setting
The Ougarta Basin is a deep intra-cratonic basin located in southwestern Algeria and considered as part of the north-western margin of the Sahara platform. Its sedimentary infill is about 5,000 m-thick, ranging in age from the Precambrian to the Late Devonian (Strunian), with scarce Cenozoic accumulations (Fabre 2005). The basin is 450 km-long and 200 km-wide, subdivided following a NW-SE direction into two ranges separated by the Erg Er Raoui: the Saoura Range to the NE and the Daoura Range to the SW (Fig. 1B). These ranges display the same morphological trend as that of the Appalachians (Conrad et al. 1970; Aït Kaci 1990). The Ougarta Range, including the Saoura and Daoura Ranges, is bounded by the Guir Hamada to the north, the Great Western Erg (erg = sand sea) to the northeast, the Kem-Kem Plateau to the northwest, and by the Erg Chech and the Erg Iguidi to the southwest (Fig. 1B). It is considered as an extension of the Moroccan Anti-Atlas to the northwest and the Touareg shield to the south. The Precambrian is essentially formed by volcanic (rhyolite) and volcano-sedimentary rocks and considered as the basement of a very thick Palaeozoic sedimentary cover (Chikhaoui 1974). This latter ranges from the Cambrian to the Strunian, predominantly composed of terrigenous and carbonate deposits unconformably overlying the Precambrian (Fig. 1C). The Palaeozoic series is affected by the Hercynian orogeny and presents a structural direction N120°E, so-called Ougartian.
In the Saoura Range, the Cambro-Ordovician strata build anticlines, separated by Silurian-Devonian synclines (Menchikoff 1930; Donzeau 1983; Boumendjel et al. 1997; Fabre 2005). The synclines are dominated, however, by 3,000 m-thick Devonian strata (Fabre 2005), largely widespread and exposed through dissymmetric ridges (cuestas), and bounded by fluvial, lacustrine and aeolian deposits of Miocene, Pliocene and Quaternary ages (Bouchemla et al. 2021). The Lower Devonian is predominantly composed of mixed siliciclastic-carbonate deposits where storm-influenced shallow marine conditions prevailed. The Middle Devonian is represented by marl-limestone alternations and corresponds to a transgressive deposition covering vast areas of the Saharan platform during the Middle Devonian (e.g., Bouchemla et al. 2021). The Upper Devonian strata start with carbonate deposits, turn upwards into clay-fine- to medium-grained sandstone alternations, showing several types of soft-sediment deformation structures, especially at the top of the series. The Neogene formations lie on the Palaeozoic series of the Guir Hamada (a stony plateau forming the so called reg) with an angular unconformity.
Marhouma Section (or “Km 30” Reference Section) ∼ 1,500 m
The regionally referenced section of the Devonian outcrops in the Ougarta Basin is located about 30 km southeast of the town of Beni Abbes, by the side of the national road RN°6 connecting Bechar to Adrar, in a well-known sector called “Marhouma section” or “Km 30 section”. In this area, the Devonian, outcropping on both sides of the road, is represented by a famous and remarkable metric limestone bar commonly called “Chinese Wall’’ (= ‘Muraille de Chine’ in the francophonic literature).
The Devonian mixed siliciclastic-carbonate succession overlies the Silurian shales without any apparent lithological discontinuity (Menchikoff 1933). The Silurian–Devonian boundary had been studied in detail by Legrand (1977, 1985), based on graptolites. The presence of Monograptus uniformus uniformus characterizes the base of the Devonian.
The Devonian series of the Marhouma section can be subdivided into seven formal lithostratigraphic units (Legrand 1962, 1977; Boumendjel et al. 1997; Fig. 2A), from base to top:
Zeimlet Formation (120 m)
It consists of an alternation of sandy clays with micaceous sandstone and bioclastic limestone beds. It is dated as Lower Lochkovian thanks to the appearance of Monograptus uniformus uniformus (Legrand 1962). The age was confirmed later by Boumendjel and Paris (1997), based on chitinozoans (Eisenackitina bohemica Zone) and trilobites (Warburgella rugulosa maura and Acastella jacquemonti).
Saheb El Djir Formation (220 m)
It is represented by a thick claystone deposit intercalated with a few decimetric, bioclastic limestone beds. The formation is assigned to the Lower-Upper Lochkovian due to the presence of basal Devonian graptolite index taxon Monograptus uniformus uniformus and M. hercynicus (Legrand 1967, 1977), brachiopods (Lanceomyonia borealiformis; Brice 1997), trilobites (Acastella levis; Morzadec 1997), and chitinozoans (Eisenackitina bohemica; Boumendjel and Paris 1997).
Dkhissa Formation (320 m)
This formation is characterized by an alternation of clay and sandstone with occasional lenticular, bioclastic limestone intercalations (Fig. 2B). It is subdivided into three informal members: the first two units being attributed to the Upper Lochkovian (Legrand 1967), whereas the last one is dated to the Pragian (Le Maître 1952). The age assignment of this formation is based on chitinozoans (Boumendjel and Paris 1997), brachiopods (e.g., Lanceoyomyonia occidentalis; Brice 1997), trilobites (e.g., Protacanthina robusticostata; Morzadec 1997), and tabulate corals (Cleistopora geometrica; Plusquellec 1997).
Teferguenite Formation (250 m)
It ranges from the base of the so-called limestone bar “A” to the base of the ‘coralligenous level’ (Le Maître 1952), also known as the bed with a diversified benthonic fauna (DBF, = “FBV”) (Ouali Mehadji 2004). The Teferguenite Formation is subdivided into two members:
-
The lower member (Lower Emsian; Le Maître 1952; Legrand 1967; Fabre 1976) consists of three blueish to greyish, metric, bioclastic limestone beds rich in Orthoceras (so-called bars A, B and C, respectively) of pluri-kilometric lateral extent (Fig. 2C), intercalated with two greenish, clay-dominated depressions several tens of metres thick.
-
The upper member (Upper Emsian; Boumendjel et al. 1997) is characterized by an alternation of greenish clays with fine-grained, silty limestone beds. Sandstone beds display several sedimentary structures and diverse bioturbations.
Chefar El Ahmar Formation (155 m)
This carbonate-dominated stratigraphic unit starts at the base of the upper Emsian coralligenous level (Le Maître 1952; Göddertz 1987) and ends up with ‘griotte’ limestone facies assigned to the Frasnian Ia-Ib (Petter 1959, 1960; Casier 1982; Boumendjel et al. 1997). It can be subdivided into three informal members (Bouchemla et al. 2021):
The lower member corresponds to an irregular alternation of greenish clays and greyish-to-blueish, bioclastic to clayey limestone beds yielding rich benthonic fauna (Table 1) of late Emsian age (Le Maître 1952; Göddertz 1987);
The middle member consists of an alternation of greenish to dark grey marls and centimetric to decimetric limestone beds interrupted by some silt- and sandstone levels. The member is capped by a dark grey, 50 m-thick, marl deposit. It is assigned to the Eifelian–Lower Frasnian (Göddertz 1987; Maillet et al. 2013);
The upper member consists of a slumped alternation of greenish or reddish, laminated marl, and red, nodular to pseudo-nodular, strongly bioturbated, ammonoid-rich, calcareous beds. The deposits are referred to the griotte limestone facies assigned to the Frasnian Ia-Ib (Petter 1959, 1960; Casier 1982; Boumendjel et al. 1997).
Marhouma Claystone Formation (370 m)
This formation is divided into three members (Abbache et al. 2019): The lower clayey member (Famennian II) corresponds to 115 m-thick clays interbedded with decimetric calcareous spheroids yielding brachiopods (Mottequin et al. 2015) and small pyritic ammonoids (Allaire et al. 2016; unpublished data). The middle limestone member (Famennian III, IV, V, and base of VI) consists of 70 m-thick, griotte limestone beds (Fig. 2D). The upper clayey-sandstone member (Famennian VI, Strunian) corresponds to an irregular alternation of about 185 m-thick between greenish clays and centimetric to decimetric, fine- to medium-grained sandstone beds (Fig. 2E). The age of this member is dated as late Fammenian and is inferred to correlate with Zone II with Cheiloceras to Zone VI with Wocklumeria (Abbache et al. 2019).
Ouarourout Sandstone Formation (120 m)
This formation builds the whole relief of the Akhal Mountain and is mostly represented by massive sandstones and thin clayey interbeds (Fig. 2F). The Ouarourout Sandstone Formation is subdivided into two members (Ouali Mehadji et al. 2012): a basal member consisting of turbidites marred by catastrophic event indices, and a second, upper member represented by sandstones with channels and cross-bedding displaying Liesegang rings at the top. This formation is attributed to the late Famennian (Zone VI), which is confirmed by the presence of the ammonoid Wocklumeria at the base of the formation in its type locality (Petter 1959, 1960; Malti 2012).
The Quaternary of the Saoura Valley
The Quaternary stratigraphy of the Saoura Valley is dominated by fluvial sequences in an arid desert environment. The Algerian Sahara is characterized by several fossil valleys of Quaternary age. Among them, the Saoura Valley is the one that has preserved life as best as possible and was once described as a fossil ‘River Nile’ (Gautier and Larnaude 1921). During the Quaternary, the Saoura Valley had brought a large quantity of sediments and strongly eroded the overflowed outcropping exposures outcrops (Capot-Rey 1965) from the Igli oasis over a distance exceeding 400 km into the Sahara up to the Timmoudi Sebkha, known as its main mouth (Fig. 3). The Saoura Valley flows straight through, in a deep and clean itinerary, from the Igli oasis to the Foum El Kheneg area, close to some successive agglomerations and oases (i.e., Ouarourout, Beni Abbes, Marhouma, Bechri, Temtert, Idigh, Anfal, Agdal, etc.), located on its left bank and the western edge of the Great Western Erg. Water in these oases is heavily dependent on the Saoura Valley and subsequently constitutes both a genuine lifeline of oases and a watershed (Fig. 4A).
During the drought period, the Saoura Valley reveals various interesting sedimentary structures generated by the high hydrodynamics of the recorded flooding season. Erosional wind action on sedimentary bodies has revealed noteworthy exposures and nice outcrops, thus facilitating direct observation of several structures, including ripple marks (symmetrical and asymmetrical ripples), obstacle marks, climbing ripples, horizontal- and cross-laminations, rill- and crescent marks, as well as evidence of subaerial emergence (raindrop impressions and mud cracks) (Fig. 4B-E). Moreover, some other structures such as sole marks, convolute lamination, imbricated clasts, and graded bedding (normally and/or reversely graded), could also be observed.
Moreover, modern traces are quite abundant across the valley, mainly observed on the top surface of mud deposits, generally located near standing water reservoirs (Nemra 2013). Bioturbation is roughly represented by root structures and repichnial traces produced mainly by terrestrial organisms (e.g., birds, reptiles, sand foxes, and beetles). These observed traces are usually associated with subaerial emergence structures (i.e., desiccation cracks and raindrop impressions). Other traces and tracks produced by the same animals are observed on dune sands (Fig. 5), scattered all over the valley as well as the Marhouma area. However, their preservation is nearly impossible since they quickly fade from the constant movement of sand dunes by wind, which is the main agent of sand movement in this dry climate.
The association of both biogenic and sedimentary structures recorded in the Saoura Valley could be easily observed in the sedimentary record (i.e., old geologic series) and, consequently, should be considered of great use to geologists seeking to identify the fluvial depositional environment.
Methodology
The Saoura Valley has been the subject of several geological fieldwork projects in the last decades by different universities and researchers, mostly within the scope of research and educational purposes. The site is well-known for its geodiversity and wealth of geo-resources, reflecting its scientific, geo-educational and geo-touristic worth. Unfortunately, this site is left unpresented to the national, African and international communities as a geo-heritage, despite the numerous international research papers revealing its scientific importance. Thus, only geodiversity elements with scientific value recognized by the national and/or international scientific communities will be considered as geo-heritage (Brilha 2016). The term geo-site is used for an in situ geo-heritage element. The present study aims to present and extol further on the importance of the Saoura Valley as a genuine geo-heritage issue, regarding its scientific value as well as its potential use in both education and tourism.
In the present work, the selected Saoura Valley site is evaluated using the quantitative method proposed by Brilha (2016). The purpose of such a method is to assess the scientific value (SV) of the geo-site, followed by an assessment of its potential to be used in geo-education (PEU) and/or geo-tourism (PTU). First, the scientific value is evaluated using seven criteria to distinguish the geo-site with the highest scientific value, drawn up in maximum 28 points, each criterion being given a score of 0, 1, 2, or 4. Depending on the achieved score, each criterion is weighted in percentage. The final scientific value is the weighted average of the seven criteria. On the other hand, the second quantitative evaluation method is used to evaluate the potential educational use (PEU) and the touristic use (PTU) of the site. The first one is assessed according to 12 criteria, whereas the second one is evaluated according to 13 criteria (Brilha 2016). Both the PEU and the PTU share 10 common criteria, while each one display only a couple of specific criteria. In this way, the didactic potential and geological diversity are reserved for the PEU, whereas the interpretative potential, economic level and proximity of recreational areas are specific to the PTU. Similarly, each criterion is assessed from 0 to 4 points and weighted in percentage accordingly. The assessment of the educational and touristic values is the weighted average of these scores. The risk of degradation is related to the vulnerability and fragility of the site, as well as to other factors such as the accessibility of the site and its proximity to human activities (Fuertes-Gutiérrez and Fernández-Martínez 2012; Brilha 2016).
Scientific Interest of the Saoura Valley
Palaeontological Interest
The Devonian deposits of the Saoura Valley (e.g., Marhouma (Km 30) reference section, Ougarta Range) have revealed an outstanding scientific value since they have been the subject of several first-order stratigraphic and palaeontological studies, especially those of Menchikoff (1930, 1933, 1936), Le Maître (1952), Alimen et al. (1952), Petter (1959), Casier (1985), Göddertz (1987), Fabre (1976, 2005), Boumendjel et al. (1997), and Paris et al. (1997). In this area, the lower member (Upper Praguian to Lower Emsian) of the Teferguenite Formation consists of three bioclastic calcareous beds (namely bars “A”, “B” and “C”) of pluri-kilometric lateral extent, rich in giant orthoceratids (Fig. 2C). The beds are considered as an important stratigraphic landmark in the Saharan platform and are currently protected (Nedjari 2023). Above, the Upper Emsian-Frasnian Ib strata of the Chefar El Ahmar Formation have been the subject of several palaeontological and biostratigraphic studies, most of which focused on the highly fossiliferous basal part of this formation, which was named “banc coralligène” (= ‘coralligenous bed’) by Le Maître (1952) and more recently redefined as a major level with a diversified benthonic fauna (DBF, = “FBV”) by Ouali Mehadji et al. (2004). Since the discovery of this highly fossiliferous deposit, the respective fossil groups (crinoidal stems, corals, brachiopods, trilobites, bryozoans, bivalves, gastropods, orthoceratids, and goniatites) (Figs. 6 and 7) have led to numerous studies over the last decade (e.g., Ouali Mehadji et al. 2004; Besseghier 2014; Khaldi et al. 2015; and many others in progress). Above this deposit, the Eifelian-Givetian strata have also been studied in detail thanks to diversified ostracod and conodont assemblages (Maillet et al. 2013; Tandjaoui-Arif 2014). The succession is characterized by a moderate diversity of trace fossils with several tentaculite-bearing beds, considered as index levels in the Marhouma section (Fig. 7H). Moreover, red nodular limestones (i.e., ‘griotte’ facies) characterize the Upper Devonian (Famennian) Marhouma Claystone Formation and are rich in ammonoids (Allaire et al. 2020), constituting an important part of the Devonian marine macro-invertebrates in North Africa. The availability of palaeontological data from the Devonian succession in the Marhouma section provides an insight into the palaeo-biological and palaeo-ambiental features of the Devonian palaeo-ecosystem, and helps researchers make comparison with other Devonian localities from the Gondwana supercontinent. Consequently, such a synergistic partnership enhances our general understanding of the palaeo-biogeography of this area within the northern Gondwana passive margin. Thus, it attracted researchers from different countries interested in studying Devonian fossiliferous deposits, thus greatly enhancing its scientific value, especially from a palaeontological point of view.
Stratigraphical Interest
The Devonian succession of the Marhouma section is characterized by almost continuous outcrops exposed over the whole site through hills, domes, rivers, and road cuts. Consequently, the section is considered a great site for applying the principles of stratigraphy (e.g., the principle of lateral continuity and correlation) for educational purposes due to stratal arrangement (with or without any stratigraphic and sedimentary discontinuities). Moreover, regarding the high occurrence of sedimentary figures and structures in the recent sediments of the Saoura Valley, the principle of uniformitarism can be easily applied and helps teacherspassing on knowledge to geology students since the Marhouma section is a great pedagogical site to teach different disciplines of sedimentary geology. On the other hand, the well-preserved index fossils (micro- and macrofauna) in these deposits, greatly help researchers to define with certainty the stratigraphic boundaries between the respective formations and the Devonian stages. Therefore, the Marhouma reference section for the Devonian outcrops should be considered a strategic milestone for stratigraphic geo-sites of both scientific and educational relevance based on its worth, accessibility and representativeness.
Ichnological Interest
Current research identified the Marhouma (Km 30) section (Saoura Valley) as an important ichno-site in the whole Ougarta Range, given the extreme abundance of trace fossils within the Devonian strata, especially from the Praguian upwards. Trace fossils are indeed very common in the Phanerozoic of Algeria and the number of descriptive studies from numerous continental and marine settings has steadily increased over the last decade, especially the very last couple of years (e.g., Mekki et al. 2023; Benyoucef and Bouchemla 2023; Bouchemla et al. 2020, 2023). Nevertheless, only a few studies have been dedicated to Devonian ichnofossils so far (Bendella and Ouali Mehadji 2015; Bouchemla et al. 2021; Bendella et al. 2022).
The present ichno-site is easily accessible from the national road RN°6. The sediments include a moderate to high diversity of trace fossils preserved in fine- to medium-grained sandstone and limestone deposits through five formations (i.e., the Dkhissa, Teferguenite, Chefar El Ahmar, Marhouma Claystone, and the Ouarourout Sandstone, respectively). Ichnological analysis of these formations indicates a deepening trend from foreshore (Dkhissa Formation) to mid-deep-sea-fan settings (Marhouma Claystone Formation), whereas the Ouarourout Sandstone Formation corresponds to a regressive trend (Bendella and Ouali Mehadji 2015). Apart from the Dkhissa Formation, whose ichnological study is still in progress, the other formations are now studied in detail. The ichnological data of the Teferguenite Formation evidence a moderate to high diversity of trace fossils (Fig. 8). In contrast, the Upper Emsian to Frasnian Ib strata of the Chefar El Ahmar Formation display low to moderate diversity of trace fossil assemblages, among which Zoophycos specimens are the most common elements (Bouchemla et al. 2021). The upper Famennian deposits consist of the two uppermost formations of the Marhouma section, i.e., the Marhouma Claystone Formation and the overlying Ouarourout Sandstone Formation. The former is characterized by a wide variety of deep-sea trace fossils (Fig. 9).
In the considered area, the abundance of trace fossils led researchers to use several ichnological concepts (e.g., the concept of ichnofabric) and to better understand the close interaction between organisms and substrates, subsequently leading to the paradigm of bioturbated textures (see Bouchemla et al. 2021). Furthermore, trace fossil records disclose the respective behaviours and ecological conditions of their producers, their individual and group activities, and their evolutionary trends and taphonomic windows, all these contribute to our understanding of the evolution of life and Earth’s history (Chauhan and Desai 2023). Moreover, the availability of neo-ichnological data through the Saoura Valley contribute to help researchers in identifying the possible trace makers in the recent fluvial system and in applying knowledge acquired from current trace makers (sometimes obtained from ichnological experiments), to fossil records, using the uniformitarian issues for both scientific and educational purposes.
Geomorphological Interest
The geomorphological value of the Saoura Valley is linked to the desert landforms visible in this area, including sand dunes, plains holding oases and stony plateaus (reg and hamada) reflecting the dry climate of the region (Fig. 10). Likewise, many desert sites (e.g., Lahmidi et al. 2020) and sceneries in the Saoura Valley display a gloomy appearance from the desert patina. Furthermore, it is considered a great field laboratory to test and document all the wind processes from the aeolian transport, through wind erosion and finally to sandy creeping. However, the process of sandy creeping is a real issue for site conservation: it requires prompt actions to protect the area, especially around the town of Beni Abbes, built just next to the giant sand dunes. Furthermore, these giant sand dunes jeopardize the self-sufficient agriculture of the local population established along the course of the Saoura flowing next to these giant sand dunes. However, the sand dunes are one of the main landforms in the area. They belong to the Great Western Erg (spanning over an area of 80,000 km2), and form a true sandy sea where the dune height ranges from a few dozen metres to over 300 m (Bendaoud et al. 2015). In the last decades, these dunes have become a popular touristic destination for camping and sand skiing, turning this area into a first-order spot for tourism but also for studying geomorphological processes and other environmental phenomena.
Archaeological Interest
The Beni Abbes province yields many Neolithic prehistoric heritage sites such as Zghamra, Tlya, Anfidh, Taghit, Ougarta, and Marhouma, where rock engraving sites are evidence of a human dwelling several thousand years old. The rock engraving site of Marhouma is located on the banks of the Saoura Valley, some 18 km southeast of the town of Beni Abbes, at the gateway to the Great Western Erg. It was discovered in 1951 by Captain Villalonga (a French military officer). According to Alimen (1954), the rupestrian engravings are reported to three phases: (1) naturalistic, with punctuated lines presenting mainly bovids in absolute profile; (2) dotted entirely with ostrich dominance, but orants are the most frequent; and (3) in a faint line showing mainly caballins. They would be associated with hunting and fertility rites (Seddiki 2013). The Marhouma prehistoric site is relatively rich in human figures and does not include any engravings with heavily incised lines like the Taghit site (Fig. 11). Among the dotted figures, Alimen (1954) recorded a total of 20 engravings, including 11 men, 3 women and 6 enigmatic figures, suggesting as much a woman as an ostrich. In the Beni Abbes province, the Marhouma prehistoric site, among others, displays the evolution of the lithic industry and the lifestyle of Neolithic men occupying southwestern Algeria during the third phase of the Quaternary, as the last prehistoric period (Seddiki 2013). The diversity and large number of Neolithic evidence are direct testimonials of the large number of people who had been living on the banks of valleys and lakes that are now dry.
The Neolithic of the Sahara constitutes a very interesting and impressive issue for researchers in prehistory, contributing to understanding the human prehistory in Algeria and worldwide through the numerous foundations for civilization, such as advanced industry, agriculture, animal husbandry, pottery, construction, engravings, art, and means of transport, except for the use of metals, writing and the constitution of the state (Alimen et al. 1952; Seddiki 2013).
Geo-Heritage Significance and Geo-Touristic Aspect of the Saoura Valley Geo-Sites
The Devonian outcrops of the Saoura Valley are of great value compared to other areas within the Ougarta Basin or any other basins. This value is even greater since the outcrops of the respective exposed lithostratigraphic units (without any major discontinuities or gaps) are continuous and the quality of fossil preservation is good. In contrast to other areas, the site accessibility and its proximity to a civilized place (town of Beni Abbes) make it a favourite destination for scientists and geology students, as well as for amateurs and tourists. Moreover, one of the original site specificities making it unique, is the availability of actual fluvial deposits along the Saoura Valley. These deposits are rich in modern traces and show diverse sedimentary structures at different scales, which can be easily compared to the fossil ones visible in the Devonian outcrops.
As many touristic sites, the Saoura Valley area is served by several roads, facilitating the entry and exit of people from all around Algeria or even from abroad (especially with the opening of an airfield in the town of Beni Abbes). Besides enhancing freight and passenger transport in the area, this new transportation facility is designed as an additional asset for the development of tourist activities in a region with such an invaluable world-renowned touristic potential. Geo-tourism promotion often combines good quality of infrastructures and interactive interpretation as the appropriate forms of local economic development through community involvement (Farsani et al. 2011; Margiotta and Sansò 2014).
Across the Saoura Valley, several geo-sites with high touristic attractions can be observed; their locations, coordinates and features as touristic sites are summarized in Table 2. These geo-sites will surely provide a gorgeous destination for the tourists’ sake and any other recreational activities (e.g., sand skiing and camping). These sites are especially noteworthy for their geodiversity and archaeological heritage, as shown by their great historical, archaeological, geological, and cultural heritage. Moreover, these geo-sites are located in safe areas (i.e., no risky outcrops), served by good-quality itineraries and trails with low traffic, allowing rapid transfers between them. These spots can be developed very easily for geo-educational enhancement and holiday destinations, since these sites are already quite popular. Additionally, the surrounding areas display many diverse scenic beauties in a clean, fresh and healthy environment like many other spectacular places along the Saoura Valley (e.g., oases and palm groves) that can be easily accessed either within walking distance or by means of transport.
Discussion
Scientific Value Assessment
The assessment results show that the studied geo-sites indicate a high scientific value, with a score up to 80% (Table 3). The high scientific value directly reflects the diverse and numerous geological characteristics of these geo-sites and one of the most important evidences of the Devonian biodiversity as a major element for understanding the rise and evolution of marine life during this period of Earth’s history. For instance, the Marhouma (Km 30) geo-site displays several Zoophycos-bearing levels occurring in the Middle Devonian deposits (Bouchemla et al. 2021). Therefore, these Devonian Zoophycos have been considered as the first bloom of this trace maker during the Palaeozoic and a key to understanding its environmental and morphological evolutionary trend through the Phanerozoic. Actually, several aspects contribute significantly to the scientific value of a given geo-site, including their meaning in growing geoscience knowledge and enhancing site preservation for future research. In such a context, the Saoura Valley is highly representative and constitutes a key locality serving as a first-order international reference in various fields of geosciences, namely palaeo-environment and sequence stratigraphy, palaeontology (fossils and trace fossils), biostratigraphy, and palaeo-geography. All these features support the general scientific value of the geo-site described herein and the international relevance of the reference Marhouma (or Km 30) section (Saoura Valley) with its geological features or geological framework, such as the micro- and macrofossil diversity and abundance. Additionally, the geo-sites display several well-preserved geological features of scientific relevance, easily available for future research. Similarly, the geomorphological significance of the Saoura Valley lies within the diversity of its many desert landform elements, mainly dealing with the geomorphological processes occurring in such an arid environment. Although the Palaeolithic site was not evaluated using the quantitative method used herein, the bibliography emphasizing its national scientific worth clearly evidenced that this is a genuine portion of the Saoura Valley heritage.
Geo-Education and Geo-Tourism Potential
The quantitative assessment of the educational potential use of the Saoura Valley shows a high geo-educational potential since the site is renowned for its ease-of-use and national uniqueness (Table 4). Furthermore, the selected geo-sites such as the Marhouma (Km 30) section, can also be easily reached by means of transportation and provide safe conditions to prevent people from dangerous behaviour. This site is also characterized by its geodiversity easily observed by students of all school levels. In this sense, the geological diversity and accessibility of the outcrops exposing the continuous Devonian formations, provide a place where school pupils and university students can challenge their scientific knowledge in situ. The studied geo-site has been indeed used for several years as a pedagogical site (geo-didactic) to teach palaeontology, stratigraphy, sedimentology, geodynamics, and even fossilization processes to geology students from several universities, depending on their academic levels (Fig. 12). All these criteria raise the PEU higher.
On the other hand, the assessment of the potential touristic use (PTU) of the Saoura Valley shows a rather high potential since it is close to recreational areas with touristic attractions, especially around the town of Beni Abbes holding the sole accommodation (e.g., Hotel Rym) in the region and not very far from others geo-sites, including the Marhouma (Km 30) section. Generally speaking, as a common practice worldwide, people visit natural sites with fascinating sceneries. According to Hose et al. (2011), geographically and geologically significant landscapes play an important role in tourism development and attraction, aptly called geo-tourism. Thus, geo-tourism is a type of tourism enabling the public to learn about the geological and geomorphological processes of a specific location (Hose 1996). It can also be used in geo-education for its geodiversity, constitutes a new form of scientific popularization of geology, and serves as a valuable economic resource for communities near geo-sites. In this context, the Saoura Valley site, including the town of Beni Abbes, offers a beautiful perspective and provides opportunities for a variety of touristic activities, such as hiking and camping in the sand dunes to experience nomadic life, sand skiing, visiting the oasis and talking to local people to learn more about their culture and traditions, and climbing the giant sand dunes to take a more authentic look at this sand sea (Fig. 13). In this arid area, the sand dunes are considered an important component of the desert in several aspects, including the ecological, technical, symbolic, social, and aesthetic issues of several human groups (Varichon and Roccella 2006; Boulay and Gélard 2013; Lahmidi et al. 2020). Additionally, they are regarded as a natural resource, demonstrating the complexities of scientific, socio-economic and environmental concerns (Welland 2009), therefore considered as a specific resource and cultural tourism of the region.
Furthermore, the town of Beni Abbes has several monuments and touristic areas (Fig. 14) that attract tourists every year, among which are the palm groves of the oasis, the church and the history of its presence in the region (the rite of Father Charles de Foucauld), and the scientific heritage museum in the region of El Ouahat. This latter facility consists in a research centre on dry areas and belongs to the “Unité de Recherche sur les Zones Arides (URZA)” created in 1942. The centre is also considered a huge conservation repository for hundreds of different stuffed birds recorded with both their scientific and local names. The municipalities of the county include numerous ksars (a local term for palace), some of which are still inhabited, notably Ksar Beni Abbes (Fig. 14E), as the largest and most important in terms of tourism. The town also uses to organize several festivals all yearlong to celebrate religious holidays (e.g., El Mawlid Ennabaoui), keeping the city in permanent operations during several days to promote customs and traditions (Fig. 14F). All these touristic potentials and characteristics have led the officials to adopt a strategy for tourism promotion and to turn the region into the preferred touristic destination, thus contributing to the protection of these heritages and generating sustainable income for their preservation.
Risk of Degradation
Due to the lithological nature of the Saoura Valley outcrops (such as clay-rich siltstones and shales), mostly exposed to atmospheric conditions, they have already been impacted by deterioration. It had actually taken millions of years for geological processes to develop any geological feature but, in turn, this latter can be easily tampered by anthropogenic interventions. Therefore, various conservation measures are inevitable to manage and safeguard any geo-heritage site (Hose 2000; Crofts and Gordon 2015). The studied geo-sites are located in a municipality with less than 100 inhabitants per km2, thus minimizing anthropic interventions. However, the risk of degradation, especially around the Marhouma (Km 30) section, is related to its lack of control over access and its service by a paved road. Any future development of the road (RN°6) between Bechar and Adrar would have direct consequences for the destruction, especially of the famous and remarkable metric limestone bar rich in Orthoceras (also called the Chinese Wall = “Muraille de Chine”). As a consequence, the geo-resource strata and well-preserved fossils (e.g., FBV), should be protected, especially when considering the easy transportation from the in-situ to the ex-situ position, resulting in a possible permanent loss of geological material of international importance. Therefore, the materials collected by geology students or researchers must be reasonable and subsequently housed in a geological laboratory or museum as a common repository for the scientific community. Overall, the Saoura Valley geo-sites currently show no sign of major degradation. However, we propose to create a geo-park in the Saoura Valley in order to manage the preservation of its significant geo-resources and to prevent these sites from any future degradation. Furthermore, the archaeological site ought to be also included since it started showing signs of degradation due to modern human writings and, on the other hand, it has been the subject of promotion in education and tourism as well. This proposal will contribute to educate the public, to generate awareness about the importance of geosciences and to upraise sustainable economics of rural regions through geo-tourism (Kelley et al. 2019).
Conclusion
The Palaeozoic deposits of the Saoura Valley (Ougarta Range) have been known for more than a century and present the most complete Devonian stratigraphic sequence in southwestern Algeria. The Marhouma reference section is the best place to observe a continuous Devonian exposure within the Ougarta Range. Therefore, this succession has been studied by many researchers of different geological disciplines, given its wealth of geological material of international significance, resulting in many research papers on miscellaneous topics, mostly dealing with stratigraphy and palaeontology. However, despite its geological diversity, it has never been considered or assessed as a geo-heritage deserving more attention, geo-conservation and promotion, not only for the sake of scientific research but also for geo-education and geo-tourism activities. In this context, the Saoura Valley geo-sites meet all conditions to be a first-order destination for visitors of all ages and backgrounds, either for touristic or geo-educational purposes. Thus, we invite the decision makers and the administrative authorities to take measures for the protection and conservation of the geo-sites regarded in this study as geo-sites of international interest in order to make them a popular tourist destination in this area and preserve them for future generations. This will have an extra socio-economic influence in the area, besides characterizing their scientific, educational and tourism attractions. Hence, geo-heritage is highly significant for several reasons. In this way, the proximity of the studied geo-sites to the town of Beni Abbes, (which is actually considered as the preferred tourist destination in the area, particularly during holiday periods) since it already encompasses all the touristic qualifications (e.g., accommodation, oasis, ksars, sand dunes, etc.) and encourages tourist agencies to propose the studied geo-sites as an endearing destination by proposing several geo-trails within the area, especially for those enthusiasts of nature contemplation. Therefore, such a decision will enha-nce local socio-economic development by creating jobs in the sectors of tourism, valorization and conservation, as well as promoting local products and creating sustainable small businesses in this remote area. Consequently, we propose to create a geo-park as one of the most appropriate tools to achieve and realize these goals and, on the other hand, we will be able to promote scientific education for sustainable development.
References
Abbache A, Ouali Mehadji A, Cronier C, Fellah AH, Allaire N, Monnet C (2019) Le Dévonien supérieur Du Sahara nord-occidental (Algérie): Faciès, Environnements et signification géodynamique des calcaires griottes. Carnets De Géologie 19(5):71–96
Abdel Maksoud KM, Al-Metwaly WM, Ruban DA, Yashalova NN (2019) Sand dune migration as a factor of geoheritage loss: evidence from the Siwa Oasis (Egypt) and implications for geoheritage management. Proc Geologists’ Association 130(5):599–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2019.07.001
Aït Kaci A (1990) Évolution lithostratigraphique et sédimentologique du Cambrien des monts d’Ougarta (Sahara algérien nordoccidental). Thèse de Doctorat 3ème cycle, U.S.T.H.B., Alger, 168 pp. (unpublished)
Alimen H (1954) La station rupestre de Marhouma (Sahara occidental). Institut de Recherches Sahariennes, Mémoire n°1, Alger, pp 12–19
Alimen H, Guinet P, Poueyto A (1952) Nouvelles stations de gravures rupestres dans le Sahara Occidental. Bull de la Société préhistorique de France tome 49(n–3–4):129–130
Allaire N, Monnet C, Abbache A, Crônier C (2016) Upper Famennian ammonoids from the Ougarta Basin (Saoura Valley, Algeria). The 60th Palaeontological Association Annual Meeting, Lyon, France, pp 55. (unpublished)
Allaire N, Abbache A, Crônier C, Monnet C (2020) Famennian (late devonian) ammonoids from the Ouarourout section (Saoura Valley, Algeria). Ann Paléontol 106:102363
Benachour HB (2011) Modalités de la transgression du Dévonien moyen à partir des coupes du KM 30 (Vallée de la Saoura) et d’Ain Cheikh (Bassin de Reggan). Mémoire Magister, Université d’Oran, pp 69. (unpublished)
Bendaoud A, Chabou MC, Kolli O, Bouzidi O, Djemai S, Kaabeche H (2015) Use of website and GIS databases for enhancement of geosites in Algeria. In: Errami E, Brocx M, Semeniuk V (eds) From Geoheritage to Geoparks. Geoheritage, Geoparks and Geotourism. Springer, Cham, pp 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10708-0_10
Bendella M (2012) Évolution des traces fossiles dans l’espace (Tell, Atlas, Sahara) et dans le temps en Algérie Occidentale: inventaire et mise en évidence des évènements anoxiques. Thèse de Doctorat en Sciences, Université d’Oran, pp 161. (unpublished)
Bendella M, Ouali Mehadji A (2015) Depositional environment and ichnology (Nereites ichnofacies) of the late devonian Sahara region (SW Algeria). Arab J Geosci 8:5303–5316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1602-9
Bendella M, Benyoucef M, Mikuláš R, Bouchemla I, Ferré B (2022) Storm-dominated shallow marine trace fossils of the Lower Devonian Teferguenite Formation (Saoura Valley, Algeria). Ital J Geosci 141(3):400–425. https://doi.org/10.3301/IJG.2022.23
Bentivenga M, Cavalcante F, Mastronuzzi G, Palladino G, Prosser G (2019) Geoheritage: the foundation for sustainable geotourism. Geoheritage 11(4):1367–1369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00422-w
Benyoucef M, Bouchemla I (2023) First study of continental bioerosion traces on vertebrate remains from the cretaceous of Algeria. Cretac Res 152:105678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105678
Bessedik M, Saint Martin J-P, Belkebir L, Bouhameur M, Satour L, Mansouri MH, Atif KF (2022) Le complexe récifal frangeant du Djebel Murdjadjo (Oranie), patrimoine géologique à conserver. Bulletin du Service Géologique de l’Algérie 30(2):3–16
Besseghier F (2014) Systématique et paléoécologie des Rugosa et tabulata (Anthozoaires) Du Niveau à Faune Benthique variée Du KM 30 et d’Erg El Djemel (Saoura-Ougarta, Algérie). Mémoire Magister, Université d’Oran, 122 pp. (unpublished).
Bhat IM, Chauhan H, Dar RA, Ahmad T (2023) Ladakh Himalayan Ophiolites (LHO): a Geological Heritage of Northwestern India. Geoheritage 15:2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00764-y
Bhosale S, Chaskar K, Pandey DK, Lakhote A, Thakkar A, Chauhan G, Bhandari S, Thakkar MG (2021) Jurassic geodiversity and geomorphosite of Kanthkot area, Wagad, Kachchh, western India. Int J Geoheritage Parks 9(1):51–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.12.008
Bouchemla I (2021) Établissement d’un modèle d’évolution des Zoophycos sur des coupes de références pendant le Phanérozoïque (Algérie). Thèse de Doctorat LMD, Université d’Oran 2 Mohamed Ben Ahmed, pp 257. (unpublished)
Bouchemla I, Bendella M, Benyoucef M, Lagnaoui A, Ferré B, Scherzinger A, Bel Haouz W (2020) The upper Jurassic Faïdja formation (Northwestern Algeria): sedimentology, biostratigraphy and ichnology. J Afr Earth Sc 169:103874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2020.103874
Bouchemla I, Bendella M, Benyoucef M, Vinn O, Ferré B (2021) Zoophycos and related trace fossils from the Chefar El Ahmar Formation, Upper Emsian-Frasnian Ia-Ib (Ougarta, SW Algeria). Proc Geologists’ Association 132(2):207–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2020.10.010
Bouchemla I, Benyoucef M, Klein H, Adaci M (2023) First tetrapod swim traces and associated ichnofauna from the Mesozoic of Algeria, North Africa. Ichnos 30(2):157–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10420940.2023.2258261
Boulay S, Gélard ML (2013) Vivre Le Sable Corps, matière et sociétés: une introduction. Techniques Cult 61(2):10–27
Boumendjel K, Paris F (1997) Chitinozoaïres. In: Boumendjel K, Morzadec P, Paris F, Plusquellec Y, Brice D, Copper P, Gourvennec R, Jahnk H, Lardeux H, Le Menn J, Melou M, Racheboeuf PR (Eds) Les faunes du Dévonien de l’Ougarta (Sahara occidental, Algérie). Annales de la Société Géologique du Nord 5 (2ème série), pp 91–94
Boumendjel K, Morzadec P, Paris F, Plusquellec Y, Brice D, Copper P, Gourvennec R, Jahnk H, Lardeux H, Le Menn J, Melou M, Racheboeuf P (1997) Les faunes Du Dévonien De l’Ougarta (Sahara Occidental, Algérie). Ann De La Société Géologique Du Nord 5 2–me s–rie:89–116
Brice D (1997) Brachiopodes Pentameridea, Rhynchonelloidea, Athyroidea, Retzoidea, Atrypoidea et Terebratuloidea. In: Boumendjel K, Morzadec P, Paris F, Plusquellec Y, Brice D, Copper P, Gourvennec R, Jahnk H, Lardeux H, Le Menn J, Melou M, Racheboeuf PR (Eds) Les faunes du Dévonien de l’Ougarta (Sahara occidental, Algérie). Annales de la Société Géologique du Nord 5 (2ème série), pp.105–107
Brilha J (2016) Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review. Geoheritage 8:119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3
Cameron E (2022) Outside geomorphosites. Geoheritage 14(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00652-5
Capot-Rey R (1965) Étude Stratigraphique Des formations quaternaires du Sahara Nord-Occidental. Ann De Géographie 74:488–490
Casier JG (1982) Les ostracodes du Frasnien et de la base Du Famennien De La coupe du km 30 (Saoura, Sahara algérien). Bull De La Société Belge De Géologie 91:195–207
Casier JG (1985) Les ostracodes de la partie supérieure de la formation de Teferguenite (Givétien) et de la formation de Marhouma (Givétien-Famennien) de la coupe du km 30. Geobios 18:833–846Saoura, Sahara algérien
Chabou MC, Laghouag MY, Bendaoud A (2015) Dinosaur track sites in Algeria: a significant national geological heritage in danger. In: Errami E, Brocx M, Semeniuk V (eds) From Geoheritage to Geoparks. Geoheritage, Geoparks and Geotourism. Springer, Cham, pp 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10708-0_11
Chauhan S, Desai B (2023) Geosites of the early cretaceous (Bhuj Formation) based on their ichnological values: insights from the Kachchh Basin, Western India. Geoheritage 15:9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00772-y
Chauhan G, Biswas SK, Thakkar MG, Page KN (2021) The unique geoheritage of the Kachchh (Kutch) Basin, Western India, and its conservation. Geoheritage 13:23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00535-1
Chauhan NK, Chauhan G, Agrawal V, Thakkar MG (2023) Geological heritage and geotourism potential of Udaipur region, Rajasthan, India. Geoheritage 15:10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00773-x
Chavan A, Sarkar S, Thakkar A, Solanki J, Jani C, Bhandari S, Bhattacharya S, Desai BG, Ray D, Shukla AD, Sajinkumar KS (2022) Terrestrial martian analog heritage of Kachchh Basin, Western India. Geoheritage 14:33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00666-z
Chikhaoui M (1974) Les ignimbrites et les roches basiques du Précambrien supérieur des Monts d’Ougarta (Saoura). Thèse de Doctorat 3ème Cycle, Alger, Tome 1, pp 114
Conrad J, Pareyn CL, Weyant M (1970) Mise en évidence du Tournaisien inférieur dans la vallée de la saoura (Sahara Nord Occidental) et conséquences paléogéographiques. Comptes Rendus De l’Académie Des Sci 271:900–903
Coratza P, Hobléa F (2018) The specificities of geomorphological heritage. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection, and management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00005-8
Cresswell ID, Semeniuk V (2018) Australian mangroves: their distribution and protection. Threats to mangrove forests. Springer, pp 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73016-5_1
Crofts R, Gordon JE (2015) Geoconservation in protected areas. In: Worboys GL, Lockwood M, Kothari A, Feary S, Pulsford I (eds) Protected area governance and management. ANU Press, Canberra, pp 531–568
Donzeau M (1983) Tectonique Des Monts d’Ougarta. In: Fabre J (ed) Afrique De l’Ouest. Introduction géologique et termes stratigraphiques. Lexique Stratigraphique International, Nouvelle Série. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 118–120
dos Santos WFS, Carvalho IS, Brilha JB, Leonardi G (2016) Inventory and assessment of palaeontological sites in the Sousa Basin (Paraíba, Brazil): preliminary study to evaluate the potential of the area to become a geopark. Geoheritage 8:315–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0165-9
Dowling RK (2010) Geotourism’s global growth. Geoheritage 3(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0024-7
Errami E, Ennih E, Brocx M, Semeniuk V, Otmane K (2013) Geoheritage, geoconservation and aspiring geoparks in Morocco: the Zenaga inlier. Società Geologica Italiana 18:49–53
Fabre J (1976) Introduction à La géologie Du Sahara Algérien. Société Nationale d’Édition et de Diffusion, Alger, p 422
Fabre J (2005) Géologie du Sahara Occidental et Central. Tervuren African Geosciences Collection, Vol. 108. Musée royal de l’Afrique centrale, pp 572
Farsani NT, Coelho C, Costa C (2011) Geotourism and geoparks as novel strategies for socio-economic. Int J Tourism Res 13:68–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.800
Farsani NT, Coelho COA, Costa CMM (2012) Tourism crisis management in geoparks through geotourism development. Revista Turismo Desenvolvimento 3:1627–1638
Fuertes-Gutiérrez I, Fernández-Martínez E (2012) Mapping geosites for geoheritage management: a methodological proposal for the Regional Park of Picos De Europa (León, Spain). Environ Manage 50:789–806
Gautier EF, Larnaude M (1921) L’oued Saoura. Ann De géographie 163:50–59
Ghienne JF, Boumendjel K, Paris F, Videt B, Racheboeuf P, Salem HA (2007) The Cambrian–Ordovician succession in the Ougarta Range (western Algeria, North Africa) and interference of the late ordovician glaciation on the development of the Lower Palaeozoic transgression on northern Gondwana. Bull Geosci 82:183–214
Göddertz B (1987) Devonische Goniatiten aus SW Algerien und ihre stratigraphische Einordnung in die conodoten – abfolge. Palaeontographica Abteilung A 197:127–220
Gray M (2011) Other nature: geodiversity and geosystem services. Environ Conserv 38(3):271–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892911000117
Gray M (2018) Geodiversity: the backbone of geoheritage and geoconservation. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection, and management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12809531-7.00001-0
Haste H (1993) Dinosaur as metaphor. Mod Geol 18:349–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2019.103656
Henriques MH, Neto K (2019) Geoheritage at the Equator: Revisiting Selected Geosites of São Tomé Island (Cameron Line, Central Africa). In: Henriques MH (Ed.) Prime archives in sustainability. Vide Leaf, Hyderabad. https://doi.org/10.37247/PAS.1.2019.01-031
Hose TA (1996) Geotourism, or can tourists become casual rock hounds? In: Bennett MR (ed) Geology on your doorstep. The Geological Society, London, pp 207–228
Hose TA (2000) European geotourism—geological interpretation and geoconservation promotion for tourists. In: Barretino D, Wimbledon WP, Gallego E (Eds) Geological heritage: its conservation and management. Instituto Tecnologico Geominero de Espana, Madrid, pp 127–146.
Hose TA, Vasiljevic DA (2012) Defining the nature and purpose of modern geotourism with particular reference to the United Kingdom and South-East Europe. Geoheritage 4(1–2):25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0050-0
Hose TA, Marković SB, Komac B, Zorn M (2011) Geotourism – a short introduction. Acta Geogr Slov 51(2):339–342. https://doi.org/10.3986/ags51301
Joshi AU, Gorania P, Limaye MA, Chauhan GD, Thakkar MG (2022) Geoheritage values of the Champaner-Pavagadh Archaeological Park, UNESCO World Heritage site, Gujarat, Western India. Geoheritage 14:88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00720-w
Kelley D, Page K, Quiroga D, Salazar R (2019) In the footsteps of Darwin: Geoheritage, Geotourism and Conservation in the Galapagos Islands. Springer Int Publishing 183. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05915-6
Khaldi A, Crônier C, Hainaut G, Abbache A, Ouali Mehadji A (2015) A trilobite faunule from the Lower Devonian of the Saoura Valley, Algeria: biodiversity, morphological variability and palaeobiogeographical affinities. Geol Mag 153:357–387
Lahmidi S, Lagnaoui A, Bahaj T, El Adnani A, Fadli D (2020) First inventory and assessment of the geoheritage of Zagora province from the project Bani Geopark (South-Eastern Morocco). Proc Geologists’ Association 131:511–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2020.05.002
Le Maître D (1952) La faune du Dévonien inférieur et moyen de la Saoura et des abords de l’Erg el Djemel (Sud oranais). Mémoire de la Carte Géologique de l’Algérie 12:1–170
Legrand P (1962) Comparaison des séries cambro-ordoviciennes reconnues en affleurement dans la région d’Amguid et en forage Au centre Du bassin saharien occidental. Bull de la Société géologique de France 7(1):132–135
Legrand P (1967) Nouvelles connaissances acquises sur les limites des systèmes Silurien et Dévonien Au Sahara algérien. Mémoires Du Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières 33:119–137
Legrand P (1977) Les chaînes d’Ougarta au Sahara algérien. In: Martinsson A (Ed) The Silurian–Devonian Boundary. International Union of Geological Sciences, Series A. number 5, pp 195–202
Legrand P (1985) Lower paleozoic rocks of Algeria. In: Holland CH (ed) Lower paleozoic of North Western and West Central Africa. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 5–89
Lipps JH (2009) PaleoParks: our paleontological heritage protected and conserved in the field worldwide. In: Lipps JH, Granier BRC (Eds) Paleoparks: The protection and conservation of fossil sites worldwide. Carnets de Géologie/Notebook on Geology, Brest, Book 2009/03, Chap. 01(CG2009_BOOK_03/01), pp 1–10
Maillet S, Tanjaoui-Arif R, Milhau B, Nicollin JP, Ouali Mehadji A (2013) Ostracodes of the Chefar El Ahmar Formation (Middle Devonian) in the km 30 section (Béni-Abbès area, Saoura, Ougarta Range, Algeria). Revue De Paléobiologie 32:465–480
Malti FZ (2012) Passage Dévonien-Carbonifère dans l’Ougarta; Sahara occidental, Algérie. Thèse de Doctorat en sciences, Université d’Oran, pp 224. (unpublished)
Margiotta S, Sansò P (2014) The geological heritage of Otranto-Leuca Coast (Salento, Italy). Geoheritage 6:305–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0126-8
Marok A (2021) Patrimoine Géologique et Géoarchéologique tlemcénien: intérêt scientifique et visée socio-économique. Konouz (ed), pp 279
Marok A (2023) The Paleontological Heritage of the Tlemcen Region (NW Algeria): Geoconservation and Promotion. Geoheritage 15:71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00840-x
Martin S (2014) Interactive visual media for geomorphological heritage interpretation. Theoretical approach and examples. Geoheritage 6(2):149–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0107-y
Matshusa K, Llewellyn L, Peta T (2021) Challenges of Geotourism in South Africa: a case study of the Kruger National Park. Resources 10:108. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10110108
Mekki F, Bouchemla I, Adaci M, Talmat S, Ferré B, Benyoucef M (2023) A diverse trace-fossil assemblage from the Middle Jurassic (Bajocian) Teniet El Klakh Formation (western Saharan Atlas, Algeria). Proc Geol Assoc 134:573–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2023.07.006
Menchikoff N (1930) Recherches géologiques et morphologiques dans le Nord Du Sahara Occidental. Revue de géographie Physique et de géologie dynamique 3:103–242
Menchikoff N (1933) La série primaire de la Saoura et des chaînes d’Ougarta. Bulletin du Service Géologique d’Algérie (2ème série), pp 108–124
Menchikoff N (1936) Études géologiques sur les confins algéro-marocains du Sud. Bull de la Société géologique de France 5:132
Mir JA, Bhat IM, Murtaza KO, Qader W, Dar RA (2023) Geological Heritage of the Kashmir Valley. North-Western Himalaya India. Geoheritage 15:26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00791-3
Morzadec P (1997) Trilobite. In: Boumendjel K, Morzadec P, Paris F, Plusquellec Y, Brice D, Copper P, Gourvennec R, Jahnk H, Lardeux H, Le Menn J, Melou M, Racheboeuf PR (Eds) Les faunes du Dévonien de l’Ougarta (Sahara occidental, Algérie). Annales de la Société Géologique du Nord 5 (2ème série), pp 114–115
Mottequin B, Malti FZ, Benyoucef M, Crônier C, Samar L, Randon C, Brice D (2015) Famennian rhynchonellides (Brachiopoda) from deep-water facies of the Ougarta Basin (Saoura Valley, Algeria). Geol Mag 152:1009–1024
Moufti MR, Németh K (2013) The intra-continental Al Madinah Volcanic Field, Western Saudi Arabia: a proposal to establish Harrat Al Madinah as the first volcanic geopark in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Geoheritage 5:185–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-013-0081-9
Nedjari A (2023) Algérie, patrimoine géologique. Agence de Service Géologique de l’Algérie (ed), pp 249
Nemra A (2013) Figures et structures sédimentaire de l’Oued Saoura. Mémoire de Master, Université d’Oran 2 Mohamed Ben Ahmed, pp 75
Ollier C (2012) Problems of geotourism and geodiversity. Quaestiones Geographicae 31(3):57–61. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-012-0025-5
Osborne RA (2000) Geodiversity: "green" geology in action. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 122:149–173
Ouali Mehadji A (2004) Les brachiopodes du niveau majeur Emsien supérieur/Eifélien inférieur de la Saoura (Sahara Nordoccidental, Algérie), Marqueur évènementiel de la transgression fini-emsienne. (Paléontologie, Biostratigraphie, Taphonomie et Environnement sédimentaire). Thèse de Doctorat en Sciences, Université Oran, pp 229. (unpublished)
Ouali Mehadji A, Elmi S, Racheboeuf P, Mekahli L (2004) Caractéristiques et signification d’un niveau coquillier majeur à brachiopodes, marqueur événementiel dans l’évolution dévonienne de la saoura (Sahara Du Nord-Ouest, Algérie). Compte Rendu Géosciences 336:1283–1292
Ouali Mehadji A, Bendella M, Atif K, Belkacemi K, Abbache A (2012) Estimation De l’épaisseur réelle et environnement de dépôts des terrains du Famennien (Dévonien supérieur) de la région de marhouma (Saoura, Sahara nord-ouest, Algérie). Bull Du Service Géologique Natl 23:3–27
Page KN (2018) Fossils, heritage and conservation: managing demands on a precious resource. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage: assessment, protection, and management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00006-X
Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and example of geomorphological survey. Chin Sci Bull 46:4–6
Panizza M, Piacente S (1993) Geomorphological asset evaluation. Z für Geomorphologie 87:13–18
Paris F, Boumendjel K, Morzadec P, Plusquellec Y (1997) Synthèse chronostratigraphique du Dévonien de l’Ougarta (Sahara occidental, Algérie). Annales de la Societé Géologique du Nord t. 5 (2ème série), pp 117–121
Petter G (1959) Goniatites dévoniennes Du Sahara, Vol. 2. Publications Du Service De La Carte géologique d’Algérie. Nouvelle Série, Paléontologie), Alger, p 313
Petter G (1960) Clyménies Du Sahara, Vol. 6. Publications Du Service De La Carte géologique d’Algérie. Nouvelle Série, Paléontologie), Alger, pp 53–56
Plusquellec Y (1997) Coraux Tabulata et Rugosa. In: Boumendjel K, Morzadec P, Paris F, Plusquellec Y, Brice D, Copper P, Gourvennec R, Jahnk H, Lardeux H, Le Menn J, Melou M, Racheboeuf PR (Eds.) Les faunes du Dévonien de l’Ougarta (Sahara occidental, Algérie). Annales de la Société Géologique du Nord 5 (2ème série), pp 95–99
Reynard E (2004) Geosite. In: Goudie A (ed) Encyclopedia of geomorphology. Routledge, London, p 440
Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini Bissig G (2009) Scientific research on geomorphosites over the last eight years: improvements and aims of the book. STAMPA, pp 5–8. http://hdl.handle.net/11380/634260
Reynard E, Brilha J (2018) Geoheritage: a multidisciplinary and applied research topic. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage: assessment, protection, and management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00030-7
Sallam ES, Abd El-Aal AK, Federov YA, Bobrysheva OR, Ruban DA (2018) Geological heritage as a new kind of natural resource in the Siwa Oasis, Egypt: the first assessment, comparison to the Russian South, and sustainable development issues. J Afr Earth Sc 144:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.04.008
Seddiki S (2013) Le Néolithique dans de Sud-Ouest d’Algérie. Revu Oussoure 12(1):329–343
Si Mhamdi H, Charroud A, Oukassou M, Alali A, Baidder L, Raji M, Ljaajaane A, Elfaiz S, Elouariti S (2023) Enhancing the Geological Heritage of the Errachidia Area in the High Atlas Morocco: Inventory and a Proposal for a Pedagogic and Geotouristic Trail. Geoheritage 15:45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00813-0
Tandjaoui-Arif R (2014) Les Conodontes du Dévonien moyen de la coupe du KM 30 (Saoura, Algérie): Biostratigraphie, Bioévénements et Environnement. Mémoire de Magister, Université d’Oran, pp 68. (unpublished)
Tavares AO, Henriques MH, Domingos A, Bala A (2015) Community involvement in geoconservation: a conceptual approach based on the geoheritage of South Angola. Sustainability 7(5):4893–4918. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7054893
Thakkar MG, Chauhan G, Padder AH, Parcha SK, Sharma S, Thakur VC, Dorjay CP (2023) Geoheritage merits of the Zanskar Range of the Kashmir Himalaya: a field Geology Museum from Precambrian to Present. Geoheritage 15:75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00842-9
Torrens H (1993) The dinosaurs and Dinomania over 150 years. Mod Geol (Halstead Meml Volume) 18:257–286
Varichon A, Roccella C (2006) Être Sable. Seuil, France, Paris, p 191
Welland M (2009) Sand – a Journey through Science and the imagination. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 352
Wimbledon WAP (1996) GEOSITES, a new IUGS initiative to compile a global comparative site inventory, an aid to international and national conservation activity. Episodes 19:87–88
Wimbledon WAP, Benton MJ, Bevins RE, Black GP, Bridgland DR, Cleal CJ, Cooper RG, May VJ (1995) The development of a methodology for the selection of British sites for conservation. Part 1. Mod Geol 20:159–202
Zagorchev I, Nakov R (1998) Geological heritage of Europe. Geologica Balcanica Special Issue 28:3–4
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the General Directorate of Scientific Research and Technological Development (“DGRSDT”), Algeria. The authors are thankful to the anonymous reviewers for their comments and valuable suggestions. Dr Bruno Ferré (Saint Étienne du Rouvray, France) ironed up the preliminary English version of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Imad Bouchemla conceived and designed the study, collected and analyzed data, and wrote the original draft. Madani Benyoucef supervised and performed both the experiment and the field job. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bouchemla, I., Benyoucef, M. Geo-Heritage and Geo-Tourism Potential of the Saoura Valley: A Field Geology Museum in the Ougarta Range (SW Algeria). Geoheritage 16, 56 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-00954-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-00954-w