Abstract
Geosites and geotouristic in Al-Soudah are considered a geoheritage which enhances geotourism, which includes geomorphological, landscape, archaeological, and historical sites. The presence of geoheritage of high aesthetic value and its assessment is the basis for implementing the strategy of geoconservation. The methodology included the study of natural and cultural heritage of tourist value, using digital mapping tools, as well as information collected from fieldwork. This includes the identification and inventory of geosites and geotouristic sites, geotouristic significance, and geotouristic scientific interpretation by which has created geotourism and tourism itineraries maps. Besides, a SWOT Plus analysis is conducted to suggest strategies to enhance geotourism. The results show that cultural and geodiversity are highly valued as geoheritage for promoting geotourism in Al-Soudah. Accordingly, a geotouristic map was created, which provides an overview of the geoheritage, in addition to the proposed geotouristic itineraries, geohiking trails, and cable car maps. Furthermore, the most interesting sites from both a scientific and touristic outlook—perspectives, in order to highlight the geodiversity to promote and preserve geotourism, through the proposal of Al-Soudah as a UNESCO Global Geopark, in order to increase the tourist attractiveness.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Al-Soudah is endowed with abundant natural diversity that positions it well to compete in the regional, national, and international tourism market. Natural diversity is represented by various landscapes including extensive mountain ranges, valleys, waterfalls, and natural springs. Nevertheless, there are several tourism niches including geological and geomorphological geodiversity, geoarchaeological heritage villages, archaeological sites, and Al-Qatt Al-Asiri art. Currently, the most internationally accepted definition of geotourism is that of Newsome and Dowling (2018): “Geotourism is a form of natural area tourism that specifically focuses on geology and landscape. It promotes tourism to geosites and the conservation of geodiversity, as well as understanding earth sciences through appreciation and learning. This is achieved through independent visits to geological features, use of geotrails and viewpoints, guided tours, geoactivities, and patronage of geosite visitor centers.”
In the last few decades, geotourism has shown considerable growth all over the world (Dowling & Newsome 2018). According to Kubalíková (2019), geotourism is appreciated and accepted as a useful tool for promoting natural and cultural heritage and for fostering local and regional economic development, especially within rural areas. In the 1990s, the concept of geotourism (Hose 1996) appeared as “geological” rather than “geographical” tourism. In the first years of the twenty-first century, the National Geographic Society (Stueve et al. 2020) reported for the first time geotourism as geographical tourism. In general, geotourism can be seen as a branch of tourism based on geographical locations and the geological nature which attributes the “sense of place” to the area (Dowling 2011). Reynard et al. (2003) analyzed the relationship between geomorphology and tourism. Geomorphology may be a tourist resource as part of the primary or original offer (the geomorphological site as an attraction or as a support for tourist activity, e.g. climbing) and the secondary or derived offer, when tourist infrastructures (e.g., didactic trails), instruments (e.g., educational booklets), or services (e.g., guided tours) are proposed for effective use of the original offer. Gray (2004) also stated that geodiversity, respectively, geoheritage, was of great value for geotouristic and geoeducational activities—it is one of the functions of geodiversity. It is necessary to do the inventory and evaluation of potential sites.
The importance of the tourist sector is cardinal since tourism is the main economic activity that generates local income for the communities. Geodiversity, biodiversity, and sociocultural aspects are associated in the framework; the selected geosites and geotouristic sites are among the most popular sights of the Al-Soudah. Hence, geoheritage is a term used to identify those specific elements of geodiversity that are selected for geoconservation (Brilha 2018). In other words, geoheritage is representative, balanced, and credible of identified geodiversity elements of the earth that are deemed to be worthy of conservation because of their exceptional scientific value and importance in the reconstruction of the earth’s history (Gray 2013) and (Elassal 2020). Geoheritage and geotourism are closely related in the fact that the development of the latter increases if the former is rich, diverse, and scenic (Migoń & Goudie 2012).
The main objective of this work is to demonstrate that of Al-Soudah has a significant number of geosites and geotouristic attractions, which can be applied within the future Global Geopark. The settlement pressure caused by the strong development of tourism and services threatens the natural wonders of the described area; therefore, it is proposed to protect its advantages. Determining the direction and limits of development will guarantee the preservation of individual geographical forms and the entire geodiversity of the area. Moreover, the inclusion of geosites, mining sites, and other sites (e.g., cultural and architectural) could have an impact on existing routes of the Al-Soudah, together with a global assessment of these itineraries as a basis for enhancing local development.
It is possible to devise strategies to promote geotouristic development by evaluating sites of interest with scientific methodologies and applying a pragmatic approach. To meet this challenge, while at the same time respecting the desire of the community to use and disseminate ancestral practices, georesources are preferred either for their landscape, economic value, or cultural identity, connecting, therefore, geotourism to other types of touristic applications. Thus, it appears that the Geopark Project has to be related to and enriched with sociocultural aspects, relying on the special features of the territory and the geotourism promotion through the establishment of three new geotouristic circuits and geohiking trails on the geotouristic map. The map combines a simplified geomorphological map, geosites, and geoheritage sites, with these geotouristic itineraries. Moreover, the study enabled the creation of a georoute considering the (a) accessibility to the geosites, (b) the short distance between different geosites, and (c) the good preservation of the site either by the community or by government.
This will also enable obtaining geosites and geotouristic evidence to prove the heritage value and touristic attractiveness to develop Al-Soudah as a mountain tourist destination with international standards to serve visitors throughout the year, to provide immersive cultural experiences and to celebrate the picturesque nature. In addition to its economic role in achieving the goals of the Kingdom’s Vision 2030 by developing the tourism and entertainment sectors in Saudi Arabia, the strategy to develop the Asir region under the slogan “Qimm and Shim,” which aims to achieve a comprehensive and unprecedented development renaissance for the region, relying on its strengths of culture and nature that combine originality and modernity, by exploiting the huge tourism potentials in the region that will be invested through quality tourism projects to highlight its lofty peaks along with its geographical and natural diversity, and to reveal its cultural and heritage richness.
The Natural Characteristics of the Study Area
Al-Soudah is located within the administrative scope of the Asir region, between the latitudes of 18° 25′ north and 18° 25′ north and longitudes of 42° 30′ east and 42° 15′ east. It has a total area of about 636.64 km2. Al-Soudah is located 25 km from Abha city (Fig. 1). It is characterized by its picturesque nature, moderate climate, and its high altitudes, where it includes the highest peak in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia at an altitude of 3015 m above sea level. Al-Soudah overlooks the Tihama region, and therefore, magnifying binoculars have been installed in some of its parts to observe the wonderful views of those valleys and the neighboring villages located in the Tihama plains as well as a number of heritage sites as it combines all the elements of natural attractions, historical depth, and human values. The rare vegetation cover that characterizes Al-Soudah Mountains with the clouds (fogs) represents a rare aesthetic value. It also links Al-Soudah to the Rijal Almaa heritage village by cable car suspended as it reaches a height of 1600 m. It roams over the whole of Al-Soudah with its wonderful landmarks on a journey that extends to a distance of 5 km, in addition to the practice of paragliding.
Geological Setting
Al-Soudah is characterized by diverse relief and geological structures. It consists of igneous and metamorphic rocks of various shapes and colors, whose ages exceed hundreds of millions of years, which belongs to the Precambrian, and consists of granitic and crystalline rocks, covered by basalt blocks on its volcanic peaks, dating back to the Tertiary and Quaternary periods (Al-Zahrani 2006, p.14). Including the grooves steep slopes, hills and volcanic plateaus, mountain ridges, valleys, and mountains with soaring peaks, which are often enveloped by clouds and culminate in the peak of Al-Soudah, it is the highest peak in the mountains of Saudi Arabia, where Al-Soudah represents the water dividing line and the source of water for most of the valleys of Asir. Moreover, its geological formation can be considered the main factor in the formation of the landscape and giving the area its attractiveness and distinction in front of tourists. The study area consists of five formations which are as follows (Fig. 2):
-
First formation: alluvium and gravel: it includes fan deposits near tertiary basalt (Qal), with an area of about 22 km2, and a percentage of 3.5% of the study area.
-
Second formation: Wajid Sandstone: Halaban Group within the Tathlith Belt (Qew), with an area of about 3.6 km2, and a percentage of 0.6% of the study area.
-
Third formation: Ablah Group: metasedimentary rock—phyllite, calcareous phyllite, slate, fine-grained graywacke, subordinate marble, and minor quartzite and conglomerate (as), with an area of about 22.1 km2, and a percentage of 3.5% of the study area.
-
Fourth formation: Jeddah Group: basalt and andesite—Pi110w lava, flow bregcia, tuff, dacite tuff, interbedded subordinate, often carbonaceous conglomeratic graywacke and phyllite (jt), with an area of about 148,6 km2, and a percentage of 23.3% of the study area.
-
Fifth formation: Bahah Group within the Tayyah Belt—Volcaniclastic graywacke, carbonaceous shale and siltstone, subordinate chert, slate, and conglomerate, minor interbedded basalt, andesite, and dacite (bt), with an area of about 440.3 km2, and a percentage of 69.2% of the study area.
Topographical Characteristics
The mountainous feature is the dominant character in the study area. It is the highest among the regions of the Kingdom, and it also includes a number of short and medium length waterways. Within the study area the altitudes increase from the west to the east, with a maximum of 3000 m, (2652–2996 m northeast part), and a minimum of 800 m (791–1157 northwest part) (Fig. 3).
Such altitudes slope to great degrees and contribute to the danger of the floods caused by heavy rains. The study area is also characterized by the presence of waterfalls. Its waters are falling most of the year as is the case for the waterfall located in the region known locally as Al-Muhtaba. The study area encompasses the ridges and high mountain peaks—the point of Jabal Al-Soudah is more than 3015 m above sea level. Many valleys split their streams in that mountain range, among the most important of which are Wadi Itwad and Wadi Hali.
Al-Soudah is one of the Kingdom’s most prized hidden treasures. At 3000 m above sea level, a hidden village above the clouds gives spectacular views on the world below. The village of Al-Soudah offers panoramic 360-degree views of the surrounding paradise on earth consisting of mountains covered in sheets of greenery, dense forests, peaks, and valleys. The region has become a top tourist destination due to its rich heritage, history, culture, and all-year-round good weather (Fig. 4).
Al-Soudah overlooks the Tihama mountains with their stunning valleys and quaint villages dotted along the plains and slopes with terraces hanging from the steep cliffs. The villages are less crowded than other sites but unique in their location.
Climatic Characteristics
The study area is characterized by distinctive climatic features, and perhaps its great height had the greatest impact on the level of temperature and precipitation, which left distinctive plant and animal traces in the area. The annual average temperature is about 19.9°. The annual average maximum temperature is 27.7°, and the annual average minimum temperature is reduced to 13.9° (https://www.tutiempo.net). It is clear how the altitude played a prominent role in the general decrease in temperature values compared with the regions located in the same astronomical location.
The region records high values of precipitation, which is not limited to rain only, if the region receives quantities of cold, the cooling processes are more intense and rapid, and rain falls most of the year. However, the quantities and continuity vary according to the type of rain. Since winter rains belong to the type of terrain rain, it is affected by the weak flow of cold and moist air masses from the Mediterranean Sea, accompanied by clear effects of the Red Sea. The summer rains are affected by the monsoons, which often makes it fall accompanied by lightning and thunder. The amount of precipitation is estimated at about 220 mm as an annual average.
Oliver’s Index (THI)
Temperature and humidity index (THI) indicator reflects the heat exchange between the human body and the surrounding environment through the combination of temperature and humidity (Ma & Sun 2007):
where THI is the temperature and humidity index, \(t\) is the temperature in Celsius (°C), and \(f\) is the relative humidity (%). Conversely, the latter’s content depends on the temperature variable directly without the need for the dry thermometer and mileage temperature values that are not available in the stations of the study area. The degree of comfort and discomfort is determined by Table 1 and Fig. 5.
Vegetation Cover
The study area is distinguished by its richness in vegetation since its Juniper forests are dense, almost covering most of the area, and they are perennial. The area has a second layer that consists of dark and shaggy plants. Furthermore, types of junipers grow in the gorges of waterways, such as altar, Al-Jib, and Al-Qaboor. Where moisture opportunities increase in valleys, the plants become denser, and the sizes of juniper trees are larger. The current area of vegetation cover is estimated to be about 125 km2 (Fig. 6).
Materials and Methods
The methodology that led to the realization of this paper has started from the current bibliographic (geological, geomorphological features, and cultural–historical, literary or tourism geography) references. Several steps have been taken to achieve the proposed objectives. The next step was dedicated to field research, where geosites and geotouristic sites were identified and located using the method developed (Reynard et al. 2007).
A database was created in which the attributes that characterize the geosites and geotouristic sites were introduced. This comprises the following elements: general data (name, location, type, property, topographic representation, and photos); qualitative data about the scientific, ecological, cultural and aesthetic values; the presence of some man-made tourism attractions; and the existence of some management measures. Selected geosites and geotouristic sites were finally included within the proposed routes.
In the strategic phase, a SWOT Plus analysis was performed to identify strategies for fostering geotourism. A classic SWOT matrix was adapted from an extended design in Nazarko et al. (2017) as a prospective instrument to categorize significant factors by integration of the occurrence of factors in time (existing vs. potential), their origin (internal vs. external), and their impact (favorable vs. unfavorable). In addition, the following categories are taken into consideration: strengths and weaknesses. SWOT Plus is an assessment method that allows us to describe and analyze strategies for the development of geotourism in the area.
Results and Discussions
The city of Al-Soudah, with a history of more than 3000 years, has many tourist attractions that attract tourists. The attractiveness of the area for geotourism depends on the number of valuable and accessible geosites and geotouristic sites that need to be properly described and evaluated. Al-Soudah is rich in water and is crossed by many watercourses, relatively accessible. It includes many heritage villages and tourist and recreational facilities, including a number of nature parks; 56 sites were studied in the Al-Soudah area, ranging between geoarchaeological, ancient inscription, archaeological sites, and heritage villages (Table 2). The city has a mild climate in summer and winter compared with the surrounding areas. There are many picturesque forests that cover the slopes of the mountains and are surrounded by fogs (Fig. 7), so it is called “the Lady of Fog.”
It is an important area of agricultural production. Much of the ongoing cultivation takes place on the terraces. The cultivated terraces create diversity relief of slopes and represent the salient characteristic, emblematic feature to Al-Soudah. Scenic man-made terraces have been recognized by Archaeological Cultural Landscape of worldwide importance and they are expected to become a part of the list of UNESCO-ICOMOS World Heritage Cultural Landscapes (Fig. 8).
Geoarchaeological Sites
The study of geoarchaeological sites, thus, focuses on the history of landscapes inhabited by our predecessors and utilizes them for pedagogical purposes, including the local community by creating new jobs and opportunities in the tourism sector (Vijulie et al. 2014). Geoarcheotourism is a form of educative tourism that focuses on changing human adaptation with materialistic evidence. Apart from intrinsic values, geoarchaeological sites possess economic, cultural, scientific, and aesthetic values attracting visitors (Gray 2004). Museums, inscriptions on rocks, heritage villages, castles, and forts that exhibit the relationships of our predecessors with the environment are the principal attraction of the geoarchaeosites (Comşa, 1987). Geotourism development in such geoarchaeosites may raise the fund for geoconservation and assure the involvement of the members of host community, who get benefitted economically from archeotourism. The scientific interest, recreational and aesthetic significance, accessibility, and level of exposure of the landscape for geotourists are among the crucial enticement factors in this context (Bentivenga et al. 2017; Palladino et al. 2013). The study region is endowed with a number of outstanding hills from where a number of artifacts have been discovered. Apart from inscription, there are 10 sites (Table 3, Fig. 9). There are also 13 archeological sites and heritage villages (Table 4, Fig. 10) that, with evident interest, were subjected to a more detailed study.
Geosites
Al-Soudah geomorphology and diversity of landforms that are the immediate result of many geomorphological agents, fluvial, waterfall, and lake, have led through time to the shaping of a vivid landscape in the area. The geosites located in scattered places, best known by their population and covering Al-Soudah area approximately, will be analyzed. Many of them encompass an important cultural component, linked to anthropic tourist (cultural, historical, religious, artistic, and architectural) sites. In the analyzed area, seven geosites have been identified and localized, with scientific, cultural, and site description. Al-Soudah has numerous rapids and waterfalls and the most remarkable geosites (Table 5, Figs. 11 and 12).
Viewpoint Sites
The most popular touristic places are viewpoints, where almost one can observe most of the city of Abha and Al-Soudah. They are among the most attractive areas for locals and tourists. They have been counted as eleven points (Table 6, Fig. 13).
SWOT Plus Analysis
The classic SWOT Plus matrix analysis was conducted to identify geotourism promotion strategies in Al-Souda; it has been adapted from an extended design (Nazarko, J.; et al. 2017), as a potential tool for classifying significant factors, through the integration of the occurrence of factors in time (existing vs. potential), their origin (internal vs. external), and their impact (favorable vs. unfavorable) (Table 7).
Based on the factors in time (existing vs. potential), their origin (internal vs. external), and their impact (favorable vs. unfavorable), in addition, strengths and weaknesses, in order to develop the quality of the geosites and geotouristic sites in order to diversify the resources of tourism in Al-Soudah, there are techniques concerning the improvement are introduced:
-
Involve local communities in the sustainable control of geological resources for the mutual exchange of geological, cultural, and historical experiences through diverse social activities.
-
Encouraging scientific research in the field of geosciences and geotourism to value the potential of tourism through conducting national and international research.
-
Establishing and activating information centers in the geosites, where various forms of materials on the culture and history of the sites are provided to the arriving tourists.
Therefore, it is necessary to highlight Al-Souda to develop a website, in which tourists are likely to find data about the region, and thus place it on the map of domestic and foreign tourism. Below are the actions that must be taken into account to ensure the sustainable development of the region in the short term.
-
Citizens of Al-Soudah, especially those in connection with tourists, should be geoeducated.
-
Follow up the tourist’s behavior and how far they are satisfied with the recorded trips.
-
The application of proportional aspects of geoconservation: sewage management, hygiene, watching touring trails, and waste segregation.
-
Creating a database on the geoheritage and the state of the environment and developing strategies to preserve Al-Soudah.
Geotouristic Map
The present study has produced the geotourism map that summarizes the most important geoheritage elements of Al-Soudah and that could be used to promote and advertise the local geotourism. The produced map shows seven geotouristic itineraries connecting 56 of the most spectacular geomorphosites of the area (Bouzekraoui & Ferhane), geological and geomorphological objects, landforms, and high mountain landscapes. Knowing that there is no specific methodology aimed at the implementation of this geotourism map, the latter was developed from the simplification of the geomorphological map of the Al-Soudah, following the steps taken by Coratza and Hobléa (2018), Bissig (2008), Coratza and Regolini-Bissig (2009), and Ilies et al. (2011). Such sources are adopted to create the map legend, guided by the methodologies proposed by Bertacchini et al. (2007), Coratza and Hobléa (2018) Erhartič (2010a and 2010b), Regolini-Bissig Reynard (2010) Comănescu et al. (2013), and Bouzekraoui et al. (2018).
The legend of the established map has been simplified so that it would be easily read and understood by the different categories of tourists, mainly a public of nonspecialists, and to help them improve their understanding of geoscientific terms. The colored circles were further used to designate the location of the main geosites that constitute the main theme in the proposed itineraries. The basic information for tourists was also included: parking lots, information panels, geotourist itinerary, and the material cultural sites. A digital terrain model (DTM) has also been used as a base map in order to show the relief (Fig. 14).
The activity of geotourism necessarily involves interaction with the natural environment. Yet, the degree of interaction will vary depending on the geotourist cultural background and the physical ability as mentioned by Swarbrooke et al. (2003) and Newsome and Dowling (2010). These interactions are mainly prevalent in mountainous areas where several natural hazards are abundant as stated by Coratza and De Waele (2012). Al-Soudah is located on the top of the Sarawat Mountains, i.e., it is among risky areas. Thus, it is recommended to survey the potential hazards and the geomorphological features that could impede progress during tourist itineraries in order to facilitate and allow tourists to enjoy the landscape and avoid any potential dangers, as indicated by Bell (1999), Piccazzo et al. (2007), Reynard (2008), and Pelfini et al. (2009). Responding to this claim, it is noted that the itineraries and trails in Al-Soudah cross a series of torrents, which can be potentially dangerous for tourists in periods of long or heavy rain. Further, geotouristic itineraries are going along slippery slopes caused by the presence of unstable materials and rock fall in some places on the trail’s destinations is very difficult.
Proposed tourist routes
Geotouristic Itineraries
Al-Soudah is distinguished by its unique and rich natural and cultural heritage whose features are still evident in the surrounding landscape and heritage villages. Considering the previous stages of the study and the relationship between geomorphosites and the anthropic tourist sites, seven geotourism routes (Fig. 15) were established. Their main characteristics are summarized in Table 8. In Al-Soudah, geotourism maps have been made and such tours have been proposed. These are the proposals for such routes which try to cover both the existing and inventoried geomorphosites within Al-Soudah and the main cultural tourist attractions located in this area.
The seven itineraries described connect the 56 geotouristic with the high mountain landscapes. The proposal of these itineraries aims at creating an opportunity to raise awareness of the geological, geomorphological, and archaeological features existing in the Al-Soudah area that requires both protection and promotion.
A proposed map was drawn showing the time and distance which the tourist takes to be covered between the different touristic facilities and sites in the study area from Abha airport. The time required from Abha Airport to the location is shown in Fig. 16, and distance required from Abha Airport to the location is illustrated in Fig. 17. Moreover, tourists and visitors can benefit from extra information about access conditions to the different geosites of the region. Besides, a map of the accessibility from Abha Airport–Isochrone (minutes) to the study area is indicated in Fig. 18. These maps are an important guide for the international, local, and regional visitor since they show the distance, time and accessibility taken from Abha Airport and to the site he/she wants to visit.
Geohiking Trail
A geohiking trail has been proposed within the study area to revitalize the tourist sites and to increase the opportunity for their investment. The proposal of this geohiking trail aims to enjoy seeing the landscape and geography by creating an opportunity to raise awareness of the geosites and geotouristic sites existing in Al-Soudah. The proposed geohiking trail covers eleven geosites. The length of the geohiking trail inside Al-Soudah is 45.1 km (Fig. 19).
Cable Cars
Al-Soudah has two cable cars: Route 1 with a length of 2.85 km, and Route 2 with a length of 11 km. They do not cover the vision of all geosites and geotouristic sites in the area, shown in a blue line (Fig. 14). Therefore, three cable cars have been proposed. They cover the largest number of landscapes in the study area: Route 3 with a length of 11.1 km, Route 4 with a length of 4.50 km, and Route 5 with a length of 10.60 km. The three proposed cable car lines contain ten stations, which gives more opportunity for tourists to enjoy and choose between cable car lines and start from any station, shown in a purple line (Fig. 20).
Conclusions
This paper is the starting point for a larger process aimed at identifying and evaluating of geosites and important tourist cities in the Asir region. The main purpose is to make them known and popular to highlight their scientific (including educational), aesthetic, and cultural value in the light of the Asir development strategy. It was launched under the slogan “Qimm and Shim” which pays more attention to the preparation of actions for geoconservation measures to the development of geotourism and achieve a comprehensive and unprecedented development renaissance for the region. The authors estimate that this area could be a candidate for a geopark in Al-Soudah. This is due to the unique natural and cultural attractions that also have include high scientific, educational, and tourism values. The display of geodiversity and other natural values of the area should be combined with educational activities among the population. There is an urgent need to raise awareness and to take appropriate measures to protect geoheritage, the remaining natural heritage and cultural heritage: tangible and intangible.
The SWOT Plus analysis of Al-Soudah has led to the following conclusions: it is possible to expand the understanding of the existing and potential factors that have (or may have) an impact on the development and protection of geotourism in the region; it is a valuable strategic tool for analyzing local development and its vision towards the future.
The Geopark project in Al-Soudah, the concept of geosites and geotouristic looks to be suitable for this purpose, because it includes a lot of evaluation methods for the geosites and geotouristic from different points of view. Al-Soudah proud to have natural, historical, touristic, and cultural geosites as valuable resources for geotourism. Moreover, the inventory and the assessment of geosites of interest based on technical criteria are basic and expected to become a member of the UNESCO Global Geoparks, where inclusion leads to of the UNESCO Global Geopark would allow for ensuring the protection of unique geoheritage.
The reinforcement of this geopark project will allow for the development of the citizens in this area, and will provide understanding of the uniqueness and real value of the area they inhabit. Knowledge of geoheritage would bring more involvement into proper conservation and enhancement of the georesources and would also allow for the potentiation of the regions’ cultural, natural, and social resources. In the end, the proposed digital mapping for instance: geotouristic, geotouristic itineraries, geohiking trails, and cable car maps, to appraise value and importance of geosites and geotouristic heritage of Al-Soudah.
References
Al-Harbi, Haifa Jabir (2020) Framework for designing sustainable mountain resorts in, Saudi Arabia, Master of Architecture, Dar Al-Hekma University, Jeddah, Saudi (Order No. 28317113). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2512301542). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/dissertationstheses/framework-designing-sustainable-mountain-resorts/docview/2512301542/se-2?accountid=142908
Al-Zahrani A-R (2006) Effects of urban growth on tourism areas in Aseer province; (a study on: effects of urban growth on natural areas of tourism potential). Damascus University, Syrian arab Republic Faculty of Architecture, Syrian arab Republic
Bell FG (1999) Geological hazards: their assessment, avoidance and mitigation. Taylor and Francis, London
Bentivenga M, Palladino G, Prosser G, Guglielmi P, Geremia F, Laviano A (2017) A geological itinerary through the Southern Apennine Thrust Belt (Basilicata-Southern Italy). Geoheritage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0168-6
Bentivenga M, Cavalcante F, Mastronuzzi G, Palladino G, Prosser G (2019) Geoheritage: the foundation for sustainable geotourism. Geoheritage J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00422-w
Bertacchini M, Benito A, Castaldini D (2007) Carta geo-archeo-turistica del territorio di Otricoli (Terni, Umbria). In Proceedings of the 3rd National Conference of the Italian Association Geology and Tourism, Bologna (Italy) 1–3 March 2007, 213–220
Brilha J (2018) Geoheritage and geoparks. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage: assessment, protection, and management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 323–336
Brol R, Sztando A (2002) Dlaczego i jaknalezy wzbogacac´ procedure˛ SWOT w procesie terytorialnego planowania strategicznego [Why and how to enrich SWOT procedure in the process of territorial strategic planning]. In Problemy Zarza˛dzania w Działalnos´ci Samorza˛du Terytorialnego [Management Problems in the Activities of Local Government]; Uniwersytet Opolski: Opole, Poland, pp. 55–82
Bouzekraoui H, Ferhane D (2017) An exploratory study of women’s entrepreneurship in Morocco. J Entrepreneur: Res Pract 2017. https://doi.org/10.5171/2017.869458
Bucci F, Tavarnelli E, Novellino R, Palladino G, Guglielmi P, Laurita S, Prosser G, Bentivenga M (2019) The history of the Southern Apennines of Italy preserved in the geosites along a geological itinerary in the High Agri Valley. Geheritage J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00385-y
Carrión-Mero P, Herrera-Narváez G, Herrera-Franco G, Sánchez-Zambrano E, Mata-Perelló J, Berrezueta E (2021) Assessment and promotion of geo-touristic and geo-mining routes as a basis for local development: a case study. Minerals 11(4):351. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11040351
Comănescu L, Nedelea A, Dobre R (2013) The geotouristic map - between theory and practical use. Case study - the central sector of the Bucegi mountains (Romania). Geojournal Tourism Geosites 11(1):16–22
Comănescu L, Nedelea A, Stănoiu G (2017) Geo-morphosites and geo-tourism in Bucharest city center (romania). Quaestiones Geographicae 36(3):51–61. https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2017-0029
Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (2009) Methods for mapping geomorphosites. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) geomorphosites. Pfeil-Verlag, München, pp 89–103
Coratza P, De Waele J (2012) Geomorphosites and natural hazards: teaching the importance of geomorphology in society. Geoheritage 4:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-012-0058-0
Coratza P, Hobléa F (2018) “The specificities of geomorphological heritage”, in Geoheritage: assessment, protection, and management. Editors e Reynard J Brilha (Elsevier) 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809531-7.00005-8
Dowling JR (2011) Geotourism’s global growth. Geoheritage 3:1–13
Dowling RK, Newsome D (2018) Handbook of geotourism. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (ISBN 978-1-78536-885-1)
Elassal M (2020) Geomorphological heritage attractions proposed for geotourism in Asir Mountains Saudi Arabia. Geoheritage 12:78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00505-z
Erhartič B (2010a) Geomorphosite assessment. Acta Geogr Slov 50–2. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS50206
Erhartič B (2010b) Conserving geoheritage in Slovenia through geomorphosite mapping. Lausanne, Institut de géographie, Géovisions n°35, pp. 47–63
Farsani N, Coelho C, Costa C, Amrikazemi A (2014) Geo-knowledge management and geo-conservation via geo-parks and geo-tourism. Geo-Heritage 6:185–192
Garofano M (2014) Geo-watching, a term for the popularisation of geological heritage. Geo-Heritage 7:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0114-z
Giano SI, Pescatore E, Biscione M, Masini N, Bentivenga M (2022) Geo- and archaeo-heritage in the Mount Vulture area: list, data management, communication, and dissemination A Preliminary note. Geoheritage 14:10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00623-2
Gray M (2004) Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature. John Wiley, Chichester
Gray M (2013) Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature, 2nd edn. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester
Herrera-Franco G, Carrión-Mero P, Alvarado N, Morante-Carballo F, Maldonado A, Caldevilla P, Berrezueta E (2020) Geosites and georesources to foster geotourism in communities: case study of the santa elena peninsula geopark project in ecuador. Sustainability 12(11):4484. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114484
Hose TA (1996) Geo-tourism, or can tourist become casual rockhounds. In: Bennet MR (ed) Geology on your doorstep. The Geological Society, London, pp 207–228
Ilies R, Johnson MD, Judge TA, Keeney J (2011) A within-individual study of interpersonal conflict as a work stressor: dispositional and situational moderators. J Organ Behav 32(1):44–64
Jakubowski, KJ (2003) Geological heritage and museums. In Proceedings of the Conference " Geological Heritage Concept, Conservation and Protection Policy in Central Europe", Cracow, Poland, 3–4 October 2003; Polish Geological Institute Special Papers, 13(2004):21–28
Justice S (2018) UNESCO global geo-parks, geo-tourism and communication of the earth sciences: a case study in the Chablais UNESCO Global Geopark France. Geosciences 8:149
Kubalíková L, Kirchner K (2016) Geo-site and geo-morphosite assessment as a tool for geo-conservation and geo-tourism purposes: a case study from Vizovická vrchovina highland (eastern part of the Czech Republic). Geo-Heritage 8:5–14
Kubalíková L (2019) Assessing geotourism resources on a local level: a case study from Southern Moravia (Czech Republic). Resources 8(3):150. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8030150
Liang Z, Wangqun X, Yao R (2020) Luzhou cultural tourism landscape design under the background of regional culture. J Landscape Res 12(5):106–108. https://doi.org/10.16785/j.issn1943-989x.2020.5.024
Liu Y (2019) Salt culture and sports leisure tourism landscape design. J Landscape Res 11(2):66-67,70. https://doi.org/10.16785/jissn1943-989x2019.2.015
Ma LJ, Sun GN (2007) Evaluation of tourism climate comfortableness in Shaanxi province. Resour Sci 29:40–44
Mariotto FP, Venturini C (2017) Strategies and tools for improving earth science education and popularization in museums. Geo-Heritage 9:187–194
McKeever P, Zouros N (2005) Geoparks: celebrating earth heritage, sustaining local communities. Episodes 28:274–278
Migoń P, Goudie A (2012) Pre-Quaternary geomorphological history and geoheritage of Britain. Quaestiones Geographicae 31(1), Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, pp. 67–79. DOI https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-012-0004-x
Nazarko J, Ejdys J, Halicka K, Magruk A, Nazarko Ł, Skorek A (2017) Application of enhanced SWOT analysis in the future-oriented public management of technology. Procedia Eng 182:482–490
Newsome D, Dowling R (2005) The scope and nature of geo-tourism. In: Dowling R, Newsome D (eds) Geo-tourism. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–25
Newsome D, Dowling RK (2010) Geotourism: the tourism of geology and landscape. Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers. https://doi.org/10.23912/978-1-906884-09-3-21
Newsome D, Dowling R (2018) Geo-heritage and geo-tourism. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geo-heritage: assessment, protection, and management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 305–321
Palacio-Prieto, José Luis, (2013). Geositios, geomorfositios y geoparques: importancia, situación actual y perspectivas en México. Investigaciones Geograficas: Boletin - Instituto de Geografia, Universidad Nacional, Autonoma de Mexico 291(82):24-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0188-4611(13)72784-5
Palladino G, Prosser G, Bentivenga M (2013) The geological itinerary of Sasso di Castalda: a journey into the geological history of the Southern Apennine thrust-belt (Basilicata-Southern Italy). Geoheritage 5:47–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-012-0073-1
Pelfini M, Brandolini P, Carton A, Piccazzo M (2009) Geotourist trails: a geomorphological risk impact analysis. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) Geomorphosites. Pfeil Verlag, München, pp 131–144
Pescatore E, Bentivenga M, Giano SI, Siervo V (2019) Geomorphosites: versatile tools in geoheritage cultural dissemination. Geheritage J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00378-x
Piccazzo M, Brandolini P, Pelfini M (2007) (Eds) Il Clima e i rischi geomorfologici in relazione allo sviluppo turistico. Pàtron Editore, Bologna
Pop D, Horák J, Hurlbut J (2004) Mineral museums as alliance partners in teaching mineral sciences. J Geosci Educ 52:87–96
Regolini-Bissig G, Reynard E (eds.) (2010). Mapping geoheritage. Géovisions 35. Internet: http://igd.unil.ch/www/geovisions/35/Geovisions35.pdf (11. 12. 2015)
Reynard E, Holzmabb C, Guex D (2003) Géomorphologie et tourisme: Actes de la Réunion annuelle de la Société Suisse de Géomorphologie (SSGm), Finhaut, 21-23 septembre 2001, Lausanne, Institut de Géographie, Travaux et Recherches n° 24, 2003, pp. 1-10
Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007) A method for assessing «scientific» and «additional values» of geo-morphosites. Geograph Helvet 62(3):148–158. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-62-148-2007
Reynard E (2008) Scientific research and tourist promotion of geomorphological heritage. Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 31:225–230
Reynard E, Fraj TB, Messedi AG, Ouezdou HB, Ouaja M, Matthijs Y (2022) Patrimoine géologique et géomorphologique : Base pour le géotourisme et la création d’un géoparc UNESCO dans le dahar (sud-est tunisien). Geograph Helvet 77(1):97–119. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-97-2022
Stoffelen A, Groote P, Meijles E, Weitkamp G (2019) Geoparks and territorial identity: a study of the spatial affinity of inhabitants with UNESCO Geopark De Hondsrug, The Netherlands. Appl Geogr 106:1–10
Stueve A, Cook S, Drew D (2020) The geo-tourism study: phase 1 executive summary. National Geographic Traveller, Travel Industry Association of America. Availableonline:https://www.crt.state.la.us/downloads/Atchafalaya/GeoTourismStudy.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2020)
Su Q (2019) Authenticity protection of agricultural landscapes in rural tourism development. J Landsc Res 11(3):59-62,66. https://doi.org/10.16785/jissn1943-989x.2019.3.012
Swarbrooke J, Beard J, Leckie S, Pomfret G (2003) Adventure tourism. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
Sztando A (2006) Analiza strategiczna jednostek samorzadu terytorialnego [Strategic analysis of the local governments]. In Metody Oceny Rozwoju Regionalnego [Methods of regional development evaluation]; Strahl, D., Ed.; Wydawnictwo AE we Wrocławiu: Wrocław, Poland
Turner-Carrión M, Carrión-Mero P, Turner-Salamea I, Morante-Carballo F, Aguilar-Aguilar M, Zambrano-Ruiz K, Berrezueta E (2021) A mineralogical museum as a geotourism attraction: a case study. Minerals 11(6):582. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11060582
UNESCO (2020) What is a UNESCO Global Geopark? Available online: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/earth-sciences/unesco-global-geoparks/frequently-asked-questions/what-is-aunesco-global-geopark/ (accessed on 14 May 2020)
Vijulie I, Matei E, Tîrlă L, Manea G, Zorzoliu T (2014) The role of archaeological landscape restoration in building the local tourism image: the Gumelniţa Archaeo-Park (Drăgăneşti-Olt, Romania). GeoJ Tourism Geosites 1(13):52–65
Xi C, Tong Z, Jing Q (2018) The construction of tourism landscapes in grasslands based on the tourist gaze theory: a case study of grassland tourism in inner mongolia. J Landsc Res 10(6):129. https://doi.org/10.16785/j.issn1943-989x.2016.6.031
Yao X, Zhang M, Zhang Y, Xiao H, Wang J (2021) Research on evaluation of climate comfort in Northwest China under climate change. Sustainability 13:10111. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810111
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the Department of Geography, Faculty of Humanities, King Khalid University for the continuous support towards this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors have contributed to the writing, editing, collecting resources of the submitted manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Al Mohaya, J., Elassal, M. Assessment of Geosites and Geotouristic Sites for Mapping Geotourism: A Case Study of Al-Soudah, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia. Geoheritage 15, 7 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00774-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00774-w