Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects more than one in ten people worldwide. However, results from the REVEAL-CKD study suggest that it is often not diagnosed. Many patients are therefore unaware that they have CKD, putting them at increased risk of disease progression and complications. Empowering patients with knowledge about CKD will allow them to become active participants in their own care, driving improvements in diagnosis rates and changing patient outcomes for the better. In this article, we provide patient and clinician perspectives on the importance of early CKD diagnosis and management. We present an overview of the tests commonly used to diagnose CKD in clinical practice, as well as actionable suggestions for patients, clinicians, and health policymakers that could help improve disease detection and treatment.
Video Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a long-term progressive condition characterized by reduced kidney function that affects an estimated one in ten people worldwide. |
Despite the widespread nature of the disease, the REVEAL-CKD study found that, across five countries, 62–96% of patients with laboratory evidence of stage 3 CKD (moderate kidney damage) lacked a CKD diagnosis in their medical records. |
This article summarizes findings from REVEAL-CKD and offers patient and clinician perspectives on the importance of early CKD diagnosis and management. |
Providing patients with a simple and clear understanding of key kidney function tests could empower them to engage in meaningful conversations about kidney health with their clinicians. |
Together, patients, clinicians, and health policymakers all have a role to play to improve the rates of CKD diagnosis and management, and ultimately improve patient outcomes. |
Digital Features
This article is published with digital features, including an Infographic and a Video Abstract, to facilitate understanding of the article. To view digital features for this article, go to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25000109.
Introduction
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a long-term condition in which the function of the kidneys is reduced. CKD affects an estimated one in ten people [1] and is one of the leading causes of death worldwide [2, 3]. CKD is a progressive disease, meaning that kidney function declines over time [4]. Research has identified shortcomings in early identification and treatment of CKD, despite clinicians and policymakers shining a spotlight on the importance of these actions [5]. However, this growing problem needs to be tackled not just by clinicians and policymakers but through empowering patients themselves.
There are two tests used to diagnose CKD. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is a blood test to estimate the kidneys’ ability to filter waste products from the blood. Urinary albumin–creatinine ratio (UACR) is a test to investigate the level of a protein called albumin in a sample of urine. UACR measures structural damage to the kidneys. The results of these tests are used to divide the severity of CKD into stages from 1 to 5, with stage 1 being mostly normal kidney function and stage 5 being kidney failure [6]. Early in the course of the disease (stages 1–3), patients will often not experience any symptoms [7]. As kidney function continues to decline, patients may experience symptoms such as tiredness, nausea, insomnia, cramps, pain, and itching [8]. If CKD progresses to stage 5, or kidney failure, the kidneys can no longer function well enough for a patient to survive without kidney transplant or dialysis (a medical procedure to remove waste products from the blood) [9]. However, kidney failure is not the only negative outcome of unmanaged CKD—even in the early stages, CKD is associated with an elevated risk of high blood pressure, heart failure, and stroke, and an increased risk of premature death [4, 10].
With early CKD detection, kidney function can often be preserved through lifestyle changes. These include improving diet, managing weight, reducing alcohol consumption, and eliminating tobacco use. It is also important to ensure that other conditions, such as hypertension and type 2 diabetes, are managed appropriately, and that medications for those conditions are taken as prescribed [11, 12]. Eventually, specific medications may be needed to slow kidney function decline [6]. CKD cannot be cured, and it is not possible to reverse the damage already done to the kidneys [4, 13]. Early and effective management is therefore crucial to slow disease progression and delay the development of complications.
The first step towards managing and treating CKD is for patients and clinicians to recognize the condition and treat it as a distinct disease that must be addressed. Patients should feel comfortable with initiating discussions about kidney health with their healthcare team. Such discussions can prompt proper recording of a CKD diagnosis, an essential step to trigger lifestyle adjustments and begin required treatments.
The REVEAL-CKD Study
A patient with undiagnosed CKD is more likely to be a patient with untreated CKD. The REVEAL-CKD study was designed to investigate rates of diagnosis of stage 3 CKD (moderate kidney damage), and to identify shortcomings in CKD diagnosis and management across the globe.
An article from REVEAL-CKD reporting findings from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the USA was published in May 2023 [14]. In this article, the authors found that the proportion of patients with available laboratory evidence of stage 3 CKD, but who did not have a CKD diagnosis in their medical records, ranged from 62% in the USA to 96% in France. In addition to this, the authors found that UACR tests were often unavailable, with over 94% of patients in each country having no record of UACR [15]. These low rates are particularly concerning considering that guidelines recommend UACR testing in patients at risk of CKD [6], and that UACR values are useful both for the accurate staging of CKD and assessing the risk of CKD progression [16]. It should be noted that REVEAL-CKD investigated CKD diagnosis in high-income countries, and the results may therefore not be directly translatable to low- and middle-income countries. However, limited healthcare resources in lower-income countries are likely to result in similar or lower rates of CKD diagnosis and testing than those seen in high-income countries. Therefore, it is still important to raise awareness of the importance of early CKD diagnosis in these countries.
Another article from REVEAL-CKD that investigated patient management and clinical outcomes associated with receiving a CKD diagnosis was also published in May 2023 [15]. This article looked at over 26,000 patients from the USA. The authors found that, after a CKD diagnosis was made, the rate of prescribing of guideline-recommended medications to treat CKD increased substantially (an increase of 62–123% in the 180 days after [versus the 180 days before] CKD diagnosis). In addition, the rate of monitoring for blood pressure, kidney function, and blood sugar levels also increased after a CKD diagnosis. The authors found that, on average, yearly decline of kidney function was around four times slower after a CKD diagnosis compared with before. Finally, a delayed diagnosis was seen to increase risks of progression to stage 4/5 CKD, kidney failure, or cardiovascular events including heart attack, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure.
What Needs to Change: It’s Time to Talk About Our Kidneys
REVEAL-CKD highlights substantial shortcomings in CKD diagnosis across the globe. Blood tests showing that patients have CKD are being performed, but a diagnosis of CKD is not being recorded. Patients may therefore be missing opportunities to manage their disease. Similarly, UACR testing is rarely performed, meaning that the severity of the disease often remains unknown.
It appears that patients and clinicians are not talking about CKD in the same way that they would talk about blood pressure or diabetes. Patients need to be empowered to ask about their kidneys, especially because there are often no symptoms in the early stages of CKD. If a person relies on symptoms alone to identify the disease, then they may only be diagnosed after their kidney function has declined to a point where kidney failure is very close. Acting upon earlier opportunities to foster self-care and improve health behaviour will help to avoid negative outcomes and mitigate the burden of living with CKD.
Improving patients’ understanding of the laboratory tests used to diagnose CKD could help to normalize the discussion of kidney health. If patients understand these tests, they may feel comfortable requesting them and discussing the results with their clinician. Simply understanding that lower eGFR corresponds to reduced kidney function, or high UACR indicates kidney damage, could help patients to engage in conversations about kidney health. A clear and concise understanding of some threshold values for CKD may also help prompt a conversation: eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and/or UACR of 30 mg/g or more (Fig. 1). For example, if their eGFR is 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, patients should feel comfortable asking their doctor about this, just as they might ask about a high blood pressure reading. Furthermore, if a patient has an eGFR that could indicate CKD, they should be confident in asking their clinician for a UACR test so that the disease can be staged accurately.
Awareness of these tests could prompt patients to start conversations about CKD, but clinicians still have an important role to play. In recent years, focus has been placed on early CKD diagnosis and treatment [5], although results from REVEAL-CKD show that there is still much to be done. Clinicians may still be hesitant to diagnose patients with CKD because they are afraid of overwhelming them with the diagnosis of a lifelong condition [17]. However, research has shown that patients want to know about their CKD, and they want to know early [18]. Clinicians should follow guideline recommendations for screening at-risk individuals using both eGFR and UACR tests.
Healthcare systems and policymakers also have an important role to play, and public awareness of CKD could be increased through broad national campaigns. Policymakers should implement changes in the care pathway to incentivize screening and diagnosis of CKD at earlier stages, and increase accessibility of blood and urine tests for CKD.
Early-stage CKD should not be ignored. Patients with undiagnosed CKD may be missing out on lifestyle changes or medical treatments that could prevent further damage to their kidneys. The benefits of early diagnosis are clear, not only from REVEAL-CKD [15] but from a wide array of research that outlines the high burden of late-stage CKD in terms of both symptoms and financial costs [10, 19, 20].
Conclusions
It is time for patients and clinicians to talk about kidney health. These conversations can spark meaningful changes in the management of diet, lifestyle, and medications [21, 22]. Patients should be empowered with knowledge: an understanding of kidney function tests could help them to become active participants in decisions affecting their own care. Similarly, clinicians should be comfortable in diagnosing CKD as early as possible and helping patients to understand their options. Efforts on the part of health policymakers to increase public awareness of CKD, incentivize early CKD diagnosis, and enable adequate screening practices are also needed to tackle the problem. Together, these changes could drive earlier diagnosis and improve outcomes for patients with CKD. Patients want to know, and they deserve to know: know the tests, know their numbers, and know how to manage their CKD.
Data Availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article because no data sets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
Jager KJ, Kovesdy C, Langham R, Rosenberg M, Jha V, Zoccali C. A single number for advocacy and communication-worldwide more than 850 million individuals have kidney diseases. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019;34(11):1803–5.
GBD Chronic Kidney Disease Collaboration. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709–33.
Kovesdy CP. Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease: an update 2022. Kidney Int Suppl. 2022;12(1):7–11.
Webster AC, Nagler EV, Morton RL, Masson P. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet. 2017;389(10075):1238–52.
Shlipak MG, Tummalapalli SL, Boulware LE, et al. The case for early identification and intervention of chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int. 2021;99(1):34–47.
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3:1–150.
Fraser SD, Blakeman T. Chronic kidney disease: identification and management in primary care. Pragmat Obs Res. 2016;7:21–32.
Almutary H, Bonner A, Douglas C. Symptom burden in chronic kidney disease: a review of recent literature. J Ren Care. 2013;39(3):140–50.
Wouk N. End-stage renal disease: medical management. Am Fam Physician. 2021;104(5):493–9.
Wang V, Vilme H, Maciejewski ML, Boulware LE. The economic burden of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Semin Nephrol. 2016;36(4):319–30.
Evangelidis N, Craig J, Bauman A, Manera K, Saglimbene V, Tong A. Lifestyle behaviour change for preventing the progression of chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(10):e031625.
Schrauben SJ, Apple BJ, Chang AR. Modifiable lifestyle behaviors and CKD progression: a narrative review. Kidney360. 2022;3(4):752–78.
Ruiz-Ortega M, Rayego-Mateos S, Lamas S, Ortiz A, Rodrigues-Diez RR. Targeting the progression of chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16(5):269–88.
Tangri N, Moriyama T, Schneider MP, et al. Prevalence of undiagnosed stage 3 chronic kidney disease in France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the USA: results from the multinational observational REVEAL-CKD study. BMJ Open. 2023;13(5):e067386.
Tangri N, Peach EJ, Franzén S, Barone S, Kushner PR. Patient management and clinical outcomes associated with a recorded diagnosis of stage 3 chronic kidney disease: the REVEAL-CKD study. Adv Ther. 2023;40(6):2869–85.
Tangri N, Stevens LA, Griffith J, et al. A predictive model for progression of chronic kidney disease to kidney failure. JAMA. 2011;305(15):1553–9.
Greer RC, Crews DC, Boulware LE. Challenges perceived by primary care providers to educating patients about chronic kidney disease. J Ren Care. 2012;38(4):174–81.
Wright Nunes J, Roney M, Kerr E, Ojo A, Fagerlin A. A diagnosis of chronic kidney disease: despite fears patients want to know early. Clin Nephrol. 2016;86(2):78–86.
Abdel-Kader K, Unruh ML, Weisbord SD. Symptom burden, depression, and quality of life in chronic and end-stage kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(6):1057–64.
Hamer RA, El Nahas AM. The burden of chronic kidney disease. BMJ. 2006;332(7541):563–4.
Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002;15(1):25–38.
Cribb A, Entwistle V, Mitchell P. Talking it better: conversations and normative complexity in healthcare improvement. Med Humanities. 2022;48(1):85–93.
Medical Writing/Editorial Assistance.
Under the direction of the authors, medical writing support for this manuscript was provided by Bobby Thompson, MSc(Res), of Oxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, UK, and was funded by AstraZeneca.
Funding
The REVEAL-CKD study was funded by AstraZeneca. AstraZeneca provided funding for journal Open Access and Rapid Service Fees.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Writing – original draft preparation: Pamela R. Kushner, Jane DeMeis, Petrina Stevens, Ana Marija Gjurovic, Elmas Malvolti, Navdeep Tangri. Writing – review and editing: Pamela R. Kushner, Jane DeMeis, Petrina Stevens, Ana Marija Gjurovic, Elmas Malvolti, Navdeep Tangri. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Jane DeMeis has no conflicts of interest to disclose. Petrina Stevens, Ana Marija Gjurovic, and Elmas Malvolti are employees and shareholders of AstraZeneca. Pamela R. Kushner has received speakers bureau and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, and Novo Nordisk A/S, speaker fees from Bayer AG, and honoraria from AstraZeneca and Eli Lilly and Company. Navdeep Tangri has received grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Tricida, Inc., has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Tricida, Inc., and holds stock options from Mesentech, Inc., PulseData, Inc., Renibus Therapeutics Inc., and Tricida, Inc.
Ethical Approval
This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kushner, P.R., DeMeis, J., Stevens, P. et al. Patient and Clinician Perspectives: To Create a Better Future for Chronic Kidney Disease, We Need to Talk About Our Kidneys. Adv Ther 41, 1318–1324 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-02794-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-02794-0