Abstract
Phytoestrogen (PE) has received considerable attention due to the physiological significance of its estrogenicity. Flemingia strobilifera (FS) has been used as a folk medicine in Asia for the treatment of inflammation, cancer, and infection; however, the estrogenic effects and chemical components of FS have not yet been reported. We aimed to uncover the estrogenic properties and PEs derived from FS using phytochemical and pharmacological evaluation. PEs from FS extract (FSE) were analyzed by NMR, HPLC, and MS. To evaluate estrogenic activity, FSE and its compounds were evaluated by in vitro and in vivo assays, including human estrogen receptor alpha (hERα) binding, estrogen response element (ERE)-luciferase reporter assays, and uterotrophic assays. FSE and its compounds 1–5 showed binding affinities for hERα and activated ERE transcription in MCF-7 cells. Additionally, FSE and compounds 1–5 induced MCF-7 cell proliferation and trefoil factor 1 (pS2) expression. In immature female rats, significant increases in uterine weight and pS2 gene were observed in FSE-treated groups. We identified estrogenic activities of FSE and its bioactive compounds, suggesting their possible roles as PEs via ERs. PEs derived from FSE are promising candidates for ER-targeted therapy for post-menopausal symptoms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The genus Flemingia belongs to the Fabaceae family. It is used in Asia and southern India as traditional medicine for the treatment of inflammation, cancer, and infections. Eighty species of Flemingia have been reported, including Flemingia bhutanica, Flemingia brevipes, Flemingia chappar, Flemingia macrophylla, Flemingia fruticulosa, Flemingia rhodocarpa, and Flemingia strobilifera (FS; The Plant List, 2010). The bark, leaves, flowers, and roots of these plants have been used in traditional medicine to treat a variety of illnesses, including epilepsy, dysentery, and diabetes mellitus (Cheyl 2006; Lans 2006; Gahlot et al. 2013). Among the Flemingia species, the effects of FS were reported in several studies; FS ethanol extract has shown anticonvulsant effects (Gahlot et al. 2013), analgesic activity (Kumar et al. 2011), and cytotoxicity against human leukemia cell lines (Ramcharan et al. 2010). Although previous studies have shown that flavonoids, flavonoid glycosides, chalcones, epoxy chromenes, and pterocarpans were the main constituents found in FS (Madan et al. 2008), it is still unknown whether FS includes compounds that can exert estrogenic effects.
Estrogen, a major female hormone, regulates various physiological responses in many target tissues including the breast, uterus, brain, and bone (Paganini-Hill and Henderson 1994; Riggs et al. 1998). Estrogen exerts its biological effects by binding to estrogen receptors (ERs). ERs are mainly present in the nucleus and bind to ligand-forming complexes. These complexes bind to estrogen response elements (EREs) that are located in the promoter regions of target genes and act as a transcription factors for target genes (Nilsson et al. 2001). Estrogen plays an important role in the development and progression of breast and endometrial cancers (Hayashi et al. 2003; Bryant et al. 2005). Recruitment of co-activators to the promoter regions of target genes, such as cathepsin D, pS2, and c-myc, stimulates the growth of breast cancer cells (Shang et al. 2000). Many tissues express cofactors and ER subtypes that possess various functions throughout the body. ER activity is differentially modulated by a range of ligands. Some of these ligands show agonistic or antagonistic effects depending on ER subtype and are described as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) (Shang and Brown 2002). A typical SERM used to treat estrogen-positive breast cancer is tamoxifen (Fisher et al. 1998; Jordan 2003). Tamoxifen acts as an antagonist in breast cancer, an agonist in the uterus, and a partial agonist in bones (Martinkovich et al. 2014). In the uterus, however, long-term treatment of tamoxifen is associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer due to its differential effects (Kedar et al. 1994; Wysowski et al. 2002; Shang 2006). Moreover, raloxifene is a second-generation SERM that has been approved for osteoporosis and breast cancer treatment; however, raloxifene is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism (Palacios 2010). Therefore, development of SERMs with low estrogenic activity, anti-estrogenic activity, or tissue-specific activity would offer pharmacological advantages for hormonal substitutes or as complements in breast cancer treatments.
Phytoestrogens (PEs) refer to natural products that possess SERM properties. PEs can be derived from the seeds, roots, stems, leaves, and flowers of plants. Isoflavones and lignans from soybean and wheat are well-known PEs. These PEs are relevant in the treatment of hormone-related female diseases and cardiovascular diseases (Tham et al. 1998). PEs may be prospective candidates for the treatment of women’s diseases due to their therapeutic efficacy and low side effect risks (Bhat and Pezzuto 2001). The PEs not only inhibit tumor growth, but also prevent heart disease, menopausal symptoms, and osteoporosis (Murkies et al. 1998; Mense et al. 2008). Additionally, PEs can function as SERMs whether or not they possess a steroidal structure (Moutsatsou 2007).
The present study aimed to determine the estrogenic properties of FS extract (FSE) and its compounds on MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line and immature female rat uteri. Five compounds were identified in FS fractions using NMR, HPLC, and MS. Binding affinity to hERα and ERE transcriptional activities of FSE was measured. Furthermore, cell proliferation of MCF-7 and pS2 gene expression was examined. The uterotrophic effects of FSE, as well as protein expression of ERα, progesterone receptor A/B (PRA/B), and pS2 mRNA levels were analyzed.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
Stems and leaves of Flemingia strobilifera were collected from the Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources in Binh Thuan province, Vietnam in 2012 and identified by Dr. Sei-Ryang Oh at the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB). A voucher specimen (access number FBM109-070) was deposited in the herbarium of the KRIBB.
Chemical analysis
Air-dried stems and leaves of Flemingia strobilifera (300 g) were pulverized and extracted with methanol to yield crude FSE (14.2 g). To identify bioactive constituents responsible for SERM efficacy, we fractionated FSE using reverse-phase silica column chromatography by eluting with a gradient mixture of H2O-MeOH (80:20–0:100). We collected 20 fractions (FS1–20) from FSE. Fractionation of FS5 by reverse-phase medium-pressure column chromatography (MPLC) with a mixture of MeOH/H2O (30:70) yielded compound 2 (83.5 mg, tR = 3.36 min). Compound 1 (46.1 mg, tR = 5.71 min) and compound 5 (55.3 mg, tR = 4.74 min) were purified from FS6 by reverse-phase MPLC with a mixture of MeOH/H2O (40:60). Chromatography of FS7 was performed on an HPLC column (YMC C18; 5 μm, 250 × 20 mm, 45% acetonitrile/H2O, 7 mL/min, 210 nm) to yield compound 3 (16.4 mg, tR = 31.57 min). Fractionation of FS8 by HPLC (YMC C18; 5 μm, 250 × 20 mm, acetonitrile/H2O 45% 20 min, acetonitrile/H2O 55% 35 min, 7 mL/min, 210 nm) yielded compound 4 (4.7 mg, tR = 41.05 min).
Cajanin (1): wite amorphous powder; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δH: 12.99 (1H, s, 5–OH), 9.38 (1H, br s, –OH), 9.30 (1H, br s, –OH), 8.23 (1H, s, H-2), 6.99 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-6′), 6.63 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, H-3′), 6.40 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-6), 6.37 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-8), 6.28 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 2.4 Hz, H-5′), 3.86 (3H, s, 7–OCH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δC: 156.2 (C-2), 121.1 (C-3), 181.0 (C-4), 162.1 (C-5), 98.3 (C-6), 165.5 (C-7), 92.8 (C-8), 158.0 (C-9), 105.9 (C-10), 108.2 (C-1′), 156.9 (C-2′), 103.0 (C-3′), 159.1 (C-4′), 106.7 (C-5′), 132.6 (C-6′), 56.5 (7–OCH3); HRTOFESIMS m/z 299.0567 [M−H]− (calcd for C16H11O6−: 299.0561).
2′-Hydroxygenistein (2): white amorphous powder; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δH: 7.99 (1H, s, H-2), 7.03 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-6′), 6.39 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, H-3′), 6.36 (1H, d, J = 8.4, 2.4 Hz, H-5′), 6.34 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, H-8), 6.21 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, H-6); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δC: 156.9 (C-2), 122.7 (C-3), 182.8 (C-4), 163.8 (C-5), 100.3 (C-6), 166.1 (C-7), 94.9 (C-8), 159.9 (C-9), 106.3 (C-10), 110.9 (C-1′), 158.0 (C-2′), 104.4 (C-3′), 160.4 (C-4′), 108.2 (C-5′), 133.3 (C-6′); HRTOFESIMS m/z: 285.0402 [M−H]− (calcd for C15H9O6−: 285.0405).
Pisatin (3): colorless oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δH: 7.33 (1H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-5), 6.82 (1H, s, H-6′), 6.62 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 2.4 Hz, H-6), 6.42 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, H-8), 6.35 (1H, s, H-3′), 5.90 (1H, d, J = 1.0 Hz, 1″a), 5.87 (1H, d, J = 1.0 Hz, 1″b), 5.20 (1H, s, H-4), 4.10 (1H, d, J = 11.6 Hz, H-2b), 3.95 (1H, d, J = 11.6 Hz, H-2a), 3.75 (3H, s, 7–OCH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δC: 70.8 (C-2), 77.8 (C-3), 86.1 (C-4), 133.2 (C-5), 110.3 (C-6), 162.6 (C-7), 102.5 (C-8), 157.5 (C-9), 114.3 (C-10), 121.6 (C-1′), 155.9 (C-2′), 94.7 (C-3′), 151.0 (C-4′), 143.7 (C-5′), 104.5 (C-6′), 55.9 (7-OCH3), 102.9 (C-1″); HRTOFESIMS m/z: 313.0716 [M−H]− (calcd for C17H13O6−: 313.0718).
2′,3′,4′,6′-Tetramethoxychalcone (4): colorless oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δH: 7.58 (2H, m, H-2, 6), 7.39 (3H, m, H-3, 4, 5), 7.31 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, H-β), 6.97 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, H-α), 6.53 (1H, s, H-5′), 3.92 (3H, s, -OMe), 3.81 (3H, s, -OMe), 3.783 (3H, s, -OMe), 3.777 (3H, s, -OMe);13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δC: 136.1 (C-1), 129.7 (C-2, 6), 130.2 (C-3, 5), 131.9 (C-4), 129.9 (C-α), 147.3 (C-β), 196.0 (C = O), 117.1 (C-1′), 152.9 (C-2′), 137.3 (C-3′), 157.0 (C-4′ or C-6′), 94.1 (C-5′), 154.9 (C-4′ or C-6′), 62.4 (2′–OCH3), 61.6 (3′–OCH3), 56.9 (4′ or 6′–OCH3), 56.8 (4′ or 6′-OCH3); HRTOFESIMS m/z: 373.1310 [M+COOH]− (calcd forC20H21O7−: 373.1293).
Genistein (5): white amorphous powder; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δH: 8.02 (1H, s, H-2), 7.36 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-2′, 6′), 6.83 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-3′, 5′), 6.31 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-8), 6.20 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-6); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) δC: 154.9 (C-2), 124.9 (C-3), 182.4 (C-4), 164.0 (C-5), 100.2 (C-6), 166.1 (C-7), 94.9 (C-8), 159.8 (C-9), 106.4 (C-10), 123.4 (C-1′), 131.5 (C-2′, 6′), 116.4 (C-3′, 5′), 159.0 (C-4′); HRTOFESIMS m/z: 269.0457 [M−H]− (calcd forC15H10O5−: 269.0455).
Animals
All animal studies were performed in accordance with the guidelines stated by the Korean Food and Drug Administration. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC, SMWU-IACUC-1703-004) of Sookmyung Women’s University. Immature female Sprague–Dawley rats (20–21 days old) with body weights ranging from 38–48 g were obtained from the Samtaco Animal Farm (Osan, Korea). All animals were housed in a purpose-built facility with a controlled environment and maintained in an isolator in which a control was set to keep temperature and relative humidity at 23 ± 2 °C and 50 ± 10%, respectively. Artificial lighting provided a 24 h cycle of 12:12 h light and dark.
Uterotrophic assay
Flemingia strobilifera was tested in vivo to determine its ability to induce uterine weight gain in immature rats. Immature female Sprague–Dawley rats (20–21 days old) with body weights ranging from 38–48 g were housed under standard animal laboratory conditions with ad libitum access to food and water. Animals were randomly divided into three groups, with group body weights within 10% of the population mean. Animals were subcutaneously injected daily for a period of 3 days with (i) corn oil (5 mL/kg; vehicle control), (ii) 17β-Estradiol (E2, 3 μg/5 mL/kg; positive control), or (iii) Flemingia strobilifera (300 mg/5 mL/kg). Each treatment group consisted of 10 rats. On day 4, the animals were weighed and euthanized. The uteri were quickly removed and the connective tissues were excised. Then, uteri were nicked, blotted, and weighed. The effects of Flemingia strobilifera treatment on uterus wet weight were determined by reporting absolute uterine weights normalized to rat respective body weights.
Cell culture and materials
MCF-7 cells were kindly provided by Dr. Anna Soto (Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA). MCF-7 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic solution. Cells were maintained in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. All cell culture reagents were purchased from Gibco (Carlsbad, CA, USA). [2,4,6,7-3H]-17β-Estradiol ([3H]-E2, 88.0 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Perkin Elmer Inc. (Boston, MA, USA). Reagents and chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and unless stated otherwise, were of research grade suiratio for cell culture or of the highest grade available. All chemicals were dissolved in DMSO before being tested in the various assay systems. Stock solutions were stored at − 30 °C. The final solvent concentration in the culture medium did not exceed 0.5%.
ER ligand-binding assay
Binding abilities to recombinant full-length human estrogen receptor α (hERα) was assessed as described previously (Obourn et al. 1993). Recombinant hERα (2010 pmol/mg, Invitrogen Corp, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was diluted to a concentration of 3 nM with a binding buffer containing 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, and 1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA). hERα was incubated with [3H]-E2 (5 nM) in the presence or absence of 10−6–10−13 M unlabeled E2 and various concentrations of FSE and bioactive compounds. After incubation for 2 h at 28 °C, the reactions were terminated by rapid filtration through glass-fiber filters (Packard Instrument B.V. Chemical Operations, The Netherlands) presoaked in ice-cold 0.05% polyethylenimine solution using a PerkinElmer Filter Mate Harvester. The filters were washed five times with ice-cold washing buffer containing 40 mM Tris (pH 7.5) and 100 mM KCl. Then, the filters were dried and placed in scintillation vials containing 3 mL of Packard Ultima Gold scintillation cocktail. After shaking and overnight equilibration of the vials, the radioactivity trapped on each filter was measured using a Packard 2000CA liquid scintillation counter. Non-specific [3H]-E2 binding was determined in the presence of 10−6–10−13 M unlabeled E2. The specific binding percentage for hERα was determined as follows: [(dpmsample − dpmnon specific)/(dpmcontrol − dpmnon specific)] × 100 (%). RBA was calculated as follows: RBA = [IC50(E2)/IC50(sample)] × 100 (%). The results for each treatment condition were expressed as the mean ± standard error (SE).
ERE-luciferase reporter gene assay
ERE transcription activity was assessed as described previously (Obourn et al. 1993). MCF-7 cells were seeded in 24-well plates (3 × 105 cells/well) and cultured in phenol red-free DMEM containing 10% charcoal–dextran-treated FBS (CD-FBS) in triplicate. MCF-7 cells were then transiently transfected with recombinant plasmids that contain ERE-luciferase (luc) sequences (0.5 μg/well) and with 0.2 μg of an inactive control plasmid encoding a β-galactosidase gene using Lipofectamine 2000 Reagent (Invitrogen). The pERE-Luc plasmid contains three copies of the Xenopus laevis vitellogenin A2 ERE upstream of firefly luciferase (a gift from Dr. V. C. Jordan, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University). One day after transfection, cells were exposed to vehicle (0.1% DMSO), E2 (10−9 M), ICI182,780 (ICI; pure ER antagonist, 10−6 M), E2 + ICI, genistein (Gen; 10−6 M), FSE (1–10 μg/mL), FSE (10 μg/mL) + ICI, or compound 1–5 (0.5–20 μM) for 24 h. Cells were lysed for luciferase activity analysis after incubation for 24 h. Luciferase activity was measured using a luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Luminescence was detected with a TD-20/20 luminometer (Turner Design, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Finally, luciferase activities were normalized to β-galactosidase activity.
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)
To confirm if FSE and its bioactive compounds activated transcription of target genes, we examined expression of the pS2 gene. Total mRNA was isolated from uteri obtained from the uterotrophic assay and MCF-7 cells. After chopping and homogenizing, uteri or cells were incubated with TRIzol reagent (Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 5 min at 25 °C. Then, 300 μL of chloroform was added, followed by incubation for 3 min at 25 °C. After centrifugation at ≥ 10,000×g (13,000 rpm) and 4 °C for 30 min, the supernatant was collected. Isopropanol was added to the collected supernatant and then centrifugation was conducted at ≥ 10,000×g (13,000 rpm) and 4 °C for 15 min. The supernatant was discarded and the pellets were dissolved in DEPC water. Using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total mRNA. cDNA, a pair of primers capable of recognizing cDNA target genes, and the PCR SYBR Green kit (Bio-Rad) reagent were mixed. Quantitative gene expression of target genes was analyzed by the Applied Biosystem 7500 Realtime PCR system (Life technologies). To normalize experimental errors of several steps, gene expression of GAPDH (housekeeping gene) was analyzed at the same time. The ratio of target gene expression and housekeeping gene expression was used for determining quantitative gene expression. The primers used were, rGAPDH forward 5′-CTCTCTGCTCCTCCTGTTCGAC and reverse 5′-TGAGCGATGTGGCTCGGCT; rpS2 forward 5′-GGAAAAGGGTTGCTGTTTTG and reverse 5′-ACAGGTGTGTATGAAGCAGGTG; hGAPDH forward 5′-GGCTGAGAACGGGAAGCTTGTCAT and reverse 5′-CAGCCTTCTCCATGGTGGTGAAGA; hpS2 forward 5′-CGTGAAAGAC AGAATTGTGGTTTT and reverse 5′-CGTCGAAACAGCAGCCCTTA; mGAPDH forward 5′-TGCCAAGTATGATGACATCAAGAA and reverse 5′-GCCCAAGATGCCCTTCAGT. qPCR consisted of 40 cycles (95 °C, 30 s; 60 °C, 30 s; 72 °C, 30 s for pS2). Each gene expression curve was presented as a logarithm and the threshold cycles (CT) were calculated mathematically. The values were substituted in \(- 2^{{\Delta \Delta C_{T} }}\) and relative gene expression was calculated.
Western blotting
After behavioral tests, animals were sacrificed and uteri tissues were collected for western blot analysis. Whole protein was extracted from uteri and brain tissues. Uteri and brains were separately digested with lysis buffer containing protease inhibitor and phosphatase inhibitor. Protein concentration was determined by the BCA assay, then 20 μg of the protein was loaded onto 7.5% SDS-PAGE gels. Electrophoresis was performed for 2 h at 80 V. Next, the protein was transferred onto a PVDF membrane for 3 h at 25 V. After blocking the membrane with BSA solution, the primary antibody was incubated with the membrane at 4 °C overnight. After washing the membrane with TPBS (phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 0.1% Tween 20), the secondary antibody was added and the membrane was incubated for 1 h at 25 °C. Enhanced Chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was then used to detect target proteins (Amersham™ Imager 600 (GE Healthcare Biosciences; Pittsburg PA). For primary antibodies, 1:500 dilutions of ERα (sc-7207, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA) and PRA/B (sc-538, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were used. β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich) was used to normalize target protein expression.
MCF-7 cell proliferation assay
Cell proliferation was assessed as described previously (Soto and Sonnenschein 1985). MCF-7 cells were plated in 96-well plates at an initial density of 1 × 104 cells/well. After 24 h, vehicle, E2, genistein, ICI, E2 + ICI, FSE + ICI, or bioactive compounds were added to the experimental medium (phenol red-free DMEM containing 10% CD-FBS and the cells were incubated for 2 days (late exponential phase). Cell growth was determined using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error (SE). Comparisons between groups were performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with appropriate Newman-Keuls methods using the GraphPad Prism Software (San Diego, CA, USA). A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Isoflavones, pterocarpans, and chalcones were identified in FSEs through phytochemical analysis
Twenty fractions were separated from FSE by liquid chromatography and tested for their hERα binding abilities and ERE transcription activation. Among the 20 fractions, FS5, FS6, FS7, FS8, and FS20 showed over 60% binding affinity for hERα (data not shown). FS5, FS6, FS7, and FS8 were selected for further studies due to their binding affinity for hERα and their ERE transcriptional activity. Fractionation of FS5 by reverse-phase MPLC with a mixture of MeOH-H2O (30:70) yielded compound 2 (83.5 mg, tR = 3.36 min). Compound 1 (46.1 mg, tR = 5.71 min) and compound 5 (55.3 mg, tR = 4.74 min) were purified by reverse-phase MPLC with a mixture of MeOH-H2O (40:60) from FS6. Chromatography of FS7 was performed on an HPLC column (YMC C18; 5 μm, 250 × 20 mm, 45% ACN, 7 mL/min, 210 nm) to yield compound 3 (16.4 mg tR = 31.57 min). Fractionation of FS8 by HPLC (YMC C18; 5 μm, 250 × 20 mm, ACN 45% 20 min, ACN 55% 35 min, 7 mL/min, 210 nm) yielded compound 4 (4.7 mg, tR = 41.05 min). The structures of the compounds were identified as cajanin (1) (Waffo et al. 2000), 2′-hydroxygenistein (2) (Uchida et al. 2015), pisatin (3) (Hegazy et al. 2011), 2′,3′,4′,6′-tetramethoxychalcone (4) (Panichpol and Waterman 1978), and genistein (5) (Coward et al. 1993) on the basis of MS, 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data, and literature comparison. Chemical characteristics of the five compounds are summarized in Table 1.
FSE and its compounds bind to recombinant hERα and activate ERE transcription in MCF-7 cells
To examine the estrogenic properties of FSE and its five bioactive compounds, we evaluated their hERα binding affinity and ERE transcriptional activity. Binding affinity of FSE for hERα was determined by a competitive binding assay using [3H]-E2 and recombinant purified hERα. FSE exhibited a binding affinity for hERα that increased in a dose-dependent manner with an IC50 value of 1.6 × 10−5 g/mL (Table 1). At concentrations of 10−5 g/mL, FSE competitively inhibited 83% of [3H]-E2 binding to hERα. The binding affinities were expressed as relative bioavailability (RBA) values, with an RBA value of the E2 standard set to 100. E2 showed binding affinity for hERα with an IC50 value of 7.68 × 10−9 M (Table 1). The RBA value of FSE for hERα was 0.048. Compounds 1, 2, 4, and 5 exhibited binding affinities for hERα with IC50 values ranging from 10−7 to 10−5 M (Table 1). Compound 2 has potent binding affinities with an IC50 value of 0.46 μM for hERα. The RBA values of compounds 1, 2, and 4 for hERα were 0.014, 0.931, and 0.515, respectively.
The estrogenic activities of FSE and its compounds on ERE transcription were evaluated by ERE-luciferase reporter gene assays in MCF-7 cells. Cells were treated with FSE, ER agonist E2 (10−9–10−12 M; positive control), ER antagonist ICI (10−6 M; negative control), or DMSO (0.1% v/v; vehicle control) and incubated for 24 h. Then, ERE transcriptional activity was evaluated by the luciferase assay. As shown in Fig. 1, E2, FSE, and FSE compounds 1–5 activated ERE transcription in a dose-dependent manner. Compounds 1, 2, 3, and 5 dose-dependently increased ERE transcriptional activities and E2 and genistein activated ERE transcription as well, indicating functional agonistic properties (Fig. 1a, b). Our results indicate that FSE and its compounds activate ERE transcriptional activity via ER binding.
FSE and its bioactive compounds induced cell proliferation and pS2 mRNA expression in MCF-7 cells
To evaluate the effects of FSE and its bioactive compounds on MCF-7 cell proliferation, an MTT assay was performed. FSE induced cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner in a concentration range of 10−8–10−4 g/mL. E2 and genistein increased cell proliferation twofold compared with vehicle control. Compound 1 strongly induced MCF-7 cell proliferation by threefold, while compounds 2, 3, and 5 significantly increased cell proliferation by approximately 2.5-fold in a concentration range of 10−5–10−6 M (Fig. 2a). To determine if FSE regulates nuclear ERα activity in MCF-7 cells, we examined mRNA levels of the ERα target gene, pS2. E2 and genistein increased pS2 mRNA expression by approximately 1.5-fold compared with the vehicle. pS2 mRNA expression was upregulated by FSE at concentrations of 10−7–10−5 g/mL (Fig. 2b). At a concentration of 10−5 g/mL, compounds 1, 2, 3, and 5 increased pS2 mRNA levels by more than 1.2-fold compared with the vehicle (Fig. 2b).
FSE induces a uterotrophic effect in association with ERα, PRA/B protein expression, and pS2 mRNA levels in immature rats
The uterotrophic response to FSE was measured based on the increase in uterine tissue mass in immature rats. Since uteri express ERs, E2 induces cell proliferation of uterine tissue, leading to uterine weight gain. E2 increased uterine weight when administered subcutaneously to rats. Blotted uterine weights normalized to body weights were 1.97-fold higher in rats treated with 0.003 mg/kg E2 than in rats of the vehicle group (Table 2). FSE (300 mg/kg) increased uterine weight significantly compared with the vehicle group (Table 2). The impact of FSE treatment on ERα and PRA/B expression in the rat uterus was examined by western blotting (Fig. 3a). In the uterus of immature rats treated with 0.003 mg/kg E2, ERα protein expression decreased by approximately 44% (Fig. 3b); this is in accordance with the decrease in ERα protein expression by E2 in MCF-7 cells (Gierthy et al. 1996). ERα protein expression decreased by approximately 38% after FSE treatment (Fig. 3b). Interestingly, FSE increased protein expression of PRA and PRB in the uterus compared with the vehicle group. We further examined if FSE affects mRNA levels of the ERα target gene, pS2. mRNA expression of pS2 significantly increased after FSE treatment, compared with the vehicle group (Fig. 3c). These results show that FSE regulates ERα, PRA/B protein expression, and pS2 mRNA expression, exerting a uterotrophic effect in immature rats.
Discussion
Although previous studies reported on the pharmacological activities of FS, the estrogenic property of FS remained unknown. In the present study, we analyzed phytochemical components and evaluated the estrogenic effects of FSE and its compounds. Our bioassay-guided isolation of FSE led to the purification of cajanin (1), 2-hydroxygenistein (2), pisatin (3), 2′,3′,4′,6′-tetramethoxychalcone (4), and genistein (5).
To elucidate the estrogenic properties of FS, we examined the effect of FSE and bioactive compounds on hERα binding affinity, ERE transcriptional activity, MCF-7 cell proliferation, and pS2 mRNA expression. FSE and its compounds 1, 2, 3, and 5 showed binding affinities to hERs and dose dependently increased cell proliferation as well as pS2 mRNA expression in MCF-7 cells. Furthermore, we examined in vivo estrogenic properties of FSE in immature female rats. FSE treatment increased uterine weight and regulated ERα, PRA, and PRB protein expression. Expression of pS2 mRNA in rat uteri was significantly increased in the FSE-treated group as well. Our results indicate that FSE and its bioactive compounds have estrogenic properties in vitro and in vivo and possibly act as PEs via ERs.
Using bioassay-guided analysis, we identified five PEs (compounds 1–5) that have binding affinities for hERα and ERE transcriptional activity. Compounds 1, 2, and 5 belong to the isoflavone family. Compounds 3 and 4 belong to the pterocarpan and chalcone family, respectively. Identification of isoflavones and flavonoids, such as genistein, daidzein, and naringin, was reported for the root and stems of FS (Madan et al. 2009; Yang et al. 2016). In the present study, our chemical analysis of FSE included isoflavones such as cajanin, 2-hydrogygenistein, and genistein. Moreover, we further discovered the presence of pterocarpan and chalcone family compounds, pisatin and 2′,3′,4′,6′-tetramethoxychalcone, respectively. Recently, chemical compositions of Flemingia philippinensis were reported to show aromatase inhibitory activities (Sun et al. 2017). Consistent with our results, phyto-SERM constituents and activities of Flemingia macrophylla were also reported (Lai et al. 2013), as these are common properties of Flemingia genus plants. To our knowledge, however, this study is the first to report on the estrogenic properties of FS.
Our results on hERα ligand binding and ERE transcription assays imply that bioactive constituents of FS may act as agonists or partial agonists of ERα in a tissue-specific manner. There are two subtypes of ERs, ERα and ERβ, that form homodimers and heterodimers following ligand binding (Björnström and Sjöberg 2005). The tissue distribution of ERα is different from that of ERβ. For example, Taylor and Al-Azzawi found that ERα is mainly expressed in endometrium glandular epithelia (Taylor and Al-Azzawi 2000), while both ERα and ERβ are present in rat uterine glands (Saunders et al. 1997). PE interactions with ERs have different efficacies and safety profiles in the breast, bone, and uterus depending on the tissue and its environment (Patisaul and Jefferson 2010; Komm and Mirkin 2014). To assess PE properties of FS in breast tissue, the MCF-7 cell line was used due to its high expression of ERs. Estrogenic properties of FSE and its PEs in MCF-7 cells were examined by measuring cell proliferation and pS2 mRNA expression. Compounds 1, 2, 3, and 5 increased MCF-7 cell proliferation and pS2 mRNA expression; therefore, FSE and bioactive compounds possibly act as PEs via ERs in breast cells. Additionally, we uncovered a uterotrophic effect of FSE in immature female rats. FSE PEs may bind to ERs in the uterus and activate transcription of target genes, resulting in increased uterine cell proliferation. Genistein, a soy PE, strongly binds to ERs (Morito et al. 2001) and induces fluid accumulation in ovariectomized rat uteri (Chinigarzadeh et al. 2014). Hertrampf et al. reported that subcutaneous injections of genistein increased uterine wet weight in ovariectomized rats (Hertrampf et al. 2009). In our study, we also observed fluid accumulation in FSE-treated rat uteri. This uterotrophic response induced by FSE may be related to the action of its PEs. ERα protein expression in the uterus was downregulated after treatment with FSE or E2, similar to the decreased ERα protein expression by E2 in MCF-7 cells (Gierthy et al. 1996). On the other hand, it is unclear if FSE increased PRA and PRB protein expression directly or indirectly in the uterus. Saegusa and Okayasu suggested that alteration of ERα expression is related to the regulation of PRs during endometrial tumorigenesis (Saegusa and Okayasu 2000), and PRA reportedly regulates the activity of a number of ERs (Wen et al. 1994). It is possible that decreased ERα protein expression induced by FSE regulates the expression or activity of PRA/B. Further experiments are needed to elucidate the progestogenic mechanisms and functions of FSE in the uterus.
Our results demonstrate that FSE and its bioactive compounds (compounds 1–5) exhibit estrogenic properties. They showed hERα binding affinity and ERE transcriptional activity, as well as increased proliferation and pS2 mRNA expression in MCF-7 cells. In addition, FSE led to uterotrophic effects in immature rats. These results reveal the estrogenic effects of FSE in breast and uterine cells.
In the present study, we examined estrogenic properties of FSE in vitro and in vivo for the first time, and provided insights into the estrogenic effects of PEs—derived from FSE—via estrogen receptors. An expanded understanding of tissue specificity and the molecular mechanisms of FSE and its compounds will prompt the development of FSE as a novel agent or promising candidate for the treatment of menopausal symptoms.
References
Bhat KP, Pezzuto JM (2001) Natural modulators of estrogen biosynthesis and function as chemopreventive agents. Arch Pharm Res 24:473–484
Björnström L, Sjöberg M (2005) Mechanisms of estrogen receptor signaling: convergence of genomic and nongenomic actions on target genes. Mol Endocrinol 19:833–842
Bryant W, Snowhite AE, Rice LW, Shupnik MA (2005) The estrogen receptor (ER)alpha variant Delta5 exhibits dominant positive activity on ER-regulated promoters in endometrial carcinoma cells. Endocrinology 146:751–759
Cheyl L (2006) Ethnomedicines used in trinidad and tobago for urinary problem and diabetes mellitus. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 13:45–51
Chinigarzadeh A, Kassim NM, Muniandy S, Salleh N (2014) Genistein-induced fluid accumulation in ovariectomised rats’ uteri is associated with increased cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator expression. Clinics 69:111–119
Coward L, Barnes NC, Setchell KD, Barnes S (1993) Genistein, daidzein, and their beta-glycoside conjugates: antitumor isoflavones in soybean foods from American and Asian diets. J Agric Food Chem 41:1961–1967
Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Kavanah M, Cronin WM, Vogel V, Robidoux A, Dimitrov N, Atkins J (1998) Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. JINCI-J Natl Cancer I 90:1371–1388
Gahlot K, Lal VK, Jha S (2013) Anticonvulsant potential of ethanol extracts and their solvent partitioned fractions from Flemingia strobilifera root. Pharmacogn Res 5:265–270
Gierthy JF, Spink BC, Figge HL, Pentecost BT, Spink DC (1996) Effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate and 17 beta-estradiol on estrogen receptor regulation in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. J Cell Biochem 60:173–184
Hayashi SI, Eguchi H, Tanimoto K, Yoshida T, Omoto Y, Inoue A, Yoshida N, Yamaguchi Y (2003) The expression and function of estrogen receptor alpha and beta in human breast cancer and its clinical application. Endocr-Relat Cancer 10:193–202
Hegazy ME, El-Hamd HMA, El-Halawany AM, Djemgou PC, Shahat AA, Pare PW (2011) Estrogenic activity of chemical constituents from Tephrosia candida. J Nat Prod 74:937–942
Hertrampf T, Schleipen B, Offermanns C, Velders M, Laudenbach U, Diel P (2009) Comparison of the bone protective effects of an isoflavone-rich diet with dietary and subcutaneous administrations of genistein in ovariectomized rats. Toxicol Lett 184:198–203
Jordan VC (2003) Tamoxifen: a most unlikely pioneering medicine. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2:205–213
Kedar R, Bourne T, Collins W, Campbell S, Powles T, Ashley S, Cosgrove D (1994) Effects of tamoxifen on uterus and ovaries of postmenopausal women in a randomised breast cancer prevention trial. Lancet 343:1318–1321
Komm BS, Mirkin S (2014) An overview of current and emerging SERMs. J Steroid Biochem 143:207–222
Kumar A, Gahlot K, Dora J, Singh P (2011) Analgesic activity of methanolic extract of flemingia strobilifera (R. Br). Int J Res Pharm Chem 1:825–827
Lai WC, Tsui YT, Singab AN, El-Shazly M, Du YC, Hwang TL, Wu CC, Yen MH, Lee CK, Hou MF, Wu YC, Chang FR (2013) Phyto-SERM constitutes from Flemingia macrophylla. Int J Mol Sci 14:15578–15594
Lans CA (2006) Ethnomedicines used in Trinidad and Tobago for urinary problems and diabetes mellitus. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2:1–11
Madan S, Singh G, Kumar Y, Kohli K, Singh R, Mir S, Ahmad S (2008) A new flavanone from Flemingia strobilifera (Linn) R. Br. and its antimicrobial activity. Trop J Pharm Res 7:921–927
Madan S, Singh GN, Kohli K, Ali M, Kumar Y, Singh RM, Prakash O (2009) Isoflavonoids from Flemingia strobilifera (L) R. Br. roots. Acta Pol Pharm 66:297–303
Martinkovich S, Shah D, Planey SL, Arnott JA (2014) Selective estrogen receptor modulators: tissue specificity and clinical utility. Clin Interv Aging 9:1437–1452
Mense SM, Hei TK, Ganju RK, Bhat HK (2008) Phytoestrogens and breast cancer prevention: possible mechanisms of action. Environ Health Persp 116:426–433
Morito K, Hirose T, Kinjo J, Hirakawa T, Okawa M, Nohara T, Ogawa S, Inoue S, Muramatsu M, Masamune Y (2001) Interaction of phytoestrogens with estrogen receptors alpha and beta. Biol Pharm Bull 24:351–356
Moutsatsou P (2007) The spectrum of phytoestrogens in nature: our knowledge is expanding. Hormones 6:173–193
Murkies AL, Wilcox G, Davis SR (1998) Clinical review 92: phytoestrogens. J Clin Endocr Metab 83:297–303
Nilsson S, Mäkelä S, Treuter E, Tujague M, Thomsen J, Andersson G, Enmark E, Pettersson K, Warner M, Gustafsson J (2001) Mechanisms of estrogen action. Physiol Rev 81:1535–1565
Obourn JD, Koszewski NJ, Notides AC (1993) Hormone- and DNA-binding mechanisms of the recombinant human estrogen receptor. Biochemistry 32:6229–6236
Paganini-Hill A, Henderson VW (1994) Estrogen deficiency and risk of Alzheimer’s disease in women. Am J Epidemiol 140:256–261
Palacios S (2010) Third generation SERMs: anything new? Maturitas 67:101–102
Panichpol K, Waterman PG (1978) Novel flavonoids from the stem of Popowia cauliflora. Phytochemistry 17:1363–1367
Patisaul HB, Jefferson W (2010) The pros and cons of phytoestrogens. Front Neuroendocrin 31:400–419
Ramcharan G, Clement YN, Maxwell AR (2010) Cytotoxic activity of selected West Indian medicinal plants against a human leukaemia cell line. W Indian Med J 59:597–601
Riggs BL, Khosla S, Melton LJ (1998) A unitary model for involutional osteoporosis: estrogen deficiency causes both type I and type II osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and contributes to bone loss in aging men. J Bone Miner Res 13:763–773
Saegusa M, Okayasu I (2000) Changes in expression of estrogen receptors alpha and beta in relation to progesterone receptor and pS2 status in normal and malignant endometrium. Jpn J Cancer Res: Gann 91:510–518
Saunders P, Maguire S, Gaughan J, Millar M (1997) Expression of oestrogen receptor beta (ER beta) in multiple rat tissues visualised by immunohistochemistry. J Endocrinol 154:R13–R16
Shang Y (2006) Molecular mechanisms of oestrogen and SERMs in endometrial carcinogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 6:360–368
Shang Y, Brown M (2002) Molecular determinants for the tissue specificity of SERMs. Science 295:2465–2468
Shang Y, Hu X, Direnzo J, Lazar MA, Brown M (2000) Cofactor dynamics and sufficiency in estrogen receptor–regulated transcription. Cell 103:843–852
Soto AM, Sonnenschein C (1985) The role of estrogens on the proliferation of human breast tumor cells (MCF-7). J Steroid Biochemist 23:87–94
Sun F, Li Q, Xu J (2017) Chemical composition of roots Flemingia philippinensis and Their inhibitory kinetics on aromatase. Chem Biodivers 14:1–9
Taylor A, Al-Azzawi F (2000) Immunolocalisation of oestrogen receptor beta in human tissues. J Mol Endocrinol 24:145–155
Tham DM, Gardner CD, Haskell WL (1998) Potential health benefits of dietary phytoestrogens: a review of the clinical, epidemiological, and mechanistic evidence 1. J Clin Endocr Metab 83:2223–2235
Uchida K, Akashi T, Aoki T (2015) Functional expression of cytochrome P450 in Escherichia coli: an approach to functional analysis of uncharacterized enzymes for flavonoid biosynthesis. Plant Biotechnol 3:205–213
Waffo AK, Azebaze GA, Nkengfack AE, Fomum ZT, Meyer M, Bodo B, Van Heerden FR (2000) Indicanines B and C, two isoflavonoid derivatives from the root bark of Erythrina indica. Phytochemistry 53:981–985
Wen DX, Xu YF, Mais DE, Goldman ME, Mcdonnell DP (1994) The A and B isoforms of the human progesterone receptor operate through distinct signaling pathways within target cells. Mol Cell Biol 14:8356–8364
Wysowski DK, Honig SF, Beitz J (2002) Uterine sarcoma associated with tamoxifen use. New Engl J Med 346:1832–1833
Yang R-Y, Wang X-Z, Wei B, Zhou D-X, Xu W-F, Liang H, Chen Z-F, Li J (2016) Chemical constituents of the stems of Flemingia strobilifera. Chem Nat Compd 52:139–141
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korean government (MRC, No. 2011-0030074; NRF-2016K1A1A8A01939090; NRF-2016K2A9A2A06004949).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jeong, SY., Chang, M., Choi, Sh. et al. Estrogenic effects of phytoestrogens derived from Flemingia strobilifera in MCF-7 cells and immature rats. Arch. Pharm. Res. 41, 519–529 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-018-1027-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-018-1027-1