Introduction

Denitrification is a dissimilatory nitrate reduction process in that nitrate or nitrite (NO3 or NO2 ) is reduced anaerobically to N2 by heterotrophic facultative anaerobic bacteria. Denitrification requires an anoxic environment and a source of both organic matter and nitrate (Mosier et al. 2002, 2010). As available fixed nitrogen in sediments is mostly in the form of ammonium (NH4 +), sediment denitrification depends on local rates of nitrification (Newcomer et al. 2012) unless there is a flux of nitrate into the sediment from the overlying bottom waters.

Nitrate produced in the aerobic zone (or nitrate from the overlying water) diffuses into the suboxic zone where denitrification occurs (Nielsen et al. 1990; Risgaard-Petersen 2003). This process combination is commonly referred to as coupled nitrification–denitrification, while denitrification supported by the physical influx of nitrate is referred to as direct denitrification (An and Joye 2001; Fennel et al. 2009). According to Fennel et al. (2009), sediment oxygen consumption (SOC) should be an effective predictor of sediment denitrification. The depth of the aerobic zone in aquatic sediments is directly affected by SOC, which is associated with organic matter decomposition and nitrification (Seitzinger et al., 2006; Small et al. 2014).

Coastal aquatic environments are among aquatic systems with the highest degree of eutrophication, derived from increased nutrient inputs (Vidal et al. 1999; Song et al. 2014), and these environments present some of the highest reported denitrification values (Herbert 1999). Boesch (2002) reported that 67 % of the combined surface area of US estuaries exhibited moderate to high degrees of eutrophication and similar results have emerged in Europe and other continents (Duarte et al. 2009).

Freshwater systems are assumed to account for approximately 20 % of the total global denitrification (Seitzinger et al. 2006) because sediment denitrification is the major pathway of fixed N loss from natural and human-altered aquatic systems. However, Burgin and Hamilton (2007) question if the relative role of denitrification as a removal pathway has been overestimated over the years. It has to be noted that denitrification in lake sediments has been widely studied in temperate and boreal environments, but studies in tropical lake sediments are scarce and very little data is available (Pina-Ochoa and Alvarez-Cobelas 2006; Solomon et al. 2009). This is even more evident for denitrification measurements in coastal lagoons.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative importance of denitrification rates and its relation with oxygen consumption and other regulatory factors in two contrasting tropical shallow lagoons with different trophic states.

Study Area

The Imboassica (22° 25′ S and 42° 56′ W) and Cabiúnas Lagoons (22° 00′ S and 42° 00′ W) are situated in the north coast of Rio de Janeiro state (southeast of Brazil, Fig. 1). This area has minimum and maximum monthly mean temperatures ranging from 20.7 °C in July to 26.2 °C in February (Inmet 1992). Both the Imboassica and Cabiúnas Lagoons are elongated perpendicularly to the coastline, are shallow and relatively close to each other (30 km), and have a similar watershed size (50 and 45 km2, respectively).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of the region. The studied lagoons are indicated by their names

The Imboassica Lagoon, with an area of 3.26 km2, is located in a quaternary fluvio-marine plain where the tropical forest was logged (Cprm 2000). The predominant land use in the watershed of this lake is extensive pasture, but the lake receives important nutrient inputs from urban sources. Sewage discharges contributed to eutrophication of the Imboassica Lagoon mainly after 1995 (Esteves 1998). Imboassica was classified as mesotrophic to eutrophic during the study period. The Cabiúnas Lake is smaller (0.34 km2) and less impacted by human activities because it is located within a conservation area (Restinga de Jurubatiba National Park). This ecosystem is located in a quaternary marine sandy plain where the original terrestrial vegetation (named Restinga) is preserved (Cprm 2000). Cabiúnas was classified as oligotrophic during the study period. Some limnological characteristics for the Imboassica and Cabiúnas Lagoons during the studied period are presented in Table 1. Both lagoons present carbonate sediments with some level of bioirrigation. They present submerged aquatic macrophytes, but only in the margins. More information about both lagoons can be found at Marotta et al. (2010).

Table 1 Limnological characteristics of the study sites. Values are means ± SE (minimum–maximum) from February to October 2001.

Materials and Methods

Denitrification, SOC, and nitrate and ammonium fluxes were measured monthly from February to October 2001 according to Dalsgaard et al. (2000). During each month, water (Van Dorn bottle) and big sediment cores (Kajak core sampler) were collected from the central region of each lagoon, without the presence of submerged macrophytes. Smaller sediment cores (Plexiglas cores, 15.8 × 3.6 cm) were carefully subsampled from the big cores in the field and immediately transported to the field laboratory.

In the field lab, the small cores were fixed in two big containers (ca. 50 L), one for each lagoon, with a stirring system specially designed to start–end incubations. In each lagoon, we incubated eight cores with stirring systems (five with sediment and water and three only with water). In each container, the cores were completely covered with lagoon water, that was kept circulating with aquarium pumps to maintain oxygen concentration at saturation level. All cores were kept under these aerated conditions at lagoon in situ temperature during 2 to 4 h for stabilization. Temperature in the cores did not change more than 2 °C during the whole stabilization and incubation period. All incubations were performed in the dark. Sediment oxygen consumption was used as a proxy of site aerobic mineralization (Dalsgaard et al. 2000).

The sediment fluxes of nitrate, ammonium, and oxygen were determined with a total incubation from 1 to 2 h at the Imboassica and 2 to 4 h at the Cabiúnas Lagoons. Oxygen consumption was only measured when oxygen final concentration was never lower than 80 % saturation (Dalsgaard et al. 2000). After measuring the nitrate, ammonium, and oxygen fluxes, the cores were kept open under the water inside the big containers for another period of stabilization of 3 h before addition of 15NO3 , indicating the beginning of denitrification incubation. Denitrification rates were obtained through the isotopic paring technique (IPT) proposed by Nielsen (1992) and after addition of 1 ml 15NO3 (5 mM) to each sediment core yielding a concentration of approximately 100 μM in the water column. This relatively high concentration of added 15NO3 , allows the determination of very low denitrification rates, because the mass spectrometer is sensitive enough to measure small increases of 29N2 concentrations. In this study, the detection limit was 0.01 μmol N2 m−2 h−1.

We waited a period of 5 to 10 min for 15NO3 equilibration. After the incubation of 1 to 2 and 2 to 4, respectively, in the Imboassica and Cabiúnas Lagoons, we ended the denitrification incubation by adding some drops of ZnCl2 (1 mM) and mixing the sediment and the water in the core. After 1 min, we sampled 20 mL of the slurry and transferred to 12-mL Exetainers with 100 μL ZnCl2 (1 mM) for preservation. Within a week, 3 mL of the water inside the Exetainers was replaced with He and the Exetainers were kept at 4 °C until analysis at the University of Aarhus (Denmark).

Assuming random mixture of the added 15NO3 with 14NO3 in the water and produced in the sediment by nitrification, the formation of 29N2 (14N15N) and 30N2 (15N15N) by the end of the incubation was used to calculate actual denitrification rates and Dn (coupled nitrification–denitrification) and Dw (denitrification from nitrate from the water column) fractions (Nielsen 1992), because the mass spectrometer can measure as long as the lower measurements performed at this study.

Oxygen, temperature, and salinity concentrations were measured in the field and in the laboratory with an oxymeter (YSI-55). Nitrate, nitrite, phosphate, and chlorophyll-a were measured according to Golterman et al. (1978) and ammonium according to Bower and Holmhansen (1980). Nitrogen isotope species were analyzed in a mass spectrometer (Europa Scientific) at the University of Aarhus (Denmark).

The sediment oxygen consumption values from both lagoons presented a Gaussian distribution (normality test, p < 0.05) and were compared using the unpaired t test at the 5 % level. The denitrification rates and nitrate and ammonium fluxes presented no Gaussian distribution (normality test, p < 0.05). We compared the denitrification rates with the Mann–Whitney test (p < 0.05). The Dn and Dw fractions were compared through the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s posttest, which were both evaluated at the 5 % level.

Results

The denitrification rates were very low in both environments and never reached values higher than 5.0 μmol N2 m−2 h−1. Imboassica and Cabiúnas denitrification rates varied from 0.21 to 1.7 and 0.01 to 4.3 μmol N2 m−2 h−1 (Fig. 2a, b), respectively. The denitrification rates were slightly higher in the Cabiúnas Lagoon in the first 3 months of the study, but as a whole, there was not a significant difference (Mann–Whitney, p < 0.05) between the lagoons.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Denitrification (a and b) and Dn (white bars) and Dw (shaded bars) rates; sediment oxygen consumption (SOC) (c and d) rates. Positive and negative ammonium (NH4 +) (e and f) and nitrate (NO3 ) fluxes (g and b) indicate, respectively, sediment release and consumptionfor data obtained for the Imboassica (a, c, e, and g) and Cabiúnas (b, d, f, and h) Lagoons. Symbols represent mean and SEM. Note differences in scales

Sediment oxygen consumption was significantly higher in the Imboassica than in the Cabiúnas Lagoon (t test, p < 0.05). Imboassica and Cabiúnas SOC rates varied from 1838 to 4248 and from 426 to 1294 μmol O2 m−2 h−1 (Fig. 2c, d), respectively.

Ammonium and nitrate fluxes were very variable in the Imboassica and Cabiúnas Lagoons being more intense and with higher fluxes at the first one. NH4 + fluxes varied from a release of 1212.9 μmol NH4 + m−2 h−1 in March 2001 to an assimilation of 347.5 μmol NH4 + m−2 h−1 in May 2001 in the Imboassica and from a release of 54.3 μmol NH4 + m−2 h−1 in March 2001 to an assimilation of 51.7 μmol NH4 + m−2 h−1 in August 2001 in the Cabiúnas Lagoon (Fig. 2e, f). NO3 fluxes also varied from sediment release to assimilation in both lagoons, but this variation was in a lower range than the NH4 + fluxes (Fig. 2g, h). There was not a clear pattern of assimilation or release of NH4 + and NO3 , neither a correlation of these fluxes with denitrification or SOC rates. The relative dominance of the Dn over the Dw fraction was observed in both lagoons (Fig. 2a, b). Both environments presented a significant relationship (F test, p < 0.05) between coupled nitrification–denitrification rates (Dn) and SOC (Fig. 3). However, the slope of this relationship and the R value were higher in the Cabiúnas than in the Imboassica Lagoon.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Linear regression between Dn and sediment oxygen consumption (SOC) rates in the Imboassica (black circle, N = 47) and Cabiúnas (white circle, N = 31) sediment. Both relationships are significant at the 5 % level (F test)

The water nitrate concentrations were below 2.0 μM at all sampling months in both lagoons. Ammonium concentrations were also lower than 2.0 μM during all sampling months in the Cabiúnas Lagoon. However, ammonium concentrations varied from <2.0 to 46.8 μM in the Imboassica Lagoon. Although solar radiation did reach the bottom of the studied lagoons, there was no colonization of microalgae over the sediment.

Discussion

The present study shows rates of sediment denitrification and water nitrate concentrations up to two orders of magnitude lower than the average estimated for coastal lagoons (Herbert 1999; Piña-Ochoa & Álvarez-Cobelas 2006; Fennel et al. 2009). The absence of a temporal variability over the studied months and between both lagoons was quite unexpected and different from the usually observed in the literature. The metabolism of both lagoons changes during the year (Marotta et al 2010), and these changes apparently did not have any influence on the denitrification rates. The studied lagoons are quite different in terms of geological formation, some limnological characteristics (Table 1), and anthropogenic impacts (more details in Marotta et al 2010). Even with all these differences, denitrification rates were very low and similar in both lagoons.

Previous experiments in these lagoons showed that all measurements performed with 15NO3 addition above 15 μM (final concentration) resulted in constant Dn values (data not shown) and we used 100 μM 15NO3 in our incubations, so one of the assumptions of the IPT method was fulfilled (Nielsen 1992). The same methodology was also used for measuring sediment denitrification rates in several lakes from the Amazon Region. The majority of the measured rates were also low, but in few environments they were one order of magnitude higher (manuscript in preparation). This is a strong indication that the isotope pairing technique method works in the studied lagoons and that the denitrification rates were accurately measured and represent real denitrification rates. Ferguson and Eyre (2007) suggested that the IPT method could underestimate denitrification rates up to 85 %. Even assuming this level of underestimation and correcting the measured rates in our study, the majority of the measurements would still be below 5.0 μmol N2 m−2 h−1, a surprisingly low rate.

The low nitrate concentrations in the water column could be a reasonable explanation for the low denitrification rates reported in this study. Nitrate concentrations were always lower than 2.0 μM at all sampling months, a much lower value than reported for environments with higher denitrification rates (Herbert 1999). The total denitrification rates were low, but we observed an important contribution of coupled nitrification–denitrification in both the oligotrophic and the meso-eutrophic tropical lagoons.

Low or absent denitrification rates were previously reported in other tropical lagoon sediments (Biesboer et al. 1998) and floodplain lake sediments in the Pantanal (Figueiredo Souza et al. 2012) and clearwater Amazonian lakes (Kern et al. 1996; Esteves et al. 2001; Nielsen et al. 2004). Denitrification rates were also absent in periphytic communities associated with Amazonian aquatic macrophytes (Esteves and Enrich-Prast 1998; Enrich-Prast and Esteves 1998) and stream tropical sediments (Solomon et al. 2009).

SOC rates observed in the Cabiúnas Lagoon are comparable to rates of a temperate meso-eutrophic lake (Sweerts et al. 1991), while the Imboassica Lagoon rates were higher than those observed at a temperate eutrophic shallow lagoon (Dedieu et al. 2007). These differences may be mainly attributed to higher temperatures in the tropics (Cardoso et al 2014). The slope of the linear regression between Dn and SOC of the studied tropical environments (<0.001) is much lower than temperate slopes (ca. 0.10: Seitzinger et al. 2006; Fennel et al. 2009 and 0.06: Piehler and Smyth 2011). Not only the slope, but also denitrification rates are much lower than those observed by these temperate studies. Between the tropical environments, the slope of the meso-eutrophic studied lagoon (Imboassica) was one order of magnitude lower than the oligotrophic one (Cabiúnas) (Fig. 3).

Sediment oxygen consumption rates regulate aerobic layer depth in sediments and consequently can regulate denitrification in different ways, directly, by creating anoxic conditions, or indirectly, by controlling the extent of nitrification (Jensen et al. 1994; Nizzoli et al. 2010, Piehler and Smyth 2011).

The intense heterotrophic metabolism can eventually cause extinction in the sediment aerobic layer, limiting nitrification and maintaining very low nitrate concentrations. In tropical environments with low nitrate concentrations, high temperatures, and intense SOC throughout the year, nitrification and coupled nitrification–denitrification can be continuously limited by oxygen limitation.

SOC direct regulation of denitrification occurred in the sediment of the Cabiúnas and Imboassica Lagoons. This system showed lower rates of SOC and this was the most correlated factor with denitrification (data not shown). However, denitrification in sediments containing high amounts of labile organic matter is often limited by the availability of nitrate or nitrite (Fennel et al. 2009). The extremely high SOC of the Imboassica Lagoon seems to indirectly regulate denitrification by shortening the nitrification activity, and nitrate availability was the main and most important regulation factor for denitrification.

Dedieu et al. (2007) observed a negative seasonal correlation between SOC and coupled nitrification–denitrification rates in surface sediments of a temperate eutrophic shallow lagoon. Piehler and Smyth (2011) found a strong correlation between SOC and denitrification rates in a range of temperate environments and habitats and suggested that SOC should be used to predict denitrification in environments with low nitrate availability. Our results somehow corroborate the conclusions from Piehler and Smyth (2011). However, even though we also observed a significant correlation, every system presents its own correlation and a general correlation cannot be applied indiscriminately to predict denitrification.