Abstract
Diversity and Differential Utilization of Amaranthus spp. along the Urban-Rural Continuum of Southern Benin. Increasing recognition of the importance of traditional vegetables as sources of nutrients, health benefits, and income has raised the need to evaluate and document knowledge of these resources in local communities. Indigenous knowledge is crucial for sustainable utilization of these plant resources, though this might be threatened by urbanization and economic development. We carried out a quantitative ethnobotanical survey to assess the relative importance of amaranth in vegetable production systems of southern Benin and identify the main criteria that determine the choice of this crop by farmers. The diversity, uses, and knowledge of amaranths was investigated to assess how the degree of urbanization affects farmers’ knowledge. Our results showed that Amaranthus cruentus is the main cultivated vegetable in the surveyed areas despite its low economic value. Reasons raised by communities were related to the species’ popularity, resistance to nematodes, nutritional value, and short cultivation cycle. Wild amaranths include A. dubius, A. blitum, A. spinosus, and A. viridis. Amaranths were mainly used as vegetables and for their nutraceutical properties. Urbanization was found to negatively affect the knowledge and uses of wild species, whereas the knowledge and utilization of cultivated species was quite homogenous along the urban-rural continuum. We discuss strategies to increase knowledge of wild resources in urban settings and therefore reduce loss of genetic resources.
Resume
Diversité et utilisation des amarantes ( Amaranthus spp.) le long du continuum urbain-rural au Sud-Bénin. La reconnaissance croissante de la valeur nutritionnelle des légumes locaux, leurs bienfaits pour la santé et leur contribution au revenu des populations a révélé la nécessité d’évaluer et de documenter les connaissances associées à ces espèces au sein des communautés locales. En effet, les connaissances endogènes considérées comme importantes pour la conservation et l’utilisation des ressources phytogénétiques pourraient être en voie de disparition du fait de l’urbanisation et du développement économique. La présente étude a porté sur une enquête ethnobotanique réalisée le long du continuum urbain-rural au Sud-Bénin afin d’évaluer l’importance relative des amarantes et d’identifier les principaux critères qui déterminent le choix de cette culture par les agriculteurs. En outre, la diversité, les usages et les connaissances des amarantes ont été étudiés afin d’évaluer comment le degré d’urbanisation affecte les connaissances des agriculteurs. Nos résultats ont montré que Amaranthus cruentus est la principale espèce cultivée dans les zones étudiées en dépit de sa faible valeur économique. Les raisons évoquées par les producteurs étaient liées à la popularité de l’espèce, sa résistance aux nématodes, sa valeur nutritionnelle et son cycle de culture court. Les amarantes sauvages : A. dubius, A. blitum, A. spinosus et A. viridis étaient principalement utilisées pour leurs propriétés nutraceutiques. Le niveau d’urbanisation affecte la connaissance et l’utilisation des espèces sauvages tandis que la connaissance et l’utilisation des espèces cultivées sont assez homogènes le long du continuum urbain-rural. Des stratégies devant permettre de mieux conserver les connaissances en milieu urbain et de réduire l’érosion des ressources phytogénétiques ont également été proposées.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Erosion of agro-biodiversity as well as nutritional and dietary diversity is partially caused by human activities associated with changes in land use (Robertson and Swinton 2005; Young et al. 2005) and the development of a dual urban food supply system, with a formal and informal sector servicing different sections of urban society (Ambrose-Oji 2009). Modern agriculture is one of the greatest threats to biodiversity, but it also holds some of the keys to its sustainable conservation (Sileshi et al. 2008). Erosion of agro-biodiversity is associated with loss of related knowledge, and for a number of authors, declining indigenous knowledge is a consequence of modernization and acculturation (Brandt et al. 2013; Gandolfo and Hanazaki 2014; Reyes-García et al. 2007; Voeks and Leony 2004). Others working in Mexico (Zarger and Stepp 2004), Panama (Müller-Schwarze 2006), and Bolivia and Peru (Mathez-Stiefel et al. 2012) report that indigenous knowledge of plant resources is resilient to the forces of modernization and economic development (Furusawa 2009; Vandebroek and Balick 2012; Zarger and Stepp 2004). These differences in opinions might be due to the diversity of sociocultural and environmental contexts of the surveyed communities, especially in terms of transmission of knowledge through generations (Cherry 2014; Dovie et al. 2008; Mathez-Stiefel et al. 2012), urban and agricultural development policies (Boillat et al. 2013; Eyssartier et al. 2011; Gomez-Baggethun et al. 2010), and ecological conditions (Ladio and Lozada 2004). In West Africa, where urban areas are growing very rapidly and where local knowledge is not well documented, it is important to understand how urban development is affecting people-plant relationships.
There is a wide diversity of indigenous vegetables in West Africa that are significant sources of vitamins, antioxidants, minerals, and proteins (Odhav et al. 2007). Quite a large number of these species are known to have health protecting properties and uses (Smith and Eyzaguirre 2007). They are important candidates for intensive agriculture and to ensure substantial returns for poor farmers (Ndenga et al. 2013). In Benin, indigenous vegetables occur as cultivated crops or weedy and wild plants. They play a significant role in the daily food and nutritional requirements of local people, not only in rural areas but also increasingly in urban areas (Adéoti et al. 2009). Along with Solanum macrocarpum L., amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus L.) has been reported as the most cultivated traditional vegetable in the country (Grubben 1975; Pasquini et al. 2009).
Many studies have mentioned amaranths as important leafy vegetables valued in other parts of Africa (Achigan-Dako et al. 2014; Faber et al. 2010; Gueye and Diouf 2008; Vorster and Van Rensburg 2005). Amaranths exhibit C4 photosynthesis and grow rapidly under heat and drought stress, and they tolerate a variety of unfavorable abiotic conditions, including high salinity, acidity, or alkalinity, making them well suited to subsistence agriculture. These characteristics confer to amaranths a potential for significant beneficial impacts on the problem of malnutrition (Achigan-Dako et al. 2014; Maughan et al. 2011). They are rich sources of proteins (Rastogi and Shukla 2013), vitamin A, vitamin C, and minerals including iron, zinc, phosphorus, calcium (Schönfeldt and Pretorius 2011), magnesium, and manganese (Odhav et al. 2007).
Apart from A. cruentus, six other species belonging to the genus Amaranthus have been recorded in Benin: Amaranthus tricolor L. which has been recently introduced in the country as a vegetable and ornamental (Adjakidjè 2006), and Amaranthus blitum L., Amaranthus dubius Mart ex Thell., Amaranthus graecizans L., Amaranthus spinosus L., and Amaranthus viridis L., which are considered wild species but are harvested for consumption and other purposes (N’Danikou et al. 2010; Sogbohossou and Achigan-Dako 2014). Wild amaranths represent an invaluable gene pool for improving related cultivated species.
In this study we examine the variation in local knowledge related to the diversity and management of wild and cultivated amaranths among farmers in urban, peri-urban, and rural areas of Southern Benin. We assess the relationships between local communities and both wild and cultivated amaranths and identify attributes that might offer livelihood improvement opportunities and provide insights into the sustainable utilization of these resources. We hypothesize that the diversity and utilization of amaranths changes along the urban-rural continuum, and this variation depends on the status of the species.
Materials and Methods
Study Area
The study was carried out in Southern Benin in four municipalities: Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Sèmè-Kpodji, and Sô-ava. The four municipalities belong to the Guinean zone where the rainfall is bimodal. The mean annual rainfall ranges from 900 to 1,200 mm, and the mean temperature is 27°C. In Sèmè-Kpodji and Cotonou, soils are sandy and poor in organic matter but suitable for vegetable production because of the high groundwater which facilitates irrigation. In Abomey-Calavi, vegetable growers are settled around inland valleys on ferralitic or hydromorphic soils. Sô-ava is a lakeside rural municipality, and farming is practiced in exposed areas where the soil is hydromorphic. Details about the demography of each municipality are provided in Table 1.
Information collecting sites were categorized as urban, peri-urban, or rural areas based on the level of urbanization. Urban areas included the municipalities of Cotonou (allotments of Cadjèhoun and Houeyiho) and Sèmè-Kpodji (allotment of VIMAS). Peri-urban areas included the municipality of Abomey-Calavi (vegetable gardens of Togba, Ouèdo, and Hêvié), whereas rural areas included the municipality of Sô-ava (village of Ahomey-Lokpo).
Data Collection
Assessing the Importance of Amaranth Species in Urban and Peri-urban Vegetable Production Systems
A total of five focus-group discussions, including two in Sèmè-Kpodji, two in Cotonou, and one in Abomey-Calavi, were conducted with 10 to 15 farmers in each group. They classified cultivated vegetables based on pair-wise comparisons, and determined the value criteria according to the method used by N’Danikou et al. (2011). Participants were asked to rank the criteria from the most important to the least. From these, the top five were selected. During individual interviews, informants from urban and peri-urban areas were asked to score cultivated species from 1 (lowest) to 4 (highest) based on the top five elicited criteria. The objectives of the survey were clearly explained to farmers in each locality. Verbal consent was obtained from those willing to participate in the survey and those who agreed to allow the information they provided to be published.
Local Knowledge Related to Amaranth Species
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 40 farmers per municipality. In the first section, they were asked to list and describe useful amaranth species. Photographs were then shown to them and they were asked to identify the species. This method was used because of the similarities among amaranth species and the use of one vernacular name to refer to many species, and vice versa (Achigan-Dako et al. 2010). This allowed us to make an accurate identification of the species they had listed. The questionnaire was used to elicit information about species uses, status, cultivation systems, and consumption practices. The second section of the questionnaire dealt with informants’ age, gender, ethnic group, and education (Table 2).
Data Analysis
Spearman’s rank-order correlation (rho) was calculated to analyze the similarity between the results of the scoring and that of the pair-wise ranking. Spearman’s non-parametric correlation coefficient was used to examine correlations between value criteria.
For ethnobotanical analysis of knowledge related to amaranth species, the following indices were used: the use value (UV), the fidelity level of uses (FL), the use diversity (UD), the informant diversity value (ID), and the informant equitability value (IE). Details of each index are provided in Table 3. The normality and homogeneity of the ID and IE indices were checked. The non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a pairwise Wilcoxon test were carried out to assess differences related to surveyed areas, gender, and age for UV, ID, and IE. Multiple proportions test using the function prop.test was performed to assess differences in frequencies of citation of the species. Generalized linear models using Poisson distribution and stepwise selection were used to model the use value as a function of species, areas, categories of age, and gender. All analyses were performed using R version 3.0.2. (R Core Team 2013).
Results
Importance of Amaranth in Vegetable Production Systems
Five main criteria were used by farmers to determine the value of vegetables: (1) the availability of markets; (2) the profitability of production; (3) the requirement of labor and inputs; (4) resistance to nematodes; and (5) the nutritive value. According to the scoring, the top five species cultivated in the urban and peri-urban gardens of Cotonou were: amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus L.), African eggplant (Solanum macrocarpum L.), tree basil (Ocimum gratissimum L.), lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), and carrot (Daucus carota L.). These species were widely cultivated either because of the availability of the markets and their resistance to nematodes (amaranth and tree basil) or because of their profitability (African eggplant, lettuce, and carrot). They were followed by bitter leaf (Vernonia amygdalina Del.; syn. Gymnanthemum amygdalinum [Delile] Sch.Bip. ex Walp.), cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.), cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.), onions (Allium spp.), and chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.).
Positive and strong correlations were found between the ranks of the top ten species derived from the scoring and pair-wise ranking in Abomey-Calavi (rho = 0.95, p <0.01), Cotonou (rho = 0.91, p <0.01), and Sèmè-Kpodji (rho = 0.95, p <0.01), which suggests that both methods were valid. The Spearman’s correlation among the value criteria (Table 4) showed that there were significant positive correlations between profitability and availability of markets (rho = 0.28, p <0.01), labor and input needs and resistance to nematodes (rho = 0.38, p <0.01), labor and input needs and nutritional value (rho = 0.33, p <0.01), and between resistance to nematodes and nutritional value (rho = 0.35, p <0.01). No significant correlation was found between profitability and labor and input needs.
Use and Management of Amaranth Species
Inventory of the Species
Five species were recorded throughout the four municipalities: A. blitum, A. cruentus, A. dubius, A. spinosus, and A. viridis. In all localities, two cultivars of A. cruentus were distinguished by informants—a green cultivar and a red cultivar. These two cultivars were thus considered separately for the purposes of this study. The number of species cited by each informant (Fig. 1) was significantly different among areas (p <0.01). No differences were found between peri-urban and rural areas (p = 0.83); however, there was a significant difference between urban and peri-urban on the one hand, and urban and rural areas on the other hand (p <0.01).
The most mentioned species were the green cruentus, the red cruentus, and A. dubius, followed by A. blitum, A. spinosus, and A. viridis (Fig. 2). Green cruentus was cited by all informants in the three areas. No significant differences were found between areas for red cruentus, A. blitum, and A. spinosus. A. dubius was cited more in rural areas than urban and peri-urban areas (p = 0.046). Amaranthus viridis was mentioned only in peri-urban areas. Leaf color, shape, and size, inflorescence color, presence of spines, and the relative plant height at maturity were the main criteria used to describe the species.
Species Status
In the three areas, green cruentus and red cruentus were considered cultivated species by all the informants who mentioned them. All informants who mentioned green cruentus cultivate it. About 25% of the informants who mentioned red cruentus cultivate it, and among them 80% were in rural areas, 12% in urban, and 8% in peri-urban areas. None of the informants who mentioned A. dubius cultivate it. However, 20% reported that it was cultivated for home consumption in some areas of the country, and 80% reported that it was harvested in the wild. Amaranthus blitum, A. spinosus, and A. viridis were considered wild species by all informants who cited them.
Diversity of Knowledge among Informants
The comparison of informants in terms of diversity value (ID) and equitability value (IE) (Table 5) revealed significant differences for green cruentus (p <0.01). Knowledge related to green cruentus was more diversified and homogeneously distributed among informants in rural areas than peri-urban and urban areas. The equitability value of A. dubius was also higher in rural areas than urban and peri-urban areas, showing that knowledge related to this species was well distributed in these rural areas. No differences were found for the other species. Also, the ID and IE values were low, indicating that knowledge about these species was less diversified and held by a low proportion of informants.
Species Uses
For all species, the parts used are the leaves and young stems, which are harvested together. Uses were grouped in three categories: food, fodder, and nutraceutical properties. We define nutraceutical as any food or part of a food that provides medical or health benefits, including the prevention and treatment of disease (DeFelice 1992). The use values of the species differed significantly among areas (Fig. 3) except for red cruentus. Differences were noticeable between urban and rural areas for green cruentus (p = 0.038), A. dubius (p = 0.0004), A. blitum (p = 0.009), and A. spinosus (p = 0.003). Between urban and peri-urban areas, differences of use values were observed for A. blitum (p = 0.005), A. spinosus (p = 0.030), and A. viridis (p = 0.028). Finally, between peri-urban and rural areas, there were significant differences for use values of A. dubius (p = 0.002). Fig. 4 shows the contribution of each use category to the species use value. Overall, the nutraceutical uses were the most diversified for all species except A. viridis, which was only mentioned as a vegetable by three informants in peri-urban areas. Detailed uses of each species are summarized in Table 6. Overall, nine uses were mentioned for green cruentus and A. dubius, eight for red cruentus, five for A. blitum and A. spinosus, and only one for A. viridis. More uses were reported in rural areas than in others for red cruentus, A. dubius, A. blitum, and A. spinosus; the green cruentus was more diversely used in urban area (eight uses) than in other areas (respectively six uses). Use as a vegetable was the most popular for all species in the three areas. For nutraceutical properties, green cruentus and A. dubius were considered as excellent tonic and used to fight against fatigue. The use of red cruentus to prevent or cure anemia was popular in the three areas. In urban and rural areas, A. blitum is mainly used to prevent and treat weak bones, and A. spinosus is efficient in treating skin disorders. A. cruentus and A. spinosus were mentioned as fodder for pigs. Other uses mentioned by a few informants included treatment of constipation, anemia, hypertension, ulcers, weak bones, brain and liver disorders for A. cruentus, treatment of malaria, diarrhea, weak bones, anemia, liver and brain disorders for A. dubius, the use of A. blitum against fatigue and liver disorders, and the use of A. spinosus as a febrifuge and anti-inflammatory, especially for angina.
Factors Affecting Use Values
The analysis of the variation of the use value according to age, area, and species (Table 7) showed that the age of informants had no significant effect on the use value. The use value varied significantly according to the species, the area, and their interaction. Green and red cruentus had a higher use value than wild species. The use value of both cultivars and A. dubius varied significantly according to area, while no significant variation was found for other species.
Discussion
Importance of Amaranthus cruentus in Vegetable Production Systems of Urban and Peri-urban Cotonou
The use of quantitative ethnobotany to rank cultivated vegetables in urban and peri-urban areas revealed that amaranth is the first vegetable cultivated in terms of production area, which corroborates the results of Pasquini et al. (2009). According to farmers, the choice of one species rather than another is highly dependent on the availability of sales market, profitability, labor and inputs, resistance to nematodes, and the nutritional value of the species. Despite its low profitability, amaranth is widely cultivated because of its short cycle and resistance to nematodes, which makes it a choice crop, often combined with long cycle vegetables such as African eggplant, cabbages, and lettuce.
The use of this species in combination with others in the same plots also allow farmers to save inputs such as water, fertilizers, and pesticides and provides shade to seedlings of other crops. Amaranthus cruentus is often included in crop rotations to reduce the prevalence of nematodes on susceptible species such as African eggplant and carrot, among others species. Wilson and Caveness (1980) found that Amaranthus sp. significantly reduced populations of spiral nematode (Helicotylenchus pseudorobustus). The resistance of Amaranthus cruentus to root knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) was also reported (Afouda et al. 2012, 2008; Desaeger and Rao 1999; Ferris et al. 1993). According to respondents in urban and peri-urban areas, the use of A. cruentus in crop rotation systems has a soil sanitation effect and provides a cleaner environment for the next crop. This result highlights the potential of amaranth species to reduce the harm of nematodes in vegetable production systems.
Correlation tests were performed between the criteria used to elicit the place of amaranths in urban and peri-urban production systems. The correlation value was negative between the profitability and the resistance to nematodes, indicating that nematodes-resistant vegetables such as amaranths have a low profitability.
We observed no correlation between the “profitability” and the ‘”labor and inputs” criteria. This result was unexpected but could be explained on the one hand by the fact that labor in vegetable production systems mostly comes from the farmer’s household and is not counted as an important input. On the other hand, the profitability/labor and input relationship greatly varied among vegetable species. Some vegetables like cabbage require considerable labor with decreasing profitability. Others like parsley (Petroselinum crispum [Mill.] Fuss) and mint (Mentha spp.) were cultivated on very small plots without intense labor but can be highly profitable. To clarify the profitability/labor and input relationship, we suggest a full economic analysis over several seasons including major and minor vegetable species.
The results of scoring and ranking of the species were highly correlated. The same findings were reported by N’Danikou et al. (2011), who recommended the scoring method to assess local value of edible wild plants and prioritize them for conservation actions. Given the dynamics of production in vegetable gardens, these methods might be regularly used as a rapid ethnobotanical appraisal tool to assess knowledge and trends in the urban and peri-urban vegetable production systems.
Local Uses of Amaranth Species
Of the seven amaranth species recorded in Benin (Adjakidjè 2006), five were mentioned as being used in Southern Benin. They are used as vegetable, fodder for pigs, and for their nutraceutical properties. Amaranthus cruentus, the only species cultivated in this study, has two cultivars: the green cruentus with green leaves, stem, and inflorescences, and the red cruentus, which has amaranthine pigmented leaves, inflorescences, and stems. The first cultivar, the most often cultivated, is considered by farmers as a tonic and stimulant and is rich in vitamins and minerals (Fasuyi 2007; Schönfeldt and Pretorius 2011). Both cultivars are recommended for children and pregnant or lactating mothers to prevent or cure anemia. This therapeutic use has been confirmed by other studies (Koffi et al. 2012; Lyimo et al. 2003; Peter et al. 2014). However, the red cruentus was considered a more popular source of iron among informants. Hels et al. (2004) found that red leaf cultivars of amaranth (A. gangeticus) had a higher content of iron, calcium, zinc, and β-carotene than green cultivars. According to Yadav and Sehgal (2002), blanching and cooking amaranth leaves increases availability of iron. Amaranthus cruentus is also used to treat constipation, hypertension, liver and brain disorders. Grubben (2004a) reported the same uses for the species in various parts of Africa.
Amaranthus dubius was considered by a large proportion of informants as a wild species, while some reported its cultivation, especially in rural areas of the Valley of Ouémé where leafy vegetables are widely cultivated. According to Ambrose-Oji (2009), the distinction between wild and cultivated is not clear since there are complex relationships between urban and peri-urban vegetable production and the harvesting of wild species.
Amaranthus dubius was the most popular among non-cultivated amaranths in the surveyed areas and is a promising species for introduction into cultivation systems in southern Benin. Its large-scale cultivation has been reported in Kenya and it is widely used in East Africa (Maundu et al. 2009). Moreover, Sogbohossou and Achigan-Dako (2014) revealed that this species has interesting leaf yield in southern Benin conditions and could be easily cultivated. The species is used by informants to combat fatigue, anemia, malaria, hypertension, diarrhea, weak bones, and brain disorders. In Ethiopia, the use of the species has been reported against skeleton-muscular diseases (Giday et al. 2010). Analysis of variation of nutrient content among Amaranthus species showed that A. dubius had a high protein content (Andini et al. 2013), vitamin C, calcium, and zinc (Yang and Keding 2009). Research on the reported pharmacological properties of the species is scanty.
Amaranthus blitum, A. spinosus, and A. viridis are not cultivated. They are either harvested in the wild when needed or spared by farmers during weeding. Their use as vegetables and to a lesser extent as nutraceuticals has been reported by farmers. A. blitum is considered a remedy against liver disorders, weak bones, and fatigue. Neuwinger (2000) reported its use to treat warts, blennorrhagia, angina, fracture, nervousness, swellings, and tumors. There is still a lack of scientific information about these properties. A. spinosus is used by informants to treat skin disorders, angina, and fever. Antipyretic (Kumar et al. 2011) and anti-inflammatory (Olajide et al. 2004; Zeashan et al. 2009a) properties of the species have been demonstrated. It has also shown diuretic (Amuthan et al. 2012), anthelmintic (Kumar et al. 2010), hepatoprotective (Zeashan et al. 2009b), and anti-malarial activities (Hilou et al. 2006). A. viridis was only mentioned as a vegetable. However, Grubben and Denton (2004) reported its use as diuretic, purgative, and anti-inflammatory. Antidiabetic and anti-hyperlipidemic potential of the species has also been highlighted (Kumar et al. 2012; Pandhare et al. 2012). The leaves of A. viridis are particularly rich in proteins, vitamin A, and iron (Yang and Keding 2009). Overall, amaranth species have interesting nutraceutical properties and are used to treat various diseases.
Knowledge Dynamics along the Urban-Rural Continuum
The comparison of use values in urban, peri-urban, and rural areas revealed significant differences. These differences were particularly pronounced between urban and rural areas, with peri-urban areas often intermediate between the two. The variation of use value along the continuum was higher for wild species, while very few differences were noticed for both cultivars of A. cruentus. In urban and peri-urban areas, there is a greater diversity of exotic vegetables than in rural areas (pers. obs.). This trend was also observed in Tanzania, where demand for exotic vegetables increased with urbanization (Yang and Keding 2009).
Cocks (2006) reported the use of wild plants by most of the urban households surveyed in South Africa. However, the bulk of these species were used for their cultural significance and only wild fruits were harvested for consumption. This underscores the lack of interest for wild vegetables in urban areas and corroborates our findings.
Overall, for the green cruentus that is commonly cultivated, more uses were cited in urban areas than other areas. No significant differences occurred among areas in terms of distribution and diversity of knowledge related to other species. This trend might be explained by the importance of this cultivar in urban vegetable production systems. Indeed, people adjust to economic and practical realities through selective maintenance of useful plant knowledge (Müller-Schwarze 2006). Comparison of species knowledge showed that it was more homogenously distributed and diversified for cultivated species compared with wild species. The low popularity of wild species compared with cultivated amaranth is associated with great variations of levels of knowledge which is held by a small part of the farmers. This distribution of knowledge is because wild amaranths are considered useless weeds by most urban growers. The low use value and fidelity level of uses of wild amaranths suggest that the traditional knowledge of these species is at risk of erosion, as also reported by Srithi et al. (2009) in northern Thailand for medicinal plants. Nevertheless, although wild amaranths were not among the preferred species used as vegetables, their health benefits should be considered as additional advantages to promote their consumption. Maintenance of knowledge for wild leafy vegetables identification and preparation will be necessary for their continued use (Powell et al. 2014). The persistence of knowledge related to wild amaranths, although held by a small portion of farmers, can be used as a starting point for promoting these species.
The variation of the use value of the species was not significantly associated with age and gender, showing that the distribution of knowledge among farmers is independent of both factors. Some studies (Gandolfo and Hanazaki 2014; Mathez-Stiefel et al. 2012; Müller-Schwarze 2006) have demonstrated that traditional knowledge was not systematically declining among younger people, but rather was shaped by changing sociocultural and economic contexts. Likewise, even though the connection between local knowledge and gender has been demonstrated elsewhere (Dovie et al. 2008; Souto and Ticktin 2012; Voeks 2007), our results showed that amaranths are similarly used by men and women, pointing out the importance of these indigenous vegetables for local communities.
Implications for Research and Development
Amaranthus cruentus is a vegetable of considerable importance in southern Benin. Despite its low economic value, this species plays multiple roles in production systems and provides various nutritional and health benefits for consumers. However, more investigations are needed to clarify the nematode-suppressing ability of the species in crop rotation. It might also be useful to explore the possibility of developing botanical extracts from amaranth species that can be used in the integrated management of nematodes in horticultural production systems.
The knowledge associated with wild related species such as A. dubius, A. blitum, A. spinosus, and A. viridis is diversely distributed among farmers in both rural and urban areas. In urban and peri-urban areas where amaranth is the most cultivated vegetable, knowledge related to wild species are less known and used by farmers even though the plants exhibit rapid growth, are well adapted to environmental constraints, and can substantially contribute to healthy diets and mitigation of hidden hunger. There are currently limited reports about the cultivation status and growth ability of wild amaranth species in Benin (e.g., Achigan-Dako et al. 2010; Sogbohossou and Achigan-Dako 2014). In order to integrate wild amaranths in vegetable production systems, it is important to check the validity of nutraceutical properties attributed to them and to raise awareness of consumers about their benefits. These actions might increase the economic value of amaranth and provide incentives for conservation, cultivation and sustainable utilization of its wild relatives along the urban-rural continuum. Emphasis should be put on A. dubius which is already cultivated in other areas and exhibits interesting leaf production potential (Grubben 2004b).
Literature Cited
Achigan-Dako, E. G., M. W. Pasquini, K. F. Assogba, S. N’Danikou, H. Yedomonhan, A. Dansi, and B. Ambrose-Oji, eds. 2010. Traditional vegetables in Benin. Institut National des Recherches Agricoles du Bénin, Imprimeries du CENAP, Cotonou.
———, O. E. D. Sogbohossou, and P. Maundu. 2014. Current knowledge on Amaranthus spp.: Research avenues for improved nutritional value and yield in leafy amaranths in sub-Saharan Africa. Euphytica 197:303–317.
Adéoti, K., A. Dansi, L. Ahoton, B. Kpèki, B. Ahohuendo, A. Ahanchédé, R. Vodouhè, J. Hounhouigan, and A. Sanni. 2009. Selection of sites for the in situ conservation of four traditional leafy vegetables consumed in Benin. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences 3:1357–1374.
Adjakidjè, V. 2006. Amaranthaceae. in A. Akoègninou, W. Van Der Burg, L. Van der Maesen, V. Adjakidjè, J. Essou, B. Sinsin, and H. Yédomonhan, eds., Flore analytique du Bénin. Blackhuys Publishers, Cotonou.
Afouda, L., H. Baimey, and H. Fanou. 2008. Evaluation of Amaranthus sp. and Vernonia amygdalina, and soil amendments with poultry manure for the management of root-knot nematodes on eggplant. Phytoparasitica 36:368–376.
———, ———, F. Bachabi, D. Sero-Kpera, and R. Balogoun. 2012. Effet de l’hyptis (Hyptis suaveolens), du neem (Azadirachta indica), du vernonia (Vernonia amygdalina), et de l’amarante (Amaranthus sp.) sur les nematodes à Galles (Meloidogyne spp.) en cultures maraicheres. Agronomie Africaine 24:209–218.
Ambrose-Oji, B. 2009. Urban food systems and African indigenous vegetables: Defining the spaces and places for African indigenous vegetables in urban and peri-urban agriculture. Pages 1–33 in C. M. Shackleton, M. W. Pasquini, and A. W. Drescher, eds., African indigenous vegetables in urban agriculture. Earthscan, London.
Amuthan, A., B. Chogtu, K. L. Bairy, and P. M. Sudhakar. 2012. Evaluation of diuretic activity of Amaranthus spinosus Linn. aqueous extract in Wistar rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 140:422–427.
Andini, R., S. Yoshida, and R. Ohsawa. 2013. Variation in protein content and amino acids in the leaves of grain, vegetable and weedy types of Amaranths. Agronomy 3:391–403.
Boillat, S., S.-L. Mathez-Stiefel, and S. Rist. 2013. Linking local knowledge, conservation practices and ecosystem diversity: Comparing two communities in the Tunari National Park (Bolivia). Ethnobiology and Conservation 2:8.
Brandt, R., S.-L. Mathez-Stiefel, S. Lachmuth, I. Hensen, and S. Rist. 2013. Knowledge and valuation of Andean agroforestry species: The role of sex, age, and migration among members of a rural community in Bolivia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 9:83.
Byg, A. and H. Balslev. 2001. Diversity and use of palms in Zahamena, eastern Madagascar. Biodiversity and Conservation 10:951–970.
Cherry, C. 2014. Variation and transmission of Sonoran wild food knowledge in Southern Arizona. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 53:1–23.
Cocks, M. L. 2006. Page 197 Wild plant resources and cultural practices in rural and urban households in South Africa: Implications for bio-cultural diversity conservation. Wageningen University, Netherlands.
Core Team, R. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
Dadjo, C., A. E. Assogbadjo, B. Fandohan, R. Glèlè Kakaï, S. Chakeredza, T. D. Houehanou, P. V. Damme, and B. Sinsin. 2012. Uses and management of black plum (Vitex doniana Sweet) in Southern Benin. Fruits 67:239–248.
DeFelice, S. L. 1992. The nutraceutical initiative: A recommendation for U.S. economic and regulatory reforms. Genetic Engineering News 12:13–15.
Denton, O. A. 2004. Plant resources of tropical Africa, 2: Vegetables. Backhuys Publishers, Netherlands/CTA, Wageningen.
Desaeger, J. and M. Rao. 1999. The root-knot nematode problem in sesbania fallows and scope for managing it in western Kenya. Agroforestry Systems 47:273–288.
Dovie, D. B., E. Witkowski, and C. M. Shackleton. 2008. Knowledge of plant resource use based on location, gender and generation. Applied Geography 28:311–322.
Eyssartier, C., A. H. Ladio, and M. Lozada. 2011. Traditional horticultural knowledge change in a rural population of the Patagonian steppe. Journal of Arid Environments 75:78–86.
Faber, M., P. Van Jaarsveld, F. Wenhold, and J. van Rensburg. 2010. African leafy vegetables consumed by households in the Limpopo and KwaZulu-Natal provinces in South Africa. South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition 23:30–38.
Fasuyi, A. O. 2007. Bio-nutritional evaluations of three tropical leaf vegetables (Telfairia occidentalis, Amaranthus cruentus and Talinum triangulare) as sole dietary protein sources in rat assay. Food Chemistry 103:757–765.
Ferris, H., H. Carlson, D. Viglierchio, B. Westerdahl, F. Wu, C. Anderson, A. Juurma, and D. Kirby. 1993. Host status of selected crops to Meloidogyne chitwoodi. Journal of Nematology 25(4S):849–857.
Furusawa, T. 2009. Changing ethnobotanical knowledge of the Roviana people, Solomon Islands: Quantitative approaches to its correlation with modernization. Human Ecology 37:147–159.
Gandolfo, E. S. and N. Hanazaki. 2014. Distribution of local plant knowledge in a recently urbanized area (Campeche District, Florianópolis, Brazil). Urban Ecosystems 17:775–785.
Giday, M., Z. Asfaw, and Z. Woldu. 2010. Ethnomedicinal study of plants used by Sheko ethnic group of Ethiopia. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 132:75–85.
Gomez-Baggethun, E., S. Mingorria, V. Reyes-Garcia, L. Calvet, and C. Montes. 2010. Traditional ecological knowledge trends in the transition to a market economy: Empirical study in the Donana natural areas. Conservation Biology 24(3):721–729.
Grubben, G. J. H. 1975. La culture de l’amarante, légume-feuilles tropical: Avec référence spéciale au sud-Dahomey. Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool, Wageningen.
——— 2004a. Amaranthus cruentus L. Pages 67–72 in G. J. H. Grubben and O. A. Denton, eds., Plant resources of tropical Africa, 2: Vegetables. Backhuys Publishers, Netherlands/CTA, Wageningen.
——— 2004b. Amaranthus dubius Mart. ex Thell. Pages 72–76 in G. J. H. Gdrubben and O. A. Denton, eds., Plant resources of tropical Africa, 2: Vegetables. Backhuys Publishers, Netherlands/CTA, Wageningen.
Gueye, M. and M. Diouf. 2008. Traditional leafy vegetables in Senegal: Diversity and medicinal uses. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines 4:469–475.
Hels, O., T. Larsen, L. P. Christensen, U. Kidmose, N. Hassan, and S. H. Thilsted. 2004. Contents of iron, calcium, zinc and β-carotene in commonly consumed vegetables in Bangladesh. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 17:587–595.
Hilou, A., O. Nacoulma, and T. Guiguemde. 2006. In vivo antimalarial activities of extracts from Amaranthus spinosus L. and Boerhavia erecta L. in mice. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 103:236–240.
Hoffman, B. and T. Gallaher. 2008. Relative cultural importance indices in quantitative ethnobotany. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 5:201–218.
INSAE. 2004a. Cahiers des villages et quartiers de ville: Département de l’Atlantique. Cotonou, Bénin: Direction des Etudes Démographiques, Institut National de Statistique Appliquée et d’Economie (INSAE).
——— 2004b. Cahiers des villages et quartiers de ville: Département de l’Ouémé. Cotonou, Bénin: Direction des Etudes Démographiques, Institut National de Statistique Appliquée et d’Economie (INSAE).
——— 2004c. Cahiers des villages et quartiers de ville: Département du Littoral. Cotonou, Bénin: Direction des Etudes Démographiques, Institut National de Statistique Appliquée et d’Economie (INSAE).
Koffi, A. G., E. L. Bomisso, and F. H. T. Bi. 2012. Ethnomedical study and iron content of some medicinal herbs used in traditional medicine in Cote d’Ivoire for the treatment of anaemia. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines 9:81–89.
Kumar, A. B. S., K. Lakshman, K. N. Jayaveera, R. Nandeesh, B. Manoj, and D. Ranganayakulu. 2010. Comparative in vitro antihelmintic activity of three plants from the Amaranthaceae family. Archives of Biological Sciences 62:185–189.
Kumar, B. S. A., K. Lakshman, and K. N. Jayaveera. 2011. Comparative antipyretic activity of ethanolic extracts of some species of Amaranthus. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine: S47–S50.
Kumar, A., K. Lakshman, K. Jayaveea, D. Sheshadri Shekar, S. Khan, B. Thippeswamy, and V. P. Veerapur. 2012. Antidiabetic, antihyperlipidemic and antioxidant activities of methanolic extract of Amaranthus viridis Linn in alloxan induced diabetic rats. Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology 64:75–79.
Ladio, A. H. and M. Lozada. 2004. Patterns of use and knowledge of wild edible plants in distinct ecological environments: A case study of a Mapuche community from northwestern Patagonia. Biodiversity and Conservation 13:1153–1173.
Lyimo, M., R. Temu, and J. Mugula. 2003. Identification and nutrient composition of indigenous vegetables of Tanzania. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 58:85–92.
Mathez-Stiefel, S.-L., R. Brandt, S. Lachmuth, and S. Rist. 2012. Are the young less knowledgeable? Local knowledge of natural remedies and its transformations in the Andean highlands. Human Ecology 40:909–930.
Maughan, P., S. Smith, D. Fairbanks, and E. Jellen. 2011. Development, characterization, and linkage mapping of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the grain amaranths (Amaranthus sp.). The Plant Genome 4:92–101.
Maundu, P., E. G. Achigan-Dako, and Y. Morimoto. 2009. Biodiversity of African vegetables. Pages 65–104 in C. M. Shackleton, M. W. Pasquini, and A. W. Drescher, eds., African indigenous vegetables in urban agriculture. Earthscan, London.
Müller-Schwarze, N. K. 2006. Antes and Hoy Día: Plant knowledge and categorization as adaptations to life in Panama in the twenty-first century. Economic Botany 60:321–334.
N’Danikou, S., T. M. Assogba, and E. S. Avohou. 2010. Selected species of traditional vegetable of Benin by family. Pages 93–197 in E. G. Achigan-Dako, M. W. Pasquini, F. Assogba Komlan, S. N’Danikou, A. Dansi, and B. Ambrose-Oji, eds., Traditional vegetables in Benin. Institut National des Recherches Agricoles du Bénin. Imprimeries du CENAP, Cotonou.
———, E. G. Achigan-Dako, and J. L. Wong. 2011. Eliciting local values of wild edible plants in southern Benin to identify priority species for conservation. Economic Botany 65:381–395.
Ndenga, E., E. Achigan-Dako, G. Mbugua, D. Maye, and W. Ojanji. 2013. Agricultural diversification with indigenous vegetables for cash cropping and nutrition: Examples from Rift Valley and Central Provinces in Kenya. II International Symposium on Underutilized Plant Species: Crops for the Future–Beyond. Food Security 979:549–558.
Neuwinger, H. D. 2000. African traditional medicine: A dictionary of plant use and applications with supplement: Search system for diseases. Medpharm Scientific Publishers, Stuttgart.
Odhav, B., S. Beekrum, U. Akula, and H. Baijnath. 2007. Preliminary assessment of nutritional value of traditional leafy vegetables in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 20:430–435.
Olajide, O. A., B. R. Ogunleye, and T. O. Erinle. 2004. Anti-inflammatory properties of Amaranthus spinosus leaf extract. Pharmaceutical Biology 42:521–525.
Pandhare, R., S. Balakrishnan, P. Mohite, and S. Khanage. 2012. Antidiabetic and antihyperlipidaemic potential of Amaranthus viridis (L.) Merr. in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease 2:S180–S185.
Pasquini, M., F. Assogba-Komlan, H. Vorster, C. Shackleton, and M. Abukuysa-Onyango. 2009. Pages 177–224 The production of African indigenous vegetables in urban and peri-urban agriculture: A comparative analysis of case studies from Benin, Kenya and South Africa. African indigenous vegetables in urban and peri-urban agriculture.
Peter, E., S. F. Rumisha, K. O. Mashoto, and H. M. Malebo. 2014. Ethno-medicinal knowledge and plants traditionally used to treat anemia in Tanzania: A cross sectional survey. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 154:767–773.
Powell, B., A. Ouarghidi, T. Johns, M. Ibn Tattou, and P. Eyzaguirre. 2014. Wild leafy vegetable use and knowledge across multiple sites in Morocco: A case study for transmission of local knowledge? Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 10:34.
Rastogi, A. and S. Shukla. 2013. Amaranth: A new millennium crop of nutraceutical values. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 53:109–125.
Reyes-García, V., V. Vadez, T. Huanca, W. R. Leonard, and T. McDade. 2007. Economic development and local ecological knowledge: A deadlock? Quantitative research from a native Amazonian society. Human Ecology 35:371–377.
Robertson, G. P. and S. M. Swinton. 2005. Reconciling agricultural productivity and environmental integrity: A grand challenge for agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3:38–46.
Schönfeldt, H. and B. Pretorius. 2011. The nutrient content of five traditional South African dark green leafy vegetables—A preliminary study. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 24:1141–1146.
Sileshi, G., F. K. Akinnifesi, O. C. Ajayi, S. Chakeredza, S. Mng’omba, and B. I. Nyoka. 2008. Towards sustainable management of soil biodiversity in agricultural landscapes in Africa. Biodiversity 9:64–67.
Smith, F. I. and P. Eyzaguirre. 2007. African leafy vegetables: Their role in the World Health Organization's global fruit and vegetables initiative. Pages 1–8 in R. Oniang’o, M. Grum, and E. Obel-Lawson, eds., Developing African leafy vegetables for improved nutrition, Regional workshop, 6–9 December 2005. Rural Outreach Program, Nairobi.
Sogbohossou, O. E. D. and E. G. Achigan-Dako. 2014. Phenetic differentiation and use-type delimitation in Amaranthus spp. from worldwide origins. Scientia Horticulturae 178:31–42.
Souto, T. and T. Ticktin. 2012. Understanding interrelationships among predictors (age, gender, and origin) of local ecological knowledge. Economic Botany 66:149–164.
Srithi, K., H. Balslev, P. Wangpakapattanawong, P. Srisanga, and C. Trisonthi. 2009. Medicinal plant knowledge and its erosion among the Mien (Yao) in northern Thailand. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 123:335–342.
Vandebroek, I. and M. J. Balick. 2012. Globalization and loss of plant knowledge: Challenging the paradigm. PLoS One 7:e37643.
Voeks, R. A. 2007. Are women reservoirs of traditional plant knowledge? Gender, ethnobotany and globalization in northeast Brazil. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 28:7–20.
——— and A. Leony. 2004. Forgetting the forest: Assessing medicinal plant erosion in eastern Brazil. Economic Botany 58:S294–S306.
Vorster, H. and W. Van Rensburg. 2005. Traditional vegetables as a source of food in South Africa: Some experiences. African Crop Science Society Conference Proceedings 7:669–671.
Wilson, G. F. and F. E. Caveness. 1980. The effects of rotation crops on the survival of root-knot, root-lesion and spiral nematodes. Nematropica 10:56–61.
Yadav, S. and S. Sehgal. 2002. Effect of domestic processing and cooking methods on total, HCl extractable iron and in vitro availability of iron in spinach and amaranth leaves. Nutrition and Health 16:113–120.
Yang, R. and G. B. Keding. 2009. Nutritional contributions of important African indigenous vegetables. In: African indigenous vegetables in urban agriculture, eds. C. M. Shackleton, M. W. Pasquini, and A. Dresche, 105–143. Earthscan.
Young, J., A. Watt, P. Nowicki, D. Alard, J. Clitherow, K. Henle, R. Johnson, E. Laczko, D. McCracken, and S. Matouch. 2005. Towards sustainable land use: Identifying and managing the conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation in Europe. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:1641–1661.
Zarger, R. K. and J. R. Stepp. 2004. Persistence of botanical knowledge among Tzeltal Maya children. Current Anthropology 45:413–418.
Zeashan, H., G. Amresh, S. Sing, and C. V. Rao. 2009a. Antidiarrheal and antiulcer activity of Amaranthus spinosus in experimental animals. Pharmaceutical Biology 47:932–939.
———, ———, ———, and ———. 2009b. Hepatoprotective and antioxidant activity of Amaranthus spinosus against CCl4 induced toxicity. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 125:364–366.
Acknowledgments
We kindly acknowledge Prof. Robert Voeks and Dr. Orou Gaoue for their personal contributions to the improvement of the paper. We also thank the two anonymous referees for their critical and insightful comments and suggestions. We are indebted to the farmers of Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Sô-ava, and Sèmè-Kpodji for sharing generously their knowledge and experience with us.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sogbohossou, O.E.D., Achigan-Dako, E.G., Assogba Komlan, F. et al. Diversity and Differential Utilization of Amaranthus spp. along the Urban-Rural Continuum of Southern Benin. Econ Bot 69, 9–25 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-014-9294-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-014-9294-3