Abstract
Oxytocin (OT) is a neuropeptide associated with trauma, sociality, and depression. Despite the widely accepted assumption of OT playing a role in the etiology of mood and anxiety disorders, associations between stressful life events, depression, and epigenetic regulation of the gene coding for OT (OXT) have not yet been investigated. We therefore aimed to examine the interrelations of stressful life events, depression severity, and methylation of the promoter region of OXT in a sample of N = 146 inpatients suffering from major depression. We found significant negative associations of stressful life events with mean methylation status as well as with methylation status of single CpG sites in the promoter region of OXT. There was no association between depression severity and OXT methylation. However, there were significant sex differences in methylation status of OXT with women showing higher methylation rates than men, putatively suggesting that in depression OXT is less activated in females compared to males. These results speak against an association of OXT methylation and depression severity, but support the assumption of a dysregulation of the OT system due to life stress. Our findings further emphasize the importance of including sex as an important factor in the investigation of the interrelations between OXT, stress, and depression.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The neuropeptide oxytocin (OT) was originally known for its role in lactation (for a review, see Richard et al. 1991) and parturition (Russell et al. 2003). However, in humans, OT also acts as a neuromodulator in neural networks associated with trust (Kosfeld et al. 2005; for replication problems, see Nave et al. 2015), empathy (Decety and Batson 2009), and sociality (Jack et al. 2012). Therefore, it is a key element fostering the social bond between caretaker and infant as well as cohesion of families and social groups (Montag and Davis 2018; Waller et al. 2015). OT is synthesized as inactive precursor in the hypothalamus along with its carrier protein neurophysin I. The oxytocin-neurophysin I gene (OXT) is localized on human chromosome 20p13 (Rao et al. 1992).
Even though humans rely most strongly for their survival on social interactions and communication, they also have a history of within-species aggression, abuse, and warfare (Hrdy 2009). These are extreme forms of situations causing discomfort by shuttering an individual’s sense of security or invulnerability to harm. Such stressful life events (SLEs) are assumed to trigger long-lasting to persistent hyper(re-)activity of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis via epigenetic mechanisms (McGowan et al. 2009; Murgatroyd et al. 2009; Roth et al. 2009). Persistent HPA hyper(re-)activity, which in turn increases stress vulnerability, has been identified as an important mechanism for the development of depression (Heim and Binder 2012; Heim et al. 2000). Depending on the nature of the stressor (e.g., psychosocial stress or physical experience), OT is released in stress-sensitive brain areas, thereby modulating the stress response (de Jong et al. 2015; Pierrehumbert et al. 2010; Winter and Jurek 2019). Also, the affective neuroscience theory by Panksepp (2004) suggests that in situations of sadness (caused by separation-distress), the administration of OT might be able to downregulate the activity of the SADNESSFootnote 1 circuitry. Even though the exact functional relevance of OT in HPA axis activity is not yet fully understood (Jurek et al. 2015), SLEs are associated with dysregulation of the endogenous OT system (Donadon et al. 2018) and are well-established major risk factors for the development of major depression (Culverhouse et al. 2018; Heim and Nemeroff 2001). SLEs may exert their pathogenic effect via epigenetic pathways (Szyf and Bick 2013).
Epigenetics is considered bridging the gap between genotype and phenotype. This term is used to describe changes in gene expression without changes in the underlying DNA sequence. An example of epigenetics is cell differentiation: Nearly all cells of a multicellular organism share one identical genotype. Nonetheless, a diversity of cell types with disparate, yet stable, profiles of gene expression and, therefore, distinct cell functions emerges during the development of an organism (Goldberg et al. 2007). However, a gene’s activity may also be influenced by environmental signals, thus depending upon interindividual context (Weaver et al. 2004). Epigenetic regulation comprises mechanisms like DNA methylation, histone modifications, and noncoding RNAs. Probably, the most extensively investigated and characterized epigenetic biochemical modification of chromatin is DNA methylation (Feil and Fraga 2012). DNA methylation has been mainly examined at the 5′-position of cytosine residues of CpG dinucleotides. Genomic regions with a high density of CpG sites are referred to as CpG islands and can be found in the promoter regions of many genes (Bird 1986). DNA methylation can modify histone–DNA interactions, thus altering a gene’s accessibility for transcription factors and thereby gene expression (Meaney and Szyf 2005). Methylation of CpG sites in the promoter region of a gene can for example prevent (but may also enhance) transcription factor binding and lead to a decline (or an increase) in transcription rate (Lim and Maher 2010; Watt and Molloy 1988). The role of DNA methylation in gene transcription inspired many scientists searching for potentially reversible biomarkers for disease risk and maintenance in humans (McGowan et al. 2009; Murgatroyd et al. 2009; Roth et al. 2009).
An early study focused on the examination of the glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) (Weaver et al. 2004) being closely associated with the HPA axis (Liu et al. 1997). In that study investigating the interaction of early life stress, DNA methylation, and HPA reactivity later in life, early life stress was operationalized as poor maternal care in a rat model (Weaver et al. 2004). Parenting in mammals is affected by hormones with OT playing a vital role (Feldman and Bakermans-Kranenburg 2017). OT is also associated with trauma (Donadon et al. 2018), HPA axis activity (Winter and Jurek 2019), and depressive-like behavior (Bosch and Young 2017; Jurek and Neumann 2018).
The focus of previous research regarding stress, DNA methylation, and depression has been on the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR). Results of previous studies with regard to the association between exposure to prenatal stress and OXTR methylation were heterogeneous: One study found significant hypermethylation of the OXTR to be associated with maternal perinatal depressive symptoms (King et al. 2017). Another study reports that the total number of maternal adversities was negatively associated with OXTR methylation in cord blood (Unternaehrer et al. 2016). Last, there are studies reporting no significant association between prenatal exposure to maternal stress and OXTR methylation in cord blood (Rijlaarsdam et al. 2017) and between depressive symptoms in pregnancy and placental OXTR methylation (Galbally et al. 2018). On the other hand, early life adversity as well as persistent stressors has been shown to be associated with OXTR methylation (Gouin et al. 2017; Simons et al. 2017). Associations between methylation patterns of OXTR and depression diagnosis also differ across studies: Whereas two studies report hypermethylation of CpG sites in the OXTR (Bell et al. 2015; Chagnon et al. 2015), other studies found a negative association of OXTR methylation and depressive symptoms (Kimmel et al. 2016) as well as depression diagnosis (Reiner et al. 2015). However, the only two studies we are aware of that investigated OXT methylation in humans examined OXT methylation and sociability (Haas et al. 2016) as well as dynamic DNA methylation changes in mothers and postpartum maternal intrusiveness (Toepfer et al. 2019). In the first study, OXT methylation was negatively associated with a secure attachment style, the ability to recognize emotional facial expressions, and greater superior temporal sulcus activity during two social–cognitive functional MRI tasks (Haas et al. 2016). The second study found OXT methylation to decrease from early to mid-pregnancy and no further change until late pregnancy. Additionally, intrusive compared to nonintrusive mothers had 6% higher methylation of one CpG site in the OXT promoter in late pregnancy (Toepfer et al. 2019). The interrelations between SLEs, DNA methylation of OXT, and depression have not yet been examined.
Therefore, we examined the associations between DNA methylation of the promoter region of OXT and SLEs as well as current depressive symptoms in a sample of N = 146 inpatients suffering from major depression. Since there are considerable sex differences in stress response (Bale 2011; Bale and Epperson 2015), we also explored whether there are sex differences in OXT promoter methylation and whether sex interacts with stressful life events in the prediction of OXT promoter methylation. We further explored correlational patterns between SLEs, DNA methylation, and depression severity, controlling for other variables potentially confounding these associations, such as age, body mass index (BMI), current medication, and substance use (Abraham and Fava 1999; de Wit et al. 2009; Dick et al. 2014; Ernst and Angst 1995; Feinberg et al. 2010; Lee and Pausova 2013; Philibert et al. 2012). Based on previous findings (Heim and Binder 2012; Heim and Nemeroff 2001), we assumed a positive association between SLEs and depression severity (see also the new Culverhouse et al. 2018 meta-analysis). Our overarching hypothesis for the association between OXT promoter methylation and SLEs or depression severity was that a higher number of SLEs is associated with high OXT methylation, presumably an indicator of lower transcription rate and therefore lower OT. This would coincide with the previously observed negative association between trauma and endogenous OT levels (Donadon et al. 2018). Since SLEs are positively associated with depression severity and presumably with OXT promoter methylation, one would assume OXT methylation and depression severity to be positively correlated as well. However, previous research showed an increased number of OXT-expressing neurons in the paraventricular nucleus in postmortem tissue of depressed patients (Purba et al. 1996) and an increase of OXT mRNA in melancholic type depressed patients (Meynen et al. 2007). Based thereon, low OXT methylation could also be associated with high depression severity. A previous study reported a correlation between SLEs and depression severity of r = 0.24 (Plieger et al. 2015). This indicates that there is a considerable proportion of unshared variance between the two variables. Consequentially, it is possible that there are diametrically opposed correlational patterns comparing the association between SLEs and OXT methylation to the association between OXT methylation and depression severity.
Patients and Methods
Participants
Data of N = 146 depressed inpatients (98 females) were collected. All participants were diagnosed for major depression (and no other mental illness) by a senior resident supervised by a psychiatrist at admission to the hospital using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association 2003). All participants were inpatients at the Department of Psychiatry at Ulm University and individually recruited. We calculated dose equivalents for antidepressants (weighted mean dose/fluoxetine 40 mg) (Hayasaka et al. 2015), received at the day of assessment. After completing the questionnaires described below, whole blood samples were taken and a standardized interview was conducted comprising a standardized semistructured inhouse questionnaire on sociodemographic variables and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) to assess depression severity (Montgomery and Asberg 1979).
We also assessed the BMI measuring the height and weight of the participants. As a measure for substance use, we assessed frequency and dose of consumption as well as the kind of alcoholic drinks and caffeine containing products consumed in the reported frequency and dose. We then calculated grams per day for alcohol, cigarettes per day for nicotine, and milligrams per day for caffeine use. All participants provided written consent prior to participation (Table 1). The ethics committee of Ulm University, Ulm, Germany, approved the study.
Questionnaires
CLEQ
The Critical Life Events Questionnaire (CLEQ) assesses 30 potentially traumatic life events, such as experience of violence, natural disaster, man-made disaster, or death of a close person (Plieger et al. 2015). A weighted score was calculated adding up the product of the occurrence of each event and the experienced severity. If there were nine or more incompletely answered events, participants were excluded from further analysis with the CLEQ.
BDI-II
We also administered the Beck depression inventory (German version, BDI-II) to assess individual differences in the severity of depressive symptoms (Beck et al. 2006). The BDI-II consists of 21 items each assessing the current state of a symptom of depression with four given options (0–3). A total score is calculated adding up the scores of the 21 items. Higher scores indicate higher depression severity. Internal consistency was excellent with α = 0.91.
Analyses of OXT Methylation
We selected the target region for methylation analysis based upon a previous study (Haas et al. 2016). Methylation status of the CpG-rich regions in the promoter of OXT (Fig. 1) was quantified by varionostic GmbH (Ulm, Germany) using the Sequenom Epityper MassArray System (San Diego, CA, USA). At first, genomic DNA from peripheral blood samples was automatically purified by means of the MagNA Pure® 96 system using a commercial extraction kit (MagNA Pure 96 DNA kit; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Afterwards, genomic DNA was bisulfite treated. The bisulfite treatment and all steps of the EpiTYPER assay were performed under routine conditions as outlined in the manufacturer’s suggested protocol. For the region of interest, amplicons were designed using Agena’s EpiDESIGNER software (San Diego, CA, USA). These amplicons were PCR amplified using the following primers: forward (aggaagagagGATTAGGGTTGG-GGATTTATTTTG) and reverse (cagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctACCTTCTATACCCAA-ACCATTAACC) corresponding to chr20:3,071,425–3,071,795.
In the next step, in vitro RNA transcription with subsequent base-specific cleavage using RNase A was performed resulting in fragmented RNA molecules. These RNA molecules may contain more than one CpG site. Cleavage products derived from methylated and unmethylated DNA are of identical length and differ only in their nucleotide composition due to bisulfite treatment. After sample conditioning, products were processed on a MALDI-TOF platform (Agena; MassARRAY 4). The different cleavage products created from methylated or unmethylated regions generated characteristic signal patterns that provided the basis for analysis by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. In analyzing the mass spectrum, the relative amount of methylation was calculated by comparing the difference in signal intensity between mass signals of the cleavage products and mass signals derived from completely methylated and unmethylated template DNA. Multiple CpG sites on one RNA molecule were analyzed as CpG unit.
Methylation status of the analyzed regions of the promoter OXT was examined with respect to single CpG sites or units as well as weighted (CpG units of two CpG sites were doubly weighted) mean methylation status across all 14 sites/units (α = 0.97; mean DNA methylation: M = 0.38; SD = 0.07; min = 0.20; max = 0.59). Figure 2 presents boxplots of the methylation status for all examined CpG sites showing that there were no outliers or severe deviations from normality.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using R (R Development Core Team 2008). We computed partial Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (rp) with sex, age, BMI, substance use (alcohol, nicotine, caffeine), and dose equivalents of antidepressants (weighted mean dose/fluoxetine 40 mg) (Hayasaka et al. 2015) as covariates to explore the association between the CLEQ score and depression severity (MADRS, BDI-II). We used the same approach to examine the associations of the methylation status of single CpG units in the promoter region of OXT and SLEs. Missing data was deleted pairwise. We used Spearman’s rank correlation because some of the examined variables had outliers.
We additionally performed a hierarchical multiple regression analysis with mean methylation of OXT as dependent variable; age, BMI, substance use, and dose equivalents of antidepressants as covariates; and sex as well as CLEQ score as independent variables. In the next step, we added the interaction between sex and CLEQ score. Statistical significance was determined at p < 0.05.
Results
SLEs and Depression Severity
After controlling for sex, age, BMI, substance use, and dose equivalents of antidepressants, we found no significant correlation between the CLEQ score and depression severity according to the MADRS (rp = 0.17, p = 0.050, one-tailed, n.s.). However, the CLEQ score was significantly positively correlated with depression severity assessed with the BDI-II (rp = 0.27, p = 0.003, one-tailed). The result pattern did not change with separate analysis of the correlations in women and men (rwomen = 0.23, p = 0.036; rmen = 0.39, p = 0.024).
Mean Methylation of the Promoter Region of OXT
There was no significant association between mean methylation status of OXT and depression severity, neither for MADRS (rp = 0.02, p = 0.416, one-tailed) nor for BDI-II scores (rp = 0.04, p = 0.330, one-tailed).
The regression model with age, BMI, substance use, and dose equivalents of antidepressants as covariates and sex as well as the CLEQ score as independent variables explained a significant amount of variance in mean OXT methylation (adjusted R2 = 0.15, F(8, 90) = 3.25, p = 0.003). Sex and the CLEQ score were significant predictors of mean OXT methylation (Table 2). Females had significantly higher methylation status than males. Further, higher CLEQ scores indicating more stressful life events were associated with low mean OXT promoter methylation.
Adding the interaction of sex and CLEQ score to our model did not result in a significant increase in explained variance (adjusted R2 = 0.17, F(2, 86) = 0.13, p = 0.71). Hence, there was no significant interaction of sex and CLEQ score in the prediction of mean OXT methylation (b = − 0.001, SE = 0.001, t(89) = − 1.45, p = 0.15).
Single CpG Sites
To further explore the association of OXT methylation and depression severity, we performed partial correlation analyses examining the association between the methylation of single CpG units in the OXT promoter and depression severity (as measured with the MADRS and the BDI-II) controlling for sex, age, BMI, substance use, and antidepressive medication. None of the single CpG sites or units was significantly associated with depression severity measured with the MADRS (partial Spearman’s correlation coefficients ranged from rp = − 0.03 to rp = 0.11, all p values > 0.05). There were two single CpG units significantly positively associated with BDI-II score: CpG 19 (rp = 0.11, p = 0.026, one-tailed) and CpG 24.25 (rp = 0.20, p = 0.040, one-tailed). However, after Benjamini–Hochberg correction (Benjamini and Hochberg 2000) controlling false discovery rate (FDR), none of these two correlations remained significant (p values > 0.300, one-tailed).
We did not find significant correlation coefficients between single CpG sites in the OXT promoter and depression severity (with age, BMI, substance use, and dose equivalents of antidepressants as covariates) looking at men and women separately, even before controlling FDR (results not shown).
We additionally performed partial correlation analyses for the association of the methylation of single CpG sites with CLEQ score. Before controlling FDR, eight of the 14 CpG units correlated significantly negative with the CLEQ score (Table 3). Even after controlling FDR, seven of these eight CpG units were significantly negatively correlated with critical life events. Correlation coefficients ranged from rp = − 0.29 to rp = 0.04 and all but two correlation coefficients were negative.
When looking at correlations of single CpG sites in the OXT promoter and CLEQ score for men and women separately (with age, BMI, substance use, and dose equivalents of antidepressants as covariates), all but two correlation coefficients were negative (Table 4). In men, correlation coefficients were higher, but sample size was smaller than in women. After controlling FDR, none of the CpG units was significantly associated with the CLEQ score. This could be due to the smaller sample size.
Discussion
We examined the associations between critical life events, depression severity, and methylation of the promoter region of OXT in a sample of N = 146 inpatients suffering from major depression. SLEs were significantly positively associated with depression severity as measured by means of the BDI-II. Contradictory to our hypothesis, we did not find an association of OXT promoter methylation and severity of depressive symptoms after controlling FDR. Nevertheless, OXT promoter methylation at two CpG units was significantly positively associated with depression severity measured with the BDI-II before controlling FDR. Furthermore, we observed a significant negative association between SLEs and mean OXT methylation. The negative association was also obtained for seven out of 14 single CpG units. The correlation coefficients between single CpG units and SLEs were negative for all but two CpG units. Sex and SLEs were significant predictors of mean OXT promoter methylation even after controlling for age, BMI, substance use, and antidepressive medication. Females showed a significantly higher methylation status of the OXT promoter.
OXT Methylation and Depression Severity
We did not observe a significant association between OXT promoter methylation and depression severity after controlling FDR. In accordance, a recent meta-analysis concluded that there is no association between the endogenous OT concentration and depression diagnosis (Engel et al. 2019b). However, since nonsignificance of this association after FDR correction could also be a result of our sample size, we briefly discuss the findings without FDR correction: Two CpG sites were significantly positively associated with depression severity as measured with the BDI-II. The associations’ direction was contradictory to previous results (Meynen et al. 2007; Purba et al. 1996). However, provided that high OXT promoter methylation is associated with low transcription rate and finally with low brain oxytocin, our finding would fit theories postulating depression to be a shutdown mechanism to terminate protracted separation distress (Panksepp and Watt 2011; Watt and Panksepp 2009). This is also in line with a previous study reporting a negative association between plasma levels of oxytocin and depressive symptom severity (Scantamburlo et al. 2007). Further, there is considerable heterogeneity in the results regarding the association between the methylation status of the OXTR and depression. While some studies report a hypermethylation of the OXTR to be related to depression diagnosis (Bell et al. 2015; Chagnon et al. 2015), others found a negative association between OXTR methylation and depressive symptoms (Kimmel et al. 2016) as well as depression diagnosis (Reiner et al. 2015). This heterogeneity could be an artifact of sample composition and operationalization. While three studies focused on middle aged women (Bell et al. 2015; Kimmel et al. 2016; Reiner et al. 2015), one study investigated women aged 65 or older (Chagnon et al. 2015). Additionally, one study investigated depression and/or dysthymia (Reiner et al. 2015), one study focused on major depressive episodes as well as minor depression (Chagnon et al. 2015), and the other two studies examined postpartum depression (PPD) (Bell et al. 2015; Kimmel et al. 2016). However, it could also reflect the heterogeneity of depression itself: Patients suffering from depression often show different symptoms (even diametrically opposed in case of appetite and sleep). Perhaps, different subtypes of depression might be associated with a distinct etiology and with specific methylation patterns.
Sex and OXT Methylation
Sex and SLEs were significant predictors of mean OXT promoter methylation even after controlling for age, BMI, substance use, and antidepressive medication. Females showed a significantly higher methylation status of the OXT promoter. This observation is in line with the assumption of biological sex differences in brain functioning contributing to sex differences in the prevalence of major depression (Albert 2015). Supporting evidence for OXT playing a role in sex differences considering the prevalence of mood disorders stems from research postulating OT to be involved in the development of postpartum depression (Jobst et al. 2016; Lara-Cinisomo et al. 2017). In these studies, postpartum depressive symptoms were associated with lower levels of plasma OT (Jobst et al. 2016; Lara-Cinisomo et al. 2017). This is in line with our results of higher OXT promoter methylation status in women, since promoter methylation is often suggested being a mechanism of gene silencing (Jones and Takai 2001). Alternatively, sex differences in the OT system could be independent of the diagnosis of major depression.
Moreover, endogenous OT concentrations fluctuate together with concentrations of female sex hormones. A recent meta-analysis showed a significant increase of OT concentrations from the early follicular phase to ovulation and a significant decrease from ovulation to the mid-luteal phase (Engel et al. 2019a). Additionally, a recent study showed that OXT promoter methylation changed dynamically throughout pregnancy (Toepfer et al. 2019) rendering a menstrual cycle-dependent change in OXT methylation possible. However, it is, to the best of our knowledge, unknown how OXT promoter methylation is affected by female sex hormones and associated with immediate changes in endogenous OT concentrations. Further, it is unknown how epigenetic modifications of other genes playing a role for the endogenous OT system (e.g., the OXTR) interact in this regard. Nevertheless, there is a possibility that the observed sex difference in OXT promoter methylation is due to the fact that we did not control for phases of the menstrual cycle in women. Thus, the result of a sex difference in mean OXT methylation should be considered preliminary and needs further examination.
SLEs and OXT Methylation
Contradictory to our hypotheses, we found a significant negative association between SLEs and mean OXT methylation. The CLEQ score assesses stressors across the lifespan. Thus, the CLEQ score being associated with reduced OXT promoter methylation with respect to mean methylation as well as single CpG sites is in line with previous results showing significant associations between early life adversities as well as persistent adverse environments and OXTR methylation (Gouin et al. 2017; Simons et al. 2017). It is, however, worth mentioning that future investigations of stressors occurring early versus late in life could shed light on different OXT and OXTR methylation patterns depending on the timing of the stressor.
Our results are also in line with a recent review suggesting trauma to be associated with dysregulation of the endogenous OT system (Donadon et al. 2018). Even though trauma showed a moderate negative association with endogenous OT concentrations in this review, the suggested relationship between trauma and OT is considered multifaceted and complex (Donadon et al. 2018). In line with this, OT can also promote “antisocial” behavior with its effects depending on various contextual and individual factors like gender or psychopathology (Shamay-Tsoory and Abu-Akel 2016). In accordance, increased OT has been associated with symptoms of social detachment (Munro et al. 2013). Trauma is assumed to promote social avoidance (Classen et al. 2001) and negative assumptions regarding interpersonal relationships (DePrince et al. 2009). OT is associated with agonistic tendencies in individuals chronically predisposed to perceive the social milieu as unsafe (Olff et al. 2013). Thus, it is possible that an interaction of SLEs and stress-induced low OXT promoter methylation is associated with a higher vulnerability for developing depressive disorders. In more detail, SLEs were associated with lower OXT methylation (and presumably higher OT) in our sample of depressed inpatients. Since trauma is also associated with perceiving social situations in negative terms (Classen et al. 2001; DePrince et al. 2009), the “antisocial” effects of OT may be triggered in individuals having low stress-induced OXT promoter methylation which may predispose these individuals to depression development. After all, depression often is associated with social withdrawal, feelings of inferiority, and social anxiety (Gilbert 2000). On the other hand, the negative association between OXT promoter methylation and SLEs could be an adaptive reaction counteracting trauma-induced hyper(re-)activity of the HPA axis (Heim et al. 2000). This hypothesis is congruent with the results of one study, which found lower OXT methylation to be associated with more secure attachment styles and an improved ability to recognize emotional facial expressions, both arguably features of human sociability (Haas et al. 2016). Insecure attachment styles are a potential mediator for the relationship between SLEs and depressive symptoms later in life (Hankin 2005). OT, on the other hand, can enhance the experience of attachment security (Buchheim et al. 2009). Thus, it would be an adaptive process to have higher OT-induced sociability and concomitantly recruit social resources after trauma exposure. After all, poor social support following trauma is among the greatest risk factors for the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (Ozer et al. 2003). However, these hypotheses should be tested using a longitudinal case–control design and comparison of populations suffering from different psychiatric disorders with respect to SLE-associated methylation patterns in the OXT promoter.
Limitations
There are some limitations that need to be considered when interpreting the results of the present study. First, we assessed methylation data by analyzing peripheral leukocytes possibly not providing a direct index of methylation status in the central nervous system. However, there are findings indicating high convergences between CpG island methylation levels across different tissues (Byun et al. 2009; Smith et al. 2015; Tylee et al. 2013). Second, although we investigated a relatively large number of CpG sites in our target region, our investigation is not exhaustive in terms of the CpG-rich region in OXT. However, we decided on investigating the only region that has been examined in previous studies in terms of DNA methylation (Haas et al. 2016; Toepfer et al. 2019). Third, we did not assess OXT mRNA or protein levels. Therefore, our study has no implications for OXT transcription. Lastly, data of a control group is missing so that any conclusions about the specificity of the findings with regard to depression are not warranted.
Conclusion
In conclusion, methylation status of two single CpG units was positively associated with depression severity before controlling FDR. Moreover, mean methylation as well as methylation status of single CpG sites in the OXT promoter was negatively associated with SLEs in a sample of depressed inpatients. These findings support the importance of the OT system in the development of or the resilience to psychopathology. In addition, there were sex differences in the epigenetic regulation of OXT promoting the assumed sex-specific effects of OT. This is important since sex-dependent regulation of the OT system could be relevant for the etiology and treatment of major depression. Therefore, future studies should examine the interrelations between SLEs, epigenetic regulation of OXT, and depression with respect to sex differences using a case–control design.
Notes
Written in capital letters in order to refer to the Pankseppian nomenclature (Davis and Montag 2019).
References
Abraham HD, Fava M (1999) Order of onset of substance abuse and depression in a sample of depressed outpatients. Compr Psychiatry 40(1):44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-440X(99)90076-7
Albert PR (2015) Why is depression more prevalent in women? J Psychiatry Neurosci 40(4):219–221. https://doi.org/10.1503/JPN.150205
American Psychiatric Association (2003) In: Sass H, Wittchen HU, Zaudig M, Houben I (eds) Diagnostisches und statistisches Manual psychischer Störungen: Textrevision, 4th edn. Hogrefe, Göttingen
Bale TL (2011) Sex differences in prenatal epigenetic programing of stress pathways. Stress 14(4):348–356. https://doi.org/10.3109/10253890.2011.586447
Bale TL, Epperson CN (2015) Sex differences and stress across the lifespan. Nat Neurosci 18(10):1413–1420. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4112
Beck A, Steer R, Brown G (2006) In: Hautzinger M, Keller F, Kühner C (eds) Beck-Depressions-Inventar–Revision (BDI-II). Deutsche Version. Harcourt Test Services, Frankfurt/Main
Bell AF, Carter CS, Steer CD, Golding J, Davis JM, Steffen AD et al (2015) Interaction between oxytocin receptor DNA methylation and genotype is associated with risk of postpartum depression in women without depression in pregnancy. Front Genet:6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00243
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (2000) On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics. J Educ Behav Stat Spring 25(1):60–83
Bird AP (1986) CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation. Nature 321(6067):209–213. https://doi.org/10.1038/321209a0
Bosch OJ, Young LJ (2017) Oxytocin and social relationships: from attachment to bond disruption. Springer, Cham, pp 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2017_10
Buchheim A, Heinrichs M, George C, Pokorny D, Koops E, Henningsen P, O’Connor MF, Gündel H (2009) Oxytocin enhances the experience of attachment security. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34(9):1417–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYNEUEN.2009.04.002
Byun H-M, Siegmund KD, Pan F, Weisenberger DJ, Kanel G, Laird PW, Yang AS (2009) Epigenetic profiling of somatic tissues from human autopsy specimens identifies tissue- and individual-specific DNA methylation patterns. Hum Mol Genet 18(24):4808–4817. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddp445
Chagnon YC, Potvin O, Hudon C, Préville M (2015) DNA methylation and single nucleotide variants in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and oxytocin receptor (OXTR) genes are associated with anxiety/depression in older women. Front Genet 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00230
Classen C, Field NP, Koopman C, Neville-Manning K, Spiegel D (2001) Interpersonal problems and their relationship to sexual revictimization among women sexually abused in childhood. J Interpersonal Violence 16(6):495–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626001016006001
Culverhouse RC, Saccone NL, Horton AC, Ma Y, Anstey KJ, Banaschewski T, Burmeister M, Cohen-Woods S, Etain B, Fisher HL, Goldman N, Guillaume S, Horwood J, Juhasz G, Lester KJ, Mandelli L, Middeldorp CM, Olié E, Villafuerte S, Air TM, Araya R, Bowes L, Burns R, Byrne EM, Coffey C, Coventry WL, Gawronski KAB, Glei D, Hatzimanolis A, Hottenga JJ, Jaussent I, Jawahar C, Jennen-Steinmetz C, Kramer JR, Lajnef M, Little K, Zu Schwabedissen HM, Nauck M, Nederhof E, Petschner P, Peyrot WJ, Schwahn C, Sinnamon G, Stacey D, Tian Y, Toben C, van der Auwera S, Wainwright N, Wang JC, Willemsen G, Anderson IM, Arolt V, Åslund C, Bagdy G, Baune BT, Bellivier F, Boomsma DI, Courtet P, Dannlowski U, de Geus EJC, Deakin JFW, Easteal S, Eley T, Fergusson DM, Goate AM, Gonda X, Grabe HJ, Holzman C, Johnson EO, Kennedy M, Laucht M, Martin NG, Munafò MR, Nilsson KW, Oldehinkel AJ, Olsson CA, Ormel J, Otte C, Patton GC, Penninx BWJH, Ritchie K, Sarchiapone M, Scheid JM, Serretti A, Smit JH, Stefanis NC, Surtees PG, Völzke H, Weinstein M, Whooley M, Nurnberger JI Jr, Breslau N, Bierut LJ (2018) Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression. Mol Psychiatry 23(1):133–142. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.44
Davis KL, Montag C (2019) Selected principles of Pankseppian affective neuroscience. Front Neurosci 12:1025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.01025
de Jong TR, Menon R, Bludau A, Grund T, Biermeier V, Klampfl SM et al (2015) Salivary oxytocin concentrations in response to running, sexual self-stimulation, breastfeeding and the TSST: the Regensburg Oxytocin Challenge (ROC) study. Psychoneuroendocrinology 62:381–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYNEUEN.2015.08.027
de Wit LM, van Straten A, van Herten M, Penninx BW, Cuijpers P (2009) Depression and body mass index, a u-shaped association. BMC Public Health 9(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-14
Decety J, Batson CD (2009) Empathy and morality: integrating social and neuroscience approaches. In: The moral brain. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6287-2_5
DePrince AP, Combs MD, Shanahan M (2009) Automatic relationship—harm associations and interpersonal trauma involving close others. Psychol Women Q 33(2):163–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01486.x
Dick KJ, Nelson CP, Tsaprouni L, Sandling JK, Aïssi D, Wahl S, Meduri E, Morange PE, Gagnon F, Grallert H, Waldenberger M, Peters A, Erdmann J, Hengstenberg C, Cambien F, Goodall AH, Ouwehand WH, Schunkert H, Thompson JR, Spector TD, Gieger C, Trégouët DA, Deloukas P, Samani NJ (2014) DNA methylation and body-mass index: a genome-wide analysis. Lancet 383(9933):1990–1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62674-4
Donadon MF, Martin-Santos R, de Osório FL (2018) The associations between oxytocin and trauma in humans: a systematic review. Front Pharmacol 9:154. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00154
Engel S, Klusmann H, Ditzen B, Knaevelsrud C, Schumacher S (2019a) Menstrual cycle-related fluctuations in oxytocin concentrations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neuroendocrinol 52:144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YFRNE.2018.11.002
Engel S, Laufer S, Knaevelsrud C, Schumacher S (2019b) The endogenous oxytocin system in depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology 101:138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYNEUEN.2018.11.011
Ernst C, Angst J (1995) Depression in old age. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 245(6):272–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02191869
Feil R, Fraga MF (2012) Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications. Nat Rev Genet 13(2):97–109. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3142
Feinberg AP, Irizarry RA, Fradin D, Aryee MJ, Murakami P, Aspelund T et al (2010) Personalized epigenomic signatures that are stable over time and covary with body mass index. Sci Transl Med 2(49):49ra67. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3001262
Feldman R, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ (2017) Oxytocin: a parenting hormone. Curr Opin Psychol 15:13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COPSYC.2017.02.011
Galbally M, Ryan J, van IJzendoorn M, Watson SJ, Spigset O, Lappas M et al (2018) Maternal depression, antidepressant use and placental oxytocin receptor DNA methylation: findings from the MPEWS study. Psychoneuroendocrinology 90:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYNEUEN.2018.01.004
Gilbert P (2000) The relationship of shame, social anxiety and depression: the role of the evaluation of social rank. Clin Psychol Psychother 7(3):174–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0879(200007)7:3<174::AID-CPP236>3.0.CO;2-U
Goldberg AD, Allis CD, Bernstein E (2007) Epigenetics: a landscape takes shape. Cell 128(4):635–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.006
Gouin JP, Zhou QQ, Booij L, Boivin M, Côté SM, Hébert M, Ouellet-Morin I, Szyf M, Tremblay RE, Turecki G, Vitaro F (2017) Associations among oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) DNA methylation in adulthood, exposure to early life adversity, and childhood trajectories of anxiousness. Sci Rep 7(1):7446–7414. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07950-x
Haas BW, Filkowski MM, Cochran RN, Denison L, Ishak A, Nishitani S, Smith AK (2016) Epigenetic modification of OXT and human sociability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(27):E3816–E3823. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602809113
Hankin BL (2005) Childhood maltreatment and psychopathology: prospective tests of attachment, cognitive vulnerability, and stress as mediating processes. Cogn Ther Res 29(6):645–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-9631-z
Hayasaka Y, Purgato M, Magni LR, Ogawa Y, Takeshima N, Cipriani A, Barbui C, Leucht S, Furukawa TA (2015) Dose equivalents of antidepressants: evidence-based recommendations from randomized controlled trials. J Affect Disord 180:179–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAD.2015.03.021
Heim C, Binder EB (2012) Current research trends in early life stress and depression: review of human studies on sensitive periods, gene–environment interactions, and epigenetics. Exp Neurol 233(1):102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EXPNEUROL.2011.10.032
Heim C, Nemeroff CB (2001) The role of childhood trauma in the neurobiology of mood and anxiety disorders: preclinical and clinical studies. Biol Psychiatry 49(12):1023–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01157-X
Heim C, Newport DJ, Heit S, Graham YP, Wilcox M, Bonsall R, Miller AH, Nemeroff CB (2000) Pituitary-adrenal and autonomic responses to stress in women after sexual and physical abuse in childhood. JAMA 284(5):592–597. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.5.592
Hrdy S (2009) Mothers and others: the evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=Hrdy+SB.+2009.+Mothers+and+Others%3A+The+Evolutionary+Origins+of+Mutual+Understanding.+Cambridge%2C+MA%3A+Belknap+Press%2C+Harvard+Univ.+Press. Accessed 13 May 2019
Jack A, Connelly JJ, Morris JP (2012) DNA methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene predicts neural response to ambiguous social stimuli. Front Hum Neurosci 6:280. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00280
Jobst A, Krause D, Maiwald C, Härtl K, Myint A-M, Kästner R, Obermeier M, Padberg F, Brücklmeier B, Weidinger E, Kieper S, Schwarz M, Zill P, Müller N (2016) Oxytocin course over pregnancy and postpartum period and the association with postpartum depressive symptoms. Arch Womens Ment Health 19(4):571–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-016-0644-2
Jones PA, Takai D (2001) The role of DNA methylation in mammalian epigenetics. Science (New York, N.Y.) 293(5532):1068–1070. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063852
Jurek B, Neumann ID (2018) The oxytocin receptor: from intracellular signaling to behavior. Physiol Rev 98(3):1805–1908. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00031.2017
Jurek B, Slattery DA, Hiraoka Y, Liu Y, Nishimori K, Aguilera G, Neumann ID, van den Burg EH (2015) Oxytocin regulates stress-induced Crf gene transcription through CREB-regulated transcription coactivator 3. J Neurosci 35(35):12248–12260. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1345-14.2015
Kimmel M, Clive M, Gispen F, Guintivano J, Brown T, Cox O, Beckmann MW, Kornhuber J, Fasching PA, Osborne LM, Binder E, Payne JL, Kaminsky Z (2016) Oxytocin receptor DNA methylation in postpartum depression. Psychoneuroendocrinology 69:150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYNEUEN.2016.04.008
King L, Robins S, Chen G, Yerko V, Zhou Y, Nagy C et al (2017) Perinatal depression and DNA methylation of oxytocin-related genes: a study of mothers and their children. Horm Behav 96:84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YHBEH.2017.09.006
Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak PJ, Fischbacher U, Fehr E (2005) Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435(7042):673–676. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03701
Lara-Cinisomo S, McKenney K, Di Florio A, Meltzer-Brody S (2017) Associations between postpartum depression, breastfeeding, and oxytocin levels in Latina mothers. Breastfeed Med 12(7):436–442. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2016.0213
Lee KWK, Pausova Z (2013) Cigarette smoking and DNA methylation. Front Genet 4:132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00132
Lim DHK, Maher ER (2010) DNA methylation: a form of epigenetic control of gene expression. Obstet Gynaecol 12(1):37–42. https://doi.org/10.1576/toag.12.1.037.27556
Liu D, Diorio J, Tannenbaum B, Caldji C, Francis D, Freedman A et al (1997) Maternal care, hippocampal glucocorticoid receptors, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal responses to stress. Science (New York, N.Y.) 277(5332):1659–1662. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.277.5332.1659
McGowan PO, Sasaki A, D’Alessio AC, Dymov S, Labonté B, Szyf M et al (2009) Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse. Nat Neurosci 12(3):342–348. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2270
Meaney MJ, Szyf M (2005) Environmental programming of stress responses through DNA methylation: life at the interface between a dynamic environment and a fixed genome. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 7(2):103–123 Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16262207. Accessed 23 October 2017
Meynen G, Unmehopa UA, Hofman MA, Swaab DF, Hoogendijk WJG (2007) Hypothalamic oxytocin mRNA expression and melancholic depression. Mol Psychiatry 12(2):118–119. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001911
Montag C, Davis KL (2018) Affective neuroscience theory and personality: an update. Pers Neurosci 1:e12. https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2018.10
Montgomery SA, Asberg M (1979) A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 134(4):382–389. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.134.4.382
Munro ML, Brown SL, Pournajafi-Nazarloo H, Carter CS, Lopez WD, Seng JS (2013) In search of an adult attachment stress provocation to measure effect on the oxytocin system. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc 19(4):180–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078390313492173
Murgatroyd C, Patchev AV, Wu Y, Micale V, Bockmühl Y, Fischer D et al (2009) Dynamic DNA methylation programs persistent adverse effects of early-life stress. Nat Neurosci 12(12):1559–1566. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2436
Nave G, Camerer C, McCullough M (2015) Does oxytocin increase trust in humans? A critical review of research. Perspect Psychol Sci 10(6):772–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615600138
Olff M, Frijling JL, Kubzansky LD, Bradley B, Ellenbogen MA, Cardoso C, Bartz JA, Yee JR, van Zuiden M (2013) The role of oxytocin in social bonding, stress regulation and mental health: an update on the moderating effects of context and interindividual differences. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38(9):1883–1894. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYNEUEN.2013.06.019
Ozer EJ, Best SR, Lipsey TL, Weiss DS (2003) Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 129(1):52–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.52
Panksepp J (2004) Affective neuroscience: the foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford University Press, New York
Panksepp J, Watt DF (2011) Why does depression hurt? Ancestral primary-process separation-distress (PANIC/GRIEF) and diminished brain reward (SEEKING) processes in the genesis of depressive affect. Psychiatry 74(1):5–13. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2011.74.1.5
Philibert RA, Plume JM, Gibbons FX, Brody GH, Beach SRH (2012) The impact of recent alcohol use on genome wide DNA methylation signatures. Front Genet 3:54. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2012.00054
Pierrehumbert B, Torrisi R, Laufer D, Halfon O, Ansermet F, Beck Popovic M (2010) Oxytocin response to an experimental psychosocial challenge in adults exposed to traumatic experiences during childhood or adolescence. Neuroscience 166(1):168–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROSCIENCE.2009.12.016
Plieger T, Melchers M, Montag C, Meermann R, Reuter M (2015) Life stress as potential risk factor for depression and burnout. Burn Res 2(1):19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BURN.2015.03.001
Purba JS, Hoogendijk WJG, Hofman MA, Swaab DF (1996) Increased number of vasopressin- and oxytocin-expressing neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus in depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 53(2):137–143. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830020055007
R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Austria, Vienna Retrieved from http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html. Accessed 22 November 2019
Rao G, Löffler C, Battey J, Hansmann I (1992) The human gene for oxytocin-neurophysin I (OXT) is physically mapped to chromosome 20p13 by in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Genome Res 61(4):271–273. https://doi.org/10.1159/000133420
Reiner I, Van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Bleich S, Beutel M, Frieling H (2015) Methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene in clinically depressed patients compared to controls: the role of OXTR rs53576 genotype. J Psychiatr Res 65:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPSYCHIRES.2015.03.012
Richard P, Moos F, Freund-Mercier MJ (1991) Central effects of oxytocin. Physiol Rev 71(2):331–370. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1991.71.2.331
Rijlaarsdam J, van IJzendoorn MH, Verhulst FC, Jaddoe VWV, Felix JF, Tiemeier H, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ (2017) Prenatal stress exposure, oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) methylation, and child autistic traits: the moderating role of OXTR rs53576 genotype. Autism Res 10(3):430–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1681
Roth TL, Lubin FD, Funk AJ, Sweatt JD (2009) Lasting epigenetic influence of early-life adversity on the BDNF gene. Biol Psychiatry 65(9):760–769 Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006322308015308. Accessed 22 March 2018
Russell JA, Leng G, Douglas AJ (2003) The magnocellular oxytocin system, the fount of maternity: adaptations in pregnancy. Front Neuroendocrinol 24(1):27–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-3022(02)00104-8
Scantamburlo G, Hansenne M, Fuchs S, Pitchot W, Maréchal P, Pequeux C, Ansseau M, Legros JJ (2007) Plasma oxytocin levels and anxiety in patients with major depression. Psychoneuroendocrinology 32(4):407–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYNEUEN.2007.01.009
Shamay-Tsoory SG, Abu-Akel A (2016) The social salience hypothesis of oxytocin. Biol Psychiatry 79(3):194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOPSYCH.2015.07.020
Simons RL, Beach RH, Cutrona CE, Philibert RA (2017) Methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene mediates the effect of adversity on negative schemas and depression. Dev Psychopathol 29(3):725–736. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579416000420
Smith AK, Kilaru V, Klengel T, Mercer KB, Bradley B, Conneely KN, Ressler KJ, Binder EB (2015) DNA extracted from saliva for methylation studies of psychiatric traits: evidence tissue specificity and relatedness to brain. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 168(1):36–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32278
Szyf M, Bick J (2013) DNA methylation: a mechanism for embedding early life experiences in the genome. Child Dev 84(1):49–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01793.x
Toepfer P, O’Donnell KJ, Entringer S, Garg E, Heim CM, Lin DTS et al (2019) Dynamic DNA methylation changes in the maternal oxytocin gene locus (OXT) during pregnancy predict postpartum maternal intrusiveness. Psychoneuroendocrinology 103:156–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYNEUEN.2019.01.013
Tylee DS, Kawaguchi DM, Glatt SJ (2013) On the outside, looking in: a review and evaluation of the comparability of blood and brain “-omes.”. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 162(7):595–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32150
Unternaehrer E, Bolten M, Nast I, Staehli S, Meyer AH, Dempster E, Hellhammer DH, Lieb R, Meinlschmidt G (2016) Maternal adversities during pregnancy and cord blood oxytocin receptor (OXTR) DNA methylation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 11(9):1460–1470. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw051
Waller C, Wittfoth M, Fritzsche K, Timm L, Wittfoth-Schardt D, Rottler E, Heinrichs M, Buchheim A, Kiefer M, Gündel H (2015) Attachment representation modulates oxytocin effects on the processing of own-child faces in fathers. Psychoneuroendocrinology 62:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYNEUEN.2015.07.003
Watt F, Molloy PL (1988) Cytosine methylation prevents binding to DNA of a HeLa cell transcription factor required for optimal expression of the adenovirus major late promoter. Gene Dev 2(9):1136–1143 Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3192075. Accessed 22 March 2018
Watt DF, Panksepp J (2009) Depression: an evolutionarily conserved mechanism to terminate separation distress? A review of aminergic, peptidergic, and neural network perspectives. Neuropsychoanalysis 11(1):7–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/15294145.2009.10773593
Weaver ICG, Cervoni N, Champagne FA, D’Alessio AC, Sharma S, Seckl JR et al (2004) Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nat Neurosci 7(8):847–854. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1276
Winter J, Jurek B (2019) The interplay between oxytocin and the CRF system: regulation of the stress response. Cell Tissue Res 375(1):85–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-018-2866-2
Funding
The position of CM is funded by a Heisenberg-grant awarded to him by the German Research Foundation (MO 2363/3-2).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.S., C.M., and M.K. designed the present study. S.S. analyzed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
There authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the ethics committee of Ulm University, Ulm, Germany (reference number: 25/18), and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sanwald, S., Gahr, M., Widenhorn-Müller, K. et al. Relation of Promoter Methylation of the Oxytocin Gene to Stressful Life Events and Depression Severity. J Mol Neurosci 70, 201–211 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-019-01446-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-019-01446-1