Abstract
Cancer, defined by the continuous, uncontrollable proliferation of cells in the human body, is a disease with a rapidly increasing incidence and mortality rate. Scientists are looking for novel ways to cure and prevent this sneaky disease because of the toxicity of contemporary chemotherapy and the cancer cells’ resilience to anticancer drugs. Determining the effect of herbal medicines, which do not have as harmful side effects as synthetic drugs, on cancer cell lines is an essential preliminary study in the production of effective drugs against cancer. In this study, the phenolic acid profile, antioxidant capacity, and cytotoxicity of the medicinal plant Mespilus germanica (MG) leaf extract were determined, and its effects on the expression of some apoptotic, necrotic, and autophagic pathway genes of MCF7 (Human breast cancer line) and A549 (Human lung cancer line) and healthy HDF (Human Dermal Fibroblasts) cells were investigated for the first time. The LCMS device detected many important phenolic compounds previously reported to act against cancer cells in Mespilus germanica leaf extract. DPPH and total phenolic content showed high antioxidant capacity. The cytotoxicity of MG was determined by the MTT method. The levels of mRNA transcription for Atg5, Atg3, Rıpk1, Bcl2, Bax, Apaf1, Caspase-8, Caspase-7, Caspase-3, and Caspase-9, as well as the expression patterns of the DNA damage markers P53 and Parp-1 genes, were assessed. MG leaf extract did not cause significant toxicity against healthy HDF cells. However, it had a cytotoxic effect on A549 and MCF7 cancer cell lines, increasing the transcription levels of essential genes involved in cell death mechanisms. This research is the first to analyze the phenolic components and antioxidant capabilities of leaf extracts from Mespilus germanica. Additionally, it investigates the impact of these extracts on crucial genes involved in cell death pathways of A549 lung cancer, MCF7 breast cancer, and non-cancerous HDF (Human Dermal Fibroblasts) cells.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cancer is a pathological condition distinguished by unregulated growth and division of cells, invasion into neighboring tissues, and suppression of programmed cell death due to genetic or environmental determinants. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the global incidence of cancer in 2020 was approximately 19.3 million cases, accounting for one-sixth of all recorded deaths. While lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. So far, no effective treatment method has been developed against either cancer. Because they have fewer side effects, medicinal plants constitute an important research area for cancer treatment today [1].
The efficient management of cancer has not yet been accomplished despite significant advancements in understanding disease biology and the development of traditional therapies [2]. The cost of anticancer treatments is relatively high, and many of these drugs have harmful side effects, especially on healthy cells that proliferate rapidly. The most current treatments for the disease are chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and chemical drugs. However, the fact that chemotherapy causes many side effects in patients and causes more harm to their health directs scientists to alternative treatments and plant-based therapies against cancer [3]. Determining the impact of herbal drugs on cancer cell lines is considered the most effective preliminary study against cancer worldwide. Over 3,000 plant species have been researched for their possible anticancer properties to minimize these unfavorable consequences [4].
Phenolics are a class of plant secondary metabolites with remarkable antioxidant properties due to their redox properties. These compounds can effectively adsorb and counteract the harmful effects of free radicals, neutralize reactive oxygen species, and chelate iron and copper cations [5]. They have also been observed to exert a significant inhibitory effect on all stages of tumor growth and metastasis [6].
Apoptosis is a regulated cellular mechanism of self-destruction that serves a crucial function in preserving tissue equilibrium by eliminating surplus or aberrant cells. Atg5, Atg3, Rıpk1, Bcl2, Bax, Apaf1, Caspase-8, Caspase-9, Caspase-3, Caspase-7, Tp53, and Parp-1 play essential roles in both apoptosis, necrosis, autophagy and DNA damage mechanisms. Manipulating these pathways with more harmless phytochemicals than chemotherapeutics is a crucial strategy for cancer treatment. Therefore, it is highly desirable to develop novel medications that can be implemented as alternative approaches to cancer treatment. Plants are highly valued in this context due to their significant potential as sources of chemicals with diverse medicinal applications. Most anticancer medications are currently derived from botanical sources [7].
Mespilus germanica L. (Medlar), a member of the Amelanchier-Crataegus sister group [8], is a shrub plant of the Rosaceae family [9] rich in phytochemicals with potent antioxidant activities [10, 11]. Its fruits and leaves are also used in the treatment of enteritis [12], constipation, diuretics, kidney and bladder stones [13], wounds, mouth abscesses, diabetes, and microbial infections [14]. In general, leaf extracts of MG have been reported to show higher antioxidant activity than fruit extracts [15].
Although studies examine the effects of MG extract on different cancer cell lines [16], no study investigates its cytotoxic effects on A549 lung cancer, MCF7 breast cancer, and healthy fibroblast cells. Therefore, this study is the first to both detect the phenolic acids and antioxidant capacity of Mespilus germanica leaf extract and examine its effects on the transcription levels of cell death mechanisms’ key genes in A549, MCF7, and non-cancerous (healthy) HDF cells (Human Dermal Fibroblasts, adult).
Methods
Chemicals
Chemicals and phenolics standards used in this study are analytical and/or HPLC grade and purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany).
Plant Material
The leaves of Mespilus germanica L. were collected in July from the province of Van in Turkey (latitude: N38°34′33′′and longitude: E43°16'10 ′′) in 2021. Specialist Prof. Dr. Fevzi Özgökçe identified the Mespilus germanica plant. The voucher specimen is stored in VANF Herbarium with a 165247 voucher number and an F15537 collector number. The leaves were dried in the dark at room temperature (22 ± 2 °C), ground with a grinding mill (IKA, A 11 primary Analytical mill), and stored at −20 °C until the analyses.
Extraction Procedure
Phenolic compounds were extracted using the previous method [17] with some modifications. The ground leaves were extracted separately with a ratio of 1/20 (w:v) acetone, methanol, ethanol, and water. 5 g dry herb +100 ml 80% acidic acetone (80 ml acetone +19.9% purified water +0.1% acetic acid) was added. It was kept in an ultrasonic water bath (IsoLab-Laborgerate GmbH) for 1 h at 45 °C. Then, it was centrifuged (Hitachi-High speed refrigerated centrifuge-CR22N) at 15.320 g (10,000 rpm) for 10 min at +4 °C. The supernatant (upper liquid) was filtered with a 0.45 µm syringe tip filter and taken into an amber Eppendorf tube to store at +4 °C. After filtration, 80% acidic methanol (80 ml methanol +19.9% purified water +0.1% acetic acid) was added to the remaining pellet, and the same procedures were repeated. The liquid portion was taken, and the process was repeated by adding acidic ethanol (80 ml ethanol +19.9% purified water +0.1% acetic acid) to the remaining pellet. The previous processes were repeated by adding 100 ml of pure water to the remaining pellet for the last time. After centrifugation, it was filtered. The liquid obtained after filtration was combined with the supernatants obtained with acetone, methanol, and ethanol solvents. The resulting supernatant was evaporated (Heildolph) at 45 °C, 100 rpm for 45 min. Ultrapure Milli-Q water (18.2 MΩ cm resistivity) (from Milli-Q synthesis-Millipore) was added to the extract obtained after evaporation to come out of the flask. The residue was wholly removed from the flask and lyophilized (LyoQuerst-Telstar) at −80 °C at 0.05 psi pressure for 48 h to remove the contained water. The resulting extract was then stored at −20 °C for further use.
DPPH (2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) Analyses for Antioxidant Capacity
Using the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) free radical scavenging method (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), the antioxidant activity of the extracts was determined [18]. Methanol was utilized as a solubilizing medium. 10 ml of solvent was added to 8 mg of dry extract and vortexed. Then, 3.9 ml of DPPH solution was added to 0. 1 ml of extract according to the DPPH procedure. After incubation for 1 h in the dark, the absorbance of the samples was measured at 515 nm by the Multiskan® SkyHigh microplate spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). DPPH % inhibition value and IC50 of the extract were determined while α tocopherol was used as a control.
Determination of Total Phenolic Content
Total phenolic content (TPC) was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteau method [19]. The samples were measured at 760 nm by the Multiskan® SkyHigh microplate spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and the results were reported as Gallic acid equivalent (GAE) in milligrams per 100 grams of dry weight (Dw).
Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (Lcms) Analysis for Phenolic Acid Detection in Mespilus germanica Leaf Extract
LCMS was performed using a high-resolution MS composite of the Dionex UltiMate 3000 RS pump, the Dionex UltiMate 3000 RS autosampler, and the LC system with the Dionex UltiMate 3000 RS column furnace and Exactive Plus Orbitrap (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with a heated electrospray ionization interface. The Orbitrap-MS equipment was calibrated using positive (Pierce™ Ltq Velos Esi Positive Ion Calibration Solution) and negative (Pierce™ Negative Ion Calibration Solution) calibration solutions. This calibration process was carried out utilizing an automatic syringe injector manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific. The LC-HRMS analyses involved operating the LC and MS components concurrently using the TraceFinder 3.2 software (Thermo Scientific) installed on the computer system. The data acquisition and recording were performed using the Xcalibur software version 2.1.0.1140 (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
The analyses were conducted with a Phenomenex® Gemini® 3 µm Nx-C18 110 Å (100 mm × 2 mm) column. The temperature of the column furnace was set to 30 °C. A solution containing 2% (v/v) glacial acetic acid was created using ultrapure water from the Ultrapure water system (Gfl 2004/ Human power 1). This solution was utilized as the mobile A phase in an elution gradient. The mobile B phase comprised 99.9% pure methanol purchased from Sigma and was employed in LC-MS analysis.
The sample was injected with a volume of 20.0 µL, and the elution process followed a gradient profile at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The allocated time for analysis was established as a cumulative duration of 20 min.
Equipped with a heated electrospray ionization interface, the Orbitrap LCMS operated in positive (Full Ms/Aif) and negative (Full Ms/Aif) modes. Ionization interface sheath gas flow rate 35; auxiliary gas flow rate 7; spray voltage 3.5 kV; capillary temperature 350 °C; additional gas temperature 350 °C; S-lens RF level was set to 50. MS scan range 60–800 m/z; resolution 17,500; Acg target 3.106; maximum IT 2 ms; CE (collision energy)/ step CE was carried out under 25 V conditions.
All standards were prepared as 10ppb-20ppb-40ppb-60ppb-80ppb-100ppb-200ppb-300ppb-400ppb-500 ppb concentrations for the phytochemical compounds of the LC–Orbitrap HRMS analysis method, and each was injected in triplicate.
Ten milligrams of the sample were measured and dissolved in a 10-milliliter solution consisting of a 50% mixture of methanol and pure water. The resulting solution was then introduced into a vial with a volume of 1.5 milliliters using a polytetrafluoroethylene syringe filter with a pore size of 0.22 micrometers.
Cell Culture
The study materials comprised breast cancer MCF-7 cell line (Atcc® Crl-3435™) and lung cancer A549 cell line (Atcc® Ccl-185 ™) and, non-cancerous (healthy) HDF cells (Human Dermal Fibroblasts, Atcc® Pcs-201-012) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. The cells were cultured in vitro using regular passages in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM high glucose, Cat-No: 11965092) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Biological Industries, Certified FBS), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Capricorn, Cat-No: PSG-B), 1% L-glutamine (Capricorn, Cat-No: GLN-B). The cells were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 using an Esco CelCulture CO2 incubator (Changi, Singapore). All the other chemicals and reagents used were of high-purity grade and were obtained from commercial sources.
Preparation of Plant Extract Solutions Applied to Cell Culture
M. germanica plant extract was dissolved in the stock solution DMSO (Dimethyl sulfoxide). Final concentrations (100, 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 µg/ml) were prepared by dilution with the medium. In this dilution, the DMSO ratio was ready to have a nontoxic (≤0.005) effect.
2.9.Cytotoxicity (MTT (3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide) Cell Viability) Test
The in vitro cytotoxicity tests were done using the method explained by Meerleo et al. [20]. This method involves checking the oxidoreductase activity to see how quickly the tetrazolium salts change form. The MTT cell viability assay was used to find the IC50 values for the Mespilus germanica (MG) plant extract after 48 h. The A549 and MCF7 cell lines were incubated with MG extract for 48 h at final concentrations of 0 (control), 100, 200, 400, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 µg/ml. Subsequently, an MTT assay was conducted to determine the concentration of MG extract that resulted in the highest level of cell growth and cell death. The study was carried out in 3 groups in each cell line: control group (control), IC50 group (IC50), and Proliferative Group (Pro) group. Cell lines without extract application were considered the control group.
104 (10000) cells/mL were seeded into each well of a 96-well culture plate, and the cells were supplied with suitable growth conditions. The cells were incubated in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C for 24 h. After removing the medium from the cells, a new medium containing MG extract at varying concentrations was introduced. Four wells were used for every concentration of the MG extract. Following the completion of the 48-h incubation periods, the medium was removed from the cells. The MTT solution was produced in phosphate-buffered saline (Pbs P4417; Sigma Aldrich) with a 5 mg/mL concentration. The cell media mixture, which consisted of 10% MTT (M5655; Sigma Aldrich), was applied to each well. The plate was incubated at 37 °C for 3 h to transform the MTT dye into water-insoluble formazan crystals. MTT, a tetrazolium salt, transforms into formazan when reduced and gains electrons, causing it to change color. It turns out that the formazan is purple, while the MTT complex is yellow. The quantity of viable cells is directly proportional to the amount of formazan produced. Active mitochondria are the only ones that can break the tetrazolium ring, which means that the color change reaction can only happen in live cells. Dimethyl sulfoxide was used as a solvent to dissolve the purple formazan product, which was not soluble. We used an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay reader (Biochrom, Anthos Zenyth 200) with a wavelength of 570 nm to measure the optical density values of the cells [20]. The Microsoft Office Excel program was used to figure out the data of the MTT assay. When calculating the cell viability rate, the control group’s viability was 100%. Each dose’s impact on cell viability was evaluated using the formula [21]:
Reverse Transcription‐quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT‐qPCR) Analysis
The real-time qPCR method was used to evaluate the messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels of some critical genes that encode proteins involved in apoptosis, autophagy, necrosis, and DNA repair. After the treatment, the cells were removed from the surface of the flask using the trypsinization technique. Centrifugation was used to separate the collected cells from the supernatant. The cells were centrifuged a second time following a wash in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (Pbs). Using the Trizol (Life Technologies) reagent, the RNA of these cells was manually extracted [22].
The concentration and purity of RNA were measured using a nanodrop spectrophotometer (BioDrop; Biochrom). The acquired images revealed the presence of 28S, 18S, and 5S RNA. To obtain complementary DNA (cDNA) from RNA, a high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription isolation kit (Applied Biosystems™ Cat: 4368814, Lithuania) was utilized. After cDNAs were produced, PCR was carried out in the RT-qPCR device (Rotor-Gene Q; Qiagen) using Sybr Green master mix (Enzo Life Science cat: Enz-Nuc104–0200). The PCR program followed the kit procedure’s instructions (Table 1). Each sample was evaluated in triplicate.
The control gene utilized in this study was Actin Beta (Actb). The cycle at which the fluorescence levels of the gene products surpassed the cycle threshold (CT) value was identified. The calculation of gene expression levels was performed using the 2−ΔΔCT method [23]. The expression levels of the target genes were compared using the fold change number and subjected to statistical analysis. The levels of mRNA expression were checked for the Rıpk1 gene, which is linked to necrotic cell death; the Atg3 and Atg5 genes, which are linked to autophagic cell death; the Bcl2, Bax, Apaf1, Caspase-8, Caspase-9, Caspase-3, and Caspase-7 genes, which are linked to apoptotic cell death, and the P53 and Parp1 genes, which repair DNA damage. The nucleotide sequences of the primer bases for the target genes can be found in Table 2.
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analyses were conducted using the Spss version 22.0 software package. The Kruskal–Wallis test was employed to achieve a variance analysis across multiple groups. The descriptive statistics were analyzed using a one-way Anova and a post-hoc Bonferroni test. The parameters are reported in the form of mean ± standard deviation. The “2−ΔΔCt” of delta CT formulation was used to calculate the temporal variations between expressions to determine their difference. Statistical significance was determined for all intergroup analyses at a threshold of p < 0.05.
Results
LCMS and Total Phenolic Content Results
The chromatogram of standart used in LCMS device is given in Fig. 1. Possible phenolic compounds, retention time, m/z charge determined by LCMS are given in Table 3. The phenolic components in the MG extract were identified by comparing the peak areas with the curve of the relevant calibration standard [24].
The quantification of total phenolic content was conducted using the Folin-Ciocalteau method. The outcomes regarding gallic acid equivalent (mg GAE/kg dw) were quantified. The total phenolic content was measured as 420.31 ± 6.71 mg GAE/ml. The DPPH assay was carried out on the extract using a spectrophotometric technique [18] and equation :
The extract exhibited a DPPH % inhibition value of 55 ± 9.45. The IC50 value of the extract was determined to be 0.73 ± 0.14, while the IC50 value of α-tocopherol was found to be 0.54 ± 0.03. The DPPH value exhibited a more remarkable similarity to the antioxidant capacity of α-tocopherol, which was utilized as the positive control in our study.
MTT Results
MTT was performed at various times and concentrations to understand the cytotoxicity mechanism better. The study compared the cell viability rates with the control group. The control group’s viability rate was determined to be 100%. Every sample was tested three times. The parameter values are expressed as the mean ±the standard deviation.
After 48 h of administration of various concentrations of Mespilus germanica leaf extracts on cell lines, the proliferative concentration (100 µg/ml) was determined. MTT % viability results for MCF7 (Fig. 2) and A549 (Fig. 3) are given, assuming the control group is 100% viable. IC50 was determined as 770 µg/ml in the MCF7 cell line (Fig. 2) and 800 µg/ml in A549 cells (Fig. 3).
Real‐time‐qPCR Results
The levels of gene expression were compared to those of the control group. The data are presented as three repetitions’ average values (±standard deviation). There are notable differences compared to the control group, which are statistically significant (p < 0.05). The following figures (Figs. 4–6) display the identified gene expression levels.
The levels of mRNA expression were checked for the Rıpk1 gene, which is linked to necrotic cell death; the Atg3 and Atg5 genes, which are linked to autophagic cell death; the Bcl2, Bax, Apaf1, Caspase-8, Caspase-9, Caspase-3, and Caspase-7 genes, which are linked to apoptotic cell death, and the P53 and Parp1 genes, which repair DNA damage.
After the administration of the IC50 dose, a significant increase (p < 0.05) was determined in the transcription levels of autophagic genes Atg3, Atg5, and necrotic gene Rıpk1 in both cell lines compared to the control group (Fig. 4). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). MG extract increased Atg3 transcription by 38.33fold, Atg5 transcription by 3.84fold, and Rıpk1 transcription by 20fold in MCF7 cell lines compared to the control. In the A549 cell line, the transcription level of the Atg3 gene increased twofold, the Atg5 gene by 3.6fold, and the Rıpk1 gene by 6.58fold compared to the control group. MG extract increased Atg3 transcription by 0.16fold, Atg5 gene 0.2fold and Rıpk1 0.4fold compared to the control and in healthy HDF cells (Fig. 4). While MG extract directed cancer cells to autophagy and necrosis, it did not affect healthy cells.
Figure 5 shows the effect of MG extract on the mRNA expression of DNA repair genes in the A549 cell line and MCF7 cell lines and in healthy HDF cells after 48 h. No significant increase was observed in the mRNA transcription levels of Parp1 and P53 genes in the A549 cell line compared to the control group (p < 0.05). At the same time there was a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the mRNA transcription levels of Parp1 and P53 genes in the MCF7 cell lines compared to the control group. An approximately 26fold increase in the transcription level of p53 protein and a 15fold increase in the level of Parp genes in MCF 7 cell lines were observed. But this in healthy HDF cells, MG extract increased the Parp gene by 3.80 times and the P53 gene by 1.6 times compared to the control (Fig. 5).
After 48 h of administering the extract, a statistically significant increase (p < 0.05) was observed in the mRNA transcription levels of Bcl2, Bax, Apaf-1, Caspase-8, And Caspase-9 genes in the MCF7 cell line, as indicated in Fig. 6. In comparison to untreated control cells, a significant increase in the expression levels of Caspase-8 (15-fold in A549 cells and 11-fold in MCF7 cells), and Caspase-9 (7-fold in A549 cells and 20-fold in MCF7 cells) (Fig. 6), and Bax (6-fold in A549 cells and 17-fold in MCF7 cells), Apaf-1 (5-fold in A549 cells and 10-fold in MCF7 cells), Caspase-7 (14-fold in MCF7 cells) (Fig. 7) was observed. However, only the mRNA levels of Apaf-1, Caspase-8, and Caspase-9 genes significantly increased (p < 0.05) compared to the control group in the A549 cell lines. After the application of MG extract, the Bcl2 gene increased 2.32 times in healthy HDF cells compared to the control, while Caspase9 increased at very low rates, such as 0.16 times, Caspase3 0.06 times, and Caspase8, 1.17 times (Fig. 6). After the application of MG extract, the expression levels of Bax gene increased only 0.75 times, Caspase 7 only 0.03 times and Apaf1 only 0.13 times compared to the control in HDF cells (Fig. 7).
Discussion
This is the first study in which phenolic substances and antioxidant capacity of Mespilus germanica leaf extracts were determined, and their effects on essential genes involved in cell death pathways were investigated in A549 and MCF7 cancerous cell lines and in HDF (Human dermal fibroblasts:Pcs-201-012, ATTC) healthy cell line.
In this study, the total phenolic content of MG leaves was measured as 420.31 ± 6.71 mg GAE/ml, and the DPPH value was determined as 55 ± 9.45%. Previous studies determined the total phenolic content in medlar fruits between 93 and 170 mg GAE/ml in five ripening periods [10]. Consistent with our research, it has been reported that leaves contain higher levels of phenolic substances and antioxidant capacity than fruits [25]. In previous studies it was reported that the leaf extract of Mespilus germanica naturally contains antioxidants, phenolic acids, flavonoids, fatty acids, and tannins [26, 27]. These rich phytochemicals indicate that Mespilus germanica leaves have antioxidant capabilities, which align with our discovery of a DPPH value of 55 ± 9.45% and a total phenolic content of 420.31 ± 6.71 mg GAE/ml.
Characterizing ingredients from plant extracts has always been extremely important for alternative medicinal uses. In this study, it has been suggested that a significant number of phenolic compounds, such as genistein, caffeic acid, 3,4-hydroxycinnamic acid, luteolin, protocatechuic acid, quercetin, vitamin C, kaempferol, and naringenin, were identified by LCMS in MG extract. These compounds have been reported to play an essential role in fighting cancer by affecting signaling pathways and triggering cell death. Genistein has documented anti-tumor effects by affecting signaling pathways like Ptk, Erk1/2, NF κB, PI3K/Akt, Mapk, and Bax [28]. Thiliroside displays cancer properties against leukemia, lung, and breast cancer cells [29,30,31]. Caffeic acid plays a role in encouraging cell death and reducing cell growth through caspase activation [32]. Hydroxycinnamic acid derivates, which includes compounds like ferrulic acid shield against DNA damage and boost proteins linked to cell death in thyroid cancer cells [33, 34]. Quercetin, luteolin, protocatechuic acid, and naringenin are reported to induce apoptosis and inhibit metastasis in several cancers by modulating apoptosis-related pathways and targeting key oncogenes [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Similarly, kaempferol is potentially therapeutic against hormonally based, such as breast, ovarian, cervical, and ovarian cancers [44, 45]. We think that MG extract, which contains many phenolic substances with proven anti-cancer effects in previous studies, changes the levels of apoptotic, necrotic, and autophagic key genes by showing a synergistic cytotoxic effect on A549 and MCF7 cancer cell lines.
In this study, the dose-response relationship of the plant extract on cancer cell lines was examined; the findings showed that the 100 µg/ml dose had a proliferative effect, promoting the proliferation of cancer cells. The difference between the proliferative dose and IC50 suggests that the plant extract may support cancer cells’ growth at low concentrations but may exhibit toxic effects at higher concentrations, killing cancer cells. This information provides an in-depth understanding of the extract’s proliferative and antiproliferative properties and potentially indicates its uses as a bidirectional therapeutic agent. Such findings are thought to effectively define the dose range by improving dosage recommendations for future drug researches. In cell lines MCF 7 and A549, the IC50 values were 770 µg/ml and 800 µg/ml, respectively. Consisting with our study, Stankovic et al. [16] reported that Mespilus germanica (Rosaceae) extract had a cytotoxic effect against HeLa cancer cell lines with an IC50 value of approximately 625 ug/mL and Crataegus monogyna Jacq. (Rosaceae) extract had a cytotoxic effect with an IC50 value of 652 ug/mL [16]. As seen in the study conducted with Rosaceae family plants [16], the IC50 value we determined in our research depends on the phytochemical and genetic structure of Mespilus germanica. Likewise, we think that the high IC50 value depends on the genetic structure of the A549 and MCF7 cell lines and their resistance to the plant extract.
In addition, the IC50 dose of MG extract effective against A549 and MCF7 cancer cells did not significantly affect apoptotic, necrotic, and autophagic gene regulation in healthy fibroblast cells compared to the control. This significant result suggests that MG extract is an active ingredient that can potentially be a chemotherapy drug, killing cancer cells without harming healthy cells. Further in vivo and in vitro studies of MG extract in different cancers are planned.
MG extract significantly showed cytotoxic effects and affected the transcription levels of apoptotic, necrotic, autophagic, and DNA repair genes in A549 and MCF7 cell lines. Atg3 and Atg5 [46] are essential genes that play crucial roles in autophagy and Rıpk1 in necrosis [47]. Rıpk1 transcription level has decreased in cancerous tissues [48]. MG extract increased Atg3 in healthy fibroblast cells by 0.16 times, Atg5 by 0.24 times, and Rıpk1 by 0.41 times compared to the control. These findings indicate that MG extract can induce necrosis and autophagy by increasing the transcription levels of Atg3, Atg5, and Rıpk1 genes in MCF7 and A549 cell lines but does not damage healthy fibroblast cells. Although all three genes increased significantly in healthy HDF cells compared to the control, this increase is relatively insignificant compared to the increase in A549 and MCF7 cells. While MG extract directed cancer cells to autophagy and necrosis, it did not affect healthy cells. Consistent with our study, Nelson et al. [49] reported that Eclipta alba extract exhibited major cytotoxicity on colon cancer cells while demonstrating much lower toxicity towards normal lung fibroblast cells [49]. This indicates that the plant extract explicitly hinders the growth of cancer cells while having minimal harmful effects on normal cells, which is essential for reducing side effects in possible cancer treatments.
As a vital transcription factor, p53 regulates the transcriptional activity of specific genes and responds to DNA damage by inducing cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. The presence of p53 in the cytoplasm at elevated concentrations results in a significant inhibitory impact on Caspase-9. The regulation of target gene expression by p53 in response to cellular stress and DNA damage aligns with its recognized function as the guardian of the genome [50, 51]. As a result, one of the cancer treatment methods could be to activate p53 in cancer cells. In this study, an approximately 26-fold increase in the transcription level of p53 protein was detected in MCF7 cancer cell lines applied with MG extract compared to the control group. Consisitent with our study, Zhang and Huang [52] reported that the plant extract of Astragalus membranaceus inhibits the proliferation of endometrial cancer cells by activating the P53/P21 signaling pathway [52]. In another study by Juniperus communis L. was found to induce cell death and sensitize cancer cells to cytostatic drugs through the P53 and P13K/Akt pathways [53]. This findings support the notion that plant extracts can modulate P53 activity in cancer cells, potentially inhibiting cell proliferation and promoting apoptosis.
Parps are a family of nuclear enzymes that are effective in DNA repair and involved in necrosis and apoptosis. The extract applied in this study increased the transcription levels of Parp genes approximately 15-fold in MCF 7 cell lines. MG extract increased the levels of Parp1 and P53 genes by approximately 13 and 27-fold, respectively, in MCF7 cells and approximately four and 3-fold, respectively, compared to the control in healthy fibroblast cells. This shows that MG extract activates the Parp1 and P53 genes to repair damaged DNA in cancer cells and induces these genes in less effective amounts in healthy cells to protect the healthy cells.
The Bax protein, a member of the Bcl-2 family, is situated within the cytosol and is responsible for triggering apoptosis through the augmentation of apoptosis-inducing factor and cytochrome-c release. The inhibition of apoptosis occurs by preventing the release of cytochrome-c and apoptosis-inducing substances by precursor forms of caspases [54]. Both Caspase 9, a mitochondrial pathway protein, and Caspase 8, a receptor pathway protein, were triggered, increasing the expression of Caspase 7. The increase in Caspase 7 induced apoptosis. Consistent with our study, it has been reported that Cararia draba leaf extracts have shown significant cytotoxicity against cancer cell lines, particularly HepG2, with observed changes in Caspase 9 gene expression [55]. Similarly, extracts from Anastatica hierochuntica have been found to induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells by upregulating genes related to apoptosis [56]. Additionally, research on Ephedra major and Momordica charantia extracts revealed their influence on cell viability in breast cancer cells through increased cytotoxicity and Caspase 3 gene expression [57]. Consistent with the above mentioned publications MG extract was effective inducing important genes in cell death pathways.
In this study, we observed that the MG extract induces cancer cell death by activating apoptotic, autophagic, and necrotic pathways, a phenomenon corroborated by previous research. Mahassni and Al-Reemi [58] reported that an aqueous extract from garden cress seeds induced apoptosis and necrosis in human breast cancer cells [58]. The researchers highlighted the capability of plant extracts to engage cell death pathways simultaneously. Research by Zhang et al. [59] delved into how chemotherapeutic agents induce pyroptosis in A549 lung cancer cells through caspase 3/Gsdme activation [59]. Pyroptosis, a form of programmed cell death, shares features with both apoptosis and necrosis, involving responses and cell lysis akin to necrosis but demonstrating apoptotic characteristics. In another study, Yu et al. [60] showed that arsenite combined with tetrandrine triggered cell death processes in human breast cancer cells, including apoptosis, necrosis, S phase arrest, and autophagy [60]. This study underscores how natural compounds from plants can concurrently influence diverse cell death pathways.
The findings obtained in this study showed that the phytochemicals present in Mespilus germanica leaves could simultaneously trigger multiple cell death mechanisms in A549 and MCF7 cancer cell lines. In particular, its effects on genes regulating apoptosis, necrosis, and autophagy pathways in these cell lines indicate the potential therapeutic benefits of MG extract. On the other hand, no significant change in the expression of these genes was observed in normal human skin fibroblast (HDF) cells, providing substantial evidence that the extract exerts a selective effect.
This selectivity highlights the importance of targeting cancer cells without harming healthy cells in cancer treatment. This feature of MG extract can potentially reduce side effects in cancer treatment. However, further studies are needed to confirm the clinical significance of these results and the impact of MG extract on rats and humans. Future studies should further examine the effectiveness of this extract against different types of cancer, its dose-response relationship, and its role in the treatment process. These studies should also evaluate the extract’s long-term effects and possible toxicity on healthy cells to establish a solid basis for the safe and effective use of this natural product in cancer treatment.
Conclusion
With this study, we report for the first time that, while MG extract kills A549 and MCF7 cancer cells, it does not affect HDFa cells (Human Dermal Fibroblasts). This significant result suggests that MG extract selectively inhibits cancer cell growth without causing significant toxicity to normal cells, which is crucial to minimizing side effects in potential cancer treatments. It is thought that such a result was achieved due to the antioxidant properties of Mespilus germanica leaf extract and the variety of phenolic acids it contains.
Findings of this study are limited to in vitro conditions; therefore, extrapolation to in vivo contexts, including studies with rats and humans, is being considered to confirm these effects and explore clinical applications. Further studies are planned to examine the effects of MG extract on protein level cahanges and their impact on cellular mechanisms. Also studies involving a more detailed biochemical analysis are intended to identify the specific bioactive components within the MG extract. This study we have completed, and the studies we plan to do in the future will contribute to the design of medicinal-plant based cancer drugs with fewer side effects.
Abbreviations
- APAF-1 :
-
Apoptosis Protease Activating Factor-1
- ATG3 :
-
autophagy related 3
- ATG5 :
-
autophagy related 5
- BAX :
-
BCL -2-Associated X Protein
- BCL-2 :
-
B-cell lymphoma 2
- CASPASE :
-
Cysteine Aspartate Specific ProteASEs-CASPASE
- C DNA :
-
Complementary DNA
- DNA :
-
Deoksiribonucleic acid
- DMSO :
-
Dimethyl sulfoxide
- ER :
-
Endoplasmic Reticulum
- FADD :
-
Fas-Associated Protein with Death
- HDFa :
-
Human Dermal Fibroblasts, adult
- IAP :
-
Inhibitors of Apoptosis Proteins
- IC50 :
-
The half maximal inhibitory concentration
- MTT :
-
(3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide)
- NF-κB :
-
Nuclear Factor Kappa Beta Pathway
- PARP :
-
Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase
- PCR :
-
Polimer Chain reaction
- RIPK 1 :
-
receptor interacting serine/threonine kinase 1
- ROS :
-
Reactive Oxygen Species
- TNF :
-
Tumor Necrosis Factor
- TP53 :
-
tumor protein p53
References
World Health Organization (2020) WHO report on cancer: setting priorities, investing wisely and providing care for all https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240001299.
Lukong, K. E. (2017). Understanding breast cancer–The long and winding road. BBA Clinical, 7, 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbacli.2017.01.001.
Greenwell, M., & Rahman, P. K. S. M. (2015). Medicinal plants: their use in anticancer treatment. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 6(10), 4103. https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.6(10).4103-12.
Seca, A. M., & Pinto, D. C. (2018). Plant secondary metabolites as anticancer agents: successes in clinical trials and therapeutic application. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(1), 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010263.
Trabelsi, N., Falleh, H., Jallali, I., Daly, A. B., Hajlaoui, H., Smaoui, A., & Ksouri, R. (2012). Variation of phenolic composition and biological activities in Limoniastrum monopetalum L. organs. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 34(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0807-8.
Ranjan, A., Ramachandran, S., Gupta, N., Kaushik, I., Wright, S., Das, H., Srivastava, S., Prasad, S., & Srivastava, S. K. (2019). Role of Phytochemicals in Cancer Prevention. International Journal of Molecular Science, 20(20), 4981. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20204981.
Rezaie-Tavirani, M., Fayazfar, S., Heydari-Keshel, S., Rezaee, M. B., Zamanian-Azodi, M., Rezaei-Tavirani, M., & Khodarahmi, R. (2013). Effect of essential oil of Rosa Damascena on human colon cancer cell line SW742. Gastroenterology Hepatology from Bed to Bench, 6(1), 25–31.
Gharaghani, A., Solhjoo, S., & Oraguzie, N. (2016). A review of genetic resources of pome fruits in Iran. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 63(1), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0334-3.
Shulaev, V., Korban, S. S., Sosinski, B., Abbott, A. G., Aldwinckle, H. S., Folta, K. M., & Lewers, K. (2008). Multiple models for Rosaceae genomics. Plant Physiology, 147(3), 985–1003. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.115618.
Rop, O., Sochor, J., Jurikova, T., Zitka, O., Skutkova, H., Mlcek, J., & Kramarova, D. (2011). Effect of five different stages of ripening on chemical compounds in medlar (Mespilus germanica L.). Molecules, 16(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16010074.
Cevahir, G., & Bostan, S. Z. (2021). Organic acids, sugars and bioactive compounds of promising medlar (Mespilus Germanica L.) genotypes selected from Turkey. International Journal of Fruit Science, 21(1), 312–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2021.1874594.
Glew, R. H., Ayaz, F. A., Sanz, C., VanderJagt, D. J., Huang, H. S., Chuang, L. T., & Strnad, M. (2003). Changes in sugars, organic acids and amino acids in medlar (Mespilus germanica L.) during fruit development and maturation. Food Chemistry, 83(3), 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00097-9.
Baytop, T. (1999). Therapy with medicinal plants in Turkey (past and present). 2nd ed. Capa-Istanbul: Nobel Tıp Press.
Shafiee, F., Khoshvishkaie, E., Davoodi, A., Dashti Kalantar, A., Bakhshi Jouybari, H., & Ataee, R. (2018). The determination of blood glucose lowering and metabolic effects of Mespilus germanica L. hydroacetonic extract on streptozocin-induced diabetic Balb/c mice. Medicines, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines5010001.
Yunusa, U. M., & Ozturk Urek, R. (2023) Phenolic composition, antioxidant, and cytotoxic effects on HeLa and HepG2 cancer cell lines of Mespilus germanica grown in Turkey. Natural Product Research, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2023.2230612.
Stanković Katanić, J. S., Mićanović, N., Grozdanić, N., Kostić, A. Ž., Gašić, U., Stanojković, T., & Popović-Djordjević, J. B. (2022). Polyphenolic profile, antioxidant and antidiabetic potential of medlar (Mespilus germanica L.), blackthorn (Prunus spinosa L.) and common hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna Jacq.)fruitextractsfromSerbia. Horticulturae, 8(11), 1053. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8111053.
Dalar, A., Türker, M., & Konczak, I. (2012). Antioxidant capacity and phenolic constituents of Malva neglecta Wallr. and Plantago lanceolata L. from Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. Journal of Herbal Medicine, 2(2), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2012.03.001.
Pyo, Y. H., Lee, T. C., Logendra, L., & Rosen, R. T. (2004). Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of swiss chard (Beta vulgaris subspecies cycla) extracts. Food Chemistry, 85, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00294-2.
Singleton, V. L., & Rossi, J. A. (1965). Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphotungustic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 16, 144–158. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144.
Meerloo, J. V., Kaspers, G. J. L., & Cloos, J. (2011). Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 237 (pp. 731). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-080-5_20.
Hazman, Ö., Sarıova, A., Bozkurt, M. F., & Ciğerci, İ. H (2021). The anticarcinogen activity of β-arbutin on MCF-7 cells: Stimulation of apoptosis through estrogen receptor-α signal pathway, inflammation and genotoxicity. Molecular Cellular Biochemistry 476, 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-020-03911-7.
Chomczynski, P., & Mackey, K. (1995). Substitution of Chloroform by Bromochloropropane in the Single-Step Method of RNA Isolation. Analytical Biochemistry 225, 163–164. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1995.1126.
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001). Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods, 25, 402–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262.
Nowacka, N., Nowak, R., Drozd, M., Olech, M., Los, R., & Malm, A. (2014). Analysis of phenolic constituents, antiradical and antimicrobial activity of edible mushrooms growing wild in Poland. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 59(2), 689–694.
Teleszko, M., & Wojdylo, A. (2015). Comparison of phenolic compounds and antioxidant potential between selected edible fruits and their leaves. Journal of Functional Foods, 14, 736–746.
Safari, M., & Ahmady‐Asbchin, S. (2019). Evaluation of antioxidant and antibacterial activities of methanolic extract of medlar (mespilus germanica l.) leaves. Biotechnology, 33(1), 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2019.1577701.
Rashidi, M., Islami, M. R., & Tahmassebi, D. (2020). Affordable and environmentally friendly method for the synthesis of a green silver nanophotocatalyst based on mespilus germanica. SN Applied Sciences, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2471-3.
Sharma, E., Attri, D. C., Sati, P., Dhyani, P., Szopa, A., Sharifi-Rad, J., … & Cho, W. C. (2022) Recent updates on anticancer mechanisms of polyphenols. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.1005910.
Qin, N., Li, C. B., Jin, M.-N., Shi, L.-H., Duan, H.-Q., & Niu, W.-Y. (2011). Synthesis and biological activity of novel tiliroside derivants. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 46(10), 5189–5195.
Liao, C.-R., Kuo, Y.-H., & Ho, Y.-L. et al. (2014). Studies on cytotoxic constituents from the leaves of Elaeagnus oldhamii Maxim. in non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells. Molecules, 19(7), 9515–9534.
Da’i, M., Wikantyasning, E. R., Wahyuniet, A. S., Kusumawati, I., Saifudin, A., & Suhendi, A. (2016). Antiproliferative properties of tiliroside from Guazuma ulmifolia lamk on T47D and MCF7 cancer cell lines. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 6(6), 627–633.
Ceramella, J., Loizzo, M. R., Iacopetta, D., Bonesi, M., Sicari, V., Pellicano, T. M., Saturnino, C., Malzert-Freon, A., Tundis, R., & Sinicropi, M. S. (2019). Anchusa azurea Mill. (Boraginaceae) aerial parts methanol extract interfering with cytoskeleton organization induces programmed cancer cells death. Food and Function, 10, 4280–4290. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9FO00582J.
Sevgi, K., Tepe, B., & Sarikurkcu, C. (2015). Antioxidant and DNA damage protection potentials of selected phenolic acids. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 77, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2014.12.006.
Dodurga, Y., Eroglu, C., Secme, M., Elmas, L., Avci, C. B., & Satiroglu-Tufan, N. L. (2016). Anti-proliferative and anti-invasive effects of ferulic acid in TT medullary thyroid cancer cells interacting with URG4/URGCP. Tumour Biology, 37, 1933–1940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-3984-z.
Guo, M., Zeng, J., Sun, Z., Wu, X., & Hu, Z. (2023). Research progress on quercetin’s biological activity and structural modification based on its antitumor effects. ChemistrySelect, 8(41). https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202303167.
Li, X., Zhou, N., Wang, J., Liu, Z., Wang, X., & Zhang, Q., et al. (2018). Quercetin suppresses breast cancer stem cells (CD44+/CD24−) by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt/ mTOR-signaling pathway. Life Science, 196, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2018.01.014.
Yang, M.-Y., Wang, C.-J., Chen, N.-F., Ho, W.-H., Lu, F.-J., & Tseng, T.-H. (2014). Luteolin enhances paclitaxel-induced apoptosis in human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells by blocking STAT3. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 213, 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2014.02.002.
Pandurangan, A. K., Dharmalingam, P., Sadagopan, S. K. A., & Ganapasam, S. (2014). Luteolin inhibits matrix metalloproteinase 9 and 2 in azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis. Human and Experimental Toxicology, 33, 1176–1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327114522502.
Pu, Y., Zhang, T., Wang, J., Mao, Z., Duan, B., & Long, Y., et al. (2018). Luteolin exerts an anticancer effect on gastric cancer cells through multiple signalling pathways and regulating miRNAs. Journal of Cancer, 9, 3669–3675. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.27183.
Yin, M.-C., Lin, C.-C., Wu, H.-C., Tsao, S.-M., & Hsu, C.-K. (2009). Apoptotic effects of protocatechuic acid in human breast, lung, liver, cervix, and prostate cancer cells: Potential mechanisms of action. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57, 6468–6473. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9004466.
Lin, H.-H., Chen, J.-H., Chou, F.-P., & Wang, C.-J. (2011). Protocatechuic acid inhibits cancer cell metastasis involving the down-regulation of Ras/Akt/NF-κB pathway and MMP-2 production by targeting RhoB activation. British Journal of Pharmacology, 162, 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01022.x.
Patel, K., Singh, G. K., & Patel, D. K. (2018). A review on pharmacological and analytical aspects of naringenin. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 24, 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-014-1960-x.
Bao, L., Liu, F., Guo, H. B., Li, Y., Tan, B. B., Zhang, W. X., & Peng, Y. H. (2016). Naringenin inhibits proliferation, migration, and invasion as well as induces apoptosis of gastric cancer sgc7901 cell line by downregulation of akt pathway. Tumor Biology, 37, 11365–11374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-5013-2.
Kim, S. H., & Choi, K. C. (2013). Anti-cancer effect and underlying mechanism(s) of kaempferol, a phytoestrogen, on the regulation of apoptosis in diverse cancer cell models. Toxicological Research, 29, 229–234. https://doi.org/10.5487/TR.2013.29.4.229.
Li, F., Zhao, C., & Wang, L. (2014). Molecular-targeted agents combination therapy for cancer: developments and potentials. International Journal of Cancer, 134(6), 1257–1269. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28261.
Ye, X., Zhou, X., & Zhang, H. (2018). Exploring the role of autophagy-related gene 5 (atg5) yields important insights into autophagy in autoimmune/autoinflammatory diseases. Frontiers in Immunology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02334.
Kaczmarek, A., Vandenabeele, P., & Krysko, D. V. (2013). Necroptosis: The Release of Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns and Its Physiological Relevance. Immunity, 38, 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2013.02.003.
Moriwaki, K., Bertin, J., Gough, P. J., Orlowski, G. M., & Chan, F. K. (2015). Differential roles of RIPK1 and RIPK3 in TNF-induced necroptosis and chemotherapeutic agent-induced cell death. Cell Death & Disease, 6(2), e1636. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2015.16.
Nelson, V. K., Sahoo, N. K., & Sahu, M., et al. (2020). In vitro anticancer activity of Eclipta alba whole plant extract on colon cancer cell HCT-116. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 20, 355. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-03118-9.
Chee, J. L., Saidin, S., Lane, D. P., Leong, S. M., Noll, J. E., Neilsen, P. M., & Lim, T. M. (2013). Wild-type and mutant p53 mediate cisplatin resistance through interaction and inhibition of active caspase-9. Cell Cycle, 12(2), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.23054.
Mantovani, F., Collavin, L., & Del Sal, G. (2019). Mutant p53 as a guardian of the cancer cell. Cell Death & Differentiation, 26(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-018-0246-9.
Zhang, Q., & Huang, X. (2021). The modulatory properties of Astragalus membranaceus treatment on endometrial cancer: an integrated pharmacological method. PeerJ, 9, e11995. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11995.
Raasmaja, A., Stenius, U., & Ghalali, A. (2019). The water extract of juniperus communis l. induces cell death and sensitizes cancer cells to cytostatic drugs through p53 and pi3k/akt pathways. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(9), 2054. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092054.
Spierings, D. C., de Vries, E. G., & Vellenga, E., et al. (2004). Tissue distribution of the death ligand Trail and its receptors. J Histochem Cytochem, 52(6), 821–831. https://doi.org/10.1369/jhc.3A6112.2004.
Albarazanchi, S., Ali, F., & Al-Shanon, A. (2018). Cytotoxic activity of cardia draba leaves extracted on some cancer cell line. Iraqi Journal for Biotechnology Research, 12(2), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.24126/jobrc.2018.12.2.532.
Rameshbabu, S., Messaoudi, S., Alehaideb, Z., Ali, M., Venktraman, A., Alajmi, H., & Matou‐Nasri, S. (2020). Anastatica hierochuntica (l.) methanolic and aqueous extracts exert antiproliferative effects through the induction of apoptosis in mcf-7 breast cancer cells. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 28(8), 985–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2020.06.020.
Sabbagh, S. K., Ghodrati, E., Hajibeiki, A., Mazaheri, M., Ardakani, M. R. S., & Ardakani, Z. S. (2021). Effect of hydroalcoholic extract of ephedra major, momordica charantia, and resveratrol on cytotoxicity and caspase-3 genes expression level in mcf-7 breast cancer cell line. Gene, Cell and Tissue, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.5812/gct.110658.
Mahassni, S. H., & Al-Reemi, R. M. (2013). Apoptosis and necrosis of human breast cancer cells by an aqueous extract of garden cress (lepidium sativum) seeds. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 20(2), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.12.002.
Zhang, C., Li, C., Wang, Y., Xu, L., He, X., Zeng, Q., & Ouyang, D. (2019). Chemotherapeutic paclitaxel and cisplatin differentially induce pyroptosis in a549 lung cancer cells via caspase-3/gsdme activation. Apoptosis, 24(3-4), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-019-01515-1.
Yu, B., Yuan, B., Li, J., Kiyomi, A., Kikuchi, H., Hayashi, H., … & Takagi, N. (2020). Jnk and autophagy independently contributed to cytotoxicity of arsenite combined with tetrandrine via modulating cell cycle progression in human breast cancer cells. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.01087rr.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit. Project number : TYD-2021-9330. The laboratory studies were carried out at Van Yuzuncu Yil University Science and Research Application Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
G.G. (Gül Görmez) : Data curation, Project administration, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. V.Y. (Veysel Yüksek): Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. A.U. (Ayşe Usta): Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. S.D. (Semiha Dede): Writing – review & editing. S.G. (Selçuk Gümüş): Writing – review & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Görmez, G., Yüksek, V., Usta, A. et al. Phenolic Contents, Antioxidant Activities, LCMS Profiles of Mespilus germanica Leaf Extract and Effects on mRNA Transcription Levels of Apoptotic, Autophagic, and Necrotic Genes in MCF7 and A549 Cancer Cell Lines. Cell Biochem Biophys (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-024-01321-w
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-024-01321-w