Abstract
The toxic effects of the amorphous silica nanoparticles have not been thoroughly studied. Moreover, the majority of the in vivo investigations were performed using an inhalation exposure method. The current study aimed to explore the potential toxic effects of silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) after the treatment of adult male rats with two different concentrations (500 and 1000 ppm) via drinking water for 28 days. The genotoxicity, antioxidant status, and liver and kidney functions were assessed. Besides, histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluations were performed. The results showed a significant elevation in the malondialdehyde (MDA) level concurrent with a reduction in total reduced glutathione (GSH) concentration and catalase activity in the 1000-ppm SiNP-exposed rats as well as increase in ALT and AST activity confirmed by various histopathological alterations detected in liver. Also, in the 1000-ppm SiNP-exposed animals, there was an elevation in urea and creatinine levels confirmed by histopathological alterations detected in kidneys. Immunohistochemical findings in both liver and kidneys indicated strong expression of caspase-3 in the 1000-ppm SiNP-treated rats compared with the control and 500-ppm SiNP-treated groups. Such findings indicated that the 1000-ppm SiNPs exerted severe hepato-renal toxic impacts when compared with the control and 500-ppm SiNP-exposed rats.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Nanoparticles have been extensively used in various fields, and the toxic effects on the environment and humans are attracting increasing attention. Amorphous silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) are one of the most common nanoparticles and because of their physicochemical properties; they are applied increasingly in agriculture, industrial manufacturing, construction, microelectronics, cosmetics, consumer products, and foodstuffs [1,2,3]. Due to their high hydrophilicity and good biocompatibility, SiNPs are developed for many biomedical and pharmaceutical applications such as drug delivery and cancer therapy, imaging probes, biosensors, and enzyme immobilization [4, 5].
Nowadays, the industrial production of SiNPs has resulted in an increased risk of human exposures at workplaces [6]. Also, SiNPs could be intentionally used for disease diagnosis and treatments [7]. As human exposure to the SiNPs is increasing, the assessment of the toxicity of these nanomaterials is urgently needed [8]. Nanosilica might lead to multiple organ damage [9]. As previously reported, SiNP exposure leads to oxidative damage and inflammatory response followed by cell membrane damage, genotoxic effect, mitochondrial dysfunction, cell cycle arrest, necrosis, and apoptosis [10, 11].
Inhalation of nanosilica produces lung inflammation, heart damage, and elevation in fibrinogen concentration and blood viscosity [12]. Nanosilica exposure also results in hydroxyl radical production [13] and hepatic injury [14, 15]. A wide range of toxic mechanisms have been reported including DNA damage and cellular nucleoplasmic protein aggregates [16], metabonomics [17], oxidative stress, and apoptosis [18, 19].
However, in vivo toxicity of SiNPs has been studied far less than in vitro toxicity [4]. Besides, there are little data about the adverse effects of SiNPs after oral administration. Thus, the present study was conducted to evaluate the toxic potential of two concentrations of SiNP in adult male rats through assessment of the liver and kidney function, genotoxic effect, and histopathological and immunohistochemical changes as well as appraising the antioxidant status following exposure to SiNPs.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals
SiNPs were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. They were spherical and porous in shape, with a size of 20–30 nm and a purity of 99.5%. Kits for the biochemical analysis were purchased from the Biodiagnostic Company (Dokki, Giza, Egypt).
Suspension Preparation of SiNPs
Solutions of SiNPs were prepared by sonication according to the method of Canesi et al. [20] using Sonics Vibra-Cell sonicator (Newtown, Connecticut, USA). Before the experiment, the solutions were sonicated in an ice bath for 15 min at 100 W, 50% on/off cycle.
Animal Grouping and Experimental Design
Thirty adult male Sprague Dawley rats at 8 weeks and 180–200 g were obtained from the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine-University of Sadat City, Egypt. Rats had ad libitum access to basal ration and tap water. All rats were acclimatized for 2 weeks before the beginning of the experiment. Animal handling and treatment procedures were conducted according to the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and approved by the research ethics committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University (VetCU1022019079). For the experiments, rats were randomly distributed into three equal groups (n = 10/group). Rats in group I (Control) received distilled water, group II received 500 ppm SiNPs in drinking water, and group III received 1000 ppm SiNPs in drinking water for 28 days. SiNP concentrations were selected according to Sadek et al. [21].
Blood and Tissue Sampling
At the end of the study, the blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital venous plexus of control and treated rats, where it was divided into 2 parts. The first part was allowed to clot at room temperature, then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min for separation of serum which was stored at − 20 °C for biochemical analysis, while the other part was collected in heparinized tubes and immediately used for micronucleus assessment. The liver and kidney were homogenized in ice-cold 100-mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The homogenates were centrifuged at 14,000×g for 20 min, and the resulting supernatant was kept at −20 °C for antioxidant parameters assessment. At necropsy, the liver and kidney were removed, washed with physiological saline, and weighed. Small portions of them were collected and fixed in 10% buffered neutral formalin solution for histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations.
Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity Biomarkers
-
1.
Micronucleus assay
Drops of whole blood were directly smeared on slides. The slides were air-dried for 24 h, fixed in methanol for 10 min, followed by 10% Giemsa staining. To detect micronuclei in erythrocytes, the slides were analyzed using a 1000-oil-immersion lens. The mean frequency of micronuclei was evaluated per 1000 cells per group of rats [22].
-
2.
Oxidative stress evaluation
The malondialdehyde was determined in homogenates by monitoring the thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) formation using colorimetric kits as described by Ohkawa et al. [23]. GSH was determined by the colorimetric method as mentioned by Beutler et al. [24]. The CAT activity was determined according to the method of Fossati et al. [25].
Biochemical Evaluation
The impact of SiNPs on liver function was evaluated by measuring the activities of serum alanine aminotransferase “ALT” and aspartate aminotransferase “AST” [26]. Kidney function was evaluated by measuring serum levels of BUN [27] and creatinine [28].
Histopathological Examination and Lesion Scoring
Samples from liver and kidneys were collected from different experimental groups, fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and routinely processed. The paraffin-embedded blocks were sectioned at 5 μm thickness and stained with hematoxylin and eosin [29]. Histopathological alterations in liver and kidneys were evaluated and scored as (0) indicated no changes, (1), (2). and (3) indicated mild, moderate, and severe changes, respectively, while the grading was determined by percentage as follows: (< 30%) showed mild changes, (< 30–50%) indicated moderate changes, and changes more than 50% indicated severe changes [30, 31].
Immunohistochemistry
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded 4-μm sections were fixed into poly-L-lysine coated slides (Thermo-Scientific, Karlsruhe, Germany). After deparaffinization and rehydration, the slides were immersed in buffer Target Retrieval Solution, pH 9.0 (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Peroxidase Blocking Solution (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) was used to block the activity of endogenous peroxidase. The slides were incubated with 1 mg/ml of caspase-3 antibodies at 1:50 dilution (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) and immunostained with DAKO RealTM EnvisionTM Detection System Peroxidase/DAB+, HRP Rabbit/Mouse (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). The positive immune reactive cells showed a brown-stained cytoplasm. The color intensity and percentage area of brown color staining were estimated by color deconvolution image J software 1.52 p software (Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health (USA).
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis was carried out by one-way ANOVA with setting the probability level to p ≤ 0.05; post hoc analysis of group differences was performed by LSD test. The treated groups were compared both with each other and with the untreated control group. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM.
Results
Micronucleus Assay
AS displayed in Fig. 1, no significant difference in the frequency of micronucleated erythrocytes was observed between the 500 ppm SiNPs and control groups. However, MN frequencies were significantly higher in the 1000-ppm SiNP-exposed group than the control and 500-ppm SiNP-treated group (p ≤ 0.05).
Effect of SiNPs on Oxidant/Antioxidant Markers
The changes in oxidant/antioxidant markers are shown in Table 1. The levels of MDA were significantly elevated, while the activity of catalase and the level of GSH were significantly reduced in both liver and kidney of animals of the high-dose SiNP group.
Liver and Kidney Functions
Data presented in Table 2 indicate that the high SiNP concentration caused a significant increase (p < 0.05) in AST and ALT activities compared with control rats. Additionally, there were statistically significant increases in BUN and creatinine concentrations in rats treated with 1000 ppm silica nanoparticles indicating kidney dysfunction.
Histopathological Findings and Lesion Scoring
All the recorded lesions in the liver and kidneys were scored according to their severity as shown in Table 3. The control group showed normal histological structure of the liver (Fig. 2a and b). Concerning the group that was treated with 500 ppm SiNPs, it revealed mild vacuolar degeneration in some hepatocytes with a mild proliferation of kupffer cells (Fig. 2c and d). There was also mild congestion of hepatic sinusoids (Fig. 2e). Portal areas showed congestion of portal blood vessels and hyperplasia of bile duct lining epithelium (Fig. 2f). Concerning group treated with 1000 ppm SiNPs, it showed severe vacuolar degeneration of a considerable number of hepatocytes and focal coagulative necrosis of some hepatocytes. Hepatic sinusoids showed mild congestion (Fig. 3a, b, and c) with moderate proliferation of kupffer cells. Mild portal fibrosis was noticed with hyperplasia of bile duct lining epithelium.
The kidneys of the control group showed normal histological structure (Fig. 4a). Kidneys of the group treated with 500 ppm SiNPs showed congestion of glomerular tuft with vacuolation of some glomerular lining endothelium. Few renal tubules showed mild cystic dilatation (Fig. 4b and c). There was also congestion of interstitial blood vessels. Interstitial tissue revealed infiltration of mononuclear inflammatory cells (Fig. 4d). In the group that treated with 1000 ppm SiNPs, glomerular tuft revealed congestion and atrophy; also, it showed vacuolation of glomerular lining endothelium and hypercellularity. Some renal corpuscles revealed necrosis of glomerular tuft; there was also coagulative necrosis of a considerable number of renal tubular lining epithelium (Fig. 4e). Interstitial tissue revealed congestion of its blood vessels. Renal cortical interstitial tissue also showed infiltration of mononuclear inflammatory cells (Fig. 4f), with cystic dilatation of some renal tubules.
Immunohistochemistry
Caspase-3 Expression
Immunostaining expression of caspase-3% area in the liver and kidneys of different groups was illustrated in Fig. 5. No caspase 3 immune-reactive cells in the liver and kidneys of control rats were observed (Fig. 6a). Sections from 500-ppm SiNP-treated group revealed weak caspase-3 expression in both liver and kidney (Fig. 6b). On the other hand, the 1000-ppm SiNP-exposed group showed strong positive immune-reactive cells in both organs (Fig. 6c).
Discussion
The small size of nanoparticles (NPs) was found to increase their surface area, which increases their binding to serum proteins, and their surface receptor recognition, leading to more tissue damage [32]. Because the growing production and use of SiNPs increase the risk of human exposures, an evaluation of their safety is extremely important [8, 33]. Some previous studies demonstrated the toxicity of silica nanoparticles on the liver and kidney of rats and mice, while other investigations reported that SiNPs have no adverse effects and can be used safely [34].
In the current study DNA damage was evaluated by the micronucleus assay. The micronucleated erythrocyte is an important marker of cellular toxicity of environmental pollutants, where the presence of micronucleus in cells is an indication of chromosomal aberrations and DNA break [35]. In our experiment, the 1000-ppm SiNP-exposed rats showed a significant elevation of micronucleus frequency as compared with that in 500 ppm SiNPs and control groups. Exposure to SiNPs resulted in DNA damage in human keratinocytes (HaCaT) [36]. Also, Exposure to nano-silica caused cell mortality and significant DNA break [37]. Nabeshi et al. [38] reported that the genotoxicity observed with nano-silica may be related to pro-inflammatory effects through ROS-mediated mechanism, modification of chromatin structure, or elevation of DNase, a potent inducer of cytogenetic damages.
Our oxidative stress findings showed that SiNPs dose at (1000 ppm) increased the MDA content, whereas it decreased the GSH level, and CAT enzyme activity significantly. Similar to our results, oxidative stress biomarkers were significantly increased, in the serum and brain of the SiNP-exposed mice and rats [39, 40]. Further studies reported that silica NPs caused induction of oxidative damage and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation [41, 36]. The liberation of ROS can be considered a possible mechanism for SiNP toxicity taking into consideration that silica has been shown to cause oxidative and inflammatory impacts resulting in the degradation of proteins and DNA break [42, 43]. The increase in lipid peroxidation end products could be attributed to oxidative damage of biological membranes by the generated ROS, which in turn contributes to the depletion of endogenous antioxidant enzymes and GSH amounts [44, 45]. Durairaj et al. [46] reported that the lowering of the CAT activity may result in deleterious effects due to the accumulation of superoxide radicals and hydrogen peroxide.
Previous studies have demonstrated that NPs induced toxicological effects in different organs mainly on the lungs, liver, spleen, and kidneys [47, 48]. In the current study, the activity of serum marker enzymes of the liver (ALT and AST) were markedly elevated in rats treated with 1000 ppm SiNPs. This finding indicates hepatic damage that alters hepatocytes membrane permeability causing leakage of enzymes from the cells. In consonance with the present finding, some investigators registered an elevation in the activity of serum AST and ALT activities following SiNP administration [49, 50]. Some studies have reported that the liver is a reticuloendothelial system organ and is recognized as a major SiNP target [51, 52], as SiNPs accumulate in the liver and induce pathological changes. Previous studies have demonstrated that SiNPs inflicted severe liver damage after systemic administration [49]. Oxidative stress in the hepatic tissue of mice was notably prevalent after exposure to nano-silica, resulting in hepatic injury [53, 54].
In our study, the histopathological findings in the liver of animals treated with 500 ppm SiNPs showed mild degenerative changes in some hepatocytes with mild congestion of blood vessels, while in the group that treated with 1000 ppm SiNPs, histopathological changes included severe vacuolar degeneration of hepatocytes and focal necrosis of some. Hepatic sinusoids showed mild congestion with moderate proliferation of Kupffer cells. These results are correlated with those of oxidative stress markers and liver function tests. In one study, the ALT and AST levels were increased in SiNP-treated rats, and small amounts of inflammatory cell infiltration and hepatic cell adipose degeneration in the liver were observed [55]. The hepatic vacuolation and karyolytic and pyknotic nuclei of some hepatocytes may be due to cell injury [32].
Furthermore, our data revealed significant elevations in serum creatinine and urea in the kidney of 1000-ppm SiNP-exposed rats. The increased BUN and creatinine levels reflect reduction of glomerular filtration rate [56]. Blood biochemical parameters such as albumin, cholesterol, triglycerides, total proteins, urea, and AST activities were significantly elevated in exposed mice and rats [21]. Herein, the recorded modulation in liver and kidney biochemical markers, reflecting liver and kidney injury, is in line with our histopathological and immunohistochemical findings.
Kidneys of the group treated with 500 ppm SiNPs showed mild degenerative and inflammatory reactions. In the group that treated with 1000 ppm SiNPs, glomerular tuft revealed congestion and atrophy, in addition to vacuolation of glomerular lining endothelium. Some renal corpuscles revealed necrosis of glomerular tuft. Interstitial tissue showed the infiltration of mononuclear inflammatory cells. There was coagulative necrosis of a considerable number of renal tubular lining epithelium. Hassankhani et al. [57] noticed gross tissue damage in the kidney of male mice (cell swelling and necrosis) after SiNP exposure. SiNPs were found to persist longer in liver and kidneys than any other organ [55, 58].
Immunostaining of caspase-3 protein in the liver and kidneys of the 1000-ppm SiNP-exposed group showed strong positive immune-reactive cells in both organs, and this confirmed that SiNPs induced tissue damage in both liver and kidneys by apoptosis. Oxidative stress has been reported as a toxic pathway of SiNP-induced apoptosis and inflammation in different cell types [59]. In conclusion, this study indicated that oxidative stress and apoptosis contribute to the hepato- and nephro-toxic effects of silica nanoparticles. In addition, the dose of 1000 ppm SiNPs caused marked toxicity compared with the dose of 500 ppm.
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Kasaai MR (2015) Nanosized particles of silica and its derivatives for applications in various branches of food and nutrition sectors. J Nanotechnol 2015:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/852394
Brinch A, Hansen S, Hartmann N, Baun A (2016) EU regulation of nanobiocides: challenges in implementing the biocidal product regulation (BPR). Nanomaterials 6:33. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano6020033
Yang X, Liu X, Zhang A, Lu D, Li G, Zhang Q, Liu Q, Jiang G (2019) Distinguishing the sources of silica nanoparticles by dual isotopic fingerprinting and machine learning. Nat Commun 10:1620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09629-5
Napierska D, Thomassen LC, Lison D, Martens JA, Hoet PH (2010) The nanosilica hazard: another variable entity. Part Fibre Toxicol 7:39
Yu Y, Li Y, Wang W, Jin M, Du Z et al (2013) Acute toxicity of amorphous silica nanoparticles in intravenously exposed ICR mice. PLoS ONE 8(4):e61346. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061346
Oh S, Kim B, Kim H (2014) Comparison of nanoparticle exposures between fumed and sol-gel nano-silica manufacturing facilities. Ind Health 52:190–198. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2013-0117
Croissant JG, Fatieiev Y, Khashab NM (2017) Degradability and clearance of silicon, organosilica, silsesquioxane, silica mixed oxide, and mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Adv Mater 29(9):1–51
Murugadoss S, Lison D, Godderis L, Brule SV, Mast J et al (2017) Toxicology of silica nanoparticles: an update. Arch Toxicol 91:2967–3010
Ying N, LiZhu X, Chang B, Tong Z, Cao W et al., (2016) Nanosilica and polyacrylate/nanosilica: a comparative study of acute toxicity. BioMed Res Int Volume Article ID 9353275, 7 pages
Aillon KL, Xie Y, el-Gendy N, Berkland CJ, Forrest ML (2009) Effects of nanomaterial physicochemical properties on in vivo toxicity. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:457–466
Sun L, Li Y, Liu X, Jin M, Zhang L, du Z, Guo C, Huang P, Sun Z (2011) Cytotoxicity and mitochondrial damage caused by silica nanoparticles. Toxicol in Vitro 25:1619–1629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2011.06.012
Chen Z, Meng H, Xing G, Yuan H, Zhao F, Liu R, Chang X, Gao X, Wang T, Jia G, Ye C, Chai Z, Zhao Y (2008) Age-related differences in pulmonary and cardiovascular responses to SiO2 nanoparticle inhalation: nanotoxicity has susceptible population. Environ Sci Technol 42(23):8985–8992
Shang Y, Zhu T, Li Y, Zhao JC (2009) Size-dependenthydroxyl radicals generation induced by SiO2 ultra-fine particles: the role of surfaceiron. Sci China Series B:Chem 52(7):1033–1041
Chen Y, Chen J, Dong J, Jin Y (2004) Comparing study of the effect of nanosized silicon dioxide and microsized silicon dioxide on fibrogenesis in rats. Toxicol Ind Health 20(1–5):21–27
Van der Zande M, Vandebriel RJ, Groot MJ et al (2014) Subchronic toxicity study in rats orally exposed to nanostructured silica. Particle Fibre Toxicol 11(8)
Chen M, Von Mikecz A (2005) Formation of nucleoplasmic protein aggregates impairs nuclear function in response to SiO2 nanoparticles. Exp Cell Res 305(1):51–62
Choi J, Zheng Q, Katz HE, Guilarte TR (2010) Silica based nanoparticle uptake and cellular response by primary microglia. Environ Health Perspect 118(5):589–595
Lin WYW, Huang X, Zhou D, Ma Y (2006) In vitro toxicity of silica nanoparticles in human lung cancer cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 217(3):252–259
Yang XF, Liu JJ, He HW et al (2010) SiO 2 nanoparticles induce cytotoxicity and protein expression alteration in HaCaT cells. Particle FibreToxicol 7(1)
Canesi L, Ciacci C, Vallotto D, Gallo G, Marcomini A, Pojana G (2010) In vitro effects of suspensions of selected nanoparticles (C60 fullerene, TiO2, SiO 2) on Mytilus hemocytes. Aquat Toxicol 96:151–158
Sadek A, Soliman M, Marzouk M (2014) Ameliorative effect of Allolobophora caliginosa extract on hepatotoxicity induced by silicon dioxide nanoparticles. Toxicol Ind Health 32(8):1358–1372
Henry EH, Jenness BM, Debbie S (1997) A direct comparison of mouse and rat bone marrow and blood as target tissues in the micronucleus assay. Mutat Res/Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 391(1–2):87–89
Ohkawa H, Ohishi W, Yagi K (1979) Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem 95:351–358
Beutler E, Duron O, Kelly BM (1963) Improved methods for the determination of glutathione. J Lab Clin Med 61:882–888
Fossati P, Prencipe L, Berti G (1980) Use of 3,5-dichloro-2-hydroxybenzenesulfonic acid/4-aminophenazone chromogenic system in direct enzymic assay of uric acid in serum and urine. Clin Chem 26:227–237
Reitman S, Frankel S (1957) Colorimetric determination of serum oxalacetic and glutamic pyruvic transaminase. Amer J Clin Pathol 28:56–63
Fawcett JK, Scott JE (1960) A rapid and precise method for the determination of urea. J Clin Pathol 13:156–159
Schirmeister J, Willmann H, Kiefer H (1964) Plasma creatinine as rough indicator of renal function. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 89:1018–1023
Bancroft D, Stevens A, Turner R (2012) Theory and practice of histological technique, 4th edn. Churchill, Livingstone
Ahmed KA, Korany RMS, El-Halawany HA, Ahmed KS (2019) Spirulina platensis alleviates arsenic-induced toxicity in male rats: biochemical, histopathological and immunohistochemical studies. Adv Anim Vet Sci 7(8):701–710
Korany RMS, Ahmed KS, Halawany HA, Ahmed KA (2019) Effect of long-term arsenic exposure on female Albino rats with special reference to the protective role of Spirulina platensis. Explor Anim Med Res 9(2):125–136
Fattin SM, Abd ElSalam NF, Bahaa N, Baher W (2017) Effect of silica oxide nanoparticles on liver of adult male albino rat. Light and electron microscopic study. Egypt J Histol 40(3):345–361
Park HJ, Chung HE, Lee JA et al (2014) Quantitative determination of silica nanoparticles in biological matrices and their pharmacokinetics and toxicokinetics in rats. Sci Adv Mater 6(6):1605–1610. https://doi.org/10.1166/sam.2014.1817
Çomelekoglu U, Balli E, Yalin S, Eroglu P, Bayrak G, Yaman S, Sogut F (2019) Effects of different sizes silica nanoparticle on the liver, kidney and brain in rats: Biochemical and histopathological evaluation. J Res Pharm 23(3):344–353
Azouz RA, AbuBakr HO, Khattab MS, Abou-Zeid SM. (2020) Buprofezin toxication implicates health hazards in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aqac Res 00:1–12
Gong C, Tao G, Yang L et al (2012) The role of reactive oxygen species in silicon dioxide nanoparticle-induced cytotoxicity and DNA damage in HaCaT cells. Mol Biol Rep 39:4915–4925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-1287-z
Gerloff K, Albrecht C, Boots AW, Förster I, Schins RPF (2009) Cytotoxicity and oxidative DNA damage by nanoparticles in human intestinal Caco-2 cells. Nanotoxicology. 3:355–364
Nabeshi HT, Yoshikawa K, Matsuyama Y, Nakazato S, Tochigi S et al (2011) Amorphous nanosilica induce endocytosis-dependent ROS generation and DNA damage in human keratinocytes. Part Fibre Toxicol 8:1
Du Z, Zhao D, Jing L et al (2013) Cardiovascular toxicity of different sizes amorphous silica nanoparticles in rats after intratracheal instillation. Cardiovasc Toxicol 13:194–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12012-013-9198-y
Parveen A, Rizvi SHM, Sushma et al (2015) Intranasal exposure to silica nanoparticles induce alterations in pro-inflammatory environment of rat brain: involvement of oxidative stress. Toxicol Ind Health 33:119–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233715602985
Kim YJ, Yu M, Park HO, Yang SI (2010) Comparative study of cytotoxicity, oxidative stress and genotoxicity induced by silica nanomaterials in human neuronal cell line. Mol Cell Toxicol 6:336–343
Passagne I, Morille M, Rousset M, Pujalte I, L’Azou B (2012) Implication of oxidative stress in size-dependent toxicity of silica nanoparticles in kidney cells. Toxicology 299:112–124
Duan J, Yu Y, Li Y, Yu Y, Li Y, Zhou X, Huang P, Sun Z (2013) Toxic effect of silica nanoparticles on endothelial cells through DNA damage response via Chk1-dependent G2/M checkpoint. PLoS ONE 8:e62087
Kong XH, Wang GZ, Li SJ (2007) Antioxidation and ATPase activity in the gill of mud crab Scylla serrata under cold stress. Chin J Oceanol Limnol 25:221–226
Akhtar MJ, Ahamed M, Kumar S, Siddiqui H, Patil G, Ashquin M, Ahmad I (2010) Nanotoxicity of pure silica mediated through oxidant generation rather than glutathione depletion in human lung epithelial cells. Toxicology 276:95–102
Durairaj A, Vaiyapuri TS, Kanti MU et al (2008) Protective activity and antioxidant potential of Lippia nodiflora extract in paracetamol induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Iran J Pharmacol Ther 7:83–89
Chen Z, Meng H, Xing G, Chen C, Zhao Y, Jia G, Wang T, Yuan H, Ye C, Zhao F, Chai Z, Zhu C, Fang X, Ma B, Wan L (2006) Acute toxicological effects of copper nanoparticles in vivo. Toxicol Lett 163:109–120
Wang J, Zhou G, Chen C et al (2007) Acute toxicity and biodistribution of different-sized titanium dioxide particles in mice after oral administration. Toxicol Lett 168:176–185
Liu T, Li L, Teng X et al (2011) Single and repeated dose toxicity of mesoporous hollow silica nanoparticles in intravenouslyexposedmice. Biomaterials 32:1657–1668
Fu C, Liu T, Tang F, Chen D, Li LL, Liu HY, Li XM (2012) Acute toxicity and oxidative damage induced by silica nanorattle in vivo. Chin Sci Bull 57:2525–2532
Kumar R, Roy I, Ohulchanskky TY, Vathy LA, Bergey EJ, Sajjad M, Prasad PN (2010) In vivo bio distribution and clearance studies using multimodal organically modified silica nanoparticles. ACS Nano 4:699–708
Lee S, Kim M, Lee D, Kwon TK, Khang D, Yun H, Kim S (2013) The comparative immunotoxicity of mesoporous silica nanoparticles and colloidal silica nanoparticles in mice. Int J Nanomedicine 8:147–158
So SJ, Jang IS, Han CS (2008) Effect of micro/nano silica particle feeding for mice. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 8(10):5367–5371
Ye Y, Liu J, Chen M, Sun L, Lan M (2010) In vitro toxicity of silica nanoparticles in myocardial cells. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 29:131–137
Lai LC, Qian X, Ming CW, Jin F, Na Na S, Peng ZX, Ning LY, Hui Y et al (2018) Subchronic oral toxicity of silica nanoparticles and silica microparticles in rats. Biomed Environ Sci 31(3):197–207
Naziroglu M, Karaoglu A, Aksoy AO (2004) Selenium and higher dose vitamin E administration protects cisplatin induced oxidative damage to renal, liver, lens tissues in rats. Toxicology 195:221–230
Hassankhani R, Esmaeillou M, Tehrani AA et al (2014) In vivo toxicity of orally administrated silicon dioxide nanoparticles in healthy adult mice. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3413-7
Lee J, Kim M, Paek H, Kim Y, Kim M, Lee J, Jeong J, Choi S (2014) Tissue distribution and excretion kinetics of orally administered silica nanoparticles in rats. Int J Nanomedicine 9:251–260
Park EJ, Park K (2009) Oxidative stress and proinflammatory responses induced by silica nanoparticles in vivo and in vitro. Toxicol Lett 184:18–25
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally in the planning of the study and drafting the manuscript. All of them approve the final version of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Ethical Approval
This study was approved by the Animal Use and Care Committee at Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt. This study was performed after receiving ethical approval number.
Consent for publication
All authors have reviewed the manuscript and approved its submission for publication.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Azouz, R.A., Korany, R.M.S. Toxic Impacts of Amorphous Silica Nanoparticles on Liver and Kidney of Male Adult Rats: an In Vivo Study. Biol Trace Elem Res 199, 2653–2662 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-020-02386-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-020-02386-3