Abstract
Purpose of the Review
Summarising the evidence for pre- and post-stroke physical activity (PA) and exercise to reduce stroke risk, and improve recovery and brain health.
Recent Findings
Pre-stroke PA reduces the risk of stroke, and post-stroke PA and exercise reduce cardiovascular risk factors, which can moderate the risk of recurrent strokes. Pre-clinical evidence indicates that exercise enhances neuroplasticity. The results from clinical studies showed that exercise changes brain activity patterns in stroke survivors, which can be a signal neuroplasticity. The intensity of pre- and post-stroke PA and exercise is a key factor with higher intensities leading to greater benefits, including improvement in fitness. Having low fitness levels is an independent predictor for increased risk of stroke.
Summary
Higher intensity leads to greater benefits; however, the optimum intensity of PA and exercise is yet unknown and needs to be further investigated. Strategies to decrease sedentary behaviour and improve fitness need to be considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The prevalence of stroke in Australia between 2003 and 2015 has been stable at 1.7%, while stroke-related mortality has been declining [1]. Similar trends have been reported in the USA and Europe [2]. Although fewer people are dying from stroke, about two thirds of stroke survivors need some level of assistance in their day-to-day lives [3]. Around 80% of strokes are preventable by addressing modifiable risk factors [4]. Physical activity (PA) is one of these modifiable risk factors, with higher levels of regular PA reducing the risk of stroke. The health benefits of regular PA and exercise are well described [5, 6••]. In more recent years, there has been an increased interest in the effects of PA and exercise on brain health [7,8,9,10]. Several studies have shown that PA and exercise not only are beneficial in improving cardiovascular health but also may help to slow down cognitive decline and reduce the risk of dementia [11, 12]. In addition to being a modifiable risk factor for stroke, PA and exercise may also be neuroprotective. Higher levels of pre-stroke PA and exercise are associated with reduced stroke severity [13], while post-stroke PA and aerobic exercise may play an important role in recovery and neuroplasticity [14, 15•].
PA, exercise, and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) are closely linked. While these terms are frequently used interchangeably, there are clear distinctions between them. Understanding the interaction between PA, exercise, and brain health is important, given that they play a different role in neuroprotection and neuroplasticity. PA is defined as any bodily movement by skeletal muscles, which results in energy expenditure; it can include any type of movement at any level or intensity [16]. Exercise is more specific in that it also requires bodily movement by skeletal muscle activity and energy, but involves movements that are planned, structured, and repetitive with the aim to improve or maintain physical fitness [16]. The amount of energy required for either PA or exercise depends on the individual and the level of intensity of the activity or exercise. Physical fitness consists of two different components: health-related and skills-related fitness [17]. One component is health-related physical fitness and includes cardiorespiratory and muscular endurance, muscular strength, body composition, and flexibility; the other component is skill-related fitness and is more focused on athletic performance and includes agility, balance, coordination, speed, power, and reaction time.
In this review, we discuss the potential of PA and exercise-based interventions, aiming to improve CRF to reduce the impact of stroke. We review the evidence of the effects of pre- and post-stroke PA and exercise on stroke risk and recovery, the mechanisms that underpin the role of PA and exercise in neuroprotection and neuroplasticity, and discuss the important aspects we need to consider to harness these effects to improve outcomes after stroke.
The Importance of Pre-stroke PA
In a meta-analysis of 18 large epidemiology cohort studies and 5 case-control studies, Lee et al. found that people who are moderately and highly active have a lower risk of stroke incidence or mortality by 20 and 27%, respectively [18]. Although the definitions for PA varied across the studies, the results were consistently in favour of higher levels of PA. Furthermore, the results were geographically consistent, as studies were conducted in different countries and continents, including North America, the UK, Japan, Australia, and the Netherlands. The results from other studies also revealed the potential for pre-stroke PA to positively influence stroke outcomes, particularly reducing stroke severity and improving functional outcomes after stroke.
Pre-stroke PA Is Associated with Less Severe Strokes and Better Functional Outcomes
Stroke severity is commonly described by using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), where higher scores indicate a higher severity of stroke (i.e. larger number of stroke symptoms at greater severity) [19]. The relationships between pre-stroke PA and stroke severity at hospital admission reported in 10 studies we identified are conflicting [13, 20,21,22,23, 24•, 25,26,27,28]. In the majority of the studies (8 out of 10), the authors observed that greater levels of PA are associated with lower stroke severity [13, 21,22,23, 24•, 25, 27, 28]. However, the Decourcelle et al. and Stroud et al. found no relationship between pre-stroke PA levels and stroke severity in ischemic stroke patients [20, 26]. The relationship between pre-stroke PA and functional outcomes after stroke are consistent with the results of the majority of the aforementioned studies, showing that higher levels of pre-stroke PA are associated with better functional outcomes after stroke (as measured by the modified Rankin Scale or the Barthel Index) [22, 23, 24•, 26,27,28].
Stroke features, such as infarct volume, are significantly correlated with stroke severity on admission and are independently associated with functional outcomes after stroke [29]. Stroud et al. investigated the relationship between infarct size and pre-stroke PA and found no association in 673 stroke survivors [26]. However, Ricciardi et al. found that higher levels of pre-stroke PA were independently associated with lower NIHSS scores on admission, presence of distal occlusions, and smaller final infarct volumes (30 days post stroke) in 159 ischemic stroke survivors [25]. Blauenfeldt et al. found that higher levels of pre-stroke PA were associated with a reduction of 39–88% of acute infarct growth (measured within 24 h after stroke admission) and smaller final infarct volumes (measured 1-month post-stroke) in 102 ischemic stroke patients [30]. These findings highlight the importance of pre-stroke PA levels in relation to key clinical prognostic indicators of stroke.
Study Design and Assessment of Pre-stroke PA
Prospective and Retrospective Design Considerations
Methodological factors are important to consider when interpreting the study results from pre-stroke PA studies. Firstly, the most common research design used to investigate the effects of pre-stroke PA levels on stroke outcomes is a retrospective case-control study, where stroke patients were identified after a stroke and asked to report their PA levels prior to their stroke. Retrospective studies are relatively less expensive and less time consuming, because stroke admissions can be used as an opportunistic point of contact [31]. Fewer authors used a prospective approach by including a PA assessment prior to the stroke event. The Physician’s Health Study is a large cohort study (n = 21,794), including male physicians who did not have a history of stroke or TIA at the time of enrolment [32]. Another prospective study, which was part of the Women’s Health Initiative Study, included a subset of women who suffered a stroke (n = 3173) [33]. Prospective studies are more accurate in collecting information on PA levels than retrospective studies. However, prospective studies are expensive and time consuming because waiting for outcomes—in this case a stroke—would involve long periods of follow-up [31]. Although less robust, a retrospective design can be a pragmatic choice and might be the only possibility in case of limited funding.
Measurement of Pre-stroke PA
Prospective studies have the advantage of potentially using objective measures like activity monitors with accelerometers or pedometers. However, to-date, objective measures to examine the relationship between pre-stroke PA and stroke outcomes have not been used in prospective studies. For retrospective studies, self-reported PA levels remain to be the most feasible method to assess pre-stroke PA levels. A commonly used approach to assess PA levels was to dichotomize individuals into categories of those who were “active” or “inactive” based on PA recommendations [20,21,22, 28]. Additionally, a variety of self-reported PA tools have been used to measure pre-stroke PA, including the Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Scale [34], Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) [35], and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [36]. Unfortunately, the interpretation of self-reported PA levels can be challenging due to the inherent limitations of recall bias [37]. This may be especially true in stroke patients who may be experiencing changes in cognition and memory, depressive symptoms, and negative self-image and social desirability [38]. Furthermore, self-report PA questionnaires often do not separate the distinct constructs of PA and exercise. Nonetheless, self-report PA questionnaires are valuable measurement tools to study the relationship between PA and health outcomes.
Translation of Pre-stroke PA Estimation Tools into Exercise Prescriptions
There are several considerations when choosing a tool to measure PA levels. The before mentioned method to categorise participants in groups by dichotomising PA levels allows for ease of measurement within clinical registries or inpatient care settings however; it does not offer much information to help clinicians prescribe the optimal dose of PA or exercise. That is, the adequate frequency, intensity, type, or duration of PA necessary to achieve the benefits observed cannot be elucidated with simple dichotomy of PA participation. A possible option is to use a standardised questionnaire, which can provide some information about the necessary dose of activity. The IPAQ for example is a self-report questionnaire, in which the results are converted to enable authors to express PA levels in metabolic equivalent scores (METs) [36]. López-Cancio et al. used the IPAQ to investigate the effect of pre-stroke PA on stroke outcomes and included 126 participants in their analyses from the Pre-stroke Physical Activity and Functional Recovery in patients with Ischemic Stroke and Arterial Occlusions (AFRICA) study; they found that people with less than 3000 MET-minutes/week of PA were more likely to have severe strokes on admission [24•]. Also, participating in PA with more than 1000 MET-min/week was independently associated with better functional outcomes at 3-month post-stroke [24•]. By expressing PA levels in terms of MET-minutes per week, clinicians could potentially use the PA Compendium to inform recommendations of the appropriate types and amount of PA needed to achieve the observed benefits with their patients [39]. Other ways to conceptualise PA is to focus on time spent walking or step counts. Ursin et al. used the amount of time spent walking—an activity that is common and accessible for most people—to quantify pre-stroke PA levels [27]. They examined the effect on self-reported pre-stroke leisure walking behaviour on stroke outcomes and reported that leisure walking for greater than 30 min per day was associated with favourable functional outcomes post-stroke [27].
A well-considered selection of PA measurement methods can help provide clear clinical recommendations for patients. It can give valuable information for studying the dose-response relationship between pre-stroke PA or exercise levels, stroke severity, and functional outcomes.
The Importance of Post-stroke PA and Cerebrovascular Risk
Considering that low levels of PA and exercise are risk factors for stroke, it is not surprising that the majority of stroke survivors also have high cardiovascular risk profiles, which includes low levels of PA and CRF. In a systematic review of 103 studies including 5306 participants, Fini et al. showed that PA levels post-stroke (i.e., focusing on step count and time spent on moderate to vigorous intensity activity) are very low regardless of the time point post-stroke (i.e. subacute and chronic phase), and limited data was available on PA levels in the acute phase post-stroke [40]. Similar patterns are seen regarding CRF levels, where stroke survivors tend to have low CRF [41], and it remains unchanged in the first 12 months after stroke onset [42]. Increasing PA and exercise to improve CRF in stroke patients is clinically important to consider as part of secondary stroke prevention. The occurrence of a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke is associated with a 10 to 20% risk of recurrent stroke in the first 90 days after the first event [43,44,45,46]. Increasing PA levels and exercise also has beneficial impacts on other known risk factors. Exercise-based interventions after stroke or TIA can improve risk factors, such as reducing systolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, and insulin and increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [47, 48•]. These improvements in risk factors also moderate the risk of recurrent stroke [49].
There is strong evidence for the positive effects of exercise interventions on improving CRF and mobility after stroke [15•]. This evidence is based on a Cochrane Systematic Review conducted by Saunders et al., which included 58 trials involving 2797 participants to investigate the effect of physical fitness training on stroke recovery [15•]. The importance of promoting PA and exercise in post-stroke rehabilitation has been recognised in several clinical guidelines [50, 51]. The recommendation now clearly states that increasing PA and exercises to improve CRF should be included in stroke rehabilitation programs.
Measuring Post-stroke PA
The definitions and measurement tools also vary across post-stroke PA studies. A comprehensive review of the different methods used after stroke showed that the majority of researchers (66/91 studies; n = 3497 participants) used an accelerometer to quantify PA [52]. The most commonly reported measures of PA were step counts and walking time [52]. The other frequently used method was direct observation; this was mainly applied in inpatient settings, and the outcomes reported were type of activity (e.g. walking, sitting), location, and people present [52]. Even though accelerometers and pedometers provide an objective measure with high temporal resolution, it does not provide information regarding the context, such as where the activity took place and who was present. This contextual information can be collected using observational mapping; however, this method is very time intensive and has poor temporal resolution.
There are no clear recommendations about which PA outcomes are the most relevant in a stroke population. However, in a review that investigated the effect of using activity monitors on PA levels in stroke survivors, step counts and time spent in moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) were the main outcome measures [53]. Furthermore, step count has been identified as an important factor related to recurrent stroke and was identified as an independent predictor of new vascular events in stroke survivors [54].
Potential Mechanisms of Neuroprotective and Neuroplastic Effects of PA and Exercise
Neuroprotective Mechanisms
There are many potential neuroprotective mechanisms associated with increased PA and CRF. The beneficial impact of PA on cerebral vascular function in the perspective of stroke prevention has been described as a complex interaction of neuro- and angiogenesis for re-generative and repair mechanisms in the human brain [55]. One mechanism is via the expression of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF). López-Cancio et al. found that stroke patients with high pre-stroke PA levels had higher levels of VEGF 7 days after admission, and those with high levels of VEGF measured at 7 days and 3 months post-stroke were more likely to have better functional outcomes 3 months post-stroke [24•]. Furthermore, individuals with higher PA levels prior to stroke had greater increase in VEGF from baseline to 7 days after stroke, and this increase in VEGF within the first 7 days after stroke was associated with better functional outcomes (mRS ≤ 2) at 3-months follow-up and smaller final infarct size [24•]. Given that VEGF plays important roles in neuroprotection, angiogenesis, and post-ischemic neuronal repair [56], PA may contribute to neuroprotection via upregulation of VEGF expression. However, the exact dose of PA necessary to increase VEGF in elderly people remains unclear [57].
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) plays a key role in neuronal survival, growth, and plasticity in the brain [58] and has been found to be upregulated after exercise in stroke populations to promote neuroprotection and neuroplasticity after stroke. [59,60,61]. However, López-Cancio et al. did not observe any changes in BDNF levels on admission, 7 and 30 days post-stroke, and this was not related to pre-stroke PA levels [24•]. The exercise-induced upregulation of BDNF seems to be sustained and the least transient compared with other neurotrophins [10]. Furthermore, preclinical studies have shown that the upregulation of BDNF is dose-dependent after stroke. Ploughman et al. investigated the temporal effects of different PA and exercise protocols on the upregulation of different proteins linked to neuroplasticity [62]. While higher intensity forced exercise led to rapid increase of BDNF, the authors showed that less intense and more frequent short bouts of voluntary exercise led to an upregulation of BDNF that was sustained over time compared with higher intensity forced exercise in rats [62]. This concept can potentially be translated to a clinical application for recovery in human stroke survivors. The sustained upregulation of BDNF after short bouts of exercise to increase neuroplasticity may be useful for rehabilitation sessions, such that aerobic exercise could be used as primer for motor training [59].
Plasma fibrinogen plays an important role in platelet aggregation and coagulation. Increased levels of fibrinogen have been strongly correlated with increased risk of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attacks [63]. Furthermore, Lin et al. found that PA can lead to decrease in fibrinogen levels in their meta-analysis of randomised control trials of exercise training interventions [64]. Ricciardi et al. found that participants with higher levels of pre-stroke PA had lower levels of fibrinogen on admission [25]. Deplanque et al. also found participants who had higher reported levels of PA had lower levels of fibrinogen on admission [22]. Regular PA and exercise have been shown to reduce fibrinogen levels in health older adults [65, 66]. However, the effect of exercise training on fibrinogen levels in stroke patients is unclear.
Neuroplastic Mechanisms
Neuroplasticity is defined as the ability of the central nervous system to undergo structural and functional changes as a result of new experiences [67]. There is strong evidence from animal models of stroke that a window of opportunity for neuroplasticity opens in the acute phase (3–30 days) [68], and that exercise interventions focussed on improving CRF performed within this time can enhance neuroplasticity [69••] and facilitate brain repair processes [14]. Furthermore, it seems that higher intensities exercises to improve CRF lead to greater neuroplastic changes in animal models [14].
Several human studies have also demonstrated an association between functional changes and proposed neuroplasticity processes with the brain after participating in exercise interventions. Enzinger et al. investigated the effect of a 4-week intervention involving treadmill training with partial body weight support on functional reorganisation using functional MRI in 18 chronic stroke survivors. The training consisted of four 5-min bouts a week for 4 weeks; participants were encouraged to walk at a speed of 2 mph (0.89 ms−1). The fMRI task consisted of unilateral foot movements. The fMRI block design used two 30-s conditions: active ankle dorsiflexion paced by a visual cue (5 times) and passive movement of the ankle by the experimenter (4 times). Active and passive movement blocks alternated with 21-s rest periods. The authors showed that the signal changes after exercise comparing the active movement of the paretic foot versus rest in the cortical and subcortical motor areas were positively correlated with an increase in walking endurance after the intervention [70]. Greater walking endurance was associated with increased brain activity in the primary sensorimotor cortex, the paracentral lobules, the cingulate motor area, and the caudate nuclei bilaterally and in the lateral thalamus of the affected hemisphere [70]. In another study, an exercise intervention of balance, mobility, and aerobic exercise for chronic stroke survivors (n = 8) led to improvements in mobility and cognition (i.e. memory and delayed memory) [71]. Using the same fMRI paradigm as described in the Enzinger et al. study, the authors also observed that change in cerebral activation could be a signal of plasticity [71]. Furthermore, a randomised controlled trial conducted by Luft et al. included chronic stroke survivors with mobility impairments (n = 71) who received a 6-month program of either aerobic treadmill training or stretching [72]. The authors stated that in a subset of participants (exercises group n = 15 and stretching group n = 17), the improvements in walking speed in the exercise group vs stretching group correlated with increased activation in posterior cerebellar lobe and midbrain [72]. These results suggest that neuroplastic mechanisms are an important component of the benefit of exercise on stroke recovery.
Recommendations for Future Research
Improving PA Levels or Improving CRF?
The results of large epidemiological studies identified CRF as an independent factor related to stroke risk. In a prospective epidemiological study including 2011 men, low CRF, as measured by a graded exercise test on a bicycle ergometer, was an independent predictor for increased risk of stroke, regardless of PA levels [73]. Another large prospective cohort study, including 16,878 men, assessed pre-stroke CRF using a maximal graded exercise testing with gas analysis and examined its relationship to stroke mortality. The authors reported that moderate and high levels of CRF were associated with a lower risk of stroke mortality [74]. Furthermore, CRF is also more related to brain connectivity in elderly compared with PA [75]. This will have implications for the current public health message about PA, as we may need: a stronger focus on improving CRF rather than only increasing PA levels to promote health and healthy ageing [76].
Strategies to Increase PA Levels: Optimal Dose and Timing?
Well-established principles exist regarding the appropriate exercise parameters required to improve CRF; that is, a minimal intensity threshold is required to induce a cardiorespiratory training effect [77, 78]. Therefore, it is important to consider the difference between interventions aimed to improve CRF and interventions aimed to increase PA levels. Many strategies and interventions to increase PA have been tested, including targeting motivation to be more active [79], emphasis on lifestyle changes [80, 81], or structured exercise programs [82]. While interventions aimed at increasing PA levels in healthy populations can improve CRF, structured exercise programs may be more effective in improving CRF [81]. Physiological regulators for improving CRF are shared between exercise and brain health [83, 84••]. It is important to further investigate the dose-response relationship regarding the effects of PA and exercise on brain health. For example, the results of several studies showed a relationship between moderate to vigorous level pre-stroke PA and neuroprotective markers [13, 23, 24•, 25].
The evidence for strategies to improve PA levels after stroke is limited. The authors of a systematic review, including four small trials, did not find an effect of the use of PA monitors to improve PA levels found [53]. Aguir et al. conducted a systematic review of interventions aimed at improving PA after stroke [85]. In half of the included studies (9 of 18 studies included), the experimental intervention was a structured exercise program, including CRF exercise or resistance training and of the studies that showed an improvement of PA levels in favour of the experimental intervention; the majority included a CRF or resistance training component [85]. These results highlight the close relationship between CRF and PA levels and suggest that by improving CRF, PA levels might increase. The evidence for the effect of physical fitness interventions to improve CRF and mobility after stroke is strong [15•]. While it remains important to promote PA levels in stroke survivors, it may be more effective to implement structured exercise programming to improve CRF. Although there is strong evidence for the effectiveness of CRF training, it remains unclear what the best timing is to start CRF training post-stroke. If we want to make use of the possible neuroplastic effect, we need to consider an early start after stroke during which the brain is most plastic [68, 69••]. Further research should focus on timing of training, balancing the effect of neuroplasticity and considering potential harmful effects of an early start [86]. In the early stages, post-stroke light intensity PA and exercise may be beneficial [87]. The effects of exercise on brain health after stroke and how it can enhance neuroplasticity need further investigation. The focus should be on determining the optimal intensity and modality of training (i.e. frequent short bouts or continuous training) to prime the brain for motor practice. Furthermore, the relationship between timing, intensity, frequency, and recovery after stroke needs further exploration.
We mainly focused on PA and exercise in this review; however, future studies may consider examining the effects of sedentary activity on stroke outcomes. Sedentary activity is an independent predictor of disease incidence, hospitalisation, and mortality in adults, regardless of PA levels [88]. After stroke, in acute care and inpatient rehabilitation settings, more than 80% of the time was spent sedentary [89]. In one study, sedentary behaviour was measured using an accelerometer in stroke survivors within the first month of inpatient rehabilitation and found that sedentary time was still high (75% of the spent sedentary) [90], but little is known about sedentary time in stroke survivors in the community [91]. Euzeugwu and Manss have shown that an 8-week home-based behavioural change program to reduce sedentary behaviour in stroke survivors is feasible [92]. It is not yet known if this intervention reduces sedentary behaviour; also, it is still unclear if reducing sedentary behaviour is beneficial to improve stroke recovery. Future studies should focus on developing interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour and investigate its effects on stroke outcomes.
Conclusion
There is strong evidence for the relationship between pre-stroke PA and exercise and stroke risk; this is similar for post-stroke PA and exercise and stroke recovery. There are strong signals that PA and exercise play a role in neuroprotection and neuroplasticity, but these effects and mechanisms need to be further explored. In almost all of the studies discussed in this review, there is an indication that higher intensity leads to greater benefits. However, the optimum intensity of PA and exercise and likewise the optimum timing of post-stroke interventions to enhance recovery are still unclear. Intensity of activity is also important given that low CRF has been identified as an independent factor of increased stroke risk. Therefore, strategies to improve fitness need to be considered. The high levels of sedentary behaviour after stroke will negatively impact on recovery; decreasing sedentary behaviour, increasing PA levels, and improving CRF should all be included in future strategies to prevent stroke and recover from stroke.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s health 2018. Australia’s Health Series No. 16, 2018.
Zhang Y, Chapman AM, Plested M, Jackson D, Purroy F. The incidence, prevalence, and mortality of stroke in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK, and the US: a literature review. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:436125.
The economic impact of stroke in Australia. Deloitte Access Economics commisioned by the Stroke Foundation. In: 2013.
O'Donnell MJ, Chin SL, Rangarajan S, Xavier D, Liu L, Zhang H, et al. Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): a case-control study. Lancet. 2016;388(10046):761–75.
Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006;174(6):801–9.
•• Warburton DER, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: a systematic review of current systematic reviews. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017;32(5):541–56 This is a systematic review of systematic reviews demonstrating the dose-reponse relationship between physical activity and the reduced risk of various chronic conditions (such as cardiovascular disease, some types of cancers, type-2 diabetes) and all-cause mortality in adults and adolescents.
Penedo FJ, Dahn JR. Exercise and well-being: a review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity. Curr Opin Psychiatr. 2005;18(2):189–93.
Kramer AF, Erickson KI. Effects of physical activity on cognition, well-being, and brain: human interventions. Alzheimers Dement. 2007;3(2 Suppl):S45–51.
Erickson KI, Hillman CH, Kramer AF. Physical activity, brain, and cognition. Current Opinion in Behavioural Sciences. 2015;4:27–33.
Cotman CW, Berchtold NC. Exercise: a behavioral intervention to enhance brain health and plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 2002;25(6):295–301.
Tolppanen AM, Solomon A, Kulmala J, Kåreholt I, Ngandu T, Rusanen M, et al. Leisure-time physical activity from mid- to late life, body mass index, and risk of dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(4):434–443 e436.
Podewils LJ, Guallar E, Kuller LH, Fried LP, Lopez OL, Carlson M, et al. Physical activity, APOE genotype, and dementia risk: findings from the Cardiovascular Health Cognition Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(7):639–51.
Reinholdsson M, Palstam A, Sunnerhagen KS. Prestroke physical activity could influence acute stroke severity (part of PAPSIGOT). Neurology. 2018;91(16):e1461–7.
Ploughman M, Austin MW, Glynn L, Corbett D. The effects of poststroke aerobic exercise on neuroplasticity: a systematic review of animal and clinical studies. Transl Stroke Res. 2015;6(1):13–28.
• Saunders DH, Sanderson M, Hayes S, et al. Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(3):CD003316 This is review provides strong evidence for the effrcts of exercise to improve cardiorespiartory fitness. The recommendation regarding exrcise in current clinical guidelines is based on this eveidence.
Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2):126–31.
Pate RR. A new definition of youth fitness. Physician Sportsmed. 1983;11:77–83.
Lee CD, Folsom AR, Blair SN. Physical activity and stroke risk: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2003;34(10):2475–81.
Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20(7):864–70.
Decourcelle A, Moulin S, Sibon I, Murao K, Ronzière T, Godefroy O, et al. Influence of previous physical activity on the outcome of patients treated by thrombolytic therapy for stroke. J Neurol. 2015;262(11):2513–9.
Deplanque D, Masse I, Lefebvre C, Libersa C, Leys D, Bordet R. Prior TIA, lipid-lowering drug use, and physical activity decrease ischemic stroke severity. Neurology. 2006;67(8):1403–10.
Deplanque D, Masse I, Libersa C, Leys D, Bordet R. Previous leisure-time physical activity dose dependently decreases ischemic stroke severity. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:614925.
Krarup LH, Truelsen T, Gluud C, et al. Prestroke physical activity is associated with severity and long-term outcome from first-ever stroke. Neurology. 2008;71(17):1313–8.
• Lopez-Cancio E, Ricciardi AC, Sobrino T, et al. Reported prestroke physical activity is associated with vascular endothelial growth factor expression and good outcomes after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(2):425–30 In addition to demonstrating a reduction in stroke severity with physical activity participation, the authors also demonstrated that increased physical activity levels are related to smaller infarct volumes and higher levels of vascular endothelial growth factor expression. These findings highlight a clinically relevant basis for the relationship between stroke severity and physical activity.
Ricciardi AC, Lopez-Cancio E, Perez de la Ossa N, et al. Prestroke physical activity is associated with good functional outcome and arterial recanalization after stroke due to a large vessel occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;37(4):304–11.
Stroud N, Mazwi TM, Case LD, et al. Prestroke physical activity and early functional status after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80(9):1019–22.
Ursin MH, Ihle-Hansen H, Fure B, Tveit A, Bergland A. Effects of premorbid physical activity on stroke severity and post-stroke functioning. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47(7):612–7.
Wen CP, Liu CH, Jeng JS, Hsu SP, Chen CH, Lien LM, et al. Pre-stroke physical activity is associated with fewer post-stroke complications, lower mortality and a better long-term outcome. Eur J Neurol. 2017;24(12):1525–31.
Thijs VN, Lansberg MG, Beaulieu C, Marks MP, Moseley ME, Albers GW. Is early ischemic lesion volume on diffusion-weighted imaging an independent predictor of stroke outcome? A multivariable analysis. Stroke. 2000;31(11):2597–602.
Blauenfeldt RA, Hougaard KD, Mouridsen K, Andersen G. High prestroke physical activity is associated with reduced infarct growth in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous tPA and randomized to remote ischemic perconditioning. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;44(1–2):88–95.
Euser AM, Zoccali C, Jager KJ, Dekker FW. Cohort studies: prospective versus retrospective. Nephron Clin Pract. 2009;113(3):c214–7.
Rist PM, Lee IM, Kase CS, Gaziano JM, Kurth T. Physical activity and functional outcomes from cerebral vascular events in men. Stroke. 2011;42(12):3352–6.
Bell CL, LaCroix A, Masaki K, Hade EM, Manini T, Mysiw WJ, et al. Prestroke factors associated with poststroke mortality and recovery in older women in the Women’s Health Initiative. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(8):1324–30.
Grimby G, Borjesson M, Jonsdottir IH, et al. The “Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale” and its application to health research. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25 Suppl 4:119–25.
Washburn RA, Smith KW, Jette AM, Janney CA. The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(2):153–62.
Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–95.
Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Connor Gorber S, Tremblay M. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:56.
Austin H, Hill HA, Flanders WD, Greenberg RS. Limitations in the application of case-control methodology. Epidemiol Rev. 1994;16(1):65–76.
Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(8):1575–81.
Fini NA, Holland AE, Keating J, Simek J, Bernhardt J. How physically active are people following stroke? Systematic review and quantitative synthesis. Phys Ther. 2017;97(7):707–17.
Smith AC, Saunders DH, Mead G. Cardiorespiratory fitness after stroke: a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2012;7(6):499–510.
Baert I, Daly D, Dejaeger E, Vanroy C, Vanlandewijck Y, Feys H. Evolution of cardiorespiratory fitness after stroke: a 1-year follow-up study. Influence of prestroke patients’ characteristics and stroke-related factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(4):669–76.
Kleindorfer D, Panagos P, Pancioli A, Khoury J, Kissela B, Woo D, et al. Incidence and short-term prognosis of transient ischemic attack in a population-based study. Stroke. 2005;36(4):720–3.
Johnston SC, Sidney S, Bernstein AL, Gress DR. A comparison of risk factors for recurrent TIA and stroke in patients diagnosed with TIA. Neurology. 2003;60(2):280–5.
Coull AJ, Lovett JK, Rothwell PM. Population based study of early risk of stroke after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke: implications for public education and organisation of services. BMJ. 2004;328(7435):326.
Lovett JK, Coull AJ, Rothwell PM. Early risk of recurrence by subtype of ischemic stroke in population-based incidence studies. Neurology. 2004;62(4):569–73.
Prior PL, Hachinski V, Unsworth K, Chan R, Mytka S, O'Callaghan C, et al. Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation for secondary prevention after transient ischemic attack or mild stroke: I: feasibility and risk factors. Stroke. 2011;42(11):3207–13.
• D'Isabella NT, Shkredova DA, Richardson JA, Tang A. Effects of exercise on cardiovascular risk factors following stroke or transient ischemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(12):1561–72 The authors of this paper identified that there is an effect between exercise based interventions and cardiovascular risk factors in stroke survivors.
Gallanagh S, Quinn TJ, Alexander J, Walters MR. Physical activity in the prevention and treatment of stroke. ISRN Neurol. 2011;2011:953818.
Billinger SA, Arena R, Bernhardt J, Eng JJ, Franklin BA, Johnson CM, et al. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45(8):2532–53.
Mackay-Lyons M, Macko RF, Eng JJ, et al. AEROBICS: aerobic exercise recommendations to optimize best practice after stroke. In: 2013.
Fini NA, Holland AE, Keating J, Simek J, Bernhardt J. How is physical activity monitored in people following stroke? Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(19):1717–31.
Lynch EA, Jones TM, Simpson DB, et al. Activity monitors for increasing physical activity in adult stroke survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;(7):CD012543.
Kono Y, Kawajiri H, Kamisaka K, Kamiya K, Akao K, Asai C, et al. Predictive impact of daily physical activity on new vascular events in patients with mild ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2015;10(2):219–23.
Schmidt W, Endres M, Dimeo F, Jungehulsing GJ. Train the vessel, gain the brain: physical activity and vessel function and the impact on stroke prevention and outcome in cerebrovascular disease. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(4):303–12.
Greenberg DA, Jin K. Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and stroke. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70(10):1753–61.
Vital TM, Stein AM, de Melo Coelho FG, Arantes FJ, Teodorov E, Santos-Galduróz RF. Physical exercise and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in elderly: a systematic review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014;59(2):234–9.
Binder DK, Scharfman HE. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Growth Factors. 2004;22(3):123–31.
Mang CS, Campbell KL, Ross CJ, Boyd LA. Promoting neuroplasticity for motor rehabilitation after stroke: considering the effects of aerobic exercise and genetic variation on brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Phys Ther. 2013;93(12):1707–16.
Mackay CP, Kuys SS, Brauer SG. The effect of aerobic exercise on brain-derived neurotrophic factor in people with neurological disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neural Plast. 2017;2017:4716197.
Huang T, Larsen KT, Ried-Larsen M, Moller NC, Andersen LB. The effects of physical activity and exercise on brain-derived neurotrophic factor in healthy humans: a review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(1):1–10.
Ploughman M, Granter-Button S, Chernenko G, Attwood Z, Tucker BA, Mearow KM, et al. Exercise intensity influences the temporal profile of growth factors involved in neuronal plasticity following focal ischemia. Brain Res. 2007;1150:207–16.
Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Power DA, Gutnikov SA, Algra A, van Gijn J, et al. Fibrinogen concentration and risk of ischemic stroke and acute coronary events in 5113 patients with transient ischemic attack and minor ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2004;35(10):2300–5.
Lin Y, Liu Z, Qiu Y, Zhang J, Wu H, Liang R, et al. Clinical significance of plasma D-dimer and fibrinogen in digestive cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(10):1494–503.
Schuit AJ, Schouten EG, Kluft C, de Maat M, Menheere PP, Kok FJ. Effect of strenuous exercise on fibrinogen and fibrinolysis in healthy elderly men and women. Thromb Haemost. 1997;78(2):845–51.
Ernst E. Regular exercise reduces fibrinogen levels: a review of longitudinal studies. Br J Sports Med. 1993;27(3):175–6.
Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear R. 2008;51(1):S225–39.
Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(12):861–72.
•• Ploughman M, Kelly LP. Four birds with one stone? Reparative, neuroplastic, cardiorespiratory, and metabolic benefits of aerobic exercise poststroke. Curr Opin Neurol. 2016;29(6):684–92 This narrative review provides an overview of pre-clinical and clinical evidence for aerobic exercise to enahance neuroplasticity and optimise recovery after stroke; the authors created a model of aerobic exercise training that can be applied in subacute stroke.
Enzinger C, Dawes H, Johansen-Berg H, Wade D, Bogdanovic M, Collett J, et al. Brain activity changes associated with treadmill training after stroke. Stroke. 2009;40(7):2460–7.
Landsmann B, Pinter D, Pirker E, Pichler G, Schippinger W, Weiss EM, et al. An exploratory intervention study suggests clinical benefits of training in chronic stroke to be paralleled by changes in brain activity using repeated fMRI. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:97–103.
Luft AR, Macko RF, Forrester LW, Villagra F, Ivey F, Sorkin JD, et al. Treadmill exercise activates subcortical neural networks and improves walking after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2008;39(12):3341–50.
Kurl S, Laukkanen JA, Rauramaa R, Lakka TA, Sivenius J, Salonen JT. Cardiorespiratory fitness and the risk for stroke in men. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(14):1682–8.
Lee CD, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory fitness and stroke mortality in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(4):592–5.
Voss MW, Weng TB, Burzynska AZ, Wong CN, Cooke GE, Clark R, et al. Fitness, but not physical activity, is related to functional integrity of brain networks associated with aging. Neuroimage. 2016;131:113–25.
Bouchard C, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT. Less sitting, more physical activity, or higher fitness? Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90:1533–40.
Egan B, Carson BP, Garcia-Roves PM, Chibalin AV, Sarsfield FM, Barron N, et al. Exercise intensity-dependent regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor coactivator-1 mRNA abundance is associated with differential activation of upstream signalling kinases in human skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 2010;588(Pt 10):1779–90.
Gormley SE, Swain DP, High R, et al. Effect of intensity of aerobic training on VO2 max. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(7):1336–43.
Chase JA, Conn VS. Meta-analysis of fitness outcomes from motivational physical activity interventions. Nurs Res. 2013;62(5):294–304.
Bravata DM, Wells CK, Brass LM, Morgan T, Lichtman JH, Concato J. Dietary fish or seafood consumption is not related to cerebrovascular disease risk in twin veterans. Neuroepidemiology. 2007;28(3):186–90.
Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, Garcia ME, Kohl HW 3rd, Blair SN. Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness: a randomized trial. JAMA. 1999;281(4):327–34.
Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, et al. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22(4 Suppl):73–107.
Hawley JA, Hargreaves M, Joyner MJ, Zierath JR. Integrative biology of exercise. Cell. 2014;159(4):738–49.
•• Delezie J, Handschin C. Endocrine crosstalk between skeletal muscle and the brain. Front Neurol. 2018;9:698 This comprehensive narrative review discusses an important field of research examining the biological communication between skeletal muscle and brain. The authors summarize the relationship between myokines, hormones produced by contracting skeletal muscle, and key biological processes involved with optimal brain health.
Aguiar LT, Nadeau S, Martins JC, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Britto RR, Faria CDC M Efficacy of interventions aimed at improving physical activity in individuals with stroke: a systematic review, Disabil Rehabil, pp. 1–16, 2018.
Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9988):46–55.
Kramer SF, Cumming T, Bernhardt J, Johnson L. The energy cost of steady state physical activity in acute stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(4):1047–54.
Biswas A, Oh PI, Faulkner GE, Bajaj RR, Silver MA, Mitchell MS, et al. Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(2):123–32.
Barrett M, Snow JC, Kirkland MC, Kelly LP, Gehue M, Downer MB, et al. Excessive sedentary time during in-patient stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25(5):366–74.
Ezeugwu VE, Manns PJ. Sleep duration, sedentary behavior, physical activity, and quality of life after inpatient stroke rehabilitation. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(9):2004–12.
English C, Manns PJ, Tucak C, Bernhardt J. Physical activity and sedentary behaviors in people with stroke living in the community: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2014;94(2):185–96.
Ezeugwu VE, Manns PJ. Using intervention mapping to develop and implement a home-based sedentary behavior change intervention after stroke. Transl Behav Med. 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Stroke
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kramer, S.F., Hung, S.H. & Brodtmann, A. The Impact of Physical Activity Before and After Stroke on Stroke Risk and Recovery: a Narrative Review. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 19, 28 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-019-0949-4
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-019-0949-4