Abstract
Infection of implantable cardiac electronic devices in particular lead endocarditis (cardiac device infective endocarditis (CDIE)) is an emerging problem with significant morbidity, mortality and health care costs. The epidemiology is characterised with advanced age and health care association in cases presenting within 6 months of implantation. Risk factors include those of the patient, the procedure and the device. Staphylococcal species predominate as the causative organisms. Diagnosis is reliably made by blood cultures and transesophageal echocardiography. Complications include pulmonary and systemic emboli, persistent bacteremia and concomitant valvular involvement. Management includes complete device removal and prolonged antimicrobial therapy. With long-term follow-up to 1 year, the mortality of CDIE is as high as 23 %. It is associated with patient co-morbidities and concomitant valvular involvement and may be prevented by device removal during index admission.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The twenty-first century has seen improved patient outcomes and increasing indications for implanted cardiac devices, such as permanent pacemakers (PM) and defibrillators (implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs)) [1–6]. This has resulted in a steady increase of implantation globally [7]. In the USA alone, over 4 million devices were implanted between 1993 and 2008 with an increase in all devices; ICDs in particular have increased by over 500 % [8••]. This coupled with an ageing population has resulted in an unprecedented increase in cardiac device uptake [7, 8••, 9].
Infection of cardiac devices is a major emerging problem. It may range from a superficial generator pocket space infection through to a blood stream infection and lead endocarditis (cardiac device infective endocarditis (CDIE)). The reported rates of infection are increasing worldwide and vary significantly from centre and country. Most cardiac device infections involve the subcutaneous generator pocket with about 10–20 % resulting in CDIE. The incidence of CDIE has been reported between 0.06 and 0.6 % per year [10] or 1.14 per 1000 device years [11]. Utilising ICD coding in US health care services, there has been a 200 % increase in cardiac device (CD) infection from 2004 (1.5 %) to 2008 (2.4 %) (see Fig. 1). With the establishment of cardiac device registries in several countries, it is expected that infection incidence rates will be monitored more closely [12, https://www.ncdr.com/webncdr/icd/, 13]. Infection has been associated with a 1 % increase in overall mortality per decade, hospitalisation stay of an average of 14 days and cost estimates of US$150,000 per episode of infection [8••].
Epidemiology
The pathogenesis of CDIE primarily involves skin contamination at the time of implantation or in late-onset cases from hematogenous seeding during bacteremia [14–16]. Specific risk factors for infection have been defined and include those of the patient, the procedure and the device. Patient factors include age (median 71 years), male gender (74 %), low BMI, diabetes mellitus, anticoagulation, immunosuppression, skin disorders, presence of another focus of infection including surgical site and catheter-related blood stream infection. Procedural factors include operators with low annual procedure volume, prolonged procedure time, presence of hematoma, the number of procedures such as generator replacement compared to the first implantation and compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis. In terms of device characteristics, larger ICDs carry a higher risk of infection compared to smaller pacemaker systems [11, 14, 15, 17, 18••, 19].
The timing of CD procedures is significantly associated with either localised or systemic infection. Early infection occurring less than 6 months post-implantation is associated with percutaneous contamination at time of implantation. Early infection is often associated with localised generator pocket infection. Delayed-onset infection occurring greater than 6 months post-procedure is usually associated with systemic infection and lead endocarditis due to hematogenous seeding of leads in particular with Staphylococcus aureus in 38 % of cases [14, 20].
Health care association (HCA) is increasingly being recognised in all forms of infective endocarditis (IE) including CDIE [21, 22]. For CDIE, HCA is identified in about half of all cases [18••]. In CDIE, HCA is associated with a recent CD procedure, the presence of an intravascular device or hemodialysis. HCA CDIE is often caused by S. aureus (49 %), including MRSA (26 %), and is associated with persistent bacteremia. HCA is also independently associated with a poorer outcome in terms of both in-hospital (22 %) and 1-year mortality [18••].
Diagnosis
Clinical Features
The clinical features of CDIE are well characterised. Fever over 38.5 °C occurs in over 80 % of cases [18••, 23]. Localised generator site inflammation occurs in only 10–20 % of cases including erythema, swelling, fluctuance, tenderness, exudate and occasionally erosion or extrusion of the device.
Embolic episodes are documented frequently, in particular pulmonary, in between 10 and 27 % of cases given right heart involvement. Systemic emboli are reported in up to 14 % of cases [14, 16, 23]. Since in most published studies, embolic complications are not screened for routinely, by ventilation perfusion scan or CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), it is likely that they are underdiagnosed.
Precordial signs including heart murmurs may be present in cases of concomitant valvular involvement resulting in regurgitation or heart failure.
Investigations
Cultures
When blood cultures are performed, they provide a very high yield with positive growth identified in over 84 % of cases [14, 16, 23]. There is a significant yield from other sites such as lead cultures following device removal with significant growth obtained from between 50 and 90 % of cases, but contamination rates can be high [15]. When specimens are obtained from the generator site pocket, cultures are positive in up to 38 to 70 % in some studies [15, 19].
Echocardiography
The presence of vegetations on cardiac device leads is noted in most cases. Transthoracic echocardiography has a very poor sensitivity, as low as 23 % in identifying lead vegetations. Factors such as lead artefact and poor visualisation greatly limit its utility. Transesophageal echocardiography has sensitivity greater than 95 % with vegetations seen on the lead in over 76 % of cases of CDIE [14, 18••, 23, 24]. Echocardiography also has an important role in identifying concomitant valvular involvement or complications such as myocardial abscess and valvular regurgitation. A recent study comparing the use of intra-cardiac with transesophageal echocardiography in confirmed cases of CDIE reported excellent sensitivity for the detection of lead vegetations in CDIE [25].
Other Imaging
Ultrasound of generator pocket to delineate or guide drainage of an infected collection may also be of value. A recent pilot study of 21 cases of CD infection utilising positron-emission tomography (PET) CT found good sensitivity and specificity for generator pocket site infection but poor diagnostic utility for lead endocarditis [26].
Microbiology
In all studies of CDIE, staphylococcal species predominate as the pathogenic organism making up over 70 % of cases [14, 18••, 23, 24]. These consist of mainly S. aureus (35 %) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) species in about 32 % of cases. A significant proportion may also be methicillin resistant. The microbiology correlates with health care association, particularly in early CDIE. There are also reports of less common but virulent strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci such as Staphylococcus lugdunensis causing CDIE [27, 28]. Importantly, many of these organisms are known to produce biofilm, thus evading immune defences and making antimicrobial treatment less effective.
The remaining culture-confirmed cases of CDIE are made up of Enterococci, Viridans streptococci and some gram-negative bacteria. As diagnostic systems and culture methods continue to improve, there are increasing reports of emerging infections caused by Propionibacteria acnes, Candida species and other rare microorganisms [29–32].
Complications
CDIE may be complicated by embolic episodes. These are documented frequently, in particular septic pulmonary emboli, between 10 and 27 % cases given the right heart chamber involvement, and systemic emboli occur in up to 14 % of cases. Since in most published studies, embolic complications are not screened for routinely, by ventilation perfusion scan or CTPA, it is likely that they are under reported.
Persistent bacteremia is an important complication in any type of infective endocarditis. It is defined as bacteremia for greater than 72 hours despite appropriate antimicrobial therapy [18••, 33]. It is reported in over 15 % cases and is significantly associated with an increased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR) 5.0).
Concomitant valvular involvement has been reported in a significant number of cases of CDIE and should be actively investigated. The tricuspid valve is most frequently involved in up to 37 % of CDIE cases. The presence of concomitant valvular involvement is associated with a poorer outcome and an increased In-hospital mortality with OR 3.3 [18••].
Heart failure is reported in 15 % of CDIE cases. It is likely related to concomitant valvular involvement and is significantly associated with reduced in-hospital survival OR 3.1 [18••] .
Management
Surgery
There is general agreement that CDIE is optimally managed by complete removal or explantation of the electronic system. In most cases, this can be performed safely and effectively by percutaneous extraction using laser or other sheath traction devices. Complications of extraction are very uncommon but include pulmonary emboli and cardiac rupture. In cases of very large vegetations greater than 2 cm, open cardiotomy may be required; however, percutaneous methods may still be considered [34].
If replacement of the CD is essential, i.e., the patient is pacemaker dependent, this should be deferred until antimicrobial therapy is completed with temporary pacing if needed. This should be followed by placement at a new anatomical location including consideration for epicardial placement. When possible, we recommend a period of no antimicrobial therapy to assess the patient’s clinical cure before any device replacement. In cases of very frail patients, device removal may not be performed but is associated with high rates of relapse [14, 19, 23]. Cardiac device removal is associated with a significant survival benefit at 1-year follow-up (hazard ratio (HR) 0.42) (see Fig. 2) [18••, 23].
Antimicrobial Therapy
Following device removal, all cases should be treated with at least 14 days parenteral bactericidal antibiotics when the organism identification and susceptibilities are known. For most methicillin-susceptible strains, this includes flucloxacillin, nafcillin or a first-generation cephalosporin. For methicillin-resistant strains, glycopeptides including vancomycin or teicoplanin are recommended. Daptomycin, a synthetic cyclic lipopeptide approved for use in right-sided endocarditis, has also been used successfully in the treatment of CDIE [35] .
In cases of CDIE with concomitant valvular involvement, antimicrobial therapy should be modified as for native or prosthetic valve endocarditis with consideration for surgical management if indicated.
If the cardiac device is not removed, a prolonged course of combination therapy for 4 to 6 weeks including a biofilm active antibiotic such as rifampicin or ciprofloxacin is recommended and long-term suppression may be required.
Outcomes
Early in-hospital mortality ranges from as low as 7 % [17] or as high as 15 %. It is significantly associated with the presence of persistent bacteremia, heart failure, S. aureus, concomitant valvular involvement (OR 3.3) and health care association [18••, 23, 24, 36•] .
In long-term follow-up to 1 year, the mortality of CDIE is as high as 23 %. It is associated with patient co-morbidities and concomitant valvular involvement and may be prevented by device removal during index admission (HR 0.42) (see Fig. 2) [18••, 23, 36•].
Conclusion
The twenty-first century has seen an unprecedented increase in the uptake of implantable electronic cardiac devices globally. Unfortunately, this has been followed by an increasing rate of infection. The most serious form is lead endocarditis (CDIE). The epidemiology is characterised by advanced age and health care association and caused predominantly by staphylococcal species. The diagnosis is usually confirmed by blood culture and transesophageal echocardiography. The management is complex and involves appropriate antimicrobial therapy and complete removal of the system. Complications are common and include concomitant valvular involvement. Early in-hospital and 1-year mortality is high and improved by early device removal.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Jarcho JA. Biventricular pacing. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(3):288–94.
Tang ASL, Wells GA, Talajic M. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for mild-to-moderate heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2385–95.
Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, et al. Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1933–40.
Moss A, Zareba W, Hall W, for the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II Investigators, et al. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:877–83.
Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, for the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) Investigators. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter–defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:225–37.
Gold MR, Daubert JC, Abraham WT, et al. Implantable defibrillators improve survival in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: analysis of the long-term follow-up of remodeling in systolic left ventricular dysfunction (REVERSE). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(6):1163–8.
Kurtz SM, Ochoa JA, Lau E, et al. Implantation trends and patient profiles for pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in the United States: 1993–2006 pacing. Clin Electrophysiol. 2010;33(6):705–11.
Greenspon AJ, Patel JD Lau E, et al. 16 year trends in the infection burden for pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the United States 1993 to 2008. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(10):1001–006. This study analyses the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample discharge records for the infection burden and patient health profile during 1993 to 2008 reporting the incidence of CIED infection.
Cabell CH, Heidenreich PA, Chu VH, et al. Increasing rates of cardiac device infections among Medicare beneficiaries: 1990–1999. Am Heart J. 2004;147(4):582–6.
Uslan DZ, Sohail MR, Sauver JL, et al. Permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator infection: a population based study. Arch Int Med. 2007;167(7):669–75.
Duval X, Selton-Suty C, Alla F, et al. Endocarditis in patients with a permanent pacemaker: a 1 year epidemiological survey on infective endocarditis due to valvular and/or pacemaker infection. Clin Inf Dis. 2004;39:68–74.
Jernberg T, Attebring MF, Hambraeuset K, et al. The Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART) Cardiovascular registry. Heart. 2010;96:1617–621.
Kirkfeldt RE, Johansen JB, Nohr EA, et al. Complications after cardiac implantable electronic device implantations: an analysis of a complete nationwide cohort in Denmark. Europ Heart J. 2014;35:1186–94.
Greenspon AJ, Prutkin JM, Sohail MR, et al. Timing of the most recent device procedure influences the clinical outcome of lead-associated endocarditis: results of the MEDIC (Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Infection Cohort). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(7):681–7.
Didier Klug MD, Dominique Lacroix MD, Savoye C, et al. Systemic infection related to endocarditis on pacemaker leads clinical presentation and management. Circulation. 1997;95:2098–107.
Chambers ST. Diagnosis and management of staphylococcal infections of pacemakers and cardiac defibrillaotors. Int Med J. 2005;35:S63–71.
Catanchin A, Murdock CJ, Athan E. Pacemaker infections: a 10-year experience. Heart Lung Circ. 2007;16(6):434–9.
Athan E, Chu VH, Tattevin P, ICE-PCS Investigators. Clinical characteristics and outcome of infective endocarditis involving implantable cardiac devices. JAMA. 2012;307(16):1727–735. This contemporary worldwide cohort study characterises the clinical features and long-term outcomes of cardiac device infective endocarditis.
Chua JD, Wilkoff BL, Lee I, et al. Diagnosis and management of infections involving implantable eletrophysiologic cardiac devices. Ann Int Med. 2000;133(8):604–8.
Chamis AL, Peterson GE, Cabell CH, et al. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in patients with permanent pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Circulation. 2001;104(9):1029–33.
Wang A, Athan E, Pappas P, International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study Investigators, et al. Contemporary clinical profile and outcome of prosthetic valve endocarditis. JAMA. 2007;297:1354–361.
Fowler Jr VG, Miro JM, Hoen B, ICE investigators, et al. Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: a consequence of medical progress. JAMA. 2005;293(24):3012–021.
Massoure P, Reuter S, Lafitte S, et al. Pacemaker endocarditis: clinical features and management of 60 consecutive cases. Pacing Clin Eletrophysiol. 2007;30(1):12–9.
Sohail MR, Uslan DZ, Khan AH. Risk factor analysis of permanent pacemaker infection. Clin Inf Dis. 2007;45:166–73.
Narducci ML, Pelargonio G, Russo E, et al. Usefulness of intracardiac echocardiography for the diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device related endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(13):1398–405.
Cautela J, Alessandrini S, Cammilleri S, et al. Diagnostic yield of FDG positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with CEID infection: a pilot study. Europace. 2013;15(2):252–7.
Anguera I, Del Rio A, Miro JM, et al. Staphylococcus lugdunensis infective endocarditis: description of 10 cases and analysis of native valve, prosthetic valve and pacemaker lead endocarditis clinical profiles. Heart. 2005;91:e10.
Seifert H, Oltmanns D, Becker K, et al. Emerg Inf Dis. 2005;11(8):1283–6.
Noel W, Hammoudi N, Wegorowska E, et al. Pacemaker endocarditis caused by Propionibacterium acnes: a case report. Heart and Lung: J Acute and Crit Care. 2012;41(6):e21–23.
Ferrand J, Hadou T, Selton-Suty C, et al. Cardiac device-related endocarditis caused by Paenibacillus glucanolyticus. J Clin Micro. 2013;51(10):3439–442.
Pichlmaier M, Knigina L, Kuehn C, et al. The role of unusual bacterial species in infection of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED). Technol Healthcare. 2013;21(1):87–96.
Tascini C, Bongiorni MG, Tagliaferri E, et al. Micafungin for Candida albicans pacemaker-associated endocarditis: a case report and review of the literature. Mycopathologia. 2013;175(1–2):129–34.
Durack DT, Lukes AS, Bright DK. New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilisation of specific echocardiographic findings. Am J Med. 1994;96:200–9.
Perez BG, Gariglio L, Salvaggio F, et al. Transvenous extraction of pacemaker leads infective endocarditis with vegetations > 20 mm: our experience. Clin Cardiol. 2012;35(4):244–9.
Tumbarello M, Pelargonio G, Trecarichi EM, et al. High dose daptomycin for cardiac implantable electronic device related infective endocarditis caused by staphylococcal small colony variants. Clin Inf Dis. 2012;54(10):1516–7.
Habib A, Le KY, Baddour LM, et al. Predictors of mortality in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111(6):874–9. A retrospective analysis of patients with CIED infection. The development of CIED-related infective endocarditis and the presence of co-morbid conditions are associated with increased mortality.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
Eugene Athan has no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardiovascular Infections
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Athan, E. The Characteristics and Outcome of Infective Endocarditis Involving Implantable Cardiac Devices. Curr Infect Dis Rep 16, 446 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-014-0446-5
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-014-0446-5