Abstract
Purpose of Review
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) constitute the most frequently observed forms of autoimmune liver diseases. Each of these autoimmune liver diseases might present with cirrhosis at diagnosis, and a significant proportion of patients develop cirrhosis during follow-up. This manuscript provides a review that addresses how to monitor and manage patients with cirrhosis secondary to autoimmune liver diseases.
Recent Findings
For patients with PBC, the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist, obeticholic acid (OCA), is the first approved drug since ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and is licensed for non-responders to or those intolerant of UDCA. Bezafibrate has been shown to be effective in non-responders to UDCA, but is not licensed for this clinical indication at present. For patients with AIH, rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against the protein CD20 is a potential option for patients with suboptimal response to corticosteroids. New treatment options are currently being investigated for AIH and PSC that include the anti-B cell-activating factor receptor monoclonal antibodies, nor-UDCA, amongst others, but the efficacy in patients with cirrhosis has not been fully established.
Summary
Cirrhosis is present in 30–50% of patients at the time of diagnosis of AIH, in 20% of patients with PBC, and in 35% of patients with PSC. Therefore, cirrhosis constitutes one of the main complications of autoimmune liver disease and continues to develop at a frequency of approximately 3–6% per year. Patients with compensated AIH cirrhosis and histological inflammatory activity benefit of corticosteroid treatment. Patients with PBC and compensated cirrhosis should receive UDCA. OCA should be considered in non-responders but used with very close monitoring in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. There is no effective treatment option available for patients suffering from PSC. Liver transplantation is indicated for patients who have progressed to decompensated cirrhosis, and those with intractable symptoms or hepatocellular carcinoma within transplant criteria. Standard monitoring for cirrhosis-related complications is highly recommended.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Autoimmune Liver Diseases and Cirrhosis
Autoimmune liver diseases constitute a heterogeneous group of chronic liver disorders characterized by the development of parenchymal liver or biliary disease, associated with humoral and cellular immune response to “self” proteins. While autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) primarily affects the liver parenchyma [1•], primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic disease that leads to the progressive destruction of the intrahepatic bile ducts [2]; primarily sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is characterized by inflammation and fibrosis of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts [3•].
A significant proportion of patients with AIH under immunosuppressive treatment progress to liver cirrhosis. In patients with PBC, treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) can positively influence the progression of fibrosis, but in case of suboptimal treatment response, patients still have a considerable risk for the development of cirrhosis. There is no established treatment option for patients with PSC to control the disease and to prevent progression to cirrhosis. All autoimmune liver diseases, independent of their diagnosis, progress to cirrhosis.
For patients with compensated cirrhosis, disease-specific treatment should be continued in patients with AIH and PBC. For patients with PSC, no established specific treatment option is available. Management of complications is not disease-specific and follows general cirrhosis-related treatment guidelines. In all patients with autoimmune liver cirrhosis, screening for esophageal varices and for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is recommended (Table 1), even though the risk for HCC is lower in patients with AIH, PBC, and PSC-associated cirrhosis than in patients with cirrhosis due to other etiologies.
Liver transplant (LT) is an option for all patients with decompensated cirrhosis secondary to autoimmune liver disease and can be instituted in specific situations, such as refractory pruritus in patients with PBC or recurrent episodes of cholangitis in patients with PSC. In addition, LT is indicated in patients with acute liver failure due to AIH who do not respond to steroids and in patients with HCC that are within the general criteria for LT. In these patients, LT will lead to a substantial improvement of life expectancy and of quality of life. Nevertheless, all autoimmune liver disease can eventually recur after LT.
It is recommended that patients with decompensated autoimmune liver cirrhosis should be followed in tertiary care centers with access to LT as a life-saving treatment option.
New treatment options for patients with autoimmune liver diseases are currently being investigated in clinical trials, but data specific for patients with liver cirrhosis is limited. Accordingly, it is not clear whether investigational agents are available or of clinical benefit to positively impact the evolution of autoimmune liver diseases in this patient population.
Autoimmune Hepatitis
Epidemiology
Autoimmune hepatitis is a female-predominant chronic liver disease characterized by immune-mediated destruction of liver parenchyma, interface hepatitis in liver biopsy, high serum immunoglobulin G (IgG), and presence of autoantibodies [1•]. While AIH is a rare disease, a recent study reported a near doubling in incidence between 1994 and 2012, reaching a point prevalence of 24/100,000 (35/100,000 for females) [4]. AIH occurs in all ethnic groups and in all age groups. A bimodal distribution has been described, with a higher incidence between the second and the third, and the fourth and the sixth decades of life. A significant proportion of patients develop AIH after 60 years of age [4].
Cirrhosis in Autoimmune Hepatitis
About 30% of adults and 50% of children with AIH have cirrhosis at the time of diagnosis [5]. Patients with cirrhosis related to AIH may present with nonspecific symptoms such as malaise, weight loss, and right upper quadrant discomfort or as acute exacerbation of chronic AIH [1•]. Patients presenting with acute disease with histological confirmation of cirrhosis likely suffered from preexisting, subclinical AIH for a considerable period. Patients may also present with decompensated cirrhosis or with complications of portal hypertension including ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, esophageal varices, and low platelet count.
The annual rate of progression to cirrhosis in patients without cirrhosis at diagnosis ranges considerably from 3 up to 40% of treated patients with AIH over time [6]. A recent study showed that AIH presenting as acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is not uncommon. In this setting, a low threshold for liver biopsy is important to corroborate the diagnosis, as nearly half of these patients with AIH can be seronegative [7•].
Patients with AIH cirrhosis have a reported risk of HCC ranging from 1 to 6% during follow-up [8, 9], with a 10-year probability of developing HCC of approximately 3%, which is significantly lower compared to most other etiologies of cirrhosis. The risk of developing HCC is higher in male patients, patients with immunosuppressive treatment for at least 3 years and with cirrhosis for at least 10 years [9].
Risk Factors for the Development of Cirrhosis
African-American patients more commonly have cirrhosis at diagnosis of AIH [10]. Also, patients younger than 20 or older than 60 years, and males have a higher risk of cirrhosis at diagnosis (Table 2). Low serum albumin concentration, prolonged INR, and low platelet count are predictors of cirrhosis at the time of diagnosis for patients with AIH [11].
Progression to cirrhosis during treatment has been associated with HLA DR3/DR4 and worsening of the histological activity index in the liver biopsy [12]. The risk of progression to cirrhosis is higher in patients who have several relapses compared to those with sustained remission after their first treatment [13]. Lack of complete normalization of AST, ALT, and IgG within 1 year of treatment has also been associated with higher risk of cirrhosis [14]. Recently, we described that severe vitamin D deficiency (< 25 nmol/L) increases the risk of developing cirrhosis in patients with AIH. In addition, patients with persistent deficiency following vitamin D supplementation usually continue to have poor outcomes [15].
Treatment in Patients with AIH Cirrhosis
The main objective of corticosteroid therapy in AIH (Fig. 1) is to decrease liver injury, to prevent or revert fibrosis, and to enhance overall and LT-free survival. Treatment guidelines have evolved over time as compared to older recommendations, when improvement of AST and ALT below two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) were acceptable. Current guidelines recommend complete normalization of liver enzymes (AST, ALT) and IgG. Furthermore, a treatment duration for three or more years and normalization of liver biopsy findings before drug withdrawal are recommended [5]. Indeed, some patients’ histological activity persists even if ALT and AST levels are normal [16].
Reduction in liver fibrosis and reversal of cirrhosis in AIH have been described in studies using protocol liver biopsies [17, 18••]. The first study demonstrating this finding was a retrospective analysis of paired liver biopsies from 28 patients who received treatment with prednisolone ± azathioprine. Improvement of hepatic fibrosis was observed in 57% and in 9 of 14 patients (64%) cirrhosis resolved after treatment. Regression of fibrosis was associated with the suppression of liver inflammation. These findings justified the recommendation that corticosteroid therapy be started early after diagnosis [19]. In another study of 87 treated AIH patients, histological cirrhosis disappeared in 8 of 14 patients with cirrhosis at presentation [18••]. Based on these findings, treatment of AIH patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis is important and should be considered in all patients, if not contraindicated due to comorbidities.
Cirrhosis at diagnosis has been described as a factor associated with lower overall and LT-free survival [20]. However, a population-based study from New Zealand demonstrated that histological cirrhosis at diagnosis was not associated with poor prognosis and did not influence the response to initial corticosteroid treatment [11]. Similarly, a Chinese study reported the efficacy of initial corticosteroid treatment in patients with cirrhosis is comparable to that in those without cirrhosis. Importantly, patients with cirrhosis that were not treated had poor long-term outcomes [21]. Improvement of fibrosis after corticosteroid treatment might explain previous findings of similar survival rates between patients with and without cirrhosis at diagnosis [11].
For induction of remission, prednisone or prednisolone should be started between 0.5 and 1 mg/kg/day and consecutively tapered down. Azathioprine (AZA) in a low dose of 1 mg/kg/day [22] can be used as steroid sparing agent. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a treatment option for patients intolerant of AZA [23]. Importantly, AZA or MMF should be avoided in patients with severe cytopenia, with white blood cell counts below 2.5 × 109/L or platelet counts below 50 × 109/L.
Budesonide, a corticosteroid with a high first pass elimination by the liver, should not be used in patients with AIH cirrhosis, as a decrease of the metabolic function of the liver leads to increased plasma levels and its use in cirrhosis is associated with risk of portal vein thrombosis [24].
Overall, patients with decompensated AIH cirrhosis have more drug-induced side effects because of hypoalbuminemia, hyperbilirubinemia, and portosystemic shunting that can affect protein-binding and disposition of free prednisolone [25].
Patients with difficult to control diabetes, osteoporosis and vertebral compression fractures, or psychosis must be evaluated case by case for treatment benefit before the administration of corticosteroids [5, 26]. In general, treatment is not indicated in patients with AIH cirrhosis without histologic signs of inflammation on biopsy (burned out cirrhosis), as there is no benefit in overall outcomes [27].
We recommend measuring vitamin D levels in all patients with AIH and supplementation of vitamin D in case of deficiency [15].
Primary Biliary Cholangitis
Epidemiology
Primary biliary cholangitis predominantly affects female patients and patients who are typically older than 40 years. PBC does not present in childhood and the prevalence of PBC in women over the age of 40 years is estimated at 1 in 1000 [28].
Cirrhosis in Primary Biliary Cholangitis
Primary biliary cholangitis is characterized histologically by immune-mediated destruction of the interlobular bile ducts. Currently, most patients with diagnosis of PBC are asymptomatic at presentation and do not need a liver biopsy to establish diagnosis. Up to 23% may have evidence of cirrhosis at diagnosis [29]. Older studies suggest that most patients suffering from PBC have a chronic progressive course of the disease with an increase of the stage of fibrosis over time. For example, progression from early stage disease to extensive fibrosis has been reported in 34% of patients without treatment, whereas patients treated with UDCA had a significantly reduced risk for progression of approximately 7% [30]. Patients with stage I histology demonstrating inflammation limited to the portal space and stage II with inflammation involving periportal areas as well showed progression to cirrhosis in 31% and 50%, respectively, in the absence of treatment [31]. In contrast, regression of fibrosis stage is seen only in a minority of patients (3% per year), independent of treatment with UDCA or without treatment [30].
Risk Factors for the Development of Cirrhosis
Risk assessment for patients with PBC was introduced in 1983 with the Yale model that identified elevated serum bilirubin, age, hepatomegaly, and advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis as independent predictors of poor prognosis [32]. With the introduction of the Mayo score, risk could be predicted without the need of a liver biopsy. Risk factors included age, serum bilirubin and albumin, prothrombin time, and severity of edema. More recently, a meta-analysis of data from almost 5000 PBC patients demonstrated that levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and bilirubin can predict outcomes and could be used as surrogate end-points in therapy trials [33].
The main risk factor for development of cirrhosis (Table 2) is inadequate response to treatment to UDCA, and several binary scores have been developed to predict prognosis [30, 34,35,36,37,38,39]. Recently, dimensional scoring systems such as the GLOBE [40•] and the UK-PBC scores [42] have been developed and validated, and these should preferentially be used in clinical practice. Notably, a younger age at presentation, less than 50, not only predicts a more rapid disease process as compared to older patients but also increased risk of recurrent disease following liver transplantation [43].
Treatment in Patients with Cirrhosis
UDCA
Independent of the stage of disease, the first-line treatment of PBC is UDCA in patients with biochemical cholestasis (Fig. 1). However, response to treatment is more favorable in earlier stages. The optimal treatment dose is 13 to 15 mg/kg/day, usually given in two doses. Treatment with UDCA is associated with improved liver biochemistries and LT-free survival. Furthermore, UDCA reduces serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, the risk for esophageal varices, and histologic progression, whereas pruritus and fatigue are not affected [44].
Obeticholic Acid
Obeticholic acid (OCA) is currently licensed as second-line treatment for patients with inadequate response or intolerance to UDCA, defined as ALP ≥ 1.67 ULN after 1 year of UDCA treatment. In a long-term clinical impact and cost-effectiveness analysis, combined treatment with UDCA and OCA was determined to decrease the 15-year cumulative incidences of decompensated cirrhosis (12.2 to 4.5%), HCC (9.1 to 4.0%), and liver-related death (16.2 to 5.7%) and to increase the 15-year LT-free survival from 61.1 to 72.9% [45].
In patients with Child–Pugh A cirrhosis, OCA should be prescribed in a dose of 5 mg/day, whereas in patients with Child–Pugh B or C or prior decompensation the recommended dose is 5 mg/week for the first 3 months of treatment. OCA may then be increased to 5 mg two times per week, to a maximum of 10 mg twice a week. So far, OCA has not been investigated in detail in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Taking into account a warning issued by the Food and Drug Administration in September 2017, the use of OCA in patients with decompensated cirrhosis outside the context of clinical trials is currently not recommended [44].
Fibrates
Fibrates are activators of the peroxisome proliferator activator receptor (PPAR), a nuclear receptor with the three subtypes α, δ, and ϒ. PPAR α is involved in the regulation of bile acid synthesis and detoxification, but PPAR-ϒ may also have a beneficial effect regarding cholestasis in patients with PBC. Currently, fibrates are only approved as lipid-lowering agents. Bezafibrate, a pan-PPAR agonist, was recently reported to be effective in lowering hepatic biochemistry in a multicenter clinical trial in patients with inadequate response to UDCA. In addition to 67% of patients normalizing ALT, subjects treated with bezafibrate also had an improvement in pruritus and elastography measurements. Of patients included, 54% had an advanced stage of disease with bridging fibrosis (Ludwig stage 3) or cirrhosis (Ludwig stage 4). In patients with cirrhosis, no significant increase in total bilirubin was observed compared to the placebo group. Since a high ALP and portal hypertension were identified as baseline risk factors for treatment failure, patients with severe cholestasis and advanced cirrhosis may not be ideal candidates for this treatment [46••].
New Options
Drugs under evaluation for PBC therapy include selective PPAR-δ agonists (seladelpar) [47] and non-steroidal FXR agonists, but currently there is not sufficient evidence to recommend their use in patients with PBC-related cirrhosis.
Pruritus
Pruritus is a frequent symptom in patients with PBC that negatively affects quality of life. Several pathophysiological mechanisms have been characterized including a role of bile acids, endogenous opioids [48], and lysophosphatidic acid [49], explaining the mode of action of treatment with bile acid sequestrants, opioid antagonists, and rifampicin. Cholestyramine is a non-absorbable resin that is normally used as first-line therapy, at a dose of 4–8 g twice a day, given 2–4 h before or after other medications (UDCA or OCA) as they interfere with intestinal absorption. Rifampicin at a dose of 150–300 mg/day is a second-line treatment. However, monitoring liver biochemistries is recommended during its use as there is a risk of hepatotoxicity. Opiate antagonists (naltrexone) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (sertraline) could be used as a third-line therapy [28].
Prophylactic Measures
Bone mineral density should be measured every 2 years, since the risk for osteopenia and osteoporosis is increased in patients with PBC and the severity of liver disease correlates with the severity of bone disease [50]. In patients with cholestasis, monitoring of fat-soluble vitamins is recommended [44].
Prognosis
In the UDCA era, LT-free survival determined using the GLOBE score is calculated at 90%, 77.5%, and 65.6% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively [42]. In the UK-PBC risk score analysis, overall event free survival after 5, 10, and 15 years was determined to be 96%, 89%, and 86% with events defined as liver-related death, LT or first bilirubin ≥ 100 μmol/L [40•]. In this analysis with a median follow-up of 6.3 years and a total of 23,673 patient-years, 260 patients had a LT (8.2%) and 31 patients (1%) died due to liver-related disease. Whereas the overall progression of fibrosis is relatively slow in patients with F3 or below, in patients with cirrhosis, the liver stiffness increases significantly over 5 years. An increase of 2.1 kPa/year in transient elastography has been associated with an 8.4-fold increased risk in liver decompensation, LT, and death [51].
Risk for and Treatment of Cancer
Patients with PBC have a slightly increased risk for HCC compared to the general population. Risk factors are male gender and advanced disease as well as suboptimal response to UDCA. Screening for HCC with ultrasound or a cross-sectional imaging technique is recommended every 6 months [44]. Treatment of HCC is similar as in cirrhosis due to other etiologies.
Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Epidemiology
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic liver disease characterized by multifocal bile duct strictures and progressive liver fibrosis. Most patients have coexistence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PSC has a prevalence of up to 16.2 per 100,000 population and is classified as a rare disease. The prevalence is highest in northern Europe and low in Asia [3•] and two thirds of patients affected are male. Time from diagnosis until LT or PSC-related death was 13.2 years in a transplant centers analysis and 21.3 years in a community base survival analysis [52].
Risk Factors for the Development of Cirrhosis
Several prognostic models have been established for patients with PSC. The Mayo score integrates age, bilirubin, AST, and albumin as well as history of variceal bleeding in a prognostic model to assign patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups [53]. A recent study from a large international cohort of patients with PSC demonstrated that older age at diagnosis was associated with significantly lower LT-free survival, whereas female sex, Crohn’s disease (relative to ulcerative colitis), and small duct PSC (relative to classical PSC) were identified as being protective [54••].
Pharmacologic Treatment in Patients with Cirrhosis
To date, there is no established medical treatment for patients with PSC. UDCA in a dose of 13 to 15 mg/kg/day has been shown to improve serum liver parameters, but had no effect on symptoms or clinical significant outcomes, such as histologic progression, LT, or liver-related death [55]. Treatment with a higher dose (28 to 30 mg/kg/day) was also associated with biochemical improvement but the study was stopped prematurely because of an enhanced risk of LT or serious adverse events, especially in patients with advanced disease [56].
The use of corticosteroids or alternative immunosuppressive agents is not associated with an improvement in outcome or disease activity [57]. However, in patients with elevated serum IgG4 (> 140 mg/dL) immunosuppression with prednisone/prednisolone may be a treatment option if IgG4-associated cholangiopathy cannot be excluded.
Treatment of IBD is performed according to standard treatment guidelines. In patients with decompensated cirrhosis, pharmacokinetic alteration, and especially a decreased first pass effect have to be taken into account, as this can lead to a significant increase of systemic exposition to drugs (i.e., budesonide) [25].
Non-pharmacologic Treatment in Patients with Cirrhosis
Dominant strictures of the biliary tract defined as a stenosis with a diameter of ≤ 1.5 mm in the common bile duct and/or ≤ 1.0 mm in a hepatic duct within 2 cm of the main hepatic confluence should be evaluated for malignancy with ductal sampling with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (brush cytology, biliary biopsies). Dominant strictures should be treated with endoscopic balloon dilatation, preferentially without performing plastic stent insertion [58•, 59•]. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary accesses are alternative treatment options in patients with failed crossing of strictures during ERCP [60].
Prophylactic Measures
Bone mineral density examination is recommended at diagnosis and thereafter in 2–3 years intervals, since osteoporosis is found in 4 to 10% of patients with PSC. Treatment with calcium, vitamin D, and bisphosphonates is recommended according to general guidelines. In patients with esophageal varices, a parenteral bisphosphonate should be used [57]. In patients with PSC and recurrent bacterial cholangitis, prophylactic rotating antibiotics may be indicated [60].
Prognosis
Asymptomatic patients with PSC have a better prognosis than patients with symptoms, but may become symptomatic over time [60, 61]. The Mayo PSC risk score utilizes the patient age, bilirubin, albumin, AST, and a prior history of variceal bleeding and was developed to predict short-term mortality [62]. More recently, the PSC risk estimate tool (PREsTo) has been used to predict decompensation and is reportedly more accurate than MELD score, Mayo PSC risk score, and ALP < 1.5× ULN [63•].
PSC and Cancer
Patients with PSC have an increased risk for the development of a cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), with a cumulative 10-year incidence between 7 and 9%. Several risk factors for the development of a CCA have been identified, such as elevated bilirubin, proctocolectomy, variceal bleeding, chronic ulcerative colitis with colorectal cancer or dysplasia, the duration of IBD, and polymorphisms of the natural killer cell receptor G2D (NKG2D) gene [57, 64]. Patients with PSC also have a 5-fold higher risk for the development of colorectal cancer compared to patients with IBD without PSC, warranting regular surveillance colonoscopy from the time of diagnosis [60, 65]. In contrast, the risk for HCC seems to be lower than in patients with cirrhosis of other etiologies [66].
General Considerations Regarding Management of Patients with Cirrhosis Due To Autoimmune Liver Disease
HCC Screening
Screening for HCC is recommended in all patients with cirrhosis independent of the etiology of the liver disease (Table 1), with ultrasound (US) every 6 months or a cross-sectional image technique suitable for the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions [67, 68].
Screening for Esophageal Varices
Patients with cirrhosis should be screened with upper endoscopy for esophageal varices every 2 to 3 years [69]. In patients with PSC, screening for esophageal varices should also be performed in non-cirrhotic patients with signs for portal hypertension [3•, 70].
Liver Transplantation in Autoimmune Liver Disease
Liver transplantation is a treatment option for all patients with autoimmune liver disease progressing to decompensated cirrhosis with a MELD score of ≥ 15 and for patients presenting with HCC within transplant criteria. In addition, patients with intractable pruritus (PBC) or chronic recurrent cholangitis (PSC) should be consider for LT, given that local and general criteria for LT are fulfilled [44, 71].
Follow-Up After LT
Autoimmune liver diseases may eventually recur after LT. In patients with AIH, optimal disease control prior to LT as well as maintenance treatment with low-dose steroids is associated with a reduced risk of recurrence [72, 73]. The risk for recurring PBC might be reduced with continuing treatment with UDCA post-LT, but this data needs to be confirmed in prospective studies [74]. For patients with PSC, so far no treatment option has been identified that influences the risk for recurrence. Re-transplant is a treatment option for all autoimmune liver diseases.
Future Directions
New Treatment Options
For patients with PBC, FXR agonists are a new treatment class and OCA is the first molecule of this group that has been approved for non-responders to UDCA. Others FXR agonists are still in clinical testing. Although the label of OCA includes patients with cirrhosis, these new treatments need further in-depth evaluation in patients with decompensated cirrhosis [75••].
Currently, norursodeoxycholic acid is investigated in patients with PSC and available results show a significant reduction of ALP with this compound [76•]. These results need further confirmation and data in cirrhosis is currently lacking.
Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody against the CD20 antigen on the B cell surface. Treatment with two doses of 1000 mg IV 2 weeks apart was well tolerated in 22 patients with treatment-resistant type 1 AIH and none of those patients required termination of therapy or stated any side effects [77], but evidence in cirrhosis is needed. Anti-B cell-activating factor receptor (anti-Baff-R) monoclonal antibodies have been tested in Sjögren’s disease [78] and a clinical trial in patients with AIH is currently ongoing (A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of ianalumab [VAY736] in Autoimmune Hepatitis (AMBER), ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03217422). Whether this treatment could become a future treatment option for AIH cirrhosis is not yet known.
Conclusions
Autoimmune liver cirrhosis is a descriptive term addressing chronic advanced liver disease due to one out of several distinct autoimmune liver diseases. Autoimmune liver diseases may progress to compensated and finally decompensated cirrhosis, as a common pathway; however, each of the autoimmune liver diseases is associated with a distinct epidemiology, clinical phenotype, response to treatment, and evolution over time. In patients with AIH, development of cirrhosis can be prevented with optimal corticosteroid treatment. In the case of established cirrhosis, inflammatory activity should be treated, but a balance between optimal immunosuppression and the risk for complications has to be considered. Patients with PBC cirrhosis should continue treatment with UDCA, although UDCA is more effective in earlier stages of the disease. For PSC, no disease-specific treatment is available to date. Cirrhosis-associated complications are treated according to general guidelines for compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. Screening for esophageal varices and for HCC is recommended independent of the etiology of liver disease. Additional screening measures should be considered based on the etiology of cirrhosis, i.e., screening for CCA.
Liver transplant should be considered for all patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to autoimmune liver disease and may be considered for disease-specific complications, such as refractory pruritus in PBC and recurrent cholangitis in PSC. However, all autoimmune liver diseases may recur after LT.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
• Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D, Czaja AJ, Manns MP, Krawitt EL, Vierling JM, et al. Autoimmune hepatitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:18017 The authors review the current literature of autoimmune hepatitis from pathophysiology to novel treatment appoaches.
Selmi C, Bowlus CL, Gershwin ME, Coppel RL. Primary biliary cirrhosis. Lancet. 2011;377:1600–9.
• Dyson JK, Beuers U, Jones DEJ, Lohse AW, Hudson M. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. Lancet. 2018;391:2547–59 This is a recent comprehensive review summarizing the current knowledge in primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Gronbaek L, Vilstrup H, Jepsen P. Autoimmune hepatitis in Denmark: incidence, prevalence, prognosis, and causes of death. A nationwide registry-based cohort study. J Hepatol. 2014;60:612–7.
European Association for the Study of the L. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol. 2015;63:971–1004.
Roberts SK, Therneau TM, Czaja AJ. Prognosis of histological cirrhosis in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis. Gastroenterology. 1996;110:848–57.
• Anand L, Choudhury A, Bihari C, Sharma BC, Kumar M, Maiwall R, et al. Flare of autoimmune hepatitis causing acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF): diagnosis and response to corticosteroid therapy. Hepatology. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.30205 In this study, the concept of acute-on-chronic liver failure is introduced to patients with autoimmune hepatitis from the Asia-Pacific region.
Yeoman AD, Al-Chalabi T, Karani JB, Quaglia A, Devlin J, Mieli-Vergani G, et al. Evaluation of risk factors in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in autoimmune hepatitis: implications for follow-up and screening. Hepatology. 2008;48:863–70.
Montano-Loza AJ, Carpenter HA, Czaja AJ. Predictive factors for hepatocellular carcinoma in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1944–51.
Verma S, Torbenson M, Thuluvath PJ. The impact of ethnicity on the natural history of autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology. 2007;46:1828–35.
Ngu JH, Gearry RB, Frampton CM, Stedman CA. Predictors of poor outcome in patients with autoimmune hepatitis: a population-based study. Hepatology. 2013;57:2399–406.
Czaja AJ, Carpenter HA. Progressive fibrosis during corticosteroid therapy of autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology. 2004;39:1631–8.
Montano-Loza AJ, Carpenter HA, Czaja AJ. Consequences of treatment withdrawal in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis. Liver Int. 2007;27:507–15.
Czaja AJ. Rapidity of treatment response and outcome in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol. 2009;51:161–7.
Ebadi M, Bhanji RA, Mazurak VC, Lytvyak E, Mason A, Czaja AJ, et al. Severe vitamin D deficiency is a prognostic biomarker in autoimmune hepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019;49:173–182.
Dhaliwal HK, Hoeroldt BS, Dube AK, McFarlane E, Underwood JC, Karajeh MA, et al. Long-term prognostic significance of persisting histological activity despite biochemical remission in autoimmune hepatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:993–9.
Cotler SJ, Jakate S, Jensen DM. Resolution of cirrhosis in autoimmune hepatitis with corticosteroid therapy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;32:428–30.
•• Czaja AJ, Carpenter HA. Decreased fibrosis during corticosteroid therapy of autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol. 2004;40:646–52 This study demonstrates the potential reversibility of cirrhosis in autoimmune hepatitis patients treated with corticosteroids.
Schvarcz R, Glaumann H, Weiland O. Survival and histological resolution of fibrosis in patients with autoimmune chronic active hepatitis. J Hepatol. 1993;18:15–23.
Kirstein MM, Metzler F, Geiger E, Heinrich E, Hallensleben M, Manns MP, et al. Prediction of short- and long-term outcome in patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology. 2015;62:1524–35.
Li YN, Ma H, Zhou L, Zhang J, Guo LP, Li SQ, et al. Autoimmune hepatitis-related cirrhosis: clinical features and effectiveness of immunosuppressive treatment in Chinese patients. Chin Med J. 2016;129:2434–40.
Lamers MM, van Oijen MG, Pronk M, Drenth JP. Treatment options for autoimmune hepatitis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Hepatol. 2010;53:191–8.
Efe C, Hagstrom H, Ytting H, Bhanji RA, Muller NF, Wang Q, et al. Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus as second-line therapy for patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15:1950–6.
Hempfling W, Grunhage F, Dilger K, Reichel C, Beuers U, Sauerbruch T. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic action of budesonide in early- and late-stage primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2003;38:196–202.
Czaja AJ. Safety issues in the management of autoimmune hepatitis. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2008;7:319–33.
Manns MP, Czaja AJ, Gorham JD, Krawitt EL, Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D, et al. Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology. 2010;51:2193–213.
Feld JJ, Dinh H, Arenovich T, Marcus VA, Wanless IR, Heathcote EJ. Autoimmune hepatitis: effect of symptoms and cirrhosis on natural history and outcome. Hepatology. 2005;42:53–62.
European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address eee, European Association for the Study of the L. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: the diagnosis and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2017;67:145–72.
Kanth R, Shrestha RB, Rai I, VanWormer JJ, Roy PK. Incidence of primary biliary cholangitis in a rural Midwestern population. Clin Med Res. 2017;15:13–8.
Corpechot C, Carrat F, Bonnand AM, Poupon RE, Poupon R. The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid therapy on liver fibrosis progression in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2000;32:1196–9.
Locke GR 3rd, Therneau TM, Ludwig J, Dickson ER, Lindor KD. Time course of histological progression in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1996;23:52–6.
Roll J, Boyer JL, Barry D, Klatskin G. The prognostic importance of clinical and histologic features in asymptomatic and symptomatic primary biliary cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:1–7.
Lammers WJ, van Buuren HR, Hirschfield GM, Janssen HL, Invernizzi P, Mason AL, et al. Levels of alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin are surrogate end points of outcomes of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: an international follow-up study. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:1338–49.
Angulo P, Lindor KD, Therneau TM, Jorgensen RA, Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, et al. Utilization of the Mayo risk score in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis receiving ursodeoxycholic acid. Liver. 1999;19:115–21.
Pares A, Caballeria L, Rodes J. Excellent long-term survival in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:715–20.
Kuiper EM, Hansen BE, de Vries RA, den Ouden-Muller JW, van Ditzhuijsen TJ, Haagsma EB, et al. Improved prognosis of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis that have a biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1281–7.
Kumagi T, Guindi M, Fischer SE, Arenovich T, Abdalian R, Coltescu C, et al. Baseline ductopenia and treatment response predict long-term histological progression in primary biliary cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2186–94.
Corpechot C, Chazouilleres O, Poupon R. Early primary biliary cirrhosis: biochemical response to treatment and prediction of long-term outcome. J Hepatol. 2011;55:1361–7.
Azemoto N, Abe M, Murata Y, Hiasa Y, Hamada M, Matsuura B, et al. Early biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid predicts symptom development in patients with asymptomatic primary biliary cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:630–4.
• Carbone M, Sharp SJ, Flack S, Paximadas D, Spiess K, Adgey C, et al. The UK-PBC risk scores: derivation and validation of a scoring system for long-term prediction of end-stage liver disease in primary biliary cholangitis. Hepatology. 2016;63:930–50 This study reports the validation of one of the most important prognostic score for patients with primary biliary cholangitis.
Lammers WJ, Hirschfield GM, Corpechot C, Nevens F, Lindor KD, Janssen HL, et al. Development and validation of a scoring system to predict outcomes of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis receiving ursodeoxycholic acid therapy. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:1804–12 e1804.
Montano-Loza AJ, Hansen BE, Corpechot C, Roccarina D, Thorburn D, Trivedi P, et al. Factors associated with recurrence of primary biliary cholangitis after liver transplantation and effects on graft and patient survival. Gastroenterology. 2018;156:96–107.e1. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.001.
Lindor KD, Bowlus CL, Boyer J, Levy C, Mayo M. Primary biliary cholangitis: 2018 Practice Guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2019;69:394–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.30145.
Samur S, Klebanoff M, Banken R, Pratt DS, Chapman R, Ollendorf DA, et al. Long-term clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of obeticholic acid for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis. Hepatology. 2017;65:920–8.
•• Corpechot C, Chazouilleres O, Rousseau A, Le Gruyer A, Habersetzer F, Mathurin P, et al. A placebo-controlled trial of bezafibrate in primary biliary cholangitis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2171–81 This study reports the results of the phase 3 bezafibrate trial in patients with primary biliary cholangitis and suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid.
Jones D, Boudes PF, Swain MG, Bowlus CL, Galambos MR, Bacon BR, et al. Seladelpar (MBX-8025), a selective PPAR-delta agonist, in patients with primary biliary cholangitis with an inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2, proof-of-concept study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2:716–26.
Jones EA, Bergasa NV. The pruritus of cholestasis: from bile acids to opiate agonists. Hepatology. 1990;11:884–7.
Kremer AE, van Dijk R, Leckie P, Schaap FG, Kuiper EM, Mettang T, et al. Serum autotaxin is increased in pruritus of cholestasis, but not of other origin, and responds to therapeutic interventions. Hepatology. 2012;56:1391–400.
Menon KV, Angulo P, Weston S, Dickson ER, Lindor KD. Bone disease in primary biliary cirrhosis: independent indicators and rate of progression. J Hepatol. 2001;35:316–23.
Corpechot C, Carrat F, Poujol-Robert A, Gaouar F, Wendum D, Chazouilleres O, et al. Noninvasive elastography-based assessment of liver fibrosis progression and prognosis in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2012;56:198–208.
Boonstra K, Weersma RK, van Erpecum KJ, Rauws EA, Spanier BW, Poen AC, et al. Population-based epidemiology, malignancy risk, and outcome of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2013;58:2045–55.
Kim WR, Poterucha JJ, Wiesner RH, LaRusso NF, Lindor KD, Petz J, et al. The relative role of the Child-Pugh classification and the Mayo natural history model in the assessment of survival in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 1999;29:1643–8.
•• Weismuller TJ, Trivedi PJ, Bergquist A, Imam M, Lenzen H, Ponsioen CY, et al. Patient age, sex, and inflammatory bowel disease phenotype associate with course of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:1975–84 In this publication, the International Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) Study Group reports on factors associated with the course of PSC.
Lindor KD. Ursodiol for primary sclerosing cholangitis. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:691–5.
Lindor KD, Kowdley KV, Luketic VA, Harrison ME, McCashland T, Befeler AS, et al. High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid for the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2009;50:808–14.
Chapman R, Fevery J, Kalloo A, Nagorney DM, Boberg KM, Shneider B, et al. Diagnosis and management of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2010;51:660–78.
Ponsioen CY, Arnelo U, Bergquist A, Rauws EA, Paulsen V, Cantu P, et al. No superiority of stents vs balloon dilatation for dominant strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:752–9.
• Aabakken L, Karlsen TH, Albert J, Arvanitakis M, Chazouilleres O, Dumonceau J-M, et al. Role of endoscopy in primary sclerosing cholangitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Clinical Guideline. J Hepatol. 2017;66:1265–81 This review summarizes the current role of endoscopy in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Karlsen TH, Folseraas T, Thorburn D, Vesterhus M. Primary sclerosing cholangitis—a comprehensive review. J Hepatol. 2017;67:1298–323.
Wiesner RH, Grambsch PM, Dickson ER, Ludwig J, MacCarty RL, Hunter EB, et al. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: natural history, prognostic factors and survival analysis. Hepatology. 1989;10:430–6.
Kim WR, Therneau TM, Wiesner RH, Poterucha JJ, Benson JT, Malinchoc M, et al. A revised natural history model for primary sclerosing cholangitis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:688–94.
• Eaton JE, Vesterhus M, McCauley BM, Atkinson EJ, Schlicht EM, Juran BD, et al. Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Risk Estimate Tool (PREsTo) predicts outcomes of the Disease: a derivation and validation study using machine learning. Hepatology. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.30085 The authors of this publication present the a novel risk estimation tool to assess the outcome of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Burak K, Angulo P, Pasha TM, Egan K, Petz J, Lindor KD. Incidence and risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:523–6.
Soetikno RM, Lin OS, Heidenreich PA, Young HS, Blackstone MO. Increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:48–54.
Zenouzi R, Weismuller TJ, Hubener P, Schulze K, Bubenheim M, Pannicke N, et al. Low risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1733–8.
European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address eee, European Association for the Study of the L. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69:182–236.
Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, Sirlin CB, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018;67:358–80.
de Franchis R, Baveno VIF. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015;63:743–52.
Zein CO, Lindor KD, Angulo P. Prevalence and predictors of esophageal varices in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2004;39:204–10.
Murray KF, Carithers RL Jr, AASLD. AASLD practice guidelines: evaluation of the patient for liver transplantation. Hepatology. 2005;41:1407–32.
Montano-Loza AJ, Mason AL, Ma M, Bastiampillai RJ, Bain VG, Tandon P. Risk factors for recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2009;15:1254–61.
Krishnamoorthy TL, Miezynska-Kurtycz J, Hodson J, Gunson BK, Neuberger J, Milkiewicz P, et al. Longterm corticosteroid use after liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis is safe and associated with a lower incidence of recurrent disease. Liver Transpl. 2016;22:34–41.
Bosch A, Dumortier J, Maucor Boulch D, Conti F, Morard I, Rubbia-Brandt L, et al. P1148: long-term administration of ursodeoxycholic acid prevents recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis after liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2015;62:S783.
•• Nevens F, Andreone P, Mazzella G, Strasser SI, Bowlus C, Invernizzi P, et al. A placebo-controlled trial of obeticholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:631–43 The use of obeticholic acid in patients with primary biliary cholangitis and suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid is investigated in this phase 3 clinical trial.
• Fickert P, Hirschfield GM, Denk G, Marschall HU, Altorjay I, Farkkila M, et al. Norursodeoxycholic acid improves cholestasis in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2017;67:549–58 This study reports the results of a clinical phase 2 trial with norursodeoxycholic acid as a novel treatment option for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Than NN, Schmidt D, Hodson J, Wawman R, Burak K, Botter M, et al. Rituximab treatment experience in patients with complicated type 1 autoimmune hepatitis in Europe and North America. J Hepatol. 2018;68:S217–8.
Dörner T, Posch M, Wagner F, Hüser A, Fischer T, Mooney L, et al. THU0313 double-blind, randomized study of VAY736 single dose treatment in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome (PSS). Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:300–1.
Dickson ER, Murtaugh PA, Wiesner RH, Grambsch PM, Fleming TR, Ludwig J, et al. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: refinement and validation of survival models. Gastroenterology. 1992;103:1893–901.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Aldo Montano-Loza, Andrew Mason and Maryam Ebadi each declare no potential conflicts of interest. Guido Stirnimann reports personal fees from Intercept Switzerland, during the conduct of the study.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Management of Cirrhotic Patient
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stirnimann, G., Ebadi, M., Mason, A.L. et al. Cirrhosis and Autoimmune Liver Disease. Curr Hepatology Rep 18, 49–58 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11901-019-00449-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11901-019-00449-1