Introduction

High-entropy alloys (HEAs), which contain multiple principal elements, represent a novel design strategy for high-performance alloys.1,2,3,4,5,6,7 FeCoNiCr-based HEAs are a representative group characterized by a single solid-solution phase with either face-centered cubic (FCC) or body-centered cubic (BCC) structure depending on the fifth principal element, e.g., FeCoNiCrMn (FCC)8,9,10,11 and FeCoNiCrAl (BCC).12,13 To identify the kind and stability of the solid-solution phase in FeCoNiCr-based HEAs, Zhang et al.14 proposed a series of solid-solution formulas including the entropy of mixing (ΔSmix), enthalpy of mixing (ΔHmix), and atomic-size difference (δ). Guo et al.15 also adopted the electronegativity difference (∆χ) and valence electron concentration (VEC) to predict the formation of different solid-solution phases in equiatomic or nonequiatomic HEAs.

HEAs with an FCC matrix comprising a single solid solution exhibit high ductility but low strength at room temperature, whereas BCC-matrix HEAs exhibit much higher strength but lower ductility.16,17,18,19,20 Considering this regularity, much effort has been expended in attempts to obtain a trade-off between the strength and ductility of dual-phase HEAs composed of either two solid solutions or one solid-solution matrix with various ordered intermetallics. He et al.21 designed a FeCoNiCr HEA alloyed with Ti and Al elements and found that the γ′ precipitates with Ni3(Ti,Al) structure considerably strengthened the FCC matrix. Yang et al.22 recently reported that a (Ti,Al)-doped FeCoNi equiatomic alloy showed much higher yield strength and tensile strength of 1 GPa and 1.5 GPa, respectively, while the ductility remained at 50% after fracture. They found a ductile (Ni43.3Co23.7Fe8)3(Ti14.4Al8.6Fe2) multicomponent nanoprecipitate homogeneously dispersed in the FCC matrix. Using another method, BCC-matrix HEAs can also be toughened by adjustment of the principal elements, leading to formation of complex phases. Fan et al.23 found that the compressive strength and ductility of a C-doped AlFeCoNi HEA were 2.4 GPa and 32.6%, respectively, since the as-cast microstructure was composed of B2 dendrites with a nanostructure of interdendrites in which nano L12 phases precipitated from the FCC solid solution.

In the work presented herein, a series of FeCoNiCr0.5Alx HEAs were prepared via the self-propagating high-temperature synthesis method. The compressive properties of the HEAs with different Al element contents depended notably on the as-cast microstructure, which showed a dual-phase nature with a combination of BCC dendrites and FCC interdendrites. This work focuses on a discussion of the solidification process and the formation of this dual-phase microstructure.

Experimental Procedures

FeCoNiCr0.5Alx HEAs were synthesized using the thermite reaction between Al element and metal oxides Co2O3, Cr2O3, Fe2O3, and NiO according to the designed compositions. Reactant powders of analytical grade with average particle size of 75 μm were supplied by SCRC (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd., P.R. China). The detailed preparation process can be found in Ref. 24.

For metallographic observation and phase identification, samples were sectioned from the as-cast rods and polished to fine finish (2.5-μm diamond suspension) then etched in mixed 1:3 HF:HNO3 solution for 15 s. The microstructure was characterized by optical microscopy (OM, Olympus BX-60M) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Sirion) coupled with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). Phase identification was carried out by x-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (D8 Discover) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm). The phase structure was analyzed by field-emission transmission electron microscopy (FE-TEM, JEM-2100F). The compressive properties of samples at room temperature were tested by using an electronic universal testing machine (CMT5105, SANS, China) at strain rate of 10−3 s−1.

Results and Discussion

Figure 1 depicts the XRD patterns obtained for the FeCoNiCr0.5Alx HEAs. As the atomic ratio of Al was increased from 0.6 to 1.2, the intensity of peaks indicating the FCC solid-solution phase decreased while those corresponding to the BCC solid-solution phase increased. In the FeCoNiCr0.5Al1.2 HEA, peaks for ordered BCC phases were detected. Obviously, all the HEAs showed dual-phase nature, but the BCC/FCC ratio increased with increasing Al addition, consistent with Ref. 25.

Fig. 1
figure 1

XRD patterns of FeCoNiCr0.5Alx HEAs; inset shows (100) peaks obtained at low scan rate

Figure 2 shows the compressive properties and as-cast microstructure of the FeCoNiCr0.5Alx HEAs. For the FeCoNiCr0.5Al0.6 HEA, the yield strength, fracture strength, and fracture strain were 412 MPa, 2112 MPa, and 42%, respectively. The as-cast microstructure of the FeCoNiCr0.5Al0.6 HEA clearly showed a dendrite of FCC solid solution with BCC-type precipitates located interdendritically, according to the XRD result above. As the Al content was increased, the matrix of the HEA changed from FCC to BCC solid solution, leading to a considerable promotion of the compressive strength. Specifically, the yield strength and fracture strength of the FeCoNiCr0.5Al0.8 and FeCoNiCr0.5Al1.0 HEAs were 1214 MPa, 1140 MPa, and 2923 MPa, and 2873 MPa, respectively. Meanwhile, the fracture strain in both HEAs remained at 37% and 31%, respectively. Comparing the two kinds of as-cast microstructure, the distinct difference is the volume fraction and morphology of the interdendritic phases. In the FeCoNiCr0.5Al0.8 HEA, the interdendritic phase shows plate-like morphology and its volume fraction is comparable to that of the dendritic phase. However, the FeCoNiCr0.5Al1.2 HEA showed brittle fracture behavior with fracture strain of 16% and decreased fracture strength of 1832 MPa.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Compressive stress–strain curves of FeCoNiCr0.5Alx HEAs; insets show the as-cast microstructure of each alloy

Considering the high compressive properties of both the FeCoNiCr0.5Al0.8 and FeCoNiCr0.5Al1.0 HEA, the detailed morphology of their as-cast microstructures is shown in Fig. 3. Three distinct solidification structures can be found in the FeCoNiCr0.5Al0.8 HEA (Fig. 3a), viz. dendrites, network-like eutectics, and plate-like eutectics. From the magnified figure of the dendrite, it is clear that rod-like nanoparticles with average size of 100 nm precipitated homogeneously in the matrix. Meanwhile, network-like eutectics appeared in the interdendritic area; the formation mechanism can be characterized by the regular eutectic. Furthermore, another kind of plate-like eutectic is observed, located in grain-boundary areas. The growth direction of the plate-like eutectics was along the grain boundary and towards the grain interior. The as-cast microstructure of the FeCoNiCr0.5Al1.0 HEA (Fig. 3b) was basically identical to that of the FeCoNiCr0.5Al0.8 HEA. However, the volume fraction of the plate-like and network-like eutectics was remarkably decreased. For both HEAs, the BCC dendrites obviously dominated the high compressive strength performance. It is reasonable to attribute the improved ductility of this kind of dual-phase HEA to the eutectics formed both interdendritically and at grain boundaries, which considerably reduce the embrittlement of the interfaces. Meanwhile, the reduced volume fraction of the eutectics in the FeCoNiCr0.5Al1.0 HEA led to a slight decrease of the compressive strain, which confirms the above deduction.

Fig. 3
figure 3

As-cast microstructure of (a) FeCoNiCr0.5Al0.8 and (b) FeCoNiCr0.5Al1.0 HEAs; insets show magnifications of dendrites and eutectics

TEM images of the dendrite (Fig. 4a) and plate-like eutectics (Fig. 4b) of the FeCoNiCr0.5Al0.8 HEA are shown in Fig. 4. In Fig. 4a, the selective-area electron diffraction (SEAD) patterns of nanoparticles and matrix, respectively, indicate that the dendrite matrix is an ordered BCC solid-solution phase while the nanoparticle is a disordered one. The EDS mapping results shown on the right in Fig. 4a reveal that the matrix of the dendrite was enriched in Al, Co, and Ni elements but contained less Fe and Cr. According to the detailed EDS results summarized in Table I, the ordered BCC matrix may have a (CoNi)Al-type structure. The nanoparticles, however, maintained a multicomponent distribution with high content of Al element. The EDS mapping results in Fig. 4b indicate a strong Al-enriched distribution at the interplate area that causes the plate phase in the eutectics to be Al poor and the component ratio close to that of FeCoNiCr-based FCC solid solution, as also confirmed by the SAED pattern of the plate phase. In the interplate phase, the Al content is much higher than that in the FCC plate and the SAED pattern indicates that it has a BCC solid-solution structure. Combining the EDS results in Table I, it can be presumed that the interplate BCC phase may have (CoNi)3Al-type structure and the formation mechanism of this kind of FCC/BCC eutectics follows faceted–nonfaceted growth.

Fig. 4
figure 4

TEM images, SAED patterns, and EDS maps of (a) dendrite phase and (b) plate-like eutectics in FeCoNiCr0.5Al0.8 HEA

Table I EDS results (at.%) for dendrite phase and plate-like eutectics

With the purpose of discussing the formation of the as-cast microstructure in the FeCoNiCr0.5Al0.8 HEA, the phase diagram of the FeCoNiCr0.5Alx HEA was calculated with the aid of Pandat software (CompuTherm, USA) using the PanHEA database (Fig. 5). A ternary-phase region and a quaternary-phase region are located below the binary-phase region of B2 + Liquid. As the FeCoNiCr0.5Al0.8 HEA solidifies, the first phase formed is B2-type BCC phase, which has a dendrite morphology as shown in Fig. 3. However, due to the strong interaction between Al and other transitional elements, a spinodal decomposition process takes place, forming BCC nanoprecipitates in the matrix.26 Then, a eutectic reaction occurs interdendritically to form the network-like eutectics as the temperature of the melt decreases into the ternary-phase region. As this reaction proceeds, residual liquid will continue to be pushed to grain boundaries, and the content changes along the line below the B2 + Liquid binary-phase region, heading towards the quaternary-phase region. Finally, another eutectic reaction occurs at the grain boundary to form the plate-like eutectics. The complex as-cast microstructure in the dual-phase FeCoNiCr0.5Al0.8 HEA can be explained based on the results and discussion above. Meanwhile, it can be concluded that the formation of eutectics with distinct morphology can be attributed to the Al content in the residual liquid.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Phase diagram of FeCoNiCr0.5Alx HEAs calculated using Pandat software

Conclusion

FeCoNiCr0.5Alx HEAs were prepared via the self-propagating high-temperature casting method and their as-cast microstructures and formation mechanism systematically investigated. Based on the results and discussion, the following conclusions can be drawn:

  1. 1.

    The FeCoNiCr0.5Alx HEAs showed dual-phase nature with complex as-cast microstructure depending on the Al content.

  2. 2.

    The as-cast microstructure of the FeCoNiCr0.5Al0.8 and FeCoNiCr0.5Al1.0 HEAs was composed of ordered/nonordered BCC nanocomposite dendrites, network-like interdendritic FCC/BCC eutectics, and plate-like FCC/BCC eutectics.

  3. 3.

    The compressive yield strength, fracture strength, and strain of the FeCoNiCr0.5Al0.8 HEA were 1214 MPa, 2923 MPa, and 37%, being much higher than the values for the other HEAs. These high compressive properties can be attributed to the eutectics formed both interdendritically and at grain boundaries, which considerably reduce the embrittlement of the interfaces.