Abstract
Distributed generation (DG) is a comprehensive, compact, and salient segment of the centralized power system due to its extensive prospective benefits in constrained/unconstrained power quality parameters. Traditional power plants have their own technical, environmental, and economic diminutions for the expansion of power generation in the distribution network. Furthermore, unreserved fossil fuel escorted the electricity companies towards the renewable resources of energy generation. The enhancement of power quality parameters, cost-saving, and fulfilling the energy demand can be achieved by the integration of optimized DG in the distribution network. This paper presents the conventional to modern mathematical approaches enacted for the objective variables’ empowerment via optimization of size and location of DG. The optimization intricacies, parameters, constraints, and benefits are also highlighted in this paper. The exhaustive data-based assessment carried out in this paper is a new work in the literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In the modern era, distributed generation (DG) is an indispensable part of the electric power system. It is a futuristic approach for the modern power system due to its enormous advantages (technological benefits, financial benefits, and environmental benefits). The presence of DG in the distribution network enhances the stability and utilization of renewable energy compared to the previous conventional centralized generation (CG). DG bridges the gap between the generation of electric power and day-by-day increasing load demands. These advantages can be achieved by DG selection, site selection, analysis of load demand, renewable energy sources (RES) selection, and optimization for the placement of DG. The integration of DG in the distribution network also facilitates the reduced active power losses and reactive VA losses, enhanced voltage profile, and improved reliability and stability [1]. To create a renewably energized world such a revolutionary approach must be deliberately promoted at political level, social level, and individual levels. The separation from a conventional hierarchy of CG is escorted by the perception, recognition, and dissemination of RES in the distribution network. Moreover, DG unification with the centralized grid generation requires an advanced protection system that can devise the secured implementation to attain promising results despite the presence of various power quality constraints [2, 3].
The relative comparison between CG and DG could be done by the following factors [4]:
-
(a)
Output Capacity
The generation capacity of CG is 100 MW-1000 GW while in DG it is up to 300 MW.
-
(b)
Technology Used
In CG Hydroelectric plant, thermoelectric plant and nuclear power plant have been used while in DG the electric power has been generated by Diesel engine, Gas engine and RES.
-
(c)
Location
CG is situated distant from the consumer and normally established in sector of non-renewable or renewable resources while DG is located near to the consumer facilities.
-
(d)
Generation to Distribution
Step-up transformers have been used for high voltage transmission to substation in CG further step-down transformers are used for distribution from substation to distribution having reduced line power losses. DG may or may not be connected to grid for low voltage distribution system.
1.1 Contribution of Paper
In this paper, various types of conventional to modern mathematical optimization approaches to DG allocation are considered for enhancing the power quality parameters, environmental parameters, and financial parameters of the power network in the presence of different constraints.
1.2 Paper Organization
In Section 2, employed aspirations of DG planning have been elaborated. Section 3 presents the optimization approaches (conventional as well as modern mathematical) with methodology, constraints, and optimized results. In Section 4, conclusion of the paper is presented.
2 Employed Aspirations for DG Planning
Multitudinous driving factors have been attained by the optimization of DG allocation and size selection in power system network. The aspirations of DG planning can be recapitulated as technological, economic, and environmental perspectives. The optimization DG allocation benefits are extensively illustrated in Fig. 1.
2.1 Technological Aspect
DG aims to very significant technical advantages which embrace the voltage profile enhancement, active and reactive power losses minimization, power factor optimization (PFO), line loss reduction and network MVA capacity maximization. The various researches for technological advantages are summarized as:
2.1.1 Voltage Profile Enhancement
Voltage profile enhancement (VPE) is an imperative parameter in the power quality of the distribution system. The voltage level is boosted by increasing the penetration level of DG during optimized allocation in the distribution network. In the presence of DG, the VPE is selected as an objective function and the results are significant by providing the bidirectional power flow to/from the power grid during peak hours or valley hours of load [5]. The voltage stability is increased by using the incremental voltage (dv/dp) sensitivities method during the integration of DG [6]. Voltage profile along with voltage stability is also improved by utilizing the positive sequence of voltage ratio [7], power voltage curve [8], and voltage sensitivity index [9]. The voltage sag problem is reduced in a low voltage distribution network during various faults [10]. VPE along with power loss reduction (PLR) is facilitated by considering voltage amplitude as a function of injected power [11], while the max operator is used for such optimization in the Tehran electricity distribution grid [12, 13] and in radial distribution network [14]. The authors proposed a voltage stability index to enhance the voltage level by DG allocation [15]. P–V buses [16] and multiple micro turbines [17] have been incorporated for the improvement of voltage profile and such type of distribution network consist a renewable energy based optimized DG allocation. Voltage rise issue is also encountered with the integration of DG to meet the power requirement during time variant and invariant load [18].
2.1.2 Power Loss Reduction
The integration and optimized allocation of DG in the distribution network enables the minimization of various power losses. Reducing the network losses, reactive power losses, and line loading is done by the optimum sizing and siting of DG in a meshed network [19] and to the load of concentrated buses in ref. [20]. Total energy losses are reduced by active and reactive VA injection at selected bus [9, 10] while real-time solar radiation and atmospheric temperature are considered to reduce the real power losses in a voltage distribution system of Thailand with the contemplation of power quality constraints [15]. A solar photo voltaic (SPV) system is used to reduce power losses with voltage limit consideration [21] while for power injection, DG size of 10–80% of system load demand is selected to diminish the actual power losses [22]. Moreover, actual power losses are decreased by the integration of multiple distributed generation (MDG) systems in continuous and discrete optimization [23]. Transmission line losses are reduced by ECIM which is a function of power quality parameters [24]. However, real power injection and reactive power compensation are done by wind power generation [6]. Total power losses are reduced by computing approximate losses for each bus [25] and compensating real component of branch currents [26]. Real power losses are minimized by using a metaheuristic optimization approach (MHOA) [27]. It is also minimized for hourly power flow with different penetration levels in different operating modes of wind turbines [28]. Annual energy losses are reduced with time-varying characteristics of load curve [29], random behavior of wind speed [30] and intermittent nature of RES [31], avoiding RPF [32], and allowing RPF [33].
2.1.3 Power Factor Optimization
Power factor is also an important power quality parameter which is necessary to optimized in the presence of DG. To reduce the real power losses, authors optimized the value of power factor by considering the maximum and minimum value of operating power factor while taking inequality boundary conditions, related practical concerns and rounded off issues into account [27]. DG size and power factor is simultaneously optimized by assuming the pre-specified constant value of power factor at various load level [29]. Energy losses are reduced by optimizing the power factor in a battery energy storage (BES) integrated SPV system at various load level and the comparison is demonstrated at unity power (UPF), lagging power and leading power factor [34]. Impact of power factor variation is shown on power losses and voltage profile by taking UPF or non UPF of the system [35]. Optimal value of power factor is identified by considering the all-possible values of power factor using curve fitted technique and exact solution method [22]. In [9], a comparative analysis has been shown for UPF and 0.9 lagging power factor with different DG optimization approaches.
2.1.4 Total Harmonic Distortion Reduction
Total harmonic distortion reduction (THDR) is another determined objective of DG planning. The forward/backward sweep approach has been used to optimize the total harmonic distortion (THD) in a distributed system that comprises the amalgamation of passive elements and a harmonic current generator. Moreover, a harmonic spectrum is developed for a nonlinear (NL) load of deviated frequency driver and a convertible speed driver having branch current is a function of harmonic current [31]. THD is optimized in an SPV-based DG system where the various solar radiation levels are considered. THD in voltage profile and current profile have been measured by considering the background harmonics in an 11-kW grid-connected inverter [15].
2.2 Economical Aspect
Cost optimization (COP) is the pillar of the foundation for planning, execution, and maintenance of DG in a distribution system. Total cost (comprises installation cost, maintenance cost, and sag reduction cost) have been reduced by optimum DG allocation and the results are significant [10]. The distribution companies (DisCo)’s cost minimization and profit maximization are exhibited using BLA for DG planning in ref. [36]. DG capital cost with the state-dependent cost is considered in ref. [37] while fuel cost reduction (considering utilization factor) is achieved by the integration of DG in Japan’s east power station [38]. The reimbursement time and anticipated profit rate are calculated by forming a multi-objective (MO) DG optimization for the sake of DisCo and owner benefits [39].
2.3 Environmental Aspect
Environment protection has been one of the most crucial aspects of human beings' existence on earth because of the aggressive use of fossil fuels in the traditional power system for meeting the peak demand of end-users. DG could be a prospective measure for the perforation of a natural source of energy into the electrical network of the power system for reducing greenhouse gaseous pollutants emissions and weather change [40]. DG has a great potential for the utilization of RES in power generation and is capable to build a low carbon emission grid. Carbon emission has been calculated for the complete life cycle of DG with the help of the carbon emission intensity factor having a procedure in which the life cycle of the product and pollutant part of the product have been pre-measured. With the penetration of RES in the power system, CO2 emission is reduced up to 1.8 million tons [41].
3 Optimization Approaches
Optimization approaches can be categorized into the following classification; conventional, modern mathematical, and hybrid.
3.1 Conventional Approaches
Conventional approaches of optimization are traditional basic search methods for the optimization of DG parameters. The proposed techniques have been executed by various researchers under this category. The classification of convention algorithm is given in Fig. 2. Moreover, a significant review and data-based assessment of such approaches for DG optimization are conferred in Table 1.
3.1.1 Analytical Method (AM)
In this paper, several AM is reviewed that are used for optimum DG allocation in a distribution network. Total power losses are reduced by an equivalent current injection method in which the BIBC matrix and BCBV have been applied for finding the value of injected current and tested for three distribution systems without considering the admittance matrix and Jacobin matrix [24, 42]. The exact loss formula (ELF) is used for the DG optimization and this method is independent of the type of DG and able to generate the active power and reactive VA [25]. To minimize the energy losses in a three-phase unbalanced system feasible optimization interval (FOI) approach is used and bridging the gap between feeder demand characteristic and SPV based DG (SPVDG) characteristic [32]. DG optimization is done by power injection method (PIM) in a dispatchable system or non-dispatchable system with the consideration of the time-varying nature of the load and supply [29]. FOI technique has been implemented in which the RPF is considered and the power is injected at coupling node followed by the calculation of line losses by Carson equations [35]. An algebraic approach (AA) has been applied for VPE while in [7] an iterative method (IM) has been used for improving the power quality parameters and line loadabilty. In continuation of DG optimization, analytical techniques like a primal–dual interior-point algorithm (MPDIPA) [11], AA [43], multi-objective index (IMO) with self-correction algorithm (SCA) [34], and heuristic curve fitted method (HCFM) [22] are analyzed. In continuation, an IA is used to get the optimum size and location of DG that enhance the reliability and voltage profile of a distribution network. The approach is evaluated on IEEE 34 bus system and the results are significant on the of different indices [44].
3.1.2 Exhaustive Search (ES)
In [45], the brute force method (BFM) is implemented for the SPVDG system incorporation of MATLAB programming with the consideration of daily load and supply curve without violating the European standard on power quality (EN 50,160 standards). It is like the backward/ forward sweep algorithm includes the large the R/X ratio of long feeder by assuming the π model of a distributed system. A two-stage technique is formed for the DG optimization which is dependent on the supply and load variation, the internal stage consists of ES while the external stage has clustering approach (CA) [46]. Power quality parameters are improved by using the probabilistic approach (PA) [15] and weightage ES [47] by optimal DG allocation. In continuation, Monte Carlo simulation and C language are also used. A Newton–Raphson (N-R) method along with IM has been enacted for the MO optimization problem to improvise the cost-effective power quality parameters [34].
3.1.3 Linear Programming (LP)
The utilization of the distribution network is changed after the dissimilation of DG. The authors presented a methodology for the optimization of DG and getting the maximum harvesting of energy by considering the various power quality and financial constraints. The energy reaping is dependent on DG size, load level, DG location, occurred losses, and financial parameters. Moreover, the limitations which are occurred due to financial concerns are considered to implementing an IM for solving the linear optimization problem [48]. This methodology has the significance to validate the results of nature-inspired optimization techniques. The authors evaluated a genetic algorithm technique for the DG allocation in the actual distribution network of Egypt and the outcomes are justified with the help of LP. Moreover, MO optimization is carried out for optimizing the various parameters of power quality like LLR, SRI, VPE, and PFR [49].
3.1.4 Non-Linear Programming (NLP)
Adaptive reactive power compensation must also be a benefit that would be facilitated in the DG incorporation in the distribution network. Continuing this, the authors demonstrated a DG optimization technique that is based on NLP to solve the MO function. Different objective functions are converted into a single objective function because of power loss reduction and enhanced voltage regulation. It has been highlighted that the application of this optimization technique is valid for different types of DGs by employing the fuzzification technique and adequate weighting scale to facilitate the one-level approach for various objective functions. However, the process of optimization is intended with the help of constraint optimization (CONOPT) which is a tool of general algebraic modeling system (GAMS) software used for nonstop power flow runs [50].
3.1.5 Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP)
In [36], a two-tier approach having the mutual approach among DisCo with the owner has been accomplished. This bi-level MILP approach constitutes the upper level having DG location and central point of power injection while the lower level consists of payment minimization of DisCo to the energy market. A decision-making approach between the owner for profit maximization and DisCo for payment minimization is considered.
3.1.6 Mixed-Integer Non-Linear Programming (MINLP)
The MINLP optimization technique is adopted in various researches [8, 51]. It will affect the DisCo investment planning for transformer purchasing and feeder up-gradation. A pool market model is developed having Lagrangian multiplier (LM) and line loss sensitivity with the consideration of equality and inequality constraints which is optimized by GAMS using a Sparse nonlinear optimizer solver for generation companies and DisCo profit [51]. Beta and Weibull probability distribution functions have been employed to calculate the probabilistic characteristics of natural sources for DG optimization [8].
3.1.7 Dynamic Programming (DP)
Increasing the penetration of renewable energy-based DG in distributed generation is one of the futuristic aspects of energy generation. A reconfiguration of the chronological network has been proposed to reduce the limitation of natural sources. To enhance the power quality parameters, a Markov decision process is adopted to optimize the DG operation. Moreover, the present and future costs are considered to decide every step of the Markov model. Consequently, dynamic programming is used to optimize the proposed recursive model and evaluated on IEEE 33 and IEEE 123 test systems [52].
3.1.8 Optimum Power Flow (OPF)
Several researchers [53, 54, 55, 56, 57] presented the OPF technique for the allocation of DG. CONOPT with a generalized gradient method is used for finding the network generation capacities. For maximizing the generation capacities, the NL optimization executed by finding the multiple local optima is used in a highly meshed reliable system. Initially no contingencies in the problem formulation and solved using scrutiny constrained OPF models then selection of contingency without constraint and include the most violated constraints. In [53, 54], Fault level constraint optimum power flow (FLCOPF) is considered for sinks source concept having bi-level procedures OPF and generation reduction optimization algorithm to solve the quadratic benefit function by considering capacity expansion locations (CELs). For social welfare and profit maximization, local marginal price and short-run marginal price with LM are considered [55]. In continuation of the above social welfare, maximization involves the quadratic curves of benefit, bid, and cost given by DISCOs, seller, and DG owner respectively while profit maximization includes the two-block (inner and outer) approach. OPF technique with genetic algorithm for a variable number of DG [56] and as ordinal optimization (OO) for three-level approach [57] has been executed. Moreover, out of search space, one of all possible solutions is in the top percent α with a probability level of P.
3.1.9 Load Concentration (LC)
In [20], the Kalman filter algorithm is executed for the optimization of DG allocation. This algorithm has the properties of smoothing and noise rejection which are used to solve the linear time-varying equations. Initially, the losses are calculated by the N-R method then the state vector estimation is completed in the measurement update and time update stages which are evaluated by the root mean square error. In [58], the concept of the equivalent load is implemented in two-step approaches of load centroid (LCn) and performance index. Firstly, the equivalent load is calculated then the PI is approachable for finding the active power loss and average node voltage variation.
3.1.10 Continuous Power Flow (CPF)
Referring to the continuation parameters and two levels iterative approach (IA) most sensitive buses have been found for optimum location of DG approaching towards bifurcation point from a stable point. CPF optimized system having predictor and corrector step could be incorporated as a compensator or as a large source for DG units [59].
3.2 Modern Mathematical Approaches
Modern mathematical approaches are basically artificial intelligent techniques founded on the performance of society and nature. Such type of approaches can be predominantly designated as given in Fig. 3. An assessment of modern mathematical approaches for DG optimization is manifested in Table 2.
3.2.1 Evolutionary Programming (EP)
EP is one of the matured artificial intelligence optimization algorithms based on the artificers of real anthology having metamorphosis, contention, and evolution levels which have been used for non-continual, uneven, and undistinguishable optimization problems unlike the conventional methods of optimization. Reactive power planning has been executed using the probability transition rule in [60] comprises the following steps: initialization, statistics, mutation, completion, and determination. The authors demonstrated the EP on 12.66 kV, IEEE 69 test system with two modes of operation involving turning off DG based on wind turbine (WTDG) and clipping of the output using an index-based scheme and sensitivity analysis by keeping the ratio of dispatched wind energy to load (WPDLR) within designated limit [28].
3.2.2 Genetic Algorithm (GA)
GA has the natural assortment that relates to the greater category of EP and has been used to evaluate for the optimum DG allocation in the power system [61]. In continuation, GA has been demonstrated to produce higher grade optimization by leaning on bio-simulated steps like mutation, crossover, and selection. It has been implemented for NL optimization in a Tehran regional electricity company considering the financial objectives that include the pricing of power connectors and the energy which is not provided by the system [14]. Moreover, the linear problem has been optimized for the enhancement of the power quality parameter in the West Delta sub-transmission network [49]. Minimization of voltage sag effect that is calculated by voltage divider rule with the line loss minimization and cost-saving subjected to the limitations of power flow, voltage level. The optimum size of DG is achieved by a stochastic optimization technique with a point of common coupling consideration during various fault conditions [10]. The various types of load models have been considered for the optimization results with the consideration of source as negative sink and index-based performance evaluation [62]. GA has been integrated with OPF [56] and AM [16] for DG optimization. In [63], step by step approach has been used for the optimization of the size and location of DG in main and sub-network distribution systems using single-step restoration and supplied by utility-owned DG to encounter the power outage problem due to cold load pick up conditions. A non-dominated sorting GA (NSGA) and forward/ backward sweep method have been executed for the renewable DG / nonrenewable DG (NRDG) allocation and size selection in [31]. Zonal division of peak load [64], moment method and central limit theorem [65] have been incorporated with DG planning for the cost, power quality parameters, and reliability optimization. Moreover, SPV and WTDG have been characterized as DG for Weibull reliability, and maintenance costs optimization results in annual operating cost (AOC) minimization.
3.2.3 Tabu Search (TS)
TS was proposed in 1986 that is based on the planning of forbidden moves violating the cycling to form of strong inhibition search in which enough memory is saved for the tabu from down to up in the tabu list. TS technique is employed for the optimization of DG placement considering the residential, commercial, and industrial load having three types of algorithms proceed simultaneously which involves rounding calculation, local minimum finding, and optimum installation respectively [66]. The procedure involves initialization, neighborhood solution, loss calculations, repetition, and updating of the current solution till a maximum number of iterations to get the optimization. If the neighborhood solution is healthier than the present set of values then the neighborhood result is adopted that will satisfy the aspiration in the tabu list. The authors presented a methodology, for the optimization of DG resources and reactive power resources optimization with the involvement of short, intermediate (record best rail solution) and long-term memory (more than 3 successive iterations) having controlled output (CO) and Z scenarios [67]. In this work, the forbidden move i.e., the addition of a new move and deletion of the old one is involved having the updated solution in the next iteration of the tabu list whose length is directly proportional to the better solution.
3.2.4 Harmony Search (HS)
Geem et al. suggested this heuristic technique, is built on imitating the extemporization of the music player for finding the best condition of music by an artistic estimation. Musicologist Tirro and French composer Jean Philippe Rameau documented the history of American Jazz and invented the classical method of harmony examined on Traveling salesman problem (TSP) [68]. Improved multi-objective harmony search (IMOHS) has been suggested for the optimization of DG placement having qualitative comparison with NSGA II. IMOHS includes the search process of novel global HS which includes the mutation probability and excludes the harmony memory considering rate parameters. Mainly two steps namely domination rank and crowding distance are involved in this technique. Out of two harmonies, better harmony is dominated by another harmony, non-dominated harmony is stored in harmony memory while the dominated harmony is not abandoned and got a second chance for extemporization [69].
3.2.5 Simulated Annealing (SA)
In 1983, Kirkpatrick et al. have been researched the SA optimization technique having four steps namely concise configuration, random selection, determining function, and schedule of the annealing process. The authors demonstrated five DG applications to extract the various benefits of DG allocation in the distribution network by using simulated annealing optimization technique. The load flow analysis is used to calculate the voltage drops and power losses having MO function. This technique is evaluated on IEEE 33 test system and concluded the increased penetration of renewable energy in a radial power system. The results exhibited the optimal size and location of DG by considering the number of DG [70].
3.2.6 Imperialist Competitive Method (ICM)
In [71, 72, 73, 74], an optimization technique has been implemented which is based on the nature of imperialistic nature of imperialist for the addiction of imperialism to make an empire. In the whole approach, the colonies approach toward their imperialist then the cost of each empire is calculated to interchange the positions of weaker one to the strongest one till only one empire is exist like the optimized value in DG. In continuation, the profit of distribution network operators is maximized and implemented in the UK under Ofgen which includes power flow constraints, operating limit, voltage profile, feeder capacity, and the number of DG steps with crossover probability and mutation probability function programmed in MATLAB [73]. In [74], losses are calculated by load flow technique in which KVL and KCL are used to measure the upstream voltage resulting in complex power measurement then ICM is implemented for DG optimization in zonal distribution network using islanding operation of the sensitive load.
3.2.7 Ant Colony Optimization (ACO)
ACO technique has been characterized as; initialization, cost function calculation, constraint assignment, feasible state selection, and neighborhood structure with the properties like search, memory storage, feasible neighborhood, termination condition, probabilistic decision, ant routing table, and pheromone update. ACO technique is implemented for restructuring the distribution network framework to minimize power losses. ACO exhibited the characteristic to evade premature stability and trapping in local optima. This technique is tested and implemented on IEEE 33 bus system and the results are significant and power losses are reduced in comparison to without restructuring the distribution network. The convergence time also indicates the faster solution by this technique. Moreover, network losses are reduced from 140 to 110 kW by reconfiguration of DG in the distribution system [75].
3.2.8 Artificial Bee Colony (ABC)
Karboga presented an optimization technique that is based on the communal etiquette of honey bees and encompasses three key components namely food source, searchers, and non-searchers which are having self-organizational behavior depending on alternate feedback, random search, and sharing of information. A bi-level approach having ABC optimization technique is demonstrated on IEEE 33 system for DG allocation. In the first step, DG location is found and this process is followed by the DG size optimization considering 4 different cases to get the possible outcomes in less computation time [76]. Moreover, indexes are introduced in ABC optimization to improve the power quality parameters. In continuation, the authors attracted attention to the reformation of the industrial and commercial processes. The distribution loss index is included with the objective function because of its high presence in Iran [77].
3.2.9 Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)
In 1995, Kennedy et al. have been investigated PSO technique which is another social behavior simulation to optimization technique comprises the binds between artificial life to bird gathering, fish training and swarming behavior which require only ancient mathematical operators with less memory space and speed. The predecessor involves velocity matching, craziness, cornfield vector, auxiliary variable removal, multidimensional search, distance acceleration and present better version. The foundation of PSO having the pillars of social concept, swarm intelligence principles (proximate, quality, diverse response, stability, and adaptability) and computational behavior. In continuation author also discussed the various modified approach of PSO like multi-objective PSO (MPSO), constraint handling PSO, stretching PSO, cooperative PSO, comprehensive learning PSO and hybrid PSO. Tribal PSO (TPSO) with OO [37], constriction factor PSO [35] and MPSO [39, 78] are executed for renewable source-based DG optimization. Moreover, MPSO has been implemented for optimizing the power quality parameter with a constraint of expected rate of return (ERR) results in terms of total loss power index (TLPI). Synchronous compensator, synchronous generator and synchronous based DG units are used in the optimization process [79]. The continuous and discrete optimization by using N-R method is incorporated for DG optimization and penalty factor calculation [23].
3.2.10 Cuckoo Search (CS)
The researchers Yang et al. have been projected an optimization technique build on the communal bearing of a cuckoo bird in addition to Levy flight conduct for better results due to a good combination of randomization and escalation having fewer constraints CS involves three steps namely cuckoo breeding behavior, Levy flight and search in which a cuckoo bird randomly search the nest, place its egg and if the entertainer bird did not find that egg fit for the nest then the entertainer bird will repudiate the cuckoo’s egg. The renewable energy-based DG optimization has been done by the CS algorithm to get technical, financial, and societal advantages. These tests are performed on IEEE 22 and IEEE 69 bus systems having the mono, dual and multi-DG injection. The proposed technology results are efficaciously compared with the established PSO technique [80]. Authors recommended the CS for optimization of the objective function which includes the upgraded voltage profile and abridged power loss with different weightage factors namely; (WL), (WV1), and (WV2) [81]. Moreover, the importance of indices base-voltage evaluation is also highlight in the power quality. The outcomes are significant and compared with well-established GA and PSO. Consequently, the CS technique has the following benefits:
It has the property to cover more distance in step randomization.
-
The requirement of optimization parameters is lesser as compared to other approaches so more adaptability is present among the researchers.
-
It is inspired by the meta-population approach in which every nest provides a group of solutions.
-
The tuned parameters are not dependent on the meeting frequency, so accuracy consideration is not a necessary step.
-
It may lead to getting the high acceptance due to its simplicity and robust nature.
3.2.11 Firefly Methods (FFM)
FFM is based on the gleaming etiquettes of a firefly in which three simple assumptions have been followed; all firefly is androgynous and each one produces a flare to attract others, the attraction force is proportional to the brightness and each firefly will attract toward the glower one and in the absence of brighter one then the firefly will take the random step in search space. A modified FFM is used for DG allocation for the active and reactive power compensation along with shunt capacitors. FFM optimization technique considered the four different compensation cases of the distribution network (absence of compensator, presence of shunt capacitor, presence of DG, and presence of integrated DG and shunt capacitor) and evaluated on IEEE 85 test system. The outcomes are significant as compared to PSO and MINLP [82]. Moreover, voltage profile and line losses are considered for the optimization of DG size and allocation. The evaluation has been done on IEEE 69, radial distribution system, and concluded with the results having the same efficacy as in GA [83].
3.3 Hybrid Approaches
In the optimal DG planning, heterogeneous hybrid AI techniques have been proposed by various researchers that are based on the amalgamation of two optimization approaches which work in progression mode or equidistant mode to solve more complex problems. In hybrid category GA is integrated with TS (GATS) [84], PSO (GAPSO) [85], OPF (GAOPF) [86] and fuzzy approach (FZ) [87]. A collateral approach GA and TS is evaluated for the optimization of objective function in the form of GA chromosomes and TS neighbors [84]. For the optimized power quality parameters GAPSO is adopted in which GA is used for the DG allocation and PSO for size optimization with 30 and 20 population size respectively [85]. In GAOPF the decision variables are found using GA and OPF is implemented for the optimum solution. In [88], jumping frog PSO (JFPSO) forwarded the DG location for the optimization of DG by OPF. The deterioration in voltage level has been considered in PSO process followed by the GSA in PSOGSA hybrid optimization technique [89] while the enhanced transient stability is achieved with the cascade process of PSO and shuffled frog leaping (SFL) using CCT index on Dlg SILENT software [17]. Consolidations of FZ with TS (FZTS) has been wielded for the MO, DG optimization [26]. Hybrid optimization techniques are reviewed and summarized in Table 3 based on adopted techniques, test systems, optimized results, and comparison with other optimization techniques.
4 Conclusions
It has been concluded that DG is advantageous for the improvisation of the power system characteristics. It provides numerous optimization techniques implemented in DG allocation with the purpose to meet the limitations. It also acts as a tool to augment the stability, reliability, and consistency of the distribution network. Moreover, it is also to analyze the classification of the intricacies for functioning optimization algorithms. The pictorial taxonomy of data-based assessment of DG optimization approaches are given in Fig. 4.
In this paper, various optimization techniques have been successfully reviewed along with comparative analysis of conventional, modern mathematical and hybrid methods utilized for significant parameters optimization of DG that aims at technological, financial, and environmental benefits with the optimized result parameters. Moreover, conventional approaches are simple, easy to execute and highly précised but agonized due to single objective slow convergence optimization while modern mathematical approaches can solve the multi-objective complex problems, with a smaller number of iterations having some limitations like harder to code, various settling parameters and impetuous convergence. Hybrid optimizations approaches can handle more complex problems with faster convergence but it may undergo complexity including a smaller number of literatures.
Reviewed studies indicate that the integration of renewable energy will maximize the benefits of DG planning in the distribution network but it is also implying the necessity of a reliable assessment tool for renewable energy. The intermittent nature of renewable energy is required to encounter and effective energy storage may lead to the elimination of intermittency.
Additionally, the demand response is also not significantly considered by the researchers. Due to the high cost of the energy storage system, demand response is also a major contributor to the smart distribution system. There is a possibility to develop a system that included the planning and optimal dispatch of renewable DG with energy storage and demand response.
Abbreviations
- ALO:
-
Ant-Lion Optimization
- ALRPF:
-
Allow reverse power flow
- AO:
-
Anyone
- AVRPF:
-
Avoid reverse power flow
- BCBV:
-
Branch current to bus voltage
- BCS:
-
Bilateral Contract Scenario
- BDG:
-
Bio gass Distributed Generation
- BGA:
-
Binary Genetic Algorithm
- BIBC:
-
Bus injection to branch current
- BLA:
-
Bi-level Approach
- CAC:
-
Considering all constraints
- CCT:
-
Critical clearing time
- CGA:
-
Continuous Genetic Algorithm
- CGSA:
-
Classical Grid Search Algorithm
- CL:
-
Constant Load
- CML:
-
Commercial Load
- COP:
-
Cost Optimization
- CPLSM:
-
Combined power loss sensitivity method
- CPSO:
-
Clonal Particle Swarm Optimization
- DABC:
-
Discrete Artificial Bee Colony
- DHPF:
-
Decoupled harmonic power flow
- DS:
-
Dispatchable system
- ECIM:
-
Equivalent Current Injection Method
- EL:
-
Exhaustive Load Flow
- ELR:
-
Energy loss reduction
- FLC:
-
Fuzzy logic controller
- GLBIW:
-
Global Local Best Inertia Weight
- GOA:
-
Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm
- GSA:
-
Gravitation Search Algorithm
- HDG:
-
Hydro DG
- HeS:
-
Heuristic search
- HL:
-
High load
- HPSO:
-
Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization
- IB:
-
Immune based
- IGA:
-
Improved Genetic Algorithm
- IHRA:
-
Improved Hereford Ranch Algorithm
- IL:
-
Industrial load
- Itr.:
-
Iteration
- IVM:
-
Index Vector Method
- LaPF:
-
Lagging power factor
- LC:
-
Load Concentration
- LCCA:
-
Life cycle cost analysis
- LDC:
-
Local distribution company
- LePF:
-
Leading power factor
- LFC:
-
Limited feeder capacity
- LFG:
-
Land fill gas
- LI:
-
Loss Incentive
- LL:
-
Low load
- LLC:
-
Line loading capacity
- LLR:
-
Line loss reduction
- LSM:
-
Loss Sensitivity Method
- MALO:
-
Multi-objective Ant Lion Optimization
- MCPSO:
-
Modified Clonal Particle Swarm Optimization
- MFO:
-
Moth-Flame Optimization
- MGT:
-
Mini Gas turbine
- ML:
-
Medium Load
- MMNRES:
-
Multi membered non recombinative evolution strategy
- MNM:
-
Modified novel method
- MPI:
-
Multi objective performance index
- MVO:
-
Multi Verse Optimization
- MXL:
-
Mixed load
- ND:
-
Non differential
- NPr:
-
No preference
- NPV:
-
Net profit value
- OIW:
-
Constant Inertia Weight
- PFR:
-
Power flow reduction
- PI:
-
Power system performance index
- PP:
-
Probabilistic planning
- PR:
-
Pollutant reduction
- PSBIT:
-
Power Stabililty Based Index Technique
- PSF:
-
Price scaling factor
- QR:
-
Quick restoration
- RI:
-
Reliability improvement
- RIW:
-
Random Inertia Weight
- RL:
-
Residential load
- RP:
-
Repeated power flow
- RPF:
-
Reverse power flow
- ƩDG:
-
Number of Distributed Generator
- SI:
-
Stability improvement
- SL 0 :
-
Peak load
- SQP:
-
Sequential Quadratic Programming
- TI:
-
Total incentive
- Tiv:
-
Time invariant
- TLBO:
-
Teaching learning-based Optimization
- TP:
-
Traditional planning
- TSI:
-
Transient stability improvement
- Tv:
-
Time variant
- TVIW:
-
Time Varying Inertia Weight
- UCO:
-
Uncontrolled output
- UFC:
-
Unlimited feeder capacity
- Vdm:
-
Maximum voltage drops
- VL:
-
Voltage limit
- Vpm:
-
V % mean
- VSIM:
-
Voltage Sensitivity Index Method
- Wc:
-
Clipping wind turbine generation output
- WL :
-
Weightage factor for power loss
- WoDG:
-
Without Distributed Generation
- WSP:
-
Without solar penetration
- Wt:
-
Turning off wind turbine generation output
- WTBDG:
-
Wind turbine DG + Bio mass DG
- WV1 :
-
Weightage factor for voltage deviation
- WV2 :
-
Weightage factor for voltage variation
References
El-Khattam W, Salama MMA (2004) Distributed generation technologies, definitions and benefits. Electr Power Syst Res 71:119–128
Saxena V, Kumar N, Nangia U, Singh J (2021) Analysis of Smart Electricity Grid Framework Unified with Renewably Distributed Generation. In: Agrawal R, Singh CK, Goyal A (eds) Advances in Smart Communication and Imaging Systems Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Springer, Singapore
Saxena V, Kumar N, Nagia U (2021) Smart Grid: A Sustainable Smart Approach. Journal of Physics Conf Ser. 2007(1): 012042
Gonen T. (2014) Electrical power transmission system engineering: analysis and design. BocaRaton, Florida: T & F Group, LLC.
Muttaqi KM, Le AD, Negnevitsky M, Ledwich G (2014) An algebraic approach for determination of dg parameters to support voltage profiles in radial distribution networks. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 5:1351–1360
Arya LD, Koshti A, Choube SC (2012) Distributed generation planning using differential evolution accounting voltage stability consideration. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 42:196–207
Juanuwattanakul P (2012) Masoum M (2012) increasing distributed generation penetration in multiphase distribution networks considering grid losses, maximum loading factor and bus voltage limits. Gener Transm Distrib IET 6:1262–1271
Al Abri R, El-Saadany EF, Atwa YM (2013) Optimal placement and sizing method to improve the voltage stability margin in a distribution system using distributed generation. Power Syst IEEE Trans 28:326–334
Murthy VVSN, Kumar A (2013) Comparison of optimal dg allocation methods in radial distribution systems based on sensitivity approaches. Int J Electr Power Energy Sys 53:450–467
Biswas S, Goswami SK, Chatterjee A (2012) Optimum distributed generation placement with voltage sag effect minimization. Energy Convers Manag 53:163–174
Liu Z, Wen F, Ledwich G, Ji X (2011) Optimal sitting and sizing of distributed generators based on a modified primal-dual interior point algorithm. In: Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies (DRPT). Proc of the 4th Int Conf on IEEE 1360–1365.
Alinejad-Beromi Y, Sedighizadeh M, Bayat M, Khodayar M (2007) Using genetic alghoritm for distributed generation allocation to reduce losses and improve voltage profile. in: 42nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference, 2007, pp. 954–959.
Sedighizadeh M, Rezazadeh A (2008) Using genetic algorithm for distributed generation allocation to reduce losses and improve voltage profile. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 37:251–256
Injeti SK, Kumar NP (2011) Optimal planning of distributed generation for improved voltage stability and loss reduction. Int J Comput Appl 15:40–46
Hengsritawat V, Tayjasanant T, Nimpitiwan N (2012) Optimal sizing of photovoltaic distributed generators in a distribution system with consideration of solar radiation and harmonic distortion. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 39:36–47
Borges CLT, Falcão DM (2006) Optimal distributed generation allocation for reliability, losses, and voltage improvement. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 28:413–420
Nayeripour M, Mahboubi-Moghaddam E, Aghaei J, Azizi-Vahed A (2013) Multi-objective placement and sizing of DGs in distribution networks ensuring transient stability using hybrid evolutionary algorithm. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 25:759–767
Singh RK, Goswami SK (2010) Optimum allocation of distributed generations based on nodal pricing for profit, loss reduction, and voltage improvement including voltage rise issue. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 32:637–644
Kim JO, Park SK, Park KW, Singh C (1998) Dispersed generation planning using Improved Hereford Ranch Algorithm. in: IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98TH8360), 1998, pp. 678–683.
Lee S-H, Park J-W (2009) Selection of optimal location and size of multiple distributed generations by using kalman filter algorithm. Power Syst IEEE Trans 24:1393–1400
Jamil M, Kirmani S (2012) Optimal allocation of SPV based DG system for loss reduction and voltage improvement in radial distribution systems using approximate reasoning. In: IEEE 5th India International Conference on Power Electronics (IICPE), 2012, pp. 1–5.
Abu-Mouti F, El-Hawary M (2011) Heuristic curve-fitted technique for distributed generation optimisation in radial distribution feeder systems. IET Gener Transm Distrib 5:172–180
AlRashidi M, AlHajri M (2011) Optimal planning of multiple distributed generation sources in distribution networks: a new approach. Energy Convers Manag 52:3301–3308
Gözel T, Hocaoglu MH (2009) An analytical method for the sizing and siting of distributed generators in radial systems. Electr Power Syst Res 79:912–918
Acharya N, Mahat P, Mithulananthan N (2006) An analytical approach for dg allocation in primary distribution network. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 28:669–678
Lalitha MP, Reddy V, Usha V, Reddy NS (2010) Application of fuzzy and pso for dg placement for minimum loss in radial distribution system. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 5:32–37
Abu-Mouti FS, El-Hawary ME (2011) Optimal distributed generation allocation and sizing in distribution systems via artificial bee colony algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 26:2090–2101
Khatod DK, Pant V, Sharma J (2013) Evolutionary programming based optimal placement of renewable distributed generators. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28:683–695
Hung DQ, Mithulananthan N, Lee KY (2014) Optimal placement of dispatchable and nondispatchable renewable dg units in distribution networks for minimizing energy loss. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 55:179–186
Atwa Y, El-Saadany E (2011) Probabilistic approach for optimal allocation of wind-based distributed generation in distribution systems. IET Renew Power Gener 5:79–88
Abdelsalam AA, El-Saadany EF (2013) Probabilistic approach for optimal planning of distributed generators with controlling harmonic distortions. Gener Transm Distrib IET 7:1105–1115
Al-Sabounchi A, Gow J, Al-Akaidi M, Al-Thani H (2011) Optimal sizing and location of a PV system on three-phase unbalanced radial distribution feeder avoiding reverse power flow. in: IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conference, 2011, pp. 74-79.
Al-Sabounchi A, Gow J, Al-Akaidi M (2014) Simple procedure for optimal sizing and location of a single photovoltaic generator on radial distribution feeder. Renew Power Gener IET 8:160–170
Hung DQ, Mithulananthan N, Bansal R (2014) Integration of pv and bes units in commercial distribution systems considering energy loss and voltage stability. Appl Energy 113:1162–1170
Jain N, Singh S, Srivastava S (2013) A generalized approach for dg planning and viability analysis under market scenario. Ind Electron IEEE Trans 60:5075–5085
Rider MJ, López-Lezama JM, Contreras J, Padilha-Feltrin A (2013) Bilevel approach for optimal location and contract pricing of distributed generation in radial distribution systems using mixed-integer linear programming. Gener Transm Distrib IET 7:724–734
Zou K, Agalgaonkar AP, Muttaqi KM, Perera S (2012) Distribution system planning with incorporating dg reactive capability and system uncertainties. Sustain Energy IEEE Trans 3:112–123
Phonrattanasak P, Miyatake M, Sakamoto O (2013) Optimal location and sizing of solar farm on japan east power system using multiobjective bees algorithm. in: IEEE Energytech, 2013, pp. 1-6.
Ameli A, Bahrami S, Khazaeli F, Haghifam M-R (2014) A multiobjective particle swarm optimization for sizing and placement of dgs from dg owner’s and distribution company’s viewpoints. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 29:1831–1840
Liew PY, Theo WL, Alwi SRW, Lim JS, Manan ZA, Klemeš JJ (2016) Total site heat integration planning and design for industrial, urban and renewable systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.086
Cao Y, Wang X, Li Y, Tan Y, Xing J, Fan R (2016) A comprehensive study on low- carbon impact of distributed generations on regional power grids: a case of Jiangxi provincial power grid in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 53:766–778
Shaaban H, Elsherif A (2015) Location and Sizing of Distributed Generation Units in Primary Distribution Networks for Loss Reduction and Voltage Enhancement. in: 17th International Middle-East Power SystemsConference (MEPCON'15) Mansoura University, Egypt. 2015, pp. 35–44.
Caisheng W, Nehrir MH (2004) Analytical approaches for optimal placement of distributed generation sources in power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19:2068–2076
Maurya H, Pal NS, Bhadoria VS (2020) Performance Analysis of Optimal Placement of Multiple DGs Using PSO. Decision Analytics Applications in Industry. Springer, Singapore
Prenc R, Skrlec D, Komen V (2013) Optimal PV system placement in a distribution network on the basis of daily power consumption and production fluctuation. in: Eurocon 2013, pp. 777-783.
Rotaru F, Chicco G, Grigoras G, Cartina G (2012) Two-stage distributed generation optimal sizing with clustering-based node selection. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 40:120–129
Pesaran HAM, Mohd Zin AA, Khairuddin A, Shariati O (2014) Optimal sizing and siting of distributed generators by a weighted exhaustive search. Electr Power Compon Syst 42:1131–1142
Keane A, O’Malley M (2007) Optimal utilization of distribution networks for energy harvesting. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22:467–475
Abou El-Ela AA, Allam SM, Shatla MM (2010) Maximal optimal benefits of distributed generation using genetic algorithms. Electr Power Syst Res 80:869–877
Esmaili M (2013) Placement of minimum distributed generation units observing power losses and voltage stability with network constraints. IET Gener Transm Distrib 7:813–821
Porkar S, Poure P, Abbaspour-Tehrani-fard A, Saadate S (2010) A novel optimal distribution system planning framework implementing distributed generation in a deregulated electricity market. Electr Power Syst Res 80:828–837
Wang C, Lei S (2020) MDP-based distribution network reconfiguration with renewable distributed generation: approximate dynamic programming approach. IEEE Trans on Smart Grid 11(4):3620–3631
Vovos PN, Bialek JW (2005) Direct incorporation of fault level constraints in optimal power flow as a tool for network capacity analysis. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20:2125–2134
Vovos PN, Harrison GP, Wallace AR, Bialek JW (2005) Optimal power flow as a tool for fault level-constrained network capacity analysis. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20:734–741
Gautam D (2007) Mithulananthan N (2007) Optimal DG placement in deregulated electricity market. Electr Power Syst Res 77:1627–1636
Harrison GP, Piccolo A, Siano P, Wallace AR (2008) Hybrid GA and OPF evaluation of network capacity for distributed generation connections. Electr Power Syst Res 78:392–398
Jabr RA, Pal BC (2009) Ordinal optimisation approach for locating and sizing of distributed generation. Gener Transm Distrib IET 3:713–723
Elmitwally A (2013) A new algorithm for allocating multiple distributed generation units based on load centroid concept. Alex Eng J 52:655–663
Hedayati H, Nabaviniaki SA, Akbarimajd A (2008) A method for placement of dg units in distribution networks. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 23:1620–1628
Lai LL, Ma JT (1997) Application of evolutionary programming to reactive power planning-comparison with nonlinear programming approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 12:198–206
Silvestri A, Berizzi A, Buonanno S (1999) Distributed generation planning using genetic algorithms. in: PowerTech Budapest 99. Abstract Records. (Cat. No.99EX376), 1999, pp. 257.
Singh D, Verma KS (2009) Multiobjective optimization for dg planning with load models. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24:427–436
Kumar V, Kumar HCR, Gupta I, Gupta HO (2010) Dg integrated approach for service restoration under cold load pickup. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 25:398–406
Jen-Hao T, Tain-Syh L, Yi-Hwa L (2002) Strategic distributed generator placements for service reliability improvements. Power Engg Society Summer Meet, IEEE 2:719–724
Jin T, Tian Y, Zhang CW, Coit DW (2013) Multicriteria planning for distributed wind generation under strategic maintenance. Power Deliv IEEE Trans 28:357–367
Nara K, Hayashi Y, Ikeda K, Ashizawa T (2001) Application of tabu search to optimal placement of distributed generators. IEEE Power Engg Society Winter Meet 2:918–923
Golshan MEH, Arefifar SA (2006) Distributed generation, reactive sources and network configuration planning for power and energy-loss reduction. IEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib 153:127–136
Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan G (2001) A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. SIMULATION 76:60–68
Nekooei K, Farsangi MM, Nezamabadi-Pour H, Lee KY (2013) An improved multiobjective harmony search for optimal placement of dgs in distribution systems. Smart Grid IEEE Trans 4:557–567
Dharageshwari K and Nayanatara C (2015) Multiobjective optimal placement of multiple distributed generations. in: International Conference on Circuits, Power, and Computing Technologies [ICCPCT-2015], pp. 1-7.
Atashpaz-Gargari E, Lucas C (2007) Imperialist competitive algorithm: An algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition. in: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2007, pp. 4661-4667.
Jahani R, Hosseinzadeh A, Gharegozi A, Abadi MM (2011) Ica-based allocation of dgs in a distribution system. Am J Sci Res 33:64–75
Soroudi A, Ehsan M (2012) Imperialist competition algorithm for distributed generation connections. Gener Transm Distrib IET 2012(6):21–29
Rahmatian M, Ebrahimi E, Ghanizadeh AJ, Gharehpetian GB (2012) Optimal sitting and sizing of DG units considering islanding operation mode of sensitive loads. in: Iranian Conference on Smart Grids, 2012, pp. 1-5.
Yang J (2020) Research on Optimized Reconfiguration of Distributed Distribution Network Based on Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm. in: International Conference on Computer Engineering and Application (ICCEA), 2020, pp. 20-23.
Lalitha MP, Reddy NS, Reddy VV (2010) Optimal dg placement for maximum loss reduction in radial distribution system using ABC algorithm. International Journal of Reviews in Computing, 3:44-52.
Sohi MF, Shirdel M, Javidaneh A (2011) Applying BCO algorithm to solve the optimal DG placement and sizing problem. in: 5th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference, 2011, pp. 71-76
Kayal P, Chanda C (2013) Placement of wind and solar based dgs in distribution system for power loss minimization and voltage stability improvement. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 53:795–809
Hien NC, Mithulananthan N, Bansal RC (2013) Location and sizing of distributed generation units for loadabilty enhancement in primary feeder. IEEE Syst Jour 7:797–806
Chowdhury A, Roy R and Mandal K K (2020) Optimal allocation of wind based DG for enhancement of technical, economic & social benefits u sing Cuckoo Search Algorithm for radial distribution networks. in: International Conference on Computer, Electrical & Communication Engineering (ICCECE), 2020, pp. 1-6.
Moravej Z, Akhlaghi A (2013) A novel approach based on cuckoo search for dg allocation in distribution network. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 44:672–679
Sukraj K, Yuvaraj T, Hariharan R and Thirumalai M (2019) Simultaneous Allocation of Shunt Capacitor and Distributed Generator in Radial Distribution Network Using Modified Firefly Algorithm. in: International Conference on Smart Structures and Systems (ICSSS), 2019, pp. 1-5.
Sulaiman MH, Mustafa MW, Azmi A, Aliman O, Abdul Rahim SR (2012) Optimal allocation and sizing of distributed generation in distribution system via firefly algorithm. in: IEEE International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference Melaka, Malaysia, 2012, pp. 84-89.
Gandomkar M, Vakilian M, Ehsan M (2005) A genetic-based tabu search algorithm for optimal dg allocation in distribution networks. Electr Power Compon Syst 33:1351–1362
Moradi MH, Abedini M (2012) A combination of genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for optimal dg location and sizing in distribution systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 34:66–74
Naderi E, Seifi H, Sepasian MS (2012) A dynamic approach for distribution system planning considering distributed generation. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 27:1313–1322
Kyu-Ho K, Yu-Jeong L, Sang-Bong R, Sang-Kuen L, Seok-Ku Y (2002) Dispersed generator placement using fuzzy-ga in distribution systems. IEEE Power Eng Soc Summer Meeting 3:1148–1153
Gomez-Gonzalez M, López A, Jurado F (2012) Optimization of distributed generation systems using a new discrete PSO and OPF. Electr Power Syst Res 84:174–180
Tan WS, Hassan MY, Rahman HA, Abdullah MP, Hussin F (2013) Multi-distributed generation planning using hybrid particle swarm optimisation-gravitational search algorithm including voltage rise issue. IET Gen Transm Distrib 7:929–942
Ghosh S, Ghoshal SP, Ghosh S (2010) Optimal sizing and placement of distributed generation in a network system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 32:849–856
El-khattam W, Bhattacharya K, Hegazy Y, Salama MMA (2004) Optimal investment planning for distributed generation in a competitive electricity market. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19:1674–1684
Singh D, Singh D, Verma K (2007) Ga based optimal sizing and placement of distributed generation for loss minimization. Int J Electr Comput Eng 2:556–562
Roy K, Srivastava L, Dixit S (2020). Optimal Placement and Sizing of Distributed Generation Using Multi-Verse Optimization. in: 12th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN), 2020, pp. 268-272.
Liu H, Xu L, Zhang C (2019). Optimal allocation of distributed generation based on multi-objective ant lion algorithm. in: IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies - Asia (ISGT Asia), 2019, pp. 1455-1460.
Maurya H et al (2019) Effect of Inertia Weight of PSO on Optimal Placement of DG. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 594:012011
Bhadoria VS, Jaiswal SP, Pal NS, Shrivastava V (2022) Application of modified clonal PSO in distributed generator placement for enhancement of efficiency and voltage stability in distribution system. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 766:703-718. Springer, Singapore.
Bhadoria VS, Jaiswal SP, Pal NS, Shrivastava V (2017) Reliability improvement of distribution system by optimal sitting and sizing of disperse generation. Int J Reliability, Quality Safety Engg 24(06):1740006
Bhadoria VS, Jaiswal SP, Pal NS, Shrivastava V (2019) Artificial immune system-based approach for size and location optimization of distributed generation in distribution system. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 10:339–349
Khasanov M, Kamel S, Xie K (2019). Allocation of Distributed Generation in Radial Distribution Networks Using an Efficient Hybrid Optimization Algorithm. in: IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies - Asia (ISGT Asia), 2019, pp. 1300-1305.
Samala RK, Kotapuri MR (2020) Optimal allocation of distributed generations using hybrid technique with fuzzy logic controller radial distribution system. SN Appl Sci 2:191
Suresh MCV, Edward JB (2020) A hybrid algorithm based optimal placement of DG units for loss reduction in the distribution system. Appl Soft Comput 91:106191
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Saxena, V., Kumar, N. & Nangia, U. An Extensive Data-Based Assessment of Optimization Techniques for Distributed Generation Allocation: Conventional to Modern. Arch Computat Methods Eng 30, 675–701 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09812-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09812-w