Abstract
Solid-state perovskite solar cells (PSCs) were first discovered in 2012, where a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 9.7% was demonstrated along with stability for 500 h at ambient atmosphere. Since then, the PCEs of PSCs have increased amazingly to over 26%. Moreover, perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells achieved a PCE as high as 34%. Such a superb photovoltaic performance is due to the inherent optoelectronic properties of halide perovskites. Here, the progress of PSCs is reported following a detailed description on the discovery of PSCs. The first solid-state PSCs were based on sensitization concept using a sub-micrometer mesoporous TiO2 film whose surface was coated with nano-sized methylammonium lead iodide (MAPbI3), which had evolved to n-i-p and p-i-n planar device structures. Recent high efficiencies were mostly demonstrated using formamidinium lead iodide (FAPbI3) perovskite. To increase further the PCE to more than 30%, the current density should approach 28 mA/cm2 and fill factor 90% while keeping the voltage near 1.2 V using a perovskite with bandgap less than ~ 1.47 eV (theoretical current density = 29.4 mA/cm2). Thus, a strategy should be well established to make a defect-minimized perovskite film and the interface-engineered PSCs as well. Finally, effective methodology for improving stability of PSCs is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Since the seminal work on solid-state PSCs reported in 2012 by Park’s research group [1], halide perovskite materials and PSCs received great attention due to unconventional semiconducting properties and unprecedented light-to-electricity conversion characteristics. As a result, a certified PCE of 26.1% was achieved as of March 2024 [2], which is comparable to the PCE of a single junction silicon solar cell. The highest PCE of 33.9% was achieved by putting a PSC on top of the Si cell to construct a perovskite/Si tandem solar cell [2]. This indicates that PSCs are promising technology in the field of photovoltaics and expected to play a central role in photovoltaic market in near future.
In this report, discovery of the solid-state PSC is described, followed by recent progresses of PSCs. A brief introduction of halide perovskite structure and basic optoelectronic properties is described. Methodologies for improving efficiency and stability of PSCs are investigated. In addition, current issues for commercialization are discussed.
Discovery of Solid-State Perovskite Solar Cell
Perovskite is crystal structure with chemical formula of ABX3, where A-site cation is occupied in cubo-octahedral space by coordinating 12 X anions and B-site cation is stabilized in octahedral site by coordinating 6 X anions [3,4,5]. Figure 1a shows a schematic illustration of unit cell of perovskite. X can be oxygen, sulfur and halide, called sometimes oxide perovskite, chalcogenide perovskite and halide perovskite, respectively. Depending on the oxidation state of anions, oxidation states of A and B cations are determined. For instance, oxide perovskites can exhibit combinations of (A, B) oxidation states such as (1+, 5+), (2+, 4+), or (3+, 3+). For divalent anions, variety of elements can be A and B sites due to variety of oxidation state combinations. However, for monovalent anion such as halide, (A, B) oxidation state will be only (1+, 2+). The (2+, 1+) combination might be possible but rare because coordination number-related space should be taken into account when selecting cations.
Organic ammonium cation was first introduced in halide perovskites in 1978 [6]. Methylammonium lead trihalides (MAPbX3) were synthesized in aqueous solution at 100 °C, where aqueous Pb(NO3)2 solution was slowly added into the hot aqueous solution containing methylamine and hydro halide, which led to the crystal precipitation (Fig. 1b). This crystal growth at high temperature was unusual and no explanation was given. In 2015, high temperature crystal growth of MAPbI3 was first reproduced by Hagfeldt group, where MAPbI3 crystals were grown in a polar aprotic solvent γ-butyrolactone at 190 °C via inverse solubility [7]. This technology was further advanced and called “inverse temperature crystallization” [8]. The color of the products changed from colorless to black going from chloride to iodide. This indicates that optical bandgap is decreased with increasing halide ionic size from chloride to iodide. In the report [6], molecular motion of methylammonium cation in cubo-octahedral site was speculated to satisfy the Goldschmidt tolerance factor based on spherical ions [9] because non-spherical methylammonium ion could be a spherical shape by rotation. This assumption was proved by the quasielastic neutron scattering measurements in 2015 [10].
Report on the synthesis of MAPbX3 perovskites in 1978 induced further research on their phase transition [11] and thermodynamic properties [12]. However, there was no reports on perovskite photovoltaics until the conference report on the perovskite-sensitized solar cell presented by Miyasaka at Nanoeuro 2007 in St. Gallen, Switzerland in 2007. Sensitization of halide perovskite MAPbI3 nanocrystal on a mesoporous 8–10 μm-thick TiO2 film generated a power conversion efficiency of 3.8% [13], where a polar liquid electrolyte (0.15 M LiI and 0.075 M I2 dissolved in methoxyacetonitrile) was still employed. Since halide perovskite tends to be dissolved in the presence of polar liquid electrolyte, the perovskite-sensitized solar cell with acetonitrile-based liquid electrolyte is quite unstable because of dissolution of the perovskite in polar solvent (polarity of acetonitrile is 11.8). Less polar solvent is thus expected to improve stability of perovskite. Park’s group modified electrolyte using a less polar solvent of ethyl acetate (polarity is 8.6), which was applied to a MAPbI3-sensitized solar cell and demonstrated higher PCE of 6.5% [14]. In addition, a reproducible recipe to prepare the perovskite precursor solution was provided in ref. 14, where the perovskite was reproducibly formed using a high concentration (40%) precursor solution based on the study of dependence of external quantum efficiency (EQE) on the precursor concentration ranging from 10 to 40%. Nevertheless, the less polar ethyl acetate-based electrolyte was not enough to protect dissolution of perovskite. This means that halide perovskite cannot be used as a light absorber in the presence of polar liquid electrolyte. To solve this problem, two methods have been considered: one is wrapping the perovskite with hydrophobic materials and the other is replacing the liquid electrolyte with solid hole conducting materials (HTMs). The first idea was not successful because of poor contact with electrolyte due to the presence of hydrophobic yet insulating barrier between electrolyte and perovskite. The second idea of using a HTM instead of liquid electrolyte was indeed successful. Since we used a mesoporous TiO2 film whose surface was covered by the perovskite nanocrystals, molecular type HTM was better than polymeric HTM in terms of infiltration of HTM in the randomly connected mesopores. Spiro-MeOTAD (often, spiro-OMeTAD) molecular HTM was confirmed to be successfully infiltrated into the mesoporous TiO2 film, where the submicrometer-thick TiO2 film was sufficient because of high absorption coefficient of MAPbI3 exceeding 104 cm−1 [14]. A PCE of 9.7% was achieved from the spiro-MeOTAD/MAPbI3 junction at 600 nm-thick TiO2 film, where stability with unencapsulated device was shown for 500 h [1]. To understand change separation mechanism of the solid-state PSCs, femtosecond transient absorption study was performed. Interestingly, the same bleaching at 480 nm and positive peak at around 640 nm were observed for both Al2O3 and TiO2 (Fig. 2a and b). When considering that the conduction band position of Al2O3 is higher than that of MAPbI3, the similar spectral response for the TiO2/MAPbI3 junction indicates that electron injection from perovskite to TiO2 is hard to occur. On the other hands, the excited state of MAPbI3 is rapidly quenched in the presence of spiro-MeOTAD HTM (Fig. 2c and d), which indicates that hole is separated quickly by spiro-MeOTAD. Based on the transient absorption study, excited electrons in MAPbI3 are likely to be transported through the thin layer of MAPbI3 on the TiO2 surface, which might be formed during spin-coating and hard to be detected by electron microscopy, and holes are injected to spiro-MeOTAD. This charge separation mechanism in the scaffold-oxide-based solid-state PSCs was clearly observed by FTO/Al2O3/MAPbI3/spiro-MeOTAD device configuration [15].
The seminal report on the stable solid-state PSCs triggered perovskite photovoltaic research, which indeed leads to a certified PCE over 26% [16], where maximum short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc), open-circuit voltage (Voc) and fill factor (FF) was 26.13 mA/cm2, 1.201 V and 85.2%, respectively. This achievement surpasses the PCEs of CIGS (23.6%) and CdTe (22.4%) solar cells and is comparable to the PCE of crystalline Si solar cells (26.0–26.7% depending on p- or n-type characteristics and device structures). In Fig. 3, the EQE spectra and J–V curves for the record efficiency PSCs are shown depending on aperture area (26.1% from 0.05 cm2 and 25.2% from 1.03 cm2) are presented. It is worth noting that EQE remains above 90% across almost the entire wavelength ranging from 400 to 800 nm.
Methodologies that Contributed to the Improvement of Efficiencies
PSCs can be made by either n-i-p or p-i-n structures, where the p-i-n structure is also called an inverted PSC. As can be seen in Fig. 4a, electron transporting layer (ETL) is deposited on a transparent conducting oxide (TCO) substrate, such as fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO), to make the n-i-p PSCs, where hole transporting layer (HTL) like spiro-MeOTAD is required on top of the perovskite film. For constructing the p-i-n PSCs in Fig. 4b, a HTL is first placed on a TCO substrate and a PCBM/C60 layer can be used as an ETL, where PCBM (phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester) is C60 derivative. Except for spiro-MeOTAD and PCBM/C60, various materials were studied for ETL and HTL [5, 17,18,19,20]. It is recommended to prepare highly transparent ETL or HTL in the n-i-p or the p-i-n PSCs for the perovskite layer to absorb the incoming light without absorption by HTL and ETL.
Defect-less high-quality perovskite film is prerequisite for high efficiency. Spin-coating method is frequently used to deposit the perovskite film. However, a rapid evaporation of the solvent during the spin-coating leads to a fast crystallization of perovskite film, which indeed results in small grains with poor crystallinity. To improve crystallinity with large grains, kinetic control is necessarily required via intermediate formation. Since a perovskite precursor solution contains polar aprotic solvents, commonly dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and dimethyl formamide (DMF) because PbI2 and MAI for MAPbI3 can be dissolved in such the polar aprotic solvents. DMSO and DMF can act as Lewis base because of lone pairs on oxygen atom, where basicity is higher for DMSO (donor number (DN) = 26.5) than DMF (DN = 22.4) [21], and PbI2 acts as Lewis acid (Fig. 5a). Interaction between Lewis acid and base leads to an adduct because of further stabilized lone pair in molecular orbital of the adduct (Fig. 5b). Selective removal of the DMF solvent by dripping diethyl ether while spinning was found to form a colorless MAI·PbI2·DMSO adduct intermediate as shown in Fig. 5c, where DMSO can be controlled by mild heating due to rather weak chemical interaction with Lewis acids. Two-step heating can remove DMSO from the intermediate and thereby form a high quality MAPbI3 [22]. The adduct-process eventually contributed significantly to improving PCE of PSCs.
Another approach is composition engineering. MAPbI3 for the first solid-state PSCs has a bandgap of about 1.55 eV, which means that the minimum light energy to excite electrons from the valence band of MAPbI3 required wavelength of about 800 nm (1240/1.55 = 800). Replacing MA+ with FA+ lowers band gap to about 1.47 eV. Thus, FAPbI3-based PSCs might achieve higher PCE due to more Jsc than MAPbI3 because of extension of light absorption up to 843 nm. In Fig. 6a and b, calculated XRD patterns are depicted for MAPbI3 and FAPbI3 at 298 K. FAPbI3 is known to phase transformation from high-temperature-stabilized α phase (black color, perovskite structure) to low-temperature-stabilized δ phase (yellow color, non-perovskite structure) as shown in Fig. 6c. It was observed that δ-FAPbI3 could be rapidly converted to α-FAPbI3 at 185 °C within 2 min, while α-to-δ phase transition took 10 days at room temperature [23]. This indicates that α-FAPbI3 is unstable at room temperature, which might be due to large cation size of FA+ compared to MA+. To stabilize α-FAPbI3 even at room temperature, introduction of smaller cation in FA+ site is required. We eventually solved this problem by replacing 10% of FA cation with Cs cation, leading to a nominal composition of FA0.9Cs0.1PbI3 [24]. Figure 6d shows that 10 mol% Cs incorporation is sufficient to stabilize α phase at low temperature without requiring energy for δ-to-α transition as confirmed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurement. Thus, Cs cation acts as a kind of stabilizer. This work triggered research on multiple cation PSCs [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Adduct intermediate process and composition engineering have indeed contributed to improving efficiency of PSCs.
Future Research Directions for Improving Efficiencies
Strategies for Improving Efficiency
In Fig. 7, PCEs of PSCs are displayed with respect to band gap (Eg) of the corresponding perovskite compositions of MAPbI3, (Rb/Cs/MA)1−xFAxPb(I0.84Br0.16)3 (0.75 < x < 0.8), MA1−xFAxPb[Iy(Br/HCOO)1−y]3 (0.95 ≤ x, y ≤ 1), and (MDA/Cs)1−xFAxPbI3 (0.96 < x ≤ 0.97), where MDA represents methylenediammonium cation (MDA2+) [31]. The data were based on the best achievement up to 2022. The composition of MA1−xFAxPb[Iy(Br/HCOO)1−y]3 (0.95 ≤ x, y ≤ 1) is symbolized with green circle and (MDA/Cs)1−xFAxPbI3 (0.96 < x ≤ 0.97) with red triangle in Fig. 7. It is worth to note that overall efficiency might not depend on Eg because similar PCEs of 25% were obtained with Eg from 1.47 to 1.56 eV, which corresponds to 80% of S–Q limit (see Fig. 7a). However, when investigating photovoltaic parameters more in detail (Fig. 7b–d), the pure iodide system of (MDA/Cs)1−xFAxPbI3 shows a gap in Jsc between the observed values and the S–Q limit (Fig. 7b), while there is a gap in Voc for the mixed halide composition of MA1−xFAxPb[Iy(Br/HCOO)1−y]3 (Fig. 7c). This underlines that pure iodide composition with smaller Eg needs to increase Jsc further, whereas further increase in Voc is required for the mixed halide composition with relatively larger Eg. This also indicates that effective trap density might be dependent on perovskite composition when considering trap density–Voc relation. Thus, research direction toward higher PCE seems to be different depending on perovskite composition.
Facet-Dependent Photocurrent
As aforementioned strategy for improving further PCE by increasing Jsc or Voc depending on perovskite composition, we have been interested in methodologies to increase Jsc of pure iodide system such as FA1−xCsxPbI3. While exploring an effective method, we are motivated by the report on inhomogeneity of photocurrent on the perovskite surface measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM) under illumination [32], where this inhomogeneity was speculated to be related to crystal facet. However, the facets could not be distinguished from the perovskite film surface [32]. Thus, we wanted to prepare a perovskite film showing clear facets, which was realized via additive engineering [33]. In Fig. 8, compared with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the perovskite film prepared by a conventional precursor solution containing FAPbI3 and MACl (Fig. 8a), the addition of piperidine additive into the precursor solution significantly changes perovskite film morphology showing clearly (100) and (111) crystal facets (Fig. 8b). With the perovskite film having the (100) and (111) facets, surface photocurrent was investigated using AFM under illumination (Fig. 8c). Interestingly, the (100) facet showed highest photocurrent of about 230 pA and a little bit lower, yet comparable photocurrent (~ 170 pA) was observed from the (111) facet (Fig. 8d). On the other hand, the perovskite surface dominated with (110) facet exhibited extremely poor photocurrent (~ 26 pA). This clearly demonstrated facet-dependent photocurrent, which was explained by the exciton generation rate [33]. As expected, the (100)/(111) enhanced perovskite film showed much higher PCE than the (110) enhanced one (Fig. 8e and f). This work can give an important insight into perovskite film design for high PCE.
Homogenizing Cations in the Perovskite Films
In order to improve Jsc via enhancing charge extraction capability, well-matched band alignment is required. As aforementioned, a small amount of Cs cation is required to stabilize α phase FAPbI3. In this case, phase purity in the entire FA1−xCsxPbI3 film is highly required. However, FA and Cs cations might not be homogeneously distributed across the perovskite film. Time-of-flight secondary-ion mass spectroscopy (ToF–SIMS) measurements reveal that the perovskite film prepared by the conventional precursor solution showed inhomogeneous out-of-plane cation distribution [34], where FA-rich composition was formed on the top surface whereas Cs-rich composition was made on the bottom of the film (Fig. 9a). Such an inhomogeneous cation distribution across the film might be due to difference in crystallization and phase transition kinetics to form perovskite phase with FA and Cs cation. Moreover, charge transport is affected by the inhomogeneity because of difference in band positions between FAPbI3 and CsPbI3, which can have ill influence on photovoltaic performance. 1-(Phenylsulfonyl)pyrrole (PSP) was synthesized to use as an additive for controlling kinetics (Fig. 9b). Thanks to the similar dimension between molecular PSP and I–Pb–I and the chemical interaction between PSP with δ+–δ−–δ+ (δ− for sulfonyl group and δ+ for phenyl and pyrrole group) and I–Pb–I, PSP successfully controlled crystallization and phase transition kinetics. This eventually homogenized FA and Ca cations in the entire film, leading to carrier extraction equilibrium and higher PCE exceeding 26%.
Future research Directions for Improving Stability
Facet-Dependent Moisture Stability
3D halide perovskite is known to be unstable under moisture environment. However, the origin of such a moisture instability has not been well understood. Besides ionic nature of halide perovskite, we have been motivated to investigate facet-dependent moisture stability since water adsorption might be expected to depend on facets due to different surface charge and energy. As shown in Fig. 10a, the (100)/(111) enhanced perovskite film, prepared by the aforementioned piperidine additive [33], was exposed to 40% relative humidity (RH) for 200 h, from which the (100) facet was found to be seriously degraded, whereas the (111) facet was quite stable [35]. Based on the confocal PL measurement for the 200 h-exposed film (Fig. 10b), PL emission was observed from the (111) facet, while no PL emission was detected on the (100) facet. This indicates that the moisture turned the (100) facet a non-perovskite phase. To further validate the changes after exposure, photocurrent-AFM was measured. The degraded (100) facet by moisture could not generate photocurrent and the degraded (100) facet was confirmed to be non-perovskite δ phase (Fig. 10c), accompanied by change in the layer height due to the phase change. On the other hand, no change in both photocurrent and height was observed for the (111) facet (Fig. 10d). This confirms again that (111) facet is moisture tolerant. Since we discovered the facet-dependent moisture stability and moisture-tolerant (111) facet, the (111)-dominated perovskite film was expected to improve moisture stability. For this purpose, cyclohexylamine with two hydrogens was selected to use as an additive (Fig. 10e), which led to 85–98% of the (111) facets based on the exposed-area percentage calculation (Fig. 10f). As expected, the (111)-dominant film-based PSCs without encapsulation was more stable than the PSCs based on the (100)/(111) mixed facet under 30–40% RH condition (Fig. 10g). Since efficiency and stability were found to be strongly dependent on crystal facet, facet engineering is important research topic toward stable and higher efficiency PSCs [33]. In addition to the moisture stability, phase stability of especially FAPbI3 is of critical in achieving the stable PSCs. Regarding phase stability of the perovskite layer, kinetic and thermodynamic stability of FAPbI3 is involved, which should be carefully investigated, well understood and managed by specific methodologies [31, 36, 37].
Interface Engineering for Improving Operational Stability
The weak adhesion can exist at the charge transport layer (CTL)/perovskite interface due to the composition inhomogeneity and the strain in the perovskite layer [38,39,40]. This inhomogeneity might cause a weak homojunction of perovskite adjacent to the CTLs [41]. Since there is possibility of workfunction (WF) difference at the perovskite homojunction with weak adhesion and thus the weak adhesion interface can have ill influence on stability, regulating WF is required to improve the stability. It is then questioned how we determine WF of the weak homojunction of perovskite layer near the CTL. For the n-i-p structure with a SnO2 CTL, peeling off the perovskite layer from the SnO2-coated FTO substrate might be a reasonable method to determine the WF of the weak adhesion homojunction. Figure 11a shows a peeling off the perovskite layer from the SnO2-coated FTO substrate, where the perovskite could not be completely peeled off from the SnO2 layer, instead, a thin perovskite layer was still adhered on the SnO2 layer [42]. The surface on the bottom of the perovskite film and the upper surface of the SnO2 film were labeled “surface A” and “surface B,” respectively. WF of the surface A and the surface B was determined to be 4.23 eV and 3.88 eV, respectively, using Kelvin probe force microscope (KPFM) (Fig. 11b). The difference in WF is indicative of existence of homojunction. Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) in Fig. 11c shows a similar ∆WF observed by the KPFM measurements. WF of the surface A shifted further to 4.47 eV after photovoltaic operation for 50 h (Fig. 11b), which might be due to decomposition and/or change in structural phase of perovskite at the weak homojunction under illumination.
To solve the problem of the change in WF after operation, a siloxane-based self-assembled molecule (SAM) was introduced in between the SnO2 layer and the perovskite layer, where one should carefully consider the functionality of the terminal group. We selected electron-withdrawing nitrile group to passivate the defect, mostly iodide vacancy, at the bottom of the perovskite and enhance the adhesion of the buried interface (Fig. 11d). Compared with other electron-withdrawing group, like Cl, Br and I, at the terminal position of silane derivatives, density functional theory (DFT) calculation revealed that interface adhesion energy was higher for the nitrile group than for the halogen group. KPFM measurement in Fig. 11e showed a negligible difference in ∆WF before and after operation for the SAM-modified sample due to the energy-level alignment by the introduction of the SAM. As a result, photostability of PSCs was significantly improved as shown in Fig. 11f, demonstrating 97% of the initial PCE was maintained after 1000 h-maximum-power-point-tracking (MPPT).
Conclusions and Perspectives
In this review, the historical background of the solid-state perovskite solar cell discovery was described in detail. The significant improvement in PCE of PSCs from 9.7 to 26.1% were realized thanks to the three major contributions. The Lewis acid–base adduct approach contributed to preparing high quality perovskite films. Additives in the perovskite precursor solutions played important role in controlling crystallization kinetics and grain size, which contributed to reduction of bulk and grain boundary defects. Interface engineering contributed equally to improving photovoltaic performance. Since the interface engineering contributed also to improving stability of PSCs, more studies are required for interface engineering. In PSCs, regardless of n-i-p and p-i-n type, three important interfaces, perovskite/ETL, perovskite/HTL and grain boundary, should be well passivated. Both organic and inorganic materials can be candidates for interface passivation, where selection rule for choosing the materials is required to be developed to reduce trial and error. From the industrial point of view, precursor materials seem to be issued in case of mass production of PSCs. Thus, economic ways to produce high quality precursor materials for PSCs are needed to be developed. For instance, aqueous synthesis of highly pure perovskite precursors is a good example [43].
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
H.-S. Kim, C.-R. Lee, J.-H. Im, K.-B. Lee, T. Moehl, A. Marchioro, S.-J. Moon, R. Humphry-Baker, J.-H. Yum, J.E. Moser, M. Grätzel, N.-G. Park, Sci. Rep. 2, 591 (2012)
NREL best research-cell efficiency chart. https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html. Accessed 6 June 2024
N.-G. Park, Mater. Today 18, 65 (2015)
N.-G. Park, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 2423 (2013)
H.S. Jung, N.-G. Park, Small 11, 10 (2015)
D. Weber, Z. Naturforsch. 33b, 1443 (1978)
J.M. Kadro, K. Nonomura, D. Gachet, M. Grätzel, A. Hagfeldt, Sci. Rep. 5, 11654 (2015)
M.I. Saidaminov, A.L. Abdelhady, B. Murali, E. Alarousu, V.M. Burlakov, W. Peng, I. Dursun, L. Wang, Y. He, G. Maculan, A. Goriely, T. Wu, O.F. Mohammed, O.M. Bakr, Nat. Commun. 6, 7586 (2015)
V.M. Goldschmidt, Naturwissenschaften 14, 477 (1926)
A. Leguy, J. Frost, A. McMahon et al., Nat. Commun. 6, 7124 (2015)
A. Poglitsch, D. Weber, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 6373–6378 (1987)
N. Onoda-Yamamuro, T. Matsuo, H. Suga, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 51, 1383–1395 (1990)
A. Kojima, K. Teshima, Y. Shirai, T. Miyasaka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 6050–6051 (2009)
J.-H. Im, C.-R. Lee, J.-W. Lee, S.-W. Park, N.-G. Park, Nanoscale 3, 4088 (2011)
M.M. Lee, J. Teuscher, T. Miyasaka, T.N. Murakami, H.J. Snaith, Science 338, 643 (2012)
M.A. Green, E.D. Dunlop, M. Yoshita, N. Kopidakis, K. Bothe, G. Siefer, X. Hao, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 32, 3 (2024)
C. Zhang, K. Wei, J. Hu, X. Cai, G. Du, J. Deng, Z. Luo, X. Zhang, Y. Wang, L. Yang, J. Zhang, A review on organic materials for HTL. Mater. Today 67, 518 (2023)
L. Zang, C. Zhao, X. Hu, J. Tao, S. Chen, J. Chu, A review on inorganic and organic materials for ETL. Small 20, 2400807 (2024)
X. Jing, Z. Zhang, T. Chen, J. Luo, A review on inorganic materials for HTL. Energy Technol. 11, 2201005 (2023)
Y. Yao, C. Cheng, C. Zhang, H. Hu, K. Wang, S. De Wolf, A review on organic HTLs for inverted (p-i-n) PSCs. Adv. Mater. 34, 2203794 (2022)
M. Katayama, M. Shinoda, K. Ozutsumi, S. Funahashi, Y. Inada, Anal. Sci. 28, 103 (2012)
N. Ahn, D.-Y. Son, I.-H. Jang, S.M. Kang, M. Choi, N.-G. Park, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 8696 (2015)
Q. Han, S.-H. Bae, P. Sun, Y.-T. Hsieh, Y.M. Yang, Y.S. Rim, H. Zhao, Q. Chen, W. Shi, G. Li, Y. Yang, Adv. Mater. 28, 2253 (2016)
J.-W. Lee, D.-H. Kim, H.-S. Kim, S.-W. Seo, S.M. Cho, N.-G. Park, Adv. Energy Mater. 15, 1501310 (2015)
M. Saliba, T. Matsui, J.-Y. Seo, K. Domanski, J.-P. Correa-Baena, M.K. Nazeeruddin, S.M. Zakeeruddin, W.R. Tress, A. Abate, A. Hagfeldt, M. Grätzel, Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 1989 (2016)
M. Saliba, T. Matsui, K. Domanski, J.-Y. Seo, A. Ummadisingu, S.M. Zakeeruddin, J.-P. Correa-Baena, W.R. Tress, A. Abate, A. Hagfeldt, M. Grätzel, Science 354, 206 (2016)
M. Stolterfoht, C.M. Wolff, Y. Amir, A. Paulke, L. Perdigón-Toro, P. Caprioglio, D. Neher, Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 1530 (2017)
M.A. Mahmud, N.K. Elumalai, M.B. Upama, D. Wang, A.M. Soufiani, M. Wright, C. Xu, F. Haque, A. Uddin, A.C.S. Appl, Mater. Interfaces 9, 33841 (2017)
H.X. Dang, K. Wang, M. Ghasemi, M.-C. Tang, M. De Bastiani, E. Aydin, E. Dauzon, D. Barrit, J. Peng, D.-M. Smilgies, S. De Wolf, A. Amassian, Joule 3, 1746 (2019)
W. Chen, Y. Zhou, L. Wang, Y. Wu, B. Tu, B. Yu, F. Liu, H.-W. Tam, G. Wang, A.B. Djurišić, L. Huang, Z. He, Adv. Mater. 30, 1800515 (2018)
H.-S. Kim, N.-G. Park, Adv. Mater. 35, 2204807 (2023)
S.Y. Leblebici, L. Leppert, Y. Li, S.E. Reyes-Lillo, S. Wickenburg, E. Wong, J. Lee, M. Melli, D. Ziegler, D.K. Angell, D.F. Ogletree, P.D. Ashby, F.M. Toma, J.B. Neaton, I.D. Sharp, A. Weber-Bargioni, Nat. Energy 1, 16093 (2016)
C. Ma, M.-C. Kang, S.-H. Lee, S.J. Kwon, H.-W. Cha, C.-W. Yang, N.-G. Park, Joule 6, 2626 (2022)
Z. Liang, Y. Zhang, H. Xu, W. Chen, B. Liu, J. Zhang, H. Zhang, Z. Wang, D.-H. Kang, J. Zeng, X. Gao, Q. Wang, H. Hu, H. Zhou, X. Cai, X. Tian, P. Reiss, B. Xu, T. Kirchartz, Z. Xiao, S. Dai, N.-G. Park, J. Ye, X. Pan, Nature 624, 557 (2023)
C. Ma, F.T. Eickemeyer, S.-H. Lee, D.-H. Kang, S.J. Kwon, M. Grätzel, N.-G. Park, Science 379, 173 (2023)
S. Shin, S. Seo, S. Jeong, A.S. Sharbirin, J. Kim, H. Ahn, N.-G. Park, H. Shin, Adv. Sci. 10, 2300798 (2023)
Y. Zhang, T. Yang, S.-U. Lee, S. Liu, K. Zhao, N.-G. Park, ACS Energy Lett. 9, 159 (2023)
N. Rolston, A.D. Printz, J.M. Tracy, H.C. Weerasinghe, D. Vak, L.J. Haur, A. Priyadarshi, N. Mathews, D.J. Slotcavage, M.D. McGehee, R.E. Kalan, K. Zielinski, R.L. Grimm, H. Tsai, W. Nie, A.D. Mohite, S. Gholipour, M. Saliba, M. Grätzel, R.H. Dauskardt, Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1702116 (2018)
C. Zhu, X. Niu, Y. Fu, N. Li, C. Hu, Y. Chen, X. He, G. Na, P. Liu, H. Zai, Y. Ge, Y. Lu, X. Ke, Y. Bai, S. Yang, P. Chen, Y. Li, M. Sui, L. Zhang, H. Zhou, Q. Chen, Nat. Commun. 10, 815 (2019)
W. Meng, K. Zhang, A. Osvet, J. Zhang, W. Gruber, K. Forberich, B. Meyer, W. Heiss, T. Unruh, N. Li, C.J. Brabec, Joule 6, 458 (2022)
S. Tan, T. Huang, I. Yavuz, R. Wang, T.W. Yoon, M. Xu, Q. Xing, K. Park, D.-K. Lee, C.H. Chen, R. Zheng, T. Yoon, Y. Zhao, H.-C. Wang, D. Meng, J. Xue, Y.J. Song, X. Pan, N.-G. Park, J.-W. Lee, Y. Yang, Nature 605, 268 (2022)
C. Zhang, Y. Son, H. Kim, S.-H. Lee, X. Liang, G. Fu, S.-U. Lee, D.-A. Park, Q. Jiang, K. Zhu, N.-G. Park, Joule 8, 1 (2024)
P. Zhu, D. Wang, Y. Zhang, Z. Liang, J. Li, J. Zeng, J. Zhang, Y. Xu, S. Wu, Z. Liu, X. Zhou, B. Hu, F. He, L. Zhang, X. Pan, X. Wang, N.-G. Park, B. Xu, Science 383, 524 (2024)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Challengeable Future Defense Technology Research and Development Program through the Agency for Defense Development (ADD) funded by the Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) in 2024 (No. 912765601).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
There is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, NG. Towards Stable, 30% Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. Korean J. Chem. Eng. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-024-00222-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-024-00222-1