Abstract
Land desertification and aeolian activity are currently the greatest threats to alpine ecological environments and are also the primary challenges of desertification control and ecological restoration projects. Afforestation of sandy lands around the Qinghai Lake in China has effectively controlled the desertification of this watershed. However, certain issues remain which challenge its overall success, including lack of diverse biological species and poor theoretical understanding of aeolian processes, such as controlling wind-sand flow in relation to complex alpine ecological factors. Therefore, to help improving afforestation techniques, this research focused on Hippophae rhamnoides, Salix cheilophila, Pinus sylvestris, Populus simonii and Artemisia desertorum vegetation implanted in the mobile dunes on the eastern shore of Qinghai Lake. Aeolian transport characteristics and annual changes to community ecological factors from 2010–2016 were monitored in comparison with uncontrolled sand dunes. Based on simultaneous observations using gradient anemometers and sand samplers, it was found that the aeolian activities exhibited the following features: 1) In re-vegetated lands, the logarithmic growth of wind speed was disrupted by the wind speed amplification in the middle and high layers and wind speed reduction in the low layers, while vegetation had significant wind-breaking (> 37%) and sand-fixing (> 85%) effects in 2016. 2) Wind speeds in re-vegetated lands and mobile dunes showed a linear correlation, especially in lower layers of H. rhamnoides and S. cheilophila, while sand transport in re-vegetated land increased linearly or exponentially with increasing wind speed. 3) The four artificial shrubs and forests had greater sand deposition with intensities of 280–860 t/(ha·yr), largely concentrated during winter and spring which accounted for 60%–85% of the annual cycle, while A. desertorum experienced significant root undercutting; and 4) Intensity of aeolian activity in re-vegetated lands, except for A. desertorum, was significantly negative with respect to plant growth structure, community cover, topsoil moisture, and regional precipitation. Overall, these five sand-binding species produced optimistic wind-sand protection effects for the alpine sandy lands, which relied on the plants’ physical disturbance of wind-sand flow during the early stages of community development. In comparison, H. rhamnoides and S. cheilophila individually maintained stable wind-sand protection effects, while P. sylvestris and P. simonii were better in mixing with other shrubs and herbs to achieve a comprehensive ecological system for future control of aeolian activity.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allgaier A, 2008. Aeolian sand transport and vegetation cover. In: Breckle S W, Yair A, Veste M (eds). Arid Dune Ecosystems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 211–224. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75498-5_15
Arens S M, 1996. Patterns of sand transport on vegetated foredunes. Geomorphology, 17(4): 339–350. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-555X(96)00016-5
Buckley R, 1987. The effect of sparse vegetation on the transport of dune sand by wind. Nature, 325(6103): 426–428. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/325426a0
Burri K, Gromke C, Lehning M et al., 2011. Aeolian sediment transport over vegetation canopies: a wind tunnel study with live plants. Aeolian Research, 3(2): 205–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2011.01.003
Ci L J, Liu Y H, 2010. Biological and technical approaches to control windy desertification. In: Desertification and Its Control in China. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 351–426. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01869-5_8
Di W J, Zhang Y C, He L et al., 2018. Selection of plant species for windbreak and sand fixation and selection principles of tree species. Agriculture & Technology, 38(22): 216. (in Chinese)
Ewane B E, Lee H H, 2017. Influence of vegetation cover and other sources of variability on sediment and runoff response in a burned forest in South Korea. Journal of Mountain Science, 14(2): 296–315. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4094-0
Greene D F, 1989. Focus: disturbance and vegetation response: a biogeographical perspective II. The Canadian Geographer, 33(1):78–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.1989.tb00889.x
He L X Z, 2018. Investigations on Root Characteristics and Functions for Typical Sand-Fixation Plantations in Gonghe-Basin, Qinghai. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry. (in Chinese)
Leenders J K, Sterk G, van Boxel J H, 2011. Modelling windblown sediment transport around single vegetation elements. Earth Surface Processes & Landforms, 36(9): 1218–1229. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.2147
Li Kaichong, Xue Chunxiao, Jiang Fuqiang et al., 2014a. Research on the different characteristics of sand-drift between Gobi and Plateau. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, (7): 7–11. (in Chinese)
Li Q X, Jia Z Q, Liu T et al., 2017. Effects of different plantation types on soil properties after vegetation restoration in an alpine sandy land on the Tibetan Plateau, China. Journal of Arid Land, 9(2): 200–209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-017-0006-6
Li Q X, Yang D F, Jia Z Q et al., 2019. Changes in soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks along a chronosequence of Caraganaintermedia plantations in alpine sandy land. Ecological Engineering, 133: 53–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.03.003
Li Shaohua, 2018. Study on Improvement of Soil Quality under Vegetation Restoration in Alpine Sandy Land. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry. (in Chinese)
Li Xinrong, Zhang Zhishan, Lei Huang et al., 2013. Review of the ecohydrological processes and feedback mechanisms controlling sand-binding vegetation systems in sandy desert regions of China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 58(13): 1483–1496. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-012-5662-5
Li Xinrong, Zhang Zhishan, Tan Huijuan et al., 2014b. Ecological restoration and recovery in the wind-blown sand hazard areas of northern China: relationship between soil water and carrying capacity for vegetation in the Tengger Desert. Science China Life Sciences, 57(5): 539–548. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-014-4633-2
Liu Tongxu, 2019. Ntroduction and cultivation of sand-fixing plants and test analysis of drought-resistant afforestation technology. Water Sciences and Engineering Technology, (3): 87–90. (in Chinese)
McIntyre S, Lavorel S, Landsberg J et al., 1999. Disturbance response in vegetation-towards a global perspective on functional trait. Journal of Vegetation Science, 10(5): 621–630. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3237077
Moulton M A B, Hesp P A, da Silva G M et al., 2019. Changes in vegetation cover on the Younghusband Peninsula transgressive dunefields (Australia) 1949–2017. Earth Surface Processes & Landforms, 44(2): 459–470. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4508
Musick H B, Trujillo S M, Truman C R, 1996. Wind-tunnel modelling of the influence of vegetation structure on saltation threshold. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 21(7): 589–605. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-9837(199607)21:7<589::aid-esp659>3.0.co;2-1
Nicoll B C, Ray D, 1996. Adaptive growth of tree root systems in response to wind action and site conditions. Tree Physiology, 16(11–12): 891–898. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/16.11-12.891
Okin G S, 2008. A new model of wind erosion in the presence of vegetation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 113(F2): F02S10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000758
Pasternak D, Schlissel A, 2001. Combating Desertification with Plants. Boston, MA: Springer.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1327-8
Pye K, Tsoar H, 2009. Management and human use of sand dune environments. In: Aeolian Sand & Sand Dunes. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 329–367. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85910-9_9.
Raupach M R, Lu H, 2004. Representation of land-surface processes in aeolian transport models. Environmental Modelling & Software, 19(2): 93–112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-8152(03)00113-0
Tian Lihui, WuWangyang, Zhang Dengshan et al. Airflow field around Hippophae rhamnoides in alpine semi-arid desert. Land, 2020, 9(5). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/land9050140
Walter B, Voegeli C, Horender S, 2017. Estimating sediment mass fluxes on surfaces sheltered by live vegetation. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 163(2): 273–286. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0224-z
Wang Z Y, Lee J H W, Melching C S, 2015. Vegetation-erosion dynamics. In: River Dynamics and Integrated River Management. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 53–122, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25652-3_3
Wolfe S A, Nickling W G, 1993. The protective role of sparse vegetation in wind erosion. Progress in Physical Geography, 17(1): 50–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/030913339301700104
Wu Wangyang, Zhang Dengshan, Tian Lihui et al., 2018. Morphologic features and forming causes of plant sandpiles in alpine sand land. Arid Zone Research, 35(3): 713–721. (in Chinese)
Wu Wangyang, Zhang Dengshan, Tian Lihui et al., 2019. Features of artificial plant communities from the east sand region of the Qinghai Lake over the last 10 years. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(6): 2109–2121. (in Chinese)
Yang Hongwen, Zhang Dengshan, Zhang Yongxiu, 1997. Land desertification in Qinghai high cold region and its control. Journal of Desert Research, 17(2): 185–188. (in Chinese)
Yang Kaiyue, Jia Zhiqing, Li Qingxue et al., 2019. Soil water dynamics and its response to rainfall in typical plantation of alpine sandy land. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 28(9): 1757–1766. (in Chinese)
Zhang Chunlai, Zhou Na, Zhang Jiaqiong, 2014a. Sand flux and wind profiles in the saltation layer above a rounded dune top. Science China Earth Sciences, 57(3): 523–533. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-013-4672-8
Zhang Jingguang, Li Xinrong, Wang Xinping et al., 2004. Ecological adaptation strategies of annual plants in artificial vegetation-stabilized sand dune in Shapotou Region. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 47(1): 50–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1360/04zd0006
Zhang X, Yu G Q, Li Z B et al., 2014b. Experimental study on slope runoff, erosion and sediment under different vegetation types. Water Resources Management, 28(9): 2415–2433. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0603-5
Zhang Yabin, Liu Wenxiao, Lv Xiaoxing, 2017. Study on the characteristics of sand hazards in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and its difference with Xinjiang. China Building Materials Science & Technology, 26(3): 84–85. (in Chinese)
Zhao Halin, Li Jin, Zhou Ruilian et al., 2015. Response of the growth and photosynthetic properties of Pinus sylvestris vat. mongolica saplings to strong wind-sand flow blowing. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 35(3): 546–552. (in Chinese)
Zhao Peiyi, Tuo Debao, Li Huanchun et al., 2012. Effects of soil moisture and physical sand content on wind erosion modulus in wind tunnel testing. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 28(24): 188–195. (in Chinese)
Zuazo V H D, Pleguezuelo C R R, 2008. Soil-erosion and runoff prevention by plant covers. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 28(1): 65–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2007062
Zuo X A, Zhao X Y, Wang S K et al., 2012. Influence of dune stabilization on relationship between plant diversity and productivity in Horqin Sand Land, Northern China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 67(5): 1547–1556. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1950-2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item
Under the auspices of the Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of East China University of Technology (DHBK No. 2019052), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41961017, 41661001), Key Research & Development and Transformation Plan of Qinghai Province (No. 2019-HZ-814), State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resources Ecology (No. 2020-KF-06)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, W., Zhang, D., Tian, L. et al. Aeolian Activities and Protective Effects of Artificial Plants in Re-vegetated Sandy Land of Qinghai Lake, China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 30, 1129–1142 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-020-1168-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-020-1168-2