Abstract
Purpose
Sexuality, a substantial factor in quality of life, may be altered after breast cancer (BC) treatments as they intimately afflict femininity. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women with a history of BC and to compare it with women without a BC history.
Methods
The French general epidemiological cohort CONSTANCES includes more than 200,000 adults. All inclusion questionnaires from CONSTANCES non-virgin adult female participants were analyzed. Women reporting a history of BC were compared to controls in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed to highlight any demographic risk factor for sexual dysfunction.
Results
Among the 2,680 participants who had a history of BC, 34% did not engage in sexual intercourse (SI) in the month preceding the completion of the questionnaire (n = 911), 34% had pain during SI (n = 901) and 30% were not satisfied with their sex life (n = 803). Sexual dysfunction was significantly more frequent in women who had a history of BC: they had less sexual interest (OR 1.79 [1.65;1.94], p < 0.001), experienced more pain during SI (OR 1.10 [1.02;1.19], p < 0.001) and were more dissatisfied with their sex life (OR 1.58 [1.47;1.71], p < 0.001). This stayed true after adjustment on multiple demographic factors such as age, menopausal status, body mass index and depression.
Conclusions
Overall, in this real-life study in a large national cohort, history of BC appeared to be a risk factor for sexual disorders.
Implications for cancer survivors
Efforts to detect sexual disorders in BC survivors and offer quality support must be pursued.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
With more than 2.3 million new cases worldwide each year, it is now considered that one in eight women will be affected by BC in her lifetime [1,2,3]. Treatment generally consists of surgery, radiation therapy and/or systemic therapy (endocrine therapy, chemotherapy and in some cases targeted biologic therapy) [1]. Supportive care is of important significance to help patients deal with potential expected changes due to cancer and its treatments. One of the major [4,5,6] but less addressed [7,8,9,10] impact is on their sexuality, although survivors see it as a priority [11].
Prevalence of sexual dysfunction, defined as persistent problems with sexual response or pleasure that cause clinically significant distress [12], is difficult to evaluate because of the imprecision of its current diagnostic system [13, 14], a lack of concern and knowledge from clinicians [15,16,17] and crucial socio-cultural disparities [18,19,20,21]. In the literature, the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in cancer-free women fluctuates between 20 and 40% [22,23,24] compared to 40 to 70% for women with a history of BC [7, 25,26,27,28,29,30]. In one study, after BC treatments, women had four to six times higher odds of presenting a sexual disorder compared to women who did not have cancer [31]. The largest French survivors’ quality of life VICAN study [32, 33] included 1,955 sexually active male and female survivors from all cancer sites [30]. Among the 750 women treated for BC, 28%, 42% and 14% reported a respectively weak, moderate or strong deterioration in their sexual health [32]. However, all previous studies took place in the cancer setting with limited retrospect from the diagnosis and leaves open the question of a long-term impact of BC on sexuality. Moreover, these studies involved limited sample size on BC as compared to what allows a large generalist cohort like CONSTANCES [34], which might reflect the daily reality of BC survivors with more hindsight.
The main objective of this study was to describe the sexual function of women who had a history of BC using the large-scale national CONSTANCES cohort. The secondary objective was to evaluate the impact of BC on sexuality by comparing to an unexposed population.
Methods
Population and design
This study used data available at inclusion from the CONSTANCES cohort. The CONSTANCES cohort is a large-scale national generalist prospective cohort intended to contribute to the development of epidemiological research [34, 35]. It was designed as a representative sample of the population covered by the National Health Insurance Fund, and included 220 000 volunteers aged between 18 and 69 at inclusion. The volunteers benefit from a health examination in one of the 22 selected Social Security Health Examination Centers on entry and then every 4 years, and answer an annual questionnaire. All female CONSTANCES participants aged 18 to 75 and reporting a history of sexual intercourse (SI) were analyzed.
Data
The CONSTANCES questionnaires content were previously published [34] and included data on socio-demographics, lifestyle, medical history, gynecological, reproductive and sexual health. All data for this study came from the participants self-administered questionnaires and from the medical questionnaire filled by the doctor during the initial medical exam, at time of inclusion in the CONSTANCES cohort.
Exposure and outcome definition
The exposed population involved participants whose medical questionnaire (completed by a doctor) mentioned a history of BC. The unexposed population was defined as participants who did not have a history of BC.
Sexual function was defined using three binary variables reported in a self-questionnaire at inclusion: lack of sexual interest (absence of SI within the month of the questionnaire being submitted) (binary variable), pain during SI and sexual dissatisfaction (both categorical variables binarized). Lack of sexual interest describes if the participant reported the absence of SI in the month before filling the questionnaire. Pain during SI is assessed from a four-item answer ("never or exceptionally", “sometimes”, “often” and “always”) and is considered absent if the participant answers “never or exceptionally” and present otherwise. Sexual dissatisfaction is assessed from a four-item answer (“not at all satisfactory”, “not very satisfactory”, “satisfactory” and “very satisfactory”). Dissatisfaction was considered present if the answer was “not at all satisfactory” or “not very satisfactory” and absent otherwise.
Regarding covariates, age is calculated as the subtraction of the date the questionnaire was completed minus the date of birth. Menopausal and smoking status were assessed from three-item answers (respectively “yes”, “no”, “do not know” and “yes, actual smoker”, “yes, past smoker”, “no, never smoked”, the latter was considered present if the answer were yes, actual and past). Depression and diabetes (types 1 and 2) were considered present if checked in the medical questionnaire filled during the initial medical examination. Body mass index (BMI) was measured in kg/m2 during the initial medical examination.
Statistical analysis
Analyzes were performed using R version 4.1.1. All statistical tests were two-sided and carried out at the α risk of 5%.
Descriptive analysis
A descriptive analysis was carried out for the overall population and the exposed (BC) and non-exposed groups. This description covered socio-demographic data, medical history (including body mass index, depression, oncology, gynecology and obstetrics) and lifestyle (physical activity, smoking status and perceived state of health). The qualitative or binary variables were characterized by their counts and percentages. The quantitative variables were described by an estimation of their median and quartiles. A graphical representation for certain variables is provided in the appendix (histograms for quantitative variables, and bar charts for qualitative variables).
Missing data
In all questionnaires, the modality “Do not wish to answer” was considered a missing data for carrying out statistical tests (not for descriptive analysis). Multivariate imputation by chained equations was performed using the MICE function in R.
Univariate analysis
Socio-demographic variables were compared between exposure groups using Chi-square test, Fisher test or Student t-test. Univariate association between exposure and outcome was assessed with logistic regression and odd-ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (95%CI) and p-value (p) were reported.
Multivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis by multiple logistic regression was performed. Variables included in the model were selected based on their clinical significance in the previous literature and on statistical significance in the univariate analysis.
Ethics
This study was reviewed and approved by our local ethical committee (DATA220042). CONSTANCES was approved by French national committees regarding ethics and data protection. No opinion from the Committee for the Protection of Persons (CPP) was required for this study according to French regulations.
Results
Socio-cultural demographics
After selection on sex and history of SI in their life, 101,629 participants were included. Median age was 46.0 years [36.0; 57.5]. The participants had mostly reached university level (n = 64,138; 63,1%) and occupied an intermediate profession (n = 62,093; 61.1%). Most participants were in a couple (n = 58,286; 57.4%) (see Supplementary Table A). Two-thousand six-hundred eighty had a history of BC (2.6%) (data available for 101,407 participants). The median of time between the reported age at BC diagnosis and inclusion in the study was 7.5 years [4.0; 13.5]. Socio-demographics of participants with a history of BC are illustrated in Fig. 1.
Sexual function and consequence in the BC population
Among participants who had a history of BC, 34.0% did not engage in SI in the month preceding the completion of the questionnaire (n = 911), 33.6% experienced pain during SI (n = 901) and 30.0% did not find their sex life satisfactory (n = 803) (see Table 1).
As a result of pain during SI, 8.8% of participants affected by BC had to interrupt or even avoid SI (n = 237) (see Fig. 2). Satisfaction with couple life was high (satisfied n = 963, 35.9%; very satisfied 620, 23.1%) (see Table 1).
Difference of sexual function between BC and non-BC populations
In univariate analysis, participants with a history of BC were significantly less likely to have had sex in the last month (OR 1.79 [1.65;1.94], p < 0.001). They were more likely to report pain during SI (OR 1.10 [1.02;1.19], p < 0.001). Finally, they were significantly less satisfied with their sex life (OR 1.58 [1.47;1.71], p < 0.001) (see Table 2).
In multivariate analysis, when adjusted on age, BC remained an independent risk factor for lack of sexual interest (OR 1.11 [1.02;1.20], p = 0.013), pain during SI (OR 1.38 [1.28;1.50], p < 0.001) and sexual dissatisfaction (OR 1.24 [1.15;1.34], p < 0.001) (see Table 2). BC was an independent risk factor for the 3 variables after adjustment on BMI, menopausal and smoking status, history of depression and diabetes (see Table 2).
Discussion
This study, which focused on the sexuality of 2,680 women after BC, showed that 1 in 3 does not have a regular sexual activity, experiences dyspareunia and is dissatisfied with her sex life. The prevalence of these disorders was significantly higher than in women without a history of BC.
The population of the CONSTANCES cohort, whose recruitment is done from the National Social Security System, has the advantage of being real-life data, as opposed to a hospital or cancer-center based cohort, which might select for affective biases (distortion of judgment driven by the influence of affective states in relation to the temporal and geographical proximity of cancer treatment memories). However, it has the limitation of selecting a population of high socio-professional category, more inclined to participate in a study on questionnaires with annual follow-up, and in better health. It is representative of the prevalence of BC in French women. Indeed, in 2017 the National Cancer Institute estimates a prevalence of 913,089 cases of BC [36] for 34,48 million women identified in France the same year [37, 38], i.e. 2.6% (in this study there were 2,680 BC cases, i.e. 2.7% of the female cohort). The history of BC was reported by the patients (n = 2,909) and validated by a medical questionnaire completed by a doctor (n = 3,002) as part of the study. These data do not coincide perfectly. We made the choice to select the participants for whom the history had been retained by the doctor. Furthermore, the only information on BC available in the CONSTANCES data is the age at diagnosis, which calls on the patient's memory and exposes to understanding and memory bias. Based on this data, median of time between the diagnosis and inclusion in the study is 7.5 years [4.0; 13.5], which is longer than previous studies.
The study of sexuality remains a taboo subject to this day [39, 40] and leads to a high number of non-responses [41, 42]. It is particularly true in the BC survivors’ group (see Table 1) and can be related to psychological factors such as depressive symptoms, body image alteration and femininity violation caused by BC treatments which may add to the discomfort of addressing such an intimate topic. Our imputation strategy made it possible to overcome this limitation on the assumption that the data missing is only associated with observed variables (e.g. socio-demographic), however more complex mechanisms (e.g. the probability of missing also depends on the unknown value of the variable) are possible. Furthermore, specific analysis on non-respondents to identify potential patterns are currently ongoing.
This study was not carried out on validated sexuality questionnaires such as the Female Sexual Function Index [43], and the choice was made to retain the three variables of interest "SI in the last month" to represent frequency, "pain during sex" and "satisfaction with sex life". These three variables seemed to be both easily exploitable and to represent sexual function as broadly and faithfully as possible based on the data available in CONSTANCES. However, they have their limits as they are automatically boosted in coupled-up participants who will more likely report more frequent and satisfying SI.
In conclusion, our study, which to our knowledge for the first time compared the sexual life of women with a history of BC to women without BC in real life, has shown an impairment of the sexual life of women receiving BC treatments, independently of age.
Data availability
Access to sensitive and personal data, such as those of the CONSTANCES cohort, is restricted by French law. The CONSTANCES coordination team makes the data available, upon request, to qualified researchers who have obtained prior authorization from the French national data protection authority (Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés, CNIL). Information for applicants to CONSTANCES data is available on the website: https://www.constances.fr/CFP.pdf. CONSTANCES investigators may be contacted at the following address: contact@constances.fr.
References
How Common Is Breast Cancer? | Breast Cancer Statistics [Internet]. [cited 2021 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/about/how-common-is-breast-cancer.html.
Cancer today [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jun 27]. Available from: http://gco.iarc.fr/today/home.
Arnold M, Morgan E, Rumgay H, Mafra A, Singh D, Laversanne M, et al. Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040. Breast Elsevier. 2022;66:15–23.
World Health Organisation. Defining sexual health [Internet]. [cited 2022 Feb 15]. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/control-of-neglected-tropical-diseases/lymphatic-filariasis/morbidity-management-and-disability-prevention/sexual-and-reproductive-health-and-research.
Flynn KE, Lin L, Bruner DW, Cyranowski JM, Hahn EA, Jeffery DD, et al. Sexual Satisfaction and the Importance of Sexual Health to Quality of Life Throughout the Life Course of U.S. Adults. J Sex Med. 2016;13:1642–50.
Salakari M, Nurminen R, Sillanmäki L, Pylkkänen L, Suominen S. The importance of and satisfaction with sex life among breast cancer survivors in comparison with healthy female controls and women with mental depression or arterial hypertension: results from the Finnish nationwide HeSSup cohort study. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28:3847–54.
Den Ouden MEM, Pelgrum-Keurhorst MN, Uitdehaag MJ, De Vocht HM. Intimacy and sexuality in women with breast cancer: professional guidance needed. Breast Cancer. 2019;26:326–32.
Préservation de la santé sexuelle et cancer - synthèse - Ref : RRLABELSEXKSYNT21 [Internet]. [cited 2022 Feb 15]. Available from: https://www.e-cancer.fr/Expertises-et-publications/Catalogue-des-publications/Preservation-de-la-sante-sexuelle-et-cancer-synthese.
Mokhtari-Hessari P, Montazeri A. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: review of reviews from 2008 to 2018. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18:338.
Mangiardi-Veltin M, Sebbag C, Rousset-Jablonski C, Ray-Coquard I, Berkach C, Laot L, et al. Pregnancy, fertility concerns and fertility preservation procedures in a national study of French breast cancer survivors. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2022;44:1031–44.
Assogba ELF, Kamga AM, Costaz H, Jankowski C, Dumas A, Roignot P, et al. What are young women living conditions after breast cancer? Health-related quality of life, sexual and fertility issues, Professional reinsertion. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:1564.
Shepardson RL, Carey MP. Sexual Dysfunctions. In: Friedman HS, editor. Encyclopedia of Mental Health (Second Edition) [Internet]. Oxford: Academic Press; 2016 [cited 2023 Feb 27]. p. 140–3. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123970459000148.
Latif EZ, Diamond MP. Arriving at the diagnosis of female sexual dysfunction. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:898–904.
Mangiardi-Veltin M, Hequet D, Segura-Djezzar C, Rouzier R, Bonneau C. Sexuality after breast cancer, how to provide a global and contemporary approach. Bull Cancer. 2022;S0007–4551(22):00396–404.
Bhugra D, Colombini G. Sexual dysfunction: classification and assessment. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2013;19:48–55.
O’Connor SR, Connaghan J, Maguire R, Kotronoulas G, Flannagan C, Jain S, et al. Healthcare professional perceived barriers and facilitators to discussing sexual wellbeing with patients after diagnosis of chronic illness: A mixed-methods evidence synthesis. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102:850–63.
Dai Y, Cook OY, Yeganeh L, Huang C, Ding J, Johnson CE. Patient-Reported Barriers and Facilitators to Seeking and Accessing Support in Gynecologic and Breast Cancer Survivors With Sexual Problems: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies. J Sex Med. 2020;17:1326–58.
Pérez-López FR, Ornat L, López-Baena MT, Pérez-Roncero GR, Tajada-Duaso MC, Chedrau P. Association of female genital mutilation and female sexual dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;254:236–44.
Pérez-López FR, Ornat L, Pérez-Roncero GR, López-Baena MT, Sánchez-Prieto M, Chedraui P. The effect of endometriosis on sexual function as assessed with the Female Sexual Function Index: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020;36:1015–23.
Rosenthal L, Lobel M. Gendered racism and the sexual and reproductive health of Black and Latina Women. Ethn Health. 2020;25:367–92.
Posada Correa AM, Andrade Carrillo RA, Suarez Vega DC, Gómez Cano S, Agudelo Arango LG, Tabares Builes LF, et al. Sexual and Reproductive Health in Patients with Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed). 2020;49:15–22.
Shifren JL, Monz BU, Russo PA, Segreti A, Johannes CB. Sexual problems and distress in United States women: prevalence and correlates. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:970–8.
Prairie BA, Wisniewski SR, Luther J, Hess R, Thurston RC, Wisner KL, et al. Symptoms of depressed mood, disturbed sleep, and sexual problems in midlife women: cross-sectional data from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015;24:119–26.
Mindel A, Marks C, Tideman R, Taylor J, Seifert C, Berry G, et al. Sexual behaviour and social class in Australian women. Int J STD AIDS. 2003;14:344–9.
Mitchell KR, Jones KG, Wellings K, Johnson AM, Graham CA, Datta J, et al. Estimating the Prevalence of Sexual Function Problems: The Impact of Morbidity Criteria. J Sex Res. Taylor & Francis. 2016;53:955–67.
Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA. 1999;281:537–44.
Heiman JR. Sexual dysfunction: Overview of prevalence, etiological factors, and treatments. J Sex Res. Taylor & Francis. 2002;39:73–8.
Lewis RW, Fugl-Meyer KS, Bosch R, Fugl-Meyer AR, Laumann EO, Lizza E, et al. Epidemiology/risk factors of sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2004;1:35–9.
Carreira H, Williams R, Dempsey H, Stanway S, Smeeth L, Bhaskaran K. Quality of life and mental health in breast cancer survivors compared with non-cancer controls: a study of patient-reported outcomes in the United Kingdom. J Cancer Surviv. 2021;15:564–75.
Ben Charif A, Bouhnik A-D, Courbière B, Rey D, Préau M, Bendiane M-K, et al. Sexual health problems in French cancer survivors 2 years after diagnosis—the national VICAN survey. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10:600–9.
Safarinejad MR, Shafiei N, Safarinejad S. Quality of life and sexual functioning in young women with early-stage breast cancer 1 year after lumpectomy. Psychooncology. 2013;22:1242–8.
La vie deux ans après un diagnostic de cancer - De l’annonce à l’après-cancer - Ref : ETUDVICAN14 [Internet]. [cited 2020 May 26]. Available from: https://www.e-cancer.fr/Expertises-et-publications/Catalogue-des-publications/La-vie-deux-ans-apres-un-diagnostic-de-cancer-De-l-annonce-a-l-apres-cancer.
L’enquête VICAN5 - La vie cinq ans après un diagnostic de cancer [Internet]. [cited 2021 Feb 19]. Available from: https://www.e-cancer.fr/Expertises-et-publications/Le-point-sur/La-vie-cinq-ans-apres-un-diagnostic-de-cancer/L-enquete-VICAN5.
Goldberg M, Carton M, Descatha A, Leclerc A, Roquelaure Y, Santin G, et al. CONSTANCES: a general prospective population-based cohort for occupational and environmental epidemiology: cohort profile. Occup Environ Med. 2017;74:66–71.
Zins M, Goldberg M, CONSTANCES team. The French CONSTANCES population-based cohort: design, inclusion and follow-up. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30:1317–28.
Le cancer du sein - Les cancers les plus fréquents [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jul 13]. Available from: https://www.e-cancer.fr/Professionnels-de-sante/Les-chiffres-du-cancer-en-France/Epidemiologie-des-cancers/Les-cancers-les-plus-frequents/Cancer-du-sein.
Estimation de la population au 1er janvier 2018 | Insee [Internet]. [cited 2018 Jul 22]. Available from: https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/1893198.
Population féminine française 2023 [Internet]. Statista. [cited 2023 Mar 6]. Available from: https://fr.statista.com/statistiques/472123/nombre-femme-population-france/.
Cairo Notari S, Fornage S, Panes-Ruedin B. Zaman K [Sexuality after breast cancer is not a taboo]. Rev Med Suisse. 2018;14:563–5.
Traumer L, Jacobsen MH, Laursen BS. Patients’ experiences of sexuality as a taboo subject in the Danish healthcare system: a qualitative interview study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2019;33:57–66.
Bond JC, Abrams J, Wesselink AK, White KO, Rothman KJ, Wise LA. Predictors of Non-Response to a Sexual Health Survey in a North American Preconception Cohort Study. J Sex Med. 2022;19:1707–15.
Cheung YB, Daniel R, Ng GY. Response and non-response to a quality-of-life question on sexual life: a case study of the simple mean imputation method. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:1493–501.
Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther. 2005;31:1–20.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank "Population-based Epidemiologic Cohorts Unit”, UMS 011, Université de Paris, INSERM, Paris Saclay University, UVSQ, who designed and is in charge of the CONSTANCES Project. They also thank the “Caisse nationale de l’assurance maladie” (CNAM) and the “Centres d’examens de santé” of the French Social Security which are collecting a large part of the data, as well as the “Caisse nationale d’assurance vieillesse”, ClinSearch, Asqualab and Eurocell in charge of the data quality control.
Access to some confidential data, on which this work is based, was made possible within a secure environment provided by the Centre d’accès sécurisé aux données (CASD) (Ref. https://doi.org/10.34724/CASD).
Funding
The CONSTANCES Project benefits from a grant from ANR (ANR-11-INBS-0002). CONSTANCES is also partly funded by MSD, AstraZeneca, Lundbeck and L’Oréal. None of these funding sources had any role in the design of the study, collection and analysis of data or decision to publish.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by M.C-P, M.G and M.Z. Analysis was performed by M.M-V and C.B. The first draft of the manuscript was written by M.M-V and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Authors have nothing to declare.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration, as revised in 2008. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the French Institute of Health Research (INSERM). The CONSTANCES cohort was also approved by the French Data Protection Agency (CNIL). All participants provided written informed consent.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
We have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Highlights
• 1 in 3 breast cancer female survivor does not have regular sexual intercourse.
• 1 in 3 breast cancer female survivor experiences pain during sexual intercourse.
• 1 in 3 breast cancer female survivor is not satisfied with her sexual life.
• Sexual dysfunction is more frequent in breast cancer female survivors than in controls.
• This stays true independently of age and menopause status.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mangiardi-Veltin, M., Mullaert, J., Coeuret-Pellicer, M. et al. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction after breast cancer compared to controls, a study from CONSTANCES cohort. J Cancer Surviv (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-023-01407-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-023-01407-z