Abstract
The Brazilian coastal zone comprises several types of environments, including lagoons and beaches, chosen for this study, which evaluate benthic meiofauna spatial distribution patterns in three areas, suffering different disturbance levels, throughout the Brazilian Amazon coast. Sediments from three areas (São Marcos Beach – Low level of disturbance; Calhau Beach – Medium level of disturbance; and Jansen Lagoon – High level of disturbance), in São Luís city (Maranhão, Brazil), were sampled for meiofauna assessments, granulometry and organic matter analyses. A total of 7,254 meiofaunal organisms were identified, 4,371 at São Marcos Beach, 1,856 at Jansen Lagoon, and 1,027 at Calhau Beach. The findings indicate that richness, density, and community structures differed significantly among the sampled areas. Nematoda and Copepoda were the most abundant groups. Copepoda stood out in São Marcos Beach compared to other taxa. Nematoda dominated in Jansen Lagoon. Calhau Beach presented the lowest density and richness values, with Tardigrada as the predominant meiofaunal group. Additionally, the composition of meiofauna was influenced by environmental variables, such as salinity, OM, sediment grain size and nitrate concentration, as well as anthropogenic activities taking place in the sampled areas. Considering the lack of studies in the region with this focus, it is expected that the results presented will contribute to public policies development aimed to conservation of the coastal zone in São Luís.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The coastal zone is a complex and ever-changing environment, due to natural processes on wide time scales and increasing human activities (Danovaro and Pusceddu 2007; Defeo et al. 2009; Zho et al. 2018). Lately, there has been growing concern about the environmental impacts in this region (Paoli et al. 2015) as well as the search for solutions to reduce the effects of anthropogenic actions (Pilouk and Koottatep 2017). However, socioeconomic pressures in coastal areas accelerate unplanned urbanization and natural resource degradation, threatening environmental and economic sustainability (Schlacher et al. 2006, 2007; Ariza et al. 2010; McLachlan and Defeo 2017; Bertocci et al. 2019).
In this context, monitoring studies in coastal regions have aided the management of these areas (Ariza et al. 2010; Schlacher and Thompson 2012; Sun et al. 2014; Semprucci et al. 2015a, b; Peña-Alonso et al. 2017), through the use of ecological indicators, such as abundance, density, richness and diversity descriptors, employed to evaluate the status quo of coastal environments and plan public policies (Balsamo et al. 2012; Alves et al. 2013). Regularly, the structure of benthic communities is used in environmental studies in order to use the composition of the community as a parameter for environmental quality classification (Weisberg et al. 2008; Ranasinghe et al. 2009).
Because they live in the interstitium, benthic meiofauna have been used as marine ecosystems quality bioindicators and are routinely analyzed in environmental stress assessments (Gheskiere et al. 2005; Moreno et al. 2008, 2011; Alves et al. 2013; Zeppilli et al. 2015). Furthermore, due to their short life cycles, the responses of these organisms to the consequences generated by polluting agents are faster, as benthic meiofauna density and diversity are lower in affected environments, with the most sensitive species disappearing and only the most tolerant resisting (Giere 2009; Moreno et al. 2011; Balsamo et al. 2012; Mirto et al. 2012; Alves et al. 2013; Sun et al. 2014; Semprucci et al. 2015b; Zeppilli et al. 2015a; Bertocci et al. 2019).
The coastal zone of Maranhão, in Brazil, presents a mosaic of high environmental relevance ecosystems (Gama et al. 2011). However, the advancing local urban occupation has imposed strong pressures on this area (da Silva et al. 2013; Rêgo et al. 2018; Machado and Rodrigues 2020). Many areas of the state, including the northern coastal region of São Luís city presents significant human population densities, resulting in different needs and interests, and presenting economic and natural potentialities that have been extensively explored, ignoring local environmental laws (Serra and Farias Filho 2019).
With regard to São Luís coastal region, this area has suffered significant environmental degradation due to effluent discharges, solid waste inputs, the removal of coastal dunes, urban constructions in and around the beaches, beach vegetation suppression, real estate speculation, and tourism (Rêgo et al. 2018; Rodrigues et al. 2020; Santos et al. 2021; Guayanaz et al. 2022). And despite all that, coastal management initiatives are practically non-existent (da Silva et al. 2013).
Given this scenario, the present study aimed to evaluate meiofauna spatial distribution patterns between three areas suffering different disturbance levels throughout the Brazilian Amazon coast. A perturbation gradient was postulated in the studied environments and hypothesized that meiofaunal diversity and density decreases as the postulated perturbation gradient increases.
Materials and methods
Study areas
Samples were collected in São Luís city (Maranhão, Brazil), at Calhau (02º28’49.03”S; 44º14’25.79”W) and São Marcos (02º29’11.00”S; 44º18’07.20”W) beaches and Jansen Lagoon (02°29’07’’S; 44°18’02’’W) (Fig. 1). This municipality is one of the four that belong to Maranhão Island, which is inserted in the center of Maranhense Gulf, separating São José Bay to the east and São Marcos Bay to the west (Fernandes et al. 2022). This area is characterized by a macrotidal regime (tidal range up to 6.5 m), with strong currents (up to 1.2 m s− 1) and moderate wave heights (Hb) up to 1.1 m, with a period of 3 to 8 s (da Silva et al. 2013; Masullo 2016).
The urban development of São Luís northern coastal area is characterized by building constructions on the dune systems that run parallel to the coastline and cliffs (da Silva et al. 2013). These buildings were constructed without permits or environmental agency controls. Until the 1960s, the coastal zone of São Luís was sparsely inhabited, but from the beginning of the 1970s, the city underwent a rapid and unregulated territorial expansion, resulting in several impacts (Espírito Santo 2006).
Disturbance level classification
The choice of sampling areas and disturbance level classification considered the bathing quality reports issued by the State Secretary for Environment and Natural Resources of Maranhão (Secretaria de Estado de Meio Ambiente e Recursos Naturais do Maranhão - SEMA) from January 2017 to July 2021. These reports were used to identify areas with the highest and lowest incidence of bathing notices. Additionally, other criteria were considered in the selection, as previous studies conducted in the same area and observations, concerning the following parameters, during the sampling campaigns: urbanization/coastal development intensity, domestic effluent discharge, the presence of domestic animals and vehicles, and the intensity of tourism (Adapted from Pereira et al. 2017) (Table 1).
Samplings procedure
Sampling was carried out in November 2021 during low tide. A transect perpendicular to the waterline was drawn in all three areas, from which ten equidistant replicas (10 m) of sediment were collected for meiofauna analyses, totaling 30 samples, using a cylindrical corer with an internal diameter of 2.4 cm to the depth of 20 cm of sediment. Sediment replicas were also collected from each area for particle size and organic matter content analysis. The meiofauna samples were fixed in a 4% formaldehyde solution, still in the field, and physicochemical water variables (pH, salinity, dissolved oxygen, ammonium, and nitrate) were determined in loco with the aid of a multiparameter HI9829 HANNA probe.
Laboratory procedures
Meiofauna extraction and identification
The samples were elutriated manually into a 100 mL beaker and poured onto overlapping sieves presenting 0.5 mm and 0.045 mm of apertures. This procedure was repeated three times for each sample to maximize organism extraction. The material retained on the 0.045 mm sieve was washed with the aid of a beaker and transferred to a Dollfus plate. The meiofauna was then counted and identified to the level of the main taxonomic groups according to Giere (2009) under a stereomicroscope and microscope, and their density was standardized to individuals per 10 cm− 2. All extracted organisms were placed in Eppendorfs containing 70% alcohol.
Sediment analysis
The granulometric analysis was performed according to Suguio (1973). The samples were dried in an oven at 60º C and characterized in particle size, combining the wet sieving technique (sieve > 62 μm) and pipetting. The processing was determined according to the Wentworth scale (1922), with nominal sample classifications carried out according to Folk and Ward (1957). Organic matter content was determined following the muffle ignition of 50 g of dry sediment stored in porcelain crucibles and muffled for 12 h at 45 ºC (Walkley and Black 1934). After being removed from the muffle, the sediment was weighed again and the difference in weight meant the amount of organic matter (OM) of each sample volatilized during the ignition process.
Numerical and statistical analyses
The Shapiro-Wilk test (Shapiro and Wilk 1965) and Levene’s test (Levene 1960) were used to verify data normality and homogeneity, transformed in log (x + 1). To analyze community structure, density (N), expressed as number of individuals per 10 cm− 2, and richness, expressed as number of taxa (S), were calculated. An Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) One-Way was used to verify significant variations in ecological descriptors between sampled areas. Significant variations were compared using Tukey’s a posteriori test.
Community structure was compared between studied areas using Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA) with 9999 permutations, based on a Bray-Curtis similarity matrix (Anderson 2014). An nMDS graph was constructed to visualize associations between groups. Relationships between taxa abundance and water and sediment environmental variables were analyzed through a Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) (ter Braak 1986). The Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) was tested to reduce collinearity between variables, but none had to be removed. Finally, CCA significance was tested by an ANOVA test. A significance level of 0.05 was established for all analyses. All multivariate analyses were performed using log (x + 1) transformed data to adjust for the contribution of dominant and rare species (Clarke 1993).
All analyses were performed using the R software (R Core Team 2022) packages car (Fox and Weisberg 2019), ggplot2 (Wickham 2016), lattice (Sarkar 2008), permute (Simpson 2022), and vegan (Oksanen et al. 2022).
Results
Environmental variables
The average salinity was \(\stackrel{-}{X }\)= 14.35 (± 10.58) among the three study areas, with the lowest and highest values registered at Calhau Beach (2.16) and São Marcos Beach (21.2), respectively. Dissolved oxygen (DO) values ranged from 27.40% at the lagoon to 31.70% at São Marcos Beach (\(\stackrel{-}{X }\)= 29.7 ± 2.16). As for pH, values of 6.32, 6.82 and 7.49 were observed for São Marcos Beach, Calhau Beach and Jansen Lagoon, respectively (\(\stackrel{-}{X }\)= 6.87 ± 0.58) (Fig. 2).
Regarding ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3−), and organic matter (OM) concentrations, the average values for the study areas were 60.13 (± 9.35), 8.8 (± 2.48), 14.6 (± 13.27), respectively, with Jansen Lagoon presenting the highest absolute values for each variable (NH4+ = 170.2 µmol L− 1; NO3− = 23.22 µmol L− 1; OM = 30 g dm− 3) (Fig. 2).
Granulometry
The sediment in the three study areas was characterized as fine, well sorted or very well sorted sand, corresponding to 97%, 84% and 52% of total sediment at São Marcos and Calhau beaches and Jansen Lagoon, respectively. The second most abundant fraction was coarse sand. Silt and clay fractions were detected only at Jansen Lagoon (Fig. 3).
Meiofauna community
A total of 7,254 meiofaunal organisms were identified, distributed in 10 taxa in the three study areas, 4,371 at São Marcos Beach, 1,856 at Jansen Lagoon and 1,027 at Calhau Beach. The richness detected at São Marcos Beach (10) and Jansen Lagoon (8) were similar, although the faunal composition varied between them, while Calhau Beach presented the lowest value (5) for this descriptor (Table 2).
The total density of individuals was 301.7 ind.10 cm− 2, ranging from 125.04 ind.10 cm− 2 (Copepoda) to 0.04 ind.10 cm− 2 (Kinorhyncha). Copepod was the taxon with the highest density, at São Marcos Beach (125.04 ind.10 cm2), meanwhile at Jansen Lagoon, the highest density taxon was Nematoda (73.08 ind.10 cm− 2) and at Calhau Beach, Tardigrada (23.83 ind.10 cm− 2) (Table 2).
Copepoda was the most abundant group (41.85%), followed by Nematoda (39.21%), representing 81% of all identified organisms. Copepoda Harpacticoida were noteworthy among the other identified taxa at São Marcos Beach, accounting 69% of the relative organismal abundance. Jansen Lagoon was almost totally dominated by Nematoda, which contributed with 95% of the relative abundance in this area. At Calhau Beach, the predominant meiofaunal group was Tardigrada, which made up 56% of the relative organismal abundance (Fig. 4).
The ANOVA results indicate that density and taxa richness differed significantly among the study areas. The PERMANOVA result indicated a dissimilarity in meiofaunal community structure (Table 3). Paired comparisons indicated that density was significantly higher at São Marcos Beach compared to Calhau Beach and Jansen Lagoon, with no significant difference detected between the last two. Richness was significantly lower at Jansen Lagoon compared to São Marcos and Calhau beaches (Fig. 5).
The nMDS analysis demonstrated a clear separation between studied areas in terms of community structure, forming three distinct groups, corroborating PERMANOVA results (Fig. 6).
The CCA was significant (p = 0.03) and indicated that 90% of explained data variance associated species density and environmental variables (Axis I: 55.64%; Axis II: 34.36%). Nematoda, Oligochaeta and Bivalvia were positively influenced by OM, pH, NO3−, NH4+ and fine sand at Jansen Lagoon. At São Marcos beach, Copepoda, Polychaeta, Nemertea, Kinorhyncha and Turbellaria were positively influenced by DO, while Tardigrada were negatively influenced by salinity, at Calhau Beach (Fig. 7).
Discussion
Although meiofaunal communities varied among areas suffering different disturbance degrees, forming three distinct groups according to the nMDS analysis, meiofaunal diversity and density did not decrease according to the postulated disturbance gradient. It was expected that Jansen Lagoon would present the lowest values for the analyzed descriptors, which was, instead, observed for Calhau Beach. São Marcos Beach presented the expected pattern for a less impacted environment, displaying the highest density and richness values. Despite the results, we assume that the richness in the present study is being underestimated due to the low taxonomic resolution used.
Jansen Lagoon exhibited a high density of Nematoda, which tend to increase in contaminated environments (Bouwman et al. 1984; Ferraz et al. 2022), as in this lagoon’s case, which receives large loads of surface runoff and pollutants. The overlap of this taxa is explained by its high resistance to osmotic stress (Forster 1998; di Montanara et al. 2022; Jonathan 2022) and ability to use enriched sediment organic content as a potential food source (Bongers and Ferris 1999; Losi et al. 2021; Jonathan 2022; Xu et al. 2022). Furthermore, these worms exhibit a strong relationship with fine sediments (Vanaverbeke et al. 2002; Semprucci et al. 2010, 2015a; Baia and Venekey 2019), such as those found in the lagoon.
Among the three study areas, Jansen Lagoon presented the second highest taxa density and richness, which may be associated to the higher OM in this area compared to others, explaining the correlation between this parameter to this area in the CCA. Meiofauna composition can increase according to sediment OM, and higher OM concentrations are usually associated to higher amounts of organisms (Mouawad et al. 2012). However, although OM from domestic sewage benefits marine meiofauna as a potential food source, negative effects may arise when OM is present in excess, causing anoxic conditions or generating hydrogen sulfide (H2S) when degraded by anaerobic bacteria (de Oliveira and Soares-Gomes 2003).
Despite the concentration of ammonium and nitrate, in three study areas, being within the parameters allowed by Brazilian Environmental Legislation for saline and brackish waters (Brasil 2005), the concentration of these parameters was significantly higher in Jansen Lagoon, when compared to the other areas. Ammonium and nitrate occurs in water as a final product of organic nitrogen biological degradation and is generally used as a poor water quality indicator (Mouawad et al. 2012). Moreover, high concentrations of this nitrogenous compound can lead to an excessive microalgae proliferation, with consequent increases in the amount of chlorophyll-a and intense eutrophication events (Penna et al. 2004; Bertocci et al. 2019). Eutrophication can make sediment hypoxic or anoxic (Penna et al. 2004) and benefit opportunistic species (Rabalais et al. 2001; Vanaverbeke et al. 2004a, b; Carriço et al. 2013; Semprucci et al. 2015a). When not associated with oxygen limitation, eutrophic conditions can increase microbial activity and, eventually, meiofauna abundance and diversity (Giere 2009).
Copepoda also presented high density. The CCA correlated the abundance of this taxon at São Marcos Beach to sediment DO. Copepods are more representative in well-oxygenated environments (Coull 1999; Moreno et al. 2006; De Troch et al. 2013; Hure et al. 2020; Medellín-Mora et al. 2021) and exhibit a relatively larger presence compared to Nematoda at tropical beaches (Giere 2009), as observed at São Marcos Beach.
Copepoda stood out in terms of density and relative abundance at São Marcos Beach. This group is considered more sensitive to environmental disturbances than other meiofaunal groups (Raffaelli and Mason 1981; Hicks and Coull 1983; Van Damme et al. 1984; Raffaelli 1987; Gheskiere et al. 2005; Pereira et al. 2017). The dominance of these organisms at São Marcos Beach may be indicative of good environmental quality of this beach, while its near absence at Jansen Lagoon and Calhau Beach may indicate serious disturbances in both areas.
Tardigrada displayed the highest density at Calhau Beach, which is not common, as its density is rarely very high, even in favorable locations (Giere 2009). This result may be related to the low salinity of the study site (Kinchin 1994), corroborating Tilbert et al. (2019), who reported that the highest density values of this group coincided with the low salinity gradient. It is likely that these animals have a wide distribution in brackish water, probably alternating between metabolic activity and inactivity (osmobiosis), according to salinity concentration variations (Kinchin 1994).
Calhau Beach exhibited the lowest richness among the three studied areas, potentially due to OM excess and low salinity, as benthic species usually occur in high salinity and low variability areas (Barroso and Matthews-Cascon 2009; Hourston et al. 2009; La Valle et al. 2021; Laurino and Turra 2021). These factors, in turn, may be related to the presence of Calhau River tributary and nearby a Sewage Pumping Station (SPW). This SPW contributed to the occurrence of the phenomenon known as “Black Tongue” from 2016 to 2021 (G1 MA 2018, 2019, Estado 2016, 2017, 2020, 2021), involving in natura SPW sewage releases which, due to malfunctioning, resulted in Calhau River pollution and consequent spillover at Calhau Beach (G1 MA, 2018). Based on these results, it is possible to infer that the conditions on this beach are so adverse that only organisms displaying extreme resilience, such as Tardigrada, are able to survive.
Calhau Beach also suffers from sediment compaction by motor vehicles, some belonging to the municipal government, responsible for waste management (in loco observation). Sediment compaction reduces the space between sediment grains and increases resistance to fluid (gas and liquid) displacement, creating a physical barrier that affects air exchanges and hydraulic conductivity between interstices (Schlacher et al. 2008; Giere 2009), affecting benthic fauna severely.
Nematoda and Copepoda are generally considered the most suitable taxa to assess meiofaunal community ecological conditions (Moore and Bett 1989; Cifoni et al. 2021; Cui et al. 2021). However, although other studies have also reported significant meiofauna responses to environmental disturbances when employing higher taxonomic categories (Moreno et al. 2006; Bianchelli et al. 2016a, b; Pereira et al. 2017; Losi et al. 2021), as in the present study, many authors recognize that increased taxonomic resolution is necessary to better understand ecological patterns (Moore and Bett 1989; Balsamo et al. 2012; Zeppilli et al. 2015). Identification at a specific level allows for more accurate assessments regarding community structures and sentinel species ecology assessments, which may be employed to detect anthropogenic impacts (Moreno et al. 2011; Losi et al. 2021; Sahraeian et al. 2020).
Conclusion
Data reported herein indicated decreased density and richness at different patterns than expected, as the most visually polluted area in this study, and considered the most disturbed one, exhibited higher density and richness than the one initially categorized as moderately disturbed. Therefore, the results indicate that Calhau Beach suffers much more significant impact compared to Jansen Lagoon, which exhibited high density of Nematoda, benefited from high OM content. São Marcos Beach showed a high density of Copepoda, indicating a higher environmental quality. In contrast, Calhau Beach presented a high density of Tardigrada, organisms known for their remarkable ability to withstand adverse situations.
Meiofaunal community varied significantly in studied areas and meiofaunal composition was significantly affected by environmental variables such as salinity, OM, sediment grain size and nitrate concentration, corroborating literature data regarding the influence of organic enrichment and sediment contamination on meiobenthic nematodes.
This is the first study to compare spatial meiofauna distribution in areas under marine influence on the Island of Maranhão and suffering environmental disturbances. These findings will contribute to coastal management programs and to the development of public policies aimed at the conservation of São Luís coastal zone, taking into account that this municipality is an important tourist hub in Maranhão state. Future studies are recommended to assess the temporal effects of anthropogenic pressures on the meiofaunal community structure of these areas and increase taxonomic resolution, at least for dominant taxa.
References
Alves AS, Adão H, Ferrero TJ, Marques JC, Costa MJ, Patrício J (2013) Benthic meiofauna as indicator of ecological changes in estuarine ecosystems: the use of nematodes in ecological quality assessment. Ecol Indic 24:462–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.013
Anderson MJ (2014) Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). Wiley Statsref: Statistics Reference Online 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat07841
Ariza E, Jimenez JA, Sarda R, Villares M, Pinto J, Sansbello RMF, Roca E, Llambrich CM, Valdemoro H, Ballester R, Fluvia M (2010) Proposal for an integral quality index for urban and urbanized beaches. Environ Manage 45:998–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9472-8
Baia E, Venekey V (2019) Distribution patterns of meiofauna on a tropical macrotidal sandy beach, with special focus on nematodes (Caixa d’Água, Amazon Coast, Brazil). Braz J Oceanogr 67. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-87592019023006701
Balsamo M, Semprucci F, Frontalini F, Coccioni R (2012) Meiofauna as a tool for marine ecosystem biomonitoring. In: Cruzado A (ed) Marine Ecosystems. IntechOpen, London, pp 77–104. https://doi.org/10.5772/34423
Barroso CX, Matthews-Cascon H (2009) Distribuição espacial e temporal da malacofauna no estuário do rio Ceará, Ceará, Brasil. Pan Am J Aquat Sci 4(1):79–86
Bertocci I et al (2019) Multiple human pressures in coastal habitats: variation of meiofaunal assemblages associated with sewage discharge in a post-industrial area. Sci Total Environ 655:1218–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.121
Bianchelli S, Pusceddu A, Buschi E, Danovaro R (2016a) Trophic status and meiofauna biodiversity in the Northern Adriatic Sea: insights for the assessment of good environmental status. Mar Environ Res 113:18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.10.010
Bianchelli S, Buschi E, Danovaro R, Pusceddu A (2016b) Biodiversity loss and turnover in alternative states in the Mediterranean Sea: a case study on meiofauna. Sci Rep 6(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34544
Bongers T, Ferris H (1999) Nematode community structure as a bioindicator in environmental monitoring. Trends Ecol Evol 14(6):224–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01583-3
Bouwman LA, Romeijn K, Admiraal W (1984) On the ecology of meiofauna in an organically polluted estuarine mudflat. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 19(6):633–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(84)90020-9
Brasil. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Resolução CONAMA Nº 357, de 17 de março de 2005.
Carriço R, Zeppilli D, Quillien N, Grall J (2013) Can meiofauna be a good biological indicator of the impacts of eutrophication caused by green macroalgal blooms? Anaod CM 2:9–16
Cifoni M, Boggero A, Galassi DMP, Di Lorenzo T (2021) An overview of studies on meiofaunal traits of the littoral zone of lakes. Water 13(4):473. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13040473
Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18(1):117–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, c2022. Disponível em: https://www.R-project.org/
Coull BC (1999) Role of meiofauna in estuarine soft-bottom habitats. Aust J Ecol 24(4):327–343. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.1999.00979.x
Cui C, Zhang Z, Hua E (2021) Meiofaunal community spatial distribution and diversity as indicators of ecological quality in the Bohai Sea, China. J Ocean Univ China 20:409–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-021-4550-5
Cutrim MVJ, Ferreira FS, dos Santos AKD, Cavalcanti LF, de Oliveira Araújo B, Azevedo-Cutrim ACG, Oliveira ALL (2019) Trophic state of an urban coastal lagoon (northern Brazil), seasonal variation of the phytoplankton community and environmental variables. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 216:98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2018.08.013
da Silva VC, Nascimento AR, Mourão APC, Neto SVC, Costa FN (2008) Contaminação por Enterococcus da água das praias do município de São Luís, Estado do Maranhão. Acta Sci Technol 30(2):187–192. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v30i2.5492
da Silva IR, Pereira LCC, Guimarães D, de Trindade O, Asp WN, Costa N RMC (2009) Environmental status of urban beaches in São Luís (Amazon coast, Brazil). J Coast Res 56:1301–1305
da Silva IR, Pereira LCC, Trindade WN, Magalhães A, da Costa RM (2013) Natural and anthropogenic processes on the recreational activities in urban Amazon beaches. Ocean Coast Manage 76:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.12.016
Danovaro R, Pusceddu A (2007) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in coastal lagoons: does microbial diversity play any role? Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 75(1–2):4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2007.02.030
de Oliveira EB, Soares-Gomes A (2003) Impact of a point source domestic sewage on intertidal meiofauna at Charitas Beach, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Coast Res 35:573–579
De Troch M, Roelofs M, Riedel B, Grego M (2013) Structural and functional responses of harpacticoid copepods to anoxia in the Northern Adriatic: an experimental approach. Biogeosciences 10(6):4259–4272. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4259-2013
Defeo O et al (2009) Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: a review. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 81(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.09.022
di Montanara AC, Baldrighi E, Franzo A, Catani L, Grassi E, Sandulli R, Semprucci F (2022) Free-living nematodes research: state of the art, prospects, and future directions. A bibliometric analysis approach. Ecol Inf 72:101891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101891
Espírito Santo JM (2006) São Luís: Uma Leitura da Cidade. Instituto de Pesquisa e Planificação da Cidade (IPLAM), São Luís, MA
Estado O (2016) “Língua Negra” permanece desaguando no mar, em SL. Available at: https://oestadoma.com/noticias/2016/11/08/lingua-negra-permanece-desaguando-no-mar-em-sl/. Accessed 23 Jul 2022
Estado O (2017) Língua negra é registrada mais uma vez na orla de São Luís. Available at: https://oestadoma.com/noticias/2017/01/04/lingua-negra-e-registrada-mais-uma-vez-na-orla-de-sao-luis/. Accessed 23 Jul 2022
Estado O (2020) Com língua negra, banho de mar pode não dar sorte no Réveillon. Available at: https://oestadoma.com/noticias/2020/01/01/com-lingua-negra-banho-de-mar-pode-nao-dar-sorte-no-reveillon/. Accessed 23 Jul 2022
O Estado (2021) Língua Negra: fenômeno ocorre com recorrência em alguns pontos de SL. Available at: https://oestadoma.com/noticias/2021/08/17/lingua-negra-fenomeno-ocorre-com-recorrencia-em-alguns-pontos-de-sl/. Accessed 23 Jul 2022
Fernandes JFF, Freitas J, de Araújo SA, de Santana TC, Lobato RS, Figueiredo MB (2022) Reproductive biology of the lane snapper, Lutjanus synagris (Linnaeus 1758) (Perciformes, Lutjanidae), in the Maranhão continental shelf, Northeast of Brazil. Environ Biol Fishes 105(8):1033–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-022-01310-z
Ferraz MA, Kiyama AC, Primel EG, Barbosa SC, Castro ÍB, Choueri RB, Gallucci F (2022) Does pH variation influence the toxicity of organic contaminants in estuarine sediments? Effects of Irgarol on nematode assemblages. Sci Total Environ 815:152944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.152944
Folk RL, Ward WC (1957) Brazos River bar [Texas]; a study in the significance of grain size parameters. J Sediment Res 27(1):3–26. https://doi.org/10.1306/74D70646-2B21-11D7-8648000102C1865D
Forster SJ (1998) Osmotic stress tolerance and osmoregulation of intertidal and subtidal nematodes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 224(1):109–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(97)00192-5
Fox J, Weisberg S (2019) An R Companion to Applied Regression, 3rd. ed. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Available at: https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/. Accessed 14 Jul 2022
G1 MA (2019) Pela terceira vez em 2019, ‘língua negra’ é registrada em praia de São Luís. Available at: https://g1.globo.com/ma/maranhao/noticia/2019/12/23/pela-terceira-vez-em-2019-lingua-negra-e-registrada-em-praia-de-sao-luis.ghtml. Accessed 23 Jul 2022
G1 MA (2018) “Língua Negra” em direção a praia preocupa banhistas no Maranhão. Available at: https://g1.globo.com/ma/maranhao/noticia/lingua-negra-em-direcao-a-praia-preocupa-ambientalistas-no-maranhao.ghtml. Accessed 23 Jul 2022
Gama LR, Sousa MM, Almeida IC, Caridade EO, Ferreira-Correia MM, Terceiro AM (2011) Microfitoplâncton das baías do Golfão Maranhense e litoral oriental do estado do Maranhão. Bol Lab Hidrobiol 24(1):13–26. https://doi.org/10.18764/
Gheskiere T, Vincx M, Urban-Malinga B, Rossano C, Scapini F, Degraer S (2005) Nematodes from wave-dominated sandy beaches: diversity, zonation patterns and testing of the isocommunities concept. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 62(1–2):365–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2004.09.024
Giere O (2009) Meiobenthology: the microscopic motile fauna of aquatic sediments. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68661-3
Guayanaz ACCF, dos Santos TWF, Praseres ECM, Lago ADCR, Santos JDFL (2022) Resíduos sólidos em duas praias urbanas da Ilha de São Luís-MA, Brasil: solid waste in two urban beaches of São Luís Island-MA, Brazil. Stud Environ Anim Sci 3(2):452–460. https://doi.org/10.54020/seasv3n2-023
Hicks GF, Coull BC (1983) The ecology of marine meiobenthic harpacticoid copepods. Oceanogr Mar Biol 21:67–175
Hourston M, Potter IC, Warwick RM, Valesini FJ, Clarke KR (2009) Spatial and seasonal variations in the ecological characteristics of the free-living nematode assemblages in a large microtidal estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 82(2):309–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2009.01.018
Hure M, Batistić M, Kovačević V, Bensi M, Garić R (2020) Copepod community structure in pre-and post-winter conditions in the Southern Adriatic Sea (NE Mediterranean). J Mar Sci Eng 8(8):567. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8080567
Ibañez Rojas MOA, Neto JJGC, Siqueira LFS, Cavalcante PRS (2013) Caracterização físico-química do sedimento da Laguna da Jansen, São Luis, MA. Acta Tecnol 8(2):25–29. https://doi.org/10.35818/acta.v8i2.222
Jonathan EI (2022) Nematology Fundamentals & Applications (2nd revised & Enlarged Edition). New India Publishing Agency
Kinchin IM (1994) The Biology of Tardigrades. Portland Press, London
La Valle FF, Kantar MB, Nelson CE (2021) Coral reef benthic community structure is associated with the spatiotemporal dynamics of submarine groundwater discharge chemistry. Limnol Oceanogr 66(1):188–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11596
Laurino IR, Turra A (2021) The threat of freshwater input on sandy beaches: a small-scale approach to assess macrofaunal changes related to salinity reduction. Mar Environ Res 171:105459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2021.105459
Levene H (1960) Robust tests for the equality of variance. In: Olkin I (ed) Contributions to Probability and Statistics. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, California, pp 278–292
Losi V, Grassi E, Balsamo M, Rocchi M, Gaozza L, Semprucci F (2021) Changes in taxonomic structure and functional traits of nematodes as tools in the assessment of port impact. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 260:107524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2021.107524
Machado AMB, Rodrigues TCS (2020) Comparação de métodos de classificação para o mapeamento da cobertura da terra no setor norte da ilha do Maranhão. Geosciences 39(4):1129–1140. https://doi.org/10.5016/geociencias.v39i04.14128
Masullo YAG (2016) Evolução do processo de urbanização e alterações ambientais na praia de São Marcos, São Luís-MA. Rev Espaço Geogr 19(2):561–595
McLachlan A, Defeo O (2017) The ecology of sandy shores. Academic Press
Medellín-Mora J, Escribano R, Corredor-Acosta A, Hidalgo P, Schneider W (2021) Uncovering the composition and diversity of pelagic copepods in the oligotrophic blue water of the South Pacific subtropical gyre. Front Mar Sci 8:625842. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.625842
Mirto S, Gristina M, Sinopoli M, Maricchiolo G, Genovese L, Vizzini S, Mazzola A (2012) Meiofauna as an indicator for assessing the impact of fish farming at an exposed marine site. Ecol Indic 18:468–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.015
Moore CG, Bett BJ (1989) The use of meiofauna in marine pollution impact assessment. Zool J Linn Soc 96(3):263–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1989.tb02260.x
Moreno M, Ferrero TJ, Granelli V, Marin V, Albertelli G, Fabiano M (2006) Across shore variability and trophodynamic features of meiofauna in a 47 microtidal beach of the NW Mediterranean. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 66:357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.08.016
Moreno M, Vezzulli L, Marin V, Laconi P, Albertelli G, Fabiano M (2008) The use of meiofauna diversity as an indicator of pollution in harbours. ICES J Mar Sci 65(8):1428–1435. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsn116
Moreno M, Semprucci F, Vezzulli L, Balsamo M, Fabiano M, Albertelli G (2011) The use of nematodes in assessing ecological quality status in the Mediterranean coastal ecosystems. Ecol Indic 11(2):328–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.05.011
Mouawad R, Daou C, Khalaf G, Hage K, Lteif M (2012) The study of meiofaunal communities on lebanese sandy beaches and evaluation of water quality. INOCCNRS Land-Sea Interactions in the Coastal Zone, Jounieh-Lebanon, pp 06–08
Oksanem J et al (2022) Vegan: Community Ecology Package. Version 2.6-2. R package
Paoli L, Grassi A, Vannini A, Maslaňáková I, Bil’ová I, Bačkor M, Loppi S (2015) Epiphytic lichens as indicators of environmental quality around a municipal solid waste landfill (C Italy). Waste Manag 42:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.04.033
Peña-Alonso C, Hernández-Calvento L, Pérez-Chacón E, Ariza-Solé E (2017) The relationship between heritage, recreational quality and geomorphological vulnerability in the coastal zone: a case study of beach systems in the Canary Islands. Ecol Indic 82:420–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.014
Penna N, Capellacci S, Ricci F (2004) The influence of the Po River discharge on phytoplankton bloom dynamics along the coastline of Pesaro (Italy) in the Adriatic Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 48(3–4):321–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2003.08.007
Pereira DP, Santos DMS, Carvalho Neta AV, Cruz CF, Carvalho Neta RNF (2014) Alterações morfológicas em brânquias de Oreochromis niloticus (Pisces, Cichlidae) como biomarcadores de poluição aquática na Laguna da Jansen, São Luís, MA (Brasil). Biosci J 30(4):1213–1221
Pereira TJ, Gingold R, Villegas ADM, Rocha-Olivares A (2017) Patterns of spatial variation of meiofauna in sandy beaches of northwestern Mexico with contrasting levels of disturbance. Thalassas Int J Mar Sci 34(1):53–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-017-0038-x
Pilouk S, Koottatep T (2017) Environmental performance indicators as the key for eco-industrial parks in Thailand. J Clean Prod 156:614–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.076
Raffaelli D (1987) The behaviour of the nematode/copepod ratio in organic pollution studies. Mar Environ Res 23(2):135–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-1136(87)90042-0
Raffaelli DG, Mason CF (1981) Pollution monitoring with meiofauna, using the ratio of nematodes to copepods. Mar Pollut Bul 12(5):158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-326X(81)90227-7
Ranasinghe JA, Weisberg SB, Smith RW, Montagne DE, Thompson B, Oakden JM, Ritter KJ (2009) Calibration and evaluation of five indicators of benthic community condition in two California bay and estuary habitats. Mar Pollut Bul 59(1–3):5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.11.007
Rêgo JCL, Soares-Gomes A, da Silva FS (2018) Loss of vegetation cover in a tropical island of the Amazon coastal zone (Maranhão Island, Brazil). Land Use Policy 71:593–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.055
Rodrigues JB, da Silva Alves B, de Sousa Moraes MF, dos Santos Silva N (2020) Constatação do lançamento irregular de efluentes sanitários e resíduos sólidos na praia Ponta D’Areia, São Luís/MA. Eng Sci 8(2):68–74. https://doi.org/10.6008/CBPC2318-3055.2020.002.0007
Sahraeian N, Sahafi HH, Mosallanejad H, Ingels J, Semprucci F (2020) Temporal and spatial variability of free-living nematodes in a beach system characterized by domestic and industrial impacts (Bandar Abbas, Persian Gulf, Iran). Ecol Indic 118:106697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106697
Santos DM, Melo MRS, Mendes DCS, Rocha IKB, Silva JPL, Cantanhêde SM, Meletti PC (2014) Histological changes in gills of two fish species as indicators of water quality in Jansen lagoon (São Luís, Maranhão State, Brazil). Int J Environ Res Public Health 11(12):12927–12937. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111212927
Santos MEM, Silva CMC, Azevedo-Cutrim ACG (2021) Spatial-temporal distribution of Polychaeta in urbanized sandy beaches of northeastern Brazil: tools for environmental assessment. Oecol Australis 25(4):834–845. https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2021.2504.04
Sarkar D (2008) Lattice: multivariate data visualization with R. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75969-2
Schlacher TA, Thompson L (2012) Beach recreation impacts benthic invertebrates on ocean-exposed sandy shores. Biol Conserv 147(1):123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.022
Schlacher TA, Schoeman DS, Lastra M, Jones A, Dugan J, Scapini F, McLachlan A (2006) Neglected ecosystems bear the brunt of change. Ethol Ecol Evol 18(4):349–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2006.9522701
Schlacher TA et al (2007) Sandy beaches at the brink. Divers Distrib 13(5):556–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2006.9522701
Schlacher TA, Richardson D, McLean I (2008) Impacts of off-road vehicles (ORVs) on macrobenthic assemblages on sandy beaches. Environ Manage 41(6):878–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9071-0
Semprucci F, Colantoni P, Baldelli G, Rocchi M, Balsamo M (2010) The distribution of meiofauna on back-reef sandy platforms in the Maldives (Indian Ocean). Mar Ecol 31(4):592–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.2010.00383.x
Semprucci F, Sbrocca C, Rocchi M, Balsamo M (2015a) Temporal changes of the meiofaunal assemblage as a tool for the assessment of the ecological quality status. J Mar Biol Assoc U K 95(2):247–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315414001271
Semprucci F, Frontalini F, Sbrocca C, Du Châtelet EA, Bout-Roumazeilles V, Coccioni R, Balsamo M (2015b) Meiobenthos and free-living nematodes as tools for biomonitoring environments affected by riverine impact. Environ Monit Assess 187(5):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4493-7
Serra JS, Farias Filho MS (2019) Expansão urbana e impactos ambientais na zona costeira norte do município de São Luís (MA). Raega Espaço Geogr Anál 46(1):07–24. https://doi.org/10.5380/raega.v46i1.52552
Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(3/4):591–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709
Silva THS (2021) Levantamento dos pontos de lançamento de esgoto bruto na Laguna da Jansen, na cidade de São Luís, estado do Maranhão. Brasil Rev Meio Ambiente Sustentab 10(21):28–46. https://doi.org/10.22292/mas.v10i21.948
Simpson LG et al (2022) Permute: Functions for Generating Restricted Permutations of Data. Version 0.9-7. R package. Disponível: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=permute
Suguio K (1973) Introdução à sedimentologia. Blücher, São Paulo
Sun X, Zhou H, Hua E, Xu S, Cong B, Zhang Z (2014) Meiofauna and its sedimentary environment as an integrated indication of anthropogenic disturbance to sandy beach ecosystems. Mar Pollut Bull 88(1–2):260–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.08.033
ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67(5):1167–1179. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938672
Tilbert S, de Castro FJV, Tavares G, Nogueira Júnior MN (2019) Spatial variation of meiofaunal tardigrades in a small tropical estuary (~ 6 S; Brazil). Mar Freshw Res 70(8):1094–1104. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF18222
Van Damme D, Heip C, Willems KA (1984) Influence of pollution on the harpacticoid copepods of two North Sea estuaries. Hydrobiologia 112(2):143–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006919
Vanaverbeke J, Gheskiere T, Steyaert M, Vincx M (2002) Nematode assemblages from subtidal sandbanks in the Southern Bight of the North Sea: effect of small sedimentological differences. J Sea Res 48(3):197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-1101(02)00165-X
Vanaverbeke J, Soetaert K, Vincx M (2004) Changes in morphometric characteristics of nematode communities during a spring phytoplankton bloom deposition. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 273:139–146
Vanaverbeke J, Steyaert M, Soetaert K, Rousseau V, Van Gansbeke D, Parent JY, Vincx M (2004a) Changes in structural and functional diversity of nematode communities during a spring phytoplankton bloom in the southern North Sea. J Sea Res 52(4):281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2004.02.004
Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37(1):29–38
Weisberg SB, Thompson B, Ranasinghe JA, Montagne DE, Cadien DB, Dauer DM, Word JQ (2008) The level of agreement among experts applying best professional judgment to assess the condition of benthic infaunal communities. Ecol Indic 8(4):389–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.04.001
Wentworth CK (1922) A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J Geol 30(5):377–392. https://doi.org/10.1086/622910
Wickham H (2016) Programming with ggplot2. ggplot2. Springer, Cham, pp 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_12
Xu W, Shin PK, Sun J (2022) Organic enrichment induces shifts in the trophic position of infauna in a subtropical benthic food web, Hong Kong. Front Mar Sci 9:937477. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.937477
Zeppilli D, Sarrazin J, Leduc D, Arbizu PM, Fontaneto D et al (2015) Is the meiofauna a good indicator for climate change and anthropogenic impacts? Mar Biodivers 45(3):505–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-015-0359-z
Zho Y, Ning L, Bai X (2018) Spatial and temporal changes of human disturbances and their effects on landscape patterns in the Jiangsu coastal zone, China. Ecol Indic 93:111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04
Funding
CAPES finance code 001.
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão - FAPEMA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Santos, M.E.M., Silva, T.C., Ferreira Sirqueira, J. et al. Spatial marine meiofauna variations in areas undergoing different disturbance levels on the Amazon coast. Biologia 79, 483–494 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-023-01536-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-023-01536-x