Abstract
This paper aims to discuss an environmental, social, and economic analysis of energy utilization of crop residues from life cycle perspectives in China. The methodologies employed to achieve this objective are environmental life cycle assessment (E-LCA), life cycle cost (LCC), and social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). Five scenarios are developed based on the conversion technologies and final bioenergy products. The system boundaries include crop residue collection, transportation, pre-treatment, and conversion process. The replaced amounts of energy are also taken into account in the E-LCA analysis. The functional unit is defined as 1 MJ of energy produced. Eight impact categories are considered besides climate change in E-LCA. The investment capital cost and salary cost are collected and compared in the life cycle of the scenarios. Three stakeholders and several subcategories are considered in the S-LCA analysis defined by UNEP/ SETAS guidelines. The results show that the energy utilization of crop residue has carbon emission factors of 0.09–0.18 kg (CO2 eq per 1 MJ), and presents a net carbon emissions reduction of 0.03–0.15 kg (CO2 eq per 1 MJ) compared with the convectional electricity or petrol, but the other impacts should be paid attention to in the biomass energy scenarios. The energy utilization of crop residues can bring economic benefit to local communities and the society, but the working conditions of local workers need to be improved in future biomass energy development.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Gracceva F, Zeniewski P. A systemic approach to assessing energy security in a low-carbon EU energy system. Applied Energy, 2014, 123: 335–348
Ang B W, Choong W, Ng T. Energy security: definitions, dimensions and indexes. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 42: 1077–1093
Chu S, Majumdar A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature, 2012, 488(7411): 294–303
Edenhofer O, Hirth L, Knopf B, Pahle M, Schlömer S, Schmid E, Ueckerdt F. On the economics of renewable energy sources. Energy Economics, 2013, 40: S12–S23
Lund H, Mathiesen B V. Energy system analysis of 100% renewable energy systems—the case of Denmark in years 2030 and 2050. Energy, 2009, 34(5): 524–531
Scarlat N, Dallemand J, Monforti-Ferrario F, Nita V. The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: policies and facts. Environmental Development, 2015, 15: 3–34
Johnson E. Goodbye to carbon neutral: getting biomass footprints right. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2009, 29(3): 165–168
Budzianowski W M. Negative carbon intensity of renewable energy technologies involving biomass or carbon dioxide as inputs. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(9): 6507–6521
Arneth A, Sitch S, Pongratz J, Stocker B D, Ciais P, Poulter B, Bayer A D, Bondeau A, Calle L, Chini L P, Gasser T, Fader M, Friedlingstein P, Kato E, Li W, Lindeskog M, Nabel J E M S, Pugh T A M, Robertson E, Viovy N, Yue C, Zaehle S. Historical carbon dioxide emissions caused by land-use changes are possibly larger than assumed. Nature Geoscience, 2017, 10(2): 79–84
Lambin E F, Meyfroidt P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(9): 3465–3472
Bringezu S, O'Brien M, Schütz H. Beyond biofuels: assessing global land use for domestic consumption of biomass: a conceptual and empirical contribution to sustainable management of global resources. Land Use Policy, 2012, 29(1): 224–232
Abbasi T, Abbasi S. Biomass energy and the environmental impacts associated with its production and utilization. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(3): 919–937
Joselin Herbert G M, Unni Krishnan A. Quantifying environmental performance of biomass energy. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 59: 292–308
Cherubini F, Bird N D, Cowie A, Jungmeier G, Schlamadinger B, Woess-Gallasch S. Energy-and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2009, 53(8): 434–447
Cherubini F, Ulgiati S. Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems—a LCA case study. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(1): 47–57
Liu L, Zhuang D, Jiang D, Fu J. Assessment of the biomass energy potentials and environmental benefits of Jatropha curcas L. in Southwest China. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2013, 56: 342–350
Renó M L G, Lora E E S, Palacio J C E, Venturini O J, Buchgeister J, Almazan O. A LCA (life cycle assessment) of the methanol production from sugarcane bagasse. Energy, 2011, 36(6): 3716–3726
Astrup T F, Tonini D, Turconi R, Boldrin A. Life cycle assessment of thermal waste-to-energy technologies: review and recommendations. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2015, 37: 104–115
Patel M, Zhang X, Kumar A. Techno-economic and life cycle assessment on lignocellulosic biomass thermochemical conversion technologies: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 53: 1486–1499
Browne J, Nizami A, Thamsiriroj T, Murphy J D. Assessing the cost of biofuel production with increasing penetration of the transport fuel market: a case study of gaseous biomethane in Ireland. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(9): 4537–4547
Duer H, Christensen P O. Socio-economic aspects of different biofuel development pathways. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2010, 34(2): 237–243
Fazio S, Barbanti L. Energy and economic assessments of bioenergy systems based on annual and perennial crops for temperate and tropical areas. Renewable Energy, 2014, 69: 233–241
Keller H, Rettenmaier N, Reinhardt G A. Integrated life cycle sustainability assessment—a practical approach applied to biorefineries. Applied Energy, 2015, 154: 1072–1081
Ekener E, Hansson J, Larsson A, Peck P. Developing life cycle sustainability assessment methodology by applying values-based sustainability weighting-tested on biomass based and fossil transportation fuels. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 181: 337–351
Zhao G. Assessment of potential biomass energy production in China towards 2030 and 2050. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 2018, 37(1): 47–66
Asian Development Bank. Preparing National Strategy for Rural Biomass Renewable Energy Development. Building Science. Manila: Asian Development Bank, 2008
Ministry of Agriculture. National Inventory and Evaluation Report of Crop Straw Resources. Beijing: Ministry of Agriculture of China, 2010 (in Chinese)
Zhan H Y. Supply and utilization of non-wood fibers and waste papers in China's per industry. China Pulp & Paper, 2010, 8: 021
Jiang B, Sun Z, Liu M. China's energy development strategy under the low-carbon economy. Energy, 2010, 35(11): 4257–4264
Zhang Z X. China in the transition to a low-carbon economy. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(11): 6638–6653
Ministry of Agriculture of China. Agricultural Biomass Energy Development Plan (2007–2015). Beijing, China, 2007 (in Chinese)
National Energy Administration of China. China Plans Nationwide Use of Ethanol Gasoline by 2020. Beijing, China, 2017 (in Chinese)
Jaleta M, Kassie M, Erenstein O. Determinants of maize stover utilization as feed, fuel and soil amendment in mixed crop-livestock systems, Ethiopia. Agricultural Systems, 2015, 134: 17–23
Lehtomäki A, Viinikainen T A, Rintala J A. Screening boreal energy crops and crop residues for methane biofuel production. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2008, 32(6): 541–550
International Energy Agency. Technology Roadmap-biofuels for Transport. Paris, France, 2011
Abdoulmoumine N, Adhikari S, Kulkarni A, Chattanathan S. A review on biomass gasification syngas cleanup. Applied Energy, 2015, 155: 294–307
Lan W, Chen G, Zhu X, Wang X, Xu B. Progress in techniques of biomass conversion into syngas. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2015, 88(2): 151–156
ISO. Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework. ISO 14040, 2006
ISO. Environmental management-life cycle assessment-requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044, 2006
Benoît C, Norris G A, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Prakash S, Ugaya C, Beck T. The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2010, 15(2): 156–163
Jørgensen A, Herrmann I T, Bjørn A. Analysis of the link between a definition of sustainability and the life cycle methodologies. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18(8): 1440–1449
Russo Garrido S, Parent J, Beaulieu L, Revéret J P. A literature review of type I S-LCA—making the logic underlying methodological choices explicit. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23(3): 432–444
Hoogmartens R, Van Passel S, Van Acker K, Dubois M. Bridging the gap between LCA, LCC and CBA as sustainability assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2014, 48: 27–33
Valdivia S, Ugaya C M, Hildenbrand J, Traverso M, Mazijn B, Sonnemann G. A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio 20. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18(9): 1673–1685
Jiang D, Zhuang D, Fu J, Huang Y, Wen K. Bioenergy potential from crop residues in China: availability and distribution. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(3): 1377–1382
Agbor V B, Cicek N, Sparling R, Berlin A, Levin D B. Biomass pretreatment: fundamentals toward application. Biotechnology Advances, 2011, 29(6): 675–685
Evans A, Strezov V, Evans T J. Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13(5): 1082–1088
United Nations Environment Programme. Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. Paris: United Nations Environment Programme—Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Life Cycle Initiative, 2009
Miret C, Chazara P, Montastruc L, Negny S, Domenech S. Design of bioethanol green supply chain: comparison between first and second generation biomass concerning economic, environmental and social criteria. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2016, 85: 16–35
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. 2011, available at the website of srren.ipcc-wg3.de
Editorial Committee of China Electric Power. China Electric Power Yearbook 2015. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2015
Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21(9): 1218–1230
Qiu H, Yan J, Lei Z, Sun D. Rising wages and energy consumption transition in rural China. Energy Policy, 2018, 119: 545–553
Wang X, Yamauchi F, Otsuka K, Huang J. Wage growth, landholding, and mechanization in Chinese agriculture. World Development, 2016, 86: 30–45
Benoit-Norris C, Cavan D A, Norris G. Identifying social impacts in product supply chains: overview and application of the social hotspot database. Sustainability, 2012, 4(9): 1946–1965
Subramanian K, Chau C, Yung W K. Relevance and feasibility of the existing social LCA methods and case studies from a decision-making perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 171: 690–703
Tonini D, Astrup T. LCA of biomass-based energy systems: a case study for Denmark. Applied Energy, 2012, 99: 234–246
Yang J, Chen B. Global warming impact assessment of a crop residue gasification project—a dynamic LCA perspective. Applied Energy, 2014, 122: 269–279
González-García S, Iribarren D, Susmozas A, Dufour J, Murphy R J. Life cycle assessment of two alternative bioenergy systems involving Salix spp. biomass: bioethanol production and power generation. Applied Energy, 2012, 95: 111–122
Thornley P, Gilbert P, Shackley S, Hammond J. Maximizing the greenhouse gas reductions from biomass: the role of life cycle assessment. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2015, 81: 35–43
Boschiero M, Cherubini F, Nati C, Zerbe S. Life cycle assessment of bioenergy production from orchards woody residues in Northern Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112: 2569–2580
Turconi R, Tonini D, Nielsen C F, Simonsen C G, Astrup T. Environmental impacts of future low-carbon electricity systems: detailed life cycle assessment of a Danish case study. Applied Energy, 2014, 132: 66–73
Gullberg A T, Ohlhorst D, Schreurs M. Towards a low carbon energy future—renewable energy cooperation between Germany and Norway. Renewable Energy, 2014, 68: 216–222
Yan H, Liu J, Huang H Q, Tao B, Cao M. Assessing the consequence of land use change on agricultural productivity in China. Global and Planetary Change, 2009, 67(1–2): 13–19
Finkbeiner M. Indirect land use change-help beyond the hype? Biomass and Bioenergy, 2014, 62: 218–221
Nishiguchi S, Tabata T. Assessment of social, economic, and environmental aspects of woody biomass energy utilization: direct burning and wood pellets. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 57: 1279–1286
Cowell R, Bristow G, Munday M. Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2011, 54(4): 539–557
Sun J, Chen J, Xi Y, Hou J. Mapping the cost risk of agricultural residue supply for energy application in rural China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2011, 19(2–3): 121–128
Zhang S Q, Deng M S, Shan M, Zhou C, Liu W, Xu X, Yang X. Energy and environmental impact assessment of straw return and substitution of straw briquettes for heating coal in rural China. Energy Policy, 2019, 128: 654–664
Liska A J, Yang H, Milner M, Goddard S, Blanco-Canqui H, Pelton M P, Fang X X, Zhu H, Suyker A E. Biofuels from crop residue can reduce soil carbon and increase CO2 emissions. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4(5): 398–401
Cambero C, Sowlati T. Assessment and optimization of forest biomass supply chains from economic, social and environmental perspectives—a review of literature. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 36: 62–73
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Electronic Supplementary Material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Li, J., Liu, H. et al. Environmental, social, and economic assessment of energy utilization of crop residue in China. Front. Energy 15, 308–319 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0696-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0696-x