Introduction

Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) are one-dimensional structures and possess many unique mechanical, electrical, thermal and optical properties (Z. J. Han et al. 2012). This makes the SWCNTs networks among the most outstanding products for various applications including nanoelectronics and energy solar cells, storage devices, biosensors and several others (Z. Han and Ostrikov 2010). SWCNTs are generally synthesized by three common methods containing arc discharge (Journet et al. 1997), laser ablation (Guo et al. 1995) and chemical vapor deposition (CVD), which are the catalytic decomposition of hydrocarbon on transition metals at elevated temperatures (Andrews et al. 2006; Ghosh et al. 2007; M. Kumar and Ando 2003; R. Kumar et al. 2011). The CVD process is one of the main techniques for industrial large scale (Fathy 2017). The SWCNTs nucleation and growth are impressed by many factors such as catalyst, pressure, gas, and temperature (Fisher et al. 2011). Different sources carbon in gas-form were used extensively as SWCNTs precursors such as methane (CH4), carbon monoxide (CO), ethanol (CH3CH2OH), and ethylene (C2H4) (Liu et al. 2010). Various types of supports like magnesia (MgO), silica (SiO2), alumina (Al2O3), zeolite, and mesoporous materials such as MCM-41 are used for SWCNTs production (Wenelska and Mijowska 2019). Catalytic synthesis is one of the most popular methods to control the selectivity SWCNTs with high yield and comparatively low cost (Lim et al. 2003). The widest catalysts applied for fabrication of SWCNTs are transition metals such as iron, cobalt, and nickel (Zhang et al. 2014). Previous reports have shown the SWCNTs diameters are quite similar to diameters of catalytic nanoparticles (Yiming Li et al. 2001). Sakurai et al. 2012 have shown that small nanoparticles (iron as a catalyst in an AlOx support layer) are suitable for SWCNTs growth and produce a high performance, long length, high surface area, and alignment. The SWCNTs usually contain carbonaceous fragments such as transition metals, amorphous carbon, and graphitic nanoparticles, and thus these impurities avoid their applications. Many purification methods have been developed which can be classified into four main methods: acid oxidation (Ribeiro et al. 2021; Rinzler et al. 1998), gas oxidation (Goak et al. 2020b; Zimmerman et al. 2000), chromatography (Duesberg et al. 1998) and filtration (Yu Li et al. 2004). The most frequently utilized agent, the simplest and most useful method for oxidation of carbon nanotubes, is refluxing with nitric acid (Jeynes et al. 2008; Tchoul et al. 2007).

In this paper, we have described SWCNTs growth by iron oxide nanoparticles/alumina (Fe2O3/Al2O3) catalyst by CVD technique under CH4 gas. The iron compound acts as a specific catalyst for the growth of SWCNTs, when alumina is as a support. The current synthesis method does not allow any pre-treatment of the catalyst precursor to make an active catalyst precursor by using H2 gas. Hence, our work avoids toxic chemicals and harmful gases such as H2, CO, etc. Additionally, it is an ecologically beneficial and oxidant material that may be an impressive precursor for SWCNTs development. This research attempts to find a less destructive chemical for the purification of SWCNTs. Thus, the research would examine the effect of nitric acid and sodium hydroxide for purification. This method preferentially purifies without introducing sidewall defects and shortening of the chain length.

Experimental

Synthesis of iron-oleate (Fe-oleate) complex

A Fe-oleate complex was prepared including sodium oleate and iron chlorides. Sodium oleate was obtained by reacting sodium hydroxide anhydrous and oleic acid. At first 0.088 g sodium hydroxide anhydrous (2.2 mmol) and 0.62 g oleic acid (2.2 mmol) were dissolved in 7 ml distilled water and stirred for 2 h at 65 °C. Then 0.2 g of iron chloride (0.74 mmol) and 0.67 g of sodium oleate (2.2 mmol) were added to a mixture of distilled water (6 ml), ethanol (8 ml), and hexane (14 ml). The brown-orange solution is refluxed for 4 h at 70 °C. After completion of the reaction, the upper organic phase including the Fe-oleate complex was washed four times with 4 ml deionized water in a separatory funnel. Finally, Hexane was vaporized after washing and Fe-oleate was formed in the solid form of wax (Park et al. 2004).

Synthesis of Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles

For the synthesis of Fe2O3 particles, 0.34 g of Fe-oleate (0.5 mmol) and 0.24 g of glycerol (2 mmol) were blended in 10 ml of ethanol at room temperature. The combination was annealed to 180 °C at a steady heating rate of 10 °C/min and then held at this temperature for 30 min. As the reaction continued, the primary brown clear solution became black-brown. After the reaction, the compound was quickly cooled to room temperature, and the precipitate of the nanoparticles was formed by the addition of 5 mL acetone. Fe2O3 were isolated by centrifugation and dispersed in non-polar solvents such as n-hexane or chloroform (Kim et al. 2011).

Synthesis of Fe 2 O 3 /Al 2 O 3

The detailed manner for preparing the catalyst is as follows: 2 ml of dispersed Fe2O3 solution in chloroform and 2 ml DMF were stirred at room temperature for 3 days. Then 1.2 g Al2O3 (11 mmol) was added to the solution at room temperature for 3 h. The temperature of the solution was kept at 50 °C until a lot of precipitation was produced. The precipitation was dried for 3 h at 150 °C. The catalyst with weight ratio (Fe2O3/Al2O3 = 1:16) was obtained.

Growth of SWCNTs

The SWCNTs were grown at 1000 °C using Fe2O3/Al2O3 as a catalyst by CVD method (Fig. 1). Fe2O3/Al2O3 (761 mg) was placed in a boat located in the middle of the quartz reactor. The temperature of the CVD reactor increased to 1000 °C under the N2 gas flow at 60 sccm during a period of 100 min. At 1000 °C, CH4 gas was passed through the reactor at 160 sccm for 30 min to grow the nanotubes. After growth, the CVD system was cooled to room temperature in a N2 environment. It is worth mentioning that mass flow controllers (MFCs) were used to control the flow of gases (Billing et al. 2018).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Growth protocol used to production SWCNTs in a CVD reactor

Purification of SWCNTs

The raw product was purified with refluxing in 6 M NaOH for 6 h and 6 M HNO3 solutions for 1 h at 100 °C to eliminate the support and Fe2O3 particles, respectively. After NaOH treatment sample washing with deionized water. Lastly, the purified SWCNTs were washed with distilled water and dried for 12 h at 110 °C (Boskovic et al. 2013).

Characterization techniques

The morphology and structure of Fe2O3 was studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis (Hitachi, s4160, japan). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were carried out on a (Philips, cm30, Netherlands). X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) analysis was recorded on PANalytical X’PERTPRO diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 angstrom, 40 kV, 30 mA). Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopic measurements (Mattson 1000 spectrophotometer) were reported from 400 to 4000 cm−1. The sample palette was built in KBr and the background spectra were subtracted from the sample spectra to ensure that the actual sample was analyzed. The Raman spectrum of the SWCNTs has been collected by the Takram P50C0R10 Raman spectrometer with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm. The magnetic characterization was recorded by a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM: magnetic daghigh kavir, model MDKB) with a maximum magnetic field about 2Tesla at room temperature. The elemental structure was analyzed using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis (MIRAIII, TESCAN, Czechia). Thermal stability has been studied by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) (STA 504 model, German company BAHR) under air and argon atmosphere from zero temperature to 1000 °C.

Results and discussion

VSM analysis

Magnetization measurements of Fe2O3 nanoparticles were performed by using a VSM with the magnetic field up to 2T (Fig. 2). Magnetic properties are mostly related to the particle size (Goya et al. 2003). As a result, small magnetic nanoparticles contain very small magnetic moments and have shown an approximately linear relationship between magnetization and magnetic field, that is very close to the magnetic property of paramagnetic materials (Jiles 2015; Lee and Hyeon 2012).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Hysteresis loops for the Fe2O3

FT-IR analysis

The FT-IR spectra of Fe2O3 nanoparticles, SWCNTs and purified SWCNTs are shown in Fig. 3. Absorption bands located at 3002, 2921, and 2850 cm−1 in the spectrum of the Fe2O3 nanoparticles are ascribed to the stretching vibrations of ν(CH) olefinic, νasymmetric (CH2) and νsymmetric (CH2) of oleic acid, whereas the bands at 738 cm−1 correspond to the Fe–O stretching vibration (Adireddy et al. 2009; Bayazit et al. 2015; Kwon et al. 2007; Park et al. 2004). These groups were used in the preparation of Fe-oleate and consequently the production of Fe2O3 particles. The adsorption bands located at 1435 cm−1 and 1684 cm−1 are characteristic bands of aromatic C=C. Bands at 1300–1000 cm−1 are related to C–O stretching which indicate the surface of SWCNTs has some oxygen including functional groups because NaOH/HNO3. The band 738 cm−1 in the spectrum of purified SWCNTs, that is removed compared with SWCNTs, is related to the Fe–O bond after NaOH treatment (Fig. 3c) (Kysil et al. 2017; Levin and Brandon 1998). Figure 3d shows SWCNTs treated with HNO3 solution to remove Al2O3. This process effectively removed support. But in general, the simultaneous effect of NaOH/HNO3 is needed for significant and efficient removal, as seen from the results of Fig. 3e. As a result, a large amount of impurities and catalyst support were successfully separated by the acid/base digestion purification method.

Fig. 3
figure 3

FT-IR analysis of a Fe2O3 b SWCNTs c base treatment d acid treatment e acid/base treatment

SEM and TEM analysis

The average crystalline size and morphology of the Fe2O3 nanoparticles, SWCNTs and purified SWCNTs were determined by TEM images. Figure 4a, b displays the Fe2O3 particles with mainly spherical form and an average particle size of 5–6 nm (Shukoor et al. 2007). Figure 4c, d shows images of growth and purified SWCNTs by refluxing in NaOH (6 M) for 6 h at 100 °C and in HNO3 (6 M) for 1 h at 100 °C. In addition to the bundle of nanotubes, the dark and gray spots structure in Fig. 4d comes from the support and metallic nanoparticles. Figure 4f, g shows unremarkable changes from the raw sample, indicating that acid/base treatment is sufficient. The decrease in the amount of impurities, as indicated by gray and black groups, is unobserved on the surface of the bundle of nanotubes. These results showed that by choosing the appropriate method and time, impurities can be selectively removed from nanotubes. Therefore, the key to producing high-quality purified SWCNTs with high performance is acid/base reflux (Mattevi et al. 2008; Noda et al. 2007). SEM analysis shows the morphology of Fe2O3. This micrograph indicated (see Fig. S1 in ESI†) highly uniform grains distribution.

Fig. 4
figure 4

a, b TEM image of Fe2O3 in different scales and the inset displays particle size distribution ce raw SWCNTs sample f, g purified SWCNTs

The main problem in the purification of SWCNTs by acid/base treatment is the loss of a large number of nanotubes due to inappropriate conditions. Table 1 compares the purification conditions of SWCNTs in NaOH/HNO3 solutions. The present research includes advantages such as: high efficiency, easy operation, short time, no damage to SWCNTs, and low consumption of reagents. But in other methods, the purification efficiency decreased with increasing temperature, acid concentration and time. Among all the methods of SWCNTs reported in Table 1, our work has the highest efficiency with 6 M NaOH/HNO3 for 6/1 h at 100 °C.

Table 1 Comparison of the conditions used for the purification of SWCNTs

XRD analysis

XRD analysis was used to display the crystal structure of the nanoparticle. XRD pattern of Fe2O3 has shown mostly maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) crystal structure (Fig. S2 in ESI†). Although it is difficult to distinguish between magnetite and maghemite, the XRD pattern is similar to that of maghemite due to their very similar XRD patterns. All the diffraction peaks of nano-particles are consistent with the standard structure (JCPDS card No. 39-1346). The results indicated that the products consisted of pure phases (Table S1 in ESI†) (Hyeon et al. 2001; Kim et al. 2011; Rahman et al. 2014).

Raman spectroscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray

Raman spectroscopy (Fig. 5) and energy-dispersive X-ray (Fig. 6) identified the growth and purity of SWCNTs. Figure 5a, b displays the G-band, D-band and radial breathing mode (RBM) of raw and purified SWCNTs. The RBMs are composed of lower frequencies in the range between 200 and 400 cm−1, which frequencies depend on the tube diameters. Moreover, RBM is an important part giving further structural information for (n, m) assignments, such as on the chirality in SWCNTs. The RBM bands can be detected at 248.85, 273.90 and 286.40 cm−1. Therefore, it is possible to devote the bands to the (12,0), (9,3) and (9,2) chirality under the excitation energy of 2.33 eV (532 nm), respectively (Hiura et al. 1993; Moon et al. 2001). Raw and pure SWCNTs show a band at around 1589 and 1590 cm−1 assigned to G band. The G band detached into two components (Dresselhaus et al. 2010). These two distinct bands include (G+), which are caused by the vibration of carbon atoms along the nanotube axis, and (G), which are motived by the vibration of carbon atoms along the peripheral direction of SWCNTs. These bands was observed in the regions of 1590, 1588, 1558 and 1557 cm−1, respectively (Saito et al. 2011). An additional band is considered near 1345 and 1344 cm−1 called D band, which is related with defects or disorder in SWCNTs, such as amorphous carbon and heteroatoms. The origin of the D band is thought to be a double-resonance process. The G′ band, which is the overtone of the D band, is located at around 2667 and 2661 cm−1. The ratio of the D and G-bands intensities distinguish relative defect content in the carbon lattice. The decrease in the intensity ratio of D and G-band (ID/IG) after purification indicates the quality of SWCNTs (Hou et al. 2017; Otsuka et al. 2014; Wunderlich et al. 2008).

Fig. 5
figure 5

a Protocol for the purification of SWCNTs b Raman spectra of raw and purified SWCNTs at 532 nm laser excitations

Fig. 6
figure 6

a EDX analysis of raw SWCNTs b EDX analysis for purified SWCNTs

TGA

TGA analysis is a beneficial technique to evaluate the structure, purity and thermal stability of SWCNTs along with the content of residual impurities. Figure 7 shows the TGA study of the raw and purified SWCNTs. The remaining impurities in raw SWCNTs are ∼25%. There is no considerable weight loss before 400 °C, so there is a significant amount of impurities. In the purified SWCNTs, the greatest rate of impurities removes up at 650 °C. As a result, after acid/base treatment the impurity amount is decreased to less than 5% (Matsuzawa et al. 2014).

Fig. 7
figure 7

TGA of raw and purified SWCNTs

Conclusions

Purification of SWCNTs materials depends on the removal of impurities such as metal and carbon impurities, so that the structure of the actual SWCNTs remains intact. An uniform nanoparticle was formed by controlled thermal decomposition of the Fe-oleate complex. The SWCNTs is grown using Fe2O3/Al2O3 as a catalyst without the presence of hydrogen gas under CH4 gas. The SWCNTs are notable for having a narrow diameter distribution and chirality (12,0), (9,3) and (9,2). This nanotube can be efficiently purified by NaOH/HNO3 treatment. The TEM images display purified SWCNT free of carbon impurities and metals. The great quality of SWCNTs was defined by the (ID/IG) as shown in Raman spectroscopy. In this method, the purification time is shortened and modified effectively. As a result, nanotubes with a small diameter are not destroyed. The general availability of purified SWCNTs makes it possible to understand their potentially attractive applications as well as to understand their fundamental properties.