Introduction

Diabetes is a multifactorial metabolic disease characterized by high fasting blood glucose levels and impaired insulin secretion or insulin resistance [1]. In 2017, the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) reported that about 451 million individuals had diabetes worldwide. According to the current growth rate, this number is expected to reach 653 million by 2045 [2]. The complications of T2DM can lead to disabilities and can also be life threatening [3]. The primary treatment methods for T2DM include rational dietary habits, increased physical activity, and medication [4]. In the 1950s, bariatric surgery was primarily used to address severe obesity and reduce weight [5]. In the 1980s, a clinical follow-up study found that the treatment of obesity via bariatric surgery also relieved the high glucose levels to varying extents [6]. Furthermore, abundant evidence suggests that obesity-related surgery has a major effect on resolving T2DM and may be better than traditional therapy [7]. At present, metabolic surgery is recommended as the treatment method for T2DM by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the IDF [8].

Biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) currently appear to be the most effective in the treatment of T2DM among the different types of metabolic surgery; the remission rates are about 95 and 75%, respectively [9, 10]. The bypassed intestine in BPD, which is much longer than that in RYGBP, almost prevents the chyme from refluxing into the duodenum. In particular, the exclusion of a shorter portion of the small intestine leads to a larger amount of intestinal content reflux into the duodenum. Moreover, the hypoglycemic effect of RYGBP is superior to that of Billroth II (BII) reconstruction in our clinical study. In fact, a postoperative barium meal examination confirmed that duodenal reflux was more likely to occur after BII gastrojejunostomy. In a previous study, Silvio et al. reported the occurrence of reflux into the biliopancreatic limb after RYGBP [11]. In addition, BII reconstruction after subtotal gastrectomy for cancer or intractable ulcers was more effective in terms of improving T2DM, as compared with Billroth I reconstruction [12]. The reflux of intestinal contents into the duodenum may be the key factor responsible for the difference in effects among these operation methods. Thus, we speculate that isolating the duodenum from food plays an important role in blood glucose regulation. To further assess these mechanisms, we assigned streptozotocin (STZ)-induced T2DM rats to undergo sham operation (SO), new duodenal-jejunal bypass (NDJB), or new duodenal-jejunal bypass with a tube (NDJBT) and compared the metabolic outcomes after these surgeries. Accordingly, we aimed to evaluate the effects of excluding the duodenum alone and inhibiting intestinal content refluxing to the duodenum on glucose metabolism.

Materials and Methods

Animals

All 5-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats (146 g on average) were purchased from the Laboratory Animal Center of Fuzhou University (Fujian, China). Animals were housed in a controlled room at 22 °C with a 12-h day/night cycle (lights on at 07:00 and lights off at 19:00). The rats were given free access to tap water and fed on a high-fat diet (HFD; 10.0% lard, 2.5% cholesterol, 20.0% saccharose, and 67.5% basic diet) for 4 weeks and were then intraperitoneally injected with a low dose of STZ (30 mg/kg; Sigma, USA) to induce hyperglycemia. Seventy-two hours and 1 week after the injection, random blood glucose measurements were performed using a glucometer (Bayer Health Care LLC, Germany) from the tail veins. A total of 30 rats with random blood glucose levels ≥ 16.7 mmol/l were considered diabetic and were assigned to the SO (n = 10), NDJB (n = 10), and NDJBT (n = 10) groups. Each group finally had eight rats after excluding the two rats with minimum weight. All the experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Utilization Committee of Fuzhou General Hospital.

Surgical Interventions

Operations were performed at the rat surgery laboratory of the Animal Center of Comparative Medicine at Fuzhou General Hospital. Rats were provided access to water only for 12 h before the surgery. During the surgery, all animals were anesthetized with 5% ketamine hydrochloride (0.1 g/kg). Their abdominal hair was shaved, and the site was prepared with aqueous betadine. A middle abdominal incision of approximately 4 cm in length was made using a surgery scissor following localization of the stomach and small intestine. All the procedures lasted for 95 min on average, and a total of 24 rats were included after surgery.

NDJB

The duodenum was transected at a site 5 mm distal to the pylorus, and the duodenal stump was closed using 5–0 polypropylene (Shanghai Jinhuan Medical Needle, China). The jejunum was transected at a site 1 cm distal to the Treits, thus creating two ends. The distal end was used to create a duodeno-jejunostomy with the proximal end of the duodenum in an end-to-end manner. The biliopancreatic end was anastomosed to the alimentary limb at a site 15 cm distal to the duodeno-jejunal anastomosis via a Roux-en-Y anastomosis (Fig. 1a). An X-ray visual mark line was fixed on each side of the biliopancreatic limb and anastomoses.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Surgical model. a Duodenum exclusion is performed in the NDJB model. b In the NDJB model, a polyethylene tube (4 cm in length, 0.06 mm in thickness, and 0.4 cm in diameter) is inserted into the conjunction of the duodenum and jejunum and is fixed to the wall of the duodenum using a 5–0 silk suture at the base. c In the SO group, transection and re-anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract were performed at all sites where enterotomies were performed as part of NDJB

NDJBT

The procedure was similar to the NDJB, except for the additional placement of a polyethylene tube (Fig. 1b). An X-ray visual mark line was fixed at the proximal end of the tube which was then placed in the biliopancreatic limb, and also on each side of the biliopancreatic limb and at the site of anastomosis.

SO

The abdominal cavity was kept open for the same duration required to perform the NDJBT procedures. Transection and re-anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract were performed at all sites where enterotomies were performed as part of NDJB (Fig. 1c).

Measurement of Body Weight, Food Intake, and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Levels

In all the groups, body weight and food intake were measured at baseline, and at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks postoperatively. Blood samples were collected from the retrobulbar venous plexus of rats after overnight fasting at baseline, and at 2, 4, and 8 weeks postoperatively, and were stored in chilled EDTA tubes (MF Lab, 0.9–1.1 mm) containing a dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). After centrifugation (3000 rpm) at 4 °C for 5 min, the supernatant was immediately collected. The samples were stored at − 80 °C for future analysis. Active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) concentrations were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Cusabio Biotech Co.).

Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and Fasting Blood Glucose Levels

Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed preoperatively and at 2 and 8 weeks postoperatively. A fixed dose of 2 g/kg of 50% glucose was administered via gavage to animals following overnight fasting. The blood glucose (BG) levels were measured from the tail vein before and at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after the gavage. The fasting blood glucose (FBG) level was also measured prior to gavage. The area under the curves for OGTT (AUCOGTT) was calculated using the formula: 15 × BG0+ 30 × BG30 + 45 × BG60 + 30 × BG120.

Radiography

Plain abdominal radiography was performed 1 week after surgery to determine the presence of reflux into the biliopancreatic limb. After 12 h of overnight fasting, the rats were gavaged with 60% meglumine diatrizoate (1.5 ml/g) using a stomach tube (6.5 cm in length and 1.2 mm in diameter), and then anesthetized with 5% ketamine hydrochloride. The rats then underwent plain abdominal radiography.

Histological Analysis of the Intestine

Tissue samples were collected from the biliopancreatic limbs at 8 weeks after surgery. The specimens were fixed overnight in formalin and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections of 4-μm thickness were deparaffinized and stained using hematoxylin phloxine saffron. Histologic structures were observed under a light microscope. Each slide was scanned using the Aperio ScanScope CS System (Leica Microsys-temes SAS). Morphometric analyses were performed using the Calopix Software (TRIBVN) by measuring villus height and crypt depth. The mean values were used for statistical analyses.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. To compare the means between groups, we used one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to analyze continuous variables, followed by the Turkey test. All data were normally distributed. Overall analysis was performed using SPSS 20, and P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Body Weight and Food Intake

As observed in Fig. 2, due to perioperative food restriction and surgical stress, the body weight and food intake in all rats markedly decreased during the first postoperative week, and then gradually increased. Compared with that in the SO group, the postoperative body weight of the NDJB and NDJBT groups (Fig. 2a), as well as the food intake (Fig. 2b), was not significantly different.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Body weight and food intake. a Bodyweight of rats. No significant difference in body weight was observed among the three groups preoperatively and postoperatively. b Food intake of rats. No significant difference was observed among the three groups at all measuring time points

OGTT and AUCOGTT

No difference in OGTT and AUCOGTT values was observed among the three groups preoperatively (Fig. 3a, d). However, the NDJB and particularly the NDJBT group exhibited better glucose tolerance, as compared with the SO group, at 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively (Fig. 3b, c). Compared with the SO group, both the NDJB and NDJBT groups showed significantly lower AUCOGTT values at all postoperative time points (Fig. 3d). There was a difference in the AUCOGTT values at 8 weeks but no at 4 weeks postoperatively between the NDJB and NDJBT group.

Fig. 3
figure 3

OGTT and AUCOGTT. a OGTT values before operation. The OGTT values of rats did not significantly differ before surgery among the three groups. b OGTT values at 4 weeks after operation. c OGTT values at 8 weeks after operation. Compared with the values in the SO group, the OGTT values were significantly reduced at 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively in the NDJB and NDJBT groups. d The AUCOGTT values did not differ between the NDJB and NDJBT groups, although the values in both groups were significantly different as compared with those in the SO group at 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively. N.S. indicates no difference. * indicates P < 0.05

FBG Levels

There was no difference in the FBG levels among the groups before surgery (Fig. 4). Compared with the SO group, the NDJB and NDJBT groups exhibited a significant reduction in the FBG levels after duodenal exclusion at 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively. However, there was no significant difference in the FBG levels between the NDJB and NDJBT groups.

Fig. 4
figure 4

FBG levels. No difference in the FBG levels was noted among the three groups before surgery. The FBG levels in the NDJB and NDJBT groups were lower than those in the SO group at 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively. N.S., no difference. *P < 0.05

Serum GLP-1 Levels

There was no difference in the fasting serum GLP-1 levels before and 2 weeks after surgery. Compared with the levels in the SO group, higher GLP-1 levels were observed after overnight fasting in the NDJB and NDJBT groups at 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively (Fig. 5). However, there was no significant difference between the NDJB and NDJBT groups.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Serum GLP-1 levels. There was no difference in the fasting serum GLP-1 levels before and 2 weeks after surgery. The GLP-1 levels of rats in the NDJB and NDJBT groups were higher than those in the SO group at 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively. N.S., no difference. *P < 0.05

Radiography of the Abdomen

The occurrence of contrast agent duodenal reflux was easily detected in the NDJB group but not in the NDJBT group (Fig. 6). In particular, duodenal reflux was detected in two rats in the NDJBT group, as compared with eight rats in the NDJB group; the difference was significant (P < 0.05).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Radiography of the abdomen. a Plain film radiography scan after NDJB. The film shows contrast agent reflux in the duodenum in the region denoted by the arrow. b Plain film radiography scan after NDJBT. No duodenal reflux was noted at the region denoted by the arrow

Intestinal Histology

Histologic examination was performed at 8 weeks postoperatively. Adaptive changes after NDJBT were observed in the excluded duodenum segments. Under a microscope (staining with hematoxylin and eosin, × 100), the villus and crypt were both found to be significantly atrophied in the biliopancreatic limb after NDJBT, as compared with that in the SO group (Fig. 7). Although the length of the villus and crypt in the NDJB group was shorter than that in the SO group, the difference was not significant.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Intestinal histology (hematoxylin and eosin, × 100). a Micrograph of a representative section of the biliopancreatic limb in the NDJBT group. b Micrograph of a representative section of the biliopancreatic limb in the NDJB group. c Micrographs of representative sections of the biliopancreatic limb in the SO group. d The villus height was significantly shorter in the NDJBT group than in the SO and NDJB groups. e Crypt depth was significantly greater in the NDJBT group than in the SO group. N.S., no difference. *P < 0.05

Discussion

Duodenal-jejunal bypass (DJB), which is reportedly effective for resolving diabetes and does not require a change in the normal physiological structure and capacity of the stomach, is used to assess the effect of the duodenum and proximal jejunum in the treatment of diabetes. Several studies indicate that the duodenum and proximal jejunum does play a key role in the anti-diabetic effect [13, 14]. In the present study, NDJBT was newly derived from DJB and involved the exclusion of the duodenum along with the placement of a silicone tube at the anastomosis site of the duodenum and jejunum. The tube effectively prevented the reflux of the intestinal contents into the duodenum, as proven via contrast agent gavage. Moreover, we found that the intestinal mucosa of the biliopancreatic limb after NDJBT had a shorter villus length and depth as compared with that after SO. As there was no stimulation by food for a long duration, the intestinal mucosa of the biliopancreatic limb had atrophied after NDJBT. Compared with the SO group, there was a significant difference in the OGTT and GLP-1 values after NDJBT and NDJB, independent of weight and food intake. The OGTT value in the NDJBT group was slightly better improved as compared with that in the NDJB group, which can be explained by the lack of reflux. Thus, the present study shows that duodenal reflux influences the anti-diabetic effects, as supported by the lower AUCOGTT values and FBG levels in NDJBT group. The NDJBT and NDJB groups did not show any significant difference in serum GLP-1 levels, as the same length of the biliopancreatic limb was excluded and the same length of the common limb was retained.

The use of metabolic surgery by experts and scholars has gradually become more widespread over the last 60 years [9]. The mechanisms underlying metabolic surgery have been extensively studied, and the foregut and the hindgut hypotheses are primarily reported [14,15,16]. In 2003, Rubino et al. suggested that the duodenum and proximal jejunum played an important role in weight-loss surgery and hypothesized that diabetes may be a small intestinal disease [17]. Exclusion of the proximal intestine could relieve the symptoms of diabetes and this effect disappeared after the physiological structure was restored. Several studies assessed DJB, and found that bypassing the duodenum and jejunum can improve glucose homeostasis, independent of weight loss [14, 18, 19]. Moreover, research has shown that food can stimulate the proximal intestine, duodenum, and jejunum to produce an inhibitor to glucose metabolism [20]. In a previous study, Jun et al. suggested that the exclusion of the duodenum alone is sufficient to reduce the FBG levels in non-obese diabetic Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rats [21]. Furthermore, the study of Bin et al. showed that the BG levels of these rats were significantly reduced after duodenal bypass liner (DBL) implantation for duodenal isolation. The success of DBL implantation in the treatment of T2DM supports the hypothesis that bypassing the duodenum, which could avoid contact with food, prevents detrimental metabolic effects. Thus, the underlying mechanism of glucose regulation may involve a receptor on the duodenal mucosa that can be activated by reflux contents.

GLP-1 is mainly secreted by L cells of the small intestine. The increase in GLP-1 levels is thought to be induced by the rapid delivery of undigested nutrients to the distal bowel after ileal transposition (IT) [22, 23]. The blend time of pancreatic juices and food directly affects the digestion and absorption of nutrients [24], whereas the undigested food stimulates the secretion of GLP-1 via premature contact with the distal small intestine, followed by blood glucose regulation [25]. The changes in the GLP-1 levels in the present study can be explained by excluding the foregut and shortening the hindgut [26]. The role of GLP-1 in improving insulin sensitivity has been previously confirmed [27, 28], and GLP-1 receptor agonists have been used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes [29, 30].

The present study has certain limitations. First, this experimental study of rats differs from that of humans due to the biological diversity. Hence, the results cannot be directly extrapolated to humans. Second, we did not detect any insulin resistance hormones. Moreover, the tube in NDJBT may not only prevent duodenal reflux, but may also decrease the level of pancreatic juice, which could affect the pH of the intestinal tract and result in a change in the intestinal microflora. Several studies have found that intestinal flora, pH, and bile acid enterohepatic circulation are related [31, 32], and hence, these factors should be studied further. However, in the present study, we could not measure the extent of the reflux and gastric pH due to certain experimental limits.

Conclusions

Thus, we found that the exclusion of the duodenum alone can effectively improve glucose metabolism in T2DM rats, and the placement of a polyethylene tube can prevent reflux, which could further enhance the remission effect of hyperglycemia. Our study showed that duodenal reflux could represent a potential mechanism of T2DM.