Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to investigate and document the characteristic electron microscopic features of the oocyst of Adelina melolonthae, a coccidian pathogen of the European cockchafer, Melolontha melolontha (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).
Methods
Larvae of M. melolontha were collected at Ordu, Turkey. Each larva was dissected in insect Ringer solution. Adeleid oocysts from the tissue that is suspected to Contain coccidian infections were examined under a light microscope (Zeiss), a scanning electron microscope (FEI Quanta 200) and transmission electron Microscope (Philips EM 208).
Results
Spherical to ellipsoidal oocysts measure ca. 24–44.5 µm (mean 35.6 µm) in diameter (n = 50) and include up to twelve sporocysts. The oocyst wall has double layers; the outer layer measured 400–500 nm in thickness and the inner one 10–25 nm. Sporocysts including two sporozoites are rounded ca. 11–12.5 µm (mean 11.7 µm) in diameter. The sporocyst wall consisted of only one 70–80-nm-thick layer. The sporozoites are ellipsoidal and measured 9–11 µm length and 3–4 µm in width. Sporocysts include residual bodies.
Conclusion
In the present paper, the morphology and ultrastructure of the oocyst of A. melolonthae is documented for the first time and compared with other Adelina and coccidian species infecting insects. The results in this study confirm his identification and justify the classification as a separate species A. melolonthae, which differs from other Adelina species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The European cockchafer, Melolontha melolontha (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) L., is one of the most serious insect pest species and causing considerable damage in all countries of Europe, where it is very common [1]. M. melolontha is frequently infected by entomopathogenic organisms [2,3,4,5,6,7]. An infection with the coccid Adelina melolonthae (Apicomplexa/Adeleidae) has been known already for many years [8]. Coccidia are mainly parasites of vertebrates less than 1% of the species infect insects [9]. Species of eight coccidian genera, Adelina, Barrouxia, Chagasella, Legerella, Ithania, Rasajeyna and Ganapatiella, have insects as sole or primary hosts, and all of them are rare and not known well. One of them is the genus Adelina, which exclusively infects insects. It includes several species that are commonly encountered. Members of the genus Adelina infect several insect orders such as Blattaria, Embioptera, Orthoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera and Coleoptera [9]. Most of these insect-infecting Adelina species are transmitted by ingestion of contaminated food.
There is not much information on Adelina melolonthae. After its first description from M. melolontha by Tuzet et al. [8], it was further reported by Kharazi-Pakdel and Amargier [10]. Recently, Yaman et al. [7] recorded this pathogen from the same host in Turkey. Tuzet’s [8] original description of A. melolonthae and all other descriptions of this coccidian pathogen so far are based on light microscopic morphology of the oocyst. In all coccidian parasites infecting insects, the diagnostic stage is the oocyst. In the present paper, the morphology and ultrastructure of the oocyst of A. melolonthae is documented for the first time and compared with other Adelina and coccidian species infecting insects.
Material and Methods
Light Microscopy
Larvae of M. melolontha were collected at Ordu, Turkey. Each larva was dissected in insect Ringer solution. Wet smears of the larvae´s fat body, i.e., the tissue that is suspected to contain coccidian infections, were examined under a light microscope (Zeiss) at a magnification of 200–1000x. When an infection was found, the slides were air-dried and fixed in methanol for 2–5 min. The slides were then washed with distilled water and stained for approximately ten hours in freshly prepared 5% solution of Giemsa stain (stock solution, Carloerba, No. 6B712176C). Afterward, the slides were washed in running tap water, air-dried and re-examined under the microscope. Detected vegetative stages and oocysts were measured and photographed as described in Yaman et al. [11].
Scanning Electron Microscopy
For scanning electron microscopy, tissue samples stored in distilled water were crushed in a drop of water, slightly spread on a cover glass and air-dried. After sputtering with gold in a Baltec SCD 040 sputter coating device, the samples were observed in a FEI Quanta 200 scanning electron microscope.
Transmission Electron Microscopy
Samples for transmission electron microscopy were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 2 h, rinsed in cacodylate buffer, post-fixed in 1% OsO4 for 2 h, and rinsed in cacodylate buffer. After dehydration in an increasing ethanol series, the infected beetles were embedded in Spurr’s resin [12]. Ultra-thin sections were mounted on Pioloform-coated copper grids which were stained with saturated uranyl acetate and Reynolds lead citrate [13]. They were then examined with a Philips EM 208 transmission electron microscope.
Results
A cocccidian infection was observed in the fat body of the host M. melolontha. In all coccidian parasites infecting insects, the diagnostic stage is the oocyst. Members of the family Adelidae are characterized by polysporocystic oocysts, which form several sporocysts within one oocyst. We were able to find such polysporocystic oocysts in the fat body, the typical tissue of adelaide infections (Figs. 1–12). Oocysts are spherical to ellipsoidal (Figs. 2, 3, 10) and measured 35.62 ± 4.04 (23.97–44.56) µm in diameter (n = 50). The oocyst wall has two layers (Figs. 1, 3, 6, 12–14). While the outer wall is considerably thick (Figs. 4, 7–9, 12–14), measuring approximately 400–500 nm, the inner wall is very thin (Figs. 13, 14) measuring only 10–25 nm in thickness. When viewed with SEM microscopy, the outer layer of the oocyst wall is generally smooth (Fig. 10) with some spheroid bodies, which appear in some areas (Figs. 10, 12, 13), while the inner surface of the outer layer is completely smooth (Fig. 9). Oocysts do not contain any residual cytoplasmic bodies (Figs. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 12, 14). The oocysts of A. melolonthae include up to twelve rounded sporocysts (Figs. 1–6, 11, 14), which measured 11.70 ± 0.42 (11.02–12.52) µm in diameter. The thickness of the sporocyst wall was measured from ultra-thin sections and is 70–80 nm (Fig. 14). Within one sporocyst, two sporozoites were observed (Figs. 5, 6). The sporozoites are ellipsoidal and measured 9–11 µm length and 3–4 µm in width. Sporocysts include cytoplasmic residual bodies (Figs. 5, 6). The studied species was identified as Adelina melolonthae.
Discussion
According to Malone and Dhana [14], twelve species belonging to the genus Adelina infect insects. Later, one more species, Adelina grylli, was identified from Gryllus bimaculatus by Butaeva [15]. Additionally, some more adeleid species have been re-recorded and studied [9, 16, 17]. A recent list of insect-infecting Adelina species and their morphological and ultrastructural characteristics is presented in Table 1.
In all coccidian parasites infecting insects the diagnostic stage is the oocyst. The shape and size of the oocysts, the number of sporocysts within an oocyst and the number of sporozoites in a sporocyst are the diagnostic features according to Undeen and Vavra [18]. These features have been used as taxonomic characters for describing species [19]. Five genera of coccidia, Adelina, Chagasella, Legerella, Ithania and Barrouxia, are entirely entomoxenous. Our Adelina isolate contains up to twelve sporocysts in an oocyst and always two sporozoites in a sporocyst. Adelina species may contain different numbers (3–30) of sporocysts within an oocyst but they always have two sporozoites within a sporocyst and thus differ in the sporocyst/oocyst and sporozoite/sporocyst ratios from the genera Chagasella (3 sporocysts / 2 sporozoites), Legerella (0 sporocyst / 15–40 sporozoites), Ithania (1–4 sporocysts / 9–33 sporozoites) and Barrouxia (many sporocysts / 1 sporozoite) [18].
So far, all descriptions on A. melolonthae have been based on the light microscopic morphology of its oocyst [7, 8, 10]. As shown in Table 1, the coccidian pathogen described here shows close similarities with A. melolonthae recorded from M. melolontha by Tuzet et al. [8]. This concerns the shape of oocysts, sporocysts and sporozoites, the number of sporocysts within an oocyst, and the number of sporozoites in a sporocyst. However, there are some minor variations in oocyst and sporocyst size. The oocysts (24–44.6 µm, mean 35.6 µm) recorded in this study are longer than the originally described oocysts (30–35 µm) from M. melolontha by Tuzet et al. [8]. Similar slight differences are present in sporocysts. We measured a diameter of 11–12.5 µm (mean 11.7 µm), while Tuzet’s value is 11 µm.
It is often difficult to compare descriptions of Adelina species because early characterizations were based mainly on light microscopic oocyst morphology. Ultrastructural details are not available for the majority of the Adelina species (Table 1). These restricted methods resulted in an unnecessary creation of new species of Adelina [20]. Also Tuzet’s [8] description of A. melolonthae was completely based on light microscopic morphology. The results in this study confirm his identification and justify the classification as a separate species A. melolonthae, which differs from other Adelina species.
Ultrastructure
In recent identification keys for Adelina species, ultrastructural characteristics (especially of the oocysts) are always included [14, 21, 22]. Until now, fourteen Adelina species infecting insect have been recorded, but in only few of them the oocyst ultrastructure was studied by electron microscopy. Table 1 lists the morphological and ultrastructural characteristics of these Adelina species, and shows that A. melolonthae clearly differs from other Adelina species infecting insects. Our ultrastructural study of A. melolonthae reveals a single-layer sporocyst wall. Different numbers of wall layers of coccidian sporocysts have been reported in the literature [21]. Nyberg and Knapp [23] reported a single-layered wall for Eimeria tenella. Zizka [8] described a three-layered sporocyst wall for Adelina tribolii, Speer et al. [24] a two-layered wall for Isospora canis, Marchiondo et al. [25] and Duszynski et al. [26] a three-to-four-layered wall for Eimeria nieshulzi and E. funduli, respectively. Christie et al. [27] even reported a five-layered wall for Toxoplasma gondii [see 21]. The thickness of coccidian sporocyst walls may also vary. The sporocyst wall of A. melolonthae in this study measured only 70–80 nm. However, Źižka [21] reported 140 to 200 nm thickness of the oocyst wall for A. tribolii and mentioned thicknesses of 70 nm or 110 nm in other coccidian species. Therefore, the description of the oocysts ultrastructure of A. melolonthae provided by this study will be useful for the identification and comparison of other Adelina species infecting insects.
Biological Impact
Several insects play beneficial roles in research, medical and agricultural fields [28, 29]. However, many insect species cause damage to plants in agriculture [30, 31]. Due to the harmful effects of chemical insecticides on the environment [32], different alternative control methods and entomopathogenic organisms are being researched for ecological pest control candidates [6, 33]. Infections caused by coccidians can be summarized in two main groups, namely desirable and undesirable infections. Coccidian parasites mainly infect humans and animals where they are generally undesirable since the infections may have a negative impact on health. However, some coccidian species occur as pathogens in various invertebrates, especially in insects. Infections of pest insects leading to diseases and death are desirable. The use of such pathogens in biological control would be safe for vertebrates and humans since they only infect insect hosts. Pathogens are a natural suppressing factor to increase mortality of insect hosts and may lead to greater sensitivity toward insecticides [18, 34]. Therefore, a correct identification of entomopathogenic pathogens is necessary as a basis for studies on their biological control potential. We have demonstrated that electron microscopy of the dispersive stages, i.e., the oocysts can deliver important information for a unequivocal identification and taxonomy of coccidian species.
Change history
08 April 2021
Table 1 contained a spelling error. This has been corrected."
References
Lodos N (1995) Türkiye Entomolojisi IV. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Yayın No: 493, İzmir
Hurpin B, Robert PH (1972) Comparison of the activity of certain pathogens of the cockchafer Melolontha melolontha in plots of natural meadowland. J Invertebr Pathol 19:291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2011(72)90225-X
Hurpin B, Robert PH (1977) Effects on a natural population of Melolontha melolontha (Col.: Scarabaeidae) of the introduction of Rickettsiella melolonthae and Entomopoxvirus melolonthae. Entomophaga 22:85–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372993
Schweigkofler W (2004) Microbial pathogens of the cockchafer (Melolontha spp.). Laimburg J 2:186–192
Malinowski H (2011) Possibility of forest protection against insects damaging root systems with the use of biological method based on entomopathogenic nematodes and bacteria. Polskie Towarzystwo Lésne, Sylwan 155:104–111
Laznik Z, Vidrih M, Trdan S (2012) The effect of different entomopathogens on white grubs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in an organic hay-producing grassland. Arch Biol Sci Belgrade 64:1235–1246. https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS1204235L
Yaman M, Algı G, Güner BG, Ertürk Ö, Ünal S, Radek R (2016) First record, occurrence and distribution of entomopathogens in populations of the European cockchafer, Melolontha melolontha (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Turkey. North West J Zool 12:192–195
Tuzet O, Vago C, Ormieres R, Robert P (1965) Adelina melolonthae n. sp, coccidie parasite des larves de Melolontha melolontha. Arch Zool Exp Gén 106:513–521
Lange CE, Wittenstein E (2001) An Adelina sp. (Apicomplexa: Coccidia) found in Anurogryllus muticus (De Geer) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J Invertebr Pathol 77:83–84. https://doi.org/10.1006/jipa.2000.4999
Kharazi-Pakdel A, Amargier A (1973) Pathogenesis of simultaneous infections by Adelina melolonthae and Nosema melolonthae for Melolontha melolonthae (in French). Entomophaga 18:229–235
Yaman M, Algı G, Radek R (2019) Morphological, ultrastructural and molecular identification of a new microsporidian pathogen isolated from Crepidodera aurata (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Turk J Zool 43:407–415. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1902-4
Spurr AR (1969) A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. Clin Microbiol Res 3:197–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5320(69)90033-1
Reynolds ES (1963) The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 17:208–212. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.17.1.208
Malone LA, Dhana S (1988) Life cycle and ultrastructure of Adelina tenebrionis (Sporozoea: Adeleidae) from Heteronychus arator (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Parasitol Res 74:201–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00539566
Butaeva FG (1996) Adelina grylli sp. nov. (Apicomplexa: Coccidia: Adeleidae) from Gryllus bimaculatus. Parazitologiya 30:64–69 (UDC: 576.893.192)
Ghosh C, Choudhury A, Misra KK (2000) Life histories of three new coccidian parasites from three coleopteran stored-grain pests of India. Acta Protozool 39:233–240
Petty BM, Johnson DT, Steinkraus DC (2012) Survey of pathogens and parasitoids of Popillia japonica (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in northwest Arkansas. J Invertebr Pathol 111:56–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2012.06.004
Undeen AH, Vávra J (1997) Research methods for entomopathogenic protozoa. In: Lacey L (ed) Manual of techniques in insect pathology, Biological Techniques Series. Academic Press, London, pp 117–151
Lange CE, Lord JC (2012) Protistan entomopathogens. In: Vega FE, Kaya HK (eds) Insect pathology. Academic Press, London, pp 367–394
Malone LA, McIvor CA (1995) DNA probes for two microsporidia, Nosema bombycis and Nosema costelytrae. J Invertebr Pathol 65:269–273. https://doi.org/10.1006/jipa.1995.1041
Žižka Z (1985) Ultrastructure of the sporozoite and the sporocyst wall of the coccidian species Adelina tribolii Bhatia, 1937 within the course of an autoinfection. Arch Protistenkd 129:119–126 (PMID: 9645847)
Sokolova YY (1999) Light and electron microscopic observation on life cycle stages of Adelina grylli Butaeva 1996 (Sporozoa, Adeleidae) from the fat body of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Protistol 1:34–42 (Corpus ID: 85910754)
Nyberg PA, Knapp SE (1970) Scanning electron microscopy of Eimeria tenella oocysts. Proc Helm Soc Wash 37:32–36
Speer CA, Hammond DM, Mahrt JL, Roberts WL (1973) Structure of the oocyst and sporocyst walls and excystation of sporozoites of Isospora canis. J Parasitol 59:35–40
Marchiondo AA, Duszynski DW, Speer CA (1978) Fine structure of the oocyst wall of Eimeria nieschulzi. J Protozool 25:434–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1978.tb04165.x
Duszynski DW, Solangi MA, Overstreet RM (1979) A new and unusual eimerian (Protozoa: Eimeriidae) from the liver of the gulf killifish, Fundulus grandis. J Wildl Dis 15:543–552
Christie E, Pappas PW, Dubey JP (1978) Ultrastructure of excystment of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts. J Protozool 25(438):443
Takov DI, Ostoich PV, Tchorbanov AI, Pilarska DK (2020) Order Diptera as a model in the studies of insect immunity: a review. Turk J Zool 44:481–489. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-2006-11
Demirözer O, Pekbey G, Hayat R, Herdoğan A, Acanski J, Milicic M, Uzun A (2020) First contribution on distribution, abundance, and species richness of blowfly species (Diptera) of Isparta province with five new records for the Turkish fauna. Turk J Zool 44:69–79
Kuyulu A, Genç H (2020) Genetic diversity of codling moth Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) populations in Turkey. Turk J Zool 44:462–471. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-2006-4
İnal B, Kandemir İ (2020) DNA barcoding of black cherry aphid Myzus cerasi (Fabricus, 1775) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) populations collected from Prunus avium and Prunus cerasus. Turk J Zool 44:146–155. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1908-9
Arıkan TK, Turan SL (2020) Organochlorine pesticide residues in feathers of four bird species from western part of Turkey. Turk J Zool 44:401–407. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-2005-52
Freitas ACO, Gigliolli AAS, Caleffe RTC, Conte H (2020) Insecticidal effect of diatomaceous earth and dolomite powder against Corn weevil Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky, 1855 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Turk J Zool 44:490–497. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-2005-34
Yaman M (2020) Transmission of Microsporidium sp. between different generations of Crepidopdera aurata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Turk J Zool 44:248–253. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-2003-32
Léger L (1900) Sur la presence d’une Coccidie coelomique chez Olocrates abbreviatus O1. Arch Zool Exp Gén Sér 3(8):1–3
Purrini K (1984) Two new coccidian parasites of the genus Adelina (Adeleidae, Coccidia) parasitizing oribatid mite Nothrus silvestris (Oribatei, Acarina) and springtail Neanura muscorum (Collembola, Apterygota). Arch Protistenkd 128:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9365(84)80032-9
Léger L (1904) Sporozoaires parasites de l’Embia solieri Rambur. Arch Protistenkd 3:356–366
Levine ND (1988) The protozoan phylum Apicomplexa, vol 1 and 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p 357
Yarwood EA (1937) The life cycle of Adelina cryptocerci sp. nov., a coccidian parasite of the roach Cryptocercus punctulatus. Parasitology 29:370–390. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182000024872
Parez C (1899) Sur une coccidie nouvelle, Adelea mesnili n. sp., parasite coelomique d’un Lepidoptaire. C R Soc Biol (Paris) 51:694–696
Weiser J, Beard RL (1959) Adelina sericesthis n. sp., a new coccidian parasite of scarabaeid larvae. J Invertebr Pathol 1:99–106
Schneider A (1875) Contribution à l’histoire des Grégarines des Invertébrés de Paris et de Roscoff. Arch Zool Exp Gen 4:493–604
Sautet J (1930) A propos d’Adelina tenebrionis, coccidie coelomique de Tenebrio molitor. Ann Parasitol Hum Comp 8:582–589
Moroff T (1907) Untersuchungen über Coccidien: I Adelea zonula n sp. Arch Protistenkd 8:17–51
Acknowledgement
The study was financially supported as a research project by the Scientific and Technical Council of Turkey (112O807).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. We certify that this manuscript is original and has not been published and will not be submitted elsewhere for publication while being considered by Acta Parasitologica.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yaman, M., Radek, R. Characteristic Light and Electron Microscopic Features of Adelina melolonthae, a Coccidian Pathogen of the European Cockchafer, Melolontha melolontha (Coleoptera/Scarabaeidae). Acta Parasit. 66, 925–931 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-021-00363-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-021-00363-x