Abstract
Tree canopies influence atmospheric pollutant depositions depending on type, ecosystem characteristics, and local climatic conditions. This study investigated the impact of Pinus sylvestris L. and Picea abies (L.) H. Karst., and a mixture of both, on the chemical composition of precipitation. Three permanent plots within the ICP forest level II monitoring network in Lithuania were selected to illustrate typical hemiboreal coniferous forests. The study analysed (1) the concentrations of NO2, NH3 and SO2 in the ambient air; (2) the concentrations of SO42−, NO3−, NH4+, Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Cl– in throughfall beneath canopies and in precipitation collected in an adjacent field, and (3) S and total N, Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Cl− depositions in throughfall and precipitation over 2006–2022. Results show a significant decrease in SO2 emissions in the ambient air; NO2 and NH3 emissions also decreased. The canopies reduced the acidity of throughfall, although they led to notably higher concentrations of SO42−, NO3−, Na+, and particularly K+. During the study, low variability in NO3– deposition and a decrease in NH4+ deposition occurred. Deposition loads increased by 20–30% when precipitation passed through the canopy. The cumulative deposition of S, Cl, Na, K, Ca, and N was greater under P. abies than under P. sylvestris. However, K deposition in throughfall was considerably lower under P. sylvestris compared to the P. abies or mixed stand. Throughfall S depositions declined across all three coniferous plots. Overall, there was no specific effect of tree species on throughfall chemistry.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The increase in human activities has led to higher emissions of air pollutants in urban areas, with some of these pollutants spreading to distant regions as background pollution (Kopáček et al. 2016). The effects of nitrogen (N) and sulphur (S) deposition on forest ecosystem services and the forest's role in enhancing air quality have been research topics for several decades (Galloway et al. 2008; Aherne and Posch 2013; Posch et al. 2019; Grennfelt et al. 2020; Costa et al. 2022).
Tree canopies have several significant effects on atmospheric depositions. These effects vary depending on pollutant type, ecosystem characteristics (species composition, age, stand density, canopy structure), and local climatic conditions (wind speed and direction, temperature, precipitation, movement of air masses) (Bredemeier 1988; Ponette‐González et al. 2010; Tan et al. 2018). Airborne particles like pollen and fine particulate matter (PM) are captured by canopies as leaves and branches function as natural filters (Hamdan and Schmidt 2012; Corti et al. 2019). Trees also absorb specific gaseous pollutants, among which carbon dioxide (CO2) should be mentioned first because it is directly involved in photosynthesis. Although trees use CO2 for growth, they also absorb gases such as sulphur dioxide (SO2), ozone (O3), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), thereby reducing their concentration in the atmosphere. In open areas, urban settings, and forest environments, distinctions in atmospheric deposition become apparent due to the wind protection afforded by forests or groups of trees. This protection significantly diminishes the dispersion of various substances. Therefore, several studies suggest that forest canopy interception of precipitation is important for reducing atmospheric deposition of pollutants, trace gas fluxes and leaching of solutes (Whelan and Anderson 1996; Kozłowski et al. 2020).
Forest canopies absorb dissolved substances such as NH4+–N and NO3−–N in throughfall (Zhang and Liang 2012; Su et al. 2019). Although some studies have shown that canopies effectively filter trace metals, sulphur, and chlorine from precipitation, throughfall inputs can also change nutrient concentrations in the forest floor and soil (Zhao et al. 2017; Tan et al. 2018). Chemical transformations in air pollutant composition take place within the tree canopy, leading to substantial modifications in the chemical composition of precipitation before it reaches the forest floor, resulting in enrichment or loss of various ions (Germer et al. 2007; Hamdan and Schmidt 2012; Eisalou et al. 2013; Sheng et al. 2022). Two primary processes, the wash-off of dry deposited compounds which accumulate in the canopy between rain events, and ion exchange within the canopy are often highlighted (Žaltauskaitė and Juknys 2009; Tan et al. 2018; Sheng et al. 2022). High to moderate nitrate deposition in throughfall was found in central Europe, including Germany, Czechia, Poland, Austria, Italy, Slovenia and Belgium (Michel et al. 2022). However, high to moderate ammonium throughfall deposition was recorded in the larger area of central Europe than for nitrate. Calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) depositions buffer acidifying effect in soil and high values were reported mainly in central and southern Europe (Michel et al. 2022). According to Schwartz et al. (2022), stands composed of conifers, hardwoods, and mixed species did not influence throughfall depositions.
The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (Air Convention), and the International Co-operative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests (ICP Forests) emphasised the importance of in situ measurements because of the notable local variability in pollutant deposition (Michel et al. 2022). This study aimed to determine if the canopies of coniferous species—Pinus sylvestris L., Picea abies (L.) H. Karst. and a mixture of both—change the chemical composition of precipitation. It was hypothesized that depositions in throughfall may be species dependent. In addition, the objective was to evaluate recent trends in elemental depositions, focusing on both precipitation which refers to rain/snow falling directly to the ground, and throughfall which is a portion of precipitation reaching the ground after interacting with and passing through the tree canopy.
Materials and methods
Study area
The study was carried out in Lithuania where forests cover over 33.8% of the total land area (State Forest Service 2022). Lithuania includes moderate lowlands and highlands with the highest mean elevation of 297.8 m a.s.l. The climate is moderately warm, passing from maritime to continental (Galvonaitė et al. 2013). According to the 1991–2020 climate normal, in Lithuania, the average annual temperature is 7.4 °C, and the average annual precipitation is 695 mm. The hottest month is July, and the coldest January. The highest precipitation of about 800 mm, is recorded in western Lithuania and determined by the proximity of the Baltic Sea and the specific terrain conditions. The highest annual global solar radiation of 3690 MJ m−2 is observed in South-Western Lithuania, while the lowest solar radiation of 3520 MJ m−2 is in south-eastern Lithuania. The dominant forest soils are sandy Arenosols and fertile Luvisols, with Cambisols predominate in agricultural lands (IUSS Working Group WRB 2015; Armolaitis et al. 2022).
Three study plots belonging to the ICP Forest level II monitoring network were selected (Fig. 1, Table 1).
The plots represent typical hemiboreal forests of coniferous stands, covering 56% of the total forest area. The three plots were set up within homogeneous stands, situated at a distance from urban centres, and considered representative of the regional environmental climate. The first study site, coded as a 3 M plot, was in the Kazlų Rūda forest approximately 29 km from Kaunas City (Table 1). This 3 M plot represents a Scots pine (P. sylvestris) stand. The second study site—a 6 M plot—was in the Kaunas district, 17 km from Kaunas centre. It represents a mixed Scots pine and Norway spruce (P. sylvestris and Picea abies) stand. Data for this plot is accessible up to 2017, as observations were discontinued after wind damage in the same year. The third study plot—a 10 M plot—was in the Kretinga forest and represents a pure Norway spruce (Picea abies) forest. This study site was approximately 24 km from Klaipėda City. The forest site type is normally a moisture nutrient poor soil (Nb) in the first study site and temporarily waterlogged fertile soil (Lc) in the second and the third sites according to Lithuanian soil classification (Vaičys et al. 2006).
Sampling and analysis
Concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ammonia (NH3) and sulphur dioxide (SO2) in the atmosphere were determined with passive samplers on all plots from May to October. Two replicates of the passive samplers were exposed 2-m above ground level for 30 d in the open field (Schaub et al. 2016). The tubes were protected from sunlight by opaque cylindrical boxes. The samplers were analysed by PASSAM AG (Switzerland). NO2 and NH3 were determined using the photometric method, and SO2 by ion chromatography.
Atmospheric deposition was sampled following the methodology of the ICP Forests monitoring program (Clarke et al. 2016). Sampling locations were beneath the tree canopy to capture throughfall and in an adjacent open field to collect precipitation across the three permanent plots.
Throughfall and precipitation samples were collected monthly during 2006–2020. Each plot was equipped with 16–18-cm diameter precipitation collectors positioned one meter above the ground. To avoid the impact of direct sunlight and temperature, the collectors were placed in black polyethylene pipes. Collectors damaged by human, animal, or other factors were renewed to ensure accuracy. Precipitation was sampled from three collectors installed in the open field 500 m from the forest plot. Throughfall samples record wet deposition, which involves determining the quantity of pollutants transported by rain and snow. Additionally, throughfall samples include dry deposition from particulate matter accumulating on the canopy. N is directly absorbed by leaves or in the form of organic compounds. The sample containers were transported to the laboratory in special boxes protecting them from light and heat. The precipitation (mm) amount was measured for each sample, avoiding possible contamination. The samples were pooled for chemical analysis for one sample per plot for each sampling period.
Before chemical analyses, throughfall and precipitation samples were stored at 4 °C. Chemical analysis was performed on throughfall and precipitation samples to determine concentrations of various chemical components, including measurements of pH, sulphates (SO42−), nitrates (NO3−), chloride (Cl−), ammonium (NH4+), sodium (Na+), potassium (K+) and calcium (Ca2+) following the methodology of the ICP Forests monitoring program (Clarke et al. 2016). Samples were prepared by filtration with a membrane filter of 0.45 µm. Concentrations of SO42−, NO3−, Cl− and NH4+ in throughfall and precipitation were determined using the IC method (Dionex 2010i, Dionex Corporation, USA). Using ion-selective electrodes, Na+, K+ and Ca2+ concentrations were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS flame).
Statistical analysis
To calculate the amount of depositions, the total quantity of precipitation received within a specific period (mm per month) was multiplied by the concentration of the compound.
For 2006–2022, we analysed data encompassing monthly precipitation and throughfall amounts, concentrations of ions SO42−, SO42−–S, NO3−, NO3−–N, Cl−, NH4+, NH4+–N, Na+, K+ and Ca2+, as well as depositions of N (sum of NO3− and NH4+), S, Na, K, and Ca. The dataset used for this study was complete without missing data.
A non-parametric Mann–Kendall test was applied to investigate annual mean concentrations of elements and to determine the monotonic trend over 2006–2022 at different statistical significance levels (α = 0.001, 0.01 and 0.05). The Theil-Sen approach was applied to estimate the magnitude of the rate of change per year. The non-parametric Mann–Kendall trend test was used to analyse the climatological and hydrological time series due to its simplicity and robustness (Gavrilov et al. 2016). Moreover, this test identifies monotonic trends in a series of environmental data (Pohlert 2023).
Results
Concentrations of sulphur and nitrogen oxides
Changes in concentrations of air pollutants such as NO2, NH3 and SO2 in the open field next to each forest plot were determined. A significant decrease per decade was found for SO2 concentrations (Table 2). However, NO2 and NH3 concentrations showed uneven results. Since the concentrations of these air pollutants were determined in the open field, the composition of tree species did not affect them. Local meteorological conditions and the varying proximity of the urban centre to the study plots possibly influenced the concentrations, leading to an increase in NO2 in the mixed coniferous stand. However, a decrease of N concentrations in P. sylvestris and P. abies stands was identified during the study, although not significant.
Throughfall and precipitation chemistry
The chemical composition of precipitation is strongly influenced by air pollution, and the presence of a forest canopy introduces additional interactions modifying this composition. The average throughfall pH varied among the sites, ranging from pH 5.7 in the P. sylvestris and mixed stands to pH 5.9 in the P. abies stand (Table 3). The average over all sites was pH 5.8. Precipitation pH was 0.1–0.3 points higher than throughfall pH, which ranged between pH 5.9 and 6.0.
The average throughfall SO42− ranged from 2.5 mg L−1 for the P. sylvestris stand to 4.9 mg L−1 in the mixed stand, with an overall average of 3.7 mg L−1 (Table 3). The mean SO42− concentrations were 0.3–2.3 mg L−1 or up to 1.9 times higher than that in precipitation. Average NO3− concentration in throughfall ranged from 5.6 to 10.1 mg L−1 for the P. sylvestris and mixed stands, respectively. In contrast to the mean NO3− concentrations in precipitation, these concentrations were higher, from 1.0 mg L−1 in the P. sylvestris stand to 2.6–5.8 mg L−1 in the P. abies and mixed stands. K+ concentration averages in throughfall ranged from 1.7 to 4.2 mg L−1. On average, they were 2.4–5.6 times higher than that in precipitation.
Mean annual precipitation decreased by − 1.1 mm per decade for throughfall and − 0.6 mm per decade for precipitation for the P. sylvestris stand during 2006–2022 (Table 3). Mean annual precipitation for throughfall increased by 1.8 mm per decade for the P. abies stand. However, precipitation decreased by − 1.7 mm per decade in the P. abies stand during the period. In the mixed P. sylvestris and P. abies stands, average annual precipitation increased in throughfall (6.0 mm per decade) and precipitation (9.6 mm per decade). There were no significant changes in pH during the study period. In the P. sylvestris stand, throughfall depositions of SO42− and SO42−–S decreased significantly by − 0.11 and − 0.03 mg L–1 per decade, respectively. A significant decline was observed in the throughfall depositions of SO42− and SO42−–S in pure P. abies and mixed stands. There was a significant reduction in NH4+ and NH4+–N concentrations in both throughfall and precipitation across all stand types. There was a significant increase in Ca2+ concentrations across all stands. In the P. sylvestris stand, Ca2+ concentrations in throughfall increased at 0.08 mg L−1 per decade, and in precipitation, by 0.12 mg L−1 per decade. However, a significant increase was observed only in precipitation for the P. abies stand, with an increase of 0.12 mg L−1 per decade. A notable increase in Ca2+ concentration in precipitation occurred for the mixed stand of 0.16 mg L−1 per decade.
Throughfall and precipitation depositions
In P. abies (Fig. 2B) and mixed P. abies and P. sylvestris stands (Fig. 2C), the deposition loads in throughfall represented larger fluxes than in precipitation. Differences between deposition loads show that element fluxes increased by 20–30% when precipitation passed through the canopy. However, there were no differences between the throughfall depositions in the pure P. sylvestris stand and precipitation in the open field (Fig. 2A). From the data in Fig. 2, it is apparent that K+ leached in relatively high quantities from the canopies of both pure coniferous stands. The average K+ depositions in throughfall were 1.8–4.4 times higher than precipitation.
When comparing the three study plots, the largest difference between element depositions beneath canopies and the open field was in the mixed stand (Fig. 2C). The highest total depositions were identified in the P. abies stand (Fig. 2B).
During 2006–2022, mean annual throughfall depositions averaged about 4.1–5.9 kg ha−1 of total S, 10.2–25.3 kg ha−1 of Cl−, 6.5–11.8 kg ha−1 of Na+, 8.0–21.7 kg ha−1 of K+, 6.3–7.9 kg ha−1 of Ca2+, and 7.9–11.5 kg ha−1 of total N (NO3−–N + NH4+–N) in all stands (Fig. 2).
Annual mean N deposition in throughfall amounted to 7.9 kg ha−1 (5.8–10.5) in the P. sylvestris stand (Fig. 3A), 8.7 kg ha−1 (5.7–15.6) in the P. abies stand (Fig. 3B), and 11.5 kg ha−1 (9.1–14.1) in the mixed coniferous stand (Fig. 3C). With precipitation, these means were 9.9 kg ha−1, 10.2 kg ha−1 and 8.8 kg ha−1, respectively, for stands of P. sylvestris and P. abies and the mixed stand. In the P. sylvestris stand, N deposition in precipitation exceeded that in the throughfall by 1.3–1.7 times in 2008–2009, 2012, 2016–1017, 2019 and 2021–2022 (Fig. 3A). In the P. abies stand, N deposition in precipitation exceeded deposition in throughfall in 2014–2015, 2017, 2019–2020 and 2022, while no differences were found for the mixed stand.
In throughfall NH4+–N depositions, there was an evident decline from 4.3–7.2 to 0.3–2.0 kg ha−1 for all stands during 2006–2022 (Fig. 4A, B and C). In contrast, throughfall NO3−–N deposition showed either minimal change or an increase throughout the evaluation period (Fig. 4a, b and c). NH4+–N and NO3−–N depositions in precipitation were more comparable for P. sylvestris (R2 = 0.1179 and 0.3924, respectively) and P. abies (R2 = 0.3104 and 0.3606, respectively) than in the corresponding depositions found beneath canopies.
Potassium depositions showed considerable annual variability, revealing distinct trends in K leaching from tree canopies. However, no explicit trends were identified in any stand throughout 2006–2022 (data not shown). Throughfall K depositions ranged from 5.0–11.6 kg ha−1 in the P. sylvestris stand, 13.4–29.0 kg ha−1 in the mixed stand, and 13.1–33.3 kg ha−1 in the P. abies stand.
Across all plots, S depositions decreased during the study period (Fig. 5).
Despite substantial annual variations in S depositions with precipitation, a distinct decreasing trend was observed in throughfall S depositions (Fig. 5). Between 2006 and 2014, S deposition was 5.3 kg ha−1 in the P. sylvestris stand, whereas in the period 2015 and 2022, these depositions were nearly half that amount, totalling an average of 2.8 kg ha−1 (Fig. 5A). In the P. abies stand, throughfall S depositions averaged about 7.4 kg ha−1 in 2008–2014 and 4.6 kg ha−1 in 2015–2022 (Fig. 5B). Within the mixed stand, these values were 6.7 kg ha−1 in 2006–2014 and 3.8 kg ha−1 in 2015–2017 (Fig. 5C). The trend of throughfall S depositions across all three plots showed a decline, with R2 values ranging between 0.5044 and 0.6691 (data not shown).
Throughfall depositions of Ca2+ averaged between 6.3 and 7.9 kg ha−1 (data not shown). Significantly, these were 1.5 to 1.9 times lower than those observed in the open field. Over the study period, there was an increase in throughfall depositions of Ca2+, as indicated by the determination coefficient R2 = 0.394 (y = 0.3403x + 4.4758) for the P. sylvestris stand; R2 = 0.490 (y = 0.4491x + 4.3348) for the P. abies stand, and R2 = 0.569 (y = 0.3669x + 3.9144) for the mixed stand.
In the P. sylvestris stand, Cl– depositions were 10.2 ± 1.3 kg ha−1 in throughfall and 9.5 ± 1.4 kg ha−1 in precipitation; in P. abies stands, these depositions were 25.3 ± 1.3 and 18.4 ± 1.3 kg ha−1, respectively, and in the mixed stands, 13.2 ± 0.7 and 8.5 ± 1.9 kg ha−1, respectively (data not shown). Although Cl− depositions were higher in throughfall than in precipitation in all stands, the highest difference by twice between the values was in the mixed P. sylvestris and P. abies stand. Over the 2006–2022 period, no significant trend in Cl− depositions was observed, as indicated by the determination coefficient R2 < 0.0905 for all stands.
Discussion and conclusions
Reports from the UNECE ICP Forests programme indicated a decline in anthropogenic S emissions in Europe over the past several decades (Michel et al. 2022). Nevertheless, there is a significant concern regarding increased N emissions. European forests have experienced a decrease in N and S depositions in recent years (Erisman et al. 2003; Vuorenmaa et al. 2018; Schmitz et al. 2019). This study found a significant decrease in SO2 concentrations in the ambient air over 2006–2022. Slight decreases were also observed for NO2 and NH3 concentrations (Table 2). Chang et al. (2022) assessed long-term changes in precipitation acidity and the presence of acidifying compounds by analysing data from three networks covering North America, Europe, and East Asia. The findings revealed a trend toward rising pH levels in North America and Europe, attributed to decreased SO2 emissions. In at least these two aspects, the results of the present study showed no significant changes in pH per decade. However, comparable trends were found for changes in SO2 concentrations in ambient air (Table 2) and for SO42− in throughfall and precipitation (Table 3).
Central Europe exhibited high throughfall depositions of NO3−–N and SO42−–S, while the lowest NO3−–N values were detected in Finland and Bulgaria (Michel et al. 2022). Sulphur emissions reduction has decreased the acidity of precipitation, and ammonium compounds have increasingly become more predominant in N deposition (Michel et al. 2022). Over the past few decades, there has been a shift in the NH4+–N/NO3−–N ratio in atmospheric N, as documented by Liu et al. (2013) and Du (2016). NH4+–N/NO3−–N ratios have decreased in Lithuania over the 2006–2022 period. This result is like that found for the Netherlands (Boxman et al. 2008). However, this ratio has increased in most European countries (Kurzyca and Frankowski 2017) and in the United States (Du 2016). Changes in NH4+–N/NO3−–N ratios in ecosystems will most likely lead to changes in plant species richness and productivity (Ren et al. 2021). However, the findings in our study showed relatively low variability in NO3− deposition and a clear downward trend in NH4+ deposition (Fig. 4).
Another result indicated that canopies of coniferous species decreased the acidity of throughfall, yet led to notably higher concentrations of SO42−, NO3−, Na+, and particularly K+. Total deposition loads increased by 20–30% when precipitation passed through the canopy during 2006–2022 period (Fig. 2). The highest total depositions of the elements were for the P. abies stand, while for the P. sylvestris stand, differences between the depositions in throughfall and precipitation compared to the open field were low. However, canopies of both conifer species resulted in increased K in throughfall. Eisalou et al. (2013) showed that forest canopy significantly affected pH, total N and P levels, and SO2, Na and K in the throughfall. Overall K, Ca, Na, and Mg inputs in a forested area were lower than in a non-forested (Tan et al. 2018).
Air pollutants are trapped by tree canopies where primarily N compounds are deposited and washed out by precipitation (Etzold et al. 2020; Ferraretto et al. 2022). Chemical reactions with substances on canopy surfaces, nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO2 + NO) are converted into less harmful forms. Delaria and Cohen (2023) noted that the deposition of NOx had significant implications for the oxidative capacity of the regional troposphere, nitrogen inputs in ecosystems, ozone production, and overall air quality. Research has demonstrated that N assimilated by the canopy acts as a nutrient source for broadleaf species, indicating a potential for long-term accumulation within the ecosystem (Da Ros et al. 2023).
Acidification and eutrophication, the main processes driven by nutrient deposition, significantly impact forest ecosystems (de Vries et al. 2015; Costa et al. 2022). Nitrate (NO3–) and sulfate (SO42−) ions in throughfall are acidifying because they contribute to the acidification of soils and water. However, this study indicated no risk as these ions were unchanged or slightly decreased. This study also found an increase in Ca2+depositions, which suppresses soil acidification. However, as Slootweg et al. (2016) noted, as much as 62% of European ecosystems continued to experience critical eutrophication loads even with the reduction of these quantities.
Research has also demonstrated that nitrogen deposition significantly contributes to the expansion of the carbon sink in forests (de Vries et al. 2014; Du and De Vries 2018; Etzold et al. 2020). This could be considered favourable for climate change mitigation. However, an increased atmospheric N deposition triggers a series of environmental consequences that can adversely affect ecosystems. Changes in soil processes, nutrient imbalances, and changes in vegetation composition are predicted when the annual nitrogen load exceeds 10–20 kg ha−1 for deciduous forests and 5–15 kg ha−1 for coniferous forests (Bobbink et al. 2011). N depositions, on average from 8.8 to 10.2 kg ha−1 in Lithuania during the study period, corresponded to the critical level (Fig. 3).
Essential plant nutrients, such as N, K and Ca, contribute substantially to soil chemistry and are necessary for the growth and development of vegetation. Increased throughfall depositions in forest stands in this study corroborate earlier findings. The ICP Forests Technical Report showed that annual Ca2+depositions were higher than 30 kg ha−1 in the Mediterranean and eastern European regions, while in most of northern Europe, these depositions were below 2 kg ha−1 (Michel et al. 2022). Annual trends in throughfall depositions, especially K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, and NH4+, were significantly impacted by ion canopy exchange (Nordén 1991; Draaijers and Erisman 1995; Chiwa et al. 2004; Tan et al. 2018).
Despite the reduction of air pollutants and depositions in recent years in Lithuania, fixed depositions were close to or within the range of the critical levels for coniferous forests. Both P. sylvestris and P. abies stands resulted in a decrease in throughfall acidity and an increase in concentrations of SO42−, NO3−, Na+, and particularly K+. The total amounts of S and N, Cl−, Na+, K+ and Ca2+ in the P. abies stand exceeded the deposition in the P. sylvestris stand (Fig. 2). While K+ deposition beneath the coniferous canopies exceeded that in the open field due to leaching, leaching of K+ was considerably lower in the P. sylvestris stand compared to the P. abies or mixed stands. During the study period, throughfall S depositions over all plots declined. It may be assumed that P. abies had a greater effect on pollutant removal than P. sylvestris. However, overall, there was no specific effect of tree species on throughfall chemistry, as in all cases, there was an increase in K+ and Cl− depositions passing through the canopy. This also agrees with Schwartz et al. (2022), who reported no influence of species composition on throughfall depositions. However, when explaining changes in atmospheric deposition in Lithuania by relating them to local conditions or the specific species composition of forests, it is appropriate to assess the impact of transboundary air pollution, which, due to prevailing western winds, has a strong negative effect on regional environments. While the impacts of increasing nitrogen depositions on forest ecosystems have been studied for several years, future studies should focus on the recovery mechanisms of forest ecosystems as N and S depositions decline (Schmitz et al. 2019). The results provide assumptions about the ability of these coniferous species to remove pollutants not only in forested areas but also in urban areas.
References
Aherne J, Posch M (2013) Impacts of nitrogen and sulphur deposition on forest ecosystem services in Canada. Curr Opin Env Sust 5(1):108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.02.005
Armolaitis K, Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė I, Žemaitis P, Stakėnas V, Beniušis R, Kulbokas G, Urbaitis G (2022) Evaluation of organic carbon stocks in mineral and organic soils in Lithuania. Soil Use Manage 38(1):355–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12734
Bobbink R, Braun S, Nordin A, Power S, Schütz K, Strengbom J, Weijters M, Tomassen H (2011) Review and revision of empirical critical loads and dose-response relationships. In: Proceedings of an expert workshop, Noordwijkerhout, 2325 National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. Bilthoven Netherlands. https://rivm.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10029/260510/680359002.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y [assessed on 27.01.2024]
Boxman AW, Peters RC, Roelofs JG (2008) Long term changes in atmospheric N and S throughfall deposition and effects on soil solution chemistry in a Scots pine forest in the Netherlands. Environ Pollut 156(3):1252–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.03.017
Bredemeier M (1988) Forest canopy transformation of atmospheric deposition. Water Air Soil Pollut 40:121–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279460
Chang CT, Yang CJ, Huang KH, Huang JC, Lin TC (2022) Changes of precipitation acidity related to sulfur and nitrogen deposition in forests across three continents in north hemisphere over last two decades. Sci Total Environ 806(1):150552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150552
Chiwa M, Crossley A, Sheppard LJ, Sakugawa H, Cape JN (2004) Throughfall chemistry and canopy interactions in a Sitka spruce plantation sprayed with six different simulated polluted mist treatments. Environ Pollut 127:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00259-8
Clarke N, Žlindra D, Ulrich E, Mosello R, Derome J, Derome K, König N, Lövblad G, Draaijers GPJ, Hansen K, Thimonier A, Waldner P (2016) Part XIV: Sampling and analysis of deposition. In: UNECE ICP Forests Programme Co-ordinating Centre (ed.): Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests. Thünen Institute of Forest Ecosystems Eberswalde Germany 32 p. http://www.icpforests.org/Manual.htm [assessed on 24.11.2023]
Corti G, Agnelli A, Cocco S, Cardelli V, Masse J, Courchesne F (2019) Soil affects throughfall and stemflow under Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L.). Geoderma 333:43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.010
Costa DS, Otto J, Chmara I, Bernhardt-Romermann M (2022) Estimating historic N- and S-deposition with publicly available data—an example from central Germany. Environ Pollut 292:118378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118378
Da Ros L, Rodeghiero M, Goodale CL, Trafoier G, Panzacchi P, Giammarchi F, Tonon G, Ventura M (2023) Canopy 15N fertilization increases short-term plant N retention compared to ground fertilization in an oak forest. For Ecol Manag 539:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121001
De Vries W, Du EZ, Butterbach-Bahl K (2014) Short and long-term impacts of nitrogen deposition on carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems. Curr Opin Env Sust 9–10:90–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.09.001
De Vries W, Hettelingh JP, Posch M (2015) The history and current state of critical loads and dynamic modelling assessments. In: de Vries W, Hettelingh JP, Posch M (eds) Critical loads and dynamic risk assessments Environ Pollut 25. Springer, Dordrecht
Delaria ER, Cohen RC (2023) Measurements of atmosphere-biosphere exchange of oxidized nitrogen and implications for the chemistry of atmospheric NOx. Acc Chem Res 56(13):1720–1730. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00090
Draaijers GPJ, Erisman JW (1995) A canopy budget model to assess atmospheric deposition from throughfall measurements. Water, Air Soil Pollut 85:2253–2258. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01186169
Du EZ (2016) Rise and fall of nitrogen deposition in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(26):E3594–E3595. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.160754311
Du EZ, de Vries W (2018) Nitrogen-induced new net primary production and carbon sequestration in global forests. Environ Pollut 242:1476–1487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.041
Eisalou HK, Şengönül K, Gökbulak F, Serengil Y, Uygur B (2013) Effects of forest canopy cover and floor on chemical quality of water in broad leaved and coniferous forests of Istanbul, Turkey. For Ecol Manag 289:371–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.031
Erisman JW, Grennfelt P, Sutton M (2003) The European perspective on nitrogen emission and deposition. Environ Int 29(2–3):311–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00162-9
Etzold S, Ferretti M, Reinds GJ, Solberg S, Gessler A, Waldner P, Schaub M, Simpson D, Benham S, Hansen K, Ingerslev M, Jonard M, Karlsson PE, Lindroos A-J, Marchetto A, Manninger M, Meesenburg H, Merilä P, Nöjd P, Rautio P, Sanders TGM, Seidling W, Skudnik M, Thimonier A, Verstraeten A, Vesterdal L, Vejpustkova M, de Vries W (2020) Nitrogen deposition is the most important environmental driver of growth of pure, even-aged and managed European forests. For Ecol Manag 458:117762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117762
Ferraretto D, Nair R, Shah NW, Reay D, Mencuccini M, Spencer M, Heal KV (2022) Forest canopy nitrogen uptake can supply entire foliar demand. Funct Ecol 36(4):933–949. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14005
Galloway JN, Townsend AR, Erisman JW, Bekunda M, Cai Z, Freney JR, Martinelli LA, Seitzinger SP, Sutton MA (2008) Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320:889–892. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136674
Galvonaitė A, Valiukas D, Kilpys J, Kitrienė Z, Misiūnienė M (2013) Lietuvos klimato atlasas [Lithuanian climate atlas]. Lietuvos hidrometeorologijos tarnyba prie Aplinkos ministerijos [Lithuanian Hydrometeorological Service under the Ministry of Environment]: Vilnius, Lietuva. (In Lithuanian)
Gavrilov MB, Tosic I, Markovic SB, Unkasevic M, Petrovic P (2016) Analysis of annual and seasonal temperature trends using the Mann-Kendall test in Vojvodina. Serbia Időjárás 120(2):183–198
Germer S, Neill C, Krusche AV, Neto SCG, Elsenbeer H (2007) Seasonal and within-event dynamics of rainfall and throughfall chemistry in an open tropical rainforest in Rondonia Brazil. Biogeochemistry 86:155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-007-9152-9
Grennfelt P, Engleryd A, Forsius M, Hov Ø, Rodhe H, Cowling E (2020) Acid rain and air pollution: 50 years of progress in environmental science and policy. Ambio 49(4):849–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01244-4
Hamdan K, Schmidt M (2012) The influence of bigleaf maple on chemical properties of throughfall, stemflow, and forest floor in coniferous forest in the Pacific Northwest. Can J for Res 42(5):868–878. https://doi.org/10.1139/x2012-042
IUSS Working Group WRB (2015) World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014 update 2015 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No 106 FAO Rome
Kopáček J, Hejzlar J, Krám P, Oulehle F, Posch M (2016) Effect of industrial dust on precipitation chemistry in the Czech Republic (Central Europe) from 1850 to 2013. Water Res 103:30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.07.017
Kozłowski R, Kruszyk R, Małek S (2020) The effect of environmental conditions on pollution deposition and canopy leaching in two pine stands (West Pomerania and Świętokrzyskie Mountains, Poland). Forests 11:535. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050535
Kurzyca I, Frankowski M (2017) Recent changes in the oxidized to reduced nitrogen ratio in atmospheric precipitation. Atmos Environ 167:642–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.026
Liu XJ, Zhang Y, Han WX, Tang AH, Shen JL, Cui ZL, Vitousek P, Erisman JW, Goulding K, Christie P, Fangmeier A, Zhang FS (2013) Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature 494(7438):459–462. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11917
Michel AK, Kirchner T, Prescher AK, Schwärzel K (2022) Forest Condition in Europe: The 2022 Assessment. ICP Forests Technical Report under the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (Air Convention). Eberswalde: Thünen Institute https://doi.org/10.3220/ICPTR1656330928000 [assessed on 24.11.2023]
Nordén U (1991) Acid deposition and throughfall fluxes of elements as related to tree species in deciduous forests of South Sweden. Water Air Soil Pollut 60:209–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282624
Pohlert T (2023) Non-parametric trend tests and change-point detection. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/trend/vignettes/trend.pdf [assessed on 24.11.2023]
Ponette-González AG, Weathers KC, Curran LM (2010) Water inputs across a tropical montane landscape in Veracruz, Mexico: synergistic effects of land cover, rain and fog seasonality, and interannual precipitation variability. Glob Chang Biol 16(3):946–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01985.x
Posch M, Aherne J, Moldan F, Evans CD, Forsius M, Larssen T, Helliwell R, Cosby BJ (2019) Dynamic modeling and target loads of sulfur and nitrogen for surface waters in Finland, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Environ Sci Technol 53(9):5062–5070. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06356
Ren ZR, Zhang YQ, Zhang YH (2021) Nitrogen deposition magnifies the positive response of plant community production to precipitation: ammonium to nitrate ratio matters. Environ Pollut 276:116659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116659
Schaub M, Calatayud V, Ferretti M, Brunialti G, Lövblad G, Krause G, Sanz MJ (2016) Part XV: Monitoring of air quality. In: UNECE ICP Forests Programme Co-ordinating Centre (ed.): Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests. Thünen Institute of Forest Ecosystems Eberswalde Germany 11 p
Schmitz A, Sanders TGM, Bolte A, Bussotti F, Dirnböck T, Johnson J, Peñuelas J, Pollastrini M, Prescher AK, Sardans J, Verstraeten A, de Vries W (2019) Responses of forest ecosystems in Europe to decreasing nitrogen deposition. Environ Pollut 244:980–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.101
Schwartz JS, Veeneman A, Kulp MA, Renfro JR (2022) Throughfall deposition chemistry in the great smoky mountains national park: landscape and seasonal effects. Water Air Soil Pollut 233:107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05575-z
Sheng HC, Guo N, Ju CY, Cai TJ (2022) Variation of nutrient fluxes by rainfall redistribution processes in the forest canopy of an urban larch plantation in northeast China. J Forestry Res 33:1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-021-01407-8
Slootweg J, Posch M, Hettelingh JP (2016) Modelling and mapping the impacts of atmospheric deposition of nitrogen and sulphur: CCE Status Report 2015 [The Coordination Centre for Effects, CCE: www.wge-cce.org]. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. The Netherlands, 186 p. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/4038/dokumente/2_cce_sr2015.pdf [assessed 27.01.2024]
State Forest Service (2022) Lithuanian forestry statistics 2021 https://amvmt.lrv.lt/uploads/amvmt/documents/files/Statistika/MiskuStatistika/2021/01%20Misku%20ukio%20statistika%202021_m.pdf [assessed on 24.11.2023]
Su L, Zhao CM, Xu WT, Xie ZQ (2019) Hydrochemical fluxes in bulk precipitation, throughfall, and stemflow in a mixed evergreen and deciduous broadleaved forest. Forests 10:507. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10060507
Tan SY, Zhao HR, Yang WQ, Tan B, Ni XY, Yue K, Zhang Y, Wu FZ (2018) The effect of canopy exchange on input of base cations in a subalpine spruce plantation during the growth season. Sci Rep 8(1):9373. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27675-9
Vaičys M, Karazija S, Kuliešis A, Rutkauskas A (2006) Miškų augavietės. Miško augaviečių ̨tipai. [Forest sites]. Lututė, Kaunas. (In Lithuanian)
Vuorenmaa J, Augustaitis A, Beudert B, Bochenek W, Clarke N, de Wit HA, Dirnböck T, Frey J, Hakola H, Kleemola S, Kobler J, Krám P, Lindroos AJ, Lundin L, Löfgren S, Marchetto A, Pecka T, Schulte-Bisping H, Skotak K, Srybny A, Szpikowski J, Ukonmaanaho L, Váňa M, Åkerblom S, Forsius M (2018) Long-term changes (1990–2015) in the atmospheric deposition and runoff water chemistry of sulphate, inorganic nitrogen and acidity for forested catchments in Europe in relation to changes in emissions and hydrometeorological conditions. Sci Total Environ 625:1129–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.245
Whelan MJ, Anderson JM (1996) Modelling spatial patterns of throughfall and interception loss in a Norway spruce (Picea abies) plantation at the plot scale. J Hydrol 186(1–4):335–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03020-X
Žaltauskaitė J, Juknys R (2009) Throughfall chemistry and canopy interactions in urban and suburban coniferous stands. EREM 4(50):6–12
Zhang SL, Liang CP (2012) Effect of a native forest canopy on rainfall chemistry in China’s Qinling Mountains. Environ Earth Sci 67:1503–1513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1594-2
Zhao HR, Yang WQ, Wu FZ, Tan B (2017) Mixed forest plantations can efficiently filter rainfall deposits of sulfur and chlorine in Western China. Sci Rep 7:41680. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41680
Acknowledgements
This study was conducted as a part of the Valentinas Černiauskas PhD project (2021–2025) and partially within the Long-Term Research Program ‘Sustainable Forestry and Global Changes’ at the Lithuanian Agricultural and Forestry Research Center (LAMMC). Data collection was supported by the ICP Forest Level II network (Lithuania). The authors thank Dalia Jasinevičienė from Centre for Physical Sciences and Technology (Lithuania) for her assistance with the analyses.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com.
Corresponding editor: Tao Xu.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Černiauskas, V., Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, I., Araminienė, V. et al. Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies canopy effects on deposition of air pollutants. J. For. Res. 35, 75 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-024-01728-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-024-01728-4