1 Introduction

Ti-6Al-4V (TC4) is a dual-phase titanium alloy that combines the advantages of both α and β phases, making it widely used in aerospace and marine engineering fields due to its good tissue stability, plasticity, toughness, and high-temperature deformation properties (Ref 1,2,3). Selective laser melting (SLM) can be utilized for integrated and controlled forming of highly complex titanium alloy components, effectively solving the challenges of high energy consumption, long production cycles, low material utilization, and difficulty in forming complex titanium alloy parts (Ref 4, 5). However, during preparation using SLM, rapid heating and transient condensation of the melt pool cause the metallic material to experience repeated thermal expansion and contraction, triggering thermal and phase-change stresses (Ref 6, 7). Coupled with the existence of interstitial debris, qualitative elements (such as O, S), and defects in the powder itself, such as porosity in the titanium alloy powder (Ref 8,9,10,11), it is difficult to avoid the presence of unmelted powder and other metallurgical defects during the forming process. These phenomena affect the forming quality, density, and mechanical properties of titanium alloys to varying degrees.

In recent years, there has been widespread attention to improving the forming quality of additive-manufacturing alloys by doping them with rare-earth elements. The addition of trace amounts of rare-earth elements can effectively enhance the mechanical properties of titanium alloys. Rare-earth elements can combine with oxygen or other alloying elements to form highly stable second-phase particles at high temperatures (Ref 12, 13), which have the ability to refine the β-Ti grains. Yang et al. (Ref 14) found that adding a small amount of CeSi2 to TC4 alloy can remove oxygen (O) and chlorine (Cl) from Ti powder, thereby improving ductility of the alloy. The resulting CeO2 and CeClxOy particles produce a pinning effect at the grain boundaries, which limits the growth of β grains and refines the α-Ti platelets. Li et al. (Ref 15) improved the mechanical properties of as-cast TC4 alloy by adding 0.1 mass% Ce, which increased the tensile strength of the cast TC4 alloy from 787 to 957 MPa and the elongation from 8.8 to 12.3%. Analysis revealed that Ce can absorb harmful elements from the lattice during the alloy-solidification process, by forming uniformly distributed compounds. These compounds introduce more nucleation sites for the cast alloy, refine the β-phase lamellar structure, and further improve alloy strength. Xu et al. (Ref 16) prepared TC4 alloys with a small amount of Ce using a vacuum non-consumable arc furnace. The tensile strength and ductility of a TC4 sample containing 0.5 mass% Ce were significantly improved, which was attributed to the refinement effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles formed in the alloy and the coherent relationship between these nanoparticles and the TC4 matrix.

There is currently limited research on the effect on the properties of SLM-formed TC4 alloy of adding trace amounts of CeO2. This study aimed to investigate the influence of CeO2 content on the microstructure and mechanical properties of SLM-formed TC4 alloys, thereby providing valuable insights for improving SLM-formed defects and optimizing the strength–ductility match of SLM-formed titanium alloys. In addition to its low cost, CeO2 has the following advantages: firstly, it is itself a high-temperature stable second-phase particle, and can increase fluidity of the melt pool, reduce defects in the formed melt track, and decrease crack formation. Wang et al. (Ref 17) found that adding CeO2 to a Ni60 alloy surface laser cladding on aluminum alloy improved the fluidity of the melt pool, enhanced wetting between the cladding layer and substrate, and facilitated escape of gases from the metal melt, thereby reducing defects such as bubbles and cracks in the Ni60 alloy surface. Secondly, under high-energy irradiation from a laser, CeO2 will partially or completely decompose into Ce and O2, the latter of which will then recombine with oxygen in the liquid metal to form CeO2 and Ce2O3. These stable oxide particles become pinned at grain boundaries and phase boundaries, hindering grain growth and achieving refinement. They can also impede dislocation movement in the alloy microstructure and improve alloy strength. When combined with SLM, which is an effective rapid-solidification processing method, rare-earth elements are able to achieve high solubility in titanium alloys due to extremely fast cooling rates. Such a non-equilibrium supersaturated solid solution will decompose and form small uniform rare-earth second-phase particles at certain temperatures (Ref 18,19,20).

2 Materials and Methods

TC4 titanium alloy spherical powder with a particle size of 15-53 μm and chemical composition shown in Table 1, produced by AVIMETAL MET Powder Metallurgy Technology Co., Ltd. (China), was employed. The rare-earth powder used was CeO2 powder with an average particle size of 50 nm, produced by Anhui Xuancheng Jingrui New Materials Co., Ltd. (China). Figure 1(a) and (b) shows particle morphologies of the TC4 titanium alloy and CeO2 powders, respectively. Prior to printing, the TC4 titanium alloy and CeO2 powders were evenly mixed in a mixer (total mixing time of 500 min, with a pause of 10 s every 10 min to reverse rotation). Figure 1(c) shows the TC4 powder with a CeO2 mass fraction of 0.15%. The powders were subsequently vacuum dried at 110 °C for 2 h.

Table 1 Chemical composition of TC4 titanium alloy powder, mass%
Fig. 1
figure 1

Microstructures of (a) TC4 titanium alloy powder; (b) CeO2 powder; (c) TC4-0.15 CeO2 powder; (d) partially enlarged image of (c)

The SLM equipment was model number EP-M150, manufactured by Beijing e Plus 3D Tech Co., Ltd. (China). Argon (purity: 99.99%) was used as the protective gas. The substrate material formed was TA1. To ensure the quality of the formed parts, the laser power and scanning speed should be set within reasonable ranges. Experiments conducted by Wang and Sun (Ref 21, 22) showed that the optimal comprehensive effect on the forming quality of TC4 alloy by SLM is achieved when the laser power is set at 175-250 W and the scanning speed is 850-1150 m/s−1. Considering the limitations of the equipment, the main forming technical parameters were as follows: laser power of 180 W, scanning speed of 1000 mm/s, and layer thickness of 40 μm.

After etching with Kroll reagent, the formed specimens were observed under an optical microscope (OM; BM-12A) and scanning electron microscope (SEM; Zeiss Sigma500) to analyze the influence of CeO2 on the microstructure of SLM-formed TC4. Phase composition of the samples was analyzed using a MiniFlex6 x-ray diffractometer. The microhardness and tensile properties of the specimens were tested using a VH3300 Vickers hardness tester and Zwick Z100 universal testing machine, respectively. A schematic diagram of the sample-stretching process used to manufacture the tensile testing samples is shown in Fig. 2. The equipment uniformly spread the powder from the powder cylinder onto the forming cylinder using a recoater blade to create a predetermined layer thickness. The laser beam focused on the surface of the powder bed through a scanning mirror and melted the powder according to the model slicing path. The stretching sample was built up in a layer-by-layer manner.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Manufacture and configuration of samples used for tensile tests

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 Microstructure Characteristics

Figure 3 and 4 show the crystal phase organization of the TC4 titanium alloy samples prepared by SLM by OM and SEM, respectively. Figure 3(a) shows that the original TC4 sample mainly comprised coarse and elongated columnar crystals with a width of 125-150 μm, which is similar to the observations of Zhang and Kaschel (Ref 23, 24). The SEM image in Fig. 4(a) shows that the original columnar β-Ti crystal structure consisted mainly of Widmanstätten α plates, needle-like α' phase, and certain volume fractions of β phase. A high cooling rate can refine the alloy structure (Ref 25), while the needle-like α' phase mainly originated from transformation of β phase under rapid cooling conditions.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Optical micrographs of microstructures of TC4-xCeO2 alloy specimens: (a) pure TC4; (b) TC4-0.15CeO2; (c) TC4-1CeO2

Fig. 4
figure 4

Scanning electron micrographs of microstructures of TC4-xCeO2 alloy specimens: (a) pure TC4; (b) TC4-0.1CeO2; (c) TC4-0.15CeO2; (d) TC4-0.2CeO2; (e) TC4-1CeO2

As shown in Fig. 4(b), on adding 0.1% CeO2, the grain width slightly decreased, the original Widmanstätten α plates decreased, and there was some fragmentation around the α and β phases, producing a rudimentary mesh-like structure. When the mass fraction of CeO2 increased to 0.15%, the alternating dark and bright phenomena in the macroscopic microstructure became less apparent (Fig. 3b) and the grains became significantly refined. The microstructure is transformed from staggered Widmanstätten α plates to mesh-like α plates (Fig. 4c).

When the mass fraction of CeO2 reached 0.2%, the width of the grains began to increase, the number of coarse α plates significantly increased, and small clusters of bundled structures appeared (Fig. 4d). With addition of 1% CeO2, columnar crystals reappeared, exhibiting an aggregated state (Fig. 3c). The grain size further increased, with the production of lamellar α and β phases, resulting in significant coarsening of the structure (Fig. 4e). Moreover, white particles were observed on the alloy surface: the content was too low to be identified by energy-dispersive spectroscopy, but it is speculated that these were CeO2 particles.

Table 2 shows the length and width dimensions of the α phase of SLM-formed TC4 at room temperature for different mass fractions of CeO2. The dimensions were manually measured using ImageJ image processing software, with fifty α-phase samples randomly selected for each alloy and the average value taken. Combining the data from Figure 3 and 4, it can be observed that as the amount of added CeO2 increased, refinement of the alloy microstructure became more pronounced. TC4-0.15CeO2 exhibited the best refinement, with the width of the α phase decreasing from 1.05 to 0.49 μm; however, when addition of CeO2 exceeded 0.15%, the microstructure began to coarsen and the dimensions of the α phase showed an increasing trend.

Table 2 Average length and average width of TC4-xCeO2 sample α plates

3.2 Phase Composition

Figure 5 shows x-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of SLM-formed TC4, TC4-0.15CeO2, and TC4-1CeO2 alloys. The SLM-formed TC4 primarily comprised α phase. This indicates that the quantity of β phase was relatively small because the diffraction peaks were easily obscured by α-phase diffraction peaks and hence not prominently displayed. CeO2 peaks appear in the XRD spectra of the TC4-0.15CeO2 and TC4-1CeO2 alloys, increasing in intensity to some extent as the CeO2 content increased. When the mass fraction of CeO2 increased to 1%, a Ce2O3 peak appeared in the XRD spectra. This agrees with observations of Liu and Yang (Ref 14, 26). Comparing the diffraction peaks of the three materials, that of TC4-0.15CeO2 was slightly shifted to the right (higher 2θ). The reason for the shift may be due to deviation of the detection system; however, the detailed graph in Figure 5 shows that the overall degree and direction of the diffraction peak shift of TC4-0.15CeO2 are the same. Therefore, it is more likely that CeO2 causes different degrees of lattice distortion in the α and β phases.

Fig. 5
figure 5

X-ray diffraction patterns of TC4-xCeO2 alloys

Bragg’s diffraction equation and the formula for calculating the crystal plane distances of the α and β phases are shown in Equation 1 and 2, respectively (Ref 27, 28). These can be used to explain the shift of the diffraction peaks to the right for TC4-0.15CeO2. In Equation 1, d(hkl) is the interplanar spacing, θ is the diffraction angle, and λ is the x-ray wavelength (a constant). The right shift of the diffraction peaks for the α and β phases indicates that θ increased and d(hkl) decreased. Combined with Equation 2, where a is the lattice constant, and h, k, and l are crystal indices, it is obvious that a decrease in interplanar spacing d(hkl) will cause the lattice constant to decrease. Therefore, as the diffraction peaks shift to the right, the lattice constants of the α and β phases in the alloy decrease, resulting in an increase in the number of grain boundaries and grains with different orientations within a certain volume of the crystal, which leads to grain refinement (Ref 29). This is consistent with the experimental observations of the microstructures.

$$2d\left(hkl\right)\mathrm{sin\theta }=\lambda $$
(1)
$$d\left(hkl\right)=\frac{{\text{a}}}{\sqrt{{h}^{2}+{k}^{2}+{l}^{2}}}$$
(2)

Refinement of the organization may benefit from the growth-inhibition effect of rare-earth elements as solutes. During a solidification process, enrichment/depletion of solutes in the liquid phase at the solid–liquid interface can cause undercooling, leading to formation of new nuclei in the undercooled region. This increases the nucleation rate and hinders growth of previously formed nuclei, thereby refining the grain size. Effective solutes have a high growth-restriction factor Q, which is defined as the rate of development of the undercooled region during the solidification process (Ref 29, 30) and can be calculated using Equation 3.

$$ Q = mC_{0} \left( {k - \, 1} \right) $$
(3)

In the binary phase diagram, m represents the slope of the liquid-phase line (K/mass%); C0 represents the concentration of solute elements (mass%); k is the equilibrium distribution coefficient of solute elements; Q represents the rate of formation of component undercooling caused by solute enrichment/depletion (K). The larger the Q value, the faster is the formation rate, which means that the grain size will be smaller (Ref 31,32,33,34). As shown in Table 3 (Ref 35), adding CeO2 to TC4 can improve the degree of undercooling and refine the grain size.

Table 3 Growth restriction factors (Q values) for solutes in the Ti system

Regarding the effect of solute growth inhibition, some researchers have drawn similar conclusions. Zhang et al. (Ref 36) proposed that the reason for tissue refinement was that CeO2 has a higher Gibbs free energy, which increases the temperature of the solidification interface and accelerates the solidification rate, resulting in a more refined alloy structure. Zhang et al. (Ref 37) added CeO2 during laser cladding of titanium-based composite materials and found that CeO2 decomposed into CeO2 and Ce2O3, which they proposed would be pinned at the grain and phase boundaries, thereby hindering grain growth and achieving refinement. In contrast, the characteristic peak of TC4-1CeO2 showed a slight leftward shift in this work, which may have been due to excessive CeO2 addition, which resulted in an increase in lattice constant and interplanar spacing, ultimately leading to coarsening of the alloy structure. This accords with results reported by Wang and Singla (Ref 38, 39), where excessive CeO2 addition resulted in aggregation, decreased crystallographic matching, and ultimately led to coarsening of the alloy structure.

3.3 Mechanical Properties

Figure 6 shows that the microhardness of the TC4 alloy increased with CeO2 content. Based on the microscopic analyses, when the CeO2 content ranged from 0.1 to 0.2%, microhardness was mainly increased by refining the grain size of the alloy structure with CeO2, thereby increasing the density of grain boundaries, and thus increasing resistance-to-dislocation motion during the deformation process. This ultimately resulted in a slight increase in hardness. Considering the CeO2 contents of 0% to 0.1% and 0.2% to 1%, there was a significant increase in microhardness. At these concentrations, grain refinement had little effect: even when the CeO2 content reached 1%, the grains were in a coarsened state. Based on conclusions of other researchers, the increased hardness observed on addition of rare-earth oxides is not only attributed to refinement of the microstructure, but also to reduction in defects, such as cracks and pores (Ref 40, 41). It is possible that the addition of a larger amount of CeO2 enabled the alloy to achieve better formability: at this level of addition, the alloy has already become brittle, therefore resulting in a significant increase in hardness.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Hardness histogram of TC4 titanium alloy samples with different CeO2 contents

Table 4 and Fig. 7 present tensile test results of the TC4-xCeO2 alloy samples. Compared with the original TC4 alloy, addition of a small amount of CeO2 significantly improved the yield strength and tensile strength, but elongation was severely reduced. When the CeO2 content was 0.2%, both the yield strength and tensile strength began to decline, along with a continuous decrease in alloy elongation. When the CeO2 content reached 1%, the sample experienced brittle fracture when separating the TC4 specimen from the forming substrate using an electrical-discharge wire-cutting machine. This increase in brittleness is consistent with the observation that TC4-1CeO2 exhibited the highest hardness value. Based on the above data, addition of CeO2 should not exceed 0.2% and should be controlled below this level.

Table 4 Tensile properties of TC4-xCeO2 alloys at room temperature
Fig. 7
figure 7

Engineering tensile stress–strain curves of TC4-xCeO2 alloys

Figure 8 shows tensile fracture morphologies of the TC4-xCeO2 alloy specimens. The fracture surface of the TC4-0CeO2 alloy mainly comprised small shallow dimples and indistinct cleavage steps, indicating predominantly ductile fracture. From the enlarged image, it can be observed that the dimples contained some unmelted powder, which is the reason for the lower strength of the TC4-0CeO2 alloy. The fracture morphologies of the TC4-0.1CeO2 and TC4-0.15CeO2 alloys are similar. For these compositions, there was no evidence of unmelted powder in the fracture, the number of dimples decreased compared with the TC4-0CeO2 alloy, and cleavage steps began to appear. A brittle–ductile mixed fracture mode occurred. With increase in the CeO2 content, the number of dimples in the fracture of the TC4-0.2CeO2 alloy significantly decreased, while the number of cleavage steps increased. When the mass fraction of CeO2 reached 1%, dimples in the fracture surface no longer existed, demonstrating occurrence of a brittle fracture.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Fracture morphologies of TC4-xCeO2 alloy specimens: (a) pure TC4; (b) partial enlargement of (a); (c) TC4-0.1CeO2; (d) TC4-0.15CeO2; (e) TC4-0.2CeO2; (f) TC4-1CeO2

Trace amounts of CeO2 are shown to greatly enhance the strength of the alloy, at the expense of sacrificing a certain degree of plasticity. In addition to the fine-crystal strengthening effect of the rare-earth oxide, CeO2 can significantly increase absorption of laser radiation on the surface of the metal powder. Li et al. (Ref 42) suggested that adding nano-sized CeO2 can increase contact between particles and reduce the insulation effect of voids on thermal input, thus increasing thermal conductivity and ultimately improving the laser absorption rate of the cladding layer during laser melting. This greatly improves the challenge of unmelted powder during SLM forming. In addition, CeO2 can be completely or partially decomposed into Ce and O2 under high-energy laser irradiation. The former recombines with oxygen in the liquid metal to form CeO2 and Ce2O3. During this process, a certain number of oxygen atoms are eliminated. Research has shown that elimination of oxygen plays an important role in improving plasticity of the alloy, leading to some recovery in the elongation rate of the TC4-0.15CeO2 alloy. Moreover, as shown in Fig. 1, nano-sized CeO2 powder can adsorb onto TC4 spherical particles during mixing, which increases its effectiveness; however, when the amount of CeO2 is too high, both the tensile strength and plasticity of the samples significantly decrease and hardness increases. This may be because excessive addition of rare-earth oxide causes agglomeration, resulting in uneven dispersion and formation of coarse rare-earth oxide particles in the formed parts, which reduces the beneficial effects of this additive (Ref 43, 44). Therefore, there is scope for improvement in the mixing process used in this study: to effectively control the amount of rare-earth oxide and ensure that it is evenly mixed, a planetary ball mill can be used to achieve more thorough mixing of the rare-earth oxide and metal powders.

4 Conclusion

CeO2 was added at mass fractions of 0.1%, 0.15%, 0.2%, and 1% to TC4 powder, and LSM was used for the formation process to study evolution of the organization and mechanical properties of titanium alloys with different CeO2 contents. The following conclusions were drawn.

  1. 1.

    CeO2 has a significant refining effect on the microstructure of SLM-formed TC4. Of the tested alloys, TC4-0.15CeO2 exhibited the most prominent refining effect, in which the microstructure was transformed from staggered Widmanstätten α plates to mesh-like α plates; however, when the CeO2 content exceeded 0.2%, the alloy structure started to coarsen.

  2. 2.

    XRD analysis showed that the characteristic peak of TC4-0.15CeO2 exhibited a slight right shift, indicating that the lattice constants of α and β phases in the alloy were reduced and the grains were refined. Solute-growth inhibition of CeO2 hindered growth of the originally formed nuclei and CeO2 entered the titanium lattice interstices, causing lattice distortion and crystal surface shrinkage.

  3. 3.

    Addition of CeO2 significantly influenced the mechanical properties of SLM-formed TC4. Addition of CeO2 can increase the hardness of a specimen, but can also damage its plasticity; therefore, the mass fraction of CeO2 should be controlled below 0.2%. The yield strength and tensile strength of TC4-0.15 CeO2 alloy reached 1218 and 1293 MPa, respectively, far exceeding the values for the original specimen; its elongation was also the best of the four CeO2 addition levels examined.