Abstract
Phlomis armeniaca Willd. is a medicinal plant in the Lamiaceae family endemic to Turkey. The present study describes efficient plant regeneration and callus induction protocols for P. armeniaca and compares phenolic profiles, total phenol and flavonoid contents, and free radical scavenging activity of in vitro-derived tissues. Stem node explants from germinated seedlings were cultured on Murashige and Skoog medium (MS) supplemented with 75 plant growth regulator (PGR) combinations. The highest shoot number per explant, frequency of shoot proliferation, and frequency of highly proliferated, green, compact callus were obtained on MS medium containing 0.25 mg L−1 thidiazuron (TDZ) and 0.25 mg L−1 indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). The best root formation was on MS basal medium (control). Methanol extract of leaves obtained from regenerants contained higher total phenol and flavonoid contents than the callus extract. The callus extract showed stronger free radical scavenging activity than leaves with IC50 [concentration inhibiting 50% of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical] values of 4.30 ± 0.08 and 2.21 ± 0.04 mg g−1 dry weight in leaves and callus, respectively. Apigenin, caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, luteolin, rutin hydrate, vanillic acid, ferulic acid, salicylic acid, sinapic acid, and chlorogenic acid were detected by liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization multistage tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) analysis in in vitro-grown leaves and callus tissue. Rutin hydrate, p-coumaric acid, and vanillic acid were found at approximately tenfold higher levels in callus than in leaves. This new micropropagation protocol, the first for P. armeniaca, could be used in industrial production for new herbal tea and germplasm conservation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Different kinds of dried medicinal plant materials have appeared as herbal teas in the supermarkets and are used as natural antioxidants by the food industry. The antioxidant activity of some natural plant extracts is comparable to and sometimes higher than that of synthetic chemical antioxidants (Pokorny 1991). Many natural plant species that contain proteins, carotenoids, ascorbic acid, flavonoids, and other phenolic molecules might play a significant role as physiological and food antioxidants (Shahidi 2000). Natural antioxidants that are obtained from medicinal plants are known to show high levels of biological activities including anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antibacterial, antiallergic, antiaging, anticancer, neuroprotective, and cardioprotective effects (Cook and Samman 1996; Karakas et al. 2015).
Phlomis is a large genus in the Lamiaceae family that comprises about 100 species and encompasses species native to Turkey, North Africa, Europe, and Asia (Demirci et al. 2008). Phlomis species are used to remedy common diseases such as diabetes, gastric ulcers, hemorrhoids, inflammation, and wounds and to protect the liver, kidney, heart, veins, and bone from different pathologies (Limem-Ben Amor et al. 2009). These species have various uses in traditional medicine that differ from one country to another. For instance, P. cephalotes and P. plukenetii are used to treat fever, cough, and cold. P. bovei and P. crinita are utilized to heal burns, lesions, skin infections, and allergies (Limem-Ben Amor et al. 2009).
P. armeniaca Willd. is a medicinal plant in the Lamiaceae family endemic to Turkey. The aerial parts have been used as an herbal tea in traditional medicine for the treatment of inflammation, cold, diabetes, wounds, and gastrointestinal problems such as digestion problems, gastric ulcer, and stomachache (Baytop 1999; Uysal et al. 2016). Antimutagenic (DNA-protecting activity) and antioxidant activities (Yumrutas and Saygıdeger 2012; Sarikurkcu et al. 2015) as well as antibacterial and antitumor activities (Turker and Yıldırım 2013) have also been attributed to aerial parts obtained from natural P. armeniaca. This herbal tea is sometimes consumed daily instead of black tea (Gençay 2007; Dalar and Konczak 2014) in Turkey. The aerial parts of this plant are collected during early summer and used fresh or dried during autumn and winter. Some researchers have demonstrated that P. armeniaca includes glycosidic compounds such as betulalbuside (a monoterpene glycoside), ipolamiide (an iridoid glycoside), and teucrioside (a phenylpropanoid glycoside) (Saracoglu et al. 1995); phenolic compounds such as catechin, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, rutin, rosmarinic acid, and apigenin (Sarikurkcu et al. 2015); and essential oils such as germacrene-D, beta-caryophyllene, caryophyllene oxide, (E)-beta-farnesene, and hexahydrofarnesyl acetone (Yasar et al. 2010).
Despite extensive uses of this endemic medicinal herb and daily consumption of its tea, the in vitro micropropagation of P. armeniaca and the phenolic composition of its tissue culture-derived plant materials have not previously been studied. In vitro micropropagation protocols are useful for plant breeding and commercial production of medicinal endemic plants. Therefore, the objective of this study was to establish an efficient in vitro regeneration and callus formation protocol and to determine the phenolic profiles and antioxidant capacities of P. armeniaca for the first time. Such research would illuminate the components of this plant as well as distribution of these components in various parts of its body and provide an efficient tool for researchers in both basic and applied science.
Materials and Methods
Plant material, surface sterilization of seeds, and culture conditions
P. armeniaca seeds were collected from the natural habitat of Sünnet Lake, Bolu, Turkey, in September 2014. The plant was authenticated by Prof. Dr. Arzu Ucar Turker and an herbarium sample was deposited in the Department of Biology, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu (accession number AUT-1954).
To break seed dormancy, seeds were kept at 4°C for 1 mo. Seeds were soaked in tap water containing 10% (v/v) antibacterial soap (Protex®, Denizli, Turkey) for 24 h and then rinsed with tap water until the foam cleared. To test the effects of bleach concentration on seed germination, surface sterilization was carried out with 10–40% (v/v) commercial bleach (Domestos®, Unilever, Istanbul, Turkey, containing 5% sodium hypochlorite) for 15 min followed by four to five washes with sterile distilled water. The sterilized seeds were placed in sterile Petri plates containing 4.43 g L−1 Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Duchefa Biochemie, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Murashige and Skoog 1962) supplemented with 3% (w/v) sucrose (Merck®, Darmstadt, Germany) and 0.8% (w/v) Bacto agar (Difco®, Bordeaux, France). The medium was adjusted to pH 5.8 before being autoclaved for 20 min at 121°C and 105 kPa. All culture plates were maintained in a plant culture room at 22 ± 2°C with fluorescent light (cool-white light; 200 μmol m−2 s−1, Polylux®, GE Lighting, Nagykanizsa, Hungary), 16-h photoperiod, and 60–65% relative humidity.
Shoot regeneration and callus induction
Two weeks later, germinated seeds were placed into Magenta GA-7 vessels (Sigma-Aldrich® Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) including MS medium supplemented with 0.5 mg L−1 gibberellic acid (GA3) for shoot elongation for an additional 2 wk in the same culture conditions as described above.
Four different explant types (petiole, leaf, root, and stem node) were excised from 1-mo-old sterile seedlings for shoot regeneration and callus induction. The leaf lamina (5 × 5-mm pieces), petiole (4- to 5-mm fragments), node (single node with two axillary buds), and root (4- to 5-mm fragments) explants were transferred to sterile disposable Petri dishes (90 × 15 mm) containing MS medium supplemented with 75 different combinations and concentrations of plant growth regulators (PGRs): thidiazuron (TDZ; 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, or 3.0 mg L−1) and indole-3-butyric acid (IBA; 0, 0.5, 1.0, or 3.0 mg L−1), TDZ (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, or 3.0 mg L−1) and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA; 0, 0.25, 0.5, or 1.0 mg L−1), benzyl adenine (BA; 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0 mg L−1) and naphthalene acetic acid (NAA; 0, 0.25, 0.5, or 1.0 mg L−1), or BA (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 3.0, 5.0, or 10.0 mg L−1) and IAA (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, or 3.0 mg L−1). Filter-sterilized GA3 was added to cooled MS medium after autoclaving. All other used PGRs were added before pH adjustment and then being autoclaved. Shoot regeneration and callus development experiments were repeated three times; each replicate for every treatment contained 3 Petri plates with 6 explants (i.e., each replicate used 18 explants and a total of 54 explants per treatment for the whole experiment). The number of shoots per shooted explant, shoot frequency, and callus formation were recorded 8 wk after culture initiation. A scale of one to four plus (+) signs was used to identify callus formation size [−, no callus development; +, callus development only on edges of explant (Fig. 1 f); ++, callus development 0.5–1.0 cm in diameter (Fig. 1 g); +++, callus development 1.0–1.5 cm in diameter (Fig. 1 h); ++++, callus development 1.5–2.0 cm in diameter (Fig. 1 i)] .
Rooting
For in vitro root induction, the regenerants (5 to 8 cm long) obtained from node explants (Fig. 1 b) were transferred to MS medium supplemented with IAA (0.5, 1.0, and 3.0 mg L−1), IBA (0.5, 1.0, and 3.0 mg L−1), NAA (0.5, 1.0, and 3.0 mg L−1), or 2,4-D (0.05, 0.5, and 1.0 mg L−1), or to MS control medium (without PGRs). All used auxins were added to MS medium before pH adjustment and then being autoclaved. After 5 wk, the number of roots and percentage of the regenerated shoots producing roots were recorded. The rooted shoots were cleaned of medium and transferred to Magenta containers including autoclaved vermiculite (Agrekal®, Antalya, Turkey) and sterile distilled water and maintained in a plant culture room (22 ± 2°C with fluorescent light, 16-h photoperiod, and 60–65% relative humidity). Two weeks later, surviving plantlets were transferred to plastic pots containing commercial soil (Emin Torf, Bolu, Turkey) and vermiculite (3:1 w/w) for acclimatization and growth under growth room conditions (16-h photoperiod, 22 ± 2°C, and 25–35% humidity).
Plant extraction
In vitro-grown leaves and callus of P. armeniaca were collected from 2-mo-old in vitro-cultured plant materials on MS medium containing 0.25 mg L−1 TDZ and 0.25 mg L−1 IAA. The tissues were freeze-dried using a lyophilizer (Christ®, Osterode, Germany) at −55°C and then powdered with a grinder. One gram of the powdered plant material was transferred to a glass test tube containing 10 mL of 80% (v/v) methanol and incubated for 18 h at 35°C in an agitated hot-water bath for extraction. After incubation, the test tubes were centrifuged at 5000 rpm (2795×g) for 10 min. The supernatant was filtered with a Whatman syringe filter (pore size 0.45 μm) and transferred to a new glass test tube. The extracts were stored in a deep-freeze (−80°C) until required for analysis.
Total phenolic determination
The total phenolic content (TPC) was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent according to the procedure reported by Dewanto et al. (2002) with some modifications. Gallic acid (Sigma-Aldrich®) and tannic acid (Sigma-Aldrich®) are accepted standards used as reference phenols. A 125-μL sample from each calibration solution, sample, or blank was placed into a separate cuvette. Then, 500-μL distilled water and 125 μL Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (Merck®, Darmstadt, Germany) were added to each and mixed well. After 5 min, 125 μL of 10% (w/v) sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) solution was added and the final solution was adjusted to 3 mL with distilled water. Then, the solution was shaken very well by vortexing. The solutions were incubated at 22 ± 2°C for 90 min, and the absorbance of each solution was measured at 760 nm using a spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-1900, UV-VIS Spectrophotometer 200 V, Tokyo, Japan). The TPC values of methanol extracts obtained from in vitro-grown leaves and callus were calculated as mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE) and mg tannic acid equivalent (TAE) g−1 dry weight (dw) of plant material according to the calibration curves. The gallic acid and tannic acid calibration curve ranges was 12.5–250 mg L−1 (R 2 = 0.9992 and R 2 = 0.9962, respectively). Experiments were repeated three times for each tested extract with three replicates.
Total flavonoid determination
The total flavonoid content (TFC) of methanol extracts from in vitro-grown leaves and callus of P. armeniaca was determined and measured by an aluminum chloride (AlCl3) colorimetric assay (Chang et al. 2002). Catechol (Sigma-Aldrich®) and quercetin (Sigma-Aldrich®) were used as reference flavonoids. In order to obtain calibration curves of catechol and quercetin solutions at 12.5–250 mg L−1, known concentrations were prepared in 80% methanol. A total of 500 μL of extract solution or standard solution of catechol or quercetin was added to a 10-mL test tube containing 2-mL distilled water. At time 0, 150 μL of 5% (w/v) sodium nitrate (NaNO2) was added to the test tube. After 5 min, 150 μL of 10% (w/v) AlCl3 was added. At 6 min, 1000 μL of 1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was added to the mixture. Immediately, the reaction tube was diluted to a volume of 5 mL with the addition of 1200-μL distilled water and thoroughly mixed. Absorbance of the mixture (three replicates for each extract), pink in color, was determined at 510 nm versus a blank (Chang et al. 2002). The TFC of methanol extracts of in vitro-grown leaves and callus from P. armeniaca was expressed as mg catechol equivalents (CE) and mg quercetin equivalents (QE) g−1 dw of plant material according to the calibration curves (R 2 = 0.9996 and R 2 = 0.9906, respectively). Experiments were repeated three times.
Determination of free radical scavenging activity by DPPH assay
The free radical scavenging activity of methanol extracts from in vitro-grown leaves and callus of P. armeniaca was determined spectrophotometrically against a stable DPPH· (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; Sigma-Aldrich®). The free radical scavenging activity of extracts was measured by slight modifications of the method of Brand-Williams et al. (1995), as described below. The extract solutions were diluted with 80% methanol (to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 mg mL−1) from the stock extract solutions. The solution of DPPH· in 80% (v/v) methanol (1.5 × 10−5 M) was prepared daily. For each sample to be analyzed, 0.5 mL of this solution was mixed with 1.5 mL of extract solution in a 10-cm path-length glass test tube (final mass ratio of extract to DPPH· was approximately 3:1). The samples were kept in the dark for 30 min at 22 ± 2 °C and then the decrease in absorption was measured. Absorption of a blank sample (positive control) containing the same amount of 80% (v/v) methanol and DPPH· solution was measured. The experiment was carried out in triplicate. Quercetin and ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich®) were used as the reference samples. Radical scavenging activity (% inhibition) of in vitro-grown leaves and callus of P. armeniaca was calculated by the formula of Gülçin et al. (2003): %Inhibition = [(AB–AA)/AB] × 100, where AB is the absorption of the blank sample (control) and AA is the absorption of the tested extract solution. The results were also expressed as IC50 (μg mL−1), the amount of sample necessary to decrease the absorbance of DPPH by 50%.
Determination of selected phenolic compounds by LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis
The amounts of 20 selected phenolic compounds, apigenin, caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, gallic acid, genistein (BioChemica®, AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany), kaempferol, luteolin, myricetin, procyanidin-C1, quercetin, rutin hydrate, vanillic acid, ferulic acid, salicylic acid, sinapic acid, chlorogenic acid, hesperidin, naringenin, rosmarinic acid, and isorhamnetin, in methanol extracts of leaves obtained from plantlets and callus of P. armeniaca, were detected using the liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization multistage tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS). All 20 phenolic compounds, except genistein, were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich®. Analysis was performed by METU Central Laboratory, Molecular Biology–Biotechnology Research and Development Center, Mass Spectroscopy Laboratory, Ankara, Turkey, with an Agilent 6460 Triple Quadrupole System (ESI + Agilent Jet Stream) coupled with an Agilent 1200 Series HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). A mobile phase including a mixture of 5 mM ammonium formate +0.05% (v/v) formic acid (solvent A) and methanol (MS grade, Merck) (solvent B) was delivered at a flow rate of 0.3 mL min−1 for 13 min (run time). All analysis conditions were used according to Karakas and Turker (2013).
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis of the experimental data was performed using SPSS Version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Duncan’s multiple range test was used to show statistical differences among means at p < 0.05 (ANOVA).
Results and Discussion
Seed germination
Seed germination (100%) of P. armeniaca was accomplished by using a high concentration of commercial bleach (40%) for the seed surface sterilization in 7 d. In the experiment, different percentages of bleach from low to high doses were used in the seed germination process. Low doses of bleach were not effective to break the seed coat, and seeds were not germinated after 2 mo. On the other hand, the seed coats were separated easily from the seeds treated with a high concentration of bleach (40%), and then all seeds germinated successfully (100%) in MS medium after 5–7 d.
Shoot proliferation and callus induction systems
The number of shoots per shooted explant, shoot frequency, and callus development were recorded 8 wk after shoot culture initiation (Tables 1 and 2).
The success of in vitro propagation depends on the concentration and combination of endogenous plant hormones and exogenous PGRs, composition of the culture medium, culture conditions, genotype, physiological properties of the donor plant, and suitable choice of explant type (Gonçalves and Romano 2013). In the present study, there were significant differences in the effect of different concentrations and combinations of PGRs and the effect of explant type on shoot number and frequency of P. armeniaca (Tables 1 and 2 and Fig. 1 a). The explant type plays an important role in the efficiency of regeneration (Karakas and Turker 2013). In the present study, when petiole, leaf, root, and stem node explants were tested, only stem node explants of P. armeniaca were capable of shoot proliferation (Tables 1 and 2). With stem node explants, the highest number of shoots per explant was obtained on MS medium containing 0.25 mg L−1 TDZ and 0.25 mg L−1 IAA (25.86 ± 4.17 shoots with 100% shoot formation frequency; Table 1 and Fig. 1 b, c). Likewise, the nodal explants of some medicinal plant species were identified as the most suitable explant for axillary shoot multiplication in Galega officinalis (Pehlivan Karakas et al. 2016), Swertia corymbosa (Mahendran and Narmatha Bai 2014), Lavandula spp. (Gonçalves and Romano 2013), and Scutellaria alpina (Grzegorczyk-Karolak et al. 2015).
In the present study, a combination of TDZ and IAA was the most effective for shoot regeneration (Table 1). Huetteman and Preece (1993) and De Gyves et al. (2001) pointed out the success of TDZ in the regulation of adventitious shoot formation, especially in combination with endogenous and some exogenous auxins. Similarly, an induction effect of TDZ in combination with IAA has been shown in many medicinal plant species such as Bellis perennis L. (Karakas and Turker 2013), Cichorium intybus L. (Yucesan et al. 2007), and Achillea millefolium L. (Turker et al. 2009).
When stem node explants were cultured on MS media including BA in combination with NAA or IAA, the best shoot formation was obtained with 5.0 mg L−1 BA in combination with 0.1 mg L−1 IAA (8.06 ± 2.12 shoots with 100% shoot formation) (Table 2). It was clear that the shoot regeneration capacity and frequency of P. armeniaca were related to the levels of IAA. For instance, increasing the level of IAA from 0.1 to 3.0 mg L−1 decreased the shoot number from 8.06 to 1.86 shoots per explant. Likewise, the shoot frequency decreased from 100 to 73.34% (Table 2). Shoot induction was not obtained with petiole, leaf, or root explants on any of the tested media. Shoot and callus development were not observed with nodal explants of P. armeniaca when cytokinins were used alone (Tables 1 and 2). On the other hand, when TDZ or BA was combined with IAA, NAA, or IBA, shoot regeneration was achieved (Tables 1 and 2). Other studies have shown that the presence of auxins is essential for the induction of shoot development, because auxins can regulate/organize cytokinin biosynthesis in plant species (Nordström et al. 2004; Karakas and Turker 2013). However, a critical equilibrium between PGRs provided to the culture medium and endogenous concentration of plant hormones in the explant part is needed (Mallon et al. 2011). The MS control treatment (without PGRs) did not produce any shoots or callus on petiole, leaf, root, or stem node explants (Tables 1 and 2).
Callus tissue formation was observed on all tested explant types of sterile seedlings of P. armeniaca. The efficiency of callus development was evaluated by measuring % callus development, diameter, and color (Tables 1 and 2). The callus had different colors such as green (G), light green (LG), brown (B), and greenish brown (G-B). The best callus development was observed from stem node explants, with 100% callus development frequency, green color, and 2.0-cm diameter on MS medium containing 0.25 mg L−1 TDZ and 0.25 mg L−1 IAA (Table 2 and Fig. 1 i). This callus induction combination was used to produce callus for measurement of antioxidant activity and analysis of the phenolic profile.
Rooting and acclimatization
After 8 wk of culture, 5 to 7 cm long shoots of P. armeniaca were counted, separated, and transferred to rooting MS medium containing various types and levels of auxins (Fig. 1 d). After 5 wk, 90% of the plants survived and rooted only in MS control medium (without PGRs). The plantlets showed moderate survival rates (over 55%; data not shown) (Fig. 1 e).
The present study, being the first report to define an in vitro plant production protocol for P. armeniaca, can provide a method for mass production of pesticide-, herbicide-, and disease-free plants for industrial and pharmaceutical uses.
Estimation of phenolic content of in vitro-propagated leaf and callus obtained from P. armeniaca
The amounts of 20 different phenolic compounds in in vitro-grown leaf and callus methanol extracts obtained from P. armeniaca were calculated by using LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis. The total content of these 20 phenolic compounds in methanol extract of in vitro-propagated leaves (134.4769 μg g−1 dw) was five times higher than in vitro-grown callus (26.5926 μg g−1 dw), both grown on MS medium containing 0.25 mg L−1 TDZ and 0.25 mg L−1 IAA (Table 3). Apigenin, caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, luteolin, rutin hydrate, vanillic acid, ferulic acid, salicylic acid, sinapic acid, and chlorogenic acid were detected in both extracts. The amounts of p-coumaric acid (Fig. 2), rutin hydrate, and vanillic acid were approximately tenfold higher in callus than in leaf (Table 3). Kaempferol, myricetin, naringenin, rosmarinic acid, quercetin, and isorhamnetin were only detected in methanol extract of in vitro-grown leaves (Table 3). The predominant phenolic secondary metabolite in both extracts was chlorogenic acid (121.74 μg g−1 dw in leaf and 22.385 μg g−1 dw in callus; Table 3 and Fig. 3). Sixteen of the 20 phenolic compounds were present at or above the limit of detection (LOD) in at least one of the extract types. The levels of gallic acid, genistein, procyanidin-C1, and hesperidin were lower than the LOD in both tested extracts, and the levels of kaempferol, myricetin, naringenin, rosmarinic acid, quercetin, and isorhamnetin were lower than the LOD in the methanol extract of in vitro-grown callus but could be detected in leaves (Table 3). In the present investigation, the levels of apigenin, luteolin, and chlorogenic acid were higher in the leaves derived from regenerants than in callus. On the other hand, levels of caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid (Fig. 2), rutin hydrate, vanillic acid, ferulic acid, salicylic acid, and sinapic acid were higher in callus than in leaf (Table 3). The presence and accumulation of secondary metabolites is affected by the level of cellular differentiation and cellular organization of the tissue (Verpoorte and Memelink 2002; Mahendran and Narmatha Bai 2014). For that reason, the amount and type of phenolic compounds may vary in tissue-cultured leaf and callus of P. armeniaca. Some researchers have shown that flavonoids such as apigenin, luteolin, naringenin, kaempferol, eriodictyol, and chryseriol are the dominant secondary metabolites isolated from Phlomis species (Limem-Ben Amor et al. 2009). Verbascoside, a phenylethanoid glycoside, was also found in some Phlomis species such as P. crinita (Kabouche et al. 2005), P. carica (Yalcin et al. 2003), P. sintenisii (Calis et al. 2002), P. tuberosa (Ersoz et al. 2001), and P. armeniaca (Saracoglu et al. 1995).
The existence of some phenolic compounds in in vitro-grown plant parts of P. armeniaca can be beneficial as a basis for future studies with the goal of raising the amount of phenolics in in vitro-grown plant parts through the optimization of culture conditions or by applying different stress treatments.
Antioxidant activities of in vitro-cultured leaves and callus of P. armeniaca
The antioxidant activity, TPC, and TFC of in vitro-grown leaves and callus of P. armeniaca are shown in Table 4. These results demonstrated approximately a twofold higher TPC level in methanolic extract of in vitro-grown leaves (66.36 ± 3.01 mg GAE g−1 dw and 76.90 ± 7.02 mg TAE g−1 dw) than in in vitro-grown callus (35.92 ± 2.98 mg GAE g−1 dw and 41.39 ± 3.48 mg TAE g−1 dw) (Table 4). When TFC values were compared, the methanol extract of in vitro-grown leaves contained higher TFC (102.50 ± 3.07 mg CE g−1 dw and 119.44 ± 3.69 mg QE g−1 dw) than of in vitro-grown callus (90.76 ± 1.83 mg CE g−1 dw and 105.35 ± 2.20 mg QE g−1 dw) (Table 4). In vitro-grown leaves of P. armeniaca contained higher TPC and TFC than callus, probably due to a tissue structure associated with their growth and developmental period.
Although the methanol extract of callus had lower TPC and TFC than that of the leaves, it had better antioxidant activity in the DPPH assay (IC50 = 2.21 ± 0.04 μg mL−1) comparable to the positive reference ascorbic acid (IC50 = 2.01 ± 0.04 μg mL−1) (Table 4). The methanol extract of in vitro-grown leaves showed a higher IC50 value (IC50 = 4.30 ± 0.08 μg mL−1) (lower antioxidant activity) than that of callus in the DPPH assay, which means that high total phenolic and/or flavonoid content is not the main reason for the antioxidant activity of the callus methanol extract of P. armeniaca. There was no apparent correlation between TPC, TFC, and antioxidant activity of the methanol extract of in vitro-grown leaves and callus in the present study. Moreover, Babbar et al. (2011) similarly demonstrated that phenolic molecules alone are not completely responsible for the antioxidant activity of plants. Other secondary metabolites such as tocopherols, terpenes, ascorbates, carotenoids, and pigments as well as the synergistic effect among them could possibly contribute to the total antioxidant activity (Fernandes de Oliveira et al. 2012).
Conclusions
The present study generated the first micropropagation protocol for the endemic medicinal plant P. armeniaca, which is consumed as an herbal tea in traditional medicine. A significant effect of 0.25 mg L−1 TDZ + 0.25 mg L−1 IAA was observed in shoot and callus proliferation. This protocol can be beneficial for the conservation of this endemic medicinal plant and for future biochemical, pharmacological, and molecular studies in P. armeniaca. In vitro-propagated plant materials (leaves and callus) of P. armeniaca have a high content of certain pharmaceutical molecules and a high antioxidant activity similar to the positive control ascorbic acid. Therefore, future studies are required to define which phenolic compounds are responsible for the free radical scavenger activity of P. armeniaca, and to evaluate the way in which the phenolic compounds promote high antioxidant activity.
References
Babbar N, Oberoi HS, Uppal DS, Patil RT (2011) Total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of extracts obtained from six important fruit residues. Food Res Intern 44:391–396
Baytop T (1999) Therapy with medicinal plants in Turkey; today and in future (in Turkish). Istanbul University Press, Istanbul
Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C (1995) Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT––Food Sci Technol 28:25–30
Calis I, Kirmizibekmez H, Ersoz T, Saracoglu I, Donmez Ali A, Mitova M, Handjieva N, Popov S (2002) Iridoid, phenylethanoid flavonoid glycosides from Phlomis sintenisii. Turk Acta Pharm Turc 44:195–203
Chang C, Yang M, Wen H, Chern J (2002) Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J Food Drug Anal 10:178–182
Cook NC, Samman S (1996) Flavonoids—chemistry, metabolism, cardioprotective effects, and dietary sources. Nutr Biochem 7:66–76
Dalar A, Konczak I (2014) Cichorium intybus from eastern Anatolia: phenolic composition, antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activities. Ind Crop Prod 60:79–85
De Gyves EM, Sparks CA, Fieldsend AF, Lazzeri PA, Jones HD (2001) High frequency of adventitious shoot regeneration from commercial cultivars of evening primrose (Oenothera spp.) using thidiazuron. Ann Appl Biol 138:329–332
Demirci F, Guven K, Demirci B, Dadandi MY, Baser KHC (2008) Antibacterial activity of two Phlomis essential oils against food pathogens. Food Control 19:1159–1164
Dewanto V, Wu X, Adom KK, Liu RH (2002) Thermal processing enhances the nutritional value of tomatoes by increasing total antioxidant activity. J Agr Food Chem 50:3010–3014
Ersoz T, Ivancheva S, Akbay P, Sticher O, Calis I (2001) Iridoid and phenylethanoid glycosides from Phlomis tuberosa L. Z Naturforsch C 56:695–698
Fernandes de Oliveira AM, Sousa Pinheiro L, Souto Pereira CK, Neves Matias W, Albuquerque Gomes R, Souza Chaves O, Vanderlei de Souza MF, Nóbrega de Almeida R, Simões de Assis T (2012) Total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of some Malvaceae family species. Antioxidants 1:33–43
Gençay A (2007) Cizre (Şırnak)' nin etnobotanik özellikleri. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Van, Turkey
Gonçalves S, Romano A (2013) In vitro culture of lavenders (Lavandula spp.) and the production of secondary metabolites. Biotechnol Adv 31:166–174
Grzegorczyk-Karolak I, Kuzma L, Wysokinska H (2015) The effect of cytokinins on shoot proliferation, secondary metabolite production and antioxidant potential in shoot cultures of Scutellaria alpina. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 122:699–708
Gülçin I, Oktay M, Kireçci E, Küfrevioğlu İÖ (2003) Screening of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of anise (Pimpinella anisum L.) seed extracts. Food Chem 83:371–382
Huetteman CA, Preece JE (1993) Thidiazuron: a potent cytokinin for woody plant tissue culture. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 33:105–119
Kabouche A, Kabouche Z, Seguin E, Tillequin F, Bruneau C (2005) A phenylethanoid glycoside and flavonoids from Phlomis crinita (Cav.) Lamiaceae. Biochem Syst Ecol 33:813–816
Karakas FP, Turker AU (2013) An efficient in vitro regeneration system for Bellis perennis L. and comparison of phenolic contents of field-grown and in vitro-grown leaves by LC-MS/MS. Ind Crop Prod 48:162–170
Karakas FP, Yildirim AB, Bayram R, Yavuz ZP, Gepdiremen A, Turker AU (2015) Antiproliferative activity of some medicinal plants on human breast and hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines and their phenolic contents. Trop J Pharm Res 14:1787–1795
Limem-Ben Amor I, Boubaker J, Ben Sgaier M, Skandrani I, Bhouri W, Neffati A, Kilani S, Bouhlel I, Ghedira K, Chekir-Ghedira L (2009) Phytochemistry and biological activities of Phlomis species. J Ethnopharmacol 125:183–202
Mahendran G, Narmatha Bai V (2014) Micropropagation, antioxidant properties and phytochemical assessment of Swertia corymbosa (Griseb.) Wight ex C. B. Clarke: a medicinal plant. Acta Physiol Plant 36:589–603
Mallon R, Rodriguez-Oubina J, Gonzalez ML (2011) Shoot regeneration from in vitro-derived leaf and root explants of Centaurea ultreiae. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 106:523–530
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Nordström A, Tarkowski P, Tarkowska D, Norbaek R, Åstot C, Dolezal K, Sandberg G (2004) Auxin regulation of cytokinin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a factor of potential importance for auxin–cytokinin-regulated development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:8039–8044
Pehlivan Karakas F, Sahin G, Turker A (2016) Enhancement of direct shoot regeneration and determination of bioactive secondary metabolites in leaves of Galega officinalis L. Turk J Biol (in press). doi:10.3906/biy-1603-70
Pokorny J (1991) Natural antioxidants for food use. Trends Food Sci Technol 2:223–227
Saracoglu I, Inome M, Calis I, Ogihara Y (1995) Studies on constituents with cytotoxic and cytostatic activity of 2 Turkish medicinal-plants Phlomis armeniaca and Scutellaria salviifolia. Biol Pharm Bull 18:1396–1400
Sarikurkcu C, Uren MC, Tepe B, Cengiz M, Kocak MS (2015) Phlomis armeniaca: phenolic compounds, enzyme inhibitory and antioxidant activities. Ind Crop Prod 78:95–101
Shahidi F (2000) Antioxidants in food and food antioxidants. Nahrung 44:158–163
Turker AU, Yıldırım AB (2013) Evaluation of antibacterial and antitumor activities of some Turkish endemic plants. Trop J Pharm Res 12:1003–1010
Turker A, Yucesan B, Gurel E (2009) In vitro regeneration of Achillea millefolium L. from shoot-tips and root segments of seedlings. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 18:61–69
Uysal A, Gunes E, Sarikurkcu C, Celik H, Durak Y, Uren MC (2016) New prospective materials for chemoprevention: three Phlomis. Br J Pharm Res 10(3):1–13
Verpoorte R, Memelink J (2002) Engineering secondary metabolite production in plants. Curr Opin Biotechnol 13:181–187
Yalcin FN, Ersoz T, Akbay P, Calis I, Donmez AA, Sticher O (2003) Iridoid and phenylpropanoid glycosides from Phlomis samia, P. monocephala and P. carica. Turk J Chem 27:295–305
Yasar S, Fakir H, Erbas S (2010) Gas chromatographic (GC-GC/MS) analysis of essential oil of Phlomis armeniaca Willd. from mediterranean region in Turkey. Asian J Chem 22:2887–2890
Yucesan B, Turker AU, Gurel E (2007) TDZ-induced high frequency plant regeneration through multiple shoot formation in witloof chicory (Cichorium intybus L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 91:243–250
Yumrutas O, Saygıdeger SD (2012) Determination of antioxidant and antimutagenic activities of Phlomis armeniaca and Mentha pulegium. J App Pharm Sci 2:36–40
Acknowledgement
This study was supported by grants from the Abant Izzet Baysal University Research Foundation (project no. 2013.03.01.625).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Editor: Rakhi Chaturvedi
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karakas, F.P., Turker, A.U. Improvement of shoot proliferation and comparison of secondary metabolites in shoot and callus cultures of Phlomis armeniaca by LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 52, 608–618 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-016-9792-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-016-9792-3