Abstract
Purpose
The mechanisms underlying the morphological changes in liver cirrhosis remain unknown. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between fibrotic hepatic morphology and portal hemodynamic changes using four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Materials and methods
Overall, 100 patients with suspected liver disease who underwent 3-T MRI were evaluated in this retrospective study. Liver fibrosis was assessed using a combination of visual assessment of the hepatic morphology and quantitative measures, including the fibrosis-4 index and aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio. It was classified into three groups according to the severity of fibrosis as follows: A (normal), B (mild-to-moderate), and C (severe). Quantitative indices, including area (mm2), net flow (mL/s), and average velocity (cm/s), were measured in the right portal vein (RPV) and left portal vein (LPV), and were compared across the groups using the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests.
Results
Among the 100 patients (69.1 ± 12.1 years; 59 men), 45, 35, and 20 were categorized into groups A, B, and C, respectively. The RPV area significantly differed among the groups (from p < 0.001 to p = 0.001), showing a gradual decrease with fibrosis progression. Moreover, the net flow significantly differed between groups A and B and between groups A and C (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), showing a decrease during the early stage of fibrosis. In the LPV, the net flow significantly differed among the groups (from p = 0.001 to p = 0.030), revealing a gradual increase with fibrosis progression.
Conclusion
The atrophy–hypertrophy complex, which is a characteristic imaging finding in advanced cirrhosis, was closely associated with decreased RPV flow in the early stage of fibrosis and a gradual increase in LPV flow across all stages of fibrosis progression.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Chronic liver disease is characterized by progressive fibrosis of the liver parenchyma due to persistent inflammation, damage, and circulatory disturbances, ultimately leading to cirrhosis. Therefore, hepatic fibrosis progression and hemodynamic changes in the portal system are essential prognostic indicators of chronic liver disease [1, 2]. The compensatory stage of cirrhosis shows characteristic selective atrophy and compensatory hypertrophy (i.e., the atrophy–hypertrophy complex) [3,4,5,6]. On histopathological examination, liver fibrosis is associated with reduced circulating blood volume in the sinusoids because of short-circuiting of the microvessels, crushing of portal vein (PV) branches and hepatic veins due to compression by regenerative nodules, and disorganization of the hepatocellular cord-arrangement [7].
Morphological changes in the liver are heterogeneous, with atrophy occurring in the right lobe and hypertrophy in the left and caudate lobes. These morphological changes are related to the anatomy of the PV and hepatic vein, the distribution of hormones, nutritional factors, and inflammatory mediators in the liver [8,9,10,11,12]. Particularly, the uneven distribution of macroscopic blood flow due to anatomical differences between the right portal vein (RPV) and left portal vein (LPV) is assumed to be closely related to changes in the liver morphology in chronic liver disease; however, no studies have confirmed this mechanism.
Although computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can anatomically identify the development of collateral circulation, early portal hemodynamic changes cannot be assessed [13]. Doppler ultrasonography (US) remains the first choice for evaluating blood flow in the PV system. However, it has many limitations, including the inability to observe deep areas and many sites simultaneously, the narrow field-of-view (FOV), the possibility of different measurements depending on the angle, and poor interobserver reproducibility [14,15,16].
Three-dimensional (3D) cine (continuous) phase-contrast MRI, known as four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI, has recently been developed to enable comprehensive and retrospective assessment of the entire upper abdominal hemodynamics by simultaneously and noninvasively acquiring time-resolved flow and anatomical information in a 3D imaging volume [15, 16]. This technology enables visualization of cine (continuous) images reflecting hemodynamics in 3D from any direction, calculating the flow velocity and rate in any cross-section, vector information in blood vessels, and shear stress. In the portal system, several studies on cirrhosis and its complications have been reported, as well as on treatment planning and follow-up for liver surgery and intervention [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30].
This study aimed to clarify the relationship between liver fibrosis-associated hepatic morphology and portal hemodynamic changes, assessed using 4D flow MRI.
Materials and methods
Design and participants
This single-center retrospective study was conducted in accordance with the principles embodied in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kawasaki Medical School (approval number: 3949-01). The requirement for informed consent was waived because of the retrospective study design. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
We evaluated 116 consecutive patients with suspected liver disease who underwent abdominal MRI, including 4D flow MRI at our hospital from November 2019 to May 2021. Sixteen patients were excluded due to poor imaging quality or missing data (n = 10); we further excluded patients with a congenital portal shunt (n = 1), partial hepatectomy (n = 3), PV thrombosis (n = 1), and no blood reports (n = 1). Therefore, 100 patients (69.1 ± 12.1 years; 59 men) were enrolled (Fig. 1).
MRI technique
All MRI examinations were performed with a 3-T scanner using a 32-channel phased-array coil (anterior and posterior coil; Ingenia Elition 3.0 T or Ingenia 3.0 T CX Quasar Dual; Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands); patients fasted for ≥ 3 h before the examination [27]. A 0.1-mL/kg dose of gadoxetic acid (Primovist; Bayer Schering Pharma, Berlin, Germany; 0.025 mmol/kg) was administered during clinical MRI, and portal venous and hepatobiliary phase images were obtained at 70 s and 20 min after contrast material injection, respectively. In the hepatobiliary phase, the imaging parameters for 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo sequences with fat suppression were as follows: repetition time (TR), 4.0 ms; time to echo (TE), 1.43 ms; flip angle, 20°; bandwidth, 1157.4 Hz; parallel imaging factor, 2 (phase) × 1 (slice); FOV, 350 × 295 mm2; voxel size, 1.22 × 1.53 × 5.00 mm3 (reconstructed to 0.68 × 0.68 × 2.50 mm3 with interpolation) without the combination of the k-space shutter; and acquisition time, 18.4 s.
We performed 4D flow MRI with 4D velocity maps acquired using phase-contrast imaging of coronal or coronal-oblique 120-mm slabs. This was tailored to the individual’s anatomy to provide comprehensive coverage of the upper abdominal vessels. The 4D flow MRI parameters were as follows: FOV, 400 × 400 mm2; TR/TE, 5.2–5.3 ms; TE, 3.6–3.7 ms; sensitivity encoding factor, 3.5 (phase × slice = 3.5 × 1.0); flip angle, 10°; voxel size, 1.67 × 2.38 × 4.00 mm3 (reconstructed to 0.83 × 0.83 × 2.00 mm3 with interpolation) without the combination of the k-space shutter; and velocity-encoding sensitivity (VENC), 20 cm/s in all three flow encoding directions (RL-AP-FH). The approximate scan time for 4D Flow MRI was 8–20 min. Images were obtained under free-breathing conditions to minimize respiratory-induced motion artefacts using a navigator-gated approach. Diaphragmatic synchronization was performed with a navigator length of 80 mm positioned on the lung-liver interface, and only data from the middle 6 mm were used. The approximate acceptance ratio was 30–75%. Pulse wave synchronization was used to synchronize the data acquisition with the cardiac cycle; data were retrospectively classified into 10 cardiac time phases. Finally, all three components of the phase-contrast angiogram and velocity vector field were generated using an offline reconstruction.
Image analysis and data collection
To evaluate fibrosis-associated hepatic morphological changes, morphological severity of cirrhosis and clinical data, including the fibrosis-4 (Fib-4) index and aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), were used. MRI assessment was performed using a standard picture archiving and communication system (SYNAPSE; Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). Regarding the grade of the morphological severity of cirrhosis, two fellowship-trained radiologists with 15 and 23 years of experience in abdominal MRI (A.H. and A.Y., respectively), who were blinded to the patients’ clinical data, independently performed the image analyses. Disagreements were adjudicated by a third fellowship-trained radiologist with 16 years of experience in abdominal MRI (A.K.).
The morphological grades of cirrhosis were categorized into group A (no cirrhosis), including those without morphological changes related to cirrhosis (Fig. 2a); group B (mild-to-moderate cirrhosis), including those with enlarged hilar periportal space and/or expanded gallbladder fossa sign and/or right posterior hepatic notch sign (Fig. 2b); and group C (severe cirrhosis), with nodularity of the liver surface and/or visible regenerative nodules combined with an expanded gallbladder fossa sign and/or right posterior hepatic notch sign (Fig. 2c) [5, 6, 12, 31].
The presence of splenomegaly and collateral circulation was recorded. The final fibrosis-associated hepatic morphological grade was determined by adding the threshold values of the Fib-4 index and APRI to the morphological grades of cirrhosis severity [32,33,34,35]. Group A was upgraded to group B if the Fib-4 index was > 1.3 and the APRI was > 0.5, whereas group B was upgraded to group C if the Fib-4 index was > 2.67 and the APRI was > 1. Group B was downgraded to group A if the Fib-4 index was ≤ 1.3 and the APRI was ≤ 0.5, whereas group C was downgraded to group B if the Fib-4 index was ≤ 2.67 and the APRI was ≤ 1.
For the quantitative evaluation of 4D flow MRI, blood flow was analyzed using GTFlow (GyroTools LLC, Zurich, Switzerland). In addition to hemodynamic visualization, the same radiologists (A.H. and A.Y.) manually placed a region of interest in consensus on the cutting planes of the portal trunk (PT), RPV, LPV, superior mesenteric vein (SMV), and splenic vein (SV). To assess the accuracy of the placement of regions of interest on PCA images, we compared the area of PCA with that of contrast-enhanced MR angiography on portal phase images and found a significant correlation in all planes (Spearman’s ρ = 0.888 to 0.966, p < 0.001). Therefore, we manually set up regions of interest in the PCA images. Subsequently, the area (vessel diameter, mm2), forward flow (mL/s), backward flow (mL/s), net flow (mL/s; the difference between forward and backward flows), total flow (mL/s; the sum of forward and backward flows), and average velocity (cm/s) in each cross-section were calculated (Fig. 3). All vessel segmentation was performed manually without using a threshold. Quantitative values were calculated as averages of data obtained using time-varying (time-resolving) PCA, and the approximate analysis time was 5–10 min per case.
Liver volumes were measured using a 3D simulation software (SYNAPSE VINCENT; Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). Briefly, the liver image was semi-automatically extracted from the hepatobiliary phase images. Next, the radiologist (A.H.) manually separated the blood vessels, bile ducts, and perihepatic soft tissues and then determined the right, left, and caudate lobes based on the right hepatic and middle hepatic veins and country lines [36]. Subsequently, the volume (mL) of each region was calculated (Fig. 4). Interobserver reliability was assessed with another radiologist (H.S.) using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. The Spearman's correlation coefficients (ρ) of the right, left, and caudate lobes were 0.959, 0.962, and 0.937, respectively. These results showed an excellent agreement between the observers. Therefore, we used the liver volumes measured by the first radiologist.
Statistical analyses
The Kruskal–Wallis test was performed to assess significant differences in quantitative indices of the PT, RPV, LPV, SMV, and SV, as well as the liver volumes (right, left, and caudate lobes) among the three groups. If significant differences were found, pairwise comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test. The relationship between the right lobe volume and net flow in the RPV, left lobe volume and net flow in the LPV, and caudate lobe volume and net flow in the LPV was assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ). All statistical tests were performed using SPSS Statistics version 24 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), and a two-sided p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Patient characteristics
Overall, 67 patients had chronic liver disease. Of these, 36 and 31 patients did and did not have cirrhosis, respectively. Among patients with cirrhosis, 29, 6, and 1 had Child − Pugh class A, B, and C disease, respectively. Table 1 shows the patient characteristics. Fifteen patients (15%) had no focal liver lesions on MRI. Among the remaining 85 patients (85%), 23, 2, 1, 3, 5, 3, 14, 15, and 19 had hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, dysplastic nodules, hyperplastic nodules, liver abscess, liver cysts, hepatic hemangioma, and metastatic liver tumors (1, pancreatic cancer; 1, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; 1, gallbladder cancer; 1, myxofibrosarcoma; 3, gastrointestinal stromal tumor; 1, adrenal cancer; and 11, colorectal cancer), respectively.
Overall, 45 patients were categorized into group A (no cirrhosis, mean age, 64 [23–92] years; 23 men and 22 women); 35 into group B (mild-to-moderate cirrhosis, mean age, 72 [53–89] years; 23 men and 12 women); and 20 into group C (severe cirrhosis, mean age, 75 [53–91] years; 13 men and seven women) (Table 1).
The percentages of patients with collateral vessels were 0/45 (0%), 3/35 (9%), and 15/20 (75%) in groups A, B, and C, respectively. However, we did not find any shunts to the paraumbilical vein that would increase blood flow in the LPV or to the right adrenal or intercostal veins that would increase blood flow in the RPV.
Quantitative analysis of portal hemodynamics and liver volume
The three groups differed with respect to backward flow and average velocity in the PT; area and average velocity in the SMV; area, total flow, and forward flow in the SV; area, net flow, total flow, forward blood flow, and backward flow in the RPV; net flow, total flow, and forward flow in the LPV; right lobe volume; left lobe volume; and caudate lobe volume (Table 2).
In the PT, the backward flow and average velocity differed between groups A and C and between groups B and C (Table 2). However, in the SMV, the area and average velocity differed between groups A and C and between groups B and C (Table 2). In the SV, area, total flow, and forward flow differed between groups A and C and between groups B and C (Table 2). In the RPV, area, total flow, and forward blood flow differed between groups A and B, between groups A and C, and between groups B and C (Table 2). The net flow differed between groups A and B and between groups A and C. The backward flow differed between groups A and C and between groups B and C (Table 2). In the LPV, net flow differed between groups A and B, between groups A and C, and between groups B and C; total flow and forward flow differed between groups A and B (p = 0.009 and p = 0.01, respectively) and between groups A and C (Table 2).
For liver volume, that of the right lobe differed between groups A and C and between groups B and C. The left lobe volume differed significantly between groups A and B (p = 0.006) and between groups A and C; the caudate lobe volume differed between groups A and C and between groups B and C (Table 2, Fig. 5).
Regarding the correlation of the net flows in the RPV and LPV with liver volumes (right, left, and caudate lobes), the net flow in the RPV positively correlated with the right lobe volume. Similarly, the net flow in the LPV positively correlated with the left lobe and caudate lobe volumes (Fig. 6).
Discussion
In this study, fibrosis-associated hepatic morphological changes were strongly correlated with the indices of portal hemodynamics and liver volume. First, the net flow in the RPV showed a significant positive correlation with right lobe volume. Additionally, the net flow in the LPV showed a significantly positive correlation with the left and caudate lobe volumes. These findings indicate that characteristic imaging findings of advanced cirrhosis, including right lobe atrophy and left and caudate lobe enlargement, may be associated with blood flow changes in the PV.
Second, net flow in the RPV decreased in the early stages of liver fibrosis: area, total flow, and forward flow gradually decreased with fibrosis progression. However, backward flow decreased in the advanced stages of liver fibrosis. In the LPV, forward and total flow increased in the early stages of liver fibrosis: net flow gradually increased with liver fibrosis. These changes contributed to the obstruction of the RPV due to liver fibrosis, leading to a compensatory increase in the blood flow in the LPV. RPV is more likely to be affected by fibrotic obstruction than the LPV, because it bifurcates linearly from the PT and is immediately surrounded by liver parenchyma.
Additionally, the LPV bends and branches from the PT while surrounded by hepatic parenchyma via a long and tortuous path through the falciform ligament [8, 13]. Therefore, the RPV may be more susceptible to increased vascular resistance than the LPV due to liver fibrosis. Consequently, when fibrosis progresses from a mild-to-moderate degree, net flow in the RPV first reduces, followed by right lobe atrophy. However, subsequent compensatory elevation in blood flow in the LPV may lead to left and caudate lobe hypertrophy. The caudate lobe is supplied by both the RPV and LPV, but receives more blood from the LPV. Therefore, the weak correlation of net flow in the LPV with caudate lobe volume (ρ = 0.372) than with left lobe volume (ρ = 0.444) may indicate the influence of double blood supply in the caudate lobe.
Third, as fibrosis progressed, the net flow in the RPV decreased in the early stage, followed by a decrease in the right lobe volume. In contrast, the forward flow in the LPV increased as liver fibrosis progressed, and this occurred almost simultaneously with an increase in the left lobe volume. These results suggest that changes in liver volume were affected more rapidly with increased than with decreased portal blood flow. In patients with severe liver fibrosis, a marked increase in vascular resistance prevents portal blood flow into the liver, resulting in the dilatation of anastomotic branches to the veins and formation of extrahepatic collateral circulation [37]. These collateral pathways are crucial, because they reduce the congestion of the portal blood flow and portal pressure; however, they further cause severe clinical syndromes such as gastrointestinal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, splenomegaly, and hypersplenism [38, 39].
Here, backward flow and average velocity in the PT were decreased in advanced stages of liver fibrosis, as indicated by significant differences between groups A and C and between groups B and C. This occurrence was mainly due to the formation of a gastrorenal shunt that allowed backward flow into the left gastric vein branching from the main trunk of the PV and the development of extrahepatic collateral circulation, reducing the flow into the PV [19, 37]. Several previous studies evaluated the relationship between liver fibrosis and PV hemodynamics with ultrasound (US) and reported that the flow velocity significantly decreased as cirrhosis became more severe [40,41,42]. Although 4D flow MRI tends to observe lower mean flow velocities than the US, both measurements reportedly have a good agreement and an excellent correlation [24, 43, 44]. Our results using 4D flow MRI also showed a significant decrease in portal venous flow velocity with more severe liver fibrosis, consistent with previous studies. Flow measurement using the US is simpler and less expensive than MRI, but 4D flow MRI is advantageous, because it is more objective and reliable since it measures perpendicularly to the vessel and allows retrospective and simultaneous evaluations of multiple vessels with strong repeatability and reproducibility, as well as internal consistency [17, 25, 45, 46]. We speculated that the increase in area and decrease in average velocity in the SMV, in addition to the increase in area, total flow, and forward flow in the SV in advanced stages of liver fibrosis, resulted from the development of collateral circulation, mainly splenic and renal shunts, and hyperdynamic syndrome [19, 37, 47].
In a previous report evaluating hemodynamics in healthy individuals and patients with cirrhosis using 4D flow MRI, patients with cirrhosis exhibited a decreased average velocity in the PT, an increased area, net flow in the LPV and SV, an increased area in the SMV, and a decrease in the average velocity [24]. In patients with cirrhosis, the LPV and RPV areas did not differ, whereas the area of LPV was smaller than that of RPV in healthy individuals. These results are consistent with those of this study. In a previous study, the area and net flow in the RPV were also reduced in patients with cirrhosis, as in this study. However, no significant difference was found between the two groups, possibly due to the smaller sample size (20 patients with cirrhosis vs. 41 healthy patients) than in this study. In summary, the hemodynamic changes in the left and right portal veins associated with cirrhosis and those in the SV and SMV may be due to hyperdynamic syndrome, which is consistent with this study’s results. The novelty of this study, in addition to these results, is that it differentiated between normal, early, and late fibrotic livers and showed that portal hemodynamic and hepatic volume changes occur gradually and are related to the atrophy–hypertrophy complex, which is a characteristic imaging finding in cirrhosis.
This study has some limitations. First, it was a retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional study with a limited number of patients. Second, since we did not have a sub-cohort of sufficient size with histopathological confirmation, changes in fibrosis-associated hepatic morphology were assessed using a combination of visual assessment and quantitative measures. However, imaging techniques, such as MRI, and non-invasive markers, such as the Fib-4 index and APRI, have relatively good accuracy for assessing hepatic fibrosis [1, 37, 47,48,49]. Furthermore, we believe that these assessments are reliable indicators, because compared with the local assessment of a biopsy, they allow the evaluation of the entire liver. Third, this study included various etiologies of chronic liver disease; therefore, the atrophy–hypertrophy complex in the compensatory stage of cirrhosis may vary depending on the etiology. Fourth, we did not evaluate arterial blood flow, because we used VENC targeting the portal system. Because of the hepatic buffer effect, arterial blood flow should increase as portal blood flow decreases, and its distribution may affect the distribution of nutrients from the intestinal tract. The dual-VENC method provides two VENC settings, one for the highest velocity and the other for the lowest velocity, allowing simultaneous acquisitions of high-velocity and low-velocity components of the flow in the same FOV and in a single imaging session [50,51,52]. The data acquired with higher VENC may be used for assessing arterial and those acquired with lower VENC for portal venous velocities, potentially allowing evaluation of hemodynamic changes in the artery and portal vein that could not be investigated in this study. Fifth, we used a relatively low VENC of 20 cm/s to assess portal system hemodynamics. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that the dataset contained cases of velocity aliasing in the highest velocity section. Finally, we did not measure the small hepatic branch of the PV in this study. The atrophy–hypertrophy complex shows atrophy in the right and left medial lobes and compensatory enlargement in the left lateral and caudate lobes [5, 12, 53, 54]. Therefore, these results should be confirmed in future clinical trials with a detailed evaluation, including intrahepatic PV branches and hepatic veins, and many patients stratified by the etiology of chronic liver disease. However, since image voxel size limits vascular evaluation, improved MRI specifications and techniques may be required for branch evaluation.
In conclusion, atrophy of the right lobe of the liver and compensatory hypertrophy of the left and caudate lobes are closely related to blood flow in the portal venous system.
Data availability statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Tsochatzis EA, Bosch J, Burroughs AK. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet. 2014;383:1749–61.
Ge PS, Runyon BA. Treatment of patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:767–77.
Kim RD, Kim JS, Watanabe G, Mohuczy D, Behrns KE. Liver regeneration and the atrophy-hypertrophy complex. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2008;25:92–103.
Djuric-Stefanovic A, Bjelovic M, Stojakov D, Saranovic D, Masulovic D, Markovic B, et al. Education and imaging. Hepatobiliary and pancreatic: atrophy-hypertrophy complex of the liver. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:1180.
Ito K, Mitchell DG, Siegelman ES. Cirrhosis: MR imaging features. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1064-9689(03)00050-3.
Tan KC. Enlargement of the hilar periportal space. Radiology. 2008;248:699–700.
Wisse E, De Zanger RB, Charels K, Van Der Smissen P, McCuskey RS. The liver sieve: considerations concerning the structure and function of endothelial fenestrae, the sinusoidal wall and the space of Disse. Hepatology. 1985;5:683–92.
Ozaki K, Kozaka K, Kosaka Y, Kimura H, Gabata T. Morphometric changes and imaging findings of diffuse liver disease in relation to intrahepatic hemodynamics. Jpn J Radiol. 2020;38:833–52.
Starzl TE, Francavilla A, Halgrimson CG, Francavilla FR, Porter KA, Brown TH, et al. The origin, hormonal nature, and action of hepatotrophic substances in portal venous blood. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1973;137:179–99.
Ozaki K, Matsui O, Kobayashi S, Sanada J, Koda W, Minami T, et al. Selective atrophy of the middle hepatic venous drainage area in hepatitis C-related cirrhotic liver: morphometric study by using multidetector CT. Radiology. 2010;257:705–14.
Yamamoto A, Ito K, Yasokawa K, Kanki A, Tanimoto D, Hayashida M, et al. Morphologic changes in hepatitis virus-related liver cirrhosis: relationship to hemodynamics of portal vein on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. Radiography (Lond). 2021;27:598–604.
Ito K, Mitchell DG, Gabata T, Hussain SM. Expanded gallbladder fossa: simple MR imaging sign of cirrhosis. Radiology. 1999;211:723–6.
Lee WK, Chang SD, Duddalwar VA, Comin JM, Perera W, Lau WF, et al. Imaging assessment of congenital and acquired abnormalities of the portal venous system. Radiographics. 2011;31:905–26.
Rosenthal SJ, Harrison LA, Baxter KG, Wetzel LH, Cox GG, Batnitzky S. Doppler US of helical flow in the portal vein. Radiographics. 1995;15:1103–11.
Oechtering TH, Roberts GS, Panagiotopoulos N, Wieben O, Reeder SB, Roldán-Alzate A. Clinical applications of 4D flow MRI in the portal venous system. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022;21:340–53.
Hyodo R, Takehara Y, Naganawa S. 4D flow MRI in the portal venous system: imaging and analysis methods, and clinical applications. Radiol Med. 2022;127:1181–98.
Roldán-Alzate A, Frydrychowicz A, Niespodzany E, Landgraf BR, Johnson KM, Wieben O, et al. In vivo validation of 4D flow MRI for assessing the hemodynamics of portal hypertension. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37:1100–8.
Stankovic Z, Fink J, Collins JD, Semaan E, Russe MF, Carr JC, et al. K-t GRAPPA-accelerated 4D flow MRI of liver hemodynamics: influence of different acceleration factors on qualitative and quantitative assessment of blood flow. MAGMA. 2015;28:149–59.
Motosugi U, Roldán-Alzate A, Bannas P, Said A, Kelly S, Zea R, et al. Four-dimensional flow MRI as a marker for risk stratification of gastroesophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis. Radiology. 2019;290:101–7.
Keller EJ, Kulik L, Stankovic Z, Lewandowski RJ, Salem R, Carr JC, et al. JOURNAL CLUB: Four-dimensional flow MRI-based splenic flow index for predicting cirrhosis-associated hypersplenism. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:46–54.
Bannas P, Roldán-Alzate A, Johnson KM, Woods MA, Ozkan O, Motosugi U, et al. Longitudinal monitoring of hepatic blood flow before and after TIPS by using 4D-flow MR imaging. Radiology. 2016;281:574–82.
Dyvorne H, Knight-Greenfield A, Jajamovich G, Besa C, Cui Y, Stalder A, et al. Abdominal 4D flow MR imaging in a breath hold: combination of spiral sampling and dynamic compressed sensing for highly accelerated acquisition. Radiology. 2015;275:245–54.
Bane O, Peti S, Wagner M, Hectors S, Dyvorne H, Markl M, et al. Hemodynamic measurements with an abdominal 4D flow MRI sequence with spiral sampling and compressed sensing in patients with chronic liver disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49:994–1005.
Stankovic Z, Csatari Z, Deibert P, Euringer W, Blanke P, Kreisel W, et al. Normal and altered three-dimensional portal venous hemodynamics in patients with liver cirrhosis. Radiology. 2012;262:862–73.
Brunsing RL, Brown D, Almahoud H, Kono Y, Loomba R, Vodkin I, et al. Quantification of the hemodynamic changes of cirrhosis with free-breathing self-navigated MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;53:1410–21.
Hyodo R, Takehara Y, Mizuno T, Ichikawa K, Ogura Y, Naganawa S. Portal vein stenosis following liver transplantation hemodynamically assessed with 4D-flow MRI before and after portal vein stenting. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2021;20:231–5.
Roldán-Alzate A, Campo CA, Mao L, Said A, Wieben O, Reeder SB. Characterization of mesenteric and portal hemodynamics using 4D flow MRI: the effects of meals and diurnal variation. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022;47:2106–14.
Hyodo R, Takehara Y, Mizuno T, Ichikawa K, Ishizu Y, Sugiyama M, et al. Time-resolved 3D cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (4D-flow MRI) can quantitatively assess portosystemic shunt severity and confirm normalization of portal flow after embolization of large portosystemic shunts. Hepatol Res. 2021;51:343–9.
Hyodo R, Takehara Y, Mizuno T, Ichikawa K, Yokoyama S, Ishizu Y, et al. Assessing the complicated venous hemodynamics and therapeutic outcomes of Budd-Chiari syndrome with respiratory-gated 4D flow MR imaging during the expiratory and inspiratory phases. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.ici.2021-0110.
Parekh K, Markl M, Rose M, Schnell S, Popescu A, Rigsby CK. 4D flow MR imaging of the portal venous system: a feasibility study in children. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:832–40.
Kanki A, Tamada T, Higaki A, Noda Y, Tanimoto D, Sato T, et al. Hepatic parenchymal enhancement at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with morphological grading of severity in cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30:356–60.
Shah AG, Lydecker A, Murray K, Tetri BN, Contos MJ, Sanyal AJ, et al. Comparison of noninvasive markers of fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:1104–12.
Shaheen AA, Myers RP. Diagnostic accuracy of the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index for the prediction of hepatitis C-related fibrosis: a systematic review. Hepatology. 2007;46:912–21.
Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, Kalbfleisch JD, Marrero JA, Conjeevaram HS, et al. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003;38:518–26.
Sumida Y, Yoneda M, Hyogo H, Itoh Y, Ono M, Fujii H, et al. Validation of the FIB4 index in a Japanese nonalcoholic fatty liver disease population. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012;12:2.
Couinaud C. Surgical anatomy of the liver revisited. Paris: C. Couinaud; 1989.
Maruyama H, Shiina S. Collaterals in portal hypertension: anatomy and clinical relevance. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021;11:3867–81.
Bosch J, Berzigotti A, Garcia-Pagan JC, Abraldes JG. The management of portal hypertension: rational basis, available treatments and future options. J Hepatol. 2008;48(Suppl 1):S68-92.
de Franchis R, Primignani M. Natural history of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Liver Dis. 2001;5:645–63.
Kondo T, Maruyama H, Sekimoto T, Shimada T, Takahashi M, Okugawa H, et al. Impact of portal hemodynamics on Doppler ultrasonography for predicting decompensation and long-term outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:236–44.
Kayacetin E, Efe D, Doğan C. Portal and splenic hemodynamics in cirrhotic patients: relationship between esophageal variceal bleeding and the severity of hepatic failure. J Gastroenterol. 2004;39:661–7.
Hui R, Li Z, Liu Z, Liu X, Deng H. The clinical value of color Doppler ultrasonography in measuring the hemodynamics of liver cirrhosis patients’ portal and splenic veins. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13:1692–700.
Frydrychowicz A, Roldan-Alzate A, Winslow E, Consigny D, Campo CA, Motosugi U, et al. Comparison of radial 4D Flow-MRI with perivascular ultrasound to quantify blood flow in the abdomen and introduction of a porcine model of pre-hepatic portal hypertension. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:5316–24.
Stankovic Z, Csatari Z, Deibert P, Euringer W, Jung B, Kreisel W, et al. A feasibility study to evaluate splanchnic arterial and venous hemodynamics by flow-sensitive 4D MRI compared with Doppler ultrasound in patients with cirrhosis and controls. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25:669–75.
Stankovic Z, Jung B, Collins J, Russe FM, Carr J, Euringer W, et al. Reproducibility study of four-dimensional flow MRI of arterial and portal venous liver hemodynamics: influence of spatio-temporal resolution. Magn Reson Med. 2014;72:477–84.
Roberts GS, François CJ, Starekova J, Roldan-Alzate A, Weiben O. Non-invasive assessment of mesenteric hemodynamics in patients with suspected chronic mesenteric ischemia using 4D flow MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022;47:1684–98.
Papadopoulos N, Vasileiadi S, Papavdi M, Sveroni E, Antonakaki P, Dellaporta E, et al. Liver fibrosis staging with combination of APRI and FIB-4 scoring systems in chronic hepatitis C as an alternative to transient elastography. Ann Gastroenterol. 2019;32:498–503.
de Oliveira AC, El-Bacha I, Vianna MV, Parise ER. Utility and limitations of APRI and FIB4 to predict staging in a cohort of nonselected outpatients with hepatitis C. Ann Hepatol. 2016;15:326–32.
Ishtiaq A, Shah S, Iftikhar S, Baig-Ansari N, Ashraf H. Relationship of FIB-4 index with transient elastography in chronic hepatitis C patients having APRI ≥ 0.5–≤ 2 in a resource-limited setting in Pakistan. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9:5564–73.
Nakaza M, Matsumoto M, Sekine T, Inoue T, Ando T, Ogawa M, et al. Dual-VENC 4D flow MRI can detect abnormal blood flow in the left atrium that potentially causes thrombosis formation after left upper lobectomy. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022;21:433–43.
Terada M, Takehara Y, Isoda H, Wakayama T, Nozaki A. Technical background for 4D flow MR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022;21:267–77.
Takehara Y, Sekine T, Obata T. Why 4D flow MRI? Real advantages. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022;21:253–6.
Ozaki K, Matsui O, Kobayashi S, Minami T, Kitao A, Gabata T. Morphometric changes in liver cirrhosis: aetiological differences correlated with progression. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20150896.
Awaya H, Mitchell DG, Kamishima T, Holland G, Ito K, Matsumoto T. Cirrhosis: modified caudate-right lobe ratio. Radiology. 2002;224:769–74.
Acknowledgements
This study is funded by research grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 22K15869) and Kawasaki Medical School (number R02B059). The funder had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study conception/study design: AH, YU, and TT. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data, AH, AK, AY, HS, KM, HS, and TT. Drafting the manuscript or revising the manuscript for important intellectual content: AH, AK, AY, and TT. All authors approved the submitted version of the manuscript and agree to be personally accountable for their own contributions and in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even those in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated and resolved and that the resolution is documented in the literature.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Yu Ueda is an employee of Philips Japan Ltd. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Higaki, A., Kanki, A., Yamamoto, A. et al. Liver cirrhosis: relationship between fibrosis-associated hepatic morphological changes and portal hemodynamics using four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging. Jpn J Radiol 41, 625–636 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-023-01388-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-023-01388-0