Abstract
Purpose
We aimed to characterize novel coronavirus infections based on imaging [chest X-ray and chest computed tomography (CT)] at the time of admission.
Materials and methods
We extracted data from 396 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who were managed at 68 hospitals in Japan from January 25 to September 2, 2020. Case patients were categorized as severe (death or treatment with invasive ventilation during hospitalization) and non-severe groups. The imaging findings of the groups were compared by calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), adjusted for sex, age, and hospital size (and radiographic patient positioning for cardiomegaly). Chest X-ray and CT scores ranged from 0 to 72 and 0 to 20, respectively. Optimal cut-off values for these scores were determined by a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Results
The median age of the 396 patients was 48 years (interquartile range 28–65) and 211 (53.3%) patients were male. Thirty-two severe cases were compared to 364 non-severe cases. At the time of admission, abnormal lesions on chest X-ray and CT were mainly observed in the lower zone/lobe. Among severe cases, abnormal lesions were also seen in the upper zone/lobe. After adjustment, the total chest X-ray and CT score values showed a dose-dependent association with severe disease. For chest X-ray scores, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.91 (95% CI = 0.86–0.97) and an optimal cut-off value of 9 points predicted severe disease with 83.3% sensitivity and 84.7% specificity. For chest CT scores, the AUC was 0.94 (95% CI = 0.89–0.98) and an optimal cut-off value of 11 points predicted severe disease with 90.9% sensitivity and 82.2% specificity. Cardiomegaly was strongly associated with severe disease [adjusted OR = 24.6 (95% CI = 3.7–166.0)].
Conclusion
Chest CT and X-ray scores and the identification of cardiomegaly could be useful for classifying severe COVID-19 on admission.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections began to spread worldwide in 2020 [1, 2]. In Japan, the number of notifications in relation to disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) reached its first peak in April 2020 and its second peak in August 2020 [3, 4]. The deterioration of COVID-19 inpatients, suggested by the use of ventilation equipment, is a burden for both inpatients and facilities with limited medical resources. Many factors are suggested to predict a severe outcome [5, 6]. In addition to demographics, signs/symptoms that appear prior to admission, and hematological/biochemical laboratory findings, imaging analyses could be powerful tools for predicting the prognosis of COVID-19 patients at an early stage. The most common chest computed tomography (CT) patterns are ground-glass opacities (GGOs) and bilateral consolidation in the peripheral lower lung fields [7, 8]. CT seems to have superior diagnostic accuracy to chest X-ray [9]; however, in comparison to CT, chest X-ray may have advantages in terms of portability, accessibility, radiation exposure, and cost, and could provide benefits to both healthcare providers and patients. Therefore, we aimed to characterize COVID-19 inpatients based on chest X-ray findings in comparison to CT findings that were stored in a database that was established in Japan in February 2020.
Methods
Data collection
COVID-19 became a notifiable disease under the Infectious Diseases Control Law on February 1, 2020. On February 20, 2020, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan requested that public health centers (PHCs) collect the discharge summary of each COVID-19 patient from hospital and to report it to the National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID) under the Infectious Diseases Control Law. The summary included the following data: demographics, date of onset, hospitalization, and discharge, medical history before hospitalization, clinical course during hospitalization, hematological, biochemical, and radiological imaging test results at the time of admission, treatments during hospitalization, and the outcome on discharge. As of September 14, 2020, a total of 396 reports were collected from 68 hospitals and registered in the database for analysis. Hematological, biochemical, and radiological imaging tests on admission were defined as tests performed from 3 days before to 3 days after admission. A severe case was defined as an inpatient who died or who received mechanical ventilation; cases in which an inpatient did not die or receive mechanical ventilation were defined as non-severe.
Imaging analysis
All images were interpreted independently by two radiologists with 18 years (Y.O.) and 4 years (H.E.) of experience, respectively, in clinical radiology. CT images were evaluated for the following: lesion distribution (single/both lungs, central/peripheral), presence of GGOs, consolidation, air bronchogram, crazy paving pattern, subpleural line, bronchial wall thickening, bronchiectasis, pleural thickening, cavitation, CT halo, reversed halo, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, pulmonary emphysema, pulmonary fibrosis, and hilar and/or mediastinal lymphadenopathy. In addition, each lobe of the lung was assessed for opacification, and the lesion size was graded as follows: 0 (none), 1 (< 1 cm), 2 (1–3 cm), 3 (3 cm to < 50% of the lobe), or 4 (50–100% of the lobe). The score for each lobe was summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 20 [10, 11]. This total score was categorized into three groups: (1) ≤ 10 points, (2) 11–15 points, and (3) 16–20 points.
Chest X-ray images were evaluated for the following: reticular-nodular opacities, consolidation, cardiomegaly, nodules, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, and distribution (peripheral/perihilar/diffuse/basal predominance/superior predominance). The lungs were divided into six zones (right upper, right middle, right lower, left upper, left middle, and left lower), with each zone spanning one-third of the craniocaudal distance of the lung field [12]. The extent of airspace opacity in each zone was scored (0, no opacity; 1, < 25% opacity; 2, 25–49% opacity; 3, 50–74% opacity; 4, ≥ 75% opacity). The density of opacities was scored [0, clear; 1, hazy (vessel markings clearly visible); 2, moderate (vessel markings are partially obscured); 3, dense (vessels obscured, air bronchogram may be present)] according to the modified RALE score [12, 13]. The extent of involvement was calculated by multiplying the opacity by the density, yielding a score per zone ranging from 0 to 12. The total score for six zones ranged from 0 to 72. This total score was categorized into four groups: (1) ≤ 6 points; (2) 7–12 points; (3) 13–18 points; and (4) 19 points and over. A cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) of > 50% on an upright posterior–anterior (PA) chest X-ray and a CTR of > 55% on a decubitus or sitting anterior–posterior (AP) chest X-ray were considered abnormal and suggestive of cardiomegaly [14].
Statistical analyses
We described cases according to the demographics, symptoms, serological, and radiological test results at the time of admission. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using logistic regression to assess the association between severe disease status and chest CT/X-ray score; adjusted ORs controlling for age, sex, and hospital size (dichotomized into two groups of < 600 beds and ≥ 600 beds) were also calculated (further adjustment for X-ray radiographic patient positioning (PA or AP) was done for cardiomegaly). The p values for the serological test results were calculated by Wilcoxon rank sum test. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to calculate the area under the ROC curve (AUC) with 95% CI to estimate the optimal cut-off value of the chest CT/X-ray score. All analyses were conducted using STATA (ver. 16, Stata Corp, USA).
Ethics
The current study was conducted under Articles 12 and 15 of the Infectious Diseases Control Law in Japan and was therefore exempt from the requirement for ethical review, including the requirement of informed consent. The analysis was performed for public health purposes and none of the data presented included identifiable information.
Results
Three hundred ninety-six patients who were hospitalized from January 25, 2020 to September 2, 2020 were included in the present study. The patients were discharged after a median period of 13 days (IQR 8–19). The median age of the patients was 48 years (IQR 28–65), 211 (53.3%) were males, 118 (30.0%) had comorbidities, and 33 (8.3%) were smokers. These cases were classified into the severe group (n = 32) and the non-severe group (n = 364). The median time from the onset to hospitalization was 4.5 days (IQR 2.0–9.0) in the severe group and 5.0 days (IQR 2.0–8.0) in the non-severe group. A large proportion of the patients in the severe group were male and elderly (Table 1). Older age [OR = 1.10 (95% CI = 1.07–1.13) per increase in year] and male sex [OR = 2.8 (1.2–6.5)] were associated with severe disease. Patients with severe disease tended to have underlying diseases [e.g., hypertension, OR = 5.0 (95% CI = 2.3–10.7); diabetes, 6.2 (2.8–13.9); or malignant tumor, 23.9 (7.3–78.8)]. Regarding cancer, the severe group included 3 patients with prostate cancer, 1 patient with gastric cancer, and 1 patient with a thyroid tumor. In contrast, the non-severe group included 1 patient with breast cancer, 1 patient with cervical cancer, 1 patient with prostate cancer, 1 patient with colon cancer, and 1 patient with malignant lymphoma. A larger proportion of patients in the severe group had fever and respiratory symptoms from the onset of disease to admission in comparison to the non-severe group (Table 2). Few of the patients in the severe group had dysgeusia or dysosmia. Overall, 58 (13.9%) patients were asymptomatic both on admission and before admission. As for serological test results (Table 3), in severe cases, elevated levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were observed and were higher in severe cases (p < 0.01 per test).
Among 269 patients for whom CT images obtained at the time of admission were available, the most frequent findings in severe cases were GGO, followed by bronchiectasis, air bronchogram, subpleural line, crazy paving pattern, consolidation, and bronchial wall thickening (Fig. 1). Abnormalities were distributed in the peripheral region, but in severe cases, they also spread to the central region, and in most cases, this was observed bilaterally (Fig. 2). While one case had pulmonary edema and another had aspiration pneumonia, all cases had lesions due to COVID-19 pneumonia; Fig. 3 shows two representative cases with such lesions on CT. In non-severe cases, GGO was observed in the peripheral region (Fig. 3a), but was also found in the central region in some patients (Fig. 3b). Elevated total scores were observed in severe cases (Fig. 4; see also Supplementary Table 1). Severe cases presented high scores in not only the lower lobes but also the upper lobes (Supplementary Table 1). The total score groups were associated with severe disease in a dose-dependent manner as shown by the increase in the crude ORs with increase in total score (Table 4, top). The OR adjusted for sex and age (aOR) showed similar results; adjusted for sex, age, and hospital size, the associations of the CT scores remained the same. In addition, when the total score was treated as a continuous rather than categorical variable, the OR increased by 1.5 (95% CI = 1.3–1.7) for every 1-point increase in total score, and increased by 1.4 (95% CI = 1.2–1.6) when adjusted for age, sex, and hospital size. In the ROC analysis of the total score, the AUC was 0.93 (95% CI = 0.89–0.98) and an optimal cut-off score of 11 was found to predict severe disease with 90.9% sensitivity and 82.2% specificity.
Among 168 cases for which chest X-ray images obtained at the time of admission were available, the common findings of severe cases included reticular-nodular opacities, cardiomegaly, and consolidation (Fig. 3c and Fig. 5). In particular, high CTR values were observed in both PA and AP views of severe cases (Fig. 6) and cardiomegaly was strongly associated with severe disease [OR = 52.1 (95% CI = 13.0–208.4); aOR for sex, age, hospital size, and patient positioning of chest X-ray = 24.6 (95% CI = 3.7–166.0)]. For cardiomegaly, a case was excluded from the calculation due to insufficient information to classify to PA or AP. Abnormalities were distributed in both lungs, in each zone, and showed a basal predominance (Fig. 7; see also Supplementary Table 2). High total scores were also observed in severe cases (Fig. 8; see also Supplementary Table 2). The total score groups were associated with severe disease in a dose-dependent manner (Table 4, bottom, crude OR), and the aOR controlling for sex and age showed similar results. In addition, adjusted for hospital size, the association remained similar between severe disease and chest X-ray score. When the total score was treated as a continuous rather than categorical variable, the OR increased by 1.2 (95% CI = 1.1–1.2) for every 1-point increase in total score, and the aOR increased by 1.1 (95% CI = 1.0–1.2), after adjustment for sex, age, and hospital size. An ROC analysis of the total score revealed that the AUC was 0.91 (95% CI = 0.86–0.97) and an optimal cut-off value of 9 predicted severe disease with 83.3% sensitivity and 84.7% specificity. Considering the presence of cardiomegaly on admission, for patients without cardiomegaly on admission, a high chest X-ray score of ≥ 9 showed a strong association with severe disease (crude OR = 44.1; 95% CI = 5.1–377.7; aOR controlling for sex, age, and hospital size = 11.7; 95% CI = 1.1–119.5). In patients with cardiomegaly on admission, a high chest X-ray score was not associated with severe disease (crude OR = 1.3; 95% CI = 0.1–20.7).
Discussion
This is the first comprehensive report on the characteristics of the imaging findings on admission among laboratory-confirmed COIVD-19 patients in Japan. Older age and male sex were associated with severe disease, which was consistent with previous reports [1, 15, 16]. Abnormal signs in severe cases were mostly observed in the peripheral and basal regions; in severe cases, abnormalities were more frequently observed in the central region of both lungs. In logistic regression, adjusted for sex, age, and hospital size, a dose-dependent association between severe disease and the total chest X-ray and CT scores was found. Regarding the chest X-ray score, an optimal cut-off value of 9 points was found to predict severe disease with high sensitivity and specificity, although the sensitivity was lower than that of the CT score. Of note, adjusted for sex, age, hospital size, and radiographic patient positioning, cardiomegaly was strongly associated with severe disease.
In the severe group, GGO was observed on CT in all cases, with most showing progress to the crazy paving pattern, air bronchogram, and bronchiectasis. The lesions of severe COVID pneumonia are reported to be mainly located in the lower lobe/zone but not in the upper lobe/zone [5, 7, 10, 17]; however, in the severe cases in our study, the lesions of COVID pneumonia had already spread evenly to the upper lobes/zones by the time of admission (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). Our analysis strongly suggests that the chest X-ray and CT scores, including for the upper lobes/zones, are useful as an indicator of severity. The time period from the onset to hospitalization of the severe cases (4.5 days) was similar to that of the non-severe cases (5 days); thus, the reason for the development of lesions in the upper lobe/zone in the severe cases may not be delayed hospitalization and remains unclear.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to link cardiomegaly to severity on chest X-ray images. In this study, there was no history of heart disease as an underlying disease in any of the cases with cardiomegaly. The reason why cardiomegaly was observed on chest X-ray images may be due to prior hypertension and/or the right-ventricular overload caused by COVID-19-induced pulmonary hypertension [18]. Multiple mechanisms have been suggested to underlie the development of pulmonary hypertension, including worsening myocardial injury, cytokine storm, and the presence of thrombotic microangiopathy [19]. On the other hand, a report of three administrative autopsies of undiagnosed COVID-19-related deaths identified left-ventricular hypertrophy in each autopsy and all cases had prior hypertension [20]. We confirmed that 15 of 17 cases with cardiomegaly in the severe group were not in a severe state (i.e., they did not require mechanical ventilation) on admission; the remaining 2 cases with cardiomegaly were in a severe state (i.e., they received mechanical ventilation) on admission and showed high chest X-ray scores. Overall, these findings indicate that the identification of patients with cardiomegaly on admission may be useful for the classification of severe disease.
Searching for cardiomegaly on chest X-ray images will be even more noteworthy when CT examinations are difficult to perform for some reason (e.g., when there are restrictions in relation to bringing patients into the CT laboratory, or when there is a shortage of CT equipment). With regard to other relevant chest X-ray findings, we identified that high scores of both airspace opacity and density in the upper and middle zones could be useful when considering severity. Furthermore, we identified an optimal cut-off value of 9, which showed 83.3% sensitivity and 84.7% specificity. The specificity was a little higher than that of CT (82.2%).
The present study was associated with some limitations. Data were not systematically collected and it is possible that the COVID-19 inpatients included asymptomatic patients who were hospitalized as an administrative response. In consideration of this potential bias, a sensitivity analysis was performed with the sample restricted to symptomatic subjects; however, there was little change in the association between severe disease and the CT score [aOR = 7.8 (95% CI = 3.1–19.9)] or chest X-ray score [aOR = 2.0 (1.1–3.4)], and the aOR for cardiomegaly on chest X-ray remained high [23.3 (3.3–165.1)] after adjustment for sex, age, hospital size, and radiographic patient positioning. Cardiomegaly, indeed, may be involved in severe outcomes. However, the patient data on BMI, obesity, and the presence of cardiomegaly prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection were insufficient, and further investigation is required.
In conclusion, we characterized the imaging findings of COVID-19 inpatients on admission. We emphasize that the use of chest X-ray for scoring and identifying cardiomegaly is useful for the classification of severe COVID-19 on admission.
References
Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. New Engl J Med. 2020;382:727–33.
Guan W, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. New Engl J Med. 2020;382:1708–820.
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. Novel coronavirus (COVID-19) Available at: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000164708_00079.html. Accessed October 22, 2021.
Arima Y, Shimada T, Suzuki M, Suzuki T, Kobayashi Y, Tsuchihashi Y, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection among returnees to Japan from Wuhan, China, 2020. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26:1596–600.
Gallo Marin B, Aghagoli G, Lavine K, Yang L, Siff EJ, Chiang SS, et al. Predictors of COVID-19 severity: a literature review. Rev Med Virol. 2021;31:1–10.
Bai HX, Hsieh B, Xiong Z, Halsey K, Choi JW, Tran TML, et al. Performance of radiologists in differentiating COVID-19 from non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia at chest CT. Radiology. 2020;296:E46-54.
Wong HYF, Lam HYS, Fong AH, Leung ST, Chin TW, Lo CSY, et al. Frequency and distribution of chest radiographic findings in patients positive for COVID-19. Radiology. 2020;296:E72–8.
Chung M, Bernheim A, Mei X, Zhang N, Huang M, Zeng X, et al. CT imaging features of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Radiology. 2020;295:202–7.
Borakati A, Perera A, Johnson J, Sood T. Diagnostic accuracy of X-ray versus CT in COVID-19: a propensity-matched database study. BMJ Open. 2020;10: e042946.
Xiong Y, Sun D, Liu Y, Fan Y, Zhao L, Li X, et al. Clinical and high-resolution CT features of the COVID-19 infection: comparison of the initial and follow-up changes. Invest Radiol. 2020;55:332–9.
Wong KT, Antonio GE, Hui DS, Lee N, Yuen EH, Wu A, et al. Thin-section CT of severe acute respiratory syndrome: evaluation of 73 patients exposed to or with the disease. Radiology. 2003;228:395–400.
Hui TCH, Khoo HW, Young BE, Haja Mohideen SM, Lee YS, Lim CJ, et al. Clinical utility of chest radiography for severe COVID-19. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020;10:1540–50.
Warren MA, Zhao Z, Koyama T, Bastarache JA, Shaver CM, Semler MW, et al. Severity scoring of lung oedema on the chest radiograph is associated with clinical outcomes in ARDS. Thorax. 2018;73:840–6.
Truszkiewicz K, Poręba R, Gać P. Radiological cardiothoracic ratio in evidence-based medicine. J Clin Med. 2021;10:2016.
Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054–62.
Tsuchihashi Y, Arima Y, Takahashi T, Kanou K, Kobayashi Y, Sunagawa T, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for severe outcomes of novel coronavirus infection, January–March 2020. Japan J Epidemiol. 2021;31:487–94.
Shi H, Han X, Jiang N, Cao Y, Alwalid O, Gu J, et al. Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:425–34.
Hayama H, Ishikane M, Sato R, Kanda K, Kinoshita N, Izumi S, et al. Association of plain computed tomography-determined pulmonary artery-to-aorta ratio with clinical severity of coronavirus disease 2019. Pulm Circ. 2020;10:2045894020969492.
Mishra A, Lal A, Sahu KK, George AA, Martin K, Sargent J. An update on pulmonary hypertension in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Acta Biomed. 2020;91: e2020155.
Kimura S, Hamamatsu A, Hayashi K, Nakajima N, Suzuki T. Three autopsy cases of undiagnosed COVID-19-related death. Infect Agents Surveill Rep. 2021;42:34–5.
Acknowledgements
We thank Itakura hospital; SECOMEDIC hospital; St. Mary’s Hospital, Our Lady of the Snow Social Medical Corporation; and all other institutions for submitting patients’ data. We also appreciate the help of MHLW and PHCs of local governments in requesting and collecting patients’ data. This study was partly supported by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare [Grant Number 21HA1004 and 21HA2015].
CDSD consisted of the following members (in alphabetical order): Yusuke Ajishi (Miyazaki Prefectural Nobeoka Hospital), Hiroshi Ishii (Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital), Satoru Ishikawa (Funabashi Central Hospital), Hajime Iwagoe (Kumamoto City Hospital), Yasushi Kaneko (Hiratsuka City Hospital), Kei Kasahara (Nara Medical University), Yoji Kawaguchi (Japanese Red Cross Sendai Hospital), Masafumi Masuda (Shizuoka City Shimizu Hospital), Momoko Mawatari (Japanese Red Cross Medical Center), Yasunori Mishima (Oita Sanai Medical Center), Yoji Nagasaki (National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center), Norio Ohmagari (National Center for Global Health and Medicine Hospital), Kensaku Okada (Tottori University Hospital), Hiroshi Satoh (Oita Oka Hospital), Yasuhiko Terai (Shizuoka City Shizuoka Hospital), Katsuya Tsujie (Asahikawa Kosei General Hospital), Haruhito Watase (Higashiosaka City Medical Center).
Funding
This study was supported by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare [Grant Number 21HA1004 and 21HA2015].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
AK and YT: designed the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. YO and HE: performed imaging analysis. AK, YT, YA, TT, YK, and TS: acquired data from YA, HI, SI, HI, YK, KK, YK, MM, MM, YM, YN, NO, KO, HS, YTerai, KT, and HW through PHCs. YA, KK, and MS: performed data interpretation. YA: also contributed to the data analysis and the drafting of the manuscript. MS, TS, and YT: reviewed the manuscript and managed the finances. YA, HI, SI, HI, YK, KK, YK, MM, MM, YM, YN, NO, KO, HS, YTerai, KT, and HW: acquired primary patient’s data. All authors revised the manuscript, finally approved the revision, and agreed to be responsible to all aspects of the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Atsuhiro Kanayama, Yuuki Tsuchihashi, Yoichi Otomi, Hideaki Enomoto, Yuzo Arima, Takuri Takahashi, Yusuke Kobayashi, Koki Kaku, Yusuke Ajishi, Hiroshi Ishii, Satoru Ishikawa, Hajime Iwagoe, Yasushi Kaneko, Kei Kasahara, Yoji Kawaguchi, Masafumi Masuda, Momoko Mawatari, Yasunori Mishima, Yoji Nagasaki, Norio Ohmagari, Kensaku Okada, Hiroshi Satoh, Yasuhiko Terai, Katsuya Tsujie, Haruhito Watase, Tomimasa Sunagawa and Motoi Suzuki declare they have no conflicts of interest in association with the present study. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript and there is no financial interest to report. We certify that the submission is original work and is not under review at any other publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Kanayama, A., Tsuchihashi, Y., Otomi, Y. et al. Association of severe COVID-19 outcomes with radiological scoring and cardiomegaly: findings from the COVID-19 inpatients database, Japan. Jpn J Radiol 40, 1138–1147 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-022-01300-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-022-01300-2