Abstract
Meckel’s diverticulum is the most common congenital abnormality of the gastrointestinal tract. It is a true diverticulum containing all layers of the intestinal wall and identified as a saccular, blind-ending structure located on the antimesenteric border of the distal ileum. Most patients remain asymptomatic during their lifetime. Symptomatic cases are nonspecific and can present as small-bowel obstruction, diverticulitis, perforation, gastrointestinal bleeding, and rarely, a neoplasm. Therefore, the radiological diagnosis is of paramount important for proper patient management.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Meckel’s diverticulum is the most common congenital abnormality of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. In the majority of patients, it is asymptomatic and usually found within 40–100 cm of the ileocecal valve. In symptomatic cases, clinical presentation is unspecific and mimics many other conditions, such as appendicitis and small-bowel obstruction. The purposes of this review are to describe embryology and anatomy, describe the value and limitations of different imaging modalities in diagnosis, and emphasize the important complications.
Teaching points:
-
Meckel’s diverticulum is the most common congenital abnormality of the gastrointestinal tract
-
Meckel’s diverticulum is a true diverticulum
-
The most common heterotopic tissue within Meckel’s diverticulum is gastric mucosa
-
Junctional fold patterns on barium examination confirm the presence of Meckel’s diverticulum
-
Computed tomography is the imaging modality of choice in the diagnosis of complicated Meckel’s diverticulum
-
Gastrointestinal bleeding is the most common complication of Meckel’s diverticulum
-
Carcinoid tumor is the most commonly reported neoplasm complicating Meckel’s diverticulum
Embryology and anatomy
Meckel’s diverticulum, the remnant of the omphalomesenteric or vitelline duct that connects the fetal midgut to the yolk sac, is reported to occur in 2 % of the population [1]. In the embryonic period, the midgut temporarily communicates with the yolk sac through the omphalomesenteric duct, which is typically regressed during the fifth to eighth week of life. Failed or incomplete closure of the duct results in two main variants: one resulting from complete regression of the fibrous channel to the umbilicus, resulting a diverticulum with a free blind end (Meckel’s diverticulum; 90 % of cases), and the other occurring in the form of a persistent fibrous band connecting the diverticulum to the umbilicus. Other less common variants are umbilicoileal fistula, umbilical sinus, umbilical cyst, and a fibrous cord connecting the ileum to the umbilicus.
Meckel’s diverticulum identified as a saccular, blind-ending structure usually found at the antimesenteric border of the distal small bowel, typically 40–100 cm from the ileocecal valve; Yamakuchi et al. reported an average distance of 50 cm [2]. It is a true diverticulum comprising mucosa, muscularis, and serosa. It is typically lined with ileal mucosa-type epithelium but, occasionally, heterotopic tissue is found. The gastric mucosa is the most common tissue (62 % of cases) [2], but others include pancreatic tissue (6 %), combined gastric mucosa and pancreatic tissue (5 %), jejunal mucosa (2 %), Brunner’s glands (2 %), and other tissues (10 %) [2]. Its finger-like structure is 3–5 cm long, with an axial diameter up to 2 cm, but it occasionally presents as a large, saccular lesion up to 5–10 cm diameter [3]. Rare cases of diverticula larger than the ileal loops have been reported [4, 5].
Vascular supply is via the omphalomesenteric artery, which is the origin of two vitelline arteries. One artery disappears during the fifth to sixth week of gestation, while the other becomes the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Arterial supply of the persistent omphalomesenteric duct is fed by a remnant of the primitive vitelline artery arising from the ileal branch of the SMA or, less frequently, from the ileocolic artery.
Classic description
The “rule of twos” is the classic description for Meckel’s diverticulum: It is present in 2 % of the population, with a 2:1 male to female ratio, is found approximately 2 feet from the ileocecal valve, measures 2 inches in length, is frequently symptomatic before 2 years of age, and 2 % of these patients develop complications over their lifetime [1]. Large diverticula >2 cm have a high risk of complication than shorter diverticula.
Clinical presentations
Most Meckel’s diverticulum is clinically silent and incidentally discovered during radiologic examination or abdominal surgery for unrelated conditions [6]. It has no association with other major congenital malformations. Intestinal bleeding is the most common complication in the pediatric population, usually associated with diverticula containing ectopic gastric mucosa [7]. Intestinal obstruction is the second most common complication. However, clinical symptoms from complications occur more frequently in the adult population [1] and include small-bowel obstruction and diverticulitis with or without complications such as perforation, GI bleeding, and neoplasm.
Imaging diagnosis of Meckel’s diverticulum
Various imaging modalities have been used to diagnose Meckel’s diverticulum. However, computed tomography (CT) with the adjunct of scintigraphy or angiography are frequently used, particularly when there is a complication.
Plain film
Plain film is generally considered of limited value, although it can show enteroliths, calcific contents, gas-filled diverticulum (Fig. 1), or complication such as bowel obstruction or pneumoperitoneum—the latter if perforation has occurred.
Barium examination
Meckel’s diverticulum is sometimes difficult to detect or distinguish from normal small bowel because of its small orifice, peristalsis with prompt emptying, or blockage of barium filling by internal contents. When there is a complication, barium examination should be avoided due to the risk of barium leakage. Other limitations include overlapping of small-bowel loops and incomplete small-bowel distension. Key features of barium examination are identification of junctional fold patterns (Fig. 2), especially at the site of attachment to the normal small bowel, which includes a “triradiate fold pattern” when the loops are collapsed (Fig. 3) and a “mucosal triangular plateau” when the loops are distended. Both are termed “junctional fold pattern” and are considered as characteristic [8]. Filling defects and mucosal irregularity in the diverticula may suggest intussusception and gastric mucosa or tumor.
Sonography
Sonography, although of limited value, merits discussion, since it is widely available in all institutions. The characteristic sonographic pattern of Meckel’s diverticulum is “the gut signature”, formed by an alternate hyperechoic inner layer corresponding to mucosa/submucosa, and hypoechoic outer layer corresponding to the muscular layer. In cases of obstructed or fluid-filled diverticulum, sonography may show a variable pattern (Fig. 4).
Differentiation between Meckel’s diverticulum and acquired diverticula
Meckel’s diverticulum is usually a single diverticulum arising from the antimesenteric border of the distal ileum, typically 40–100 cm from the ileocecal valve, while acquired diverticula are varied in terms of number, location, point of attachment to small bowel (usually arising from the mesenteric border), and lack of junctional fold pattern (Fig. 5). The appendix is also a blind-ending pouch, longer and narrower than Meckel’s diverticulum, with typical location.
Computed tomography
Meckel’s diverticulum, if small, is quite difficult to distinguish from normal ileal loops in uncomplicated cases. If it is >3 cm in diameter, it appears as a blind-ending gas- or fluid-filled structure. CT is considered to be the imaging modality of choice in the diagnosis of complicated Meckel’s diverticulum. Recently, modern multidetector CT (MDCT) allows high-resolution images, with supplementary multiplanar reconstructed images providing the best depiction of Meckel’s diverticulum, which is often concealed by adjacent small-bowel loops. Particulary ileal continuation of diverticula is detected on oblique coronal or sagittal views (Fig. 6).
Angiography
Angiography can show persistent vitelline artery, which typically arises from mid or distal branches of the SMA. Occasionally, this artery can be visualized by MDCT (Fig. 6). Heterotopic gastric mucosa may demonstrate dense blush. Extravasation of contrast material in case of active GI bleeding typically requires bleeding at a rate of at least 0.5 ml/min in order to be visualized [9].
Scintigraphy
Radionuclide scan may provide a clue to diagnose Meckel’s diverticulum with complication. To identify the site of heterotopic gastric mucosa, 99mTc- pertechnetate is taken up by the heterotopic gastric mucosa in the diverticulum. Higher sensitivity in children (85–90 %) than in adults (60 %) is reported [10]. To identify the site of GI bleeding, 99mTc-sulfur colloid or erythrocyte labelled with the same tracer can be performed. Accumulation of radionuclide substance in the typical location of Meckel’s diverticulum is consistent with a diverticulum with hemorrhage, in which the diverticulum must be actively bleeding at a rate of at least 0.1 ml/min. Identifying bleeding on scintigraphy is sensitive but not specific. Bleeding may be detected, but the source may not be Meckel’s diverticulum; however, specificity reaches 100 % if findings on a subsequent scintigraphy for heterotopic gastric mucosa is positive.
Complications of Meckel’s diverticulum
In the majority of patients, Meckel’s diverticulum is asymptomatic. Risk of complications (produce symptoms) varies, ranging from 4 to 25 % [11].
Common complications
Hemorrhage
Hemorrhage is the most common complication of Meckel’s diverticulum, and it is more frequent in young children. Two possible mechanisms include peptic ulcer formation in the heterotopic gastric mucosa in diverticula and damage to the adjacent ileal mucosa by hyperacidity. 99mTc- pertechnetate scintigraphy is the imaging modality of choice (Fig. 7). Extravasation of contrast media at the diverticular neck with delayed contrast accumulation into the blind-ended structure attached to the distal ileum is the imaging hallmark on CT in active bleeding cases. In chronic or intermittent bleeding, it may show mural thickening of these diverticula.
Bowel obstruction
Bowel obstruction is the second most common complication of Meckel’s diverticulum and is the consequence of ulceration and fibrosing stenosis of the attached ileum due to acid secretion by heterotopic tissue in the diverticulum. Other mechanisms include incarceration of bowel loops beneath the fibrous band connecting the diverticulum to the umbilical region, diverticula inversion causing intraluminal obstruction or functioning as a lead point to an ileoileal intussusceptions (Fig. 8), and extension into a hernia sac (Littre’s hernia). CT is the imaging modality of choice for the workup of this complication.
Diverticulitis
Diverticulitis accounts for up to 30 % of symptomatic cases [12]. It may clinically mimic acute appendicitis. Pathogenesis commonly occurs secondary to inflammation caused by acid secretion, luminal obstruction identical to those of acute appendicitis caused by enteroliths, or neoplasm. Scintigraphy has been performed to diagnose Meckel’s diverticulitis caused by heterotopic gastric mucosa and usually shows a localized increased uptake [13]. CT is the preferred imaging modality, which usually depicts a blind-ended pouch of variable size with increased mural thickness (Fig. 9), increased diverticular wall enhancement, and air, fluid, or internal content surrounded by mesenteric inflammation. In more severe cases, abscess can develop (Fig. 10).
Uncommon complications
Enterolith formation
Enterolith formation is an uncommon complication and can be seen in 3–10 % of Meckel’s diverticulum [12]. Enteroliths are assumed to form as a result of stasis and manifest as peripheral calcification with a radiolucent center and, less often, have a laminated pattern. Plain film and unenhanced CT should be more valuable in detecting an enterolith.
Perforation
Perforation is a serious complication and usually secondary to diverticulitis, gangrene, and peptic ulcer [12]. The presence of pneumoperitoneum in the setting of Meckel’s diverticulum is the imaging consideration.
Neoplasm
Neoplasm is a rare complication, accounting for up to 3 % of complicated cases [14]. Carcinoid tumor is the most frequently reported neoplasm complicating Meckel’s diverticulum (Fig. 11). Other tumors include leiomyoma, leiomyosarcoma, and adenocarcinoma. Imaging features are nonspecific.
References
Elsayes KM, Menias CO, Harvin HJ, Francis IR. Imaging manifestations of Meckel’s diverticulum. AJR. 2007;189:81–8.
Yamaguchi M, Takeucchi S, Awazu S. Meckel’s diverticulum: investigation of 600 patients in Japanese literature. Am J Surg. 1978;137:247–9.
Mortele KJ, Govaere F, Vogelaerts D, et al. Giant Meckel’s diverticulum containing enteroliths: typical CT imaging findings. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:82–4.
Rose BS, Pretorius DL. A giant Meckel’s diverticulum in an adult. AJR. 1992;158:1408–9.
Torii Y, Hisatsune I, Imamural K, Morita K, Kumagaya N, Nakata H. Giant Meckel diverticulum containing enteroliths diagnosed by computed tomography and sonography. Gastrointest Radiol. 1989;14:167–9.
Bani-Hani KE, Shatnawi NF. Meckel’s diverticulum: comparison of incidental and symptomatic cases. World J Surg. 2004;28:917–20.
Sharma RK, Jain VK. Emergency surgery of Meckel’s diverticulum. World J Emerg Surg. 2008;3:27–34.
Rossi P, Gourtsoyiannis N, Bezzi M, et al. Meckel’s diverticulum: imaging diagnosis. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:567–73.
Mitchell AW, Spencer J, Allison DJ, et al. Meckel’s diverticulum: angiographic findings in 16 patients. AJR. 1998;170:1329–33.
Poulsen KA, Qvist N. Sodium pertechnetate scintigraphy in detection of Meckel’s diverticulum: is it usuable? Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2000;10:228–31.
Yahchouchy EK, Marano AF, Etienne JCF, Fingerhut AL. Meckel’s diverticulum. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192(5):658–62.
Kusumoto H, Yoshida M, Takahashi I. Complications and diagnosis of Meckel’s diverticulum in 776 patients. Am J Surg. 1992;164:382–3.
Connolly SA, Drubach LA, Connolly LP. Meckel’s diverticulitis:diagnosis with computed tomography and Tc-99 m pertechnetate scintigraphy. Clin Nucl Med. 2004;29:823–4.
Konstantakos AK. Meckel;s diverticulum-induced ileocolonic intussusceptions. Am J Surg. 2004;187:557–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
About this article
Cite this article
Srisajjakul, S., Prapaisilp, P. & Bangchokdee, S. Many faces of Meckel’s diverticulum and its complications. Jpn J Radiol 34, 313–320 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-016-0530-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-016-0530-x