Abstract
A variety of medical devices are used to monitor or treat abdominal and pelvic diseases. They are routinely recognized on abdominal radiographs and computed tomography (CT), and complications associated with their use are not uncommon. The complications associated with the use of the medical devices are migration, malposition and fracture, which can be easily recognized on abdominal radiographs. Additional potential complications include bleeding, obstruction, infection and organ injury, which may be detected on CT. Therefore, awareness of these complications and familiarity with their imaging findings are important aspects of the management of patients with medical devices. The aim of this pictorial review is to demonstrate the abdominal radiography and CT features of potential complications associated with the use of medical devices.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
A wide variety of medical devices are used for patient management, and they are usually evident with distinctive features on abdominal radiographs and computed tomography (CT) [1–3]. Complications associated with their use are not uncommon [4]. In fact, the complications may be as varied as the types of medical devices, the purpose of their use and the condition of each patient who has them. Complications following placement of medical devices account for significant numbers of requests to inform the patients’ physicians promptly. Radiology plays an important role in the monitoring of patients with indwelling medical devices as well as in the diagnosis of potential complications associated with these devices. To our knowledge, no previous systematic review has specifically focused on complications related to medical devices seen in the abdomen and pelvis.
The purpose of this pictorial review is to familiarize radiologists with complications associated with various tubes, stents, assorted catheters and some miscellaneous devices on abdominal radiographs and CT. To this end, we illustrate abdominal radiograph and CT findings of the complications, which are grouped into a few major categories for simplification, consisting of migration, malposition, fractures and miscellaneous (Table 1).
Migration
Migration means spontaneous displacement of a medical device from its original insertion site. Occurrence of migration can be categorized as follows: (1) an internal drainage stent at the conduit system, such as the pancreatico-biliary duct, gastrointestinal tract and urinary tract; (2) an external drainage catheter, such as percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and percutaneous abscess drainage; (3) any device with a special purpose, such as an intrauterine device (IUD), accompanied by solid organ perforation.
Pancreatic and biliary stents
Pancreatic and biliary stents are made with plastic or metal and are usually used for patients who have an obstructed pancreatic or bile duct. The major adverse events are migration and stent occlusion. Migration occurs in 5–10 % of cases with pancreatic or biliary stents (Fig. 1) [5]. Uncovered self-expandable metallic stents migrate less frequently than covered metallic stents or plastic stents.
Gastrointestinal stent
Gastrointestinal stents are mainly used to reestablish patency in various diseases causing gastrointestinal tract obstructions (Fig. 2). Although covered stents benefit from lower rates of obstruction by tumor in-growth, they have a tendency to migrate more frequently than uncovered stents [6]. The migration rate of covered stents has been reported to be 10–25 %, whereas migration of uncovered stents has been reported to be 2–6 % [6]. The migrated stent itself can cause fatal complications such as bowel obstruction, hemorrhage or perforation (Fig. 3).
Ureteral stent
Ureteral stents are generally implanted for the treatment of ureteral obstruction or fistula (Fig. 4) [7]. The proximal and distal parts of the stents are designed in a J or pigtail shape to prevent migration from the ureter. Nevertheless, the migration of a stent can occur as a result of peristalsis (Fig. 5) [7].
External drainage catheter
Percutaneous catheter drainage is generally used for management of abscess or abnormal fluid collection, to relieve the obstruction of any conduit organ or to provide an access route for stent placement (Fig. 6) [1]. Once the catheter has been successfully inserted, it is important to maintain the catheter in the optimal position. If the catheter tip migrates, the drainage function may be dramatically impaired (Fig. 7). To avoid catheter migration, catheter fixation to the skin is important.
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheter
CAPD is mainly used for the treatment of patients with end-stage renal failure (Fig. 8) [8]. In catheter placement, the distal tip of the CAPD catheter should be inserted in a dependent position into the pelvic cavity to allow adequate outflow during dialysate exchange. Migration of the catheter tip out of the pelvic cavity causes impaired dialysate outflow and inadequate fluid drainage (Fig. 9). The incidence of this event is reported as 57 % of patients within 1 year of catheter placement [8].
Intrauterine device
IUDs are commonly used and highly effective temporary contraceptive devices. They should be located centrally within the endometrial cavity. However, they can migrate within the uterine cavity, be released distally into the vagina or be expelled into the peritoneal cavity via uterine perforation (Fig. 10) [2].
Malposition
Malposition of a medical device is defined as an inappropriate position in comparison with the expected placement; it can occur during the insertion procedure [7]. Common medical devices of the abdomen and pelvis, such as nasogastric tubes (Fig. 11), gastrostomy tubes (Fig. 12) and Foley catheters (Fig. 13), may be inappropriately positioned [4].
Nasogastric tubes have been inserted at the bedside blindly, without fluoroscopic visualization [2]. The tube is often inserted not in the stomach, but in another site of the gastrointestinal tract such as the esophagus or duodenum, sometimes even the trachea (Fig. 14). Gastrostomy tubes are placed surgically, endoscopically or percutaneously for long-term assisted feeding. The inflated balloon component of the tube maintains the position of the tip, which should be placed in the stomach [2]. Malposition is one common complication after gastrostomy tube insertion (Fig. 15). Malposition of the tube can cause peritonitis by leakage of gastric contents into the peritoneal cavity. Malposition of a Foley catheter can lead to injury resulting from inflation of the catheter balloon within the urethra [4].
Fracture
Fractures of some medical devices may be attributed to device materials, implantation duration, the anatomical structure in which a device is placed and any procedures after device installation [9]. The underreported incidence of stent fractures might be due to a lack of awareness and difficulty in detecting the events [10]. Fractures of a biliary or gastrointestinal stent can occur spontaneously or can be caused by balloon dilatation or argon plasma coagulation, which are used for the treatment of tumor regrowth (Fig. 16) [10]. These fractures can cause gastrointestinal bleeding, recurrent biliary obstruction, bowel obstruction or perforation.
Inferior vena cava filters have been used to prevent life-threatening pulmonary embolism in patients with refractory anticoagulation therapy (Fig. 17) [1]. The risk of filter fracture may be related to the length of time the filter remains in the body, although the reported incidence of filter fractures was approximately 5.5 %; the predicted fracture rate at 5.5 years was 40 % in one study (Fig. 18) [9]. In addition, migration of fractured fragments can cause life-threatening complications. Thus, if protection from pulmonary emboli is no longer needed, removing the filter should be considered as soon as possible.
Miscellaneous
Retention of ingested diagnostic devices
Some medical devices are designed to be swallowed and usually exit the body on their own over time [3]. Inappropriately retained medical devices can cause irritation, inflammation, bowel obstruction and even more severe complications such as abscess formation.
Capsule endoscopy has been used to evaluate small bowel disease (Fig. 19). A diagnostic endoscopy capsule should exit the body within 1–2 days [11]. Capsule retention is the most feared complication of the procedure and is defined as the capsule remaining in the gastrointestinal tract more than 2 weeks [11]. The risk of capsule retention ranges from 0 to 13 %, and it occurs more frequently in patients with bowel stricture of known Crohn’s disease [11]. Serial follow-up of abdominal radiographs or CT can be helpful to verify the location of a capsule if retention is suspected (Fig. 20) [3].
Infection
The use of medical devices can increase the risk of bacterial or fungal growth. Catheters are particularly associated with increased nosocomial infection rates [12]. The main concern of infection associated with medical devices of the abdomen and pelvis may be peritonitis. Infection is the most common complication related to CAPD catheters and peritoneal segments of ventriculo-peritoneal shunts [8, 13]. Infection can also develop as a complication of stent instrumentation [7, 10]. Infection can be difficult to recognize on abdominal radiographs; therefore, CT plays an important role in detecting infection (Fig. 21).
Bleeding
Bleeding can occur during the installation of a medical device or shortly after its removal. Most minor bleeding from the abdominal wall can be managed by application of compressive devices [14]. However, some cases of refractory bleeding and intraperitoneal active bleeding remain the most serious complications, requiring embolization or surgical intervention. Bleeding cannot be detected with abdominal radiographs alone. Contrast-enhanced multidetector CT is an accurate diagnostic modality to detect bleeding (Fig. 22).
Retained surgical sponge
Retained surgical sponges are sponges or towels that are unintentionally left behind in a patient’s body after the completion of an operation. The frequency of retention of surgical sponges or swabs in the abdomen and pelvis has been reported as about 0.02–1 % [15]. Retained sponges are usually asymptomatic, but can sometimes result in a granulomatous response with abscess formation, intestinal obstruction or fistula formation. Most retained surgical sponges are usually detectable on plain radiographs because they have radiopaque markers. However, surgical sponges without visible radiopaque markers can only be identified on CT. Although CT appearances of retained surgical sponges are widely variable, a whorled configuration or a spongiform pattern with contained air bubbles is a typical finding (Fig. 23) [15].
Conclusion
With only the slightest attention to medical devices, complications, such as migration, malposition or fracture, can be easily recognized on plain radiographs. CT can also play an important role in detecting and diagnosing other complications such as infection, bleeding, obstruction or organ injury. Familiarity with medical devices and early detection of the complications related to their use by an abdominal radiograph or CT can allow radiologists to provide important information to the clinicians, potentially helping to improve patient management.
References
Hunter TB, Taljanovic MS. Medical devices of the abdomen and pelvis. Radiographics. 2005;25:503–23.
Bahrami S, Chow D, Kadell B. Thoracic and abdominal devices radiologists should recognize: pictorial review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:S106–18.
Gayer G, Petrovitch I, Jeffrey RB. Foreign objects encountered in the abdominal cavity at CT. Radiographics. 2011;31:409–28.
Taljanovic MS, Hunter TB, Freundlich IM, Mar WA, Smyth SH, O’Brien MJ. Misplaced devices in the chest, abdomen, and pelvis: part II. Semin Ultrasound CTMR. 2006;27:98–110.
ASGE Technology Assessment Committee, Pfau PR, Pleskow DK, Banerjee S, Barth BA, Bhat YM, et al. Pancreatic and biliary stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:319–27.
Kim SG, Yang CH. Upper gastrointestinal stent. Clin Endosc. 2012;45:386–91.
Dyer RB, Chen MY, Zagoria RJ, Regan JD, Hood CG, Kavanagh PV. Complications of ureteral stent placement. Radiographics. 2002;22:1005–22.
Stuart S, Booth TC, Cash CJ, Hameeduddin A, Goode JA, Harvey C, et al. Complications of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Radiographics. 2009;29:441–60.
Tam MD, Spain J, Lieber M, Geisinger M, Sands MJ, Wang W. Fracture and distant migration of the Bard recovery filter: a retrospective review of 363 implantations for potentially life-threatening complications. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23:199–205.
Catalano O, De Bellis M, Sandomenico F, de Lutio di Castelguidone E, Delrio P, Petrillo A. Complications of biliary and gastrointestinal stents: MDCT of the cancer patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:W187–96.
Boysen M, Ritter M. Small bowel obstruction from capsule endoscopy. West J Emerg Med. 2010;11:71–3.
von Eiff C, Jansen B, Kohnen W, Becker K. Infections associated with medical devices: pathogenesis, management and prophylaxis. Drugs. 2005;65:179–214.
Chung JJ, Yu JS, Kim JH, Nam SJ, Kim MJ. Intraabdominal complications secondary to ventriculoperitoneal shunts: CT findings and review of the literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1311–7.
Schrag SP, Sharma R, Jaik NP, Seamon MJ, Lukaszczyk JJ, Martin ND, et al. Complications related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. A comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2007;16:407–18.
O’Connor AR, Coakley FV, Meng MV, Eberhardt SC. Imaging of retained surgical sponges in the abdomen and pelvis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:481–9.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical statement
All procedures were in accordance with ethical standards for human experimentation and the Helsinki Declaration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, J.S., Kim, H.C., Kim, S.W. et al. Complications related to medical devices of the abdomen and pelvis: pictorial essay. Jpn J Radiol 33, 177–186 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0400-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0400-y