Abstract
Natural dyes extracted from Eleiodoxa conferta and Garcinia atroviridis were used for the first time as photosensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Anthocyanin was identified as the main pigments that sensitize the semiconductor of TiO2 film. Anthocyanin pigment contains hydroxyl and carboxylic groups in the molecule that can attach effectively to the surface of TiO2 film. The optical characteristics of the extracted dye and photovoltaic performance of the cells were studied. The extracts showed UV–vis absorptions in the range of 530–560 nm with broad maxima absorption at ~ 430 nm. FTIR spectra of extraction revealed the presence of anchoring groups. For E. conferta, the photovoltaic performance of the sample with 3.16-μm-thick TiO2 produced the best results with open-circuit voltage (VOC), short-circuit current density (JSC), fill factor (FF), and energy conversion efficiency (ɳ) values of 0.37 V, 6.56 mA/cm2, 0.49, and 1.18%, respectively. The best photovoltaic performance for G. atroviridis was also obtained from the sample with 3.16-μm-thick TiO2 with VOC, JSC, FF, and ɳ values of 0.35 V, 3.74 mA/cm2, 0.65, and 0.85%, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Research on dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have drawn much attention in recent years, mainly due to their low manufacturing cost, easy fabrication, and relatively high-energy conversion efficiency (ɳ) [1, 2]. The DSSC consists of a metal oxide semiconductor as a photo anode, a dye sensitizer, an electrolyte, and a counter electrode [3]. In DSSC, the photo excitation of the dye sensitizer is followed by injection of electrons into the conduction band of the semiconductor. The dye molecule is self-regenerated by redox system at the counter electrode by electrons passing through the load [4]. The optimization of each component in DSSC is essential to achieve maximum efficiency.
In conventional DSSC, ruthenium (Ru) complex is the most efficient sensitizer for the sensitization of nanocrystalline TiO2 semiconductor. However, the high cost and long-term unavailability of Ru complexes pushed many researchers to discover other cost-efficient sensitizers. The preparation of synthetic dyes also requires complicated procedures, organic solvent demands, and has low yield issues [5, 6]. Therefore, various investigations on easily available dyes extracted from natural sources that can be used as photosensitizers were conducted due to their large absorption coefficients, high light harvesting efficiency, low cost, easy preparation, and environmental friendliness [7,8,9]. The natural pigments are found in the shoot and root systems of plants such as flowers, leaves, fruits, stems, and roots. Several natural dye pigments, such as chlorophyll, betanins, carotenoids, anthocyanins, and tannins, are successfully used as sensitizers in DSSC application [10,11,12]. As reported by Wongcharee et al. [13], power conversion efficiency of DSSC using dyes extracted from blue pea, rosella, and mixture of both were 0.37, 0.05, and 0.15%, respectively. DSSC fabricated by dyes extracted from ivy gourd fruits and red frangipani flowers were reported to reach an efficiency of 0.08 and 0.30%, respectively [12]. DSSCs fabricated using extracts from Nerium oleander (red pink), buogainvillea (dark pink), and hibiscus (red) were found to give conversion efficiency of 0.06, 0.05, and 0.19%, respectively [14]. Anthocyanins are the most important vascular pigments, belonging to the class of compounds named flavonoids [15]. The anthocyanins are responsible for the bright orange, pink, red, purple, and blue colors in some plant flowers and fruit, depending on the pH [16]. The hydroxyl and carbonyl groups present in the anthocyanin molecules [17] can be bound to the surface of porous TiO2 film, as shown in Fig. 1. This enhances the feasibility of electron transfer from the anthocyanin molecule to the conduction band of TiO2 [18]. To achieve higher efficiency, the natural dyes must bind strongly to the TiO2 surface by means of their anchoring group to ensure efficient electron injection into the conduction band of TiO2 [19]. The performance of natural dyes that contain anthocyanin pigment as sensitizers were evaluated by short-circuit current (JSC), open-circuit voltage (VOC), and energy conversion efficiency (ɳ) as is normally done by other researchers and is summarized as in Table 1.
The performance of two types of tropical fruits, i.e., Eleiodoxa conferta and Garcinia atroviridis that are also known as asam kelubi and asam gelugur, respectively, in Malaysia, as sensitizers have never been reported. E. conferta contains oxalic, ascorbic, and malic acids [35]. It is reported that the highest concentration of oxalic acid (1.33 g/ml−1) can be obtained from young fruits compared to mature stage (1.26 g ml−1) and ripe stage (1.23 g ml−1). Meanwhile, G. atroviridis fruit is containing citric, tartaric, malic, and ascorbic acids. Therefore, the selection of both E. conferta and G. atroviridis fruit is due to their raw natural dye extract that should perform better with the presence of natural extracts like organic acids and alcohols which behave as co-absorbate [23]. These suppress recombination of dye with electrolyte, favoring charge injection and reducing dye aggregation [36].
In this present work, E. conferta and G. atroviridis were extracted and used as a sensitizer for DSSC without further purification. The extracted dyes were characterized by ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The photovoltaic performance (VOC, JSC, FF, and ɳ) of the fabricated DSSC was investigated using these extracts as sensitizers.
Materials and methods
Preparation of TiO2 electrode
TiO2 paste was prepared by blending 20 g of commercial TiO2 nanocrystalline powder (Degussa P25) which was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich with 20 ml of ethanol and 3 ml of 0.1 M acetic acid until a thick paste was formed. Fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) conductive glass with a sheet resistance of ~ 7 Ω/cm2 was cleaned in a detergent solution, rinsed using deionized water and ethanol, and then dried. The conductive site of the FTO conductive glass was identified using digital multimeter (All-Sun EM420B digital multimeter). TiO2 films in thicknesses of 1.83, 3.16, and 7.60 μm (as measured by FESEM) were obtained by taping 1-, 2-, and 3-layer thick adhesive tape, respectively, onto the conductive site in order to control the thickness. The TiO2 paste was coated onto the FTO substrate using the doctor blade technique and sintered at 450 °C for 30 min.
Preparation of natural dye sensitizers
The flesh of E. conferta and G. atroviridis, as shown in Fig. 2, were separated from the seeds and completely dried at room temperature. The flesh was crushed to powder form using a mortar. In total, 50 g of the powder was put into a beaker and added with 500 ml ethanol (1:10) and stirred. The mixture was left for 24 h in the dark at room temperature. The solid residues of the mixture were filtered out to obtain a pure and clear natural dye solution.
Preparation of counter electrode
Carbon black was mixed with TiO2 using the solid-state method as the counter electrode with weight ratio of 5:1 for TiO2/carbon black. The homogeneous carbon black paste was prepared by mixing the mixture (TiO2/carbon black) with 0.1 ml of Triton X-100 for 3 h. The conducting side of FTO glass was coated with 10 mM H2PtCl6 solution in ethanol, and the mixed paste was applied onto FTO glass using the doctor blade technique and sintered at 500 °C for 1 h.
Assembly of DSSC
The TiO2-coated glass was obtained by immersing the films into the natural dye (E. conferta and G. atroviridis, respectively) for 24 h at room temperature. The sensitized electrodes were rinsed using ethanol to remove any unanchored dye. A drop of redox electrolyte (Iodolyte HI-30 with a concentration of 30 mM (Solaronix) and acetonitrile as solvent) was cast on the surface of sensitized photoanodes. The counter electrode was then clipped onto the top of TiO2 working electrode with a cell active area of 6.5 cm2 and then sealed using slurry tape.
Cell characterization
UV–vis (HP 8453) was used to determine the absorption spectra of all samples. The FTIR spectra of dye extracts and dye-adsorbed TiO2 films were measured using a Shimadzu FTIR spectrometer (IRAffinity-1) in the wave number range of 4000–500 cm−1 with a maximum resolution of 0.5 cm−1. The thickness of the sample was observed using field emission scanning electron microscopes (FESEM) (Zeiss Supra 35VP). The photocurrent–voltage (I–V) curves of the DSSCs were recorded with a computer-controlled digital source meter (Keithley 2400) under an irradiation exposure of 100 mWcm−2.
Results and discussion
XRD analysis
Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns of the pure TiO2. The peaks indicate that the complete anatase structure (ICDD file no. 98-007-6028). The crystallite size was measured as per Scherer’s equation, where the average crystallite size of pure TiO2 is 8.51 nm [37].
FTIR spectra
The FTIR spectroscopy of pure and natural dye-sensitized TiO2 nanoparticles is shown in Fig. 4. Both spectra have the characteristic vibration of Ti–O bond at 659 cm−1 (in pure) and 801 cm−1 (in natural sensitizers) which normally occurs in between the standard range of 450–1000 cm−1 [38]. The FTIR spectrums obtained from E. conferta and G. atroviridis are shown in Fig. 4b which demonstrates the presence of anthocyanin as all the characteristic peaks are matched to other similar research works [20, 23, 39]. The anthocyanin pigments were observed based on strong peak absorption in the range of 3000–3600 cm−1 with wide and strong bands at 3336 and 3342 cm−1 for E. conferta and G. atroviridis, respectively. The peaks correspond to the –OH stretching vibration for the anthocyanin dye of E. conferta and G. atroviridis. Both samples show peaks at 2974 and 2884 cm−1 which corresponds to the –CH stretching modes that prove the presence of aromatic CH group. The broad absorption at 2078 cm−1 indicates further electron delocalization into adjacent rings [13]. The C=O group stretching vibrations occur at 1741 cm−1. Since this group can also conjugate with ring double bonds, there is a strong stretching vibration at 1643 cm−1 due to C=C aromatic ring stretching vibrations. The peaks at 1380 and 1381 cm−1 for E. conferta and G. atroviridis, respectively, were assigned to the asymmetric –CH deformation modes of CH3 group. The peaks at 1087 and 1046 cm−1 could be attributed to C–O vibrations. Based on FTIR results, it is confirmed that the presence of hydroxyl (−OH) and carbonyl (C=O) groups in the molecular structure of anthocyanin dye can possibly bind with the surface of porous TiO2 film. These bonds can be either monodentate or bidentate bridging. When illuminated, anthocyanin will absorb the light and electrons that are present when the HOMO state gets excited into the LUMO state. Therefore, electron injection takes place through the functional C=O and –OH groups into the conduction bands of TiO2.
UV–vis absorption
Figure 5 shows the absorption spectrum of pure TiO2 and TiO2 films adsorbed by (i) E. conferta and (ii) G. atroviridis dye solutions, respectively. The UV–vis absorption spectrum of pure TiO2 nanoparticles shown in Fig. 5a indicated that the TiO2 nanoparticles absorb light photons in UV and nearby regions only. Therefore, a separate dye sensitizer attached with TiO2 is needed to ensure it is suitable for solar cell applications [40]. The absorption spectrum of natural dye-sensitized TiO2 in Fig. 5b shows the enhancement of light photon absorption and extension of absorption region as compared to pure TiO2. The visible absorption band shifts to higher energy levels, showing a broad maximum around 530–560 nm with maximum absorption at 540 nm for E. conferta. Meanwhile, the absorption peaks were observed to be between 540 and 550 nm with maximum absorption at 540 nm for G. atroviridis. The spectrum obtained between 530 and 560 nm confirms the extraction of anthocyanin (cyaniding derivatives) [41]. Anthocyanin is an important composition of some natural dyes and is often found in fruits, flowers, and leaves of plants. Due to its color which ranges from red to blue, it is prospected to become an efficient sensitizer for wide band gap semiconductors [39]. The broad absorption of E. conferta may result in absorption in photon energy at broader wavelengths which results in the generation of more photoelectrons [20]. The presence of hydroxyl and carbonyl groups in anthocyanin molecules allows it to easily bind with the surface of TiO2 porous film; this is why it is suited for the application as sensitizers [42].
Photovoltaic performance
Figure 6 shows the variation of the current–voltage (J-V) curve of G. atroviridis and E. conferta-based DSSCs, and Table 2 shows the performance of the natural dyes as sensitizers in DSSCs evaluated by JSC, VOC, FF, and ɳ. E. conferta extracts produced promising photo electrochemical performance showing JSC = 4.63 mA/cm2, VOC = 0.37 V, FF = 0.56, and ɳ = 1.00%. This is due to the presence of anthocyanin in the extract. With the help of anthocyanin, the extract sticks onto the oxide surface and increases its light harvesting ability. G. atroviridis extract has less efficiency values compared to E. conferta because of the low interaction between the extract and TiO2 film. Based on Table 2, cells fabricated with E. conferta extract achieved highest power conversion efficiencies with maximum photocurrent, 4.63 mA/cm2. Natural extracts produced low VOC due to possible efficient electron/dye cation recombination pathways and the acidic dye adsorption environment [43]. The H+ ions are potential determining ions for TiO2, and proton adsorption causes a positive shift of the Fermi level of the TiO2, thus limiting the maximum photovoltage that could be delivered by the cells.
Photovoltaic performance with different thicknesses of TiO2 layers
Figure 7 shows FESEM images of the different thicknesses of TiO2 layered onto FTO glass. In Fig. 6, 1.83 μm represents one layer of adhesive tape, 3.16 μm represents two layers of adhesive tape, and 7.60 μm represents three layers of adhesive tape. E. conferta and G. atroviridis used with the different thicknesses of TiO2 layers indicated different photovoltaic performances, as shown in Figs. 8 and 9.
Figure 8 indicates that 3.16-μm-thick TiO2 gave the highest result of 6.56 mA/cm2 followed by TiO2 7.60 and 1.83 μm in thickness which gave results of 5.83 and 4.63 mA/cm2, respectively. In Fig. 9, the TiO2 3.16 μm in thickness also provides the highest result which is 3.74 mA/cm2, followed by the TiO2 1.83 μm and 7.60 μm in thickness which provided 2.55 and 1.82 mA/cm2, respectively. The photovoltaic performances of DSSC prepared with different thickness layers of TiO2 are given in Tables 3 and 4 for E. conferta and G. atroviridis, respectively. Table 3 shows that the DSSC sensitized with 3.16-μm-thick TiO2 achieved VOC = 0.37 V, FF = 0.49, and ɳ = 1.18% which is higher compared to TiO2 1.83 and 7.60 μm in thickness. Meanwhile, for Table 4, the DSSC using 3.16-μm-thick TiO2 achieved VOC = 0.35 V, FF = 0.65, and ɳ = 0.85%. These results indicate that the efficiency of DSSC also depends on the thickness of TiO2 together with the types of sensitizers used. The enhancement in photocurrent with different thicknesses of TiO2 is due to the inherent energy barrier that leads to decrease in recombination of the electron [44].
The thickness of TiO2 affects the photovoltaic performance of DSSC because TiO2 is necessary in DSSC as it acts as an electron carrier after the electron was excited by the dye sensitizer when photon was absorbed. The increase in carrier amount as the thickness increases or when it reaches optimum thickness will increase the efficiency of the excitation-recombination process of the electrons which in turn results in increased output [45]. Generally, the DSSC efficiency performance that is dependent on TiO2 thickness is directly proportional to the increase in TiO2 layer, thereby leading to an increase in absorbed photons which increases the amount of generated electrons [46]. Nevertheless, the increase in TiO2 thickness increases the excitation-recombination process of electrons which may cause competition between rates of electron excitation and the recombination. Thus, this might help in determining the optimum thickness of TiO2 for each extraction as the efficiency in DSSC performance begins to decrease.
Comparison of photovoltaic performances for 3.16-μm-thick TiO2 layer
Table 5 presents photovoltaic DSSC parameters that were obtained from different dye extractions, E. conferta and G. atroviridis, and 3.16 μm thickness of TiO2. Their ɳ are 1.18 and 0.85%, respectively. Extraction using E. conferta produced higher results compared to G. atroviridis; this is related to the anthocyanin bound to TiO2 surface due to the reduction in undesirable contamination components in the dye matrix [47].
The ɳ from natural dye extraction produces lower efficiencies compared to synthetic dyes (N719). This is due to the molecular structure of natural dye, the anchoring group in the natural dye (interaction dye with TiO2), and its stability. In natural dye, long chain structure with R groups such as xanthophylls hinders the bonding of the pigment with the oxide surface of TiO2 [48]. Therefore, it prevents the dye molecules from becoming arrayed effectively on the TiO2 film. Hence, there is a lack of electron transfer from the dye molecules to the conduction band of TiO2 [49]. An improved efficiency using E. conferta is due to the presence of anthocyanin which helps to create a suitable bond on the surface of TiO2. In order to improve η, modification of photoanode and counter electrode will help to improve the efficiency using natural dye extract.
Conclusions
The extracts obtained from E. conferta and G. atroviridis were used as sensitizers in TiO2 photoanode. The FTIR spectra of E. conferta and G. atroviridis confirmed the presence of –OH and C=O groups in the molecular structure of anthocyanin dye which means that it can be bound to the surface of porous TiO2 film. The broad absorption of E. conferta may have resulted in absorption in photon energy at broader wavelengths, bringing about the generation of more photoelectrons, compared to G. atroviridis, affecting the photovoltaic performance. E. conferta indicated the highest photovoltaic performance compared to G. atroviridis using 3.16-μm-thick TiO2 layer. E. conferta produced 1.18% of ɳ with VOC, JSC, and FF values of 0.37 V, 6.56 mA/cm2, and 0.49, respectively.
References
Wang Y (2009) Recent research progress on polymer electrolytes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 93:1167–1175. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2009.01.009
Cheng X, Liang M, Sun S, Shi Y, Ma Z, Sun Z, Xue S (2012) Synthesis and photovoltaic properties of organic sensitizers containing electron-deficient and electron-rich fused thiophene for dye-sensitized solar cells. Tetrahedron 68:5375–5385. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2012.04.113
Kim HJ, Kim DE (2012) Effect of surface roughness of top cover layer on the efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cell. Sol Energy 86:2049–2055. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2012.04.007
Hao S, Wu J, Huang Y, Lin J (2006) Natural dyes as photosensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cell. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 80:209–214. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2005.05.009
Hamadanian M, Safaei-Ghomi J, Hosseinpour M, Masoomi R, Jabbari V (2014) Uses of new natural dye photosensitizers in fabrication of high potential dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Mater Sci Semicond Process 27:733–739. doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2014.08.017
Isah KU, Ahmadu U, Idris A, Kimpa MI, Uno UE, Ndamitso MM, Alu N (2015) Betalain pigments as natural photosensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells: the effect of dye pH on the photoelectric parameters. Mater Renew Sustain Energy 4:39. doi:10.1007/s40243-014- 0039-0
Zhou H, Wu L, Gao Y, Ma T (2011) Dye-sensitized solar cell using 20 natural dyes as sensitizers. Photochem Photobiol A Chem 219:188–194 doi.org/10.1016/j.jpotochem.2011.02.008
Shahid M, Shahid-ul-Islam MF (2013) Recent advancements in natural dye applications: a review. J Clean Prod 53:310–331. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.031
Calogero G, Bartolotta A, DI Marco G, Di Carlo A, Bonaccorso F (2015) Vegetable-based dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem Soc Rev 44:3244–3294. doi:10.1039/c4cs00309h
Kay A, Gratzel M (1993) Artificial photosynthesis. 1. Photosensitization of titania solar cells with chlorophyll derivatives and related natural porphyrins. J Phys Chem 97:6272–6277. doi:10.1021/j100125a029
Calogero G, Yum JH, Sinopoli A, DI Marco G, Gratzel M (2021) Anthocyanins and betalains as light-harvesting pigments for dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol Energy 86:1563–1575. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2012.02.018
Shanmugam V, Manoharan S, Anandan S (2013) Performance of dye-sensitized solar cells fabricated with extracts from fruits of ivy gourd and flowers of red frangipani as sensitizers. Spectrochim Acta Mol Biomol Spectrosc 104:35–40. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2012.11.098
Wongcharee K, Meeyoo V, Chavadej S (2007) Dye-sensitized solar cell using natural dyes extracted from rosella and blue pea flowers. Sol Energ Mat Sol Cells 91:566–571. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2006.11.005
Mary Rosana NT, Amarnath JD, Vincent Joseph KL, Suresh A, Anandan S, Saritha G (2014) Natural sensitizers for dye sensitized solar cell applications. Int J Chem Tech Res 6:5022–5026
Szostak R, de Souza ECF, Antunes SRM, Borges CPF, Andrade A, Rodrirues P, Antunes A (2015) Anthocyanin from Vitis labrusca grape used as sensitizer in DSSC solar cells. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 26:2257–2262. doi:10.1007/s10854-015-2678-z
Raghvendra SV, Shakya A, Hedaytullah M, Arya GS, Mishra A, Grupta AD, Pachpute AP, Patel D (2011) Chemical and potential aspects of anthocyanins-a water-soluble vacuolar flavonoid pigments: a review. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res 6:28–33
Sakata K, Saito N, Honda T (2006) Ab initio study of molecular structures and excited states in anthocyanidins. Tetrahedron 62:3721–3731. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2006.01.081
Calogero G, Citro I, DI Marco G, Minicante SA, Morabito M, Genovese G (2014) Brown seaweed pigment as a dye source for photoelectrochemical solar cells. Spectrochim Acta A 117:702–706. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2013.09.019
Ramamoorthy R, Radha N, Maheswari G (2016) Betalain and anthocyanin dye-sensitized solar cells. J Appl Electrochem 46:929–941. doi:10.1007/s10800-016-0974-9
Hemalatha KV, Karthick SN, Justin Raj C, Hong NY, Kim SK, Kim HJ (2012) Performance of Kerria japonica and Rosa chinensis flower dyes as sensitizers for dye sensitized solar cells. Spectrochim Acta Mol Biomol Spectrosc 96:305–309. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2012.05.027
Kimura Y, Maeda T, Iuchi S, Koga N, Murata Y, Wakamiya A, Yoshida K (2017) Characterization of dye-sensitized solar cells using five pure anthocyanidin 3-O-glucosides possessing different chromophores. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 335:230–238. doi:10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.12.005
Maurya IC, Neetu GAK (2016) Natural dye extracted from Saraca asoca flowers as sensitizer for TiO2-based dye-sensitized solar cell. J Sol Energy Eng 138:1–6. doi:10.1115/1.4034028
Maurya IC, Neetu, Gupta AK (2016) Callindra haematocephata and Peltophorum pterocarpum flowers as natural sensitizers for TiO2 thin film based dye-sensitized solar cells. Opt Mater 60:270–276. doi:10.1016/j.optmat.2016.07.041
Lim A, Kumara NT, Tan AL, Mirza AH, Chandrakanthi RL, Petra MI, Ming LC, Senadeera GK, Ekanayake P (2015) Potential natural sensitizers extracted from the skin of Canarium odontophyllum fruits for dye-sensitized solar cells. Spectrochim Acta A 138:596–602. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2014.11.102
Zhou H, Wu L, Gao Y, Ma T (2011) Dye-sensitized solar cells using 20 natural dyes as sensitizers. J Photochem Photobiol A 219:188–194. doi:10.1016/j.jphotochem.2011.02.008
Hao S, Wu J, Huang Y, Lin J (2006) Natural dyes as photosensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cell. Sol Energy 80:209–214. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2005.05.009
Fernando JMRV, Senadeera GKR (2008) Natural anthocyanins as photosensitizers for dye-sensitized solar devices. Curr Sci 95:663–666
Ghann W, Kang H, Sheikh T, Yadav S, Chavez-Gil T, Nesbitt F, Uddin J (2017) Fabrication, optimization and characterization of natural dye sensitized solar cell. Sci Rep 7:41470. doi:10.1038/srep41470
Hosseinnezhad M, Moradian S, Gharanjig K (2015) Fruit extract dyes as photosensitizers in solar cells. Curr Sci 109:954–956. doi:10.18520/v109/i5/953-956
Dumbrava A, Georgescu A, Badea G, Enache I, Orrea C, Girtu MA (2008) Dye sensitized solar cells based on nanocrystalline TiO2 and natural pigments. J Optoelectron Adv Mater 10:2996–3002
Chien CY, Hsu BD (2013) Optimization of the dye-sensitized solar cell with anthocyanin as photosensitizer. Sol Energy 98:203–211. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2013.09.035
Chang H, Lo YJ (2010) Pomegranate leaves and mulberry fruit as natural sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol Energy 84:1833–1837. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2010.07.009
Aduloju KA, Mohamed BS, Simiyu J (2011) Effect of extracting solvents on the stability and performances of dye-sensitized solar cell prepared using extract from Lawsonia inermis. Fundam J Mod Phys 1:261–268
Tekerek S, Kudret A, Alver U (2011) Dye-sensitized solar cells fabricated with black raspberry, black carrot and rosella juice. Indian J Phys 85:1469–1476. doi:10.1007/s12648-011-0166-8
Mokhtar SI, Aziz NA (2015) Organic acid content and antimicrobial properties of Eleiodoxa conferta extracts at different maturity stages. J Trop Resour Sustain Sci 3:72–76
Calogero G, DI Marco G, Cazzanti S, Caramori S, Argazzi R, Carlo AD, Bignozzi CA (2010) Efficient dye-sensitized solar cells using red turnip and purple wild Sicilian prickly pear fruits. Int J Mol Sci 11:254–267. doi:10.3390/ijms11010254
Jaafar H, Ahmad ZA, Ain MF (2017) Effect of Nb-doped TiO2 photoanode using solid state method with E. conferta as sensitizer on the performance of dye sensitized solar cell. Optik 144:91–101. doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.06.097
Li B, Wang X, Yan M, Li L (2002) Preparation and characterization of nano-TiO2 powder. MaterChemPhys 78:184–188
Mozaffari SA, Saeidi M, Rahmanian R (2015) Photoelectric characterization of fabricated dye sensitized solar cell using dye extracted from red Siahkooti fruit as natural sensitizer. Spectrochim Acta Mol Biomol Spectrosc 142:226–231. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2015.02.003
Ananth S, Vivek P, Saravana Kumar G, Murugakoothan P (2015) Performance of Caesalpinia sappan heartwood extract as photo sensitizer for dye sensitized solar cells. Spectrochim Acta Mol Biomol Spectrosc 137:345–350. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2014.08.083
Harborne JB, Geissman TA (1956) Anthochlor pigments. XII. Maritimein and marein. J Am Chem Soc 78:829–832
Tripathi M, Chawla P (2015) CeO2-TiO2 photoanode for solid state natural dye-sensitized solar cell. Ionics 21:541–546. doi:10.1007/s11581-014-1172-6
Su H, Huang YT, Chang YH (2015) The synthesis of Nb-doped TiO2 nanoparticles for improved-performance dye sensitized solar cells. Electrochim Acta 182:230–237. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.072
Baglio V, Girolam M, Antonucci V (2011) Influence of TiO2 film thickness on the electrochemical behaviour of dye-sensitized solar cells. Int J Electrochem Sci 6:3375–3384
D'Souza LP, Shwetharani R, Amoli V, Fernando CAN, Sinha AK, Balakrishna RG (2016) Photoexcitation of neodymium doped TiO2 for improved performance in dye-sensitized solar cells. Mater Des 104:346–354. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.007
Fitra M, Daut I, Irwanto M (2013) Effect of TiO2 thickness dye solar cell on charge generation. Energy Procedia 36:278–286. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.032
Singh LK, Karlo T, Pandey A (2014) Performance of fruit extract of Melastoma malabathricum L. as sensitizer in DSSCs. Spectrochim Acta Mol Biomol Spectrosc 118:938–943. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2013.09.075
Zhang D, Lanier SM, Downing JA (2008) Betalain, pigments for dye-sensitized solar cells. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 195:72–80. doi:10.1016/j.jphotochem.2007.07.038
Narayan MR (2012) Review: dye sensitized solar cells based on natural photosensitizers, renew. Sustainable Energy Rev 16:208–215. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.148
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by fundamental research grant scheme (FRGS) under grant number of 203/PBAHAN/6071263.
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaafar, H., Ain, M.F. & Ahmad, Z.A. Performance of E. conferta and G. atroviridis fruit extracts as sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Ionics 24, 891–899 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-017-2244-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-017-2244-1