Introduction

Nickel-rich cathode material LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 is one of the most applicable cathode materials for advanced lithium ion batteries (LIBs). It has been widely used as power source for electric vehicles (EVs), hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), due to its high energy, power density, and lower price [14]. However, there are some shortcomings, such as rapid capacity fading especially due to chemical instability of abundant Ni3+ and Ni4+ ions and its instability of structure at highly delithiated status and elevated temperature [58]. The appearance of abundant Ni4+ ions aggravates the side reaction between electrode and electrolyte, increases the impedance because of formation of solid electrolyte interface (SEI) layer, and lowers the cycling performance of LIBs [911]. In addition, LiOH impurities form on the surface of nickel-rich cathode material, react with LiPF6 electrolyte, and yield HF which dissolves metal ions [1214].

Many studies have indicated that it is a promising approach to improve the thermal stability and cycling stability of cathode materials of the nickel (Ni)-rich cathode material by coating of various materials. These coating materials can (i) act as a physical barrier, provide coated materials from HF attack, and thus reduce metal dissolution from the active materials to improve the surface stability of coated material; (ii) reduce side reactions between the electrode and the electrolyte; and (iii) enhance the capacity and electronic conductivity for some active coating materials [15]. For layered cathodes, metal oxides (SiO2 [16], ZrO2 [17, 18], and TiO2 [19, 20]), metal fluorides (AlF3 [21]), and metal phosphates (AlPO4 and Co3(PO4)2 [22]) are suggested as suitable coating materials. For much cheaper price and more stable physical properties, Al2O3 coatings have been reported widely in previous references [12, 23, 24].

In this paper, Al2O3 was coated on LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cathode material via a heterogeneous nucleation-and-growth process [2528] successfully. It is found that the cycling performance of Al2O3-coated cathode material was highly improved at high current intensity. In addition, the physical and electrochemical characterizations of the coated samples are discussed.

Experimental

Preparation of Al2O3-coated samples

LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 was synthesized by co-precipitation method [29] as both the base material for coating and uncoated reference material. To prepare Al2O3-coated samples, LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 powders were dispersed in aluminum isopropoxide ethanol solution with stirring vigorously for 5 h and evaporated at 60 °C subsequently to remove ethanol. The mixture was exposed in air with hydrolysis of aluminum isopropoxide to form film of gel on the surface of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 particles. And then particles were heated in air at 500 °C for 3 h in Muffle oven to obtain the Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 materials. Amounts of Al2O3 were in the range 0.5 to 2 wt.%, and we denote the coating amounts of 0.5, 1, and 2 wt% as Al2O3-05, Al2O3-10, and Al2O3-20 respectively.

Physical characterization

The crystal structures of the samples were identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu Kα radiation (ULTIMA-3, Rigaku, Japan), operated at 40 kV and 40 mA. The morphology and size of the samples was observed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy equipped with an EDXS energy disperse X-ray spectrometer (FESEM, Ultra55, Zeiss, Germany). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100, JEOL) was taken to observe the coating layer. The quantitative atomic compositions and element valence of Al2O3-coated samples were determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-Alpha, Thermo Scientific, UK).

Electrochemical measurements

The cathode materials were mixed with acetylene black and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) with a weight ratio of 80:10:10 in n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP). The slurry was coated on Al foil and dried in vacuum oven at 120 °C for 8 h. And then, the coin-type cell (CR2032) was assembled in a glove box (MBRAUN, Germany) filled with Ar, using lithium foil as the counter electrode, Celgard 2300 as the separator, and 1 M LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate (1:1) as the electrolyte. The electrochemical performances were evaluated by electrochemical test instrument (Maccor S4000, USA) at different current densities in a voltage range of 2.8–4.5 V. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurement was carried out using an electrochemical workstation (Solartron 1287, USA) over a frequency range from 10 mHz to 100 kHz with a 5-mV voltage vibration in order to detect the cell resistances at different cycle stages.

Result and discussion

XRD patterns and Miller indices of the uncoated and Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 material are shown in Fig. 1. The crystal structure of the samples and all the diffraction peaks are in good agreement with the patterns of LiNiO2 (JCPDS No. 74-0919) which reveals a single phase of α-NaFeO2 structure with space group of R-3 m. Calculated by software Jade, the average crystal lattice constants are a = 0.2868 nm, c = 1.4177 nm for the uncoated sample with only a slight increase in the crystal constants, compared with a = 0.2868 nm, c = 1.4186 nm for the coated one. All these results suggest that the crystal structure of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 is not affected by coating. The splitting of the (006)/ (012) and (108)/ (110) peaks as well as the integrated ratios of I (003)/I (104) > 1.2 indicate the well-ordered α-NaFeO2 structure with the limited cation mixing for both the bare and coated samples [30]. It can be indicated that the coating layer was nicely formed through a heterogeneous nucleation-and-growth process.

Fig. 1
figure 1

XRD patterns of the uncoated and Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2: uncoated (a), Al2O3-05 (b), Al2O3-10 (c), and Al2O3-20 (d)

In order to clarify the oxidation state of Al in the Al2O3-coated samples, XPS analysis was performed at room temperature. XPS analysis of the coated sample (Al2O3-10) was carried out, and the Al2p XPS spectrum is given in Fig. 2. In this figure, the observed binding energy of the Al2p is 72.0 eV, which is very close to the values of 72.9 eV for Al2O3 (1999 XPS International, Inc.). This result shows that the Al element on the material surface is trivalent.

Fig. 2
figure 2

XPS spectrum of Al2p taken from the surface of Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 (Al2O3-10)

The surface morphologies of the uncoated and Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 samples observed by SEM are shown in Fig. 3a, b. There are obvious differences in surface morphologies between the uncoated and Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 samples. Plenty of nanometer primary particles are attached to the surface of secondary particles, as shown in Fig. 3a. After coating Al2O3 on the surface, primary particles of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 vanish with a few Al2O3 particles occurring indicating the Al2O3-coating layer is formed on the surface of the LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 samples. The average diameter of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 particles is 7 μm. Also, the distribution of the four elements is revealed by a mapping of a single Al2O3-coated particle (Fig. 3c). SEM-EDS spectrum (Fig. 3d) shows O, Ni, Co, and Al characteristic peaks. According to atomic percentages of Ni, Co, and Al, the weight percentages of Al2O3 coated on the particle is 0.96 wt%.

Fig. 3
figure 3

SEM micrograph of the uncoated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 (a), SEM micrograph of the 1 wt.% Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 (b), elemental mapping recorded from 1 wt.% Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 with corresponding mappings of different elements (c), and EDS pattern of 1 wt.% Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 (d)

Fine particles can provide nucleation centers, and can decrease the kinetic barrier to nucleation of a supersaturated solution. In this experiment, LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 was used as nucleation centers in a supersaturated alumina sol suspension, so alumina sol can form a homogeneous layer on LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cores by the heterogeneous nucleation-and-growth processing. Transmission electron micrographs of the uncoated and Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 powders (Al2O3-10) are shown in Fig. 4. By comparing morphology pictures of the uncoated samples with a clean and smooth surface in Fig. 4a, a thin and brighter coating layer is visually observed in Fig. 4b. It reveals that the thickness of coating layer is 7 nm approximately. Based on these facts, we confirm that a uniform surface coating of Al2O3 particles was successfully achieved.

Fig. 4
figure 4

TEM micrographs of the uncoated and Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2: uncoated (a) and Al2O3-10 (b)

Figure 5a shows initial charge–discharge curves of the Li/uncoated and Li/Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cells at a current density of 18 mA g−1 (0.1C) between 2.8 and 4.5 V. All the similar charge–discharge curves imply that no change of structure occurred through the process of Al2O3 coating. The initial discharge capacities of the uncoated and Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 materials (Al2O3-05, Al2O3-10, and Al2O3-20) are 202.83, 199.21, 189.86, and 184.70 mAh g−1, respectively. The capacities of the Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 materials are lower than those of the uncoated material, which are on account of the existence of the inactive Al2O3 coated on the surface. Although the inactive Al2O3 coated on the surface decreases the initial discharge capacities of cells, the cyclability of 1-wt.% Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cells increases at the current rate of 180 mA g−1 (1C) between 2.8 and 4.5 V at room temperature (25 °C) and elevated temperature (55 °C) as shown in Fig. 5b, c. The discharge capacity at 25 and 55 °C of the uncoated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 materials decreases from 185.78 to 102.76 mAh g−1 and 215.24 to 120.24 mAh g−1 at the rate of 1C after 100 cycles and shows a capacity retention rate of 55.3 and 55.8 %, respectively; 1-wt.% Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cells provide a higher capacity retention of 71.7 % (173.94 to 124.71 mAh g−1) and 70.1 % (193.06 to 135.34 mAh g−1) at 25 and 55 °C after the same cycles, by contrast; 0.5- and 2-wt.% Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cells show no improvements in electrochemical characters because the amounts of Al2O3 are too small and large. Too thin or thick coating layer will have no effect of protecting the anode or impede transmission of ions. This remarkable improvement is mainly due to the dense Al2O3 coated on the surface which acts as a physical barrier protecting coated materials from HF attack, reduces side reactions between the electrode and the electrolyte, and provides a more stable electrode/electrolyte interface. Besides, 1-wt.% Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cells also show better discharge capacity retentions during cycling at higher current densities (1C and 2C).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Electrochemical properties: initial charge/discharge curves of the uncoated and Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 at a current density of 18 mA g−1 (0.1C) over the voltage range of 2.8–4.5 V (a), cycle performance at the current rate of 1C at room temperature (25 °C) (b), cycle performance at the current rate of 1C at elevated temperature (55 °C) (c), and rate capability test of the Li/uncoated and Li/Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cells as a function of C rate (d)

The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurement was carried out after 50 charge–discharge cycles at 1C to elucidate changes in electrochemical performance after the Al2O3 coating. Nyquist plots of the uncoated and Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 electrodes are shown in Fig. 6. The semicircle in the high-to-medium frequency region is ascribed to the surface impedance (Rf) of Li+ diffusion in the surface layer; the other in the medium frequency region is assigned to the charge transfer resistance (Rct). [3133]. Equivalent circuit matches with the curve, and the values of solution resistance (Rs), surface resistance (Rf), and charge transfer resistance (Rct) are as listed in Table 1. The lower Rf and Rct are attributed to a more stable surface protected by Al2O3 coating which can suppress the increasing impedance and favor the lithium diffusion of the host oxide during the charge–discharge process [34].

Fig. 6
figure 6

Nyquist plots of the uncoated and Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 electrodes after 50 charge–discharge cycles

Table 1 Fitting values of the Rs, Rf, and Rct based on the equivalent circuit in Fig. 6

Conclusion

In this paper, Al2O3 was successfully coated on layered Ni-rich LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 material. A thin coating layer with 7 nm was formed on the surface. The Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 materials show improved cycling performance at the current rate of 1C over the voltage range of 2.8–4.5 V. This coating layer acts as a physical barrier protecting coated materials from HF attack, reduces side reactions between the electrode and the electrolyte, and forms a more stable SEI layer. Al2O3-coated LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 synthesized by a facile method with improved cycling performance presents great potential to be applied in the large-scale energy storage systems (ESSs).