Abstract
Meliolales (black mildews) is an order of plant parasitic ascomycetous fungi in the tropics and subtropics. They are frequently overgrown and parasitized by other fungi, known as hyperparasites. During the last few years, species of hyperparasitic fungi on Meliolales have been collected in Benin and Panama. A new species of Paranectria and seven new reports of hyperparasites of different systematic groups are presented here with detailed descriptions and illustrations, together with new data concerning fungal hosts and host plants. The new species is called Paranectria longiappendiculata, characterized by exceptionally long appendages carried by the ascospores. New records for Benin and Panama are Calloriopsis herpotricha, Dimerosporiella cephalosporii, Isthmospora glabra, Isthmospora trichophila, Malacaria meliolicola, Paranectriella hemileiae, and Paranectriella minuta. Calloriopsis herpotricha is recorded for Africa and D. cephalosporii and P. hemileiae for America for the first time, suggesting an apparently pantropical distribution. Findings show a blatant lack of investigation on hyperparasitic fungi in the tropics. The phylogenetic positions of three of these newly reported species, C. herpotricha, D. cephalosporii, and P. minuta, are shown based on the analysis of internal transcribed spacer (ITS), large subunit (LSU), and small subunit (SSU) rDNA sequences. These sequences were generated in the context of the present study for the first time.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Meliolales (Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota), commonly known as “black mildews”, form a large order of biotrophic, obligate plant parasitic fungi in the tropics and subtropics. Species of this order develop on leaves, petioles, twigs, and sometimes fruits of vascular plants (Piepenbring et al. 2011; Hongsanan et al. 2015; Zeng et al. 2017). Black mildews cause a reduction of chlorophyll, starch, sugar, proteins, and amino acids in the plant tissues they infect, as well as alterations in the photosynthetic and respiratory rates (Old et al. 2003).
Meliolales are frequently infected by hyperparasites (Hawksworth 1981; Gams et al. 2004). There are approximately 200 species of fungi reported to be hyperparasitic on colonies of Meliolales (Bermúdez-Cova et al. 2023), but we expect a much greater number of species to exist in the tropics. Fungal hyperparasites belong to diverse taxonomic groups, and therefore comprise species producing a high diversity of reproductive structures, such as apothecia, catathecia, perithecia, pycnidia, and synnemata, among others. They are generalists concerning genera of Meliolales, but many of these hyperparasites seem to be restricted only to meliolalean hosts (Bermúdez-Cova et al. 2022).
Knowledge of species diversity of black mildews in the tropics is still limited. Only three species are known for Benin and 105 for Panama (Piepenbring et al. 2011; Piepenbring et al. 2020; Hofmann and Piepenbring 2021). Information on hyperparasitic fungi of Meliolales in Benin and Panama is inexistent (Bermúdez-Cova et al. 2022). For a better understanding of the diversity, evolution, and biology of hyperparasitic fungi, it is necessary to increase sampling efforts and to undertake further morphological, molecular, and ecological studies.
Materials and methods
Sample collection and morphological characterization
Samples of leaves infected with black mildews were opportunistically collected in Western Panama from January to March 2020 and in Benin in February as well as September 2022. For the present study, colonies of Meliolales parasitized by hyperparasites were considered. Infected leaves were dried in a plant press and deposited in the herbarium at the Universidad Autónoma de Chiriquí (UCH, specimens from Panama) and in the mycological herbarium of the University of Parakou (UNIPAR) in Benin. If a given sample was large enough, a duplicate was deposited in the Botanische Staatssammlung München (M).
Dried specimens were observed by stereomicroscopy and by light microscopy. Measurements of at least 20 ascospores, conidia, and other structures have been made for each specimen at a magnification of × 600 and × 1000. Measurements are presented as mean value ± standard deviation with extreme values in parentheses. Line drawings were made freehand on scaled paper. Images and drawings were edited with Photoshop (Adobe, San Jose, California).
Host plant identification
Host plants were identified by morphological characteristics and in some cases by molecular sequence data. Morphological identifications were made by comparison with herbarium specimens, literature (e.g., Akoègninou et al. 2006; Condit et al. 2011), and with the help of local botanists. Molecular sequence data for species identifications were obtained by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the amplification of the partial region of chloroplast rbcL with the primer pairs rbcLa-F (Levin et al. 2003) and rbcLa-R (Kress et al. 2009). DNA was extracted from approx. 0.05 g of leaf tissue dried with silica gel using the innuPREP plant DNA kit (Analytik Jena, Germany) and following the manufacturer’s instructions. Protocols for PCR were carried out as described by Fazekas et al. (2012).
DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing of fungal DNA
DNA was isolated from the ascomata of dry specimens using the EZNA forensic DNA extraction kit, following the manufacturer’s instructions. To extract total genomic DNA, a small amount of clean ascomata were transferred into a sterile Eppendorf tube with approx. 200 μL of distilled water using sterilized tweezers, and trying to avoid picking cells of any other organism associated with the leaves and the colonies of black mildews. The samples were frozen for 24 h at − 20 °C and later homogenized for 10–12 min. using a Retsch mixer mill MM301 with TL buffer and 2.5-mm zirconia beads. Isolated DNA was re-suspended in elution buffer and stored at − 20 °C.
Two partial nuclear gene regions (ribosomal loci) were amplified and sequenced: For the large subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrLSU, 28S rDNA), the primers LSU1Fd and LSU3Rd (Crous et al. 2009), NL1 and NL4 (O'Donnell 1993), LR0R (Wagner and Ryvarden 2002), and LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990) were used. For small subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrSSU, 18S rDNA), the primers SSU1Fd and SSU3Rd (Crous et al. 2009) were used. For the internal transcribed spacer region of ribosomal DNA (ITS), the primers ITS5 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990) were used. The PCR mixtures consisted of 1 μL genomic DNA, 15 × MgCl2 reaction buffer (Bioline, Luckenwalde, Germany), 25 mM MgCl2, 25 μM of each dNTP, 10 μM of each primer, and 5 U Taq DNA polymerase (VWR) in a total volume of 30 μL. Cycling parameters of the PCR for ITS, LSU, and SSU were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of amplification [denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, primer annealing at 52 °C for 30 s and primer extension at 72 °C for 45 s], and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min, followed by storage at 8 °C. PCR products were checked on 1.5% agarose electrophoresis gels containing HDGreenPlus DNA stain. Amplified PCR products were purified with the Cycle Pure Kit (VWR-Omega, USA). Sequencing was performed at Seqlab GmbH, Germany.
Numerous attempts were made to obtain DNA sequence data of ITS, LSU, and SSU regions from all the specimens collected in the context of this study. Except for four specimens, these attempts failed.
Phylogenetic analyses
Consensus sequences of trace files were generated with Geneious 10.2.2 (https://www.geneious.com, Kearse et al. 2012) and searched against GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, Benson et al. 2014) with MegaBLAST. Ambiguous and miscalled bases were corrected, when possible, after examination of the corresponding chromatogram files. Sequences with a high similarity were aligned with MAFFT v. 7 using the L-INS-i algorithm (Nakamura et al. 2018). The alignments were manually checked by using MEGA v. 7 (Kumar et al. 2016). Gblocks v. 0.91b (Talavera and Castresana 2007) was used to remove poorly aligned positions and divergent regions from the DNA alignment. Phylogenetic analyses of this study were conducted by applying maximum likelihood (ML) in RAxML-HPC2 v.8.2.12 (Stamatakis 2014) on XSEDE (Miller et al. 2010) and Bayesian phylogenetic inference with the program MrBayes 3.2.6. (Ronquist et al. 2012) on XSEDE (Miller et al. 2010), available on the CIPRES Science Gateway web portal (http://www.phylo.org/sub_sections/portal/). The alignments and trees were deposited in TreeBASE (http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S30529).
Results
Apothecioid hyperparasites
Calloriopsis herpotricha (Berk.) R. Sant., Svensk bot. Tidskr. 45(1): 300, 1951 (Figs. 1 and 2).
≡ Peziza herpotricha Berk., Hooker’s J. Bot. Kew Gard. Misc. 3: 16, 1851.
≡ Helotiella herpotricha (Berk.) Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 8: 477, 1889.
= Calloria meliolicola P. Henn., Botanisch. Jahrb. 25: 509, 1898.
≡ Coryne meliolicola (P. Henn.) v. Höhnel, Sitzungsber. Kaiserl. Akad. Wiss., Math.-Naturwiss. Kl., Abt. 1. 118: 106, 1909.
= Peziza gelatinosa Ell. & Mart., Amer. Nat. 17: 1283, 1883.
≡ Orbilia gelatinosa Sacc., Syll. Fung. 8: 624, 1889.
≡ Coryne gelatinosa (Sacc.) Rehm, Ann. Mycol. 5: 518, 1907.
≡ Calloriopsis gelatinosa (Sacc.) Sydow, Ann. Mycol. 15: 254, 1917.
Colonies composed of white hyphae covering the colonies of Meliola sp. Hyphae thin-walled, septate, 2–3 μm, hyaline. Apothecia 400–600 μm diam., disc pale orange to orange when old, margin slightly paler, translucent. Gelatinous material present throughout the hymenium, sub-hymenium, ectal excipulum and medullary excipulum. The subhymenium is composed of tightly interwoven hyphae. The ectal excipulum is composed of septate parallel hyphae which are swollen at the tips. Asci clavate, thick-walled especially in young asci, 40–52 μm, 8-spored. Paraphyses filamentous, unbranched, 1–3 μm, sometimes swollen at the tip. Ascospores ellipsoid to fusoid, sometimes curved, (10–) 13–16 × 3–6 μm, mostly 1-septate, hyaline, smooth.
Anamorph – Not known.
Specimens examined – On Meliola sp. on living leaves of Coffea arabica, Benin, Atlantique, Attogon, Niaouli Forest, 6° 44′ 42″ N 2° 7′ 50″ E, 69 m, 28 February 2022, M.A. Bermúdez, A. Tabé, I. Agonglo, O.P. Agbani, N.S. Yorou, MB178; on Meliola sp. on living leaves of Coffea arabica, Benin, Atlantique, Attogon, Niaouli Forest, 6° 44′ 23″ N 2° 8′ 26″ E, 119 m a.s.l., 19 September 2022, A. Krauß, A. Tabé, O. Koukol, N.S. Yorou, AK4H (UNIPAR, M, GenBank accession number: OQ800930).
Known hosts and distribution – On Meliola sp. on living leaves of Persea palustris (Lauraceae) in the USA (Ellis and Martin 1883); on living leaves of an unknown plant host in Pará, Brazil (Hooker 1851; Saccardo 1889); on Meliola sp. on living leaves of Phragmites sp. (Poaceae) in Papua New Guinea (Hennings 1898); on Meliola ramosii on living leaves of Homonoia riparia (Euphorbiaceae) in the Philippines; on Perisporiaceae on living leaves of Scaevola sp. (Goodeniaceae) in Hawaii (Cash 1938); on Meliola sp. on living leaves of an unknown tree in the Philippines (Santesson 1951); on Meliola substenospora on living leaves of Phragmites sp. (Poaceae) in Java, Indonesia (Pfister 1976); on Meliola sp. on living leaves of herbs in Puerto Rico (Pfister 1976); without host data in Guadeloupe, France (Pfister 1976); on Meliola sp. on living leaves of Nyssa sp. (Nyssaceae) in the USA (Pfister 1976); on Meliola sp. on living leaves of Coffea arabica (Rubiaceae) in Benin (this study). C. arabica is a new host of C. herpotricha, and the hyperparasite and the species of Meliolales are new records for Benin. This is also the first record of C. herpotricha in Africa.
Illustrations – This species was illustrated by Pfister (1976).
Notes – Two species of apothecioid hyperparasitic fungi have been reported to parasitize Meliolales, namely, Calloriopsis herpotricha and Unguiculella meliolicola, both belonging to the Leotiomycetes (Phacidiales and Helotiales, respectively; Bermúdez-Cova et al. 2022). The monotypic genus Calloriopsis was proposed by Sydow and Sydow (1917) and is based on a parasitic discomycete which occurs on Meliola and related dark parasites. Calloriopsis herpotricha differs from other fungi of the Leotiomycetes by the parasitic habit and the gelatinous material that is present in all parts of the apothecium, including the hymenium (Pfister 1976; Baral and Marson 2001).
Sequence data – The SSU rDNA sequence obtained from fresh material of C. herpotricha (specimen AK4H) is 948 bp long. In the tree inferred from the analysis of SSU sequences of 14 specimens of Leotiomycetes and Lecanoromycetes (Fig. 1), the sequence of C. herpotricha is located within a strongly supported clade that comprises sequences of species of Lecanoromycetes which were obtained from lichenized fungi. Some lineages of non-lichenized Ascomycota are known to be derived from lichenized ancestors by the loss of the lichen symbiosis in favor of a saprotrophic, lichenicolous, or parasitic mode of nutrition (Lutzoni et al. 2001; Hawksworth 2015; Honegger 2022). Examples of these include non-lichenized members of Arthoniales (Arthoniomycetes) and Ostropales (Lecanoromycetes; Kendrick 2017). The foregoing and the fact that the sequences of the species of Calloriopsis clustered together with other sequences of species of Ostropales suggest that the genus Calloriopsis may belong to the Lecanoromycetes and not to the Leotiomycetes as previously assumed. A sequence for C. herpotricha is provided here for the first time.
Four sequences of an unidentified species of Calloriopsis are available in GenBank (accession numbers: MF322776, MF322774, OM103051, and OQ800930). The specimens that yielded these sequences were found on decayed twigs and branches of Cornus sanguinea L. (Cornaceae) and Fraxinus excelsior L. (Oleaceae) in Luxembourg (unpublished data provided by the herbarium LUX). These sequences also fall within the Lecanoromycetes. However, these sequences lack the SSU region; thus, it was not possible to compare them with the sequence of Calloriopsis herpotricha. We also obtained a DNA sequence of the ITS region of C. herpotricha (GenBank accession number: OR243608). This sequence presents 94% identity with the aforementioned sequences of Calloriopsis and other members of the Lecanoromycetes, confirming the systematic placement of C. herpotricha in the Lecanoromycetes.
Dematiaceous hyphomycetes
Isthmospora glabra F. Stevens, Bot. Gaz. 65(3): 244, 1918 (Fig. 3a–c).
Hyphae not evident, conidia in small pulverulent brownish heaps scattered over the colonies of Meliola sp. Conidiophores not found. Conidia are isthmospores, composed of 11–12 cells. Two pairs of subglobose thick-walled cells, each cell with rounded horns that are directed upwardly and inwardly, 5–6 × 4–5 μm, brown, smooth. These cells are connected by a central isthmus made of two cells. Connecting cells oblong with wedge-shaped ends, 3–4 μm diam., pale brown, smooth. On each side of the central cells, two to three flask-shaped cells extend upwardly and outwardly into a continuous cylindrical appendage, (15–)20–21(–24) × 1–2 μm, hyaline, smooth.
Teleomorph – Trichothyrium-like (according to Hughes 1953).
Specimen examined – On Appendiculella sororcula on living leaves of Calea pittieri, Panama, Chiriquí Province, David, Dolega district, Los Algarrobos, Majagua river trail, 8° 29′ 28″ N 82° 25′ 59″ W, approx. 150 m a.s.l., 29 December 2016, M. Piepenbring, A. Villarreal, E. Romero, V. Samudio, MP5326 (UCH10000).
Known hosts and distribution – On Meliola melastomacearum on living leaves of Clidemia hirta (Melastomataceae) in Puerto Rico; on Meliola bicornis on living leaves of Meibomia supina (Leguminosae) in Puerto Rico; on Meliola glabroides on living leaves of Nectandra patens (Lauraceae) and Simarouba tulae (Simaroubaceae) in Puerto Rico; on Meliola glabra on living leaves of unknown host in Puerto Rico (Stevens 1918); on Appendiculella sororcula on living leaves of Calea pittieri (Asteraceae) in Panama (this study). A. sororcula and C. pittieri are new hosts of I. glabra, and the hyperparasite is a new record for Panama.
Illustrations – This species was illustrated by Hughes (1953).
Notes – The genus Isthmospora (Microthyriaceae, Microthyriales) was proposed by Stevens (1918) and comprises two species of dematiaceous hyphomycetes with dark conidia consisting of two approximately equal halves connected by an isthmus. Both species of the genus, I. glabra and I. spinosa, are associated with colonies of black mildews (Damon 1953).
Isthmospora glabra is characterized by the presence of dark smooth central cells with large hyaline appendages (Stevens 1918; Hughes 1953). However, according to Damon (1953), this species is congeneric with Spegazzinia chandleri.
Isthmospora glabra has always been found on the hyphal mat of Trichothyrium reptans, a catathecioid hyperparasite of Meliolales. Therefore, I. glabra is considered to be the anamorphic stage of T. reptans (Hughes 1953). The specimen examined (MP5326) was also found together with a species of Trichothyrium (Fig. 3a, b); however, the size of the ascospores (10–12 × 4–6 μm) does not match with the size of ascospores of T. reptans (15–20 × 5–6.5 μm; Hughes 1953). There is no molecular evidence that supports the anamorph-teleomorph connection between these fungi.
Isthmospora trichophila (Atkinson) Damon, Bull. Torrey bot. Club 80: 160, 1953 (Fig. 3d–e).
≡ Spegazzinia trichophila G.F. Atk., Bull. Cornell Univ. 3(1): 49, 1897.
= Isthmospora spinosa F. Stevens, Bot. Gaz. 65(3): 244, 1918.
= Spegazzinia coffeae Henn., apud De Wildeman, Mission E. Laurent 3: 318, 1906.
= Spegazzinia meliolae Zimm., Cent. f. Bakt. II: 8: 221, 1902.
= Spegazzinia meliolicola Henn., Hedwigia 43: 398, 1904.
Hyphae not evident, conidia in small pulverulent brownish heaps scattered over the colonies of Meliola sp. Conidiophores erect, parallel, short, pale brown to brown. Conidia are isthmospores, composed of 11 cells: two pairs of subglobose cells, (14–)16–17(–23) × 11– 14(–19) μm, dark brown, echinulate, with spines up to 2 μm long. The cells are connected by a central isthmus made of three central cells that are oblong with wedge-shaped ends, 3–4 μm wide; there is a single central cell at the upper level and two cells resulting from a septation of another cell at the lower level. Two outer cells more or less oblong, 3–4 μm diam., hyaline, are attached on both sides of the central cells (one cell on each side). At the base of each outer cell a basal cell, 2–3 μm wide, hyaline, is attached.
Teleomorph – Trichothyrium-like (according to Hughes 1953).
Specimens examined – On Meliola sp. on living leaves of Xylopia frutescens, Panama, Chiriquí Province, Cochea, trail to Cochea river, 8° 32′ 36″ N 82° 23′ 03″ W, 181 m a.s.l., 26 February 2020, M.A. Bermúdez, A. Sanjur, A. Villarreal, MB109 (UCH); on Meliola sp. on living leaves of an unknown host plant, Panama, Chiriquí Province, David, Cuesta de Piedra, 8° 41′ 13″ N 82° 36′ 33″ W, 903 m a.s.l., 6 March 2020, M.A. Bermúdez, S. Samaniego, MB118 (UCH); on Meliola sp. on living leaves of Coffea arabica, Benin, Atlantique, Attogon, Niaouli Forest, 6° 44′ 42″ N 2° 7′ 50″ E, 69 m a.s.l., 28 February 2022, M.A. Bermúdez, A. Tabé, I. Agonglo, O.P. Agbani, N.S. Yorou, MB178; on Meliola sp. on living leaves of Coffea arabica, Benin, Atlantique, Attogon, Niaouli Forest, 6° 44′ 23″ N 2° 8′ 26″ E, 119 m a.s.l., 19 September 2022, A. Krauß, A. Tabé, N.S. Yorou, O. Koukol, AK4H (UNIPAR, M).
Known hosts and distribution – On Meliola anacardii on living leaves of Anacardium occidentale (Anacardiaceae) in Indonesia; on Meliola psidii on living leaves of Psidium guajava (Myrtaceae) in Brazil (Saccardo and Saccardo 1906); on Meliola sp. on living leaves of Coffea sp. (Rubiaceae) in Ubangi, tropical Africa (Saccardo and Trotter 1913); on Meliola psidii on living leaves of Psidium guajava (Myrtaceae) in Puerto Rico; on Meliola chiococcae on living leaves of Chiococca alba (Rubiaceae) in Puerto Rico; on Meliola byrsonimae on living leaves of Byrsonima lucida (Malpighiaceae) in Puerto Rico; on Meliola smilacis on living leaves of Smilax coriaceae (Smilacaceae) in Puerto Rico; on Meliola helleri on living leaves of Myrcia splendens (Myrtaceae) in Puerto Rico; on Meliola praetervisa on living leaves of Coccolobus sintenisii and Coccolobus pyrifolia (Polygonaceae) in Puerto Rico; on Meliola philodendri on living leaves of Philodendron krebsii (Araceae) in Puerto Rico (Stevens 1918); on Meliola sp. on living leaves of Xylopia frutescens (Annonaceae) in Panama (this study); on Meliola sp. on leaves of Coffea arabica (Rubiaceae) in Benin (this study). Coffea arabica and X. frutescens are new hosts of I. spinosa, and the hyperparasite is recorded here for Benin and Panama for the first time.
Illustrations – This species was illustrated by Hughes (1953), Damon (1953) and Tubaki (1963).
Notes – Isthmospora trichophila (Microthyriaceae, Microthyriales) is morphologically similar to species of Spegazzinia (Apiosporaceae, Sordariomycetes), and several known species are easily confused (Damon 1953). However, the complex morphology of the isthmospores and the association with species of Meliolales are strong features to distinguish I. trichophila from other species of dematiaceous hyphomycetes (Damon 1953; Hughes 1953).
Isthmospora trichophila has always been recorded growing on the hyphal mat of Trichothyrium asterophorum (Microthyriaceae, Microthyriales), a catathecioid hyperparasite of Meliolales; thus, it is considered to be the anamorphic stage of T. asterophorum (Hughes 1953). The specimens examined were also found together with a species of Trichothyrium, which could not be identified because it was not fertile. There is no molecular evidence that supports the anamorph-teleomorph connection between these two species of fungi.
Perithecioid hyperparasites
Dimerosporiella cephalosporii (Hansf.) Rossman & Samuels, Stud. Mycol. 42: 23, 1999 (Figs. 4, 5, and 6).
≡ Calonectria cephalosporii Hansf., Mycol. Pap. 15: 117, 1946.
≡ Nectriopsis cephalosporii (Hansf.) Samuels, Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 48: 38, 1988.
Colonies white, cottony, growing on Meliola spp. Hyphae septate, 1.7 μm wide, hyaline. Perithecia superficial, globose, (100–)110–150(–220) μm diam., yellow to orange, slightly translucent, not changing color in KOH, smooth; perithecial hairs arising from perithecial apex, septate, unbranched, (10–)17–25(–35) × 3–5.5 μm, wall 0.5–1 μm thick. Perithecial wall 7–9 μm wide, composed of small cells; perithecial apex formed by hyphae that grow outwardly to form perithecial hairs, and inwardly to form periphyses. Asci clavate, apex simple, (25–)32–45(–53) × (6–)7–9(–10) μm, 8-spored. Ascospores completely filling each ascus, ellipsoidal to fusiform, biguttulate, (8.5–)10–15.5(–18) × 1.7–4 μm, 1-septate, hyaline, smooth.
Anamorph – Acremonium-like anamorph with conidiophores arising from aerial mycelium, mononematous, macronematous, septate, monophialidic. Phialides thick-walled, with a distinctive collarette, (30–)40–50 μm long × 3–5 μm wide at the base, tapering to 1 μm width at the tip, hyaline. Conidia oblong to ellipsoidal, unicellular, (5–)7.5–9(– 12) × (1.5–)2–3(–3.5) μm, hyaline, smooth.
Specimens examined – On Meliola sp. on leaves of Olyra latifolia, Panama, Chiriquí Province, David, Botanical Garden of the Universidad Autónoma de Chiriquí (UNACHI), 8° 25′ 55″ N 82° 27′ 4″ W, 34 m a.s.l., 23 January 2020, M.A. Bermúdez, MB86 (UCH13408); on Meliola sp. on leaves of Olyra latifolia, Panama, Chiriquí Province, David, Los Algarrobos, Majagua river trail, 8° 28′ 47″ N 82° 24′ 46″ W, 80 m a.s.l., 26 February 2020, M.A. Bermúdez, MB113 (UCH13407); on Meliola pinnatae on leaves of Paullinia pinnata, Benin, Atlantique, Allada, Sékou, 6° 38′ 59″ N 2° 11′ 46″ E, 48 m a.s.l., 15 February 2022, M.A. Bermúdez, A. Tabé, D. Dongnima, M. Piepenbring, N.S. Yorou, MB139 (UNIPAR, M, GenBank accession number: OQ787065); on Meliola pinnatae on leaves of Paullinia pinnata, Benin, Atlantique, Zalimey, Lama Forest, 6° 58′ 15″ N 2° 11′ 26″ E, 43 m a.s.l., 20 September 2022, A. Krauß, A. Tabé, N.S. Yorou, O. Koukol, AK20H (UNIPAR, M).
Known hosts and distribution – On Meliola markhamiae on living leaves of Markhamia platycalyx (Bignoniaceae) in Uganda (Hansford 1946); on Meliola sp. on living leaves of Olyra latifolia (Poaceae) in Panama (this study); on Meliola pinnatae on leaves of Paullinia pinnata (Sapindaceae) in Benin (this study). M. pinnatae, O. latifolia, and P. pinnata are new hosts of D. cephalosporii, and the hyperparasite is recorded here for mainland America (Panama) and Benin for the first time.
Illustrations – This species was illustrated by Gams (1971, anamorph only), Pirozynski (1977), and Samuels (1988).
Notes – Approximately 70 species of perithecioid fungi are reported as hyperparasites of Meliolales (Bermúdez-Cova et al. 2022). Among these species, Dimerosporiella cephalosporii (Bionectriaceae, Hypocreales) is one of the most common parasites in Uganda (Hansford 1946; Gams 1971; Gams et al. 2004; Bermúdez-Cova et al. 2022). The genus Dimerosporiella was proposed by Spegazzini (1908) and now comprises species that were previously placed in the Nectria leucorrhodina group or treated within Nectriopsis (Samuels 1976, 1988; Rossman 1983). Species of the genus are fungicolous (i.e., growing on other fungi) and grow on colonies of species of Asterina, Meliolales, or Schiffnerula (Rossman et al. 1999). Species of Dimerosporiella are differentiated primarily by features of the surface of ascomatal walls and characteristics of the ascospores. For a detailed key to species of the genus, see Rossman et al. (1999).
Dimerosporiella cephalosporii is similar to D. sensitiva, from which it differs by a simple ascal apex and perithecial hairs (Samuels 1988). Both species are commonly associated with an Acremonium-like anamorph with thick-walled conidiophores and phialides (Pirozynski 1977). The conidial form is always found together with the perithecia, but there is no molecular evidence that supports this anamorph-teleomorph connection.
Sequence data – The LSU rDNA sequence obtained from fresh material of D. cephalosporii (specimen MB139) is 498 bp long and presented 32 ambiguous bases. In the tree inferred from the analysis of LSU sequences of 24 specimens (Fig. 4), D. cephalosporii is located within a strongly supported clade that comprises sequences of Acremonium spp. and other species within the Bionectriaceae. It does not cluster with any sequence of Dimerosporiella, because no sequences are available for this genus up to now.
Malacaria meliolicola Syd., Annls Mycol. 28(1/2): 69, 1930 (Fig. 7).
= Malacaria flagellata (Hansf.) Hansf., Mycol. Pap. 15: 128, 1946.
≡ Paranectria flagellata Hansf., Proc. Linn. Soc. London 153(1): 28, 1941.
Colonies white, hyphae growing closely appressed to the dark hyphae of Meliolales, 1–2 μm wide, hyaline, thin-walled. Pseudothecia superficial, growing between the synnemata of Atractilina parasitica, ovate to elongate ovate with rounded apex, 150–200 × 100–140 μm, dark vinaceous when seen macroscopically, dark cinnamon or brick when seen by light microscopy, not changing color in KOH, smooth. Pseudothecial wall 12–17 μm thick, composed of angular cells with 6–15 μm diam. (surface view). Asci bitunicate, narrowly clavate to cylindric, apex rounded, (40–)52–56(–64) × (9.5–)10–12(–16) μm, 8-spored. Pseudoparaphyses unbranched, abundant, up to 120 μm long, 1–2 μm wide, septate, hyaline, rounded at the ends, with a gelatinous external layer. Ascospores completely filling each ascus, mostly 3-septate, narrowly clavate, with an elongated base and rounded tips, (37–)44–54(–64) × 3–4.5(–5) μm, pale smoke-grey, smooth.
Specimens examined – On Meliola sp. on leaves of Coffea arabica, Benin, Atlantique, Attogon, Niaouli Forest, 6° 44′ 42″ N 2° 7′ 50″ E, 69 m a.s.l., 28 February 2022, M.A. Bermúdez, A. Tabé, D. Dongnima, M. Piepenbring, N.S. Yorou, MB178; on Meliola sp. on living leaves of Coffea arabica, Benin, Atlantique, Attogon, Niaouli Forest, 6° 44′ 23″ N 2° 8′ 26″ E, 119 m a.s.l., 19 September 2022, A. Krauß, A. Tabé, N.S. Yorou, O. Koukol, AK4H (UNIPAR, M).
Known hosts and distribution – On Irenina glabra on leaves of Coffea robusta (Rubiaceae) in Uganda (Hansford 1941). On Meliola sp. on leaves of Hamelia erecta (Rubiaceae) in Venezuela (Rossman 1987). On Meliola sp. on leaves of Coffea arabica (Rubiaceae) in Benin (this study). C. arabica is a new host of M. meliolicola, and the hyperparasite is recorded here for Benin for the first time.
Illustrations – This species was illustrated by Rossman (1987).
Notes – Malacaria meliolicola (Tubeufiaceae, Tubeufiales) resembles other perithecioid species such as Nematothecium vinosum and Hyalosphaera miconiae, but it differs from these species by the presence of unbranched pseudoparaphyses (Rossman 1987). Hansford (1941, 1946) described M. meliolicola as the probable teleomorph of Atractilina parasitica (cited as Arthrobotryum parasiticum), a common hyperparasite of Meliolales. Apparently, the pseudothecia are only found when A. parasitica is present. However, there is no molecular evidence of this anamorph-teleomorph connection. According to Deighton and Pirozynski (1972), the connection is doubtful.
Paranectria longiappendiculata Berm.-Cova & M. Piepenbr., sp. nov. (Figs. 4 and 8).
MycoBank: MB#848317.
Holotype – On Meliola sp. on living leaves of Angylocalyx oligophyllus, Benin, Atlantique, Attogon, Niaouli Forest, 6° 44′ 42″ N 2° 7′ 50″ E, 69 m a.s.l., 28 February 2022, M.A. Bermúdez, A. Tabé, D. Dongnima, I. Agonglo, O.P. Agbani, M. Piepenbring, N.S. Yorou, MB175 (M, GenBank accession number: OQ801166).
Paratype – Same locality, collection date, fungal and plant hosts, MB169 (UNIPAR).
Etymology – Named for the long appendages of the ascospores.
Colonies of white thin hyphae covering the colonies of Meliolales. Hyphae thin-walled, septate, 1–2 μm wide, hyaline. Perithecia solitary or in small groups, scattered, superficial, ovate to elongate ovate with rounded apex, (70–)90–104(–113) μm diam., pale orange to orange, not changing color in KOH, with ascomatal hairs mostly around the apex. Hairs straight to crooked, non-septate or septate, unbranched, apex obtuse or pointed, 14–20 × 2–4 μm, hyaline. Ascomatal wall 10–13 μm wide, composed of elongated cells parallel to the inner surface of the perithecium as seen in longitudinal section, and of loosely interwoven septate hyphae (surface view). Asci not found. Ascospores fusiform to ellipsoid, (12–)16–21(–32) × 2–4 μm (measurements without appendages), 1–3-septate, hyaline, smooth, with straight or curved appendages at one or both tips (rarely without appendages), up to 40 μm long. Ascospores tend to stick together when liberated from the perithecia. Ascospores tend to separate from each other when KOH is added.
Anamorph – Not known.
Known distribution – On colonies of Meliola sp. on living leaves of Angylocalyx oligophyllus (Fabaceae) in Benin.
Notes – The genus Paranectria was proposed by Saccardo (1878), with P. affinis as type species, a wood-inhabiting species of the Hypocreales (Sordariomycetes). The genus initially comprised species with hyaline, 3-septate ascospores that carry appendages at both tips (Rossman 1987). Based on this description, Stevens (1918), Hansford (1941, 1946) and other authors proposed new species in this genus, all with fungicolous lifestyle. However, none of these authors seemed to notice that many of these fungi have bitunicate asci, a feature that is present in the Dothideomycetes and not in the Sordariomycetes. Therefore, Pirozynski (1977) transferred many of these species to the genus Paranectriella (P. Henn.) Piroz., a genus that comprises eight species of tropical hyperparasites of plant parasitic fungi that resemble Paranectria, but differ fundamentally in possessing bitunicate asci. In addition to this, cells of perithecial walls of species of Bionectriaceae and Nectriaceae (Hypocreales) typically are thin-walled and elongated parallel to the surface of the perithecia as seen in longitudinal sections (Rossman et al. 1999), while corresponding cells of species of Paranectriella are isodiametric (see the examples of Paranectriella hemileiae and Paranectriella minuta below).
Paranectria longiappendiculata (specimens MB169, MB175) resembles species of the genera Paranectria and Paranectriella by the fungicolous lifestyle and partly 3-septate ascospores with appendages at the tips. In comparison to Paranectria affinis (spores 24–34 μm long; Saccardo 1878), the ascospores of P. longiappendiculata are shorter (up to 21 μm long). Paranectriella hemileiae and Paranectriella minuta produce hairs on the surface of the ascomata like P. elongata, but P. elongata differs by ascospores with long terminal appendages that can reach a length of up to 40 μm. Appendages of all the other known species of Paranectria and Paranectriella only reach up to 20 μm (Saccardo 1878; Rossman 1987). Asci were not found in the examined specimens, so it is not possible to assign them to Sordariomycetes or Dothideomycetes based on details of the walls of asci. The cells of the asci of P. longiappendiculata, however, resemble those of species of hypocrealean fungi within the Bionectriaceae and Nectriaceae (Rossman et al. 1999).
Sequence data – The LSU rDNA sequence obtained from fresh material of P. longiappendiculata (specimen MB175) is 811 bp long. Based on a MegaBLAST search in the NCBI GenBank nucleotide database using the LSU sequence data of P. longiappendiculata, the closest match was Acremonium acutatum (GenBank MH872055; identities 726/799, i.e., 90.86%), as well as other species of hypocrealean fungi. The morphological features discussed above, together with the results of the MegaBLAST search, confirm the placement of P. longiappendiculata in the Hypocreales and in the genus Paranectria. In the tree inferred from the analysis of LSU sequences of 24 specimens (Fig. 4), P. longiappendiculata is located within a strongly supported clade that comprises sequences of Acremonium spp. and other species within the Bionectriaceae.
Paranectriella hemileiae (Hansf.) Piroz., Kew Bull. 31: 598, 1977 (Fig. 9).
≡ Paranectria hemileiae Hansf., Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. 153: 28, 1941.
Colonies of white hyphae spreading over the colonies of Meliola sp. Pseudothecia solitary, scattered, superficial, globose to subglobose, 130–180 μm diam., pale luteous to white, not changing color in KOH, with sparse to abundant ascomatal hairs, scattered all over the ascomatal surface. Hairs straight to slightly sigmoid, septate or non-septate, unbranched, thick-walled, 14–30 × 4–6 μm, hyaline. Pseudothecial wall composed of isodiametric cells, 5–9 μm, thin-walled (surface view). Asci bitunicate, clavate to broadly cylindric, apex rounded, 50–68 × 9–14 μm, 8-spored. Pseudoparaphyses not seen. Ascospores fusiform, mostly 3-septate, slightly constricted at the septa, with straight appendages mostly at both tips, (14–)16–18(–20) × 5–7 μm, hyaline, smooth.
Anamorph – Not observed (Titaea hemileiae Hansf. according to Rossman 1987).
Specimen examined – On Meliola sp. on living leaves of Xylopia frutescens, Panama, Chiriquí Province, Cochea, Cochea river trail, 8° 32′ 37″ N 82° 23′ 03″ W, 181 m a.s.l., 26 February 2020, M.A. Bermúdez, A. Sanjur, A. Villarreal, MB108 (UCH13409).
Known hosts and distribution – On sori of Hemileia vastatrix (Pucciniales) on leaves of Coffea robusta (Rubiaceae) in Uganda (Rossman 1987); on Meliola sp. on leaves of Xylopia frutescens (Annonaceae) in Panama (this study). Meliola sp. and X. frutescens are new hosts of P. hemileiae, and the hyperparasite is recorded here for mainland America (Panama) for the first time.
Illustrations – This species was illustrated by Pirozynski (1977) and Rossman (1987), as well as by Carmichael et al. (1980, anamorph only) and Hansford (1946, anamorph only).
Notes – Up to now, the sexual form Paranectriella hemileiae is only known from the type specimen, growing on sori of Hemileia vastatrix. Despite its occurrence on a rust, the species is retained in the genus Paranectriella due to the presence of 3-septate ascospores with terminal appendages (Rossman 1987). There is a possible associated anamorph to this species, namely, Titaea hemileiae. It produces staurospores, like some other species (e.g., P. miconiae; Pirozynski 1977, Rossman 1987). However, no conidia were found in the examined specimen (MB108).
Paranectriella minuta (Hansf.) Piroz., Kew Bull. 31(3): 600, 1977 (Fig. 10).
≡ Paranectria minuta Hansf., Proc. Linn. Soc. London 153(1): 30, 1941.
Colonies of white hyphae covering colonies of Meliolales. Hyphae thin-walled, septate, 2–3 μm wide, hyaline. Pseudothecia solitary or in small groups, scattered, superficial, globose, (80–)90–115(–150) μm diam., pale luteous, pale orange to white, translucent, not changing color in KOH, with ascomatal hairs more or less close to the apex. Hairs straight to crooked, unbranched, apex obtuse, non-septate, 24–40 × 3–6 μm, hyaline. Pseudothecial wall 6–10 μm thick, composed of isodiametric cells 7–15 μm wide, thin-walled (surface view). Asci bitunicate, broadly cylindric to obovate, apex rounded, (37–)40–50(–61) × 12–18 μm, 8-spored. Pseudoparaphyses not seen. Ascospores fusiform to ellipsoid, 3-septate, slightly constricted at the septa, with a straight or curved appendage of 3–11 μm length at each tip, (14–)16–18 × 5–6 μm, hyaline, smooth.
Specimens examined – On Meliola sp. on living leaves of Coffea arabica, Benin, Atlantique, Attogon, Niaouli Forest, 6° 44′ 23″ N 2° 8′ 26″ E, 119 m a.s.l., 19 September 2022, A. Krauß, A. Tabé, N.S. Yorou, O. Koukol, AK4H (M); on Meliola sp. on living leaves of Opilia celtidifolia, Benin, Donga, Bassila, 8° 59′ 58″ N 1° 38′ 45″ E, 360 m a.s.l., 27 September 2022, A. Krauß, A. Tabé, N.S. Yorou, O. Koukol, AK38H (UNIPAR, GenBank accession number: OQ801179).
Known hosts and distribution – On Meliola paulliniae on leaves of Paullinia pinnata (Sapindaceae) in Uganda (Hansford 1941); on Meliola sp. on leaves of Coffea arabica (Rubiaceae) in Benin (this study); on Meliola sp. on leaves of Opilia celtidifolia (Opiliaceae) in Benin (this study). C. arabica and O. celtidifolia are new hosts of P. minuta, and the hyperparasite is recorded here for Benin for the first time.
Anamorph – Not known.
Illustrations – This species was illustrated by Hansford (1941), Pirozynski (1977) and Rossman (1987).
Notes – Paranectriella minuta is similar to P. hemileiae, but the ascomatal hairs of P. minuta are located mostly close to the apex of the pseudothecium. The presence of appendages on the ascospores and small, translucent ascomata can also occur in some species of the genus Hyalocrea, but Hyalocrea spp. are characterized by the absence of pseudoparaphyses (Rossman 1987). Pseudoparaphyses, however, were not found in the specimen examined (AK38H). Nevertheless, we identify the specimens from Benin as P. minuta, because the ascospores of these specimens are smaller than those of hyperparasitic species of Hyalocrea (e.g., H. meliolicola, 26–35 × 7–9 μm; Rossman 1987).
Sequence data – The LSU rDNA sequence obtained from fresh material of P. minuta (specimen AK38H) is 494 bp long. Based on a MegaBLAST search in the NCBI GenBank nucleotide database using the LSU sequence data of P. minuta, the closest match was Quixadomyces hongheensis (GenBank MW264194; identities 460/491, i.e., 93.69%), as well as other species of Pleosporales. Hyde et al. (2013) designated the family Paranectriellaceae to accommodate hyperparasitic species of Dothideomycetes with bright colored ascomata, ascospores with transverse septa and prominent appendages. However, there is no molecular DNA sequence data that supports this designation. Ours represent the first DNA sequence of a fungus of the genus Paranectriella, and more sequences are necessary to evaluate this hypothesis.
Key to species of perithecioid hyperparasites on Meliolales known for Benin and Panama
1 Ascomata dark vinaceous to dark brick; ascospores smoke-gray............................. Malacaria meliolicola
1* Ascomata white, pale luteous to orange; ascospores hyaline................................................................... 2
2 Ascospores 1-septate, biguttulate; asci unitunicate.................................... Dimerosporiella cephalosporii
2* Ascospores (up to) 3-septate, with appendages at their tips; asci bitunicate............................................ 3
3 Appendages 20–40 μm long..................................................................... Paranectria longiappendiculata
3* Appendages up to 20 μm long................................................................................................................... 4
4 Pseudothecia with sparse to abundant thick-walled ascomatal hairs, scattered all over the ascomatal surface.......................................................................................................................Paranectriella hemileiae
4* Pseudothecia with ascomatal hairs mostly close to the apex Paranectriella minuta.
Discussion
Hyperparasitic fungi on Meliolales have been collected in the past mainly in Brazil, Dominican Republic, and Puerto Rico in America, as well as in Ghana, Sierra Leone, and Uganda in Africa (Bermúdez-Cova et al. 2022). In the context of the present study, we analyzed 16 specimens of Meliolales associated with hyperparasites, corresponding to eight species of hyperparasitic fungi. Seven species represent new records: five for Benin and four for Panama. One species is new to science. Calloriopsis herpotricha is recorded for the first time for Africa and Dimerosporiella cephalosporii and Paranectriella hemileiae for mainland America. These findings are based on only three months of fieldwork and show a blatant lack of investigation on hyperparasitic fungi in the tropics.
Patterns of distribution of hyperparasitic fungi have been studied mainly for hyperparasites of rusts and powdery mildews (Zewdie et al. 2021), but never for those infecting black mildews. The distribution of hyperparasitic fungi is restricted to that of their host (Sun et al. 2019). As Meliolales are restricted to tropical and subtropical areas (Piepenbring 2015), hyperparasites are expected to be found in these regions as well. We also expect wide distribution areas of hyperparasitic fungi on Meliolales because of their broad spectra of host species (Bermúdez-Cova et al. 2022). In fact, the data presented in this study suggest that at least part of the species of hyperparasitic fungi of Meliolales have a pantropical distribution, as they have been recorded both in paleotropical and neotropical regions. This is consistent with the assumptions made by Samuels et al. (2002) regarding the pantropical distribution of tropical perithecioid fungi. Extensive additional fieldwork is needed in order to unravel distribution patterns of hyperparasitic fungi on meliolalean hosts.
It is difficult to obtain molecular sequence data from hyperparasites especially because of their incapability of growing in artificial media and the fact that they develop intermingled with the primary parasite and many other organisms (Bermúdez-Cova et al. 2022). As a consequence, isolating and sequencing hyperparasitic fungi is a challenging task. There is also a lack of sequences of hyperparasitic fungi in public databases. Therefore, the sequences obtained in the context of the present work can be related to existing species concepts only based on morphology, and issues such as anamorph-teleomorph connections cannot be confirmed. Nevertheless, in this study for the first time ever, DNA sequences of hyperparasitic fungi on Meliolales are published. This example emphasizes that field work paired with molecular analysis still plays a crucial role for modern mycology, especially for challenging fungal groups, such as hyperparasites.
Data Availability
Specimens are deposited in the herbarium at the Universidad Autónoma de Chiriquí (UCH), in the mycological herbarium of the University of Parakou (UNIPAR) and/or in the Botanische Staatssammlung München (M). Sequence data are submitted to GenBank.
References
Akoègninou A, Van der Burg WJ, Van der Maesen LJG (2006) Flore Analytique du Bénin. Backhuys Publishers, Wageningen
Baral HO, Marson G (2001) Monographic revision of Gelatinopsis and Calloriopsis (Calloriopsideae, Leotiales). In: Micologia 2000. Associazione Micologica Bresadola: 23–46
Benson DA, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipmanbn DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW (2014) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D32–D37. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1070
Bermúdez-Cova MA, Cruz-Laufer AJ, Piepenbring M (2022) Hyperparasitic fungi on black mildews (Meliolales, Ascomycota): Hidden fungal diversity in the tropics. Front Fungal Biol 3:885279. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffunb.2022.885279
Bermúdez-Cova MA, Haelewaters D, de Bekker C et al (2023) Hyperparasitic fungi—definitions, diversity, ecology, and research. Authorea. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.168787020.07281183/v1
Carmichael JW, Kendrick KWB, Connors IL, Sigler IL (1980) Genera of hyphomycetes. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Cash EK (1938) New records of Hawaiian discomycetes. Mycologia 30(1):97–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1938.12017255
Condit R, Pérez R, Daguerre N (2011) Trees of Panama and Costa Rica. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, USA
Crous PW, Schoch CL, Hyde KD, Wood AR, Gueidan C, de Hoog GS, Groenewald JZ (2009) Phylogenetic lineages in the Capnodiales. Stud Mycol 64:17–47. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2009.64.02
Damon SC (1953) Notes on the hyphomycetous genera, Spegazzinia Sacc and Isthmospora Stevens. Bull Torrey Bot Club 80(3):155–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/2482189
Deighton FC, Pirozynski KA (1972) Microfungi. V. More hyperparasitic hyphomycetes. Myc Pap 128:110
Ellis JB, Martin G (1883) New Florida Fungi i. Am Nat 17(2):1283–1285
Fazekas AJ, Kuzmina ML, Newmaster SG, Hollingsworth PM (2012) DNA barcoding methods for land plants. In: DNA Barcodes. Methods in Molecular Biology, eds Kress WJ, Erickson DL (Humana, Totowa), pp 223–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-591-6_11
Gams W (1971) Cephalosporium-artige Schimmelpilze (Hyphomycetes). Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart
Gams W, Diederich P, Poldmaa K (2004) Fungicolous fungi. In: Biodiversity of Fungi: Inventory and Monitoring Methods, eds Mueller GM, Bills GF, Foster MS (Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press), pp 343–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012509551-8/50020-9
Hansford CG (1941) Contribution towards the fungus flora of Uganda III. Proc Linn Soc Lond 153:4–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1941.tb01378.x
Hansford CG (1946) The foliicolous ascomycetes, their parasites and associated fungi. Mycol Pap 15:1–240
Hawksworth DL (1981) A survey of the fungicolous conidial fungi. In: Biology of Conidial Fungi, Vol. 1, eds G. T. Cole and B. Kendrick (Amsterdam: Academic Press), pp 171–244.
Hawksworth DL (2015) Lichenization: The origins of a fungal life-style. In: Recent Advances in Lichenology. Modern Methods and Approaches in Lichen Systematics and Culture Techniques, Volume 2, eds Kumar Upreti D, Divakar PK, Shukla V, Bajpai R (India: Springer New Delhi), pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2235-4_1
Hennings PC (1898) Fungi Novo-Guineenses. III. Botanisch Jahrb 25:495–509
Hofmann TA, Piepenbring M (2021) Checklist of fungi in Panama 2020. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.25573/data.13341605.v2
Honegger R (2022) Lichens and their allies past and present. In: Plant Relationships. Fungal-plant interactions, eds B. Scott, C. Mesarich (Switzerland: Springer Cham), pp. 133–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16503-0_6
Hongsanan S, Tian Q, Persoh D, Zeng XY, Hyde KD, Chomnunti P et al (2015) Meliolales. Fungal Divers 74:91–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-015-0344-7
Hooker WJ (1851) Hooker’s journal of botany and Kew Garden miscellany 3 (London: Reeve, Benham, and Reeve), pp 1–384.
Hughes SJ (1953) Fungi from Gold Coast. II. Mycol Pap 50:1–104
Hyde KD, Jones EBG, Liu JK et al (2013) Families of Dothideomycetes. Fungal Divers 63:1–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-013-0263-4
Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A (2012) Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199
Kendrick B (2017) The fifth kingdom: an introduction to mycology. Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis
Kress WJ, Erickson DL, Jones FA, Swenson NG, Perez R, Sanjur O, Bermingham E (2009) Plant DNA barcodes and a community phylogeny of a tropical forest dynamics plot in Panama. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:8621–18626. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909820106
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
Levin RA, Wagner WL, Hoch PC, Nepokroeff M, Pires JC, Zimmer EA, Sytsma KJ (2003) Family-level relationships of Onagraceae based on chloroplast rbc L and ndh F data. Am J Bot 90:107–115. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.1.107
Lutzoni F, Pagel M, Reeb V (2001) Major fungal lineages are derived from lichen symbiotic ancestors. Nature 411:937–940. https://doi.org/10.1038/35082053
Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). IEEE, New Orleans, 8. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
Nakamura T, Yamada KD, Tomii K, Katoh K (2018) Parallelization of MAFFT for large-scale multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 34:2490–2492. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty121
O'Donnell K (1993) Fusarium and its near relatives. In: The fungal holomorph: mitotic, meiotic and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics, eds Reynolds DR, & Taylor JW, (Wallingford: CABI), pp. 225– 233
Old KM, Wingfield MJ, Yuan ZQ (2003) A manual of diseases of eucalypts in South-East Asia. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/001428
Pfister DH (1976) Calloriopsis and Micropyxis: two discomycete genera in the Calloriopsideae trib. nov. Mycotaxon 4(2):340–346
Piepenbring M, Hofmann TA, Kirschner R, Mangelsdorff R, Perdomo O, Rodríguez Justavino D, Trampe T (2011) Diversity patterns of neotropical plant parasitic microfungi. Ecotropica 17:27–40
Piepenbring M, Maciá-Vicente JG, Codjia JEI, Glatthorn C, Kirk P, Maeswaet Y, Minter D, Olou BA, Reschke K, Schmidt M, Yorou NS (2020) Mapping mycological ignorance – checklists and diversity patterns of fungi known for West Africa. IMA Fungus 11:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43008-020-00034-y
Piepenbring M (2015) Introduction to mycology in the tropics. st. paul, mn: aps press. https://doi.org/10.1094/9780890546130.fm
Pirozynski KA (1977) Notes on hyperparasitic Sphaeriales, Hypocreales and ‘hypocreoid Dothideales’. Kew Bull 31(3):595–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/4119409
Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61:539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
Rossman AY (1983) The phragmosporous species of Nectria and related genera. Myc Pap 150:1–164
Rossman AY (1987) The Tubeufiaceae and similar Loculoascomycetes. Myc Pap 157:1–71
Rossman AY, Samuels GJ, Rogerson CT, Lowen R (1999) Genera of Bionectriaceae, Hypocreaceae and Nectriaceae (Hypocreales, Ascomycetes). Stud Mycol 42:1–248
Saccardo PA (1878) Enumeratio pyrenomycetum hypocreaceorum hucusque cognitorum systemate carpologico dispositorum. Michelia 1(3):277–325
Saccardo PA, Trotter A (1913) Fungi Tripolitani. Ann Mycol 11(5):409–420
Saccardo PA (1889) Sylloge Fungorum 8: ix-xvii (Italy, Padua; P.A. Saccardo), pp. 1–1143
Saccardo PA, Saccardo D (1906) Sylloge Fungorum 18 (Italy, Patavii; P.A. Saccardo), pp. 1–838
Samuels GJ (1976) A revision of the fungi formerly classified as Nectria subgenus Hyphonectria. Mem NY Bot Gard 26:1–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/4117145
Samuels GJ (1988) Fungicolous, lichenicolous, and myxomyceticolous species of Hypocreopsis, Nectriopsis, Nectria, Peristomalis, and Trichonectria. Mem NY Bot Gard 48:1–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/3760149
Samuels GJ, Rossman AY, Schroers HJ (2002) Key to tropical species of Nectrialike fungi. CABI Books, CABI International. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995434.0013
Santesson R (1951) Mykosymbios — ett misstolkat förhållande mellan två svampar. Sven Bot Tidskr 45(1):300
Spegazzini C (1908) Fungi aliquot paulistani. Revista Mus La Plata 15(2):10
Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033
Stevens FL (1918) Some meliolicolous parasites and commensals from Porto Rico. Bot Gaz 65:227–250. https://doi.org/10.1086/332230
Sun J-Z, Liu X-Z, McKenzie EHC, Jeewon R, Liu JK, Zhang X-L et al (2019) Fungicolous fungi: terminology, diversity, distribution, evolution and species checklist. Fungal Divers 95:337–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00422-9
Sydow H, Sydow P (1917) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Pilzflora der Philippinen-Inseln. Ann Mycol 15(3–4):165–268
Talavera G, Castresana J (2007) Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol 56:564–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701472164
Tubaki R (1963) Notes on the Japanese hyphomycetes. I Trans Mycol Soc Japan 4:83–90
Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
Wagner T, Ryvarden L (2002) Phylogeny and taxonomy of the genus Phylloporia (Hymenochaetales). Mycol Prog 1:105–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-006-0009-8
White TJ, Brun T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applications, eds Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (San Diego: Academic Press).
Zeng XY, Zhao JJ, Hongsanan S, Chomnunti P, Boonmee S, Wen TC (2017) A checklist for identifying Meliolales species. Mycosphere 8:218–359. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/8/1/16
Zewdie B, Tack AJM, Ayalew B, Adugna G, Nemomissa S, Hylander K (2021) Temporal dynamics and biocontrol potential of a hyperparasite on coffee leaf rust across a landscape in Arabica coffee’s native range. Agric Ecosyst Environ 311:107297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107297
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the University of Parakou and the University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin, for the support and facilities made available for this study. We acknowledge help by Dr. Pierre Agbani (Botanical Garden of the Université d’Abomey-Calavi) for his assistance with the identification of host plants and help by Daouda Dongnima during fieldwork. We acknowledge the support and facilities made available by Orlando Cáceres and the Universidad Autónoma de Chiriquí (UNACHI) in Panama. The Environmental Ministry of Panama (MiAmbiente) is thanked for issuing the collection and export permits (SE/APHO-1-2019, SEX/H-5-2020, PA-01-ARG-049-2021). We are grateful to the Ministry of Environment of the Benin Republic for issuing the collecting permits and for the elaboration of the ABS Nagoya Protocol documents n° 636/DGEFC/ANC-APA/DCPRN/PF-APA.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This study was supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, Germany) as part of the project “Diversity and Uses of Tropical African Fungi: Edible mushrooms of Benin” (01DG20015FunTrAf). A special gratitude goes to the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), for supporting the first author within the framework of the scholarship program for doctoral studies in Germany (Ref. no.: 91726217). AT is supported by the Franz Adickes Foundation Fund, within the framework of the scholarship program for international doctoral candidates offered by the Goethe Research Academy for Early Career Researchers (GRADE).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Affousatou Tabé, Alicia Sanjur, Anna Krauß, Meike Piepenbring, Miguel Bermúdez-Cova, and Nourou S. Yorou collected specimens. Samples and collection permits preparation were performed by Tina A. Hofmann and Nourou S. Yorou. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Miguel Bermúdez-Cova, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Section Editor: Tanay Bose
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bermúdez-Cova, M.A., Krauß, A., Sanjur, A. et al. Diversity of hyperparasitic fungi on Meliolales (Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota): new species, records, and molecular data from Benin and Panama. Mycol Progress 22, 65 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-023-01913-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-023-01913-5