Abstract
Herd behavior in financial markets often leads to unjustified macroscopic phenomena. However, despite existing studies on modeling herd behavior, how it varies across individual agents and over time remains unclear. We show that herd behavior in mutual fund companies can be understood from the functional networks representing interactions inferred from investment similarities. Specifically, in this paper, the spatial characteristics of herd behavior stand for the topology relationships of observations in networks. We analyze the collective dynamics of mutual fund investment from 2003 to 2019 in China using the language of network science and show that herding behavior accompanies this industry’s development but dwindles after the 2015 Chinese market crash. By integrating community detection analysis, we found an increased degree of coherence in the collective herding behavior of the system, even though the localization of herding behavior decreases for clusters of mutual fund companies when the systemic risk builds up. Further analysis showed that herding behavior impacts the payoff of individual fund companies differently across years. The spatial-temporal changes of herding behavior between mutual funds presented in this paper shed light on the debate of individual versus systemic risk and, thus, could interest regulators and investors.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Asia Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association (2019). China Capital Markets. Asia Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association, Hong Kong, China.
Carhart M (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance 52(1):57–82.
Chang E C, Cheng J W, Khorana A (2000). An examination of herd behavior in equity markets: An international perspective. Journal of Banking and Finance 24(10):1651–1679.
Chen J, Hong H, Huang M, Kubik J (2004). Does fund size erode mutual fund performance? The role of liquidity and organization. The American Economic Review 94(5):1276–1302.
Cheng X, Zhao N (2020). Modelling the diffusion of investment decisions on modular social networks. Complexity 2020:1–8.
Christie W G, Huang R D (1995). Following the pied piper: Do individual returns herd around the market? Financial Analysts Journal 51(4):31–37.
Delpini D, Battiston S, Caldarelli G, Riccaboni M (2019). Systemic risk from investment similarities. PLOS ONE 14(5):1–15.
Fabozzi F J, Francis J C (1979). Mutual fund systematic risk for bull and bear markets: An empirical examination. Journal of Finance 34(5):1243–1250.
Fang H, Shen C, Lee Y (2017). The dynamic and asymmetric herding behavior of us equity fund managers in the stock market. International Review of Economics & Finance 49:353–369.
Fortunato S (2009). Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports 486(3):75–174.
Girvan M, Newman M (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99(12):7821–7826.
Hong H G, Kubik J D, Stein J C (2004). Social interaction and stock market participation. Journal of Finance 59(1):137–163.
Hou W, Yu J (2018). Fund asset network, investment capacity and the risk of a sharp fall in the fund’s net asset value — equity-based fund research. Financial Market 4(9):86–96.
James Duvall, Judy Steenstra (2020). 2020 Investment Company Fact Book. The Investment Company Institute, United States
Jiang H, Verardo M (2013). Does herding behavior reveal skill? An analysis of mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance 73(5):2229–2269.
Kahneman D, Tversky A (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.
Lakonishok J, Shleifer A, Vishny R W (1992). The impact of institutional trading on stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics 32(1):23–43.
Li H J, An H Z, Huang J C, Gao X Y, Shi Y L (2014). Correlation of the holding behaviour of the holding-based network of chinese fund management companies based on the node topological characteristics. ACTA PHYSICA SINICA 63(4):048901–10.
Lu S, Zhao J, Wang H, Ren R (2018). Herding boosts too-connected-to-fail risk in stock market of China. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 505:945–964.
Luo R, Tian Z (2020). Mutual fund network competition barrier and stock information environment. China Industrial Economics 3(018):137–154.
Maug E, Naik N (2012). Herding and delegated portfolio management: The impact of relative performance evaluation on asset allocation. Quarterly Journal of Finance 1(2):265–292.
Mucha P, Richardson T, Macon K, Porter M, Onnela J P (2010). Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks. Science 328(5980):876–878.
Mukaka M (2012). Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Medical Journal 24(3):69–71.
Pool V K, Stoffman N, Yonker S E (2013). The people in your neighborhood: Social interactions and mutual fund portfolios. Journal of Finance 70(6):2679–2732.
Qi T, Li J, Xie W, Ding H (2019). Alumni networks and investment strategy: Evidence from Chinese mutual funds. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 56(11):2639–2655.
Scharfstein D, Stein J (1990). Herd behavior and investment. American Economic Review 80(3):465–479.
Tan L, Chiang T C, Mason J R, Nelling E (2008). Herding behavior in Chinese stock markets: An examination of a and b shares. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 16(1):61–77.
Titman S, Grinblatt M, Wermers R (1995). Momentum investment strategies, portfolio performance, and herding: A study of mutual fund behavior. American Economic Review 85(5):1088–1105.
Wang X, Li X, Chen G (2012). Network Science: An Introduction. Higher Education Press.
Wool P (2013). Essays concerning the network structure of mutual fund holdings and the behavior of institutional investors. PhD Thesis, UCLA.
Wu X, Guo X, Qiao Z (2020). Institutional investor network centrality and stock market information efficiency. Business Management Journal 6(009):153–171.
Zhu X, Pan R, Li G, Liu Y, Wang H (2017). Network vector autoregression. The Annals of Statistics 45(3):1096–1123.
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71873012, 11971504, 72001222), the Program for Innovation Research, the Disciplinary Funding and the Emerging Interdisciplinary Project of Central University of Finance and Economic. Shan Lu is the corresponding author of this paper. We thank referees for their help to improve the quality of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Rong Guan is an associate professor on statistics at Central University of Finance and Economics, China. She received her doctoral degree on management science and engineering from Beihang University in 2013. She specializes in statistical analysis of complex data, such as interval data and compositional data. She has published over twenty articles on the topic of complex data analysis. She has been a PI or Co-PI for several research programs supported by National Natural Science Funding of China. Her recent research interests focus on network data and its applications with financial market.
Hongjia Chen is currently a postgraduate of statistics and mathematics, Central University of Finance and Economics, China. Her main research interest is network science.
Shan Lu received her Ph.D. degree in statistics in 2019 and B.S. degree in industrial engineering in 2014 from Beihang University. She is currently an assistant professor at School of Statistics and Mathematics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing China. Her main research interests are complex data analysis, machine learning and network science.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guan, R., Chen, H. & Lu, S. Modeling the Spatial-temporal Characteristics of Mutual Funds’ Herd Behavior. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 30, 748–776 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-021-5514-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-021-5514-4