Abstract
The aerodynamic performance of a simplified aircraft model with a pair of actively deformed membrane wings is investigated experimentally in this work. The active deformation is achieved with Macro fiber composite (MFC) actuators, which are attached to the upper surface of the wings and occupied 13.7% of the wing surface area. Wind tunnel experiments are conducted to evaluate the influence of membrane active deformation on the aerodynamic performance of the aircraft. The results show that the membrane deforms and vibrates under the actuation which can effectively suppress the leading-edge separation and facilitate the reattachment. Therefore, compared with the rigid wing model, the lift coefficient of the actively deformed membrane wing model is enhanced remarkably from the angle of attack of 7° to 22°. The stall angle is delayed by 2°, and a maximum lift coefficient enhancement of 32.5% is reached, which shows a wide potential application in improving the aerodynamic performance of modern aircraft.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Michelson R C. Overview of micro air vehicle system design and integration issues. In: Blockley R, Shyy W, eds. Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2010
Shyy W, Ifju P, Viieru D. Membrane wing-based micro air vehicles. Appl Mech Rev, 2005, 58: 283–301
Levin O, Shyy W. Optimization of a low Reynolds number airfoil with flexible membrane. Cmes-Comp Model Eng, 2001, 2: 523–536
Smith R, Shyy W. Computational model of flexible membrane wings in steady laminar flow. AIAA J, 1995, 33: 1769–1777
Smith R, Shyy W. Computation of unsteady laminar flow over a flexible two-dimensional membrane wing. Phys Fluids, 1995, 7: 2175–2184
Ifju P G, Jenkins D A, Ettinger S, et al. Flexible-wing-based micro air vehicles. In: 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. Reno, Nevada, 2002
Rojratsirikul P, Wang Z, Gursul I. Effect of pre-strain and excess length on unsteady fluid-structure interactions of membrane airfoils. J Fluids Struct, 2010, 26: 359–376
Huang G, Xia Y, Dai Y, et al. Fluid-structure interaction in piezoelectric energy harvesting of a membrane wing. Phys Fluids, 2021, 33: 063610
Song A, Tian X, Israeli E, et al. Aeromechanics of membrane wings with implications for animal flight. AIAA J, 2008, 46: 2096–2106
Rojratsirikul P, Wang Z, Gursul I. Unsteady fluid-structure interactions of membrane airfoils at low Reynolds numbers. Exp Fluids, 2009, 46: 859–872
He X, Wang J J. Fluid—structure interaction of a flexible membrane wing at a fixed angle of attack. Phys Fluids, 2020, 32: 127102
Bleischwitz R, de Kat R, Ganapathisubramani B. Aspect-ratio effects on aeromechanics of membrane wings at moderate Reynolds numbers. AIAA J, 2015, 53: 780–788
Béguin B, Breitsamter C, Adams N. Aerodynamic investigations of a morphing membrane wing. AIAA J, 2012, 50: 2588–2599
Béguin B, Breitsamter C. Effects of membrane pre-stress on the aerodynamic characteristics of an elasto-flexible morphing wing. Aerospace Sci Tech, 2014, 37: 138–150
Guo Q, He X, Wang Z, et al. Effects of wing flexibility on aerodynamic performance of an aircraft model. Chin J Aeronautics, 2021, 34: 133–142
Hays M R, Morton J, Dickinson B, et al. Aerodynamic control of micro air vehicle wings using electroactive membranes. J Intelligent Material Syst Struct, 2012, 24: 862–878
Curet O M, Carrere A, Waldman R, et al. Aerodynamic characterization of a wing membrane with variable compliance. AIAA J, 2014, 52: 1749–1756
Bohnker J R, Breuer K S. Control of separated flow using actuated compliant membrane wings. AIAA J, 2019, 57: 3801–3811
Bouremel Y, Chan W L, Jones G, et al. Measurements of a symmetric airfoil morphed by macro fiber composite actuators. In: 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Atlanta, Georgia, 2014
Jones G R, Debiasi M, Bouremel Y, et al. Open-loop flow control at low Reynolds numbers using periodic airfoil morphing. In: 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Kissimmee, Florida, 2015
Wang J J, Liu Y. Experimental study on lift characteristics for flow over flexible cropped delta wings. J Aircraft, 2008, 45: 2158–2161
Zhan J X, Wang J J. The effect of leading-edge sweep angle asymmetry on lateral aerodynamics. Sci China Ser E-Technol Sci, 2009, 52: 2445–2448
Qu Y, Wang J, Feng L, et al. Effect of excitation frequency on flow characteristics around a square cylinder with a synthetic jet positioned at front surface. J Fluid Mech, 2019, 880: 764–798
Kline S J, McClintock F A. Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments. Mech Eng, 1953, 75: 3–8
Wang C Y, Gao Q, Wei R J, et al. Weighted divergence correction scheme and its fast implementation. Exp Fluids, 2017, 58: 44
Michos A, Bergeles G, Athanassiadis N. Aerodynamic characteristics of NACA 0012 airfoil in relation to wind generators. Wind Eng, 1983, 7: 247–262
Zhou Y, Alam M M, Yang H X, et al. Fluid forces on a very low Reynolds number airfoil and their prediction. Int J Heat Fluid Flow, 2011, 32: 329–339
Marchman J F. Aerodynamic testing at low Reynolds numbers. J Aircraft, 1987, 24: 107–114
Acikel H H, Genc M S. Control of laminar separation bubble over wind turbine airfoil using partial flexibility on suction surface. Energy, 2018, 165: 176–190
Rojratsirikul P, Genc M S, Wang Z, et al. Flow-induced vibrations of low aspect ratio rectangular membrane wings. J Fluids Struct, 2011, 27: 1296–1309
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12127802 and 11721202).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, S., Guo, Q., Wang, J. et al. Influence of membrane wing active deformation on the aerodynamic performance of an aircraft model. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 65, 2474–2484 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2128-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2128-9