Abstract
Purpose
The construction of riparian buffer strips has become increasingly important due to the effective phosphorus (P) retention of the strips, thus preventing eutrophication in freshwater ecosystems. The key mechanism is P sorption in soils. To provide some suggestions for increasing the sorption ability of P, the relationships between P sorption behavior and both land use patterns and distance from the shoreline were determined.
Materials and methods
In April, July, and October 2013, field investigations were carried out along the shoreline of Lake Chaohu. Eleven sections, including 36 sampling sites at different distances from the shoreline, were chosen, and these sections contained different types of riparian buffer strips, such as grassland, farmland, forest, wetland, and forest/grassland. The P species, sorption parameters, and dominant vegetation species were analyzed.
Results and discussion
The total P (TP) and P sorption maximum (Qmax) showed no recognizable seasonal variation and were closely correlated with the distance from the shoreline. The further the distance from the shoreline, the higher the TP and Qmax values, suggesting that soil traits could determine the P sorption extent. However, the Olsen-P content and equilibrium P concentration (EPC0) fluctuated greatly, with the peak occurring in spring and the minimum occurring in summer in the majority of the sampling sites. In addition, positive relationships existed between the TP content and the Qmax value as well as the Olsen-P content and the EPC0 value. Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) further showed that the Olsen-P content and EPC0 values were closely related to the dominant vegetation species, indicating that land use patterns played a decisive role in regulating the P sorption strength and the level of available P.
Conclusions
To effectively adsorb P (increase Qmax) and prevent P leaching (reduce the EPC0), we recommend changing the land use patterns (more constructed wetlands and forests with grass) in riparian buffers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Riparian buffer strips, the interface between land and freshwater ecosystems, have been considered the last line of defense and play a pivotal role in nutrient removal from nonpoint source pollution through soil adsorption, microbial immobilization, and vegetation utilization, which could effectively alleviate freshwater eutrophication (Syversen 2005; Stutter et al. 2009). Phosphorus (P) has been identified as the first limiting factor for phytoplankton growth and eutrophication in freshwater ecosystems (Shen et al. 2018). Therefore, P removal efficiency in riparian buffer strips has become increasingly vital and has been considered a priority for designing riparian buffer restoration or protection by watershed managers and planners (Brian et al. 2004; Weissteiner et al. 2013). The establishment of buffer strips has been adopted in riparian areas to target the main transport pathways of P, including P retention (Kronvang et al. 2005).
P retention in riparian buffer zones is controlled by a range of physical, geochemical, and biological processes, including sediment deposition, sorption and precipitation, reduction and oxidation processes, plant uptake, and biological mineralization-immobilization dynamics (Hoffmann et al. 2009). P sorption has been considered the most important long-term P sequestration mechanism (Zhang et al. 2010a), which is mainly associated with iron and aluminum oxides as well as the organic matter in soils (Subramaniam and Singh 1997; Giesler et al. 2005; Li et al. 2007).
Moreover, land use patterns determine soil traits, which further influence P sorption and retention ability. Riparian soils can be statistically separated by habitat type, providing evidence that they deliver ecosystem services to differing extents (De et al. 2018). Grass, woody vegetation, and forests have been considered effective measures for nitrate and phosphate reduction from highly polluted subsurface flow (Kyehan et al. 2000; Zhang et al. 2010b; Izydorczyk et al. 2018). Additionally, the recognizable difference in the P retention efficiency in riparian buffer strips with different land use patterns indicates the different optimal width demand when establishing buffer zones, which has been reported and reviewed (Hoffmann et al. 2009; Weissteiner et al. 2013). As a consequence, the functions of soil in riparian buffer strips as a sink or source of phosphorus must be greatly affected by land use patterns along the shoreline, which could be estimated by P sorption parameters, e.g., equilibrium P concentration (EPC0) and P sorption maximum (Qmax).
An integrated riparian buffer zone may be a valuable modification of dry buffer strips to mitigate the adverse impacts of high nutrient loading from agricultural fields to the aquatic environment (Zak et al. 2018), indicating that the distance from the shoreline could influence P retention. However, little research has focused on the difference in P sorption characteristics in the soils of riparian buffer strips with different distances from the shoreline, and the relative mechanisms and explanations are scarce.
In this study, spatial and seasonal samples were taken from soils representing different patterns of land use and different distances from the shoreline around a Chinese large shallow lake (Lake Chaohu). The different P species and P sorption behaviors in the soils were analyzed. The aims of this study were to (1) examine the seasonal and spatial variation trends in the P species and P sorption behaviors; (2) test whether the distance from the shoreline could influence the P sorption behaviors and further determine the phosphorus forms, determining the mechanisms; and (3) provide suggestions for restoring or modifying riparian buffer strips to greatly improve the P retention efficiency.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study area description
Lake Chaohu (117° 16′ 54″–117° 51′ 46″ E and 31° 25′ 28″–31° 43′ 28″ N), one of the five largest freshwater lakes in China, is located in the Yangtze-Huaihe region, central to Anhui Province. Its surface area is approximately 780 km2, the total drainage area is 13,486 km2, and the shoreline length around the whole lake is 184.66 km. The basic limnological data were provided by Xu et al. (2005). The main types of land use in the Lake Chaohu watershed can be roughly classified into six classes: abandoned field, shrubbery, artificial Pinus massoniana forest, grassland, secondary Pinus massoniana forest, and cultivated land. The soil type of the former five is Ochrept, and the nutrient contents in the surface soil of the abandoned field were significantly higher than those of the other land use types. The total organic carbon, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and available nitrogen in the surface soil of the secondary Pinus massoniana forest were higher than those of the shrubbery and grasslands (Wang et al. 2011). The soil types of the cultivated land are mainly Uderts (85%), Ochrept (9%), and Aquept (4.4%) (Ding et al. 2011).
In recent decades, due to agricultural development and road construction around the lake, the ability to remove nutrients and intercept riparian buffer strips has become weak, causing eutrophication to become increasingly serious (Shang and Shang 2005). At present, the types of riparian buffer strips around Lake Chaohu are mainly farmland, grassland, wetland, and forest, and the width of the riparian buffer strips has become narrow.
2.2 Sample collection
In April, July, and October 2013, field investigations were carried out along the shoreline of Lake Chaohu. Eleven sections, including 36 sampling sites with different distances from the shoreline, were chosen, which contained different types of riparian buffer strips, such as grassland, farmland, forest, wetland, and forest/grassland. The number of grassland, farmland, forest, wetland, and forest/grassland sampling sites was 15, 3, 2, 10, and 6, respectively. The interval between the sampling sites in the same section was approximately 50–100 m. The positions and types as well as the dominant vegetable species of the sampling sites are shown in Fig. 1 and Table 1. Soil samples were collected for the analysis of the P species, including Olsen-P and total P (TP), and the P adsorption under the surface of the vegetation at 10–20-cm soil depth at each site. The vegetation analysis was conducted in the field.
2.3 Chemical analysis
The soil samples were air-dried, sieved to < 2 mm, and analyzed for the following parameters.
The Olsen-P was determined by 0.5 M NaHCO3 solution (pH 8.5) in an air-dried sample to extract a solution ratio of 1:20 (Olsen et al. 1954).
The total P (TP) was determined as the difference between ignited and nonignited soils extracted with 0.1 M H2SO4 (Saunders and Williams 1955).
Batch P sorption isotherm experiments were conducted in triplicate for the soil samples under reducing conditions using 0.01 mol L−1 KCl solution containing 0, 0.1, 0.2, 1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 100 mg P L−1 KH2PO4 as sorption solution matrices (modified by Istvanovics 1994). The sealed centrifuge tubes with the mixed solution were shaken on a reciprocal shaker at a speed of 200 cycles min−1 for 24 h at 25 ± 3 °C. The suspension was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 20 min. The supernatants were filtered through a 0.22-μm mixed cellulose ester membrane for determining the soluble reactive phosphorus. The sorption parameters were calculated using the following equations:
Linear equation:
Langmuir equation:
- C :
-
The P concentration in the solution after 24-h equilibrium (mg L−1).
- Q :
-
The amount of P sorbed by the solid phase (mg kg−1).
The EPC0 was measured by the linear equation, where no P sorption or desorption occurs and is equal to the value of C when Q is 0. Qmax was measured by the Langmuir equation (Xiao et al. 2012).
2.4 Biological analysis
The vegetation species composition, relative cover degree, abundance degree, and growing stage were investigated and recorded in the field. Three survey quadrats were randomly chosen for each sampling site, and the areas of each quadrat were 1 m × 1 m, 5 m × 5 m, and 10 m × 10 m for the herbaceous vegetation, shrubs, and forest, respectively.
2.5 Statistical analysis
The Pearson correlation coefficients were determined, and a log-normal regression analysis was performed using SigmaPlot 2000 and SPSS 13.0 for windows. Pearson’s test was performed using the SPSS 18.0 package (SPSS, Chicago, IL), with a value of 0.05 selected for significance. Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) was used to identify the key factors regulating the community structure of the vegetation species with the software CANOCO for Windows, version 4.5 (Ter Braak and Šmilauer 2002).
3 Results and discussion
In all the studied types of riparian buffer strips, the TP content and Qmax value showed a close relationship with the distance from the shoreline, while the Olsen-P content and EPC0 value did not (Fig. 2). In addition, positive relationships existed between the TP content and the Qmax value as well as the Olsen-P content and the EPC0 value (Fig. 3). All these variations could be explained in terms of land use patterns and relevant soil properties. The Olsen-P content and EPC0 value were more affected by the vegetation growing stage with apparent seasonality. Significantly and positively related to the Olsen-P content, the EPC0 value varied greatly after the rainy season in the sediment along the shoreline of Lake Chaohu (Zhou et al. 2011). Furthermore, laboratory experiments demonstrated that vegetative treatment areas generally had elevated EPC0 values, indicating an inevitable fluctuation of available P (Andersen et al. 2015), which provided solid evidence explaining the differences in the seasonal variation modes of the studied variables (Fig. 4).
The CCA analysis, reflecting the relationship between the dominant vegetation species and the environmental variables, showed that the Olsen-P and the EPC0 were closely related to the dominant vegetation species, especially Populus L., Zizania latifolia, and Triticum aestivum (Fig. 5). Different dominant vegetation species could produce different effects on the P sorption behavior in soil. First, decaying vegetation residue was considered an important factor affecting P sorption. Using a radioactive phosphate tracer and laboratory incubations, it was demonstrated that litter inputs, as both long-term inputs and short-term leachate pulses, can decrease the quantity and strength of phosphate sorption, which may increase the biological availability of this key nutrient (Schreeg et al. 2013). As an important soil organic matter (SOM) source, decaying vegetation residue plays a major role in sorption processes. SOM affects P sorption in soils, but P sorption also depends on specific soil properties that are often related to land use (Wang et al. 2013). An increase in P desorption observed after SOM removal indicated that SOM was a potential soil constituent, which increased P binding and limited P leaching from soils (Debicka et al. 2016). Second, vegetation root exudates, to a certain degree, could also influence the P sorption process in soils. The exudation of organic acid has been proposed to be involved in many processes operating in the rhizosphere (Jones 1998). It has been indicated that organic acids, especially low-molecular-weight organic acid, decrease the amount of sorbed P and other sorption parameters, such as the extent of sorption, the energy of sorption, the equilibrium buffering capacity, and the EPC0 in soils (Moradi et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2016). Hence, the decay of vegetation residue and root exudates results in the alteration of P sorption properties, which eventually influences the availability of P in soils.
TP contents and Qmax values are also affected by the land use patterns, such as vegetation coverage. It is well known that the efficiency of nutrient reduction by riparian buffer strips is greatly influenced by the width of the riparian buffer (Moon et al. 2013; Weissteiner et al. 2013), and most available nutrients can be preferentially accumulated and utilized by organisms in riparian buffer strips distant from the shoreline, resulting in a higher TP content in the relevant soils. In addition, in riparian buffer strips distant from the shoreline, woody species and terrestrial vegetation with high densities combined with periodic biomass harvests have great potential to reduce P movement to riparian buffer strips close to the shoreline (Kaoru and Yasuo 1998; Kelly et al. 2007). Adequate infiltration resulting from soil properties and vegetation type at riparian buffer strips distant from the shoreline further facilitated P accumulation (Mankin et al. 2007). All these factors facilitate riparian buffer strips distant from the shoreline to retain a large amount of P, which would be effectively utilized by the organisms in those areas. In addition, the SOM derived from these vegetation types also resulted in a linear increase in the Qmax values of the sediment along the shoreline of Lake Chaohu (Zhou et al. 2011).
Furthermore, the TP contents and Qmax values were largely dependent on the soil properties, which remained unchanged on a seasonal scale (Fig. 4) and had some links with locality in relation to the shoreline (Fig. 2). As a key parameter determining soil properties, the pH value has an important impact on the P sorption characteristics of soils. For example, the pH value of the vegetation-covered land around Lake Chaohu ranged from 7.6 to 8.3, while that of the cultivated land varied between 5.9 and 6.7, with the value of the polder areas that were closer to the shoreline being the lowest (Wang et al. 2011; Ding et al. 2011). Moreover, in our results, soils distant from the shoreline were mainly mineral soils, while those close to the shoreline were mainly peat soils. Peat soils in general have extremely low pH values (Zhou and Li 2002). In short, alterations in land use patterns affect the soil pH value, electrical conductivity, and available N and P as well as the organic carbon content in soils. In turn, these changes in soil properties influence the P sorption capacity, such as Qmax (Yang et al. 2014). Finally, based on data about texture and organic matter, a key parameter representing soil erodibility was given, which was inversely related to the P sorption index (PSI) in the Lake Chaohu watershed (Zhou and Gao 2011). Interestingly, in the sediment along the shoreline of Lake Chaohu, a significantly positive relationship was found between the PSI and the Qmax value (Zhou et al. 2011). Thus, the Qmax value in our results might not only indicate the capacity of soil to buffer dissolved phosphorus in runoff but also reflect erodibility, which is largely dependent on soil texture, thereby implying a risk of particulate P discharge into Lake Chaohu through soil erosion.
4 Conclusions
The TP content and Qmax value had similar variation trends, both of which were closely correlated with the distance from the shoreline. However, the Olsen-P content and EPC0 value were mainly regulated by the land use pattern (vegetation species in particular). All these facts could be indirectly indicated by the positive relationship between the TP content and the Qmax value as well as the Olsen-P content and the EPC0 value. These changes could be attributed to land use patterns, resulting in the alteration of the soil pH value, electrical conductivity, available N and P, organic carbon content, and the erodibility in the soils. These results provide insight into the prevention of P leaching through changes in land use patterns in riparian buffer strips. Wetlands and forests with grass are recommended as the main land use patterns for adjusting the EPC0 value and minimizing P leaching from soils.
References
Andersen DS, Helmers MJ, Burns RT (2015) Phosphorus sorption capacity of six Iowa soils before and after five years of use as vegetative treatment areas. Appl Eng Agric 31(4):611–620
Brian M, Hickey C, Doran B (2004) A review of the efficiency of buffer strips for the maintenance and enhancement of riparian ecosystems. Water Qual Res J Can 39(3):311–317
De LS, Glanville HC, Marshall MR, Prysor AW, Jones DL (2018) Quantifying the contribution of riparian soils to the provision of ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ 624:807–819
Debicka M, Kocowicz A, Weber J, Jamroz E (2016) Organic matter effects on phosphorus sorption in sandy soils. Arch Agron Soil Sci 62(6):840–855
Ding Z, Peng H, Gao S (2011) Analysis and suggestion of soil location monitoring data in Chaohu City. Anhui Agri Sci Bull 17(13):105–107
Giesler R, Andersson T, Lövgren L, Persson P (2005) Phosphate sorption in aluminum- and iron-rich humus soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:77–86
Hoffmann CC, Kjaergaard C, Uusi-Kämppä J, Hansen HC, Kronvang B (2009) Phosphorus retention in riparian buffers: review of their efficiency. J Environ Qual 38(5):1942–1955
Istvanovics V (1994) Fractional composition, adsorption and release of sediment phosphorus in the Kis-Balaton reservoir. Water Res 28(3):717–726
Izydorczyk K, Michalska-Hejduk D, Jarosiewicz P, Bydałek F, Frątczak W (2018) Extensive grasslands as an effective measure for nitrate and phosphate reduction from highly polluted subsurface flow-case studies from Central Poland. Agr Water Manage 203:240–250
Jones DL (1998) Organic acids in the rhizospere – a critical review. Plant Soil 205(1):25–44
Kaoru A, Yasuo O (1998) Comparison of useful terrestrial and aquatic plant species for removal of nitrogen and phosphorus from domestic wastewater. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 44(4):599–607
Kelly JM, Kovar JL, Sokolowsky R, Moorman TB (2007) Phosphorus uptake during four years by different vegetative cover types in a riparian buffer. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 78(3):239–251
Kronvang B, Bechman M, Lundekvam H, Behrendt H, Rubæk GH, Schoumans OF, Syversen N, Andersen HE, Hoffmann CC (2005) Phosphorus losses from agricultural areas in river basins: effects and uncertainties of targeted mitigation measures. J Environ Qual 34:2129–2144
Kyehan L, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC, Mickelson SK (2000) Multispecies riparian buffers trap sediment and nutrients during rainfall simulations. J Environ Qual 29(4):1200–1205
Li M, Hou YL, Zhu B (2007) Phosphorus sorption-desorption by purple soils of China in relation to their properties. Aust J Soil Res 45:182–189
Mankin KR, Ngandu DM, Barden CJ, Hutchinson SL, Geyer WA (2007) Grass-shrub riparian buffer removal of sediment, phosphorus, and nitrogen from simulated runoff. J Am Water Resour As 43(5):1108–1116
Moon J, Jung Y, Lee T, Kim TC, Rho P, Shin YC, Ryu J, Lim KJ (2013) Determining the effective width of riparian buffers in Korean watersheds using the swat model. Environ Eng Manag J 12(11):2249–2260
Moradi N, Sadaghiani MHR, Sepehr E (2012) Effects of low-molecular-weight organic acids on phosphorus sorption characteristics in some calcareous soils. Turk J Agric For 36(4):459–468
Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. In: USDA circular. USDA, Washington DC, p 939
Saunders WMH, Williams EG (1955) Observations on the determination of total organic phosphorus in soils. J Soil Sci 6:254–267
Schreeg LA, Mack MC, Turner BL (2013) Leaf litter inputs decrease phosphate sorption in a strongly weathered tropical soil over two time scales. Biogeochemistry 113:507–524
Shang GP, Shang JC (2005) Causes and control countermeasures of eutrophication in Chaohu Lake, China. Chin Geogr Sci 15:348–354
Shen C, Liao Q, Bootsma HA, Troy CD, Cannon D (2018) Regulation of plankton and nutrient dynamics by profundal quagga mussels in Lake Michigan: a one-dimensional model. Hydrobiologia 815(1):47–63
Stutter MI, Langan SJ, Lunsdom DG (2009) Vegetated buffer strips can lead to increased release of phosphorus to waters: a biogeochemical assessment of the mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol 43:1858–1863
Subramaniam V, Singh BR (1997) Phosphorus supplying capacity of heavily fertilized soils .1. Phosphorus adsorption characteristics and phosphorus fractionation. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 47:115–122
Syversen N (2005) Effect and design of buffer zones in the Nordic climate: the influence of width, amount of surface runoff, seasonal variation and vegetation type on retention efficiency for nutrient and particle runoff. Ecol Eng 24:483–490
Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer power, Ithaca, N.Y., USA
Wang X, Chang L, Li H, Zhang Q (2011) Study on community characteristics and soil properties of typical vegetations in Chaohu hill region. Soils 43(6):981–986
Wang XY, Zhang LP, Zhang FF, Zhang HS, Mei DL (2013) Phosphorus adsorption by soils from four land use patterns. Asian J Chem 25(1):282–286
Wang YZ, Whalen JK, Chen X, Cao YH, Huang B, Lu CY, Shi Y (2016) Mechanisms for altering phosphorus sorption characteristics induced by organic acids. Can J Soil Sci 96:289–298
Weissteiner CJ, Bouraoui F, Aloe A (2013) Reduction of nitrogen and phosphorus loads to European rivers by riparian buffer zones. Knowl Manag Aquat Ec 408:08
Xiao WJ, Song CL, Cao XY, Zhou YY (2012) Effects of air-drying on phosphorus sorption in shallow lake sediment, China. Fresenius Environ Bull 21(3A):672–678
Xu MQ, Cao H, Xie P, Deng DG, Feng WS, Xu H (2005) The temporal and spatial distribution, composition and abundance of Protozoa in Chaohu Lake, China: relationship with eutrophication. Eur J Protistol 41:183–192
Yang GR, Hao XY, Li CL, Li YM (2014) Effect of land use on soil phosphorus sorption-desorption under intensive agricultural practices in plastic-film greenhouses. Pedosphere 24(3):367–377
Zak D, Kronvang B, Carstensen MV, Hoffmann CC, Kjeldgaard A, Larsen SE, Audet J, Egemose S, Jorgensen CA, Feuerbach P, Gertz F, Jensen HS (2018) Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from agricultural runoff in integrated buffer zones. Environ Sci Technol 52:6508–6517
Zhang W, Faulkner JW, Giri SK, Geohring LD, Steenhuis TS (2010a) Effect of soil reduction on phosphorus sorption of an organic-rich silt loam. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:240–249
Zhang X, Liu X, Zhang M, Dahlgren RA, Eitzel M (2010b) Review of vegetated buffers and a meta-analysis of their mitigation efficacy in reducing nonpoint source pollution. J Environ Qual 39(1):76–84
Zhou C, Zhou Y, Chen X, Liu Y, Cao X, Song C (2011) Linkage between land use patterns and sediment phosphorus sorption behaviors along shoreline of a Chinese large shallow lake (Lake Chaohu). Knowl Manag Aquat Ec 34(403):81–85
Zhou H, Gao C (2011) Assessing the risk of phosphorus loss and identifying critical source areas in the Chaohu Lake watershed, China. Environ Manag 48(5):1033–1043
Zhou M, Li Y (2002) Phosphorus-sorption characteristics of calcareous soils and limestone from the southern Everglades and adjacent farmlands. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1404–1412
Acknowledgments
We thank Siyang Wang, Zijun Zhou, Jian Xiao, and Yao Zhang for their help with sampling.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41877381; 41573110; 41611540341), the Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (2017ZX07603), and the State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology (2016FBZ07).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Zhenli He
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cao, X., Chen, X., Song, C. et al. Comparison of phosphorus sorption characteristics in the soils of riparian buffer strips with different land use patterns and distances from the shoreline around Lake Chaohu. J Soils Sediments 19, 2322–2329 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-02232-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-02232-z