Abstract
The concentrations of anhydrosugars (levoglucosan, mannosan, and galactosan), polyols (inositol, xylitol, sorbitol, and mannitol), and glucose were measured in PM1 and PM10 samples collected during 1 year at a traffic site in the city of Elche (southeastern Spain). Levoglucosan, mannosan, and galactosan were mainly found in the PM1 fraction since they are mainly emitted from biomass burning (BB). Likewise, inositol, xylitol, and sorbitol were primarily distributed in the fine mode, suggesting a non-negligible contribution from anthropogenic sources (specifically BB) to the levels of these compounds. This was supported by their seasonal variations, with higher concentrations during winter, and their correlations with levoglucosan concentrations. The average contributions of biomass burning and biogenic sources to OC and PM levels were calculated using levoglucosan and mannitol, respectively, as tracers. On average, BB accounted for 12% and 16% of the OC in PM1 and PM10, while the estimated contribution of fungal spores to OC and PM10 levels was 1.2 and 0.8%, respectively. The results of the present study suggest that, at least in the study area, most sugar alcohols are not appropriate tracers of biogenic emissions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Characterizing the chemical composition of atmospheric aerosols is essential to identify pollution sources, evaluate their effects on human health and ecosystems, and associate aerosol optical properties with visibility impairment and climate change (Chow et al. 2015). Aerosols consist of organic and inorganic species. Organic matter is a major constituent of atmospheric particulate matter (PM), accounting for 20–90% of submicron particles (Jiménez et al. 2009). The organic fraction of atmospheric aerosols includes primary and secondary organic components. Primary organic aerosols are directly emitted by different sources including fossil fuel combustion, biomass burning, and biogenic emissions, while secondary organic aerosols are formed by atmospheric oxidation of gaseous precursors of both biogenic and anthropogenic origin (Jiménez et al. 2009; Samaké et al. 2020).
Organic aerosols contain chemical species that can be used as tracers of specific pollution sources. Among these species, sugar compounds (also named carbohydrates or saccharides) have received increased attention in recent years (Gonçalves et al. 2021; Samaké et al. 2020; Theodosi et al. 2018; Zhu et al. 2022) since they are reliable markers of different biogenic and anthropogenic sources and can provide information on the transport routes of atmospheric particles (Fraser and Lakshmanan 2000; Marynowski and Simoneit 2022; Rathnayake et al. 2016; Vincenti et al. 2022). Anhydrosaccharides (specifically levoglucosan and its isomers mannosan and galactosan) are pyrolytic degradation products of cellulose and hemicellulose (Marynowski and Simoneit 2022; Vicente and Alves 2018; Vincenti et al. 2022) and have been widely used as tracers of biomass burning (de Oliveira Alves et al. 2015; Galindo et al. 2021; Monteiro et al. 2018; Zhu et al. 2022). Sugar alcohols mainly come from fungal spores (e.g., mannitol and arabitol; Bauer et al. 2008) and soil dust (e.g., sorbitol and xylitol; Simoneit et al. 2004), while primary saccharides, such as glucose and sucrose, can be used as tracers of plant materials (e.g., pollen and plant fragments) and emissions from soils (Fu et al. 2012; Simoneit et al. 2004; Vincenti et al. 2022; Zhu et al. 2022). Although it has been reported that these last two classes of carbohydrates can also be emitted from biomass burning (Simoneit et al. 2004; Vincenti et al. 2022; Yttri et al. 2007), they have been used to estimate the influence of primary biogenic emissions (i.e., particles released into the atmosphere from the biosphere, including pollen and plant debris, fungal spores, or bacteria) to the levels of organic carbon and PM in a number of previous works (Cao et al. 2022; Casotto et al. 2023; Gonçalves et al. 2021; Jia et al. 2010; Rathnayake et al. 2016; Samaké et al. 2019a; Xu et al. 2020). Despite all this, there are still few studies focusing on the sugar content of atmospheric aerosols in the Mediterranean basin. In a work performed at a remote site in Crete, Theodosi et al. (2018) analyzed the carbohydrate content of PM10 samples collected over a 2-year period and estimated an annual average contribution from biomass burning to organic carbon of 13%. Samaké et al. (2019a,b) used the concentrations of different polyols and glucose to evaluate the influence of primary biogenic emissions on the levels of organic matter in PM10 at urban and rural sites in France. In Spain, anhydrosugars and glucose, together with other organic markers, were simultaneously measured in Granada and Barcelona (van Droogue et al. 2022) in order to assess the importance of primary and secondary organic aerosols under different meteorological conditions. A wide range of sugar compounds were analyzed in the ambient air of León (northwest of Spain) during 1 year with the aim of studying the relationship between their concentrations and meteorological factors, mainly rainfall.
In all of the mentioned studies, carbohydrate concentrations were only measured in PM10 samples. In fact, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the sugar content was simultaneously analyzed in two size fractions (PM1 and PM10) in the western Mediterranean. The knowledge of the size distribution of these molecular markers can provide further insights into their sources. The main purpose of the present work is to determine the concentration of anhydrosugars, sugars, and sugar alcohols in PM1 and PM10 samples in order to evaluate the influence of biomass burning and biogenic sources at a typical Mediterranean urban site.
Materials and methods
Sample collection
Twenty-four-hour PM1 and PM10 samples were collected three times a week using two Derenda 3.1 low-volume samplers (2.3 m3 h−1) according to the EN 12341 European Norm (CEN/TC 264 2023). Samplers were installed on the first floor of a seven-story building occupied by the local Environmental Office. The measurement site was located in the city center of Elche (Spain), on a street having two lanes on the same direction. One of the lanes was converted into a bus lane by mid-2021, leaving only one lane for general traffic. A detailed description of the characteristics of the study area can be found in Nicolás et al. (2020).
Around 160 samples of each fraction were collected onto quartz fiber filters between November 2020 and November 2021. Mass concentrations were determined gravimetrically using an Ohaus AP250D analytical balance. Filters were kept in controlled conditions (20 ± 1 °C and 50 ± 5% relative humidity) for at least 24 h before weighting.
Chemical analyses
A quarter of each filter was extracted in 3.5 ml of ultrapure water by ultrasonic bath agitation for 45 min. The extracts were then filtered through 0.45 µm syringe filters (13 mm) to remove insoluble materials before analysis. Sugar anhydrides (levoglucosan, mannosan, and galactosan), sugar alcohols (inositol, xylitol, sorbitol, and mannitol), and glucose were quantified by high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD). A Thermo Scientific Dionex Integrion system equipped with a two-way valve was used. This setting allows to alternately run two NaOH solutions with different concentrations. The analytical column was a 250 × 4 mm Dionex Carbopac PA10, and runs were initiated with 25 mM NaOH for 25 min at a flow rate of 0.5 ml min−1. Then, the column was cleaned with 200 mM NaOH for 8 min and re-equilibrated with 25 mM NaOH for 17 min before the injection of the next sample. For the amperometric detection, a gold working electrode was used.
The content of organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) of the samples was quantified using the thermal-optical transmittance instrument from Sunset Laboratory. A rectangular filter punch of 1.5 cm2 was cut from each filter and analyzed using the EUSAAR2 protocol (Cavalli and Putaud 2010).
Field (n = 12) and laboratory blanks (n = 24) were also analyzed by the different techniques, and the concentrations were subtracted from the values obtained for each sample. The limits of detection (LOD) of sugar compounds were determined as the minimum concentration that was visible in the chromatogram and produced a peak height at least three times the signal-to-noise ratio. LODs ranged from 0.002 to 0.04 µg ml−1.
Gaseous pollutant concentrations and meteorological variables
Daily concentrations of gaseous pollutants and meteorological data were obtained from two stations of the Air Quality Regional Network located ~ 2 km and 3.5 km, respectively, from the sampling site. During the measurement period, the average temperature was 19.5 °C, ranging from 13.6 °C in winter to 26.3 °C in summer. The accumulated precipitation during the sampling days was only 118 mm and was primarily concentrated in spring (~100 mm).
Results and discussion
Average concentrations and size distribution of saccharides
Mean concentrations of PM, carbonaceous species, and carbohydrates during the sampling period are shown in Table 1. Galactosan, mannosan, xylitol, and sorbitol were not detected in a significant number of samples (between 18 and 48%). For this reason, values below detection limits were replaced by half of the minimum detected value to calculate the annual mean concentration.
The carbonaceous fraction (OC + EC) accounted for 22% and 47%, respectively, of the PM10 and PM1 average mass concentrations, in agreement with the results previously observed at the same sampling site (Clemente et al. 2022). The value for PM10 was in the range of those reported for other urban and suburban areas, which generally vary between 20 and 35% depending on the season of the year and the specific characteristics of the sampling site (Di Vaio et al. 2016; Kılavuz et al. 2019; Megido et al. 2016; Waked et al. 2014). As expected, the contribution of carbonaceous species to PM1 levels was notably higher than that of PM10, since a significant portion of the coarse fraction is made up of mineral dust and sea salt, which are minor components of submicron particles (Ariola et al. 2006; Galindo et al. 2020; Titos et al. 2014).
Biomass burning (BB) tracers (levoglucosan, mannosan, and galactosan) generally showed lower concentrations than those reported in a number of previous works (Table 2). For instance, in the present study, the mean levoglucosan concentration in the PM10 fraction was 34 ng m−3, varying between 14 ng m−3 in summer (June, July, and August) and 68 ng m−3 in winter (December, January, and February), while at other urban sites in Europe, levoglucosan levels were commonly much higher, particularly during winter. This indicates lower PM emissions from residential wood burning in the city of Elche, which is partly due to its mild winter temperatures compared to more northern European regions. Surprisingly, the average annual levoglucosan concentration measured in the present study was higher than that obtained in the city of León (Oduber et al. 2021), located in the northwest of Spain, despite winters being much colder and longer in León (5 ± 3 °C) than in Elche.
The concentrations of sugar alcohols measured in Elche were in general much lower than the values found at other urban sites worldwide, although concentrations show substantial site-to-site differences. For example, Gonçalves et al. (2021) reported concentrations of xylitol in PM10 ranging from 3 ng m−3 in summer to 20 ng m−3 in winter at an urban background site in Coimbra (Portugal), while mannitol concentrations were around 20 ng m−3 during both summer and winter. In a study performed at different urban sites in Iowa, Rathnayake et al. (2016) also found mannitol levels remarkably higher than the ones registered in Elche (32 ng m−3). In contrast, average concentrations measured in PM2.5 at an urban site in Brno (Czech Republic) were between 1.8 and 4.3 ng m−3 for inositol, 1.0 and 4.2 ng m−3 for sorbitol, and 1.6 and 7.4 ng m−3 for mannitol, depending of the season of the year (Mikuška et al. 2017). Similarly, the levels of different polyols recently reported by Cao et al. (2022) and Kang et al. (2018) in Nanjing and Beijing (China), respectively, for the PM2.5 fraction were more comparable to the ones found in the present study for PM1.
The average concentration of glucose in PM10 (20 ng m−3) was in the lower range of those measured at other urban sites. The mean concentration of glucose in TSP registered in Belgrade was 22 ng m−3 (Zangrando et al. 2016), while higher concentrations were reported in PM10 in Iowa (32 ng m−3; Rathnayake et al. 2016), the Polish city of Sosnowiec (between 63 ng m−3 in winter and 291 ng m−3 in spring; Marynowski et al. 2020) and Beijing (46 ng m−3; Liang et al. 2016).
Since sugars and sugar alcohols are commonly used as tracers of primary biogenic aerosols containing pollen, plant debris, and fungal spores, the relatively low levels measured in this study suggest a limited contribution from biogenic sources to organic aerosols at our sampling site, most likely due to the lack of vegetation cover in nearby areas. Vegetation coverage has been found to affect the levels of glucose and sugar alcohols such as mannitol, as reported by Rathnayake et al. (2016), who found higher glucose and mannitol concentrations in forested rural areas of the Midwestern United States than at urban sites. The lower emissions from wood burning could also be a reason for the lower levels of some polyols observed in this study compared to other urban locations, since BB has been identified as a possible source of these compounds, as commented in the Introduction.
Figure 1 shows the distribution of PM and the measured chemical components between PM1 and PM10-1. Approximately two-thirds of PM was distributed in the supermicron fraction, in line with other studies performed in the Mediterranean basin (Pikridas et al. 2018; Titos et al. 2014). This is due to a significant contribution from road dust resuspension and Saharan mineral dust to the PM10-1 fraction (Nicolás et al. 2009; Titos et al. 2014). OC and EC were mainly found in the submicron fraction, which was not unexpected since at the sampling site they are mainly associated to primary emissions from fossil fuel combustion and, in the case of OC, to secondary organic aerosol formation, and both processes mostly generate fine-mode particles (Jaffrezo et al. 2005).
On average, more than 60% of monosaccharide anhydrides were associated with submicron particles due to their origin from BB emissions (Blumberger et al. 2019). The presence of these compounds in particles larger than 1 μm could be associated to crop waste burning, which occurs at lower temperatures than wood burning and tends to generate coarser particles (Blumberger et al. 2019). This might be the reason why only around 40% of levoglucosan was distributed in the submicron fraction during summer when emissions from wood burning are expected to be very low.
Polyols, except mannitol, were mainly distributed in the fine fraction, which suggests that BB could be a likely source of these compounds, as already proposed by other studies (Liang et al. 2016; Yttri et al. 2007). In contrast, the predominant association of mannitol with the coarse fraction points to primary biogenic emissions (fungal spores) as a major source of this polyol (Carvalho et al. 2003).
Almost 70% of glucose was associated with particles larger than 1 μm, most likely because it mainly comes from plant fragments and soils. The size distributions of glucose have been examined in some previous works with contrasting results. In a recent work performed in Beijing (China) (Xu et al. 2020), glucose was also present primarily in the coarse fraction. Similar results were reported by Samaké et al. (2019b) in France and by Carvalho et al. (2003) in a Finnish forest. However, glucose was found to be more abundant in fine particles at a suburban site in Elverum (Norway) during winter (Yttri et al. 2007) and at the research station Melpitz, located in an agricultural area in Germany (Carvalho et al. 2003). Glucose in fine particles has been associated to its presence in fragmented pollen grains (Yttri et al. 2007).
Seasonal variability of saccharide compounds
Table 3 presents seasonal concentrations of the analyzed carbohydrates in both PM1 and PM10. The levels of anhydrosugars were maxima in winter and minima during summer, as widely reported in the literature (Cao et al. 2022; Fu et al. 2012; Gonçalves et al. 2021; Jia et al. 2010; Křůmal et al. 2010; Marynowski et al. 2020). The use of wood burning for domestic heating only occurs to a significant extent during the cold season and progressively decreases with increasing temperature, as suggested by the negative correlations between levoglucosan, mannosan, and galactosan, and ambient temperature (r between 0.70 and 0.76, following a power law). Additionally, agricultural waste burning in the study area is not generally allowed between early June and mid-October. Similar results from the correlation analysis between levoglucosan concentrations and ambient temperature were obtained by Perrino et al. (2019) in Rome. On the other hand, anhydrosaccharides showed moderate negative correlations with ozone concentrations (r between 0.55 and 0.64). The oxidation with OH radicals, formed from ozone photolysis, has been proposed as the dominant removal mechanism for levoglucosan and its isomers (Bhattarai et al. 2019). Therefore, these results suggest that the degradation of anhydrosaccharides during summer under strong oxidation conditions could contribute to the lower concentrations during this season, as pointed out in previous studies (Xiao et al. 2018).
Glucose concentrations in both PM fractions were highest from March to early June as a result of the spring blooming season, in agreement with the findings of previous studies (Fu et al. 2012; Oduber et al. 2021; Xu et al. 2020).
With the exception of mannitol in the PM10 fraction, the concentrations of polyols at the sampling site were maxima during winter. This outcome could be attributed to higher emission rates of these compounds from biomass burning during the cold months. To explore this further, correlations between the concentrations of polyols and levoglucosan were performed. The results from this analysis (Table 4) suggest that biomass combustion can indeed be considered as a non-negligible source of polyols in the fine mode, particularly for xylitol. This observation is in line with the outcomes of Gonçalves et al. (2021) who also found strong correlations between xylitol and levoglucosan at roadside and urban background sites in Coimbra (Portugal).
Mannitol in PM10 did not correlate with levoglucosan, which indicates that biomass burning is not a significant source of this compound, at least in the coarse fraction. In fact, higher concentrations of PM10-bound mannitol were found during summer and spring, suggesting that biogenic emissions are the most important source of this compound. The positive correlation between mannitol and glucose in PM10 (r = 0.46, p < 0.05) indicates that both components share some common origin. Previous studies have also found a relationship between mannitol and glucose. For instance, Samaké et al. (2019b) observed the same seasonal cycle for both compounds, with maximum concentrations in spring, pointing to elevated biogenic emissions during this season due to higher biological metabolic activities. Alternatively, Oduber et al. (2021) found a significant correlation between mannitol and pollen concentrations, probably because this polyol is also present in different families of plants (Burshtein et al. 2011).
Estimations of the contribution of biomass burning and biogenic emissions
Emission ratios can be used to estimate the contribution of different sources to PM levels (Li et al. 2021; Shahid et al. 2019; Titos et al. 2017). This approach assumes a fixed emission ratio between a compound emitted from a certain source and a tracer from that source (Li et al. 2021). Although the macro-tracer method has been extensively applied to estimate the contribution of BB to OC and PM concentrations (e.g., Galindo et al. 2021; Kirchsteiger et al. 2020; Stracquadanio et al. 2019; Theodosi et al. 2018), it is important to bear in mind that tracer emissions depend on multiple factors such as the type of biomass burned, moisture content, and combustion conditions, leading to uncertainty in the quantification of the real contribution of BB to aerosol levels. The protocol used to determine OC concentrations also adds uncertainty to estimates of the BB contribution since emission ratios are based on OC measurements.
In the present work, OC/levoglucosan ratios at the sampling site were optimized using the method described by Nirmalkar et al. (2020) in order to estimate the contribution of biomass burning to OC concentrations in both PM1 and PM10. The first step of this approach consists of calculating the fraction of OC due to biomass burning emissions (OCBB) by multiplying levoglucosan concentrations by a given OC/levoglucosan ratio. Second, the proportion of OC non-attributable to biomass burning (OCnon-BB) was estimated by subtracting OCBB from the total OC. Finally, OCnon-BB was correlated against levoglucosan. If the estimated OCnon-bb does not contain OC from biomass burning, both the regression slope and R2 will be close to zero. As a starting point for this calculation, we used the ratio of 12.3 obtained for a residential area close to the sampling site (Galindo et al. 2021). Then, the value of this ratio was progressively increased until both the regression slope and R2 were close to zero. The optimized OC/levoglucosan ratio for our measurement site was 24 for both PM1 and PM10 (Fig. 2). This ratio was considerably higher than that estimated for PM10 at the residential site located in the surroundings of the city of Elche (Galindo et al. 2021). This could be explained considering that biomass combustion mainly occurs outside the city, and emissions from this source are then transported to the city center. During transport, the loss of levoglucosan by photochemical aging (Bhattarai et al. 2019; Vicente and Alves 2018) may lead to an increase in the OC/levoglucosan ratio.
The concentrations of OC from biomass burning in both PM1 and PM10 estimated using a conversion factor of 24 are presented in Table 5. The ratios between levoglucosan and its isomers, commonly used to identify the type of wood burnt (Janoszka and Czaplicka 2022; Shahid et al. 2019), are also shown. Higher levoglucosan/mannosan and levoglucosan/galactosan ratios have been reported for hard wood burning than for soft wood burning (Fine et al. 2004; Schmidl et al. 2011; Vicente and Alves 2018). These ratios were only calculated for the winter period, when biomass burning accounts for the highest percentage of measured concentrations.
The average contribution of BB to OC was comparable to that calculated for the same site using soluble potassium as a tracer for this source (15% three-year average; Galindo et al. 2019). However, it was somewhat lower than that found at the residential area close to the urban sampling site (30% during winter; Galindo et al. 2021), where wood combustion for house heating is frequent on cold days. The values obtained in the present study were lower than those reported for other urban areas in Europe, even those located in southern European countries. For instance, Benetello et al. (2017) calculated a BB contribution of 56% to OC in PM2.5 during winter in Mestre, while in Rome, biomass burning made up between 38 and 50% of OC in PM10 during the heating period (Perrino et al. 2019). In the present study, OC from BB contributed 6% and 3%, respectively, to PM1 and PM10 mean concentrations, whereas Pio et al. (2020) reported average contributions of 25% to PM2.5 and 19% to PM10 in Porto (Portugal). These outcomes point to a limited impact of BB emissions on the levels of OC and PM10 in our study area. In fact, PM10 and levoglucosan concentrations showed a different temporal behavior (Fig. 3). The most likely reasons are (1) the use of biomass as a heating source is not common in the urban area, as commented above, and (2) winters are characterized by mild temperatures and residential heating is greatly reduced during this season. It is important to bear in mind that the average winter temperature during the study period was almost 14 °C.
The ratios between levoglucosan and its isomers (Table 5) were the same as those calculated for the residential area located close to the urban sampling site (Galindo et al. 2021) and point to the use of softwood as fuel. Previous works performed in the Iberian Peninsula have also reported the predominant use of softwood for house heating (van Drooge et al. 2022; Pio et al. 2022).
Similarly to the use of levoglucosan as a tracer to estimate the contribution from biomass burning, mannitol has been used in previous works to quantitatively evaluate the contribution of fungal spores to OC and PM10 concentrations (Gonçalves et al. 2021; Mendes Emygdio et al. 2018). The conversion factors proposed by Bauer et al. (2002, 2008) were used. These factors were 1.7 pg mannitol/spore, 33 pg fresh mass PM10/spore, and 13 pg C/spore. The average contribution of fungal spores to PM10 and OC concentrations in Elche was 1.2 and 0.8%, respectively, with minimum values in winter (0.9 and 0.5%, respectively) and maximum in spring (1.4 and 0.9%, respectively). These values are much lower than those found at other urban areas (Gonçalves et al. 2021; Mendes Emygdio et al. 2018), which suggests that fungal spores are significantly less abundant at our sampling site. In spite of this, it is important to mention that these estimates should be considered with caution since climate differences and differences in fungal species between sites may lead to different mannitol concentrations. Therefore, there are inherent uncertainties associated with the use of this approach.
Conclusions
The average concentrations of biomass burning tracers (levoglucosan, mannosan, and galactosan) in PM1 and PM10 samples collected in the city center of Elche were low compared with those reported for other urban sites in Europe, indicating low PM emissions from this source in the study area. The reasons are that the duration of the heating period is very low (due to mild winter temperatures) and that wood is not commonly used as fuel for house heating in the city. Although sugar alcohols are thought to come mainly from biological sources, the seasonal variation of inositol, xylitol, and sorbitol at the sampling site suggests a significant contribution of biomass burning emissions. The mass size distribution of these polyols, with a larger proportion in the fine mode, and the significant correlation coefficients with levoglucosan support this hypothesis. On the other hand, mannitol and glucose were mainly distributed in the coarse fraction, and their seasonal patterns were characterized by higher levels in spring and/or summer, which indicates that they originate primarily from biogenic emissions. Levoglucosan and mannitol were used as tracers to quantitatively estimate the contribution from biomass burning and fungal spores to OC and PM concentrations. Fungal spores contributed 1.2% to PM10 and 0.8% to OC. Alternatively, the average contribution of OC from biomass burning to PM1 and PM10 was 6% and 3%, respectively. These results suggest a limited contribution of biomass burning emissions to PM levels in the study area, which implies that, although all sources have to be considered in order to reduce PM pollution in the city, mitigation measures should prioritize other anthropogenic sources with a greater impact on aerosol concentrations. On the other hand, the findings of the present study suggest that sugar alcohols other than mannitol come primarily from biomass burning, indicating they are not suitable markers of biogenic sources, at least in the study area. Further research using receptor models such as Positive Matrix Factorization is needed in order to confirm these results.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ariola V, D’Alessandro A, Lucarelli F, Marcazzan G, Mazzei F, Nava S, Garcia-Orellana I, Prati P, Valli G, Vecchi R, Zucchiatti A (2006) Elemental characterization of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 in the town of Genoa (Italy). Atmos Environ 62:226–232
Bauer H, Kasper-Giebl A, Lo M (2002) The contribution of bacteria and fungal spores to the organic carbon content of cloud water, precipitation and aerosols. Atmos Res 64:109–119
Bauer H, Claeys M, Vermeylen R, Schueller E, Weinke G, Berger A, Puxbaum H (2008) Arabitol and mannitol as tracers for the quantification of airborne fungal spores. Atmos Environ 42:588–593
Benetello F, Squizzato S, Hofer A, Masiol M, Khan MB, Piazzalunga A et al (2017) Estimation of local and external contributions of biomass burning to PM2.5 in an industrial zone included in a large urban settlement. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:2100–2115
Bhattarai H, Saikawa E, Wan X, Zhu H, Ram K, Gao S, Kang S, Zhang Q, Zhang Y, Wu G, Wang X, Kawamura K, Fu P, Cong Z (2019) Levoglucosan as a tracer of biomass burning: recent progress and perspectives. Atmos Res 220:20–33
Blumberger ZI, Vasanits-Zsigrai A, Farkas G, Salma I (2019) Mass size distribution of major monosaccharide anhydrides and mass contribution of biomass burning. Atmos Res 220:1–9
Burshtein N, Lang-Yona N, Rudich Y (2011) Ergosterol, arabitol and mannitol as tracers for biogenic aerosols in the eastern Mediterranean. Atmos Chem Phys 11:829–839
Cao M, Chen M, Ge P, Cui Y, Li W (2022) Seasonal variation, source contribution, and impact factors of biogenic organic aerosols in PM2.5 in Nanjing, China. Sci Total Environ 843:156875
Carvalho A, Pio C, Santos C (2003) Water-soluble hydroxylated organic compounds in German and Finnish aerosols. Atmos Environ 37:1775–1783
Casotto R, Skiba A, Rauber M, Strähl J, Tobler A, Bhattu D et al (2023) Organic aerosol sources in Krakow, Poland, before implementation of a solid fuel residential heating ban. Sci Total Environ 855:158655
Cavalli F, Putaud JP (2010) Toward a standardized thermal-optical protocol for measuring atmospheric organic and elemental carbon: the EUSAAR protocol. Atmos Meas Tech 3:79–89
Chow JC, Lowenthal DH, Chen LWA, Wang X, Watson JG (2015) Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review. Air Qual Atmos Health 8:243–263
CEN/TC 264 (2023) EN12341:2023 Ambient air - Standard gravimetric measurement method for the determination of the PM10 or PM2.5 mass concentration of suspended particulate matter.
Clemente Á, Yubero E, Nicolás JF, Caballero S, Crespo J, Galindo N (2022) Changes in the concentration and composition of urban aerosols during the COVID-19 lockdown. Environ Res 203:111788
Cordell RL, Mazet M, Dechoux C, Hama SML, Staelens J, Hofman J et al (2016) Evaluation of biomass burning across North West Europe and its impact on air quality. Atmos Environ 141:276–286
de Oliveira Alves N, Brito J, Caumo S, Arana A, de Souza HS, Artaxo P et al (2015) Biomass burning in the Amazon region: aerosol source apportionment and associated health risk assessment. Atmos Environ 120:277–285
Di Vaio P, Magli E, Barbato F, Caliendo G, Cocozziello B, Corvino A et al (2016) Chemical composition of PM10 at urban sites in Naples (Italy). Atmosphere 7:163
Fine PM, Cass GR, Simoneit BR (2004) Chemical characterization of fine particle emissions from the woodstove combustion of prevalent United States tree species. Environ Eng Sci 21:705–721
Fraser MP, Lakshmanan K (2000) Using levoglucosan as a molecular marker for the long-range transport of biomass combustion aerosols. Environ Sci Technol 34:4560–4564
Fu P, Kawamura K, Kobayashi M, Simoneit BRT (2012) Seasonal variations of sugars in atmospheric particulate matter from Gosan, Jeju Island: significant contributions of airborne pollen and Asian dust in spring. Atmos Environ 55:234–239
Fuller GW, Tremper AH, Baker TD, Ytri KE, Butterfield D (2014) Contribution of wood burning to PM10 in London. Atmos Environ 87:87–94
Galindo N, Yubero E, Clemente Á, Nicolás JF, Navarro-Selma B, Crespo J (2019) Insights into the origin and evolution of carbonaceous aerosols in a Mediterranean urban environment. Chemosphere 235:636–642
Galindo N, Yubero E, Clemente Á, Nicolás JF, Varea M, Crespo J (2020) PM events and changes in the chemical composition of urban aerosols: a case study in the western Mediterranean. Chemosphere 244:125520
Galindo N, Clemente Á, Yubero E, Nicolás JF, Crespo J (2021) PM10 chemical composition at a residential site in the western Mediterranean: estimation of the contribution of biomass burning from levoglucosan and its isomers. Environ Res 196:110394
Gonçalves C, CasottiRienda I, Pina N, Gama C, Nunes T, Tchepel O, Alves C (2021) PM10-bound sugars: chemical composition, sources and seasonal variations. Atmosphere 12:194
Jaffrezo JL, Aymoz G, Cozic J (2005) Size distribution of EC and OC in the aerosol of Alpine valleys during summer and winter. Atmos Chem Phys 5:2915–2925
Janoszka K, Czaplicka M (2022) Correlation between biomass burning tracers in urban and rural particles in Silesia—case study. Water Air Soil Pollut 233:62
Jia Y, Clements AL, Fraser MP (2010) Saccharide composition in atmospheric particulate matter in the southwest US and estimates of source contributions. Aerosol Sci 41:62–73
Jiménez JL, Canagaratna MR, Donahue NM, Prevot ASH, Zhang Q et al (2009) Evolution of organic aerosols in the atmosphere. Science 326:1525–1529
Kang M, Ren L, Ren H, Zhao Y, Kawamura K, Zhang H, Wei L, Sun Y, Wang Z, Fu P (2018) Primary biogenic and anthropogenic sources of organic aerosols in Beijing, China: insights from saccharides and n-alkanes. Environ Pollut 243:1579–1587
Kılavuz SA, Bozkurt Z, Öztürk F (2019) Characterization and source estimates of primary and secondary carbonaceous aerosols at urban and suburban atmospheres of Düzce, Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:6839–6854
Kirchsteiger B, Kistler M, Steinkogler T, Herzig C, Limbeck A, Schmidt C, Rieder H, Kasper-Giebl A (2020) Combination of different approaches to infer local or regional contributions to PM2.5 burdens in Graz. Austria. Appl Sci 10:4222
Křůmal K, Mikuška P, Vojtěšek M, Večeřa Z (2010) Seasonal variations of monosaccharide anhydrides in PM1 and PM2.5 aerosol in urban areas. Atmos Environ 44:5148–5155
Li W, Ge P, Chen M, Tang J, Cao M, Cui Y, Hu K, Nie D (2021) Tracers from biomass burning emissions and identification of biomass burning. Atmosphere 12:1401
Liang L, Engling G, Du Z, Cheng Y, Duan F, Liu X, He K (2016) Seasonal variations and source estimation of saccharides in atmospheric particulate matter in Beijing, China. Chemosphere 150:365–377
Maenhaut W, Vermeylen R, Claeys M, Vercauteren J, Roekens E (2016) Sources of the PM10 aerosol in Flanders, Belgium, and re-assessment of the contribution from wood burning. Atmos Environ 562:550–560
Marynowski L, Simoneit BRT (2022) Saccharides in atmospheric particulate and sedimentary organic matter: status overview and future perspectives. Chemosphere 288:132376
Marynowski L, Łupikasza E, Dąbrowska-Zapart K, Małarzewski Ł, Niedźwiedź T, Simoneit BRT (2020) Seasonal and vertical variability of saccharides and other organic tracers of PM10 in relation to weather conditions in an urban environment of Upper Silesia, Poland. Atmos Environ 242:117489
Megido L, Negral L, Castrillón L, Marañón E, Fernández-Nava Y, Suárez-Peña B (2016) Traffic tracers in a suburban location in northern Spain: relationship between carbonaceous fraction and metals. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:8669–8678
Mendes Emygdio AP, Andrade MF, Teixeira Gonçalves FL, Engling G, de Souza Zanetti RH, Kumar P (2018) Biomarkers as indicators of fungal biomass in the atmosphere of São Paulo, Brazil. Sci Total Environ 612:809–821
Mikuška P, Kubátková N, Křůmal K, Večeřa Z (2017) Seasonal variability of monosaccharide anhydrides, resin acids, methoxyphenols and saccharides in PM2.5 in Brno, the Czech Republic. Atmos Pollut Res 8:576–586
Monteiro A, Gouveia S, Scotto M, Sorte S, Gama C, Gianelle VL, Colombi C, Alves C (2018) Investigating PM10 episodes using levoglucosan as tracer. Air Qual Atmos Health 11:61–68
Nicolás JF, Yubero E, Galindo N, Giménez J, Castañer R, Carratalá A, Crespo J, Pastor C (2009) Characterization of events by aerosol mass size distributions. J Environ Monit 11:394–399
Nicolás JF, Lucarelli F, Galindo N, Yubero E, Crespo J, Calzolai G, Nava S (2020) Impact of traffic flows and meteorological events on the hourly elemental composition of fine and coarse particles at an urban site. Aerosol Air Qual Res 20:991–1001
Nirmalkar J, Batmunkh T, Jung J (2020) An optimized tracer-based approach for estimating organic carbon emissions from biomass burning in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Atmos Chem Phys 20:3231–3247
Oduber F, Calvo AI, Castro A, Alves C, Blanco-Alegre C, Fernández-González D et al (2021) One-year study of airborne sugar compounds: cross-interpretation with other chemical species and meteorological conditions. Atmos Res 251:105417
Perrino C, Tofful L, Dalla Torre S, Sargolini T, Canepari S (2019) Biomass burning contribution to PM10 concentration in Rome (Italy): seasonal, daily and two-hourly variations. Chemosphere 222:839–848
Pikridas M, Vrekoussis M, Sciare J, Kleanthous S, Vasiliadou E, Kizas C, Savvides C, Mihalopoulos (2018) Spatial and temporal (short and long-term) variability of submicron, fine and sub-10 μm particulate matter (PM1, PM2.5, PM10) in Cyprus. Atmos Environ 191:79–93
Pio C, Alves C, Nunes T, Cerqueira M, Lucarelli F, Nava S et al (2020) Source apportionment of PM2.5 and PM10 by Ionic and Mass Balance (IMB) in a traffic-influenced urban atmosphere, in Portugal. Atmos Environ 223:117217
Pio C, CasottiRienda I, Nunes T, Gonçalves C, Tchepel O, Pina NK, Rodrigues J, Lucarelli F, Alves CA (2022) Impact of biomass burning and non-exhaust vehicle emissions on PM10 levels in a mid-size non-industrial western Iberian city. Atmos Environ 289:119293
Rathnayake CM, Metwali M, Baker Z, Jayarathne T, Kostle PA, Thorne PS, O’Shaughnessy PT, Stone EA (2016) Urban enhancement of PM10 bioaerosol tracers relative to background locations in the Midwestern United States. J Geophys Res Atmos 121:5071–5089
Salma I, Némteh Z, Weidinger T, Maenhaut W, Claeys M, Molnár M, Major I, Ajtai T, Utry N, Bozóki Z (2017) Source apportionment of carbonaceous chemical species to fossil fuel combustion, biomass burning and biogenic emissions by a coupled radiocarbon–levoglucosan marker method. Atmos Chem Phys 17:13767–13781
Samaké A, Jaffrezo JL, Favez O, Weber S, Jacob V, Canete T et al (2019a) Arabitol, mannitol, and glucose as tracers of primary biogenic organic aerosol: the influence of environmental factors on ambient air concentrations and spatial distribution over France. Atmos Chem Phys 19:11013–11030
Samaké A, Jaffrezo JL, Favez O, Weber S, Jacob V, Albinet A et al (2019b) Polyols and glucose particulate species as tracers of primary biogenic organic aerosols at 28 French sites. Atmos Chem Phys 19:3357–3374
Samaké A, Bonin A, Jaffrezo JL, Taberlet P, Weber S, Uzu G, Jacob V, Conil S, Martins JMF (2020) High levels of primary biogenic organic aerosols are driven by only a few plant-associated microbial taxa. Atmos Chem Phys 20:5609–5628
Schmidl C, Luiser M, Padouvas E, Lasselsberger L, Rzaca M, Ramírez-Santa Cruz C, Handler M, Peng G, Bauer H, Puxbaum H (2011) Particulate and gaseous emissions from manually and automatically fired small scale combustion systems. Atmos Environ 45:7443–7454
Shahid I, Kistler M, Shahid MZ, Puxbaum H (2019) Aerosol chemical characterization and contribution of biomass burning to particulate matter at a residential site in Islamabad, Pakistan. Aerosol Air Qual Res 19:148–162
Simoneit BRT, Elias VO, Kobayashi M, Kawamura K, Rushdi AI, Medeiros PM, Rogge WF, DiDyk BM (2004) Sugars-dominant water-soluble organic compounds in soils and characterization as tracers in atmospheric particulate matter. Environ Sci Technol 38:5939–5949
Stracquadanio M, Petralia E, Berico M, La Torretta TMG, Malaguti A, Mircea M, Gualtieri M, Ciancarella L (2019) Source apportionment and macro tracer: integration of independent methods for quantification of woody biomass burning contribution to PM10. Aerosol Air Qual Res 19:711–723
Theodosi C, Panagiotopoulos C, Nouara A, Nicolaou P, Violaki K, Kanakidou M, Sempéré R, Mihalopoulos N (2018) Sugars in atmospheric aerosols over the Eastern Mediterranean. Prog Oceanogr 163:70–81
Titos G, Lyamani H, Pandolfi M, Alastuey A, Alados-Arboledas L (2014) Identification of fine (PM1) and coarse (PM10-1) sources of particulate matter in an urban environment. Atmos Environ 89:593–602
Titos G, del Águila A, Cazorla A, Lyamani H, Casquero-Vera JA et al (2017) Spatial and temporal variability of carbonaceous aerosols: assessing the impact of biomass burning in the urban environment. Sci Total Environ 578:613–625
van Drooge BL, Garatachea R, Reche C, Titos G, Alastuey A, Lyamani H, Alados-Arboledas L, Querol X, Grimalt JO (2022) Primary and secondary organic winter aerosols in Mediterranean cities under different mixing layer conditions (Barcelona and Granada). Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:36255–36272
Vicente E, Alves C (2018) An overview of particulate emissions from residential biomass combustion. Atmos Res 199:159–185
Vincenti B, Paris E, Carnevale M, Palma A, Guerriero E, Borello D, Paolini V, Gallucci F (2022) Saccharides as particulate matter tracers of biomass burning: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19:4387
Waked A, Favez O, Alleman LY, Piot C, Petit JE, Delaunay T, Verlinden E, Golly B, Besomes JL, Jaffrezo JL, Leoz-Garziandia E (2014) Source apportionment of PM10 in a north-western Europe regional urban background site (Lens, France) using positive matrix factorization and including primary biogenic emissions. Atmos Chem Phys 14:3325–3346
Xiao M, Wang Q, Qin X, Yu G, Deng C (2018) Composition, sources, and distribution of PM2.5 saccharides in a coastal urban site of China. Atmosphere 9:274
Xu S, Ren L, Lang Y, Hou S, Ren H, Wei L et al (2020) Molecular markers of biomass burning and primary biological aerosols in urban Beijing: size distribution and seasonal variation. Atmos Chem Phys 20:3623–3644
Yttri KE, Dye C, Kiss G (2007) Ambient aerosol concentrations of sugars and sugar-alcohols at four different sites in Norway. Atmos Chem Phys 7:4267–4279
Zangrando R, Barbaro E, Kirchgeorg T, Vecchiato M, Scalabrin E, Radaelli M, Đorđević D, Barbante C, Gambaro A (2016) Five primary sources of organic aerosols in the urban atmosphere of Belgrade (Serbia). Sci Total Environ 571:1441–1453
Zhu RG, Xiao HY, Cheng L, Zhu H, Xiao H, Gong Y (2022) Measurement report: characterization of sugars and amino acids in atmospheric fine particulates and their relationship to local primary sources. Atmos Chem Phys 22:14019–14036
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the ACTRIS-Spain network (CGL2017-90884-REDT), as well as the Elche City Hall for allowing access to their facilities. Á. Clemente thanks the Spanish Ministry of Education for a predoctoral grant (FPU18/00081).
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. This work was supported by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and the “European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR” (CAMBIO project, ref. TED2021-131336B-I00) and by the Valencian Regional Government (Generalitat Valenciana, CIAICO/2021/280 research project).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: E. Yubero and N. Galindo; investigation: Á. Clemente and N. Galindo; funding acquisition: E. Yubero and N. Galindo; project administration: E. Yubero and N. Galindo; visualization: Á. Clemente and J.F. Nicolás; supervision: J. Crespo, E. Yubero, and N. Galindo; writing—original draft: N. Galindo. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for publication
Consent to publish has been received from all participants.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Gerhard Lammel
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Clemente, Á., Yubero, E., Nicolás, J.F. et al. Organic tracers in fine and coarse aerosols at an urban Mediterranean site: contribution of biomass burning and biogenic emissions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 25216–25226 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32789-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32789-x