Abstract
Many vulture species worldwide are declining at alarming rates due to a variety of anthropogenic causes, including exposure to pollutants and pharmaceuticals through consumption of contaminated carrion. However, little is known about the extent to which vultures are exposed to various contaminants as well as toxicity thresholds for trace elements and heavy metals. Our objective was to quantify levels of trace elements and heavy metals within black vulture (Coragyps atratus) and turkey vulture (Cathartes aura) tissues to determine the extent to which populations in the Southeastern United States are exposed to carrion that contains high levels of contaminants. We collected 34 black vulture liver samples and examined differences in trace element and heavy metal concentrations between sexes and age classes (adult and juvenile). Further, we collected 81 blood and 42 feather samples from additional black and turkey vultures and compared differences between species and age classes. We found similar element concentrations between juvenile and adult black vultures with the exception of Cu, where levels were higher in juveniles compared to adults. However, we did observe substantial differences in element concentrations between species for both blood and feather samples, with black vultures generally having higher concentrations of most elements. Our data revealed higher element levels in both species compared to toxicity thresholds found in other bird of prey species, such as blood and liver toxicity threshold suggestions for Pb poisoning in Falconiformes. Further, while average contaminant levels were generally low, extreme outliers were observed for some elements, including Pb, suggesting some individuals were exposed to high levels of potentially toxic elements. More research is needed to better understand contaminant exposure in black and turkey vultures across a broader geographic region, as well as elucidate toxicity thresholds and non-lethal impacts of contaminant exposure in these species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Vultures are a globally distributed taxa consisting of long-lived obligate carrion feeders that occupy high trophic positions within terrestrial food webs (Buckley et al. 2022). As obligate scavengers, vultures rely almost entirely on carrion as a food source. As a result, vultures and other scavengers fill necessary ecological roles within the environment and facilitate nutrient distribution, altered disease dynamics, linkage of food webs, and removal of carrion from the environment (Beasley et al. 2015; DeVault et al. 2016; Kirk and Mossman 2020; Buckley et al. 2022). For example, in the absence of vultures, carrion resides in the landscape longer, allowing time for more mammal scavengers to visit and consume carrion which could increase the transfer of disease between mammals and, subsequently, humans (Ogada et al. 2012b). However, as a group, vultures are currently facing numerous extinction threats, with 72% of vulture species globally experiencing population declines and over half considered endangered or critically endangered (Ogada et al. 2012a; IUCN 2022). The decline in vulture populations is largely due to human activities and the bioaccumulation of anthropogenic contaminants introduced into the environment (Ogada et al. 2012a; DeVault et al. 2016; Plaza and Lambertucci 2019; Ives et al. 2022). Indeed, 95% of reported deaths in threatened or near-threatened vulture species have been linked to dietary toxins (Buechley and Sekercioglu 2016).
Since vultures occupy a high trophic level and feed on carrion, they are especially vulnerable to exposure to heavy metals, trace elements, and other environmental contaminants that can bioaccumulate in their tissues and create health problems such as lead toxicosis and even mortality (Ogada et al. 2012b; Yordy et al. 2013). Further, many vulture species are communal feeders, which can result in multiple individuals being exposed to contaminants from a single contaminated carcass (Buckley 1996; Plaza and Lambertucci 2019). Vultures also have relatively long lifespans, allowing time for toxins to build up to greater levels compared to shorter-lived scavengers (Gangoso et al. 2009). Declines in vulture populations due to bioaccumulation of dietary toxins introduced via carrion can be found worldwide (Ogada et al. 2012b; Ogada et al. 2016). This bioaccumulation can limit individual reproductive success, immune responses, and life span. For example, the drastic decrease in vulture populations in India has been attributed to consumption of livestock treated with veterinary drug diclofenac (Ogada et al. 2012b). Similarly, vulture populations in Africa have declined due to both intentional killings (poachers poisoning leftover kills to avoid the attention generated by circling vultures), unintentional killings (feeding on carcasses poisoned by farmers to kill livestock predators), traditional medicine, and other anthropogenic causes (Ogada et al. 2016).
Within North America, three species of vultures occur (black vulture (Coragyps atratus), turkey vulture (Cathartes aura), and the California condor (Gymnogyps californianus)), all of which experience threats to their populations, such as habitat loss, microtrash consumption, trapping and shooting, aircraft collisions, utility line collisions, wildfire, and exposure to contaminants (such as lead, mercury, and DDT) (Parmalee 1954; Wilbur 1978; Kiff 2000; Blackwell and Wright 2006; Walters et al. 2010; Ogada et al. 2012b; Kelly et al. 2015). In particular, California condors experienced such severe threats and declining populations throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries that by 1987 they were considered extinct in the wild and required human intervention through intensive captive breeding programs in efforts to increase populations (Walters et al. 2010). While all of the aforementioned threats contributed to this occurring, the impact of the introduction of DTT into the landscape and lead poisoning through ingestion of lead fragments was a leading cause in declining populations (Finkelstein et al. 2012; Tubbs 2016). Condor populations have since increased due to intensive recovery efforts and consistent intervention to mitigate lead toxicosis, although exposure to lead and other contaminants remain the primary threat to the recovery of this species (Johnson et al. 2014; Finkelstein et al. 2020). Similarly, although black vultures and turkey vultures are listed as species of least concern on the IUCN Red List and have seen population increases since the late 1900s, contaminant exposure remains a threat and there is little research regarding the current impact of contaminants on either species (IUCN 2022).
Black vultures range throughout the Southeastern United States but recently have expanded their range into the Northeastern and Midwestern United States (Kluever et al. 2020). Turkey vultures share a similar distribution but extend as far west as California and as far north as southern Canada (Kiff 2000). This increase in range coupled with the increasing human population means there is a greater chance for contaminant exposure from anthropogenic sources such as landfills (Novaes and Cintra 2015; Borges-Ramírez et al. 2021). Both vulture species have been able to adapt to the growing human population in the USA and to anthropogenic changes in their environment, roosting closer to roads to forage on roadkill and foraging at landfills (Prior 1990; Holland et al. 2019; Hill et al. 2021). Thus, there is a critical need to quantify vulture exposure to myriad contaminants to better elucidate and mitigate risks to expanding populations.
Although there have been studies exploring the effects of long-term exposure to certain heavy metals such as lead in avian predators (Behmke et al. 2015), there is little information on toxic thresholds for many elements and contaminants of concern for vultures. Further, while exposure to heavy metals and trace elements can ultimately lead to death, it can also lead to less apparent health problems such as bone mineralization, reduced muscle and fat concentrations, organ damage, and internal lesions (Beasley et al. 2015). Heavy metals and trace elements can accumulate in various tissues of birds, and certain elements tend to bioaccumulate within specific organs of the body. For example, elements such as cadmium accumulate mostly in the liver and kidneys, while others, such as lead, mainly accumulate in bones (Scheuhammer 1987). The liver usually contains higher heavy metal concentrations because metals are transported to the liver before other soft tissue such as the kidneys (Ek et al. 2004). However, for species that are protected or not routinely harvested, like vultures, assessments of organ contaminant concentrations may not be feasible, and thus, there is a critical need to quantify relationships between lethally collected samples (e.g., liver, kidney, bones) and non-lethal samples (e.g., blood, feathers) to evaluate the efficacy of non-lethal samples in quantifying contaminant levels.
The objective of this study, therefore, was to quantify levels of a broad suite of trace elements and heavy metals within various tissues of black and turkey vultures to determine the extent to which populations in the Southeastern United States are exposed to contaminants. We compared levels of trace elements and heavy metals between age classes and species for both black and turkey vulture blood and feather samples and age class and sex for black vulture liver tissue samples. We predicted adult black vulture liver samples would have higher levels of trace elements and heavy metals, especially elements that bioaccumulate in the liver such as Cd, Pb, Cr, and Hg, compared to juveniles due to the long-term bioaccumulation within an individual’s soft tissue over their life span (Yordy et al. 2013; Ozaki et al. 2023). We also predicted female black vultures would have higher levels of trace elements and heavy metals compared to males due to their more varied foraging habits throughout their reproductive cycle (Negro et al. 2002; Holland et al. 2017). As black vultures have foraging habits that have the potential to expose multiple individuals to contaminants (such as being communal feeders and foraging at landfills) and often feed on larger carrion (Byrne et al. 2019), we predicted black vultures would have higher levels of trace elements and heavy metals compared to turkey vultures (Coleman and Fraser 1987; Buckley et al. 2022).
Materials and methods
Study area
Blood and feather samples were collected from black and turkey vultures live-captured at the Savannah River Site (SRS), located near Aiken, South Carolina, along the eastern border of Georgia. The SRS is a limited-access nuclear research facility that is owned and maintained by the United States Department of Energy. The SRS is primarily forested but has multiple industrial facilities on the property, such as landfills and decommissioned nuclear reactors. Forested areas within SRS included planted pine forests, upland and bottomland hardwood forests, and wetlands, with abundant populations of numerous mid- to large-sized mammals such as white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), wild pigs (Sus scrofa), raccoons (Procyon lotor), and opossums (Didelphis virginiana) (White and Gaines 2000). Despite having these facilities on site, the majority of the SRS is undisturbed. In addition, liver samples were collected opportunistically from black vultures captured throughout South Carolina and Florida by nuisance control operators.
Sample collection
Blood and feather samples were collected in the summer of 2013 and the spring of 2014 at the Savannah River Site (SRS) following the methods outlined in Holland et al. (2017). Briefly, black and turkey vultures were trapped using a compressed-air-powered cannon net over a carrion bait site. We used wild pig carrion for this study, as wild pigs are removed year-round on the SRS (VerCauteren et al. 2020) and commonly consumed by both black and turkey vultures (Turner et al. 2017). Samples were taken from each bird, and age class (determined by coloration and wrinkling of the head), body condition, location, collection date, and handling time were recorded (Kirk and Mossman 2020; Buckley et al. 2022). We were unable to distinguish between males and females for live-trapped individuals and thus sex was not included in any analyses of blood and feather samples. One to three feathers were taken directly from the breast area and stored in Whirl-Pak® bags (Whirl-Pak®, Madison, WI, USA). Approximately 20 mL of blood was taken in trace-metal-grade heparin tubes to avoid clotting and frozen upon return to the lab. All vulture capture and handling was conducted in accordance with the University of Georgia Animal Care and Use Committee under protocol no. A2013 02-004-Y2-A2, and samples were collected with approval of appropriate state and federal permits. Liver samples were collected in 2020 during necropsies of black vultures euthanized as a part of a nuisance control program in South Carolina and Florida conducted by the United States Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services. No vultures were euthanized specifically for the purposes of this research. We determined the sex of all necropsied vultures.
Sample preparation
Blood samples were weighed and transferred into a metal-grade centrifuge tube and spun down for 5 s. The samples were then placed into a −80 °C freezer until solidified and then freeze-dried. Feather samples were weighed and cleaned with a 5% Citranox dilution and rinsed with Milli-Q® water to clean residue and debris from the feather that would potentially affect contaminant levels (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Feather samples were then freeze-dried, cut into smaller pieces to homogenize the sample, and then weighed again. All the original feather sample was used for analysis. Liver samples were weighed, freeze-dried, ground to homogenize, and then weighed again.
Trace element analysis—blood and feather
Blood and feather samples were analyzed for the following trace elements: vanadium (V), chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), arsenic (As), selenium (Se), strontium (Sr), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), thorium (Th), and uranium (U). To analyze for all elements except Hg, feather and blood samples were placed into a 75–85 °C sand bath for 5 min. Each sample then received 1 mL of HNO3 and 1 mL of 30% hydrogen peroxide while remaining in the sand bath. After 1 h, another 1 mL of HNO3 was added, and the samples were digested for an additional 30 min, or until fully digested (fully liquidized). Once the samples were digested, 3 mL of Milli-Q was added and diluted 1:10 in new tubes; this made the final sample acid concentration 5%. The samples were then analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Nexlon 300x ICP-MS; Perkins Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA). Two blank samples and two certified reference material samples (CRM; TORT-3, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON) were included with each digestion for quality control to calibrate the machine and eliminate any possibility of non-conforming results. Method detection limits (MDLs) for each element were calculated using dry mass weights and are as follows: V = 0.0714 mg/kg, Cr = 0.0755 mg/kg, Mn = 0.1087 mg/kg, Fe = 7.7226 mg/kg, Co = 0.0738 mg/kg, Ni = 0.2207 mg/kg, Cu = 0.2967 mg/kg, Zn = 0.2402 mg/kg, As = 0.0915 mg/kg, Se = 0.7553 mg/kg, Sr = 0.0934 mg/kg, Cd = 0.0725 mg/kg, Th = 2.2146 mg/kg, Pb = 0.0682 mg/kg, and U = 0.0847 mg/kg.
Trace element analysis—liver
We analyzed liver samples for the following trace elements: Hg, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Cd, Pb, and U. To analyze for all elements except Hg, liver samples were microwave digested (MARSX Xpress, CEM, Corporation, Matthews, NC, USA) using 250 mg of the liver sample and 10.0 ml of 70% nitric acid following EPA method 3052 (USEPA 1996). Once the liver sample was digested, it was transferred to a 15-mL tube and 5 mL of Milli-Q water was then added, bringing the volume to 15 mL. The samples were then analyzed at the Savannah River Ecology Laboratory using ICP-MS (Nexlon 300x ICP-MS; Perkins Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA) with a 1:10 dilution factor (1.0 mL sample to 9.0 mL Milli-Q water). MDLs for each element were calculated on a dry mass basis and are as follows: Ni (0.0546 mg/kg), Cu (0.0893 mg/kg), Zn (0.127 mg/kg), Cd (0.0109 mg/kg), Pb (0.0114 mg/kg), U (0.0117 mg/kg), As (0.0489 mg/kg), and Se (1.68 mg/kg). CRM, acid blanks, and sample duplicates were included with each digestion for quality control to eliminate any possibility of non-conforming results (TORT-3, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON). Percent recovery of CRM between 80 and 120% are considered quality and are included in the data set. If samples were not within that range, they were reanalyzed to ensure correct recovery measurements and taken out of the data set if the recovery came back out of range again.
Mercury analysis
Mercury (Hg) was analyzed following the same protocol for all three sample types. We weighed 10–15 mg of each of the freeze-dried sample for direct Hg analysis (DMA-80; Milestone, Shelton, CT, USA) following EPA method 7473 (USEPA 1998). Each sample was subjected to thermal decomposition, catalytic conversion, amalgamation, and atomic absorption spectrophotometry using the direct mercury analyzer. For quality assurance, a duplicate, blank, and two standard reference materials were used within each set of 10 samples (TORT-3 and PACS-2, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON). Duplicates with <20% relative percent difference from each other were considered acceptable. The MDL for Hg for liver samples was 0.155 mg/kg and was calculated as threefold the standard deviation of the procedural blanks. The MDL for blood and feather samples was Hg = 0.6060 mg/kg and was calculated using dry mass weights. Percent recovery of CRM between 80 and 120% is considered quality and samples within this range were included in the analysis. If samples were not within that range, they were reanalyzed to ensure correct recovery measurements and taken out of the dataset if the recovery came back out of range again. Blanks were included to test for contamination in sample processing.
Statistical analysis
The three main datasets (black vulture liver, black and turkey vulture blood, and black and turkey vulture feather) were delineated into six subcategories for comparison: (1) females vs. males (black vulture liver), (2) juveniles vs. adults (black vulture liver), (3) black vultures vs. turkey vultures (blood), (4) juveniles vs. adults (blood), (5) black vultures vs. turkey vultures (feather), and (6) juveniles vs. adults (feather) to determine the average, standard error, minimum, and maximum values for each element. For the black vulture liver data, we evaluated differences in trace element levels between age classes and sexes. No turkey vulture liver samples were available to compare element levels between species. For the blood and feather data, we tested for differences between species and age classes but did not have sufficient data to make comparisons between males and females. Each element was tested for normality using a Shapiro-Wilks test and for homogeneity of variance using a Levene test. Elements that had a non-normal distribution were log-transformed.
Elements in which >50% of the samples were below the MDL were excluded from analysis. If an element had <50% of the samples below the MDL, samples below the MDL were replaced with half of the MDL value for the specific element (Fletcher et al. 2014). We tested for differences in element concentrations between age classes (blood, feather, and liver), sex (liver), and species (blood and feather) using separate multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) models. If MANOVA tests revealed significant differences among the elements (p ≤ 0.05), we then ran pair-wise analysis of variance (ANOVA) models to determine which specific elements were statistically different from each other within each comparison subcategory. Program R was used for all statistical tests using R packages “ggplot2” and “car” (version 4.1.1., R Core Team 2021; Wickham 2016, Fox and Weisberg 2019).
Results
We analyzed 34 black vulture liver samples, 80 blood samples (39 black vultures and 41 turkey vultures), and 42 feather samples (20 black vultures and 22 turkey vultures). For the black vulture liver samples, Ni, U, and As were excluded from statistical analysis as >50% of samples contained levels that fell below the MDL. Similarly, elements Co, Cd, Th, and U were excluded from analyses of blood samples, and Cd, Th, and U were excluded from analyses of feather samples. All reported sample trace element and heavy metal levels are dry weight (dw).
Liver samples
Two black vultures had elevated Pb liver levels that were considered outliers with levels of 2628.10 mg/kg dw and 30.35 mg/kg dw. The average Pb level of the liver samples excluding the two outliers was 1.48 mg/kg dw (±0.32 SE). One individual had considerably higher Hg levels (6.01 mg/kg dw) than other individuals tested. The average Hg level of the liver samples excluding that outlier was 0.59 mg/kg dw (±0.18 SE). All outlier samples were reanalyzed in the lab with a new dilution, which confirmed the high concentrations of those elements. These outliers were subsequently excluded from the MANOVA analyses.
MANOVA tests for black vulture liver samples revealed a significant difference in trace element concentrations between age classes (p = 0.015), with juveniles (n = 5) having higher element levels compared to adults (n = 25). The subsequent pairwise ANOVA for age class revealed only Cu (p = 0.003) differed significantly between adults and juveniles. Juveniles had an average Cu level (mean = 118.95 mg/kg dw ± 52.30 se) that was 311% higher than that of adults (mean = 38.20 mg/kg dw ± 2.54 se) (Table 1). Average Pb was generally higher in adults than juveniles (adult mean = 1.72 mg/kg dw ± 0.39 se, juvenile mean = 0.75 mg/kg dw ± 0.11 se), although this difference was not significant (p = 0.344) (Table 1). Between sexes, there was not a statistical difference in any trace element or heavy metal concentration (MANOVA p = 0.144).
Blood samples
Our MANOVA test for blood samples indicated element levels between black vultures and turkey vultures were significantly different (p < 0.001), with black vultures having higher trace element and heavy metal concentrations on average compared to turkey vultures. The ANOVA for species revealed that Cu, Zn, Pb, Hg, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, As, Ni, and V differed significantly between the two species (Cu p = 0.004, Zn p < 0.001, Pb p = 0.028, Hg: p < 0.001, Cr p = 0.004, Mn p = 0.011, Fe p < 0.001, Co p = 0.020, As p < 0.001, Ni p = 0.004, V p = 0.014). Black vulture blood samples had higher Cu, Pb, Cr, Fe, As, Ni, and V than turkey vulture blood samples (Table 2). Turkey vulture blood samples had higher averages of Zn, Hg, Se, and Mn than black vulture blood samples (Table 2). However, there was no difference in element levels between age classes for either species (black vulture p = 0.126, turkey vulture p = 0.682).
Feather samples
Similar to blood samples, our MANOVA test for feather samples revealed element levels differed between black vultures and turkey vultures (p = 0.004), with black vultures having higher trace element and heavy metal concentrations on average compared to turkey vultures. The ANOVA for species revealed that Cu, Se, Hg, Mn, Fe, Co, As, Sr, and V all were significantly different between the two species (Cu p = 0.011, Se p = <0.001, Hg p = 0.001, Mn p = < 0.001, Fe p = <0.001, Co p = 0.011, As p = 0.020, Sr p = 0.006, V p = <0.001). Black vulture feather samples had higher averages for Cu, Mn, Fe, Co, As, Sr, and V than turkey vulture feather samples (Table 3). Turkey vulture feather samples had higher averages of Se and Hg than black vulture feather samples (Table 3). For both black and turkey vultures, there was no difference in element levels between age classes (black vulture p = 0.459, turkey vulture p = 0.512).
Discussion
Our results revealed black and turkey vultures exhibited differential contaminant burdens in feather and blood samples for several trace elements, with black vultures generally having higher trace element and heavy metal concentrations than turkey vultures. Despite the propensity of some contaminants to bioaccumulate with age, only liver concentrations of Cu differed between juveniles and adults in our study. Although average contaminant levels were generally low for most elements, extreme outliers were observed for some elements, including Pb, suggesting some individuals were exposed to high levels of potentially toxic elements. Collectively, these results suggest black vultures may be more likely to consume food sources that are higher in trace element and heavy metal levels than turkey vultures within some ecosystems where the species co-occur Tables 4, 5, 6.
Despite both species being obligate scavengers, our results demonstrated black vultures and turkey vultures sampled from the same study region differed in element levels in both feather and blood samples, with black vultures on average having higher element levels than turkey vultures, supporting our prediction. Differences in feeding and foraging habits between the two species could account for disparities in feather and blood element levels. Black vultures are communal feeders, have a longer foraging time compared to turkey vultures, and often forage at landfills (Coleman and Fraser 1987; Buckley et al. 2022). Further, black vultures in urban areas often feed at garbage dumps and on livestock whereas turkey vultures are more likely to forage on smaller, wild animals in areas less populated by humans (Prior 1990; Avery and Cummings 2004) and are better able to exploit wild carrion within forested areas (Byrne et al. 2019). Feeding in garbage dumps and other anthropogenic sources could increase exposure to certain elements at higher levels than would normally be introduced in a black vulture’s natural diet. Birds that nest and forage near landfills have elevated levels of metals such as Pb, Hg, Fe, and As, elements that can cause health issues in large quantities (de la Casa-Resino et al. 2014). Feeding on livestock that has been treated with medicine or dietary supplements could also potentially expose black vultures to pharmaceuticals, as was seen with vultures in India feeding on deceased cattle treated with the veterinary medicine dioflenac (Ogada et al. 2012b). Furthermore, black vultures are more social than turkey vultures, and a vulture from a communal roost will often return with other roost members to feed on the same large carcass for multiple days (Rabenold 1987). If the carcass has elevated levels of trace elements and heavy metals, this communal foraging behavior has the potential to impact numerous individuals within a population. A longer foraging time at a single carcass would also increase the consumption of the contaminated carcass, subsequently increasing the accumulation of contaminants by black vultures. Since turkey vultures usually eat smaller, wild carrion and have a shorter length of stay at a carcass than black vultures, turkey vultures may be at less risk of exposure to contaminated carrion (Prior 1990, Avery and Cummings 2004).
Our results demonstrated a difference in trace element concentrations between age classes in black vulture liver samples. However, the only element that was significantly different between adults and juveniles was Cu. This difference was due to high copper levels in two juveniles, both of which were collected from South Carolina. This differed from our expectations, as we predicted adults would have higher element levels as a result of bioaccumulation as the birds aged (Yordy et al. 2013). Due to the large home ranges of vultures (Holland et al. 2017) and the inability to identify specific foraging areas where the individuals might have been exposed to high copper, we are unable to speculate why these particular birds had higher copper levels, although this may be due in part to the small sample size of juveniles (n = 5) compared to adults (n = 25).
Exposure to lead is a concern for many scavenging bird species, such as vultures, condors, and eagles, as these species are at risk of ingesting lead fragments through discarded offal and other un-obtained carcass remains (Stroud and Hunt 2009). Lead poisoning was a main component in the decline of California condors and remains a primary threat to the recovery of this species (Plaza and Lambertucci 2019; Finkelstein et al. 2020). Exposure to lead can cause multiple health problems and ultimately result in mortality if there is no intervention (Krone 2018). Studies suggest that Pb liver levels >6 mg/kg dw indicate abnormally high exposure to Pb (<6 mg/kg dw indicate normal background levels) and Pb liver levels >20 mg/kg dw indicates acute exposure and absorption of lead (Pain et al. 1995). Our results revealed several black vultures with liver lead levels either close to, or higher than, 6 mg/kg dw. However, there are no known lead toxicity thresholds specifically for vulture species and multiple experiments on vultures have revealed lead concentrations at higher blood and liver levels than other birds of prey (Pattee et al. 2006). One study that experimentally dosed turkey vultures with lead found that liver levels of the vultures that died or were euthanized due to lead toxicosis symptoms were higher than that of other Falconiformes (Carpenter et al. 2003). Our blood and feather samples were taken from living vultures which could illustrate black and turkey vulture’s tolerance for elevated lead levels, but health metrics were not available to confirm their overall health and long-term survival. Two black vultures in our study were found to have highly elevated liver lead levels, with concentrations in one individual exceeding 2600 mg/kg dw. This extreme outlier was collected from a Floridian black vulture liver sample of unknown sex. As this vulture was collected from Florida as a part of a nuisance control program, the health of this bird was unknown. Euthanasia methods in Florida included firearms, and thus, this high lead level could be due to a lead fragment from ammunition; the copper level for this individual was also elevated (360.67 mg/kg dw) which could possibly be caused by ammunition. However, the liver itself did not appear to be shot or impacted from a bullet fragment when performing the necropsy and the sample was analyzed twice to confirm element concentrations.
Although we collected blood and feather samples from the same individuals, we limited our analyses to within-sample type comparisons due to differences in contaminant circulation and accumulation between these tissue types. Specifically, feather samples represent contamination levels present while the feather is actively growing and receiving blood and nutrients from the dermal pulp. Once the feather is done growing, the feather will become isolated from the dermal pulp and will no longer receive additional nutrients or blood and thus may not be reflective of blood contaminant concentrations if sampled outside of the brief period of growth (Prum and Williamson 2001). While feathers may not be accurate surrogate samples for predicting blood contaminant levels when not collected during the feather’s growth period, studies have found evidence that feathers are a useful indicator for other contaminants like blood persistent organic pollutants (POP) (Pacyna-Kuchta 2023). Further, utilizing both blood and feather samples in conjunction gives a more complete contaminant exposure history of the individual rather than analyzing either sample type individually. For example, Finkelstein et al. (2010) was able to use estimated feather growth of primary and rectrices feathers to estimate lead exposure events that were not reflected by blood monitoring efforts of California condors. Interestingly, many of the elements evaluated in our study had higher average concentrations in feathers than in blood for both species. This difference could be a reflection of contaminant exposure events prior to the collections of both sample types and could indicate greater exposure than shown by blood samples alone.
There is little to no information on contaminant poisoning in either turkey vultures or black vultures. The few existing contaminant studies focused on turkey vultures and limited elements of interest such as Pb, Cd, and Hg (Carpenter et al. 2003; Di Marzio et al. 2018). These studies have shown that turkey vultures have a much higher threshold for trace element exposure than other vulture and raptor species (Carpenter et al. 2003; Franson and Pain 2011). Cadmium is a heavy metal that can pose health risks at high levels in birds (Scheuhammer 1987). Durkalec et al. (2023) evaluated heavy metals and trace elements in livers from 36 white-tailed eagles (Haliaeetus albicilla) found in Poland and reported mean liver Cd levels of 0.171 mg/kg dw and a range of 0.039–0.470 mg/kg dw. Our black vulture liver samples had a mean of 0.14 kg/mg dw and ranged from 0.04–0.90 mg/kg dw, which is considerably higher than Durkalec et al.’s findings. However, Ozaki et al. (2023) collected liver samples from common buzzards (Buteo buteo) in the UK and reported a mean Cd level of 1.60 mg/kg dw and a range of 0.02–19.46 mg/kg dw. Another study collected turkey vulture liver samples from a landfill in Chile and reported mean Cd levels of 5.24 μg/g dw (SD 8.00, range 0.49 to 19.70 ug/g dw) (Valladares et al. 2012). Although this is a valuable information, it is difficult to find consistent toxicity thresholds in vulture species for most elements, and there are other elements that pose health risks to vultures at high levels, many of which have not been researched in either species (Scheuhammer 1987). Both black and turkey vultures are slowly expanding their range and moving closer to urban areas (Avery 2004) where they are adapting to feed in landfills, potentially increasing their exposure to pollutants within the Southeastern United States (Holland et al. 2019). This will expose vultures to higher levels of anthropogenic contaminants and could lead to potential health effects in vultures. However, element and metal toxicity thresholds in both species are poorly understood (Plaza et al. 2020), and more research must be done to elucidate the element tolerance for a broad suite of anthropogenic contaminants.
Data Availability
Data is available upon reasonable request to the authors.
References
Avery ML (2004) Trends in North American Vulture Populations. USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications, Fort Collins, CO, USA. 75. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/75
Avery ML, Cummings JL (2004) Livestock depredations by black vultures and golden eagles. USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications, Fort Collins, CO, USA. 76. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/76
Beasley JC, Olson ZH, DeVault TL (2015) Ecological role of vertebrate scavengers. In: Benbow EM, Tomberlin J, Tarone A (eds) Carrion ecology, evolution, and their applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp 107–127
Behmke S, Fallon J, Duerr AE, Lehner A, Buchweitz J, Katzner T (2015) Chronic lead exposure is epidemic in obligate scavenger populations in eastern North America. Environ Int 79:51–55
Blackwell B, Wright S (2006) Collisions of red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis), turkey vultures (Cathartes aura), and black vultures (Coragyps atratus) with aircraft: implications for bird strike reduction. J Raptor Res 40:76-80. https://doi.org/10.3356/0892-1016(2006)40[76:CORHBJ]2.0.CO;2
Borges-Ramírez MM, Escalona-Segura G, Huerta-Lwanga E, Iñigo-Elias E, Osten JR (2021) Organochlorine pesticides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, metals and metalloids in microplastics found in regurgitated pellets of black vulture from Campeche, Mexico. Sci Total Environ 801:149674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149674
Buckley NJ (1996) Food finding and the influence of information, local enhancement, and communal roosting on foraging success of North American vultures. Auk 113(2):473–488. https://doi.org/10.2307/4088913
Buckley NJ, Kluever BM, Driver R, Rush SA (2022) Black Vulture (Coragyps atratus), version 2.0. In: Rodewald PG, Keeney BK (eds) Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.blkvul.02
Buechley E, Sekercioglu C (2016) The avian scavenger crisis: looming extinctions, trophic cascades, and loss of critical ecosystem functions. Biol Conserv 198:220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.001
Byrne ME, Holland AE, Turner KL, Bryan AL, Beasley JC (2019) Using multiple data sources to investigate foraging niche partitioning in sympatric obligate avian scavengers. Ecosphere 10:e02548
Carpenter JW, Pattee OH, Fritts SH, Rattner BA, Wiemeyer SN, Royle JA, Smith MR (2003) Experimental lead poisoning in turkey vultures (Cathartes aura). J Wildl Dis 39(1):96–104. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-39.1.96
Coleman JS, Fraser JD (1987) Food habits of black and turkey vultures in Pennsylvania and Maryland. J Wildl Manag 51(4):733–739. https://doi.org/10.2307/3801734
de la Casa-Resino I, Hernández-Moreno D, Castellano A, Perez-Lopez M, Soler F (2014) Breeding near a landfill may influence blood metals (Cd, Pb, Hg, Fe, Zn) and metalloids (Se, As) in white stork (Ciconia 23iconia) nestlings. Ecotoxicology 23:1377–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-014-1280-0
DeVault TL, Beasley JC, Olson ZH, Moleón M, Sánchez-Zapata JA, Carrete M, Margalida A (2016) In: Şekercioğlu CH, Wenny DG, Whelan CJ (eds) Ecosystem services provided by avian scavengers In Why Do Birds Matter? Birds’ Ecological Functions and Ecosystem Services. University of Chicago Press, pp 235–270
Di Marzio A, Gómez-Ramírez P, Barbar F, Lambertucci SA, Garcia-Fernandez AJ, Martinez-Lopez E (2018) Mercury in the feathers of bird scavengers from two areas of Patagonia (Argentina) under the influence of different anthropogenic activities: a preliminary study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:13906–13915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1333-7
Durkalec MM, Nawrocka A, Kitowski I et al (2023) Lead, cadmium, and other trace elements in the liver of golden eagles and white-tailed eagles: recent data from Poland and a systematic review of previous studies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:38566–38581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-25024-y
Ek KH, Rauch S, Morrison GM, Lindberg P (2004) Platinum group elements in raptor eggs, faeces, blood, liver and kidney. Sci Total Environ 334:149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.067
Finkelstein M, George D, Scherbinski S, Gwiazda R, Johnson M, Burnett L, Brandt J, Lawrey S, Pessier A, Clark M, Wynne J, Grantham J, Smith D (2010) Feather lead concentrations and 207Pb/206Pb ratios reveal lead exposure history of California condors (Gymnogyps californianus). Environ Sci Technol 44. https://doi.org/10.1021/es903176w
Finkelstein ME, Doak DF, George D, Burnett J, Brandt J, Church M, Grantham J, Smith DR (2012) Lead poisoning and the deceptive recovery of the critically endangered California condor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(28):11449–11454. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203141109
Finkelstein M, Kuspa Z, Snyder NF, Schmitt NJ (2020) California Condor (Gymnogyps californianus), version 1.0. In: Rodewald PG (ed) Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.calcon.01
Fox J, Weisberg S (2019) An R Companion to Applied Regression, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, Thousand Oaks CA
Fletcher DE, Lindell AH, Stillings GK, Mills GL, Blas SA, McArthur JV (2014) Spatial and taxonomic variation in trace element bioaccumulation in two herbivores from a coal combustion waste contaminated stream. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 101:196–204
Franson JC, Pain DJ (2011) Lead in birds. In: Beyer WN, Meador JP (eds) Environmental contaminants in biota: interpreting tissue concentrations, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 563–593
Gangoso L, Alvarez-Lloret P, Rodríguez-Navarro AA, Mateo R, Hiraldo F, Donázar JA (2009) Long-term effects of lead poisoning on bone mineralization in vultures exposed to ammunition sources. Environ Pollut 157(2):569–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.09.015
Hill JE, Kellner KF, Kluever BM, Avery ML, Humphrey JS, Tillman EA, DeVault TL, Belant JL (2021) Landscape transformations produce favorable roosting conditions for turkey vultures and black vultures. Sci Rep 11:14793. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94045-3
Holland AE, Byrne ME, Bryan AL, DeVault TL, Rhodes OE, Beasley JC (2017) Fine-scale assessment of home ranges and activity patterns for resident black vultures (Coragyps atratus) and turkey vultures (Cathartes aura). PLoS One 12(7):e0179819. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179819
Holland AE, Byrne ME, Hepinstall-Cymerman J, Bryan AL, Dvault TL, Rhodes OE, Beasley JC (2019) Evidence of niche differentiation for two sympatric vulture species in the Southeastern United States. Movement Ecology 7(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-019-0179-z
IUCN (2022) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-1. https://www.iucnredlist.org/. Accessed on 08/03/2022
Ives AM, Brenn-White M, Buckley JY, Kendell CJ, Wilton S, Deem SL (2022) A global review of causes of morbidity and mortality in free-living vultures. EcoHealth 2022:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-021-01573-5
Johnson CK, Kelly TR, Rideout BA (2014) Lead in ammunition: a persistent threat to health and conservation. Ecohealth 10(4):455–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-013-0896-5
Kelly T, Rideout B, Grantham J, Brandt J, Burnett L, Sorenson K et al (2015) Two decades of cumulative impacts to survivorship of endangered California condors in California. Biol Conserv 191:391–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.012
Kiff LF (2000) The current status of North American vultures. In: Chancellor RD, Meyburg BU (eds) Raptors at Risk. Hancock House Publishers, Surrey, BC, Canada, pp 175–189
Kirk DA, Mossman MJ (2020) Turkey Vulture (Cathartes aura), version 1.0. In: Poole AF, Gill FB (eds) Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.turvul.01
Kluever BM, Pfeiffer MB, Barras SC, Dunlap BG, Humberg LA (2020) Black vulture conflict and management in the United States: damage trends, management overview, and research needs. Hum-Wildl Interact 14(3):376–389
Krone O (2018) Lead Poisoning in Birds of Prey. In: Sarasola J, Grande J, Negro J (eds) Birds of Prey. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73745-4_11
Negro JJ, Grande JM, Tella JL, Garrido J, Hornero D, Donázar JA et al (2002) Coprophagy: an unusual source of essential carotenoids—a yellow-faced vulture includes ungulate faeces in its diet for cosmetic purposes. Nature 416:807–808
Novaes WG, Cintra R (2015) Anthropogenic features influencing occurrence of black vultures (Coragyps atratus) and turkey vultures (Cathartes aura) in an urban area in central Amazonian Brazil. Condor 117(4):650–659. https://doi.org/10.1650/CONDOR-15-56.1
Ogada DL, Keesing F, Virani MZ (2012a) Dropping dead: causes and consequences of vulture population declines worldwide. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1249:57–71
Ogada DL, Torchin ME, Kinnaird MF, Ezenwa VO (2012b) Effects of vulture declines on facultative scavengers and potential implications for mammalian disease transmission. Conserv Biol 26:453–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01827.x
Ogada D, Shaw P, Beyers RL, Buij R, Murn C, Thiollay JM, Beale CM, Holdo RM, Pomeroy D, Baker N, Krüger SC, Botha A, Virani MZ, Monadjem A, Sinclair ARE (2016) Another continental vulture crisis: Africa’s vultures collapsing toward extinction. Conserv Lett 9:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12182
Ozaki S, Movalli P, Cincinelli A, Alygizakis N, Badry A, Chaplow JS, Claßen D, Dekker RWRJ, Dodd B, Duke G, Koschorreck J, Pereira MG, Potter E, Slobodnik J, Thacker S, Thomaidis NS, Treu G, Walker L (2023) The importance of in-year seasonal fluctuations for biomonitoring of apex predators: a case study of 14 essential and non-essential elements in the liver of the common buzzard (Buteo buteo) in the United Kingdom. Environ Pollut 323:121308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121308
Pacyna-Kuchta AD (2023) What should we know when choosing feather, blood, egg or preen oil as biological samples for contaminants detection? A non-lethal approach to bird sampling for PCBs, OCPs, PBDEs and PFASs. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 53(5):625–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2022.2077077
Pain DJ, Sears J, Newton I (1995) Lead concentrations in birds of prey in Britain. Environ Pollut 87(2):173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(94)P2604-8
Parmalee PW (1954) The vultures: their movements, economic status, and control in Texas. Auk 71:443–453
Pattee OH, Carpenter JW, Fritts SH, Rattner BA, Wiemeyer SN, Royle JA, Smith MR (2006) Lead poisoning in captive Andean condors (Vultur gryphus). J Wildl Dis 42(4):772–779. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-42.4.772
Plaza P, Lambertucci S (2019) What do we know about lead contamination in wild vultures and condors? A review of decades of research. Sci Total Environ 654:409–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.099
Plaza PI, Wiemeyer G, Lambertucci SA (2020) Comparison of lead contamination among related scavenging birds sharing food sources: a call for caution when using surrogate species. Ibis 162:1303–1311. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12815
Prior KA (1990) Turkey vulture food habits in southern Ontario. Wilson Bull 102(4):706–710
Prum RO, Williamson S (2001) Theory of the growth and evolution of feather shape. J Exp Zool 291(1):30–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.4
R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria https://www.r-project.org/
Rabenold PP (1987) Recruitment to food in black vultures: evidence for following from communal roosts. Anim Behav 35:1775–1785
Scheuhammer AM (1987) The chronic toxicity of aluminium, cadmium, mercury, and lead in birds: a review. Environ Pollut 46(4):263–295
Stroud RK, Hunt WG (2009) Gunshot wounds: a source of lead in the environment. Ingestion of Lead from Spent Ammunition: Implications for Wildlife and Humans. The Peregrine Fund, Boise, Idaho, USA
Tubbs CW (2016) California condors and DDT: examining the effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals in a critically endangered species. Endoc Disrupt 4(1):e1173766. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273747.2016.1173766
Turner KL, Abernethy EF, Conner LM, Rhodes OE Jr, Beasley JC (2017) Abiotic and biotic factors modulate carrion fate and scavenging community dynamics. Ecology 98:2413–2424
United States Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] (1996) Method 3052: Microwave assisted acid digestion of siliceous and organically based matrices, Document 3052–1, Revision 0. Washington DC, USA
United States Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] (1998) Method 7473 (SW-846): Mercury in solids and solutions by thermal decomposition, amalgamation, and atomic absorption spectrophotometry, Revision 0. Washington DC, USA
Valladares P, Alvarado Orellana SR, Carolina Abarca J, Inostroza J, Codoceo J, Ruz M (2012) Cadmium and lead content in liver and kidney tissues of wild turkey vulture Cathartes aura (Linneo, 1758) from Chañaral, Atacama desert, Chile. Gayana (Concepción) 77:97–104. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-65382013000200004
VerCauteren K, Beasley J, Ditchkoff S, Mayer J, Roloff G, Strickland B (2020) Invasive wild pigs in North America: Ecology, impacts, and management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA
Walters J, Derrickson S, Fry DM, Haig S, Marzluff J, Wunderle J Jr (2010) Status of the California condor (Gymnogyps californianus) and efforts to achieve its recovery. Auk 127(4):969–1001. https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2010.127.4.969
White DL, Gaines KF (2000) The Savannah River Site: site description, land use, and management history. Stud Avian Biol 21:8–17
Wickham H (2016) Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA
Wilbur SR (1978) Turkey vulture eggshell thinning in California, Florida and Texas. Wilson Bull 90:642–643
Yordy JE, Rossman S, Ostrom PH, Reiner JL, Bargnesi K, Hughes S, Elliot JD (2013) Levels of chlorinated, brominated, and perfluorinated contaminants in birds of prey spanning multiple trophic levels. J Wildl Dis 49:347–354
Acknowledgements
This work could not have been possible without the support of Z. Smith, R. Kennamer, S. Webster, K. Turner, E. Abernethy, C. Love, C. Rumrill, C. Leaphart, E. J. Borchert, K. Worsley-Tonks, and other volunteers for their assistance in vulture trapping and handling. Thanks also to S. Curry and K. Christ for their assistance in sample collection, as well as A. Boone for her assistance with the project. We also thank A. Lindell for her assistance with sample preparation and the lab analysis of all samples.
Funding
This material is based upon the work supported by the US Department of Energy under Award No. DE-EM0005228 to the UGA Research Foundation, US Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service/Wildlife Services and National Wildlife Research Center, and the US Department of Transportation/Federal Aviation Administration. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This research was conceptualized by JB. Data was collected by AH, AB, JB, and KH. The analysis was performed by KH and CK. KH, CK, and JB contributed to writing the manuscript. All authors contributed to editing and have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All vulture capture and handling was conducted in accordance with the University of Georgia Animal Care and Use Committee under protocol no. A2013 02-004-Y2-A2 and samples were collected with approval of appropriate state and federal permits.
Consent to participate
This research did not involve human participants.
Consent for publication
Upon acceptance, the authors grant permission for this manuscript to be published by Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests to disclose.
Disclaimer
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness. Or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hoynes, K., Holland, A.E., Bryan, A.L. et al. Trace elements and heavy metals in black vultures (Coragyps atratus) and turkey vultures (Cathartes aura) in the southeastern United States. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 9000–9010 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31722-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31722-y