Abstract
In this study, pollens were collected from 25 different locations of Northern Turkey to investigate pollution monitoring. Surface chemistry of pollen samples was characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Then the concentrations of certain elements (Li, Al, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Cd, Ba, and Pb) in pollen samples were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for the evaluation of environmental pollution. The levels of elements were detected in the following ranges (minimum–maximum, mg/kg dry pollen): Li (0.18–0.39), Al (24.98–308.04), V (6.18–98.58), Cr (1.05–6.81), Mn (13.85–95.91), Fe (52.20–326.26), Co (0.15–0.34), Ni (1.66–10.79), Cu (8.61–19.01), Zn (20.47–70.02), As (1.22–2.65), Se (0.39–0.67), Cd (0.05–0.74), Ba (0.73–16.30), and Pb (0.00–0.26). It has been concluded that there is a correlation between the pollen samples with high heavy metal concentrations and traffic density as these regions are closer to the road in the northern region. It is exposed to pollution from various sources such as intensified urbanization and tourism activities carried out on land and sea; industrial activities are increasing rapidly due to the opportunities offered by the coastal areas, sea transportation, and agricultural, domestic, and industrial pollution coming from the inner regions through rivers and streams. In this sense, pollens can be used as potential bio-indicators for monitoring heavy metal pollution and gives an idea about how we can use them for future assessing purposes.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Bee pollen is a mixture of saliva and nectar (or honey) produced by young bees when they land on a flower. They have a unique chemical composition that includes carbohydrates, proteins, and bioactive compounds such as amino acids, lipids, vitamins, carotenoids, and polyphenols. Therefore, honeybee pollens are valuable natural herbal substances with a variety of therapeutic applications for humans, especially in medical and nutritional uses (Ares et al. 2018; Denisow and Denisow-Pietrzyk 2016; Komosinska-Vassev et al. 2015; Margaoan et al. 2019; URCAN et al. 2017). They have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, anticarcinogenic, and antiallergic activities that affect different body functions appropriately (Denisow and Denisow-Pietrzyk 2016; Kieliszek et al. 2018; Komosinska-Vassev et al. 2015; Kostić et al. 2020; Li et al. 2018).
Besides organic compounds, honeybee pollens are rich sources of various minerals (Kieliszek et al. 2018; Kostić et al. 2015; Li et al. 2018). The role of nutritional and physiologically important elements in completing deficiencies is of great importance. However, the inherent elements of bee pollen material enable them to be used not only for nutrition purposes but also for other purposes. The presence of minor and trace elements selected is important in detecting and monitoring environmental pollution (Conti and Botre 2001).
In recent years, there have been studies suggesting that bee products and pollen are important indicators in monitoring environmental pollution by being affected by environmental pollution. Various technological (mining, air and water pollution, various wastes) and natural pollution (originating from mines and soil structure) pass to all these biological products through soil, air, and water. Despite the nutritional value of pollen and its ability to prevent many diseases, it is also known that heavy metals that may be present in them can lead to many types of cancer (Antwi et al. 2015; Matés et al. 2010; Turkdogan et al. 2003). Pollution in water, soil, and air can be measured directly, and these results can provide information about environmental pollution, in this case information about heavy metal to be taken from drinking water or breathing air. However, this information does not give clear information about how much of the pollution affects living things and how much of it is passed on to humans due to biological material. In this case, the composition of pollens is directly affected by the plants as they are exposed to chemicals through air, water, and soil (Altunatmaz et al. 2017). These pollens may include some heavy metals that may come from the air by adsorption. In addition, some of them might comprise these heavy metals in their structure via plants. Pollen, which is used as an important food source in this respect, is considered among the important biomarkers (Aldgini et al. 2019) that can also be considered as a measure of natural and anthropogenic environmental pollution (Dinkov and Stratev 2016). In Turkey, several researchers have investigated some heavy metal levels by ICP-MS analyses in pollen samples and used them as bio-indicators (Altunatmaz et al. 2017; Altunatmaz et al. 2018; Matin et al. 2016; Silici et al. 2016; Temizer et al. 2018). Several works have also shown that bee products can be used as a bio-indicator based on the results of various heavy metals analyzed (Al Naggar et al. 2013; Formicki et al. 2013; Morgano et al. 2012). Hence, it has been revealed that pollens and bee products are important bio-indicators that provide information about environmental pollution.
This article evaluates the results of the presence of elements found in honeybee pollens in Northern Turkey which has specific geographic properties. Geographic properties are important for pollens in terms of both trace metals and minerals. Although trace elements are necessary for humans, toxic metals can also be transported through pollens due to environmental conditions. Therefore, it is important to examine the mineral content of pollens in terms of both human health and indirectly to see the environmental pollution effect (Pohl et al. 2020).
The purpose of this study is to determine the elemental composition of honeybee pollen samples by ICP-MS collected from Northern Turkey including heavy metals and to designate how pollens can be used as biological indicators of environmental pollution. It has also been shown by XPS that functional groups present on the pollen surfaces can be associated with heavy metal sequestration.
Materials and methods
Collection of samples and pre-treatment
Honeybee pollen samples from 25 different locations of Marmara and Black Sea regions of Turkey were obtained. In order to avoid the moisture absorption of honeybee pollen samples, they were kept in glass bottles and stored at − 20 °C. Finally, they were dried at 40 °C in the oven and grounded with the aid of a mortar prior to acid digestion. A minimum of 2 and a maximum of 3 samples were collected from each location. The name and the GPS coordinates of all locations were given in Table 1. The location of all sampling sites were also designated in Fig. 1 using Google Maps according to their GPS coordinates.
Sample preparation for measurements
To decompose the organic matrix of the dried honeybee pollen samples and release the elements into their solutions, the closed-vessel high-pressure microwave-assisted wet digestion (MWD) was applied. After weighing the pollen samples in PFA Teflon vessels, 2.0 mL of HNO3 (nitric acid) and HCl (hydrochloric acid) mixture (5:2 v/v) was added (Adaskeviciute et al.2019; Temizer et al.2018). The pollen samples were left to dissolve using microwave digestion oven (CEM Mars 5 digestion oven) under the conditions of 1600 W and 210 °C for 20 min. After, the vessels were allowed to cool. Finally, the solutions were vortexed, and deionized water was added, totalling its volume to 10 mL prior to ICP-MS analyses. The experiments were performed three times, and relative standard deviations were calculated for each pollen sample.
Method validation
As reported, an appropriate certified reference material (CRM) of the bee pollen matrix is not commercially available (Pohl et al. 2020). For this reason, certified reference material, CRM (BCR®279, sea lettuce Ulva lactuca), was used for the validation of our method due to its complexity as bee pollen matrix. According to the analyses performed (n = 6), the results obtained are consistent with CRM values of the elements present in the sample.
ICP-MS analysis of elements
Once the method has been validated, a total of 25 elements were detected, including mineral and heavy metals (Li, Al, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Cd, Ba, and Pb) on 25 pollen samples using ICP-MS instrument (Bruker 820-MS ICP-MS spectrometer). In ICP-MS analyses, Sc (45), Y (89), and In (115) elements were used as internal standards to compensate the matrix effects. The measurements were repeated 10 times, and the mean values were determined. ICP-MS plasma conditions were given as follows: plasma flow, 16.50 L/min; auxiliary flow, 1.65 L/min; sheath gas flow, 0.20 L/min; nebulizer flow, 0.98L/min; sampling depth, 6.00 mm; and power, 1.40 kW.
XPS analyses of bee pollen samples and data acquisition
The pollen samples were also dried in the oven at 40 °C prior to XPS analyses. After, they were placed into Thermo Scientific K-Alpha XPS instrument sample holder using carbon tape. Subsequently, monochromatic Al Kα X-rays (1486.6 eV) with a diameter of 300 µm were sent to each sample surface. Survey spectra and high-resolution spectra for each sample were acquired with pass energies of 30 eV and 200 eV, respectively, by taking 10 scans to improve the resolution. The pressure in the analysis chamber was 1 × 10−8 mbar. After the analyses (n = 3), data were evaluated using Avantage XPS software (5.9915) package. Peak fitting was performed using Gaussian/Lorentzian peak shapes and a Shirley/Smart type background.
Results
Evaluation of elemental analysis data in bee pollens
In the present study, the concentrations of 15 elements in bee pollen samples were selected and determined since they may reflect the environmental pollution in Northern Turkey. These elements were, namely, Li, Al, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Cd, Ba, and Pb. The results of the analyses were given in Table 2 as mg/kg pollen dry weight.
The minimum and maximum levels of elements were found as followed: Li (0.18 mg/kg) in Ordu Devecik and Ardahan Merkez (0.39 mg/kg); Al in Bayburt Kırkpınar (24.98 mg/kg) and Ardahan Sabaholdu (308.04 mg/kg); V in Yalova Karadere (6.18 mg/kg) and Ordu Perşembe (98.58 mg/kg); Cr in Rize Pekmezli (1.05 mg/kg) and Ordu Perşembe (6.81 mg/kg); Mn in Bayburt Kırkpınar (13.85 mg/kg) and Balıkesir Çamlık (95.91 mg/kg); Fe in Bayburt Kırkpınar (52.20 mg/kg) and Çanakkale Hamidiye (326.26 mg/kg); Co in Bursa İnegazi (0.15 mg/kg) and Balıkesir Çamlık (0.34 mg/kg); Ni in Bayburt Kırkpınar Village (1.66 mg/kg) and Balıkesir Çamlık (10.79 mg/kg); Cu in Bayburt Kırkpınar (8.61 mg/kg) and Çanakkale Hamidiye (19.01 mg/kg); Zn in Bayburt Kırkpınar (20.47 mg/kg) and Çanakkale Hamidiye (70.02 mg/kg); As in Yalova Karadere (1.22 mg/kg) and Ordu Perşembe (2.65 mg/kg); Se in Çorum Oğuzlar (0.39 mg/kg) and Ardahan Center (0.67 mg/kg); Cd in Yalova Gelincik (0.05 mg/kg) and Balıkesir Aygören (0.67 mg/kg); Ba in Ordu Perşembe (0.73 mg/kg) and Balıkesir Aygören (16.30 mg/kg); and Pb in many locations (< 0.005 mg/kg) and Ardahan Sevimli (0.26 mg/kg). According to these results, it might be deduced that bee pollen samples in Ordu Perşembe were highly contaminated with V, Cr, As, Se, and Ba. It had also high levels of Al, Mn, Ni, Cu, and Zn, whereas it was very contaminated with Cd and Pb. On the other hand, Bayburt Kırkpınar had the lowest pollution levels relatively when these elements were considered. Among the analyzed bee pollen samples, the content of Se, Cd, and Pb levels was found to be low in all of the locations where concentrations of As were also relatively high.
Microwave digestion procedure for CRM was performed to validate the method based on accuracy and precision. To improve the validation study, an in-house secondary reference standard solution at the concentration of 10 mg/L was produced by using the multi-element calibration solution (Merck 1.11355-ICP multi-element standard solution IV for ICP-MS). As described by previous studies (Arica et al. 2018; Horwitz 1982), precision was calculated in terms of coefficient of variation, whereas accuracy was expressed by relative error. The results of the validation study were given in Table 3, and it demonstrates that the method is accurate and precise.
Elemental composition bee pollen surface by XPS
Survey and partial screening of the elements on the pollen surface were performed by XPS, and information about the functional groups on the pollen surface was acquired. The survey spectra for the pollen samples were given in Fig. 2. Elemental characterization of pollens with % values by mass was also obtained quantitatively. In order to get information about the surface chemistry of the pollens and the functional groups present on the surface, C 1 s spectra of bee pollens were provided in supplementary part (Fig. S1).
As seen in Table 4, most pollen samples consist of C and O elements. In some examples, N element was also found, meaning that each pollen sample surface has different compositions.
Discussion
Bee pollens as bio-indication of environmental pollution
When the results obtained from many studies conducted in different countries are examined, the max and min values related to the elements are as follows, respectively: Al, 0.10–836 (mg/kg); Co, 0.01–1.2 (mg/kg); Fe, 6.6–1180 (mg/kg); Zn, 5.1–162 (mg/kg); Ni, 0.001–6.85 (mg/kg); Mn, 5.1–429.8 (mg/kg); Cu, 0.11–27.7 (mg/kg); Cr, 0.002–42 (mg/kg); Pb, 0.001–14.20 (mg/kg); As, 0.007–14.710 (mg/kg); Ba, 0.032–17.63 (mg/kg); V, 0.04–3.94 (mg/kg); Li, 0.02–2.35 (mg/kg); Cd, 0.001–15.40 (mg/kg); and Se, 0.01–5.48 (mg/kg) (Pohl et al. 2020; Sattler et al. 2016).
When reviewing the results obtained from studies conducted in Turkey, some elements belonging to the max and min values are as follows: Al, 1.20–108.5 (mg/kg); Co, 0.00 (mg/kg); Fe, 28.6–725 (mg/kg); Zn, 10.3–162 (mg/kg); Ni, 0.002–2.56 (mg/kg); Mn, 8.2–201.0 (mg/kg); Cu, 2.7–15.00 (mg/kg); Cr, 0.13–7.94 (mg/kg); Pb, 0.25–0.67 (mg/kg); As, 0.006–8.51 (mg/kg); Ba, not analyzed; V, 0.84–3.94 (mg/kg); Li, not analyzed; Cd, 0.007–0.297 (mg/kg); and Se, 0.42–19.88 (mg/kg) (Altunatmaz et al. 2017; ALTUNATMAZ et al. 2018; Kalaycıoğlu et al. 2017; Matin et al. 2016; Silici et al. 2016; Temizer et al. 2018).
When the results are examined, Ni and V levels are particularly striking. It has been observed that these two elements are higher than their maximum values found in studies in the literature. Another point to be emphasized is that there are few studies on vanadium. According to Sattler et al. (2016), vanadium was detected in bee pollen for the first time in their own studies. In another study conducted in Turkey, maximum V concentration was reported to be 3.94 mg/kg. In this study, vanadium levels were found to be quite high. While the maximum value was 98.58 mg/kg, the average value was determined as 23.51 mg/kg. According to the reports of the State Planning Organization (DPT), there are no primary reserves or production of vanadium in Turkey. This does not mean that there is no source of vanadium in Turkey. Although there are no primary vanadium reserves established in Turkey, there may be a high level of secondary sources. There are various studies on Turkish coals and coal ashes for the determination of trace element contents. Among these, high levels of V, Co, and Ni were found when coal was burned. The ashes of these coal beds can be considered as a potential resource. As reported by DPT, asphaltite is one of many well-known vanadium resources in Turkey. Asphaltite coals are the most important resources, but not only for vanadium, but also for molybdenum and nickel. When coal is burned and turned into ash, the V2O5 content reaches to above 1%. It is clear that coal ash obtained from asphaltites is a serious source of vanadium and that sustainable vanadium production can be achieved from this source. In summary, the thermal power plant ash, bauxite processing wastes, and residues of petroleum or petroleum products may be potential vanadium resources in Turkey (UYSAL 2020). This indicates that the V source is of anthropogenic origin.
Cobalt analysis conducted by researchers in Turkey and Co was not detected in any samples of bee pollen (Temizer et al. 2018). In this study, Co values in bee pollens were found to be higher compared to other studies (Adaskeviciute et al. 2019; Kostić et al. 2015). It is known that most of the cobalt element is formed as a by-product of nickel refining (Pazik et al. 2016).
To the best of our knowledge, barium and lithium in bee pollen were not analyzed before in Turkey. The maximum levels of barium determined were close to the highest values in the world where the lithium values are relatively low (Pohl et al. 2020).
In this study, the results obtained for Cr, Cu, Mn, Zn Ni, Cd, and As are higher than the results found by Altunatmaz et al. (2017) on average. In another study conducted by Altunatmaz et al. (2018), 9 common elements were studied, and the average results were higher for the elements Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cd, and Al except Se and Pb. When compared with a study performed by Kalaycıoğlu et al. (2017), the average Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, Al, Ni, and V values found in the presents study are quite high. In addition, Temizer et al. (2018) collected bee pollen from similar regions of the Black Sea and investigated the concentrations of Al, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, As, and Pb elements. The average values we found for all elements are higher except Pb and As. Most of the results were higher when compared with the studies conducted in Turkey. This may also be related to the collection time. Al Naggar et al. (2013) reported that the collection time of bee pollen results in differences of up to 10 times in terms of metal content. Bee pollen collected in this study was typically exposed to air, water, and soil contamination from vehicle emissions, industrial emissions, dust spills, atmospheric deposits, wastes, or volcano activities. For rural areas and areas with high agricultural production, bee pollen contamination with selected elements might be often associated with natural fertilization and pests (Al Naggar et al. 2013; Aldgini et al. 2019; Altunatmaz et al. 2017; Formicki et al. 2013; Roman 2009; Sattler et al. 2016; Siqueira et al. 2017; Temizer et al. 2018). Especially, the northwestern regions have more industrial activity, and the higher population in these cities increased the pollution levels. On the other hand, the northeastern part of Turkey had a higher rural population which led to agricultural activities. As shown by several researchers, bee pollen has been highly susceptible to contamination from anthropogenic activities and can therefore serve as a highly sensitive biomarker of environmental pollution (Aldgini et al. 2019; Álvarez-Ayuso and Abad-Valle 2017; Conti and Botre 2001; Dima et al. 2012; Dinkov and Stratev 2016; Golubkina et al. 2016; Mejías and Montenegro 2012; Mejías et al. 2018; Morgano et al. 2010; Nascimento et al. 2018; Popescu et al. 2010; Roman 2009; Roman et al. 2016). Therefore, differences in concentration levels of elements found in bee pollen samples from different areas are related to their geochemistry, mineralogy, and population. They also reveal the complex relationships between urbanization, industrialization, and other anthropogenic activities that occur in these areas (Nascimento et al. 2018).
Surface chemistry of bee pollens and binding profiles
In the present study, surface chemistry of bee pollen samples was investigated by XPS. The XPS survey spectra of each pollen sample were demonstrated in Fig. 2 which indicates that pollen samples mainly consist of C, O, and sometimes N. High-resolution XPS spectra for the carbon element of pollen samples are given in Fig. S1. Accordingly, photoelectron peaks of carbon (C 1 s) at ~ 285 eV, nitrogen (N ls) at ~ 399 eV, and oxygen (O 1 s) at ~ 532 eV were found. While most pollen samples have C and O peaks, some pollen samples have N peaks (Rumble Jr et al. 1992). Based on the high-resolution C 1 s, N 1 s, and O 1 s spectra, the presence of functional groups in the pollen can be determined. When the C 1 s peaks of the pollen samples are examined, four different carbon bonds usually attract attention.
According to the partial spectra results of XPS from pollen samples, C peaks for all samples present four types of carbon bonding, each indicating a different functional group. The major carbon peak at ~ 285.0 eV represents C–C and/or C-H bond; ~ 286.5 eV indicates the presence of C–O–C and /or C–OH bond; ~ 287.9 eV shows O-C-O and/or C = O (carbonyl group) bond; and ~ 289.0 eV gives idea about O = C-O (carboxyl group) bonds. When oxygen peaks are examined, photoelectron peaks of 533.6 eV support the presence of carboxyl (C = O) groups, and peaks at 532.9 eV also show aliphatic C-O bonds from esters and alcohols. The presence of nitrogen peaks indicates that primary and secondary amine bonds are present in those pollens (C-N) (Bubert et al. 2002; Tan et al. 2018; Tang et al. 2016). When all the partial spectra of pollen samples were examined, it was seen that the related elements gave peaks close to their binding energy.
In all of the samples, based on the peak intensities, it can be said that the amount of each functional group explained here might change due to the structure of each pollen sample.
The XPS technique gives only information about surface chemistry of pollens as in all other samples. It does not require full composition of pollens. In the present study, XPS technique was used to give an idea about the functional groups present on the pollen surfaces on which the heavy metals were adsorbed. The functional groups on the surface of bee pollens are considered to be responsible for the adsorption of heavy metal pollution from air and/or pesticides. The metals in the environment are easily attached primarily to the functional groups on these pollen surfaces. This might be the major reasons that pollen samples have high metal uptake capacity.
Conclusion
This work emphasizes that the bee pollen is a candidate environmental specimen that can effectively be employed as a novel bio-indicator for monitoring ecological pollution. Involving XPS analyses, the study revealed the chemistry of surface functional groups having a high capacity of absorbing heavy metals. Herewith, a multi-element detection with ICP-MS has been performed to screen bee pollen samples since excess essential metals and even low levels of heavy metals are toxic to children, pregnant women, and older people. The use of this promising method in related samples will help future environmental studies.
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Adaskeviciute V, Kaskoniene V, Kaskonas P, Barcauskaite K, Maruska A (2019) Comparison of physicochemical properties of bee pollen with other bee products. Biomolecules 9:819. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9120819
Al Naggar YA, Naiem E-SA, Seif AI, Mona MH (2013) Honey bees and their products as a bioindicator of environmental pollution with heavy metals. Mellifera 13:1–20
Aldgini HMM, Abdullah Al-Abbadi A, Abu-Nameh ESM, Alghazeer RO (2019) Determination of metals as bio indicators in some selected bee pollen samples from Jordan. Saudi J Biol Sci 26:1418–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.03.005
Altunatmaz SS, Tarhan D, Aksu F, Barutcu UB, Or ME (2017) Mineral element and heavy metal (cadmium, lead and arsenic) levels of bee pollen in Turkey. Food Science and Technology 37:136–141. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457x.36016
Altunatmaz SS, Tarhan D, Aksu F, Ozsobaci NP, Or ME, Barutcu UB (2018) Levels of chromium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, selenium, zinc, cadmium, lead and aluminium of honey varieties produced in Turkey. Food Sci Technol 39:392–397. https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.19718
Álvarez-Ayuso E, Abad-Valle P (2017) Trace element levels in an area impacted by old mining operations and their relationship with beehive products. Sci Total Environ 599:671–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.030
Antwi SO, Eckert EC, Sabaque CV, Leof ER, Hawthorne KM, Bamlet WR, Chaffee KG, Oberg AL, Petersen GM (2015) Exposure to environmental chemicals and heavy metals, and risk of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Causes Control 26:1583–1591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0652-y
Ares AM, Valverde S, Bernal JL, Nozal MJ, Bernal J (2018) Extraction and determination of bioactive compounds from bee pollen. J Pharm Biomed Anal 147:110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2017.08.009
Arica E, Yuksel B, Yener I, Dolak I, Gok E, Yilmaz E (2018) ICP-MS determination of lead levels in autopsy liver samples: an application in forensic medicine. At Spectrosc 39:62–66
Bubert H, Lambert J, Steuernagel S, Ahlers F, Wiermann R (2002) Continuous decomposition of sporopollenin from pollen of Typha angustifolia L. by acidic methanolysis. Z Naturforsch C J Biosci 57:1035–1041. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2002-11-1214
Conti ME, Botre F (2001) Honeybees and their products as potential bioindicators of heavy metals contamination. Environ Monit Assess 69:267–282. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010719107006
Denisow B, Denisow-Pietrzyk M (2016) Biological and therapeutic properties of bee pollen: a review. J Sci Food Agric 96:4303–4309. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7729
Dima G, Popescu IV, Dinu S, Nitescu O, Stirbescu R (2012) Heavy metals in pollen samples collected from the Dambovita County analysed by Edxrf method. Rom J Phys 57:1411–1416
Dinkov D, Stratev D (2016) The content of two toxic heavy metals in Bulgarian bee pollen. Int Food Res J 23:1343–1345
Formicki G, Gren A, Stawarz R, Zysk B, Gal A (2013) Metal content in honey, propolis, wax, and bee pollen and implications for metal pollution monitoring. Pol J Environ Stud 22:99–106
Golubkina NA, Sheshnitsan SS, Kapitalchuk MV, Erdenotsogt E (2016) Variations of chemical element composition of bee and beekeeping products in different taxons of the biosphere. Ecol Ind 66:452–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.042
Horwitz W (1982) Evaluation of analytical methods used for regulation of foods and drugs. Anal Chem 54:67–76
Kalaycıoğlu Z, Kaygusuz H, Döker S, Kolaylı S, Erim FB (2017) Characterization of Turkish honeybee pollens by principal component analysis based on their individual organic acids, sugars, minerals, and antioxidant activities. LWT 84:402–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.06.003
Kieliszek M, Piwowarek K, Kot AM, Błażejak S, Chlebowska-Śmigiel A, Wolska I (2018) Pollen and bee bread as new health-oriented products: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 71:170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.10.021
Komosinska-Vassev K, Olczyk P, Kazmierczak J, Mencner L, Olczyk K (2015) Bee pollen: chemical composition and therapeutic application. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015:297425. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/297425
Kostić AŽ, Pešić MB, Mosić MD, Dojčinović BP, Natić MM, Trifković JĐ (2015) Mineral content of bee pollen from Serbia/Sadržaj minerala u uzorcima pčelinjega peluda iz Srbije. Arch Ind Hyg Toxicol 66:251–258. https://doi.org/10.1515/aiht-2015-66-2630
Kostić AŽ, Milinčić DD, Barać MB, Ali Shariati M, Tešić ŽL, Pešić MB (2020) The application of pollen as a functional food and feed ingredient—the present and perspectives. Biomolecules 10:84. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10010084
Li Q-Q, Wang K, Marcucci MC, Sawaya ACHF, Hu L, Xue X-F, Wu L-M, Hu F-L (2018) Nutrient-rich bee pollen: a treasure trove of active natural metabolites. Journal of Functional Foods 49:472–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2018.09.008
Margaoan R, Strant M, Varadi A, Topal E, Yucel B, Cornea-Cipcigan M, Campos MG, Vodnar DC (2019) Bee collected pollen and bee bread: bioactive constituents and health benefits. Antioxidants (basel) 8:568. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8120568
Matés JM, Segura JA, Alonso FJ, Márquez J (2010) Roles of dioxins and heavy metals in cancer and neurological diseases using ROS-mediated mechanisms. Free Radical Biol Med 49:1328–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.07.028Get
Matin G, Kargar N, Buyukisik HB (2016) Bio-monitoring of cadmium, lead, arsenic and mercury in industrial districts of Izmir, Turkey by using honey bees, propolis and pine tree leaves. Ecol Eng 90:331–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.035
Mejías E, Montenegro G (2012) The antioxidant activity of Chilean honey and bee pollen produced in the Laima volcano’s zones. J Food Qual 35:315–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4557.2012.00460.x
Mejías EG, Gomez C, Gareil P, Delaunay N, Montenegro G (2018) Characterization of phenolic profile alterations in metal-polluted bee pollen via capillary electrophoresis. Int J Agricult Natural Res 45:51–63. https://doi.org/10.7764/rcia.v45i1.1890
Morgano MA, Teixeira Martins MC, Rabonato LC, Milani RF, Yotsuyanagi K, Rodriguez-Amaya DB (2010) Inorganic contaminants in bee pollen from southeastern Brazil. J Agric Food Chem 58:6876–6883. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf100433p
Morgano MA, Martins MCT, Rabonato LC, Milani RF, Yotsuyanagi K, Rodriguez-Amaya DB (2012) A comprehensive investigation of the mineral composition of brazilian bee pollen: geographic and seasonal variations and contribution to human diet. J Braz Chem Soc 23:727–736. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532012000400019
Nascimento NO, Nalini HA, Ataide F, Abreu AT, Antonini Y (2018) Pollen storage by stingless bees as an environmental marker for metal contamination: spatial and temporal distribution of metal elements. Sociobiology 65:252–263. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v65i2.2078
Pazik PM, Chmielewski T, Glass HJ, Kowalczuk PB (2016) World production and possible recovery of cobalt from the Kupferschiefer stratiform copper ore, E3S web of conferences. EDP Sci 8:01063. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160801063
Pohl P, Dzimitrowicz A, Greda K, Jamroz P, Lesniewicz A, Szymczycha-Madeja A, Welna M (2020) Element analysis of bee-collected pollen and bee bread by atomic and mass spectrometry - methodological development in addition to environmental and nutritional aspects. Trac-Trends Anal Chem 128:115922
Popescu IV, Dima G, Dinu S (2010) The content of heavy metals in pollen from Dambovita region. J Sci Arts 10:171
Roman A (2009) Concentration of chosen trace elements of toxic properties in bee pollen loads. Pol J Environ Stud 18:265–272
Roman A, Popiela-Pleban E, Migdal P, Kruszynski W (2016) As, Cr, Cd, and Pb in Bee products from a Polish industrialized region. Open Chem 14:33–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2016-0007
Rumble J Jr, Bickham D, Powell C (1992) The NIST x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy database. Surf Interface Anal 19:241–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.740190147
Sattler JAG, De-Melo AAM, do Nascimento KS, de Melo ILP, Mancini J, Sattler A, de Almeida-Muradian LB (2016) Essential minerals and inorganic contaminants (barium, cadmium, lithium, lead and vanadium) in dried bee pollen produced in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Food Sci Technol 36:505–509. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457x.0029
Silici S, Uluozlu OD, Tuzen M, Soylak M (2016) Honeybees and honey as monitors for heavy metal contamination near thermal power plants in Mugla, Turkey. Toxicol Ind Health 32:507–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233713503393
Siqueira JS, Pereira JB, Lemos MS, Dantas HA, Dantas KGF (2017) Optimization of a digestion method using diluted acid in bee pollen samples for determination of Fe, Mn, and Zn by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Food Anal Meth 10:759–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-016-0625-0
Tan EL, Potroz MG, Ferracci G, Jackman JA, Jung H, Wang LL, Cho NJ (2018) Light-induced surface modification of natural plant microparticles: toward colloidal science and cellular adhesion applications. Adv Func Mater 28:1707568. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201707568
Tang J, Etacheri V, Pol VG (2016) From allergens to battery anodes: nature-inspired, pollen derived carbon architectures for room-and elevated-temperature Li-ion storage. Sci Rep 6:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32276
Temizer IK, Guder A, Temel FA, Avci E (2018) A comparison of the antioxidant activities and biomonitoring of heavy metals by pollen in the urban environments. Environ Monit Assess 190:462. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32276
Turkdogan MK, Kilicel F, Kara K, Tuncer I, Uygan I (2003) Heavy metals in soil, vegetables and fruits in the endemic upper gastrointestinal cancer region of Turkey. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 13:175–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1382-6689(02)00156-4
Urcan A, Mărghitaş LA, Dezmirean DS, Bobiş O, Bonta V, Mureşan CI, Mărgăoan R (2017) Chemical composition and biological activities of beebread-review. Bulletin of the University of Agricultural Sciences & Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Animal Sci Biotechnol 74:1–6. https://doi.org/10.15835/buasvmcn-asb:12646
UYSAL S (2020) Coal ashes as a vanadium resource and its potential in Turkey, Dokuz Eylul University
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Apiculture Research Institute for supporting the honeybee pollen samples. Moreover, the authors would like to acknowledge Giresun University Central Research Laboratory (GRÜMLAB) for the inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and microwave digestion facilities and Ege University Application and Research Center for Testing and Analysis (EGE MATAL) for the XPS analyses.
Funding
The authors declare that this study was supported by the Scientific Research Projects Department with a project number of FEN-BAP-A-160317–34, Giresun University.
Giresun University,FEN-BAP-A-160317–34,Mehmet Emin ŞEKER
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiment: MEŞ, AE, SDK, and ÖK.
Performed the experiment: MEŞ and AE.
Analyzed the data: MEŞ and AE.
Contributed materials/analysis: MEŞ, AE, SDK, and ÖK.
Wrote the article: MEŞ and AE.
Revised the manuscript: MEŞ, AE, SDK, and ÖK.
Approved the manuscript: All authors approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Consent to participate
All authors declare that they participated in the study and in the development of this manuscript.
Consent for publication
All the authors have read the final version of manuscript and gave their consent for this publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Şeker, M., Erdoğan, A., Korkmaz, S. et al. Bee pollens as biological indicators: An ecological assessment of pollution in Northern Turkey via ICP-MS and XPS analyses. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 36161–36169 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18007-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18007-y