Abstract
Contamination of feed by mycotoxins is a global epidemic that has a sizeable impact on animal health and causes economic losses. Mycotoxins, including aflatoxins (AFs), zearalenone (ZEN), fumonisins (FUMs), deoxynivalenol (DON), and ochratoxin A (OTA), lead to acute and chronic adverse effects in pigs. Animal feed and feed ingredients are commonly contaminated by one or more mycotoxins worldwide; however, the prevalence of mycotoxin contamination in feed and feed ingredients in Taiwan remains unclear. A total of 820 cornmeal and corn-based swine feed (pregnancy and nursery diets) samples provided by feed and animal producers were analyzed using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method between January 2015 and December 2017 to determine the presence of mycotoxins. The results revealed that the most prevalent mycotoxin in Taiwan was DON, with 91.4% of positive samples between 2015 and 2017, followed by ZEN, AFs, and FUMs, with 70.2%, 58.0%, and 50.4% of positive samples, respectively. A similar prevalence of mycotoxins was observed in cornmeal and corn-based swine feed. Furthermore, 7.7% of the analyzed feed samples contained one mycotoxin, and 91.3% contained multiple mycotoxins. DON was the most prevalent mycotoxin in cornmeal and corn-based swine feed in Taiwan. Moreover, a high incidence of contamination by multiple mycotoxins was observed in swine feed. Awareness of mycotoxin presence in feed and development of mycotoxin detoxification strategies are unmet needs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Mycotoxins, including aflatoxins (AFs), zearalenone (ZEN), fumonisins (FUMs), deoxynivalenol (DON), and ochratoxin A (OTA), are secondary metabolites of fungi that have adverse effects on humans and animals (Hussein and Brasel 2001). Contamination of food and animal feed with mycotoxins is a global epidemic that has a sizeable impact on health and causes economic losses (Wu 2007; Bryden 2012). Mycotoxins exert various acute and chronic effects on farm animals depending on species and susceptibility (Zain 2011). Deleterious effects of mycotoxins on animals include chronic growth impairment and acute mortality (Grenier and Applegate 2013). In addition, cocontamination of mycotoxins in feed has severe effects on animals because of additive and synergistic interactions between mycotoxins (Speijers and Speijers 2004).
Mycotoxins are prevalent in grains such as corn, soybean, wheat, and barley and their byproducts (Rodrigues and Naehrer 2012a; Rodrigues and Naehrer 2012b; Pinotti et al. 2016; Abudabos et al. 2017). Moisture and temperature are critical factors for mold growth and mycotoxin production (Bryden 2012). In addition, the prevalence of mycotoxins in feed and feed ingredients may vary by location and season (Rodrigues and Naehrer 2012a; Rodrigues and Naehrer 2012b; Pinotti et al. 2016).
Taiwan belongs to both tropical and subtropical climate zones and has hot and rainy seasons. More specifically, the weather in Taiwan is hot with high humidity in summer. Therefore, mold thrives on surfaces holding animal feed because of abundant moisture in the highly humid environment. A survey conducted in North Asia between January 2009 and December 2010 analyzed feed samples for the presence of AFs, DON, ZEN, FUMs, and OTA (Rodrigues and Naehrer 2012a). The results revealed that the most prevalent of these mycotoxins in the region were DON, ZEN, and FUMs (Rodrigues and Naehrer 2012a). DON was present in 70% of the tested samples with an average of 691 ppb (Rodrigues and Naehrer 2012a). However, awareness of the prevalence of mycotoxins remains limited and comprehensive surveys are rare in Taiwan. Only the prevalence of FUMs in corn and animal feed has been analyzed (Tseng and Liu 1999, 2001; Cheng et al. 2002). Contamination of feed with mycotoxins is expected to become more prevalent because of global warming and the increase in extreme weather events. Changes in environmental stress also have a considerable impact on mycotoxin production in mold (Magan et al. 2011). Thus, annual surveying of mycotoxins in feed is crucial for enabling feed and animal producers to assess the risk of and prevent mycotoxin contamination of feed.
This study surveyed the prevalence of mycotoxins in cornmeal and corn-based swine feed (pregnancy and nursery diets) in Taiwan over a 3-year period. In total, 820 samples were analyzed for mycotoxin presence between January 2015 and December 2017.
Materials and methods
Sample collection and preparation
A total of 820 feed samples were provided by various feed and animal producers in Taiwan between 2015 and 2017. Criteria for sampling and sample preparation for mycotoxin analysis described in previous studies were strictly followed (Richard 2006; Whitaker 2006). Corn-based swine feed (pregnancy and nursery diets) and cornmeal (mainly imported from the USA and Brazil) samples were completely ground by using commercial blenders (Waring Products, Torrington, CT, USA). Homogenized feed subsamples of 20 g were weighed and mixed with 100 mL of 70% methanol at 25 °C for 3 min for AF, ZEN, and FUM extraction. For DON extraction, 20 g of homogenized feed samples were mixed with 100 mL of distilled water at 25 °C for 3 min. After extraction, the extracts were filtered using a Whatman No. 1 filter. The filtrates could be used for AF measurement directly without dilution. For ZEN and FUM quantification, filtrates were diluted 1:4 with 70% methanol and 1:19 with distilled water, respectively. For DON quantification, filtrates were diluted 1:4 with distilled water.
Mycotoxin analysis
The filtrates and diluted filtrates were tested for mycotoxin content by using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. AFs, including AFs B1, B2, G1, and G2, were examined using AgraQuant Total Aflatoxin Assay 1/20 (Romer Labs, Newark, DE, USA). FUMs, including FUMs B1, B2, and B3, were examined using AgraQuant Total Fumonisin Assay 0.25/5.0 (Romer Labs, Newark, DE, USA). AgraQuant Zearalenone Plus Assay 25/1000 and AgraQuant Deoxynivalenol Assay 0.25/5.0 were used for ZEN and DON examination, respectively. ELISA was performed in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, and signals were measured using a microplate reader with absorbance of 450 nm filter and a differential filter of 630 nm (SH-1000Lab, Corona, Japan). The concentration of each mycotoxin was determined on the basis of the slope of the standard curve. The method’s limits of detection for AFs, ZEN, FUMs, and DON were 1, 20, 200, and 200 ppb, respectively, and their ranges of quantification were 1–20, 25–1000, 250–5000, and 250–5000 ppb, respectively. On the basis of the feed and animal producers’ choices, the number of tests for mycotoxins may have varied each year.
Results
The results revealed that 91.4% of the feed samples were contaminated by DON between 2015 and 2017 (Table 1). The second most prevalent mycotoxin was ZEN with 70.2% of positive samples between 2015 and 2017, followed by AFs and FUMs with 58.0% and 50.4%, respectively (Table 1). The average concentrations of mycotoxins in all tested feed samples were 1.2, 51.9, 592.9, and 782.6 ppb for AFs, ZEN, FUMs, and DON, respectively (Table 1). The average and maximum concentrations of all mycotoxins in the tested feed samples exceeded the quantification limit in the survey results (Table 1). The most annually prevalent mycotoxin in the tested feed samples was DON (Table 1), which was also the most prevalent mycotoxin in cornmeal, with 88.8% in positive samples at an average of 854.6 ppb between 2015 and 2017 (Table 2). The prevalences of ZEN and FUMs in cornmeal were comparable, with 56.1% and 55.8% in positive samples at averages of 68.2 and 696.7 ppb, respectively (Table 2). AFs were present in 35.2% of the positive samples, with an average of 0.8 ppb in cornmeal between 2015 and 2017 (Table 2). The average and maximum concentrations of ZEN, FUMs, and DON in cornmeal exceeded the quantification limit, whereas those of AFs did not (Table 2). In the swine feed samples, DON was the most prevalent mycotoxin in the nursery and pregnancy diets between 2015 and 2017, with 91.1% and 90.5% in positive samples, respectively (Tables 3 and 4). The second most prevalent mycotoxin in the nursery and pregnancy diets was ZEN, with 75.0% and 73.3% in positive samples, with averages of 43.5 and 49.8 ppb, respectively (Tables 3 and 4). AFs were present in 59.6% and 68.0% of the positive samples, with averages of 1.1 and 1.3 ppb in the nursery and pregnancy diets, respectively (Tables 3 and 4). FUMs were the least prevalent mycotoxin in the nursery and pregnancy diets, with 55.4% and 55.8% in positive samples and averages of 523.1 and 638.5 ppb, respectively (Tables 3 and 4). The average and maximum concentrations of all analyzed mycotoxins in the nursery and pregnancy diets exceeded the quantification limit in the survey results (Tables 3 and 4). The yearly trend analysis revealed that the percentage of samples containing DON in cornmeal and corn-meal-based swine feed was stably increased from 2015 to 2017 (Fig. 1a–d). A peak in the percentage of positive AF and ZEN samples were observed in 2016 (Fig. 1a–d). The lowest percentage of positive FUM samples were found in the nursery and pregnancy diets in 2016 (Fig. 1c, d). However, the percentage of samples containing FUM in cornmeal was slightly increased from 2015 to 2017 (Fig. 1b). Furthermore, the co-occurrence of mycotoxins and mycotoxin combinations in cornmeal and corn-meal-based swine feed between 2015 and 2017 was analyzed. The 3-year survey results revealed that 1.0% of the tested samples had mycotoxin levels below the detection limits, 7.7% of the tested samples were contaminated by one mycotoxin, and 91.3% of the tested samples were contaminated by multiple mycotoxins (Table 5). The main mixtures in cornmeal and corn-meal-based swine feed between 2015 and 2017 were AF + ZEN + FUM + DON, AF + ZEN + DON, ZEN + DON and, ZEN + FUM + DON, found in 23.54%, 16.16%, 13.87%, and 12.47%, respectively. Furthermore, 38.17% corresponded to ternary mixtures, 28.25% to binary mixtures, and 23.54% were quaternary mixtures (Table 6). Taken together, these results demonstrated that between 2015 and 2017 in Taiwan, DON was the most prevalent mycotoxin in all types of feed samples, followed by ZEN. In addition, cornmeal and corn-meal-based swine feed were commonly contaminated by multiple mycotoxins and AF + ZEN + FUM + DON was the most observed mixture.
Discussion
In the present survey, we found that AFs, ZEN, FUMs, and DON were respectively present in 58.0%, 72.2%, 50.4%, and 91.4% of the analyzed samples between 2015 and 2017 in Taiwan. DON was the most prevalent mycotoxin in all types of feed samples, including cornmeal and the pregnancy and nursery diets. Furthermore, only 1% of the tested samples were below the detection limits, 7.7% of the feed samples tested positive for the presence of one mycotoxin, and 91.3% were contaminated by multiple mycotoxins.
Globally, mycotoxin contamination in feed has an impact on animal health and the economy (Wu 2007; Bryden 2012). A worldwide survey of mycotoxin prevalence revealed that 25%, 27%, 36%, 54%, and 55% of feed samples tested positive for contamination with OTA, AFs, ZEN, FUMs, and DON from 2004 to 2011 (Streit et al. 2013a). In North Asia and Taiwan, the most prevalent mycotoxin in feed samples was DON, with 70.0% in positive samples, followed by ZEN, FUMs, OTA, and AFs, with 57.0%, 43.0%, 20.0%, and 12.0%, respectively (Rodrigues and Naehrer 2012a). Similarly, the present survey found that DON was highly prevalent in feed and feed ingredients, with 91.4% in positive samples in Taiwan between 2015 and 2017; DON was followed in terms of prevalence by ZEN, AFs, and FUMs. Furthermore, cornmeal and finished feed were commonly contaminated by DON in Taiwan. These results were consistent with those of Rodrigues and Naehrer (2012a and b). However, the demands on feed and animal producers for OTA analysis are low in Taiwan compared with those for analysis of other mycotoxins. The prevalence of OTA in cornmeal and corn-meal-based swine feed was not reported in the current survey. Therefore, the observed annual ranking of mycotoxin prevalence in feed samples may differ from those reported elsewhere. In summary, feed and feed ingredients are commonly contaminated by DON worldwide. The feed samples collected in Taiwan had the highest incidence of DON contamination compared with other locations.
Several mycotoxins are found simultaneously in feed and feed ingredients and exert adverse effects on animals because of combined mycotoxicosis (Speijers and Speijers 2004; Pierron et al. 2016). A global survey conducted between 2005 and 2011 reported that mycotoxins were undetectable in 16% of feed samples, whereas 26% of the samples were contaminated by one mycotoxin and 58% contained multiple mycotoxins (Streit et al. 2013a). Between 2009 and 2011, 6% of a selection of feed samples in Asia tested negative for mycotoxins, whereas 12% were contaminated by one mycotoxin and 82% tested positive for multiple mycotoxins (Rodrigues and Naehrer 2012b). In the present study, we ascertained that between 2015 and 2017 in Taiwan, 1.0% of the collected feed samples had mycotoxin levels below the detection limits, 7.7% were contaminated by one mycotoxin, and 91.3% were contaminated by multiple mycotoxins. Weather may be a critical factor contributing to the high incidence of mycotoxin co-occurrence in feed in Taiwan. Because the climate in Taiwan is relatively hot in summer and humid in winter compared with other Asian countries, mycotoxin-producing molds can thrive on feed and feed ingredients because of abundant moisture in the environment. Furthermore, abnormal weather conditions such as drought and excessive rain markedly increase mycotoxin contamination levels (Magan et al. 2011). These phenomena seemingly increase the prevalence of multimycotoxin contamination in Asia. However, safe tolerance levels in animals may differ according to interactions between mycotoxins. Thus, the additive and synergistic toxic effects caused by multimycotoxin contamination in feed on animals must be considered in future studies.
In Taiwan, the percentage of addition of mycotoxin binders in swine feed is 70% in nursery diet and 95% in pregnancy diet, respectively. It is reported that the adsorption efficacy of binders or adsorbents is limited to only a few mycotoxins. Further, based on the current survey of mycotoxin prevalence, an alternative strategy for efficient detoxification of mycotoxins is required in Taiwan. Mycotoxin binders in combination with enzymatic or microbial detoxification might be a feasible approach. In addition, boosting the immune system by natural immunomodulating agent is also an alternative strategy for reduction of adverse effects caused by mycotoxins on animals. Further, the permissible limit of AFs in swine feed is 50 ppb in Taiwan. However, no maximum admitted levels for other mycotoxins are established in Taiwan. In the present study, the AF concentrations in feed and feed ingredients comply with the maximum admitted levels in Taiwan. However, it is still needed to establish the permissible limit of other mycotoxins, such as ZEN, FUM, and DON, in feed and feed ingredients in the future.
Several mycotoxins and their metabolites were identified in fungus and plants by using chromatographic and immunochemical methods (Berthiller et al. 2013). However, only OTA, AFs, ZEN, FUMs, and DON have been broadly examined in animal feed and feed ingredients (Streit et al. 2013a; Murugesan et al. 2015). Some modified mycotoxins—so-called masked mycotoxins—are metabolites that normally remain inactive and undetectable during analysis for parent mycotoxins (Freire and Sant’Ana 2018). These modified mycotoxins can transform into active parent mycotoxins in the gastrointestinal tracts of animals (Freire and Sant’Ana 2018). The global prevalence of mycotoxins in feed and feed ingredients has been surveyed annually by various research groups (Cheng et al. 2002; Streit et al. 2013a; Pinotti et al. 2016; Abudabos et al. 2017); however, the prevalence of masked mycotoxins in feed and feed ingredients remains unclear. In addition, the toxicities of individual and combined masked mycotoxins in animals remain to be investigated in future studies.
Currently, immunochemical and chromatographic methods are widely used for the detection of mycotoxins in feed (Murugesan et al. 2015). The immunochemical method, such as ELISA, is defined as routine screening which could be performed with commercially available test kits. The advantages of ELISA method are minimal sample preparation and simple measurement procedure. However, the limitations of ELISA method are cross-reactivity to similar compounds and low sensitivity compared to chromatographic methods. The chromatographic methods, such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS), are able to detect multiple mycotoxins simultaneously in a sample due to high specificity and sensitivity (Rodrigues and Naehrer 2012a; Streit et al. 2013b). In the future, the use of the latest analytical methods, such as LC-MS, will increase the precision on the determination of the concentrations of multiple mycotoxins present in swine feed of Taiwan.
In conclusion, 3289 mycotoxin analyses were performed on 820 samples between 2015 and 2017 in Taiwan. Among the tested samples, DON was the most prevalent mycotoxin in cornmeal and corn-meal-based swine feed. In addition, a high incidence of contamination by multiple mycotoxins was observed in the tested samples. Sustainable surveying and understanding of the prevalence of mycotoxins could provide valuable information for feed and animal producers and improve animal health by implementing mycotoxin management strategies in livestock industries.
References
Abudabos AM, Al-Atiyat RM, Khan RU (2017) A survey of mycotoxin contamination and chemical composition of distiller's dried grains with solubles (DDGS) imported from the USA into Saudi Arabia. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24:15401–15405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9130-2
Berthiller F, Crews C, Dall'Asta C, Saeger SD, Haesaert G, Karlovsky P, Oswald IP, Seefelder W, Speijers G, Stroka J (2013) Masked mycotoxins: a review. Mol Nutr Food Res 57:165–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201100764
Bryden WL (2012) Mycotoxin contamination of the feed supply chain: Implications for animal productivity and feed security. Anim Feed Sci Technol 173:134–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.014
Cheng YH, Wu JF, Lee DN, Yang CM (2002) Prevalence of fumonisin contamination in corn and corn-based feeds in Taiwan. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 15:610–614
Freire L, Sant'Ana AS (2018) Modified mycotoxins: an updated review on their formation, detection, occurrence, and toxic effects. Food Chem Toxicol 111:189–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2017.11.021
Grenier B, Applegate TJ (2013) Modulation of intestinal functions following mycotoxin ingestion: meta-analysis of published experiments in animals. Toxins (Basel) 5:396–430. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins5020396
Hussein HS, Brasel JM (2001) Toxicity, metabolism, and impact of mycotoxins on humans and animals. Toxicology 167:101–134
Magan N, Medina A, Aldred D (2011) Possible climate-change effects on mycotoxin contamination of food crops pre- and postharvest. Plant Pathol 60:150–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02412.x
Murugesan GR, Ledoux DR, Naehrer K, Berthiller F, Applegate TJ, Grenier B, Phillips TD, Schatzmayr G (2015) Prevalence and effects of mycotoxins on poultry health and performance, and recent development in mycotoxin counteracting strategies. Poult Sci 94:1298–1315. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev075
Pierron A, Alassane-Kpembi I, Oswald IP (2016) Impact of two mycotoxins deoxynivalenol and fumonisin on pig intestinal health. Porcine Health Manag 2(21):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-016-0041-2
Pinotti L, Ottoboni M, Giromini C, Dell'Orto V, Cheli F (2016) Mycotoxin contamination in the EU feed supply chain: a focus on cereal byproducts. Toxins (Basel) 8:45. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8020045
Richard J (2006) Sampling and sample preparation for mycotoxin analysis. Romer Labs Guide to Mycotoxins. Romer Labs. Inc, Missouri
Rodrigues I, Naehrer K (2012a) Prevalence of mycotoxins in feedstuffs and feed surveyed worldwide in 2009 and 2010. Phytopathol Mediterr 51:175–192. https://doi.org/10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-9693
Rodrigues I, Naehrer K (2012b) A three-year survey on the worldwide occurrence of mycotoxins in feedstuffs and feed. Toxins (Basel) 4:663–675. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins4090663
Speijers GJ, Speijers MH (2004) Combined toxic effects of mycotoxins. Toxicol Lett 153:91–98
Streit E, Naehrer K, Rodrigues I, Schatzmayr G (2013a) Mycotoxin occurrence in feed and feed raw materials worldwide: long-term analysis with special focus on Europe and Asia. J Sci Food Agric 93:2892–2899. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6225
Streit E, Schwab C, Sulyok M, Naehrer K, Krska R, Schatzmayr G (2013b) Multi-mycotoxin screening reveals the occurrence of 139 different secondary metabolites in feed and feed ingredients. Toxins (Basel) 5:504–523. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins5030504
Tseng TC, Liu CY (1999) Natural occurrence of fumonisins B(1) and B(2) in domestic maize of Taiwan. J Agric Food Chem 47:4799–4801
Tseng TC, Liu CY (2001) Occurrence of fumonisin B1 in maize imported into Taiwan. Int J Food Microbiol 65:23–26
Whitaker TB (2006) Sampling foods for mycotoxins. Food Addit Contam 23:50–61
Wu F (2007) Measuring the economic impacts of Fusarium toxins in animal feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol 137:363–374
Zain ME (2011) Impact of mycotoxins on humans and animals. J Saudi Chem Soc 15:129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2010.06.006
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, CK., Cheng, YH., Tsai, WT. et al. Prevalence of mycotoxins in feed and feed ingredients between 2015 and 2017 in Taiwan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 23798–23806 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05659-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05659-0