Abstract
In recent years, Healthcare 4.0, the fourth healthcare revolution, has piqued the interest of numerous researchers around the world. Healthcare 4.0 is a relatively new term that has evolved from Industry 4.0 to meet diverse requirements in the healthcare domain. Healthcare 4.0 serves as a technological catalyst for accelerated growth by integrating cutting-edge industrial technologies. Despite the evolving nature of Healthcare 4.0 research, a complete and systematic survey of recent research on it has been scarce. Conspicuously, this study intends to present a systematic survey by investigating the recent trends, key constraints, and application areas of Healthcare 4.0. Further, a comprehensive survey of the research is used to identify the essential technologies required for the effective adoption of Healthcare 4.0. The research was conducted using the PRISMA methodology and an exhaustive search of all easily accessible libraries and academic repositories was made to obtain the relevant literature. At last, a diversity of outstanding issues are also presented to assist scholars and professionals who are interested in undertaking futuristic research in the current field.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Healthcare 4.0, the fourth healthcare revolution is the realization of the concept of accelerating medical innovation while improving the efficiency of patient care. Healthcare 4.0 refers to the recent breakthroughs in the medical domain through the introduction of automation, management, and information processing systems. Healthcare 4.0 is interpreted as the enhanced interconnection between cyber and physical aspects, and interconnection solutions provided by innovative information and communication technologies such as Big Data, the Internet of Things (IoT), and cloud computing [1, 2]. The integration of these technologies forms the Healthcare 4.0 systems, which is believed to provide real-time personalized healthcare to patients, physicians, and caregivers [3]. In the wake of tremendous advances in medical devices, clinical advances, and data analytics, there has been a growing interest in utilizing engineering approaches to deliver healthcare services throughout the world. These technological innovations have opened up immense possibilities for innovation, as well as significant concerns for healthcare delivery.
The implementation of Healthcare 4.0, in particular, supports the transition from a hospital-centred system to a patient-centred organization, in which multiple departments, roles, and responsibilities are merged to provide optimal patient healthcare outcomes. Healthcare 4.0 enhances the capabilities of the traditional medical system which helps to strategize support in terms of providing quality care remotely [4]. The goal of Healthcare 4.0 is to improve patient experience, health promotion, cost control, and clinical satisfaction. It encompasses the deployment of processing capabilities for data management and offers the flexibility to access information regardless of location. Such revolutionary changes can bring about a significant impact on every aspect of our society that has started to embrace these technological innovations. Therefore, despite its benefits, there are many concerns about the successful implementation of Healthcare 4.0 as given in [5].
Despite significant progress in smart and connected healthcare, further research, innovation, dissemination, and impact will be required to achieve Healthcare 4.0. Accordingly, this paper conducts a systematic review of Healthcare 4.0 and provides a glance at the topic, relevance, and various outcomes by focusing on the corpus of previous research, utilizing the online available scientific databases and digital libraries. The purpose of this study is to explore the transition to Healthcare 4.0, outline the different key pillars, highlight various application areas, and identify challenges and prospects for Healthcare 4.0 research.
The rest of the paper is structured as follows. Section 2 describes the approach used to conduct the review. Section 3 discusses revolutions in healthcare. Section 4 includes a description of key technologies. A review of recent works in Healthcare 4.0 is provided in Sect. 5. Section 6 describes important healthcare application areas. In Sect. 7, we explore some of the most pressing open challenges and issues. The discussion over research questions is presented in Sect. 8. Finally, Sect. 9 provides a summary of the paper.
2 Research methodology
The systematic research work is carried out and presented using the PRISMA approach outlined by Moher et al. [6]. Subsequent sections provide an in-depth insight into each action taken to achieve this research goal.
2.1 Research questions
In the presented work, we thoroughly evaluate the research procedures employed by numerous researchers by proposing some salient research questions. The research questions formulated to complete this study are enlisted in Table 1.
2.2 Search criteria and sources of information
To carry out this review, we explored various research studies published in the area of healthcare using modern technologies. Table 2 shows the various online databases and digital libraries that have been used to perform the study. Nonetheless, with the advent of smart medical devices and computing technologies, we are witnessing remarkable advances in smart and connected healthcare. However, in this study, we mainly emphasized relevant papers published in the interval from 2017 to 2022. In order to retrieve the most relevant papers related to the current study, the following search terms are considered, following the PRISMA approach.
-
Healthcare
-
Diagnosis OR Prediction
-
Industry 4.0 technologies
-
classification
-
Personalized OR Ambient healthcare
-
Tele-medicine OR E-care
2.3 Inclusion and exclusion criteria for article selection
In the first stage, 441 quality papers are selected from different scientific databases and libraries as mentioned in Table 2. These selected papers are examined based on the inclusion-exclusion criteria enlisted in Table 3. In the next screening step, only 64 papers are selected out of the initial 441 papers. In the next phase, each paper is examined and the papers with irrelevant abstracts and review studies are excluded which results in selection of 46 papers for the systematic analysis. Figure 1 illustrates the flow-chart of paper selection procedure.
3 Evolution of Healthcare
Healthcare is continuously focused on providing quality care services to its patients and other stakeholders. Several revolutions in the healthcare industry have been witnessed in the past few decades that transformed the healthcare domain to new heights with several major innovations [7]. The major and advanced innovations that occurred in each of these revolutions are briefly explained below and presented in Fig. 2.
Healthcare 1.0: The healthcare sector had its first revolution, known as Healthcare 1.0, in the latter 1990s, with an emphasis on increasing service efficiency and minimizing bureaucracy [8]. The innovation turned a generous system of home medications and unskilled clinicians providing paternalistic care into a much more advanced, smart, and data-centric system known as the medical-industrial complex. Automation was first introduced in this revolution with the incorporation of administrative systems.
Healthcare 2.0: The goal of the second healthcare revolution was to boost efficiency and data exchange. Sharing of information was centred not only inside one institution but also within a group of related healthcare organizations. The new revolution focused on responding according to the symptom, illness, and individual requirements [9].
Healthcare 3.0: Healthcare 3.0 emphasized proactive care and could guarantee preventative treatment prior to the beginning of an illness or disease symptoms [10]. Along with other important technologies like big data analytics and wearables powered by the Internet of Things, electronic medical records (EMR) were also widely used in this revolution.
Healthcare 4.0: A paradigm shift from proactive care in Healthcare 3.0 results in predictive care and a more patient-centric approach rather than a hospital-centric approach, i.e., Healthcare 4.0, which delivers patient empowerment in addition to a cost-effective and mobile healthcare ecosystem. This revolution is dedicated to current and future technologies, with a focus on the use of cutting-edge technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI), and big data analytics to provide high-quality care [11].
4 Key technologies of Healthcare 4.0
Healthcare 4.0 promotes the digitization of healthcare through the use of advanced technologies. These technologies provide patients with greater reliability, convenience, satisfaction, and transparency. This section outlines some of the important technologies used in Healthcare 4.0 to improve healthcare outcomes. Figure 3 depicts various key technologies for Healthcare 4.0.
4.1 Cyber-physical systems
Cyber-physical systems (CPS) are an essential part of Healthcare 4.0 that interconnects the physical and virtual worlds [12]. These systems are increasingly deployed in hospitals to provide consistently high-quality services. CPS has a major impact on healthcare and medical applications, and it quickly provides a platform for positive communication between patients, clinicians, and health personnel.
4.2 Internet of things
The Internet of Things (IoT) is enabling a revolutionary field of opportunity in healthcare. To give patients more control over their lives and treatments, it connects to the internet and medical devices and collects vital information. It is beneficial for testing, evaluating, and treating patients to improve overall satisfaction [13]. A health service based on the Internet of Things combines all available resources as a system to carry out activities, including diagnosis, tracking, and virtual operations electronically.
4.3 Cloud computing
Cloud computing is a newly formed computing paradigm that aims to provide a variety of computing services over networked media such as the Internet [14]. This strategy provides various benefits to potential customers, including pay-as-you-go, scalability, online delivery of software and virtual hardware services, and the elimination of the need for businesses to own, operate, and upgrade their software and hardware infrastructures. In healthcare, the services of cloud computing infrastructure are used for the computation of data using third-party data centres. Moreover, it also provides services for efficient storage of patients’, and hospital data [15].
4.4 Fog computing
To meet current medical concerns, cloud computing alone is not the ideal option. Additionally, the Healthcare 4.0 environment’s needs are not met by the services and applications directly offered via cloud computing. It has certain drawbacks, including low real-time response and delay. A minor delay in healthcare might cost a patient his or her life; so, to improve services and applications, healthcare also utilizes the potential of fog computing to offer quality services in a delay-sensitive environment [16].
4.5 Machine learning
The health sector uses artificial intelligence to examine a variety of medical data. It is an important piece of technology that is created and run by machines with the aid of a computer. It gathers data and gives doctors and patients properly demarcated output [17]. AI provides techniques for treatment and prevention to enhance patients’ life expectancy. It aids in personalized medicine, diagnosis, severity determination, drug development, and patient monitoring.
4.6 Blockchain
A blockchain is a distributed public ledger that is secured by a peer-to-peer network and registers transactions and maintains assets without the need for centralized authority. The records on the blockchain are grouped in a logical block structure. These blocks are linked sequentially one after the other, and the entire chain is referred to as a blockchain. Blocks placed anywhere on the blockchain cannot be changed without changing other blocks [18].
5 Review of recent works in Healthcare 4.0
This section summarises various research works carried out by numerous researchers worldwide. These works are presented by considering multiple parameters, such as major contributions, Healthcare (HC), Cyber-physical Systems (CPS), Internet of Things (IoT), Cloud Computing (CC), Machine Learning (ML), Prediction Systems (PS), Alert Generation (AG), and Fog Computing (FC).
6 Application areas of Healthcare 4.0
The use of Healthcare 4.0 technologies is a matter of the future. These technologies are affecting almost all spheres of our lives. The novel revolution of Healthcare 4.0 can offer several applications in the following scenarios.
-
Monitoring physiological and pathological signals: The adoption of advanced medical and environmental sensors such as accelerometers, temperature and humidity sensors, as well as ECG, glucose, blood pressure, and gas sensors-enables continuous monitoring of patient’s physiological and pathological health attributes [19]. These attributes can be used to monitor and provide quality care services to patients.
-
Self management, wellness monitoring and prevention: Self-management solutions are widely encouraged in Healthcare 4.0. These solutions can use algorithms to help prevent disease by identifying modifiable risk indicators and developing strategies to change health behaviours [20].
-
Personalized healthcare and recommender systems: Recommender Systems are one of the most important innovations in Healthcare 4.0 that are responsible for identifying user’s needs by speculating the data from the user-item interactions automatically [61]. These are used to provide personalized care to patients and to facilitate healthcare tips based on users’ needs. These have also been used to recommend doctors to patients based on medical history.
-
Telemedicine and disease monitoring: Telemedicine is characterised by the provision of medical services where location is a key issue for medical practitioners to share diagnostic information over long distances using information and communication technologies [62]. In the current scenario of the Covid-19 pandemic, it is very risky to move to the hospitals for routine checkups. Health 4.0 provides telemedicine services in these critical scenarios. Several diseases such as diabetes and chronic respiratory failure have been monitored and treated in past through the application of telemedicine.
-
Assisted living: Assisted living (AL) lies somewhere between community care and the nursing home [63]. Health 4.0 provides various services for AL that are generally used for elderly patients wherein critical parameters are continuously sensed and transmitted to a central hub. Based on the deviation in any of the parameters, emergency assistance is provided to these patients.
7 Open issues and challenges
Although the use of Healthcare 4.0 technologies has resulted in a wide range of healthcare frameworks, many research issues and challenges need to be addressed for real-time implementation. Figure 4 presents various challenges for the implementation of Healthcare 4.0.
7.1 Data diversity and management
The healthcare frameworks confront data from a multitude of sources, such as electronic medical records, user apps, IoT devices, etc. Such data is commonly interpreted as big data and is subject to the 5 V’s of big data: volume, value, veracity, variety, and velocity. Due to the diversity of data sources, building machine learning models based on such heterogeneous data is time-consuming and tedious. Consequently, standard protocols and formats are essential to managing extremely disparate data from multiple data sources, such as text, picture files, and so on.
7.2 Scalability
Healthcare 4.0 should be extended up to the entire country or region to meet the escalating expectations of patients and encourage improved health operations. It would save patients’ time waiting for consultations and reports and hence provide immediate access to a certain level of medical services.
7.3 Resource provisioning
The emergence of a multitude of applications has led to the generation of a massive amount of data. It is imperative to store, analyze and interpret massive amounts of data in real time. In a highly unpredictable and dynamically changing environment, communication and computationally intensive resources are inevitably limited. To mitigate this, autonomous resource management strategies must be implemented so that these resources are readily available when needed.
7.4 Security and privacy
Healthcare 4.0 has enormous potential to enhance patient health outcomes and experience by delivering real-time services. However, addressing the privacy and security of any healthcare framework is a persistent and significant challenge as hackers are increasingly interested in health data. This puts patients’ data at tremendous risk. Hence, significant steps are required to ensure the security and privacy of data at different stages when designing healthcare systems.
7.5 Standardization
Another critical issue is the lack of healthcare regulations. This aspect has enormous implications for security, privacy, data transfer, and synchronization between layers. To solve this problem, standardization activities are necessary, such as a dedicated organization to standardize healthcare technology. It facilitates real-time response and resolution of data discrepancies. In addition, a well-established regulatory system must be put in place ahead of patients for proper tracking and management.
7.6 User friendly interfaces
End-users of healthcare services should be included in the development team to share their insights, preferences, and concerns. As a result, Healthcare 4.0 will have a user-friendly interface and patient-centred care.
8 Discussions and implications
The proliferation of information and communication technologies profoundly affects every aspect of life, including the health industry. Our systematic survey has helped us to find answers to various research questions as laid down earlier in Sect. 2. The first research question, RQ1, aimed to find answers to various revolutions in the healthcare domain. To answer this question, a thorough study has been conducted to determine the significant and advanced innovations that occurred in each of these revolutions. Table 4 has been presented, which shows each revolution’s main objective and focus. Besides, different technologies and methods are also presented along with the limitations of each revolution. It is clear from the study that the current revolution focuses on predictive care and is more patient-centric rather than traditional hospital-centric. Future researchers will focus on developing real-time applications to meet the current needs of healthcare. Healthcare 4.0 is characterized by continuous integration, digital systems, and the implementation of electronics and information technology (IT) to provide a range of services. RQ2 attempted to analyze the various key technologies particularly used in the healthcare domain. Figure 3 shows the range of particularly popular technologies among researchers. Many research works use IoT-based medical devices for data acquisition. The collected data is analyzed using machine-learning techniques over the fog-cloud integrated platform. Moreover, to ensure the security of the data, numerous researchers implemented blockchain technology. RQ3 finds an answer to the different application scenarios of Healthcare 4.0. The current study has identified the critical areas of healthcare contexts to deliver services. Various application areas, recommender systems, and remote monitoring are prevalent among researchers, and a lot of work is in progress. The answers to RQ4 are achieved by exploring in-depth literature of current works in the healthcare domain. A comparative analysis based on many key technologies is also presented in the related domains of study. RQ5 aimed to identify future challenges and open issues to advance research in healthcare. One of the prime challenges found in the literature is the security and privacy of healthcare data. Future research will focus on exploring these challenges that emerged from the current study (Table 5).
9 Conclusion
This article provides readers with insights into different aspects of successfully implementing Healthcare 4.0. The survey was conducted using the PRISMA method, in which articles from different databases were explored for article selection. The survey is divided into five distinct sections. The first part discussed the various revolutions, starting from Healthcare 1.0 to Healthcare 4.0. The second part outlines various vital technologies necessary for successful implementation. The third part broadly discussed various implementation frameworks of Healthcare 4.0, utilizing the widely available key technologies. The fourth part highlighted distinct application areas of Healthcare 4.0 and their applicability. Finally, the last part highlighted the open issues and research challenges in Healthcare 4.0. Identifying trends, issues, and theoretical gaps through this scoping assessment has been the first step in developing such a road map, enabling the first mapping and integration of the body of knowledge on Healthcare 4.0. Consequently, future research will focus on leveraging the theoretical integration of the literature obtained in this work as a conceptual basis for constructing a road map for implementing Healthcare 4.0.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
Chandra, M., Kumar, K., Thakur, P., Chattopadhyaya, S., Alam, F., & Kumar, S. (2022). Digital technologies, healthcare and covid-19: Insights from developing and emerging nations. Health and Technology, 12(2), 1–22.
Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239–242.
Thuemmler, C., & Bai, C. (2017). Health 4.0: Application of industry 4.0 design principles in future asthma management. In Health 4.0: How virtualization and big data are revolutionizing healthcare (pp. 23–37). Springer.
Nino-Tapias, G., Shaw, J., & Coutinho, A. (2022). Impact of the transition to telehealth on healthcare providers at a large, urban FQHC in the early covid-19 pandemic.
Wolf, B., & Scholze, C. (2018). Medicine 4.0, the importance of electronics, information technology and microsystems in modern medicine-the case of customized chemotherapy. Medecine Sciences M/S, 34(5), 456–461.
Panic, N., Leoncini, E., De Belvis, G., Ricciardi, W., & Boccia, S. (2013). Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (prisma) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e83138.
Jayaraman, P. P., Forkan, A. R. M., Morshed, A., Haghighi, P. D., & Kang, Y.-B. (2020). Healthcare 4.0: A review of frontiers in digital health. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(2), e1350.
Chanchaichujit, J., Tan, A., Meng, F., & Eaimkhong, S. (2019). An introduction to Healthcare 4.0. In Healthcare 4.0 (pp. 1–15). Springer.
Randeree, E. (2009). Exploring technology impacts of healthcare 2.0 initiatives. Telemedicine and e-Health, 15(3), 255–260.
Pillay, R. (2018). Healthcare 3.0: How technology is driving the transition to prosumers, platforms and outsurance. Xlibris Corporation.
Kumari, A., Tanwar, S., Tyagi, S., & Kumar, N. (2018). Fog computing for healthcare 4.0 environment: Opportunities and challenges. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 72, 1–13.
Dey, N., Ashour, A. S., Shi, F., Fong, S. J., & Tavares, J. M. R. (2018). Medical cyber-physical systems: A survey. Journal of Medical Systems, 42(4), 1–13.
Yuehong, Y., Zeng, Y., Chen, X., & Fan, Y. (2016). The internet of things in healthcare: An overview. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 1, 3–13.
Jain, V., & Kumar, B. (2022). Auction based cost-efficient resource allocation by utilizing blockchain in fog computing. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 33(7), e4469.
Calabrese, B., & Cannataro, M. (2015). Cloud computing in healthcare and biomedicine. Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience, 16(1), 1–18.
Kishor, A., Chakraborty, C., & Jeberson, W. (2021). Intelligent healthcare data segregation using fog computing with internet of things and machine learning. International Journal of Engineering Systems Modelling and Simulation, 12(2–3), 188–194.
Sriramalakshmi, P., Rajkumar, S. P., & Nivedhithaa, R. (2022). Modern machine learning and IoT applications for personalized healthcare: Opportunities and challenges. Transformation in Healthcare with Emerging Technologies, 199–216.
Attaran, M. (2022). Blockchain technology in healthcare: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 15(1), 70–83.
Farahani, B., Firouzi, F., & Chakrabarty, K. (2020). Healthcare IoT. In Intelligent Internet of Things (pp. 515–545). Springer.
Khanra, S., Dhir, A., Islam, A. N., & Mäntymäki, M. (2020). Big data analytics in healthcare: A systematic literature review. Enterprise Information Systems, 14(7), 878–912.
Abdel-Basset, M., Chang, V., & Nabeeh, N. A. (2021). An intelligent framework using disruptive technologies for covid-19 analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120431.
Kaur, J., Verma, R., Alharbe, N. R., Agrawal, A., & Khan, R. A. (2021). Importance of fog computing in healthcare 4.0. In Fog computing for Healthcare 4.0 environments (pp. 79–101). Springer.
Ali, Z., Imran, M., & Shoaib, M. (2021). An IoT-based smart healthcare system to detect dysphonia. Neural Computing and Applications, 34(14), 1–11.
Jain, R., Gupta, M., Nayyar, A., & Sharma, N. (2021). Adoption of fog computing in healthcare 4.0. In Fog computing for healthcare 4.0 environments (pp. 3–36). Springer.
Hanumantharaju, R., Kumar, D. P., Sowmya, B., Siddesh, G., Shreenath, K., & Srinivasa, K. (2021). Enabling technologies for fog computing in healthcare 4.0: Challenges and future implications. In Fog computing for healthcare 4.0 environments (pp. 157–176). Springer.
Mansour, R. F., El Amraoui, A., Nouaouri, I., Díaz, V. G., Gupta, D., & Kumar, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and internet of things enabled disease diagnosis model for smart healthcare systems. IEEE Access, 9, 45137–45146.
Subiksha, K., & Ramakrishnan, M. (2021). Smart healthcare analytics solutions using deep learning AI. In Proceedings of international conference on recent trends in machine learning, IoT, smart cities and applications (pp. 707–714). Springer.
Tripathi, G., Ahad, M. A., & Paiva, S. (2020). S2hs-a blockchain based approach for smart healthcare system. Healthcare, 8, 100391.
Anand, A., Singh, A. K., Lv, Z., & Bhatnagar, G. (2020). Compression-then-encryption-based secure watermarking technique for smart healthcare system. IEEE MultiMedia, 27(4), 133–143.
Islam, M. M., Rahaman, A., & Islam, M. R. (2020). Development of smart healthcare monitoring system in IoT environment. SN Computer Science, 1, 1–11.
Shukla, R. G., Agarwal, A., & Shukla, S. (2020). Blockchain-powered smart healthcare system. In Handbook of research on blockchain technology (pp. 245–270). Elsevier.
Ali, F., El-Sappagh, S., Islam, S. R., Kwak, D., Ali, A., Imran, M., & Kwak, K.-S. (2020). A smart healthcare monitoring system for heart disease prediction based on ensemble deep learning and feature fusion. Information Fusion, 63, 208–222.
Ambarkar, S. S., & Shekokar, N. N. (2020) Toward smart and secure IoT based healthcare system. In Internet of things, smart computing and technology: A roadmap ahead (pp. 283–303). Springer.
Patan, R., Ghantasala, G. P., Sekaran, R., Gupta, D., & Ramachandran, M. (2020). Smart healthcare and quality of service in IoT using grey filter convolutional based cyber physical system. Sustainable Cities and Society, 59, 102141.
Karunarathne, S. M., Saxena, N., & Khan, M. K. (2021). Security and privacy in IoT smart healthcare. IEEE Internet Computing, 25, 37–48.
Selvaraj, S., & Sundaravaradhan, S. (2020). Challenges and opportunities in IoT healthcare systems: A systematic review. SN Applied Sciences, 2(1), 1–8.
Khatoon, A. (2020). A blockchain-based smart contract system for healthcare management. Electronics, 9(1), 94.
Hu, N., Su, S., Tang, C., & Wang, L. (2020). Wearable-sensors based activity recognition for smart human healthcare using internet of things. In International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC) (pp. 1909–1915). IEEE.
Zahin, A., & Hu, R. Q., et al. (2020). A machine learning based framework for the smart healthcare system. In Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
Aazam, M., Zeadally, S., & Harras, K. A. (2020). Health fog for smart healthcare. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 9(2), 96–102.
Dilibal, Ç. (2020). Development of edge-IoMT computing architecture for smart healthcare monitoring platform. In 4th International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.
Pawar, U., OShea, D., Rea, S., & OReilly, R. Explainable AI in healthcare. In 2020 International Conference on Cyber Situational Awareness, Data Analytics and Assessment (CyberSA) (pp. 1–2). IEEE.
Sanghavi, J. (2020). Review of smart healthcare systems and applications for smart cities. In ICCCE 2019 (pp. 325–331). Springer.
Sivan, D., & Sellappa, M. (2020). Proximity-based cloud resource provisioning for deep learning applications in smart healthcare. Expert Systems, 39(7), e12524.
Bhatia, M., Kaur, S., Sood, S. K., & Behal, V. (2020). Internet of things-inspired healthcare system for urine-based diabetes prediction. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 107, 101913.
Rathi, M., Jain, N., Bist, P., & Agrawal, T. (2020). Smart healthcare model: An end-to-end framework for disease prediction and recommendation of drugs and hospitals. In High performance vision intelligence (pp. 245–264). Springer.
Newaz, A. I., Sikder, A. K., Rahman , M. A., Uluagac, A. S. (2019). Healthguard: A machine learning-based security framework for smart healthcare systems. In 2019 Sixth International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS) (pp. 389–396). IEEE.
Pandey, I., Dutta, H. S., & Banerjee, J. S. (2019). Wban: A smart approach to next generation e-healthcare system. In 2019 3rd International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC) (pp. 344–349). IEEE.
Mohapatra, S., Mohanty, S., & Mohanty, S. (2019). Smart healthcare: An approach for ubiquitous healthcare management using IoT. In Big data analytics for intelligent healthcare management (pp. 175–196). Elsevier.
Dahiya, A. S., Thireau, J., Boudaden, J., Lal, S., Gulzar, U., Zhang, Y., et al. (2019). Energy autonomous wearable sensors for smart healthcare: A review. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 167(3), 037516.
Cai, Q., Wang, H., Li, Z., & Liu, X. (2019). A survey on multimodal data-driven smart healthcare systems: Approaches and applications. IEEE Access, 7, 133583–133599.
Algarni, A. (2019). A survey and classification of security and privacy research in smart healthcare systems. IEEE Access, 7, 101879–101894.
Javaid, M., & Haleem, A. (2019). Industry 4.0 applications in medical field: A brief review. Current Medicine Research and Practice, 9(3), 102–109.
Renuka, K., Kumari, S., & Li, X. (2019). Design of a secure three-factor authentication scheme for smart healthcare. Journal of Medical Systems, 43(5), 133.
Hussain, T., Muhammad, K., Khan, S., Ullah, A., Lee, M. Y., & Baik, S. W. (2019). Intelligent baby behavior monitoring using embedded vision in IoT for smart healthcare centers. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Systems, 1(1), 110–124.
Ghoneim, A., Muhammad, G., Amin, S. U., & Gupta, B. (2018). Medical image forgery detection for smart healthcare. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56(4), 33–37.
Naik, S., & Sudarshan, E. (2019). Smart healthcare monitoring system using raspberry pi on IoT platform. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 14(4), 872–876.
Alhussein, M., Muhammad, G., Hossain, M. S., & Amin, S. U. (2018). Cognitive IoT-cloud integration for smart healthcare: Case study for epileptic seizure detection and monitoring. Mobile Networks and Applications, 23(6), 1624–1635.
Syed, L., Jabeen, S., Manimala, S., & Alsaeedi, A. (2019). Smart healthcare framework for ambient assisted living using IoMT and big data analytics techniques. Future Generation Computer Systems, 101, 136–151.
Lin, K., Pankaj, S., & Wang, D. (2018). Task offloading and resource allocation for edge-of-things computing on smart healthcare systems. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 72, 348–360.
Tran, T. N. T., Felfernig, A., Trattner, C., & Holzinger, A. (2020). Recommender systems in the healthcare domain: State-of-the-art and research issues. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 57(1), 1–31.
Ambrosino, N., Vitacca, M., Dreher, M., Isetta, V., Montserrat, J. M., Tonia, T., et al. (2016). Tele-monitoring of ventilator-dependent patients: A European respiratory society statement. European Respiratory Journal, 48(3), 648–663.
Rashidi, P., & Mihailidis, A. (2012). A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 17(3), 579–590.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, A., Singh, A. Healthcare 4.0: recent advancements and futuristic research directions. Wireless Pers Commun 129, 933–952 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-10164-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-10164-8