Abstract
The much-awaited year—2021 that promises to deliver a great deal on the 5th generation (5G) wireless systems' expectations is finally here. Several solutions have been proposed to deal with the energy challenges in the evolving wireless systems, especially in 5G and beyond. These solutions have considered among other approaches, design of new network architecture based on the employment of new radio access techniques called cloud radio access networks (C-RAN), the use of heterogeneous networks approaches, the introduction of renewable energy (RE) as an alternative source of power, etc. Nonetheless, this paper's focus is ultimately on the approaches to achieve optimal energy-efficient (EE) in 5G and beyond networks based on an emerging design philosophy that promises higher overall system capacity at a low energy cost. It focuses on four key EE solutions for future wireless systems: EE resource allocation, network planning, RE, and C-RAN. It discusses various related work, research challenges and possible future work for these four areas. Moreover, the advantages and limitation of new proposed 5G and beyond RON architecture are also reviewed. It is expected that the readers of this study will understand different EE solutions to achieve an optimal EE network.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The current demands for high data rates by mobile users are steering the reinvention of newer technologies to progress 3GPP access networks [1]. Several researchers and mobile operators are working with the 3GPP to achieve higher throughput with greater user capacity [2]. The next-generation mobile network will be stated as 5G and expected to overcome the previous generation's limitation [3, 4]. The predicted data rate for the 5G network is around 100 Gbps with a minimum of 1 ms latency and better user capacity and battery life [5, 6]. In order to achieve the acceptable quality of service (QoS), various potential solutions are in progress, such as the use of millimeter-wave (mm-wave) frequency band [7,8,9,10], massive multiple-input and multiple-output (M-MIMO) [11], Cooperative network using relay nodes (RN) [12], coordinated multipoint (CoMP) [13], wireless software defines networking (WSDN), device-to-device (D2D) communication [14], internet of things (IoT) [15, 16], ethernet passive optical network (EPON) [17], mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) [18, 19], cognitive radio [20], big data and mobile cloud computing (BDMCC) [21]. It also uses several power optimizations [22, 23], routing approaches [24,25,26], spectrum management [27], scheduling algorithms [28], and energy management schemes [29] in the existing technology. In recent times, energy management has become one of the major pillars in the design, implementation, and operation of wireless and cellular communication networks [30]. Unlike cellular networks operated several decades ago, which were designed to optimize specific key performance parameters such as offered capacity, delay, and throughput [30]. However, the focus has been shifted towards the emergence of EE as additional key performance indicator, owing to the development of smart devices and the massive proliferation of data- and energy-hungry applications that have continue to escalate progressively during the last decade. With these in mind, EE is thus considered a prominent figure of merit in the implementation of the next generation 5G (and beyond) wireless systems [31].
Indeed, 5G networks will provide ubiquitous internet and cellular services to cater to the more than fifty billion devices forecasted to be internet-enabled by the end of 2020 [32], including the human-type and machine-type communication systems. Indeed, to be able to provide wireless services to such an unprecedented number of intelligent nodes implies that the next generations wireless networks will inevitably incur the high cost of energy operation, and thus, we must be aware of the offered energy capacity relative to the current standards in order to be able to brace for the future demands [24]. It is doubtful that the 5G EE expectations can be realized relying on existing network architecture setups. This will undoubtedly result in a massive energy crisis and significantly raise operation cost and the issue of environmental safety. This is due to the high emission of Carbon dioxide (CO2) as we have mentioned earlier, existing systems are set up to achieve optimal capacity by merely increasing the transmit power [33]. Considering the predicted magnitude of future wireless networks, the option of scaling the transmit power in order to achieve a capacity boost will be unsustainable [34]. Meanwhile, current wireless systems still depend heavily on the traditional carbon-based energy sources, which still sustains the emphasized concerns [35,36,37].
To fulfill the high demands for EE and data capacity, researchers are now paying closer attention to C-RANs as a prominent candidate technology to 5G networks [38]. C-RAN architecture is a cellular system consisting of a chain of remote radio heads (RRHs) and a pool of centralized baseband processing units (BBU) (see Fig. 1). The BBU pool handles complex baseband signal processing and playing other upper layer roles, while the RRHs only perform basic functionalities related to radiofrequency (RF) such as transmission and receptions of the RF [39]. Connections are established between the RRHs and BBU pool via high-speed fronthaul channels that can either be wired or wireless. The beauty of C-RAN based on RE source is that it improves the cellular networks overall system capacity and boosts the EE [40, 41]. Ultimately, 5G based HetNet based on cloud radio network (H-C-RAN) will incorporate numerous evolutionary technologies such mm-wave, F/SBSs, BS-sleep/wake, RE, etc., to genuinely satisfies and attains the optimal EE requirement of future networks [36]. However, due to the instability of RE power sources, only low-power profile BSs such as SBSs and wireless access points (APs) can at this present time be sufficiently powered using RE in practical networks [42, 43]. The RE powered H-C-RAN architecture, where the primary network equipment draws power from distributed green energy sources connected through the smart grid is now a popular paradigm that presently is being researched by industries and academia [44]. Strategic optimization of RE cellular networks has shown that SBS can consume much less power by using the above approaches [45] with H-C-RAN architecture powered only by grid power supply can equally be EE [46].
The transition to 5G mobile communication systems is being shaped by the unprecedented demand for EE and large system capacity, fueled by the envisaged massive number of intelligent nodes that will dominate the internet arena in the near future coupled with the service complexity of the future wireless networks. The summary of this work’s contribution is as follows.
-
This paper reviews the challenges and requirements of the next-generation wireless networks, namely, 5G and beyond, from energy management perspectives.
-
This survey focuses on four critical EE solutions for future wireless systems: EE resource allocation, network planning, renewable energy, and C-RAN.
-
It discusses various related work, research challenges and possible future work related to EE resource allocation, network planning, renewable energy, and C-RAN.
-
It also proposes a 5G and beyond EE architecture powered by RE energy source and grid energy source while relying on key emerging complementary technologies such as F/SBS, massive MIMO, mm-waves communication, D2D communication, high speed optical fronthaul links, BS sleep/wake, H-C-RAN, and CoMP interference control scheme.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: In Sect. 2, the motivation of this about energy management issues in 5G has been presented. Section 3 discusses the energy-efficient resource allocation approaches, including the recent related works, summary, and future work. Section 4 gives extensive reviews of network planning, including network densification along with some recent works, and then suggests a way forward for future works. In Sect. 5, the discussion related to renewable energy is presented, followed by analyzing related works, summary and suggestions for future work. Section 6 presents a cloud-radio access network with some recent works and summary along with future work. Section 7 gives the various research challenges and proposed 5G and beyond Radio-Optical Communication Networks (RON) architecture along with its challenges and future direction. Finally, the conclusion is shown in Sect. 8. The taxonomy of this survey is presented in Fig. 2 and “Appendix” shows the list of Acronyms presents in this study.
2 Motivation
As one of the essential requirements for 5G, it is said that the energy/power consumption will decrease on the order of magnitude to be able to sustain the power requirements for the envisaged upcoming huge mobile data transactions [47]. To achieve this with the existing wireless systems structure is extremely challenging if not impossible [48, 49]. Moreover, presently, every wireless network operator worldwide focuses mainly on minimizing CO2 emissions by reducing the rate of power transmission of the BSs. Fortunately, recent years have seen a dramatic surge in research interests in the area of EE wireless communications, which have been reported in a growing body of publications and in recent conferences, described as “green communications” [50]. The European Union Seventh Framework Program (EU FP7) EARTH aims to decrease the energy consumption and electromagnetic emission of the BSs by 50% based on the current framework. Apart from the issue of environmental safety, it is also not economical, from an operation’s point of view, to continuously increase the energy consumption of communication systems. Moreover, due to the fast-growing network density, the largest portion of the energy is being consumed by the access network, i.e., at the edge [51]. To achieve a meaningful power reduction in the future wireless networks, researchers are recently paying considerable attention to the following areas (1) Energy Efficient (EE) Resource location, (2) Network planning, (3) Renewable Energy, and (4) Cloud-Radio Access Network. Each of these will be discussed in greater detail in the subsequent sections under the respective mentioned topic. All the emerging technologies and techniques used for resolving the energy management issue are well discussed in this paper's subsequent sections. To the best of the author’s knowledge, no such comprehensive study is available in the literature focusing on these four-research areas concerning energy management issues. The detailed discussion about numerous approaches can help the reader to understand the available enabling technologies in a manner that allows them to work seamlessly together to achieve the expected results for the EE 5G and beyond network.
3 Energy efficient (EE) resource allocation
With the advent of various smart devices and the wide range of high-speed business applications, mobile data traffic is growing exponentially [52]. Efficient energy resource allocation models for future wireless systems have been in increasing demand, and to meet the EE and data capacity requirements of the future wireless networks, many more EE resource allocation schemes with different energy management mechanisms have continued to emerge [53]. In the same vein, various network design scenarios, such as ones incorporating radio over fiber and C-RANs, enabled with low-power nodes (LPNs) such as SBSs, ground remote radio heads (GRRH) and other emerging 5G technologies (as shown in Fig. 3) [54]. They are being proposed and studied to understand how energy resource allocation in future 5G HetNets could be efficiently managed and economically achieved. Cloud computing, a subset of software-defined wireless communication networks, can offer high data rates at a low energy cost [55].
3.1 Related work
Efficient energy resource allocation models have been widely researched in the literature [56]. It demonstrates that a large amount of energy can be saved by slightly reducing the data rates and designing energy-aware coordinated beamforming for HetNets [57]. In [58, 59], the authors experimented with EE models that use energy harvested from visible light, also known as solar energy, to power a wireless system. The authors in [60] studied EE resource allocation that uses a harvesting transmitter based on the thermoelectric energy source, which was found to possess the benefits of long life. However, the major drawback of the thermoelectric energy devices is that they have a low energy conversion efficiency. The resource allocation mechanism based on green EH systems faces numerous challenges because of the randomness in the energy packets collected from the surrounding environment. In [61], the authors considered the uplink of the hybrid HetNet overlaid by macrocell BSs, and then proposes a two-layer game-theoretic framework to achieve EE and increase the usage of network resources. The proposed outer layer allows each small cell access point (SCAP) to achieve a maximum data rate usage by opting for the frequency band ranging between sub-6 GHz and frequency in the mm-wave bands. An optimal transmission structure that aims to increase the overall capacity of time division multiple access systems by load-balancing the spectrum resource among the RRHs and MBSs was proposed in [62]. It achieves optimal resource utilization on attributes such as energy distribution, fairness, waiting time, processing time and throughput among the servers, BSs and machines [63]. In [64], a power allocation algorithm is known as water-filling factors aided search for EE optimization of Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM)-based cognitive RAN. It was proposed and experimented with in the areas of total power constraint, interference power constraint, and capacity constraint [65].
To obtain a maximum EE with minimum sum-rate requirements, less interference, and transmit power constraints, a joint spectrum and power allocation algorithm based on bisection search and fast barrier methods were proposed in [66, 67]. Although the minimum sum-rate requirement and minimum rate requirement for all users and each user were considered in [66] and [67], they do not consider scheduling since they assumed the investigated problems were feasible. In [68], some network elements’ EE was exploited to the maximum, using channel optimization and power allocation based on the stable matching and Hungarian algorithm. Authors of [69] formulated the EE resource allocation problem as a Stackelberg game and applied a gradient-based iteration algorithm to solve it. However, both [68] and [69] did not consider the network elements' QoS. In [70], an auction-based EE resource allocation tradeoff technique for vehicular HetNets was proposed. Similarly, in [71] and [72], EE-RA joint scheme integrated with D2D communications was studied using cooperative relaying and EH setup. A similar method was also proposed in [55] for H-C-RAN networks.
Furthermore, the authors of [73] studied RA policies that optimize the proportional fairness (PF) efficiency in mm-wave massive MIMO. This scheme focuses only on SE and user fairness but ignores the EE. Joint SE-EE user relation was investigated in [74] for small cell based mm-wave networks. On the other hand, the authors of [70] considered distributed antenna system (DAS) and compared cochannel resource allocation schemes for EE communication. In [71], the authors studied a single-cell HetNet having one macro and one picocell for efficient resource allocation such that the EE is maximized by proposing an iterative resource allocation algorithm. However, the same authors did not consider multicellular network for the evaluation.
4 Summary
EE resource utilization is one of the bedrock of future wireless communication systems. To achieve any meaningful power consumption minimization and interference reduction in the future generation of wireless networks, an evolution of wireless network architectures that integrates new EE resource allocation management. Like, SBSs based on BSs on–off strategy, new EE physical layer design for 5G, network virtualization such as cloud computing and C-RAN, and supports for advanced signal processing and networking technologies, are seen as the dominant network architecture of the 5G cellular networks [75]. This section of the paper has thoroughly reviewed several mechanisms and enumerated possible schemes to achieve power-efficient resource allocation goals. It supports equitable energy-spectrum resource sharing among network elements (servers, SBSs, RRHs, MBSs, etc.) in future 5G wireless networks. Table 1 presents a summary of additional related work focusing on energy resource allocations.
4.1 Future work for energy-efficient (EE) resource allocation
The idea of energy transfer over the network seems impressive. Future works should be directed towards efficient EH techniques that are capable of both extracting and transferring renewable energies, including energy from the radio signal, from one BS to another to save the day in the event of partial traffic. The process of extracting energy from the radio signals enables the recycling and utilization of energy, otherwise would have been wasted. This way, interfering signals become a natural source of electromagnetic-based energy to power the future wireless networks.
5 Network planning
In recent years, wireless networks have become more ubiquitous and have been integrated into our everyday life, thereby promoting the need to rework the existing systems. Network planning remains one of the effectively-researched areas in recent times, driven by the fact that existing network architectures require a serious upgrade on the energy and spectrum efficiencies to the upcoming 5G and beyond wireless networks [86]. Current wireless network architectures were traditionally designed with coverage and mobility in mind while not consider EE [87]. To minimize the amount of consumed energy, novel network architectures that consider the spectrum efficiency (SE) and the EE are highly on demand. Cloud computing, an emerging technology with the ability to offer high data rates at a lower energy cost, has formed an integral part of next-generation network planning, design, and implementation. In order to realize the maximum EE, several potential technologies have been proposed for the planning, deployment, and operation of 5G networks [88].
5.1 Network densification
Network densification aims to contain many devices that will be internet-enabled by increasing the sheer number of deployed infrastructure equipment. Two main kinds of network densification are presently gaining more recognition and are considered strong candidates for the deployment of 5G networks.
(1) Dense HetNets: Unlike existing network designs that uniformly sectorize a macro-cell into a few numbers of sectors all covered by a single MBS, dense HetNet involves a large-scale deployment of low power profile infrastructure nodes per unit of the area [89]. A very large number of varying sizes of BSs ranging from MBSs to FBSs or femtocells and relay nodes are deployed opportunistically and activated based on demand, thus leading to a haphazardly shaped network arrangement such as that shown in Fig. 4(a) and (b) [84].
Certainly, low-powered SBSs, which are subsets of the larger HetNet, can be deployed in hot traffic zones to boost capacity and help circumvent most bottleneck design issues associated with traditional MBS deployments [90]. Although the dense deployment of SCNs can help address the traffic and energy demands of the future wireless networks, effective but low complex techniques that monitor each BS's operation states and traffic conditions dynamically place them into sleep or awake mode [91]. It makes it relevant for random cell locations, especially with dynamically changing user distributions and varying spatial and traffic loads so that more energy could be saved, provided the QoS of users such as access delay is not compromised. This approach will result in the low cost of energy operation for the overall network and significant energy savings for delay-tolerant network traffic [92, 93]. Active BSs both consume power and increase interference in the communication environment. Ultimately, a strategic EE network planning that incorporates the scheme for monitoring and controlling the number of active BSs [94] by integrating the design of adaptive BS wake/sleep schemes for energy savings is expected to be widely adopted in future wireless networks [95, 96]. Furthermore, the deployment of 5G networks will involve installing new BSs equipment that supports a variety of services since 5G is projected to become a prevailing General Purpose Technology that will generate trillions of dollars in the global economy [97]. In order to reduce management overhead, the HetNet based small BSs will be equipped with new Radio Access Technologies (RATs) [2] enabled with the softwarization of network functions [98] that increase the network capacity and operational EE of the evolving wireless systems [99].
(2) Massive MIMO If the goal of network densification is to increase the number of deployed SBS infrastructures, the purpose of massive MIMO becomes to increase the number of deployed antenna elements. Traditional massive MIMO consists of arrays with only a few antenna elements fed by bulky and expensive hardware. Massive MIMO for next-generation wireless systems comprises arrays with hundreds of small antenna elements provided by low-cost amplifiers and circuitry. The research interest in massive MIMO technology was prompted by work done in [100], which observed how large antenna arrays could average out multi-user interference due to the law of large numbers. However, the challenges faced by massive MIMO systems are; first, deploying large-scale antenna elements shows that enormous MIMO is an extensive system, usually too complicated for a microscopic analysis [101].
5.2 Related work
Recently, there has been a growing body of literature that deal with different issues in the designs of EE SCN, suggesting that network energy resources can be significantly maximized by implementing EE sleep/wake techniques. This makes a BS into a sleep mode based on short-term service demand with flexible access strategies for end-users. Thus, a tangible amount of energy can be saved in a network designed to meet the peak-hour traffic by (periodically) turning off the BSs. It happens when they are not serving any active users or only, during periods of low traffic while transferring responsibility to the MBS that overlaid the muted SBS [102]. This is by no small means part of key design factors to be taken into consideration during the network planning and design phase. In some cases, the geographical area is split into multiple grids, according to the authors of [103]. Several SBSs plenty enough to serve all users at peak traffic hours selected for each grid area. During idle periods, a subset of the selected SBSs is placed in an active mode while the remaining BSs are turned into sleep mode. This approach achieves up to 53% energy consumption minimization in densely deployed areas and up to 23% in sparsely deployed areas. Authors of [104] have employed the reinforcement learning mechanism to dynamically place under-loaded SBSs into sleep mode while concurrently satisfying the QoS requirements. The problem associated with controlling numerous sets of APs where each AP serves one user equipment (UE) so that the most significant number of UEs experience the maximum service quality [105]. Each UE is assumed to have access to multiple cells and can switch between multiple paths during its service period. The preference for the number of accessible cells over near-by cells is an open research paradigm that is yet to be investigated appropriately.
The authors in [106] consider power control and cell cooperation EE and cell zooming algorithm that provides EE to cellular network operation by comparing the channel models. EE decode-and-forward (DF) relay-assisted network with EH and power-grid BS scheme based on sleep/wake technique is investigated in [107, 108]. Considerable research efforts have been made in the area of delay tolerant networks in the literature [109]. The EE SCNs have not been explored in detail to ascertain the actual energy-saving performance of a given network and the consequence of latency for certain delay-sensitive users when specific small cells are placed into sleep mode. For the implementation of EE-SCNS, the authors of [110] focus on cross-layer optimization of 5G and beyond RONs where network planning and execution are based on centralized C-RAN infrastructures. It establishes the optical backhaul connectivity between RRHs and centralized BBUs pools located in the cloud to facilitate the realization of radio signal processing functions and provide high data rate and low latency transmission required by 5G services in the access network.
6 Summary
Of course, a good measure of energy can be saved by deploying SBSs based on the adaptive sleep/wake techniques that adequately considers users’ QoS experiences. In this section, several other complementary technologies and methods to facilitate the design, deployment and realization of 5G networks have been discussed, including network densification [111]. The EMF constraints may impact 5G planning, and taking this factor into account in the early stage of planning is a step in the right direction as this directly affects the operators’ CAPEX and 5G capacity to support many upcoming state-of-the-art services [112]. Table 2 shows other related work done on network planning and deployment in 5G communication networks.
6.1 Future work for network planning
The huge amount of data activities initiated by various intelligent devices and other high-speed business applications calls for a holistic redesign of existing network architectures. The future network design aims to develop a unique form of an architectural model that proves EE and effectively handles such bandwidth-intensive applications in future wireless networks. Based on this paper's extensive review, we advocate using HetNets, built around optical fiber technology, grid and renewable-energy-powered SBSs, mm-wave and C-RAN technologies. The MBS is connected with the BBU pool via Backhaul, whereas various GRRH are associated with the BBU pool via Fronthaul. Not only will this minimize network power consumption, but it will also enhance the network capacity of connected devices. Meanwhile, enormous works still need to be done to tackle interference issues associated with H-C-RAN networks caused by inter and intra tier signals interfering with one another. Thus, further work on the design of EE 5G-based HetNets should focus more on the above-highlighted challenges.
7 Renewable energy (RE)
The massive increase in the population of SCNs is expected to solve the bulk of issues related to EE, high capacity and enhanced reliability in the future 5G wireless networks. However, these benefits seem to diminish when considering the high energy consumption cost at those numerous BSs (MBSs and SBSs alike), which translates to more CO2 emissions into the human ecosystem [123]. Cellular operators are now paying closer attention to develop RE technologies to power the BSs in addition to the grid power source. In this new arrangement, the grid energy source will play backup support to ensure uninterrupted service to the users if eventually, the RE source becomes unavailable or insufficient [124]. Another huge leap in energy-saving is the recent development of BSs that RE sources can power through solar systems [125]. This type of technology is needed not only in developed countries but urgently and badly needed in developing countries where reliable and ubiquitous power grids are mostly absent. It is also more interesting as it allows “drop and play” rather than “plug and play” for SBSs and SCNs deployment in the presence of wireless backhaul. However, due to the fluctuating nature of RE source, the energy harvested by BSs may not be enough to support their load conditions. As a result, the transmit power of the BSs for the emerging wireless networks needs to be further redesigned.
Power control in mm-wave networks using grid-RE cooperation mechanism can be a great way to solve the energy imbalances as well as minimize the energy waste by solely powering each BS through RE source. This is done by backing up the same BS by an alternative grid power source, and the harvested energy can also be stored up and transferred from one BS to another (see Figs. 5, 6). This way, each BS needs to determine whether the energy should be stored in the battery or transferred to another BS at any given time slot [126]. Researchers have tried several power optimization approaches, including formulating power control as a stochastic optimization problem, to maximize the time average network utilization efficiency while keeping the network stable. An online algorithm called dynamic energy-aware power allocation (DEPA) is based on the Lyapunov optimization approach. Technically speaking, power control schemes with energy cooperation can achieve a higher network sum rate and reduce the delay and the required battery capacity [127].
7.1 Related work
The necessity to develop and implement communication systems powered solely by REsources, also known as green communication, has elicited numerous research efforts from various groups and industrial assemblies worldwide [128, 129]. The shift on 5G technology will most likely spur a disproportionate paradigm shift on the invention of innovative techniques for network deployment. It integrates renewable and grid energy optimization, efficient resource allocation, and smart BSs programmed for efficient sleep/wake control to achieve super EE optimization in the emerging wireless networks.
Numerous studies have focused on improving the network EE by way of minimizing the cost of system operation through the transmit power minimization of the BSs powered by grid energy source and applying the concept of traffic shaping based on green energy management [130,131,132]. Authors in [133] investigated the feasibility of integrating hybrid energy sources in the proposed scheme to produce multi-cell green cooperation. In [134], an optimization problem for minimizing the BS transmit power over the network is presented. The proposed scheme focused on enhancing transmission reliability, information security, and EH to reach an optimal solution. In [135,136,137] optimized user association and green power allocation algorithms are adopted to minimize the grid energy consumption, and in [138], an efficient resource allocation based on the hybrid power system was introduced to minimize grid energy consumption, considering battery leakage constraint. Optimal grid EE and achievable QoS were gained using Lyapunov power control and BS assignment algorithm [139], and a game theory strategy has experimented for cooperative energy to reduce grid energy consumption in SCN [140]. In [141], the BS muting technique is used to achieve optimal performance in grid energy consumption as well as maximize capacity in a cellular system that uses EH mechanism. Adaptive user association was applied to achieve maximum system capacity in EH aided system and optimal EE was achieved by power-sharing control among the BSs in a HetNet using hybrid energy sources.
Moreover, in [142], a technique known as “first harvest-then-transmit” was used to attain optimal EE on a user level and maximize the system’s throughput of the harvested energy. Simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) are experimented in [143] with cloud radio access cellular networks that gathered energy from a six frequency-band system that in allowed devices to harvest sufficient energy from RF, thus improving the total EE throughput of the cloud-based radio access cellular network. In [144] massive MIMO technique was applied to EH scheme based on a heuristic algorithm to achieve optimal EE and the capacity boost in SCNs. However, the bulk of these works center on transmission policies enhancement, capacity and power allocations optimization for end-users [134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141], and front-haul links [135,136,137,138,139]. Earlier works which focused more on the point-to-point link [140,141,142], and broadcast link [145, 146], had used a hybridization of renewable and non-RE sources combined to build an energy structure that supplies the required amount of energy for access network communication from the renewable source, while the non-RE source serves as a backup to the RE source to maintain users acceptable QoS in the event the renewable source becomes insufficient. The idea of creating hybrid energy sources sounds rewarding since it ensures that access BSs will provide guaranteed and uninterruptible connectivity.
8 Summary
RE is now more than ever, a hot topic in the power management of wireless communication systems due to the conflict between the booming traffic demand and the limited energy resources. In this section of the paper, an exhaustive list of algorithms for harvesting and harnessing the RE that can be extracted from readily available resources such as wind, sun, hydro dams, and RF for future cellular networks has been outlined [147, 148]. Operating a wireless communication system through RE can be indeed a highly appreciated alternative as it presents a green communication paradigm. Despite the enormous economic and environmental benefits, RE sources still faced the challenges of its usage—on the transceiver strategies' design. The transceiver strategies of existing renewable EH systems must be redesigned and adapted for the intermittent nature that characterizes RE resources. Table 3 shows other related work done on the green/renewable/grid energy planning and deployment in 5G communication networks.
8.1 Future work and recommendations for renewable energy
The idea of extracting green energy from readily available RE sources such as wind, sun, hydro dams, and RF presents cellular network operators with a unique opportunity to properly manage the power crisis issues. RE technologies are particularly more beneficial to those in countries with no advanced or dependable electrical grids. Before considering the option of RE solution, feasibility studies must be done to identify those technologies capable of generating the amount of energy sufficiently enough to power the BSs. Moreover, network operators' operational and economic costs should also be carefully considered by network operators before deciding on a suitable implementation. Likewise, the site where the RE facilities such as the RE-powered BSs will be situated should be considered to prevent any unforeseeable disruption caused by dirt, dust, tree debris, moss, sap, water spots, and mold, etc. EE cellular networks based on green energy remain a broad research topic facing several issues that are yet to be adequately addressed; some of these issues have been discussing in this paper. Cellular network operators must shift toward green-powered network alternatives to reduce operational expenditures and minimize environmental damage.
9 Cloud-radio access network (C-RAN)
Nowadays, Cloud technologies and services are becoming very popular due to the extended usage advantages they offer, which include accessibility, high speed, security, storage, processing speed, etc. [159, 160]. However, cloud resources' prominent drawback centers around the energy cost for operating specific cloud communication components and cloud-based network devices. The examples are servers and storage devices as well as power required for cooling the IT loads, all of which contribute to high operational cost and increased emission of carbon into the human territory. Thus, cloud service providers and cloud operators need to look towards green cloud technology as an alternative to the existing cloud schemes to introduce a green cloud environment that will cut down on the operational cost of energy and reduce the environmental impact of carbon emission [161]. RAN based on cloud technology, also referred to as C-RAN, is designed to handle the issue of high capacity demands for future wireless networks since the cloud is inherently structured to offer high SE and minimize access delay for delay-sensitive applications. The EH architecture for C-RAN will be different from that of the traditional cellular networks [162]. The C-RAN architecture split the functions of conventional BS into BBUs and distributed RRHs [163]. The BBU pools are deployed in the centralized cloud data center for controlling, baseband signal processing, and data processing. In contrast, the RRHs are connected to the BBU pools through high-speed backhaul links. The RRHs perform RF-related functions such as decompressing the received signals from the BBUs and transmitting them to UEs. From the EE point of view, the dense deployment of RRHs equates to an avenue for more energy consumption, which translates to high emissions of carbon dioxide. To address this, it is imperative to develop EH schemes that equip the RRHs with the ability to autonomously harvest RE from solar and wind energy sources [164]. Thus, RRHs powered by RE will be highly instrumental in realizing the much-desired environment-friendly green cellular communications. To sufficiently support delay-intolerant applications, C-RAN will require highly optimized resource management algorithms that are both efficient and scalable considering the large number of RRHs and BBUs that a potential C-RAN (see Fig. 7). Furthermore, the performance of C-RAN network can be optimized by integrating a particular emerging complementary concept, as explained below.
(1) Centralized baseband processing Energy economization is one of the key features that make C-RAN an attractive architecture for future wireless network deployment. C-RAN will save more energy since it centralizes the backend baseband processing units in the cloud, which is more EE [165], especially if the recent progress in green data centers are exploited efficiently [166].
(2) Small cells approach One of the significant options [167] and an effective technique to achieve substantial energy saving in a C-RAN setting is via adopting a small cell deployment option. Likewise, the mm-wave will be of significant importance for offloading data locally in C-RAN networks given the unprecedented amount of available bandwidths in the higher frequency space, also stated as mm-wave [168]. For example, the VLC uses only the mm-wave frequency bands for data communication. The energy consumption per unit bulb for transmitting high-density data in the VLC paradigm is much less than that consumed by its RF-based counterpart for sharing the same amount of data [169].
(3) H-C-RAN The concept of HetNet, has been well-known and has been practiced within the wireless network industry over the last couple of decades because it has remained a viable option for maximizing the throughput and the efficiency of various network resources, including energy. H-C-RAN-based SCNs that encompass SBSs, mm-wave, VLC, etc., remain a good architecture to provide a massive SE and zero access delay and high throughput at a low cost of energy in the future wireless networks. H-C-RAN based mm-wave architecture that was suggested for 5G cellular networks in [170] is a C-RAN concept built on the architecture of the HetNet using SCNs and mm-wave frequency bands to offload data locally in the access network [171]. In this type of network architecture, SCNs are created within macrocells to allow mm-wave application within the small cells using the VLC and other mm-wave oriented RATs to connect to edge user devices with enhanced QoS experiences [172].
(4) Interference issue One of the well-known challenges in HetNet remains the issue of severe interference [173]. This is merely owing to the densely deployed BSs that characterized the HetNet networks. H-C-RANs, which have emerged as promising architecture in recent years improve the performance of MBSs using SBSs and cloud-based signal processing mechanisms. It is also known as BBU pools interconnected via high-speed optical fibers, which had inherited the interference challenge from the HetNet [174]. Fortunately, the same set of schemes, such as inter-cell interference coordination (ICIC) and coordinated multiple points (CoMP) transmission and reception that were used to handle the interference issues in HetNet, can also be applied in H-C-RAN paradigm [175]. H-C-RANs scenario enables easy implementation of the ICIC [176]. The ICIC rates are very high among other key schemes employed for improving the interference performance of H-C-RANs [177]. However, the application of these great interference controlling schemes in modern cellular and wireless networks is still limited due to their heavy reliance on the backhaul connections and cellular networks' computation resources [178].
9.1 Related work
Most existing C-RAN works focus mainly on the spectrum performance optimization, while fewer mentions have been made of the EE allocation mechanisms [179,180,181,182]. In [179] the EE for the wireless downlink in H-C-RAN was investigated and analyzed. In [180], Zhang et al. studied the resource allocation scheme in green H-C-RAN with a hybrid energy source. Authors of [181] dissected the EE guaranteed trade-off between offered capacity and delay in H-C-RAN [182]. In [183], a design of EE resource allocation algorithm based on joint channel selection and power allocation for H-C-RAN was proposed. However, the above scheme did not consider the randomness in the EH processes but only focused on optimal EE, and as a result, they cannot be applied in C-RAN based EH setting, abbreviated as EH-C-RAN. Although the delay is an essential parameter for measuring the QoS in wireless networks, the proposed solutions in [184] did not provide a guaranteed delay bound to evaluate the QoS requirements. To address this, the authors in [185] proposed a resource allocation scheme with dynamic EH policies based on stochastic channel state to provide a guaranteed delay bound for delay-aware applications and services. In [186], the authors also studied guaranteed EE problems with throughput and delayed tradeoff in a noninterference C-RAN network. It is based on an integrated Lyapunov optimization structure, then an enhanced downlink transmission CoMP technique for C-RANs with optimal fronthaul channels for delay-aware traffic was proposed. In [187], delay-sensitive cooperative beamforming management for delay-aware services with restricted fronthaul data transmission in C-RANs was proposed. In [188], the authors considered a data decision-based transmission technique that considers the delay-awareness and data health history of sensor devices in opportunistic systems. Authors of [189] and [190] proposed a dynamic power and sub-band allocations scheme to achieve optimal Pareto power-delay tradeoff in the OFDMA system. Also, in [191], a theoretical structure was proposed to evaluate the tradeoff between power and delay in an unstable OFDMA system with a time-varying channel state information transmitter (CSIT). As a matter of fact, these kinds of solutions do not satisfy the delay-sensitive application's requirements in future C-RAN networks.
On the other hand, energy resource optimization is now one of the most important performance metrics of the H-C-RANs networks. Currently, it introduces a new paradigm in the energy management of wireless communication systems due to the sharp increase in the CO2 release and high operation cost of energy of wireless networks [192]. The power allocation technique to address EE and SE's tradeoff in the downlink of end-users devices was studied in [193] using a DAS having proportional rate limits. In [194], the authors consider multi-dimensional resource optimization that jointly encompasses power allocation, beamforming optimization, and resource block assignment further to investigate EE and SE's tradeoff in H-C-RAN networks. The EE-SE tradeoff for D2D communications was also studied in relay-assisted cellular systems [186,187,188]. However, many kinds of literature mentioned in the above studies mainly focused on full-buffered theories and are typically based on snapshot models that do not consider the stochastic and time-changing natures of traffic arrival in the formulations of their problems. Thus, optimization becomes only achievable in the physical layer performance metrics such as SE and EE, whereas the resulting control scheme can only be adapted to channel state information (CSI) [195].
10 Summary
C-RANs have been massively favored by academia and industries alike as a robust setup fit enough to deliver on the key performance requirements, namely, offered capacity, EE, and delay bound for future wireless networks. Indeed, H-C-RAN is a promising architecture most likely to be sustained for future wireless systems [196]. However, the advantages of H-C-RANs are still being impeded by high interference factors and this must be addressed adequately before the potentials of H-C-RANs will be fully unleashed. H-C-RAN is often discussed as a cost-effective architecture that can restrain interference, increase network throughput and enhance cooperative processing gains in future 5G HetNet [197]. Other enabling technologies such as heterogeneity in C-RAN networks, C-RAN network planning, and interference control in H-C-RAN using ICIC and CoMP schemes were also discussed in this section. The complementary techniques mentioned above can ultimately help H-C-RAN to achieve the main goals. Significantly, the number of physically deployed BSs can be reduced in C-RAN configuration as a result of BBU aggregation in the cloud, which implies a much lower cost of operation. Below is Table 4, which shows a summary of additional review to the related work done in the area of C-RAN and H-C-RAN.
10.1 Future work for cloud-radio access network (C-RAN)
C-RAN deployment faces multiple levels of challenges which range from (i) installation of BBUs to effectively utilize the processing resource, (ii) establishing proper connections between the BBU and RRH interfaces using high-speed fronthaul links, and (iii) setting up an optimal mechanism for centralized control of the propagation of signals. In addition, C-RAN performance still suffers a huge drawback as a result of the use of fronthaul links that have limited capacity and BBUs with limited processing power. To achieve C-RAN full potentials of techniques, future research should concentrate on schemes that aim to address the challenges mentioned above. Particularly, techniques that target to optimize the network throughput and reduce scheduling complexity in C-RAN networks should be further explored by any interested group. Future work should thus be directed at developing fronthaul-sensitive resource allocation schemes that will achieve optimum EE by signal compression/quantization, beamforming techniques, and includes on/off switching at the RRHs [208,209,210].
11 Research challenges and proposed architecture
Various EE resource allocation schemes, including those equipped with the ability to extract RE from energy sources working on various EH mechanisms and the grid energy source working in conjunction with different network designs. It also focuses on incorporating RON, C-RANs, and a host of other 5G complementary technologies in a heterogeneous manner, which have been extensively reviewed in this paper. Even though many energy management techniques discussed in this issue have been said to possess the capacity to significantly support the overall energy requirements of the future wireless systems, adopting these wide ranges of new use cases requires flexibility. Moreover, the impact of these new technologies on EE for 5G operation is yet to be precisely ascertained and quantified. New energy consumption models that consider the energy consumption that is associated with the uplink and downlink transmissions in the network are required. To this effect, the research forums and industrial organizations wishing to contribute to the future development and improvement of the EE and SE for 5G systems.
Recently, user communication devices are being furnished with multiple radio RATs – e.g., cellular, Bluetooth, WiFi, so they can easily connect to any available connection technologies (e.g., as is always the case in indoor scenarios) [211]. This simplifies the cellular traffic offloading process and makes it easy for additional cellular resources to be provided to users unable to offload their traffic, eventually making network energy efficient. Various EE approaches are stated in the literature, which has critical research challenges that need attention from the research community.
11.1 Device-to-device (D2D) communications
While user devices that are co-located do not directly establish communication between or among themselves in conventional networks. D2D communication refers to a setup where several co-located devices or devices that are in close communication range can directly communicate using a designated cellular frequency and at the prompt of the BS [212]. The power control underlaid D2D approach can be resolved using machine learning approaches [213, 214]. Moreover, D2D schemes will positively impact the system EE given the fact that a direct transmission between nearby devices requires a much lower transmit power than what is necessary for communication via a BS that can be far off from the user devices. Some more powerful offloading techniques are required to allow the release of network resources at the BS to support other users with proper energy management.
11.2 Visible light communications (VLC)
VLC, also known as optical wireless communication (OWC) or LiFi, is a technology that is designed for indoor communication services in the evolving wireless systems. While this technology is typically short-range, it has a very high EE performance and huge available bandwidths; thus, it can support huge data rates [215]. The use of the LiFi frequency for data communication is ultimately accomplished through low-cost and available off-the-shelf light-emitting diodes (LEDs) technique. Therefore, some advanced approaches are needed to especially for indoor communication.
11.3 Local caching
Ideally, wireless networks have unstable traffic loads. During periods of light traffic, the redundant capacity can be leveraged by the network to download and keep in the BS’s cache important network contents that many users for easy retrieval frequently need. Thus, the scheme is named “local caching”. Of course, this technique comes with a trade-off between storage capacity at the BS and network throughput [216]. This implies that the load on the backhaul link reduces inversely proportionally with the increase in content caching; thus, the strategy can potentially boost the EE of the core network by opting not to transmit the same content multiple times to different users. Local caching is an emerging EE offloading scheme that is still unfolding and is currently attracting widespread interest among wireless systems researchers [217].
11.4 Mm-wave communications
The use of communication spectrum above 20 GHz, also called mm-wave, as described in this section as a unique approach to performing EE traffic offloading from the mm-wave spectrum band of below 60 GHz cellular frequencies used for short-distance (from 10 to 200 m) communications in highly congested areas [218]. There are requirements for evolving wireless technologies to take advantage of the massively unutilized mm-wave spectrum to meet the projected data rate demands for future mobile traffic [219]. However, the IEEE 802.15.3c, IEEE 802.11ad (Wi-Gig), Wireless-HD, and ECMA-387 standards, are available range of mm-wave-based solutions which are already represented in IEEE, with more to follow suit in the coming years. Some machine learning approaches can also be adopted to resolve various mmWave communication scenarios, creating an EE network [220, 221].
11.5 Proposed 5G and beyond RON architecture
5G and beyond RON is a unique network design scenario for 5G and beyond (as referred as 6G) that focuses mainly on RONs based on cross-layer optimization. What is unique about a 5G network based on RON architecture (5G and beyond RON) is that the design of a 5G and beyond RON network includes a centralized C-RAN access network with optical backhaul connectivity between RRHs and centralized baseband units (BBUs) [222]. The RON architecture can bring great openings in terms of traffic offload/load balancing, refining link reliability, provisioning of hyper-speed data rate, multi-tier networks, enhancing of spectral utilization, provision for smooth handover, line-of-sight (LOS)/non-line-of-sight (NLOS) communication support, omnidirectional/directional communication support, and downlink (DL)/uplink (UL) support through different networks. This renders a 5G RON highly efficient in providing a very high data rate with low latency communication over the wireless and optical network – via densely deployed RRH antennas operating within a higher spectrum range with plug-and-play support for advanced radio communication technologies such as massive MIMO andbeamforming, at very low energy cost [223, 224].
See Fig. 8 for an example of a 5G and beyond RON network, where RH is radio header and CO is the cloud operating (CO) network device that is installed together. Designing and operating a pervasive 5G and beyond RON that spans different domains requires multi-layered architecture, namely, optical radio and packet layers. Such an architecture requires enough computational capacity and dedicated cross-layer optimization systems that consider the signal qualities of the optical fronthaul radio links of the entire network performance, including user QoS requirements. The process of selecting cell sites for 5G and beyond RON BSs placement has to abide by the standardized downlink electromagnetic fields (EMF) regulatory limits that govern the 5G network planning and deployment [225]. This EMF regulation stipulates the acceptable limits on EMF exposures for current mobile networks. Those are some of the key concerns for operators wishing to upgrade to the 5G and beyond RON mobile network, and it remains yet an open issue till date that has been largely deliberated upon in the recent International Telecommunication Union (ITU) seminars.
Below are some challenges and future directions in order to design 5G and beyond RON.
Network selection An effective network selection technique is essential in the RON network. The network selection criteria are different in RON compared to existing RF based networks because of various sub-networks. Hence, existing network selection technique should be modified to increase the overall capacity and network throughput.
Heterogeneous receiver type Both the receivers for two different networks in RON should be active simultaneously. The characteristics of RF-based receivers and optical-based receivers are different. Hence, this is a challenging task for the hybrid network to design such transmitters and design to maximize the transmission rate.
Handover Handover is an important issue in RON. Appropriate handover decision criteria and algorithms are still open research issues that can reduce the handover and consider the energy efficiency scheme to optimize the battery power of the communication device.
High-capacity backhaul network Another critical concern for RON is to provide a load balancing facility. Hence, a huge amount of overall data throughput in the access network can be increased with minimum end-to-end transmission delay. To support this data throughput, a very high capacity backhaul network is essential that is still an open research issue.
12 Conclusion
Future wireless communication networks will be mostly decentralized and characterized by small cell deployments ranging from 10 to 100 m of radius/cell. Recent studies have shown that BSs account for about 65% to 70% of total network power, implying that future wireless networks will consume way more energy than we presently experience. This is because SCN means a large-scale deployment of BSs everywhere to provide better coverage. This phenomenon makes EE arrangements such a critical issue in the implementation of future wireless networks. This study has provided an overview of several emerging technologies that can be applied to improve 5G cellular networks' EE performance. As we have pointed out in the survey, future wireless networks will comprise various enabling and emerging technologies [24, 226]. However, the biggest challenge remains on integrating the available enabling technologies to allow them to work seamlessly together to achieve the expected results. Some of the open research problems have been outlined and discussed, especially those related to EE resource allocation, network planning, renewable energy, C-RAN, testing, and measurement of new 5G system use cases. Finally, future research on 5G systems should focus on the research challenges highlighted in this paper.
References
Prasad, A. R., Arumugam, S., Sheeba, B., & Zugenmaier, A. (2018). 3GPP 5G security. Journal of ICT Standardization, 6(1), 137–158.
Andrews, J. G., Buzzi, S., Choi, W., Hanly, S. V., Lozano, A., Soong, A. C., & Zhang, J. C. (2014). What will 5G be? IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(6), 1065–1082.
Patel, S., Chauhan, M., & Kapadiya, K. (2012). 5G: Future mobile technology-vision 2020. International Journal of Computer Applications, 54(17), 66.
Qamar, F., Hindia, M. N., Abbas, T., Dimyati, K. B., & Amiri, I. S. (2019). Investigation of QoS performance evaluation over 5G network for indoor environment at millimeter wave bands. International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, 65(1), 95–101.
Weber, S., Andrews, J. G., & Jindal, N. (2010). An overview of the transmission capacity of wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 58(12), 3593–3604.
Talwar, S., Choudhury, D., Dimou, K., Aryafar, E., Bangerter, B., & Stewart, K. (2014). Enabling technologies and architectures for 5G wireless. In 2014 IEEE MTT-S international microwave symposium (IMS) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.
Rappaport, T. S., Sun, S., Mayzus, R., Zhao, H., Azar, Y., Wang, K., Wong, G. N., Schulz, J. K., Samimi, M., & Gutierrez, F. (2013). Millimeter wave mobile communications for 5G cellular: It will work! IEEE Access, 1, 335–349.
Qamar, F., Abbas, T., Hindia, M. N., Dimyati, K. B., Noordin, K. A. B., & Ahmed, I. (2017). Characterization of MIMO propagation channel at 15 GHz for the 5G spectrum. In 2017 IEEE 13th Malaysia international conference on communications (MICC) (pp. 265–270). IEEE.
Abbas, T., Qamar, T., Ahmed, I., Dimyati, K., & Majed, M. B. (2017). Propagation channel characterization for 28 and 73 GHz millimeter-wave 5G frequency band. In 2017 IEEE 15th student conference on research and development (SCOReD) (pp. 297–302). IEEE.
Qamar, F., Siddiqui, M. H. S., Dimyati, K., Noordin, K. A. B., & Majed, M. B. (2017). Channel characterization of 28 and 38 GHz MM-wave frequency band spectrum for the future 5G network. In 2017 IEEE 15th student conference on research and development (SCOReD) (pp. 291–296). IEEE.
Bogale, T. E., & Le, L. B. (2016). Massive MIMO and mmWave for 5G wireless HetNet: Potential benefits and challenges. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 11(1), 64–75.
Hindia, M. N., Qamar, F., Rahman, T. A., & Amiri, I. S. (2018). A stochastic geometrical approach for full-duplex MIMO relaying model of high-density network. Ad Hoc Networks, 74, 34–46.
Qamar, F., Dimyati, K. B., Hindia, M. N., Noordin, K. A. B., & Al-Samman, A. M. (2017). A comprehensive review on coordinated multi-point operation for LTE-A. Computer Networks, 123, 19–37.
Zhang, X., Cheng, W., & Zhang, H. (2014). Heterogeneous statistical QoS provisioning over 5G mobile wireless networks. IEEE Network, 28(6), 46–53.
Elijah, O., Rahman, T. A., Orikumhi, I., Leow, C. Y., & Hindia, M. N. (2018). An overview of internet of things (IoT) and data analytics in agriculture: benefits and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 56, 23.
Hassan, R., Qamar, F., Hasan, M. K., Aman, A. H. M., & Ahmed, A. S. (2020). Internet of things and its applications: A comprehensive survey. Symmetry, 12(10), 1674.
Udeshi, D., & Qamar, F. (2014). Quality analysis of epon network for uplink and downlink design. Asian Journal of Engineering, Sciences & Technology, 4(2), 56.
Tilwari, V., Hindia, M. N., Dimyati, K., Qamar, F., Talip, A., & Sofian, M. (2019). Contention window and residual battery aware multipath routing schemes in mobile ad-hoc networks. International Journal of Technology, 10(7), 1376–1384.
Talukdar, M. I., Hassan, R., Hossen, M. S., Ahmad, K., Qamar, F., & Ahmed, A. S. (2021). Performance improvements of AODV by black hole attack detection using IDS and digital signature. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2021, 66.
Hindia, M. N., Qamar, F., Ojukwu, H., Dimyati, K., Al-Samman, A. M., & Amiri, I. S. (2020). On platform to enable the cognitive radio over 5G networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 113(2), 1241–1262.
Hashem, I. A. T., Yaqoob, I., Anuar, N. B., Mokhtar, S., Gani, A., & Khan, S. U. (2015). The rise of “big data” on cloud computing: Review and open research issues. Information Systems, 47, 98–115.
Gachhadar, A., Hindia, M. N., Qamar, F., Siddiqui, M. H. S., Noordin, K. A., & Amiri, I. S. (2018). Modified genetic algorithm based power allocation scheme for amplify-and-forward cooperative relay network. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 14, 56.
Noordin, K. A. B., Hindia, M. N., Qamar, F., & Dimyati, K. (2018). Power allocation scheme using PSO for amplify and forward cooperative relaying network. In Science and information conference (pp. 636–647). Springer.
Malathy, S., Porkodi, V., Sampathkumar, A., Hindia, M. N., Dimyati, K., Tilwari, V., Qamar, F., & Amiri, I. S. (2020). An optimal network coding based backpressure routing approach for massive IoT network. Wireless Networks, 66, 1–18.
Amiri, I., Dong, D. S., Pokhrel, Y. M., Gachhadar, A., Maharjan, R. K., & Qamar, F. (2019). Resource tuned optimal random network coding for single hop multicast future 5G networks. International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, 65(3), 463–469.
Muniyandi, R. C., Qamar, F., & Jasim, A. N. (2020). Genetic optimized location aided routing protocol for VANET based on rectangular estimation of position. Applied Sciences, 10(17), 5759.
Qamar, F., Siddiqui, M. U. A., Hindia, M., Hassan, R., & Nguyen, Q. N. (2020). Issues, challenges, and research trends in spectrum management: A comprehensive overview and new vision for designing 6G networks. Electronics, 9(9), 1416.
Hindia, M. N., Qamar, F., Majed, M. B., Rahman, T. A., & Amiri, I. S. (2018). Enabling remote-control for the power sub-stations over LTE-A networks. Telecommunication Systems, 33, 1–17.
Nguyen, L. (2018). Resource management for wireless communications: An energy efficiency approach. Queen's University Belfast.
Deb, P., Mukherjee, A., & De, D. (2018). A study of densification management using energy efficient femto-cloud based 5G mobile network. Wireless Personal Communications, 101(4), 2173–2191.
Poirot, V., Ericson, M., Nordberg, M., & Andersson, K. (2020). Energy efficient multi-connectivity algorithms for ultra-dense 5G networks. Wireless Networks, 26(3), 2207–2222.
Ericsson, L. (2011). More than 50 billion connected devices. White Paper, 14, 124.
Zhang, N., Yang, P., Ren, J., Chen, D., Yu, L., & Shen, X. J. I. W. C. (2018). Synergy of big data and 5g wireless networks: Opportunities, approaches, and challenges. IEEE Wireless Communications, 25(1), 12–18.
Abbas, T., Qamar, T., Hindia, M. N., Hassan, R., Ahmed, I., & Aslam, M. I. (2020). Performance analysis of ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing protocol for MANET. In 2020 IEEE student conference on research and development (SCOReD) (pp. 194–199) IEEE.
Fehske, A., Fettweis, G., Malmodin, J., & Biczok, G. (2011). The global footprint of mobile communications: The ecological and economic perspective. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(8), 55–62.
Auer, G., Giannini, V., Desset, C., Godor, I., Skillermark, P., Olsson, M., Imran, M. A., Sabella, D., Gonzalez, M. J., Blume, O., & Fehske, A. (2011). How much energy is needed to run a wireless network? IEEE Wireless Communications, 18(5), 40–49.
Pollex, J., & Lenschow, A. J. (2018). Surrendering to growth? The European Union’s goals for research and technology in the Horizon 2020 framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1863–1871.
Chih-Lin, I., Rowell, C., Han, S., Xu, Z., Li, G., & Pan, Z. (2014). Toward green and soft: A 5G perspective. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(2), 66–73.
Peng, M., Wang, M., Lau, V., & Poor, H. V. (2015). Fronthaul-constrained cloud radio access networks: Insights and challenges, arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.01187, 2015.
Ariffin, W. N. S. F. W., Zhang, X., & Nakhai, M. R. (2015). Real-time energy trading with grid in green cloud-RAN. In 2015 IEEE 26th annual international symposium on personal, indoor, and mobile radio communications (PIMRC) (pp. 748–752). IEEE.
Zhang, D., Chen, Z., Cai, L. X., Zhou, H., Ren, J., & Shen, X. (2016). Resource allocation for green cloud radio access networks powered by renewable energy. In 2016 IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
Ozel, O., Tutuncuoglu, K., Ulukus, S., & Yener, A. (2015). Fundamental limits of energy harvesting communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(4), 126–132.
Piro, G., Miozzo, M., Forte, G., Baldo, N., Grieco, L. A., Boggia, G., & Dini, P. (2012). Hetnets powered by renewable energy sources: Sustainable next-generation cellular networks. IEEE Internet Computing, 17(1), 32–39.
Peng, M., Li, M., Zhao, Z., & Wang, Z. (2014). System architecture and key technologies for 5G heterogeneous cloud radio access networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6677.
Zeng, D., Zhang, J., Guo, S., Gu, L., & Wang, K. (2017). Take renewable energy into CRAN toward green wireless access networks. IEEE Networks, 31(4), 62–68.
Pamuklu, T., & Ersoy, C. (2013). Optimization of renewable green base station deployment. In 2013 IEEE international conference on green computing and communications and IEEE internet of things and IEEE cyber, physical and social computing (pp. 59–63). IEEE.
Aggarwal, R. (2018). Wireless communication: Evolution and advance wireless communication. International Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 4(2), 22–30.
Liu, L., Wang, H., Liu, X., Jin, X., He, W. B., Wang, Q. B., & Chen, Y. (2009). GreenCloud: A new architecture for green data center. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference industry session on Autonomic computing and communications industry session (pp. 29–38).
Chen, S., & Zhao, J. (2014). The requirements, challenges, and technologies for 5G of terrestrial mobile telecommunication. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(5), 36–43.
Xu, J., & Zhang, R. (2014). Throughput optimal policies for energy harvesting wireless transmitters with non-ideal circuit power. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(2), 322–332.
Auer, G., Giannini, V., Desset, C., Godor, I., Skillermark, P., Olsson, M., Imran, M. A., Sabella, D., Gonzalez, M. J., Blume, O., & Fehske, A. (2011). How much energy is needed to run a wireless network? IEEE Wireless Communications, 18(5), 40–49.
Moreno García-Loygorri, J., Briso-Rodríguez, C., Arnedo, I., Calvo, C., Laso, M. A., He, D., Jiménez, F., & González Posadas, V. (2018). Wideband channel modeling for mm-wave inside trains for 5G-related applications. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 7, 42.
Gao, X., Dai, L., Han, S., Chih-Lin, I., & Heath, R. W. (2016). Energy-efficient hybrid analog and digital precoding for mmWave MIMO systems with large antenna arrays. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 34(4), 998–1009.
Tao, X., Xu, X., & Cui, Q. (2012). An overview of cooperative communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(6), 65–71.
Peng, M., Zhang, K., Jiang, J., Wang, J., & Wang, W. (2015). Energy-efficient resource assignment and power allocation in heterogeneous cloud radio access networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 64(11), 5275–5287.
Vullers, R. J. M., Van Schaijk, R., Visser, H. J., Penders, J., & Van Hoof, C. (2010). Energy harvesting for autonomous wireless sensor networks. IEEE Solid-State Circuits Magazine, 2(2), 29–38.
He, S., Huang, Y., Wang, H., Jin, S., & Yang, L. (2014). Leakage-aware energy-efficient beamforming for heterogeneous multicell multiuser systems. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(6), 1268–1281.
Taneja, J., Jeong, J., & Culler, D. (2008). Design, modeling, and capacity planning for micro-solar power sensor networks. In 2008 International conference on information processing in sensor networks (ipsn 2008) (pp. 407–418). IEEE.
Prasad, R. V., Devasenapathy, S., Rao, V. S., & Vazifehdan, J. (2014). Reincarnation in the ambiance: Devices and networks with energy harvesting. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(1), 195–213.
Leonov, V. (2013). Thermoelectric energy harvesting of human body heat for wearable sensors. IEEE Sensors Journal, 13(6), 2284–2291.
C. K. Ho and R. Zhang, "Optimal energy allocation for wireless communications powered by energy harvesters," 2010: IEEE, pp. 2368–2372.
Liu, J., Dai, H., & Chen, W. (2016). On throughput maximization of time division multiple access with energy harvesting users. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(4), 2457–2470.
Ozel, O., Tutuncuoglu, K., Yang, J., Ulukus, S., & Yener, A. (2011). Transmission with energy harvesting nodes in fading wireless channels: Optimal policies. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 29(8), 1732–1743.
Baron, O., Berman, O., Krass, D., & Wang, Q. (2007). The equitable location problem on the plane. European Journal of Operational Research, 183(2), 578–590.
Andrews, J. G., Singh, S., Ye, Q., Lin, X., & Dhillon, H. (2013). An overview of load balancing in HetNets: Old myths and open problems, arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.7779.
Shi, W., & Wang, S. (2013). Energy-efficient resource allocation in cognitive radio systems. In 2013 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC) (pp. 4618–4623). IEEE.
Wang, S., Ge, M., & Zhao, W. (2013). Energy-efficient resource allocation for OFDM-based cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 61(8), 3181–3191.
Lu, L., He, D., Yu, X., & Li, G. Y. (2013). Energy-efficient resource allocation for cognitive radio networks. In 2013 IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 1026–1031). IEEE.
Xie, R., Yu, F. R., Ji, H., & Li, Y. (2012). Energy-efficient resource allocation for heterogeneous cognitive radio networks with femtocells. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 11(11), 3910–3920.
Zhou, Z., Xiong, F., Xu, C., He, Y., & Mumtaz, S. (2018). Energy-efficient vehicular heterogeneous networks for green cities. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 14(4), 1522–1531.
Zhou, Z., Gao, C., Xu, C., Chen, T., Zhang, D., & Mumtaz, S. (2017). Energy-efficient stable matching for resource allocation in energy harvesting-based device-to-device communications. IEEE Access, 5, 15184–15196.
Xu, C., Feng, J., Zhou, Z., Chang, Z., Han, Z., & Mumtaz, S. (2017). Two-stage matching for energy-efficient resource management in D2D cooperative relay communications. In GLOBECOM 2017-2017 IEEE global communications conference (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
Ahmed, I., Khammari, H., & Shahid, A. (2017). Resource allocation for transmit hybrid beamforming in decoupled millimeter wave multiuser-MIMO downlink. IEEE Access, 5, 170–182.
Mesodiakaki, A., Adelantado, F., Alonso, L., Di Renzo, M., & Verikoukis, C. (2017). Energy-and spectrum-efficient user association in millimeter-wave backhaul small-cell networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(2), 1810–1821.
Holma, H., Toskala, A., & Nakamura, T. (2020). 5G technology: 3GPP new radio. Wiley.
Hu, J., Heng, W., Zhang, G., & Li, X. (2017). Energy efficient resource allocation in timesharing multiuser systems with hybrid energy harvesting transmitter. China Communications, 14(8), 83–92.
Karuppasamy, M., Suprakash, S., & Balakannan, S. (2017). Energy-aware resource allocation for an unceasing green cloud environment. In 2017 International conference on intelligent computing and control (I2C2) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.
Yu, Y.-J., Pang, A.-C., Hsiu, P.-C., & Fang, Y. (2013). Energy-efficient downlink resource allocation for mobile devices in wireless systems. In 2013 IEEE Globecom workshops (GC Wkshps) (pp. 4692–4698). IEEE.
Zhou, Z., Dong, M., Ota, K., Wang, G., & Yang, L. T. (2016). Energy-efficient resource allocation for D2D communications underlaying cloud-RAN-based LTE-A networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(3), 428–438.
Usman, M. J., Samad, A., Chizari, H., & Aliyu, A. (2017). Energy-efficient virtual machine allocation technique using interior search algorithm for cloud datacenter. In 2017 6th ICT international student project conference (ICT-ISPC) (pp. 1–4) IEEE.
Gong, X., Guo, L., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Joint resource allocation and software-based reconfiguration for energy-efficient OFDMA-PONs. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 10(8), C75–C85.
Zeng, W., Zheng, Y. R., & Schober, R. (2015). Online resource allocation for energy harvesting downlink multiuser systems: Precoding with modulation, coding rate, and subchannel selection. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(10), 5780–5794.
Saleh, G., Koksal, C. E., & B. Shroff, C. E. (2013). Optimal SINR based resource allocation for simultaneous energy and information transfer. In 2013 IEEE global conference on signal and information processing (GlobalSIP) (pp. 391–394) IEEE.
Liu, Z., Tao, X., & ur Rehman, W. (2017). Resource allocation for two-way amplify and forward OFDM relay networks. China Communications, 14(8), 76–82.
Liu, J., & Wang, B. (2014). Energy-efficient radio resource allocation for device-to-device underlay communication using combinatorial auction. In 2014 International conference on anti-counterfeiting, security, and identification (ASID) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
Gravalos, I., Makris, P., Christodoulopoulos, K., & Varvarigos, E. A. (2018). Efficient network planning for Internet of Things with QoS constraints. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(5), 3823–3836.
Mukherjee, A. (2018). Energy efficiency and delay in 5G ultra-reliable low-latency communications system architectures. IEEE Netw, 32(2), 55–61.
Pliatsios, D., Sarigiannidis, P., Goudos, S., & Karagiannidis, G. K. (2018). Realizing 5G vision through Cloud RAN: Technologies, challenges, and trends. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking., 2018(1), 136.
Vaezi, M., Ding, Z., & Poor, H. V. (2019). Multiple access techniques for 5G wireless networks and beyond. Springer.
Nguyen, L. D., Tuan, H. D., Duong, T. Q., Dobre, O. A., & Poor, H. V. (2018). Downlink beamforming for energy-efficient heterogeneous networks with massive MIMO and small cells. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 17(5), 3386–3400.
Gachhadar, A., Qamar, F., Dong, D. S., Majed, M. B., Hanafi, E., & Amiri, I. S. (2019). Traffic offloading in 5G heterogeneous networks using rank based network selection. Journal of Engineering Science & Technology Review, 12(2), 1–15.
Freewan, I., Daigle, J. N., & Wang, F. (2018). Maximizing cache value for distributing content via small cells in 5G. In 2018 IEEE seventh international conference on communications and electronics (ICCE) (pp. 353–360). IEEE.
Demestichas, P., Georgakopoulos, A., Karvounas, D., Tsagkaris, K., Stavroulaki, V., Lu, J., Xiong, C., & Yao, J. (2013). 5G on the Horizon: Key challenges for the radio-access network. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 8(3), 47–53.
Koutitas, G., & Demestichas, P. (2010). A review of energy efficiency in telecommunication networks. Telfor Journal, 2(1), 2–7.
Oh, E., & Krishnamachari, B. (2010). Energy savings through dynamic base station switching in cellular wireless access networks. GLOBECOM, 2010, 1–5.
Zhou, S., Gong, J., Yang, Z., Niu, Z., & Yang, P. (2009). Green mobile access network with dynamic base station energy saving. ACM MobiCom, 9(262), 10–12.
Soldani, D., & Manzalini, A. (2015). Horizon 2020 and beyond: On the 5G operating system for a true digital society. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 10(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/MVT.2014.2380581.
Marsch, P., Da Silva, I., Bulakci, O., Tesanovic, M., El Ayoubi, S. E., Rosowski, T., Kaloxylos, A., & Boldi, M. (2016). 5G Radio access network architecture: Design guidelines and key considerations. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(11), 24–32.
Thors, B., Colombi, D., Ying, Z., Bolin, T., & Törnevik, C. (2016). Exposure to RF EMF from array antennas in 5G mobile communication equipment. IEEE Access, 4, 7469–7478. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2601145.
Björnson, E., Sanguinetti, L., Wymeersch, H., Hoydis, J., & Marzetta, T. L. (2019). Massive MIMO is a reality—What is next? Five promising research directions for antenna arrays. Digital Signal Processing, 94, 3–20.
Björnson, E., Hoydis, J., & Sanguinetti, L. (2017). "Massive MIMO networks: Spectral, energy, and hardware efficiency. Foundations and Trends® in Signal Processing, 11(3–4), 154–655.
Conte, A., Feki, A., Chiaraviglio, L., Ciullo, D., Meo, M., & Ajmone Marsan, M. (2011). Cell wilting and blossoming for energy efficiency. IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine, 18(5), 50–57.
Peng, C., Lee, S.-B., Lu, S., & Luo, H. (2014). GreenBSN: Enabling energy-proportional cellular base station networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 13(11), 2537–2551.
Samarakoon, S., Bennis, M., Saad, W., Debbah, M., & Latva-Aho, M. (2016). Ultra dense small cell networks: Turning density into energy efficiency. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 34(5), 1267–1280.
Leroux, P., Callard, A., Đào, N.-D., & Stephenne, A. (2015). 5G access-link provisioning and coordination: Tradeoff between proactive and reactive strategies. In 2015 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC) (pp. 995–999). IEEE.
Zhang, Z., . Liu, Z., & Zeng, Z. (2017). The cell zooming algorithm for energy efficiency optimization in heterogeneous cellular network. In 2017 9th International conference on wireless communications and signal processing (WCSP) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
He, S., Li, X., Chen, J., Cheng, P., Sun, Y., & Simplot-Ryl, D. (2013). EMD: Energy-efficient P2P message dissemination in delay-tolerant wireless sensor and actor networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 31(9), 75–84.
Cao, Y., & Sun, Z. (2013). Routing in delay/disruption tolerant networks: A taxonomy, survey and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(2), 654–677.
Zeng, Y., Xiang, K., Li, D., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2013). Directional routing and scheduling for green vehicular delay tolerant networks. Wireless Networks, 19(2), 161–173.
Klinkowski, M. (2018). Planning of 5G C-RAN with optical fronthaul: A scalability analysis of an ILP model. In 2018 20th International conference on transparent optical networks (ICTON) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.
Tornatore, M., Chang, G.-K., & Ellinas, G. (2017). Fiber-wireless convergence in next-generation communication networks. Springer.
Chiaraviglio, L., Cacciapuoti, A. S., Di Martino, G., Fiore, M., Montesano, M., Trucchi, D., & Melazzi, N. B. (2018). Planning 5G networks under EMF constraints: State of the art and vision. IEEE Access, 6, 51021–5103.
Lv, X., Zhang, D., Zhang, Y., Jin, F., & . Li, F. (2017). An energy-saving association control algorithm for wireless networks. In 2017 4th International conference on industrial economics system and industrial security engineering (IEIS'2017) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
Rolly, R. M., & Poornima, R. M. (2014). Cell zooming for energy efficient cellular networks. In 2014 International conference on control, instrumentation, communication and computational technologies (ICCICCT) (pp. 1075–1078). IEEE.
Wu, S., Liu, F., Zeng, Z., & Xia, H. (2016). Cooperative sleep and power allocation for energy saving in dense small cell networks. IEEE Access, 4, 6993–7004.
Ming, Z., Jing, Z., Wuyang, Z., Jinkang, Z., & Sihai, Z. (2015). Energy efficiency optimization in relay-assisted networks with energy harvesting relay constraints. China Communications, 12(2), 84–94.
Liu, Y. W. J., Zhao, Z., Zhang, S., & Song, J. (2015). Energy-efficient resource allocation in OFDMA-based wireless multicast systems. In 2015 17th International conference on advanced communication technology (ICACT), Seoul (pp. 419–426).
Zhang, S., Wu, J., Gong, J., Zhou, S., & Niu, Z. (2014). Energy-optimal probabilistic base station sleeping under a separation network architecture. In 2014 IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 4239–4244). IEEE.
Saker, L., Elayoubi, S.-E., & Chahed, T. (2010). Minimizing energy consumption via sleep mode in green base station. In 2010 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
Wang, Q., & Liu, H. (2015). Optimized base station sleeping and renewable energy procurement using PSO. In 2015 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC) (pp. 319–324). IEEE.
Ramamoorthi, Y., & Kumar, A. (2018). Resource allocation for CoMP in cellular networks with base station sleeping. IEEE Access, 6, 12620–12633.
Jia, C., & Lim, T. J. (2015). Resource partitioning and user association with sleep-mode base stations in heterogeneous cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(7), 3780–3793.
Hu, S., Chen, X., Ni, W., Wang, X., & Hossain, E. (2019). Modeling and analysis of energy harvesting and smart grid-powered wireless communication networks: A contemporary survey, arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.13203.
Miozzo, M. (2018). Energy sustainability of next generation cellular networks through learning techniques.
Marsan, M. A., Bucalo, G., Di Caro, A., Meo, M., & Zhang, Y. (2013). Towards zero grid electricity networking: Powering BSs with renewable energy sources. In 2013 IEEE international conference on communications workshops (ICC) (pp. 596–601). IEEE.
Zhang, H., Chu, X., Guo, W., & Wang, S. (2015). Coexistence of Wi-Fi and heterogeneous small cell networks sharing unlicensed spectrum. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(3), 158–164.
Yadav, A., Nguyen, T. M., & Ajib, W. (2016). Optimal energy management in hybrid energy small cell access points. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 64(12), 5334–5348.
Wu, J. (2012). Green wireless communications: from concept to reality [industry perspectives]. IEEE Wireless Communications, 19(4), 4–5.
Gandotra, P., Jha, R. K., & Jain, S. (2017). Green communication in next generation cellular networks: A survey. IEEE Access, 5, 11727–11758.
Wang, B., Yang, Q., & Deng, X. (2017). Energy management for cost minimization in green heterogeneous networks. Future Generation Computer Systems, 56, 45.
Wang, L. C., & Rangapillai, S. (2012). A survey on green 5G cellular networks. In 2012 International conference on signal processing and communications (SPCOM) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
Akan, O. B., Cetinkaya, O., Koca, C., & Ozger, M. (2018). Internet of hybrid energy harvesting things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(2), 736–746.
Chiang, Y.-H., & Liao, W. (2016). Green multicell cooperation in heterogeneous networks with hybrid energy sources. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 15(12), 7911–7925.
Le, T. A., Nguyen, H. X., Vien, Q.-T., & Karamanoglu, M. (2015). Secure information transmission and power transfer in cellular networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 19(9), 1532–1535.
Qiao, G., Leng, S., Zhang, K., & Yang, K. (2017). Joint deployment and mobility management of energy harvesting small cells in heterogeneous networks. IEEE Access, 5, 183–196.
Liu, D., Chen, Y., Chai, K. K., & Zhang, T. (2014). Distributed delay-energy aware user association in 3-tier HetNets with hybrid energy sources. In 2014 IEEE Globecom workshops (GC Wkshps) (pp. 1109–1114). IEEE.
Liu, D., Chen, Y., Chai, K. K., Zhang, T., & Elkashlan, M. (2015). Two-dimensional optimization on user association and green energy allocation for HetNets with hybrid energy sources. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 63(11), 4111–4124.
Zhai, D., Sheng, M., Wang, X., & Li, Y. (2015). Leakage-aware dynamic resource allocation in hybrid energy powered cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 63(11), 4591–4603.
Mao, Y., Zhang, J., & Letaief, K. B. (2015). A Lyapunov optimization approach for green cellular networks with hybrid energy supplies. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 33(12), 2463–2477.
Reyhanian, N., Maham, B., Shah-Mansouri, V., Tushar, W., & Yuen, C. (2017). Game-theoretic approaches for energy cooperation in energy harvesting small cell networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(8), 7178–7194.
Chang, C. Y., Ho, K. L., Liao, W., & Shiu, D. S. (2014). Capacity maximization of energy-harvesting small cells with dynamic sleep mode operation in heterogeneous networks. In 2014 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 2690–2694). IEEE.
Liu, D., Chen, Y., Chai, K. K., Zhang, T., & Pan, C. (2014). Adaptive user association in HetNets with renewable energy powered base stations. In 2014 21st International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT) (pp. 93–97). IEEE.
Sangare, F. (2017). RF energy harvesting and information transfer implementation in the internet of things.
Malla, S. (2017). Power optimization in wireless communication systems. IRC-Library, Information Resource Center der Jacobs University Bremen.
Nasir, A. A., Ngo, D. T., Zhou, X., Kennedy, R. A., & Durrani, S. (2016). Joint resource optimization for multicell networks with wireless energy harvesting relays. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(8), 6168–6183.
Lohani, S., Hossain, E., & Bhargava, V. K. (2016). Resource allocation for wireless information and energy transfer in macrocell-small cell networks. In 2016 IEEE 84th vehicular technology conference (VTC-Fall) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
Zhang, Y., Chowdhury, P., Tornatore, M., & Mukherjee, B. (2010). Energy efficiency in telecom optical networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 12(4), 441–458.
Jahid, A., Hossain, M. S., Monju, M. K. H., Rahman, M. F., & Hossain, M. F. (2020). Techno-economic and energy efficiency analysis of optimal power supply solutions for green cellular base stations. IEEE Access, 8, 43776–43795.
He, X., He, A., Chen, Y., Chai, K. K., & Zhang, T. (2017). Energy efficient resource allocation in heterogeneous cloud radio access networks. In WCNC (pp. 1–6).
Yuan, C., Li, Y., & Yin, C. (2017). Energy efficient power allocation and user association in heterogeneous cloud radio access networks. In 2017 3rd IEEE international conference on computer and communications (ICCC) (pp. 289–294): IEEE.
Xu, B., Chen, Y., Requena-Carrión, J., Loo, J., & Vinel, A. V. (2017). Energy-aware power control in energy cooperation aided millimeter wave cellular networks with renewable energy resources. IEEE Access, 5, 432–442.
Carli, R., & Dotoli, M. (2015). A decentralized resource allocation approach for sharing renewable energy among interconnected smart homes. In 2015 IEEE 54th annual conference on decision and control (CDC) (pp. 5903–5908): IEEE.
Ramamonjison, R., & Bhargava, V. K. (2016). Energy allocation and cooperation for energy-efficient wireless two-tier networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 15(9), 6434–6448.
Li, D., Saad, W., & Hong, C. S. (2016). Decentralized renewable energy pricing and allocation for millimeter wave cellular backhaul. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 34(5), 1140–1159.
Liu, D., Chen, Y., Chai, K. K., Zhang, T., & Elkashlan, M. (2015). Two-dimensional optimization on user association and green energy allocation for hetnets with hybrid energy sources. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 63(11), 4111–4124.
Gong, J., Thompson, J. S., Zhou, S., & Niu, Z. (2014). Base station sleeping and resource allocation in renewable energy powered cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 62(11), 3801–3813.
Yang, J., Yang, Q., Shen, Z., & Kwak, K. S. (2016). Suboptimal online resource allocation in hybrid energy supplied OFDMA cellular networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 20(8), 1639–1642.
Carli, R., Dotoli, M., Garramone, R., Andria, R., & Lanzolla, A. M. L. (2016). An average consensus approach for the optimal allocation of a shared renewable energy source. In 2016 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC) (pp. 270–275). IEEE.
Peng, M., Sun, Y., Li, X., Mao, Z., & Wang, C. (2016). Recent advances in cloud radio access networks: System architectures, key techniques, and open issues. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(3), 2282–2308.
Almayyahi, A. A., Sulaiman, R., Qamar, F., & Hamzah, A. E. (2020). High-security image steganography technique using XNOR operation and fibonacci algorithm. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 11(10), 511–522.
Dai, B., & Yu, W. (2016). Energy efficiency of downlink transmission strategies for cloud radio access networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 34(4), 1037–1050.
Alimi, I. A., Teixeira, A. L., & Monteiro, P. P. (2017). Toward an efficient C-RAN optical fronthaul for the future networks: A tutorial on technologies, requirements, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(1), 708–769.
Zhan, S., & Niyato, D. (2017). A coalition formation game for remote radio head cooperation in cloud radio access network. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(2), 1723–1738. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2016.2558581.
Iwamura, M. (2015). NGMN view on 5G architecture. In 2015 IEEE 81st vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring), 11–14 May 2015 (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1109/VTCSpring.2015.7145953
Skillermark, P., & Frenger, P. (2012). Enhancing energy efficiency in LTE with antenna muting. In 2012 IEEE 75th vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
Li, Y., Jiang, T., Luo, K., & Mao, S. (2017). Green heterogeneous cloud radio access networks: potential techniques, performance trade-offs, and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(11), 33–39.
Mardamutu, K., Ponnusamy, V., & Zaman, N. (2018). Green energy in data centers. In Sustainable development: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 386–401). IGI Global.
Li, C., Zhang, J., & Letaief, K. B. (2014). Throughput and energy efficiency analysis of small cell networks with multi-antenna base stations. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13(5), 2505–2517.
Kizilirmak, R. C., Narmanlioglu, O., & Uysal, M. (2017). Centralized light access network (c-LiAN): A novel paradigm for next generation indoor VLC networks. IEEE Access, 5, 19703–19710.
Ghosh, A., Mangalvedhe, N., Ratasuk, R., Mondal, B., Cudak, M., Visotsky, E., Thomas, T. A., Andrews, J. G., Xia, P., Jo, H. S., & Dhillon, H. S. (2012). Heterogeneous cellular networks: From theory to practice. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(6), 54–64.
Peng, M., Li, Y., Jiang, J., Li, J., & Wang, C. (2014). Heterogeneous cloud radio access networks: A new perspective for enhancing spectral and energy efficiencies, arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.3028.
Damnjanovic, A., Montojo, J., Wei, Y., Ji, T., Luo, T., Vajapeyam, M., Yoo, T., Song, O., & Malladi, D. (2011). A survey on 3GPP heterogeneous networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 18(3), 10–21.
Qamar, F., Hindia, M. N., Dimyati, K., Noordin, K. A., & Amiri, I. S. (2019). Interference management issues for the future 5G network: A review. Telecommunication Systems, 71(4), 627–643.
Hindia, M. N., Qamar, F., Abbas, T., Dimyati, K., Abu Talip, M. S., & Amiri, I. S. (2019). Interference cancelation for high-density fifth-generation relaying network using stochastic geometrical approach. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 15(7), 1550147719855879.
Agramal, P., Chen, J.-C., & Sivalingam, K. M. (2002). Energy efficient protocols for wireless systems. In Wireless multimedia network technologies (pp. 187–204). Springer.
Cui, S., Goldsmith, A. J., & Bahai, A. (2004). Energy-efficiency of MIMO and cooperative MIMO techniques in sensor networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 22(6), 1089–1098.
Ozel, O., Shahzad, K., & Ulukus, S. (2014). Optimal energy allocation for energy harvesting transmitters with hybrid energy storage and processing cost. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 62(12), 3232–3245.
Yang, J., & Ulukus, S. (2012). Optimal packet scheduling in an energy harvesting communication system. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 60(1), 220–230.
Lopez-Perez, D., Guvenc, I., . De la Roche, I., Kountouris, M., Quek, T. Q. S., & Zhang, J. (2011). Enhanced inter-cell interference coordination challenges in heterogeneous networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1112.1597.
Touati, H., Castel-Taleb, H., Jouaber, B., Akbarzadeh, S., & Khlass, A. (2018). Modeling and performance evaluation of the eICIC/ABS in H-CRAN.
E. U. T. R. Access. (2014). Radio frequency (rf) requirements for lte pico node b (release 12), ed: 3GPP Std.
Peng, M., Li, Y., Jiang, J., Li, J., & Wang, C. (2014). Heterogeneous cloud radio access networks: A new perspective for enhancing spectral and energy efficiencies. IEEE Wireless Communications, 21(6), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2014.7000980.
Jing, W., Lu, Z., Wen, X., Hu, Z., & Yang, S. (2015). Flexible resource allocation for joint optimization of energy and spectral efficiency in OFDMA multi-cell networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 19(3), 451–454.
Xiong, C., Li, G. Y., Zhang, S., Chen, Y., & Xu, S. (2011). Energy-and spectral-efficiency tradeoff in downlink OFDMA networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(11), 3874–3886.
Luo, J., Chen, Q., & Tang, L. (2018). Reducing power consumption by joint sleeping strategy and power control in delay-aware C-RAN. IEEE Access, 6, 14655–14667.
Zhou, Z., Dong, M., Ota, K., Wu, J., & Sato, T. (2014). Energy efficiency and spectral efficiency tradeoff in device-to-device (D2D) communications. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 3(5), 485–488.
Huang, S., Chen, H., Cai, J., & Zhao, F. (2013). Energy efficiency and spectral-efficiency tradeoff in amplify-and-forward relay networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 62(9), 4366–4378.
Ku, I., Wang, C.-X., & Thompson, J. (2013). Spectral-energy efficiency tradeoff in relay-aided cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12(10), 4970–4982.
Lau, V. K. N., & Cui, Y. (2010). Delay-optimal power and subcarrier allocation for OFDMA systems via stochastic approximation. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 9(1), 227–233.
Cui, Y., & Lau, V. K. N. (2010). Distributive stochastic learning for delay-optimal OFDMA power and subband allocation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 58(9), 4848–4858.
Liu, F., Yang, Q., He, Q., Park, D., & Kwak, K. S. (2019). Dynamic power and subcarrier allocation for downlink OFDMA systems under imperfect CSI. Wireless Networks, 25(2), 545–558.
Feng, D., Jiang, C., Lim, G., Cimini, L. J., Feng, G., & Li, G. Y. (2013). A survey of energy-efficient wireless communications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(1), 167–178.
He, C., Sheng, B., Zhu, P., You, X., & Li, G. Y. (2013). Energy-and spectral-efficiency tradeoff for distributed antenna systems with proportional fairness. IEEE Journal on Selected areas in Communications, 31(5), 894–902.
Cheung, K. T. K., Yang, S., & Hanzo, L. (2014). Spectral and energy spectral efficiency optimization of joint transmit and receive beamforming based multi-relay MIMO-OFDMA cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13(11), 6147–6165.
Yang, J., & Ulukus, S. (2012). Optimal packet scheduling in a multiple access channel with energy harvesting transmitters. Journal of Communications and Networks, 14(2), 140–150.
Pan, C., Elkashlan, M., Wang, J., Yuan, J., & Hanzo, L. (2018). User-centric C-RAN architecture for ultra-dense 5G networks: Challenges and methodologies. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56(6), 14–20.
Xu, X., Sun, Z., Dai, X., Tao, X., & Zhang, P. (2016). A frameless network architecture for the way forward of C-RAN. China Communications, 13(6), 154–166.
Zhang, H., Ji, H., Li, X., Wang, K., & Wang, W. (2015). Energy efficient resource allocation over cloud-RAN based heterogeneous network. In 2015 IEEE 7th international conference on cloud computing technology and science (CloudCom) (pp. 483–486). IEEE.
Duan, S., Chen, Z., & Zhang, D. (2018). Resource allocation optimisation for delay-sensitive traffic in energy harvesting cloud radio access network. IET Communications, 12(6), 641–648.
Younis, A., Tran, T. X., & Pompili, D. (2018). Bandwidth and energy-aware resource allocation for cloud radio access networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 52, 36.
Alqerm, I., & Shihada, B. (2018). Sophisticated online learning scheme for green resource allocation in 5g heterogeneous cloud radio access networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 54, 896.
Zhang, D., Chen, Z., Cai, L. X., Zhou, H., Duan, S., Ren, J., Shen, X., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Resource allocation for green cloud radio access networks with hybrid energy supplies. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(2), 1684–169.
Chughtai, N. A., Ali, M., Qaisar, S., Imran, M., Naeem, M., & Qamar, F. (2018). Energy efficient resource allocation for energy harvesting aided H-CRAN. IEEE Access, 6, 43990–44001.
AlQerm, I., & Shihada, B. (2017). Enhanced machine learning scheme for energy efficient resource allocation in 5G heterogeneous cloud radio access networks. In IEEE symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications (PIMRC) (pp. 1–7).
Mei, H., Wang, K., & Yang, K. (2017). Multi-layer cloud-RAN with cooperative resource allocations for low-latency computing and communication services. IEEE Access, 5, 19023–19032.
Lee, Y. L., Wang, L.-C., Chuah, T. C., & Loo, J. (2016). Joint resource allocation and user association for heterogeneous cloud radio access networks. In 2016 28th International teletraffic congress (ITC 28) (vol. 1, pp. 87–93). IEEE.
Ran, C., & Wang, S. (2015). Resource allocation in heterogeneous cloud radio access networks: A workload balancing perspective. In 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
Peng, M., Wang, C., Lau, V., & Poor, H. V. (2015). Fronthaul-constrained cloud radio access networks: Insights and challenges. IEEE Wireless Communications, 22(2), 152–160.
Luong, P. T. T. (2018). Energy-efficient resource allocation in limited fronthaul capacity cloud-radio access networks. École de technologie supérieure.
Yu, N., Miao, Y., Mu, L., Du, H., Huang, H., & Jia, X. (2016). Minimizing energy cost by dynamic switching ON/OFF base stations in cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 15(11), 7457–7469.
Saleh, N., & Patel, N. (2017). Enhancing spectrum efficiently and energy efficiently via offloading mechanism in heterogeneous networks (in context of Wi-Fi and LTE-Advanced). In 2017 International conference on innovations in electronics, signal processing and communication (IESC) (pp. 171–177) IEEE.
Qamar, F., Dimyati, K., Hindia, M. N., Noordin, K. A., & Amiri, I. S. (2019). A stochastically geometrical poisson point process approach for the future 5G D2D enabled cooperative cellular network. IEEE Access, 7, 60465–60485.
Lee, W., Kim, M., & Cho, D.-H. (2018). Deep learning based transmit power control in underlaid device-to-device communication. IEEE Systems Journal, 13(3), 2551–2554.
Lee, W., Kim, M., & Cho, D.-H. (2018). Transmit power control using deep neural network for underlay device-to-device communication. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 8(1), 141–144.
Wang, Z., Mao, T., & Wang, Q. (2017). Optical OFDM for visible light communications. In 2017 13th International wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC) (pp. 1190–1194). IEEE.
Liu, D., & Yang, C. (2016). Energy efficiency of downlink networks with caching at base stations. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 34(4), 907–922.
Zhang, X., Cao, Y., Peng, L., & Li, J. (2019). Enhancing mobile data offloading with in-network caching. In Paving the way for 5G through the convergence of wireless systems (pp. 250–270). IGI Global.
Qamar, F., Hindia, M. H. D., Dimyati, K., Noordin, K. A., Majed, M. B., Abd Rahman, T., & Amiri, I. S. (2019). Investigation of future 5G-IoT millimeter-wave network performance at 38 GHz for urban microcell outdoor environment. Electronics, 8(5), 495.
Qamar, F., Hindia, M. N., Rahman, T. A., Hassan, R., & Saleem, S. (2020). Outdoor propagation channel investigation at 26 GHz for 5G mm wave communication. In 2020 IEEE student conference on research and development (SCOReD) (pp. 189–193). IEEE.
Shahid, M. K., Debretsion, F., Eyob, A., Ahmed, I., & Faisal, T. (2020). Energy efficiency in 5G communications-conventional to machine learning approaches. Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, 4, 1–9.
Amiri, R., Mehrpouyan, H. (2018). Self-organizing mm wave networks: A power allocation scheme based on machine learning. In 2018 11th Global symposium on millimeter waves (GSMM) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.
Tang, J., Tay, W. P., & Quek, T. Q. S. (2015). Cross-layer resource allocation with elastic service scaling in cloud radio access network. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(9), 5068–5081. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2015.2432023.
Madjar, H. M. (2016). Human radio frequency exposure limits: An update of reference levels in Europe, USA, Canada, China, Japan and Korea. In 2016 International symposium on electromagnetic compatibility-EMC EUROPE (pp. 467–473). IEEE.
De La Oliva, A., Pérez, X. C., Azcorra, A., Di Giglio, A., Cavaliere, F., Tiegelbekkers, D., Lessmann, J., Haustein, T., Mourad, A., & Iovanna, P. (2015). Xhaul: toward an integrated fronthaul/backhaul architecture in 5G networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 22(5), 32–40.
Gupta, A., & Jha, R. K. (2015). A survey of 5G network: Architecture and emerging technologies. IEEE access, 3, 1206–1232.
Qamar, F., Siddiqui, M. H. S., Hindia, M. N., Dimyati, K., Rahman, T. A., & Talip, M. S. A. (2018). Propagation channel measurement at 38 GHz for 5G mm-wave communication network. In 2018 IEEE student conference on research and development (SCOReD) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) from the Ministry of Higher Education, Grant No. FP091-2018A.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest exists for this work.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: List of acronyms
Appendix: List of acronyms
Abbreviation | Meaning | Abbreviation | Meaning |
---|---|---|---|
AP | Access point | SCAP | Small cell access point |
BBUs | Baseband units | SCNs | Small-cell networks |
BS | Base stations | SE | Spectrum efficiency |
DAS | Distributed antenna system | CO2 | Carbon dioxide |
DEPA | Dynamic energy-aware power allocation | C-RAN | Cloud radio access networks |
EE | Energy efficiency | CSIT | Channel state information transmitter |
EE-SCNS | Energy efficient small-cell networks | PON | Passive optical network |
EMF | Electromagnetic fields | SWIPT | Simultaneous wireless information and power transfer |
EH | Energy harvesting | SCNs | Small-cell networks |
MBS | Macro base stations | SBSs | Small base stations |
EU FP7 | European Union Seventh Framework Program | UE | User equipment |
H-C-RANs | HetNet based on cloud radio network | MIMO | Multiple-input and multiple-output |
HetNet | Heterogeneous network | OFDM | Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing access |
RA | Resource allocation | OWC | Optical wireless communication |
RAN | Radio access network | PF | Proportional fairness |
RATs | Radio access technologies | QoS | Quality of service |
RF | Radio frequency | SWIPT | Simultaneous wireless information and power transfer |
RON | Radio-optical communication networks | VLC | Visible light communications |
RRHs | Remote Radio Heads | RE | Renewable Energy |
SBS | Small Base Stations | CO | Cloud Operating |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malathy, S., Jayarajan, P., Ojukwu, H. et al. A review on energy management issues for future 5G and beyond network. Wireless Netw 27, 2691–2718 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-021-02616-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-021-02616-z