Abstract
Community structure and distribution of chaetognaths were investigated along the upwelled and non-upwelled waters of Southeastern Arabian Sea (SEAS) from the coastal, shelf and open ocean regions. With the onset of monsoon, intense upwelling along the southern part of SEAS (8° 28′ N) and a weak coastal upwelling along the northern counterpart (15° 30′ N) was evident. Zooplankton biomass was observed to be high in the upwelled waters with the dominance of copepods. Chaetognaths were also observed in significant numbers all along the SEAS, however maximum numerical abundance was observed in the southern upwelled waters. Chaetognaths belonging to 10 genera were identified of which genus Flaccisagitta (54%) made the most dominant group along the entire study area followed, in order of abundance, by Serratosagitta (20%), Mesosagitta (18.2%), Sagitta (12.3%), Ferosagitta (11%) and Krohnitta (6.4%). Flaccisagitta were observed to be abundant in the upwelled waters along with Pterosagitta, Serratosagitta, Sagitta, Krohnitta and Ferosagitta whereas genus Mesosagitta dominated the non-upwelled waters of northern transects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Biological production in the Arabian Sea is governed by physicochemical processes that alter with biannually reversing monsoon forcing (Qasim 1982; Krey and Babenerd 1976). Seasonality in the Arabian Sea is defined and divided into Southwest Monsoon (SWM), Fall Inter-monsoon (FIM), Northeast Monsoon (NEM) and Spring Inter-monsoon (SIM) respectively. SWM characterized by strong westerly winds instigates coastal and open ocean upwelling (Brock et al. 1991) which along with wind-driven mixing (McCreary et al. 1996; Lee et al. 2000) and lateral advection (Young and Kindle 1994; Prasannakumar et al. 2001) initiates high primary productivity in the Arabian Sea. However, this phenomenon is more prominent along the southern part of eastern Arabian Sea (below 15° N latitude) or the South eastern Arabian Sea (SEAS). On the other hand, the region north of 15° N (Northeastern Arabian Sea or NEAS) experiences high primary productivity during the northeast monsoon. The cold and dry northeast winds cause the densification and sinking of surface water resulting in convective mixing (Madhupratap et al. 1996; Prasannakumar and Prasad 1996) and nutrient enrichment triggering high phytoplankton production.
Secondary production in the marine ecosystem is mainly contributed by the zooplankton community. Being an essential component of the pelagic food web, they play a dual role as phytoplankton consumers and contributors to the higher trophic level (Goswami et al. 1992; Atkinson 1996; Pitchaikani and Lipton 2015). Understanding on the distribution pattern and community compositions of zooplankton of Arabian Sea come from three significant expeditions: John Murray Expedition (JME, 1933–1934), International Indian Ocean Expedition (IIOE, 1959–1965) and Indian Ocean Experiment (IOE, 1979). Data from the previous studies of IIOE include copepod (Panikkar 1970), chaetognath (Nair 1969; Nair and Rao 1973), ostracod (George1969), amphipod (Nair et al. 1973), euphausiids (Brinton and Gopalakrishnan 1973; Gopalakrishnan and Brinton 1969), polychaete worms (Peter 1969a), fish larvae (Peter 1969b) and cephalopod juveniles (Aravindakshan and Sakthivel 1973) as the major zooplankton group of the basin. Mesozooplankton biomass in the Arabian Sea remains constant throughout the year irrespective of the seasons, which is referred to as the ‘Arabian sea paradox’ (Madhupratap et al. 1996). During summer and winter monsoon, upwelling and convective mixing respectively, result in high productivity and hence high zooplankton biomass. However, during inter-monsoon, primary productivity declines with constant zooplankton biomass through ‘microbial loop’ (Azam et al. 1983), which prevails during this period. Hence the secondary production in the Arabian Sea remains constant all-round the year (Madhupratap et al. 2004).
Chaetognath, a major zooplankton taxon, commonly called “arrow worms” includes about 209 species recorded in the World Ocean (Bieri 1991; Vega-Perez and Schinke 2011). They have a wide range of distribution in estuaries, open oceans, tide pools, polar waters, marine caves, coastal lagoons and the deep sea. The biomass of chaetognath is considered to be 10–30% of that of entire copepod in world oceans and often rank second in abundance after copepods in the marine pelagic environments (Feigenbaum and Maris 1984; Shannon and Pillar 1986; Gibbons 1992). Being exclusively carnivorous, chaetognath plays a significant role in energy transfer from copepods to higher trophic level and thus, form a vital component of the food web in upwelling region (Giesecke and Gonzalez 2004; Ulloa et al. 2004). They prey upon pelagic organisms mainly copepods, fish larvae (Pearre 1982), polychaete (Giesecke and González 2004), euphausiids and their own kind (Gray 1961). Thus, chaetognath predation impacts the zooplankton and icthyoplankton communities of the world oceans (Casanova and Nair 1999). The close relationship of chaetognath with certain environmental variables and their species-specific horizontal and vertical distribution make them excellent indicators of water masses (Bieri 1959; Cheney 1985; Terazaki 1989) and their distribution pattern is associated with hydrographic phenomena such as upwelling event. The classic work on chaetognaths was done by Russell (1935 and 1939). Chaetognaths of Indian waters were studied by John (1933 and 1937), Varadarajan and Chacko (1943) and Chacko (1950). Works on the systematics of chaetognaths of Indian coastal waters were carried out by George (1952), Ganapati and Rao (1954), Rao (1958a, b) and Rao and Ganapati (1958). Nair et al. (2002) studied the abundance and community structure of chaetognaths in the northern Indian Ocean. Later, Kusum (2012), Kusum et al. (2014) and Nair et al. (2015) reported on the distribution of chaetognaths in the Indian EEZ (Exclusive Economic Zone). However, the present study attempts to understand the community composition of zooplankton and chaetognath along the southeastern Arabian sea during summer monsoon upwelling and to delineate the difference in community structure of chaetognaths between the upwelled and non-upwelled waters during the season.
Materials and methods
Samples were collected onboard research vessel FORV Sagar Sampada during the summer monsoon season (13th–31st July, 2017) along the coastal and open ocean regions of South Eastern Arabian sea. Four latitudinal transects, viz, Off Thiruvananthapuram (T1; 8° 28′ N), Off Kochi (T2; 9° 56′ N), Off Calicut (T3; 11° 21′ N) and Off Goa (T4; 15° 30′ N) were surveyed at the coastal, shelf and open ocean regions (Fig. 1). Vertical profiling of physical and chemical parameters such as temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen and density was obtained using Conductivity-Temperature-Depth profiler (CTD, Sea-Bird Electronics model 911 series, Sea-Bird Inc.). Chlorophyll a was measured spectrophotometrically using a Hitachi U-2900 UV/Visible spectrophotometer following 90% acetone extraction (Parsons et al. 1984). Major nutrients such as nitrate, phosphate, and silicate were estimated using standard procedures (Zhang and Fischer 2006; Grasshoff et al. 1983).
Zooplankton samples were collected using a standard zooplankton Bongo net by oblique hauls. Samples collected and biomass was estimated following the displacement volume method (Harris et al. 2000). Samples were preserved in 5% formaldehyde for later enumeration and identification. The sample was then sorted to group level based on standard keys, and the faunal composition and relative abundance of different zooplankton taxa were obtained. Chaetognath was sorted out from the mesozooplankton sample and identified to genus level based on identification keys (Tokioka 1965; Bieri 1991). Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis and plotting of data were carried out using statistical software like PRIMER V 6, Origin Pro 8.5 and SPSS.
Results
The South Eastern Arabian Sea is unique in its hydrographic features and is characterized by the phenomenon of coastal upwelling that influences the physicochemical and biological attributes of the region. During the present study sea surface temperature (SST) varied from 24.5 to 27.8 °C with an increasing trend from south to north along the coastal waters and with higher temperature along the offshore waters (~ 28.4 °C). Low SST (~ 25.2 °C) was observed along 8° 28′ N, 9° 56′ N and 11° 21′ N (upwelled waters) whereas towards 15°30′N (non-upwelling waters) comparatively high SST (28.4 °C) was observed (Fig. 2). Sea Surface Salinity (SSS) during the study period varied from 32.43 to 34.73 psu with higher values towards the south (8° 28′ N) as well as to the offshore waters, which further decreased towards the north. Dissolved Oxygen (DO) varied from 4.85 ml L−1 to 5.17 ml L−1 with low DO values towards the offshore waters (~ 3.9 ml L−1). The surface concentration of nitrate, phosphate and silicate along the study area were on an average of 2.69 µmol L−1, 0.8 µmol L−1 and 12.2 µmol L−1 respectively. The southern upwelled waters and the northern non-upwelled waters showed very slight variations in the concentration of nitrate, phosphate and silicate during the study period. However, nitrate concentration was comparatively high along the coastal waters of 8°28′N (~ 3.25 µmol L−1) and 9° 56′ N (~ 2.88 µmol L−1). Further north, in the non-upwelled waters concentration of nitrate, decreased (Fig. 3). Chlorophyll a concentration along the study area, varied from 0.01 to 10.84 mg m−3 showing a decreasing trend from south to north along the coastal waters with a highest concentration (~ 10.84 mg m−3) along 8°28′N.
Upwelling signatures were prominent during the season with a moderate to intense upwelling along the nearshore waters from 9° N to 13° N (off Thiruvananthapuram to off Calicut) and further north of 13° N (off Goa) signatures of upwelling weakened. Along 8°28′N an upsloping of 24 °C isotherm from 75 m to surface coastal waters indicate intense coastal upwelling extending to the offshore waters (Fig. 2a). An upsloping of 24 °C isotherm from 75 m to subsurface (20 m) coastal region along 9° 56′ N(off Kochi) indicate coastal upwelling extending to the shelf waters (Fig. 2b), however, along 11° 21′ N, 24 °C isotherm was evident below a depth of 70 m signifying weak coastal upwelling (Fig. 2c). The signatures of upwelling was almost absent along the northern transect (15°30′N) (Fig. 2d).
Mesozooplankton community structure
Mesozooplankton biomass along the study area varied from 0.05 to 0.77 ml m−3 with maximum along the shelf waters of 8° 28′ N and minimum along offshore waters of 15° 30′ N (Fig. 4). In general zooplankton biomass decreased from coast to open ocean regions and also from southern transects to north. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of zooplankton biomass showed a significant variation between the upwelled and non-upwelled waters (Global R: 0.896; p: 0.2%). Zooplankton biomass was higher along the southern upwelled waters (0.38 ml m−3) (Fig. 4a–c) while it decreased towards the non-upwelling regions (0.1 ml m−3) (Fig. 4d). Maximum biomass and abundance average (0.38 ml m−3; 20,869 no 10 m−3) was observed along 8° 28′ N, 9° 56′ N and 11° 21′ N (upwelled waters) and minimum (0.1 ml m−3; 2557 no 10 m−3) along 15° 30′ N (non-upwelled waters). Zooplankton diversity was observed to be high in the coastal waters (H′ = 1.54) from 8° 28′ N to 11° 21′ N; however, further north (15° 30′ N) diversity was maximum in the offshore waters (H′ = 1.14).
Community structure of mesozooplankton along the South Eastern Arabian Sea was dominated by copepods (80%). Cladocerans (10%) ranked second in abundance, followed by chaetognaths (9.1%). Other important mesozooplankton groups included tunicates, jellyfish, fish egg, decapod larvae and ostracods. The mesozooplankton groups like amphipods, polychaete larvae, doliolum, echinoderm larvae, pteropod and lucifer were observed in the least abundance. The coastal water off Kochi was dominated by cladocerans (85%) and the coastal and shelf water off Calicut was dominated by fish eggs (34% and 45% respectively). Zooplankton community structure in upwelled waters was dominated by copepod (> 60%), although along some regions cladocerans (coastal waters of 9° 56′ N) and fish eggs (coastal waters of 11° 21′ N) peaked. Other zooplankton groups included chaetognath, tunicates, cladocerans, amphipods, pteropods, siphonophores, decapod larvae, lucifer, echinoderm larvae, and doliolum. However, non-upwelled waters was dominated by copepods (> 80%) with other groups, chaetognath, fish egg, decapod larvae, tunicate, pteropod, only forming a minority of the population.
Chaetognath community structure
The abundance and diversity of chaetognaths varied along the study area with high numerical abundance in the southern upwelled transects (106 no 10 m−3) which decreased towards northern region with non-upwelled conditions (49 no 10 m−3). Within transects, the abundance of chaetognaths decreased from the coast to offshore except for the region off Thiruvananthapuram where the numerical abundance increased towards the offshore region (Fig. 5). Diversity was observed to be highest (H′ = 2.13) in the offshore waters along all transects and lowest (H′ = 0.8) in coastal waters. Species richness of chaetognath was maximum in the offshore waters (d = 1.51) along all transects and minimum (d = 0.71) in the coastal waters. Chaetognath evenness was observed to be maximum (J′ = 0.65) in the coastal waters of all transect except along 9°56′N where it was maximum (J′ = 0.86) along offshore. Considering upwelled and non-upwelled waters, diversity was high in the non-upwelled waters (H′ = 2.76) than the upwelled waters (H′ = 2.41). Cumulative dominance analysis and the resultant k-dominance plot clearly depicted the higher dominance in the upwelled waters than the non-upwelled waters (Fig. 6).
About 10 genera were identified during the study. Genus Flaccisagitta was dominant (54%) followed by Serratosagitta (20%), Mesosagitta (18.2%), Sagitta (12.3%), Ferosagitta (11%) and Krohnitta (6.4%). Common chaetognath species included, Flaccisagitta enflata, Pterosagitta draco, Sagitta bipunctata, Serratosagitta pacifica. Flaccisagitta dominated all transects of the South Eastern Arabian Sea with maximum abundance along coastal waters and a gradual decrease towards offshore waters. Along the coastal waters, the abundance was maximum along 9° 56′ N (97%) and minimum along 15° 30′ N (31%) showing a decreasing trend from south to north. Flaccisagitta enflata formed the most dominant chaetognath species along all transects with high abundance in the southern upwelling regions. Another species Pterosagitta draco (only species under genera Pterosagitta) was observed only in offshore waters of southern transects (8° 28′ N and 9° 56′ N). However, other chaetognath genera, Serratosagitta were present only in shelf and offshore waters of Kochi, Calicut and Goa with maximum along 9° 56′ N and 15° 30′ N (39%; 41%). Similarly, genus Ferosagitta dominated the offshore waters. Genus Mesosagitta dominated the shelf (81%) and open waters (73%) along 11° 21′ N and coastal waters (33%) of 15° 30′ N. Genus Sagitta was present along the entire study area with a higher dominance in southern transect than the north transect. The genus dominated the open water of 9° 56′ N (29%). Sagitta bipunctata dominated the upwelling regions of southern transects. The genus Krohnitta were identified mainly along the offshore waters of southern transects and was absent towards north. Other minor genera recorded during the study period include Aidanosagitta sp, Solidosagitta sp and Decipisagitta sp.
Within the upwelled waters, highest average abundance of chaetognaths were observed along 8° 28′ N (153 no 10 m−3), with highest abundance in offshore waters (347 no 10 m−3) and lowest along the coast (37 no 10 m−3) (Fig. 5a). The chaetognath community was dominated by Flaccisagitta sp. followed by genus Serratosagitta, Sagitta, Ferosagitta, Krohnitta, Pterosagitta and Solidosagitta. Along 9°56′N, maximum chaetognath abundance was in the coastal waters (155 no 10 m−3) and minimum along the shelf waters (45 no 10 m−3) (Fig. 5b), with an average abundance of 82 no 10 m−3. Genus Flaccisagitta, Serratosagitta, Sagitta, Ferosagitta, Krohnitta, Mesosagitta, Pterosagitta, Solidosagitta and Aidanosagitta consisted the chaetognath community along transect. The chaetognath abundance along 11°21′N varied between 6 no 10 m−3 to 168 no 10 m−3 (Fig. 5c), with an average of 83 no 10 m−3. Flaccisagitta sp. dominated the chaetognath community along the region. Other genus included, Mesosagitta, Sagitta, Serratosagitta, Krohnitta, Solidosagitta and Ferosagitta. The northern non-upwelling transect (15° 30′ N), observed a low average chaetognath abundance (49 no 10 m−3) when compared to southern transects. The highest abundance was reported in the shelf waters (84 no 10 m−3) and lowest in coastal waters (14 no 10 m−3) (Fig. 5d). Mesosagitta sp. followed by Flaccisagitta and Serratosagitta dominated the chaetognath community. Other chaetognath genus included, Ferosagitta, Sagitta, Decipisagitta and Aidanosagitta. Genus Krohnitta and Pterosagitta were entirely absent from these region. Thus, it can be observed that the major chaetognath genus dominating the upwelled waters included, Flaccisagitta, Pterosagitta, Serratosagitta, Sagitta, Krohnitta and Ferosagitta with Flaccisagitta enflata and Sagitta bipunctata forming the major species in upwelled waters. The genus Mesosagitta dominated the non-upwelled waters of northern transects. Other chaetognath genus apart from Mesosagitta, were also present in the northern transects but in lower abundance indicating their higher affinity towards upwelled waters.
The BEST analysis (statistical analysis linking biotic patterns to environmental variables), of various environmental and biological parameters influencing the distribution of chaetognaths revealed that temperature, dissolved oxygen and abundance of copepods as a source of food are the major factors that determine their distribution pattern. Temperature showed a negative correlation whereas dissolved oxygen and copepod abundance showed a positive correlation towards the numerical abundance of chaetognaths. The abundance of chaetognaths was positively correlated with copepod abundance (at a significant level of 0.05). The high abundance of chaetognath in offshore waters of 8° 28′ N can be related to the subsurface cold waters and also high abundance of copepod (16,327 no 10 m−3). Among the chaetognaths, genus Flaccisagitta observed a strong positive correlation with copepod abundance (significant at 0.01 level). Principal component analysis (PCA) of various physicochemical parameters in different stations of the study area showed that PC1 and PC2 clearly defined the cumulative variations between the study areas by 69.1% and an addition of PC3 contributed a cumulative variation of 83% (Table 1). The analysis indicated the relationship between numerical abundance of chaetognaths with copepod abundance, preference to low SST and high dissolved oxygen (Fig. 7).
Discussion
Eastern Arabian Sea ecosystem bordering the west coast of India is environmentally unique owing to the reversing monsoon patterns and accordingly driven biophysical responses. Intense biological production occurs in South Eastern Arabian Sea (SEAS) along the southwest coast of India in response to summer monsoon upwelling extending from May–June to September (Banse and English 2000). The vertical flux of inorganic nutrients results in high biological productivity in the region (Bhattathiri et al. 1996; Ryther et al. 1966; Qasim 1982).
Winds during summer monsoon are generally south west over most of the Arabian Sea and become northerly along the west coast of India. With the onset of the summer monsoon, weak to moderate upwelling occurs off the Kanyakumari coast (8° N) that spreads northwards along the west coast as monsoon advances and reaches up to Goa coast during peak monsoon (Smitha et al. 2008). During the present study, upwelling signatures are evident along the South Eastern Arabian Sea. The low surface water temperature (24.5 °C) prevalent along the region and an upsloping of 24 °C isotherm from 75 m to surface waters, evident along 8° 28′ N (off Thiruvananthapuram) indicates intense upwelling along the region (Fig. 2a). Upwelling signatures were prevalent along 9° 56′ N (off Kochi) (Fig. 2b) with an upsloping of 24 °C isotherm to the subsurface waters (20 m). Along 11° 21′ N upwelling signatures (Fig. 2c) were confined to coastal waters. In the region offshore and further north towards 15° 30′ N spring inter-monsoon condition with high SST and highly stratified waters prevailed indicating the absence of upwelling (Fig. 2d).
The Sea Surface Salinity (SSS) in the study area shows a decreasing trend from the south (off Thiruvananthapuram) to the north (off Goa) along the coastal waters (34.73 to 32.43 psu). Dissolved oxygen decreased from 8° 28′ N to 15° 30′ N (4.85 ml L−1–5.17 ml L−1) along the coastal waters. However, there was a considerable decrease in the dissolved oxygen concentrations along the coastal waters off Kochi. Nitrate concentration in surface waters of Arabian Sea is considerably higher during the summer monsoon upwelling and winter monsoon convective mixing (Prasannakumar and Prasad 1996). During the present study the surface concentrations of nitrate along the upwelled waters reached a maximum of 3.25 µmol L−1 along the coastal waters of 8° 28′ N and ~ 2.88 µmol L−1 along coastal waters of 9° 56′ N with a decreased concentration (2.36 µmol L−1) in the non-upwelled waters (15° 30′ N). Maximum chlorophyll a concentration was observed along the coastal waters of southern transects (regions of upwelling). Chlorophyll a concentration peaked along the coastal waters of 8° 28′ N (~ 10.84 mg m−3) followed by 9° 56′ N (6.02 mg m−3). Although, highly stratified waters (non-upwelled waters) were observed along 15°30′N, chlorophyll a concentration (6.31 mg m−3) was comparatively high along the region. Previously high primary production with chlorophyll a observed in the region was attributed towards the riverine influx through Zuari-Mandovi estuary adjoining the coast of Goa (Gurumurthy et al. 2017).
Zooplankton plays a pivotal role in the shaping of the marine ecosystem. The region south of 20°N in the eastern Arabian sea was reported to have high zooplankton biomass (Nair et al.1998) and it is more within the area of upwelling (Smith et al. 1998b) during the southwest monsoon season (Ashjian et al. 2002; Smith et al. 1998; Wishner et al. 1998). In the present survey, high average zooplankton biomass (0.41 ± 0.4 ml m−3) was observed along 8° 28′ N (off Thiruvananthapuram) with high values towards the shelf and offshore waters (Fig. 4a). This can be attributed to the coastal upwelling with offshore extension and high phytoplankton production. Zooplankton biomass was also recorded to be high along the coastal upwelling region 9° 56′ N (Fig. 4b) and 11° 21′ N (Fig. 4c). However, further north (15° 30′ N) biomass was considerably low along the coastal as well as the offshore region (Fig. 4d).
The biomass of zooplankton varied significantly between upwelled and non-upwelled waters with comparatively high values along the upwelled areas. Zooplankton taxa studied during IIOE showed a pattern of increased abundance during the southwest monsoon season characterized by coastal upwelling (Panikkar 1969; Panikkar and Rao 1973). Copepods are numerically dominant in the mesozooplanktonic community (50–88% of total), both along the coastal and oceanic waters of Eastern Arabian Sea (Kasturirangan et al. 1973; Nair et al. 1978; Kumari and Achuthanktty 1989). Other mesozooplankton groups include tunicates, ostracods and chaetognaths. During the present study, also copepods (80%) dominated the mesozooplankton community. However, there was an abundance of cladocerans (85%) along coastal waters off Kochi and fish eggs along the shelf waters off Calicut (40%). In general, copepods were followed by cladocerans and chaetognaths in abundance. Other mesozooplankton groups included tunicates, fish larvae, amphipods, polychaete larvae, doliolum, echinoderm larvae, pteropod and lucifer. Although numerical abundance was greater along the upwelling regions, average mesozooplankton diversity was observed to be more along the offshore waters.
Chaetognath occupies a prominent position in zooplankton community structure (Reeve 1971) and is included in the top five most abundant zooplankton groups in the ocean (Alvarino 1964). Their close relationship with certain environmental variables and their species-specific horizontal and vertical distribution make them excellent indicators of water masses (Bieri 1959) and distribution pattern of some species is associated with certain hydrographic event like upwelling. The present study during the early phase of summer monsoon upwelling, observed differences in chaetognath community along the upwelled and non-upwelled waters of South Eastern Arabian Sea. The abundance of chaetognaths was comparatively high along the upwelled waters whereas diversity was more in the non-upwelled waters. Hence according the propagation of upwelling northward, high abundance and low diversity was observed in the southern upwelled transects and vice versa in the northern non upwelled region (Fig. 6). Nearly, ten genera of chaetognaths were identified, mainly, Flaccisagitta, Serratosagitta, Mesosagitta, Pterosagitta, Ferosagitta etc. The genus Flaccisagitta was observed to be the dominant one present along the SEAS during the study period.
The major environmental and biological factors that determine the chaetognath distribution pattern according to BEST analysis included temperature, dissolved oxygen and abundance of copepods. According to Kusum et al. (2014), most chaetognath species shows a negative correlation towards temperature and positive correlation towards dissolved oxygen. The high abundance of copepods resulting from the upwelling induced primary production in the Indian Ocean was observed to positively influence the abundance of chaetognaths that prey upon the copepods (Madhupratap et al. 1990). The present study also corroborates with these observations. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the relationship between various hydrographical parameters of the study area (Fig. 7) observed lower SST, higher copepod abundance and high dissolved oxygen in upwelled waters showing high chaetognath abundance.
Along the southern transects (off Thiruvananthapuram, off Kochi and off Calicut) the prevalent low temperature and abundance of copepod support the high abundance of chaetognaths. Flaccisagitta, being the most dominant chaetognaths genus, was present mainly in the upwelled coastal waters of SEAS, and their abundance decreased towards the north as well as open ocean waters where indications of upwelling were less. Pterosagitta, Serratosagitta, Sagitta, Krohnitta and Ferosagitta were the other major genera observed in the upwelled waters. Flaccisagitta enflata and Sagitta bipunctata were significantly high in upwelling waters. However, Mesosagitta sp. was mainly observed towards the non-upwelled waters of SEAS.
The present study unveils the community structure of zooplankton with emphasis to chaetognaths along the SEAS during the southwest monsoon. Upwelling signatures were evident mainly towards the southern part of SEAS and were characterized by high mesozooplankton biomass and chaetognaths abundance. Major zooplankton groups identified were copepods, ostracods, fish eggs, chaetognaths, amphipods, etc. Chaetognath observed high abundance in the upwelled waters; however, diversity was comparatively high in the non-upwelled waters. Nearly, ten genera of chaetognaths were identified, mainly, Flaccisagitta, Serratosagitta, Mesosagitta, Pterosagitta, Ferosagitta etc. The genus Flaccisagitta dominated the upwelled waters of south and genus Mesosagitta dominated the non-upwelled waters of the north. Also, the distribution pattern of chaetognaths along the SEAS was influenced by various environmental and biological factors such as temperature, dissolved oxygen and copepod abundance. Chaetognaths share a major part of zooplankton composition of the productive waters, and the community structure of chaetognaths is important to understand the food web dynamics of upwelled waters along the Southeastern Arabian Sea.
Data availability
The manuscript has no associated data.
References
Alvarino A (1964) The chaetognatha of the monsoon expedition in the Indian Ocean. Pac Sci 28:336–348
Aravindakshan PN, Sakthivel M (1973) The location of cephalopod nurseries in the Indian Ocean. In Handbook to the international zooplankton collections, vol V. National Institute of Oceanography, Cochin, pp 70–75
Ashjian CJ, Smith SL, Flagg CN, Idrisi N (2002) Distribution, annual cycle, and vertical migration of acoustically derived biomass in the Arabian Sea during 1994–1995. Deep-Sea Res II 49:2377–2402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00041-3
Atkinson A (1996) Subantarctic copepods in an oceanic, low chlorophyll environment: ciliate predation, low food selectivity and impact on prey populations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 130:85–96
Azam F, Fenchel T, Field JG, Grey JS, Meyer-Reil LA, Thingstad F (1983) The ecological role of water-column microbes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 10:257–263
Banse K, English DC (2000) Geographical differences in seasonality of CZCS-derived phytoplankton pigment in the Arabian Sea for 1978–1986. Deep-Sea Res Part II 47(7–8):1623–1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(99)00157-5
Bhattathiri PMA, Pant A, Sawant S, Gauns M, Matondkar SGP, Mohanraju R (1996) Phytoplankton production and chlorophyll distribution in the eastern and central Arabian Sea. Curr Sci 71(11):857–862
Bieri R (1959) The distribution of the planktonic Chaetognatha in the Pacific and their relationship to the water masses. Limnol Oceanogr 4(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1959.4.1.0001
Bieri R (1991) Systematics of the chaetognatha. In: Bone Q, Kapp H, Pierrot-Bults AC (eds) The biology of chaetognaths. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 122–136
Brinton E, Gopalakrishnan K (1973) The distribution of Indian Ocean euphausiids. In: Zeitzschel B, Gerlach SA (eds) The biology of the Indian Ocean. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 357–382
Brock J, McClain C, Luther M, Hay W (1991) The phytoplankton bloom in the northwestern Arabian Sea during the southwest monsoon of 1979. J Geophys Res 96:20623–20642. https://doi.org/10.1029/91JC01711
Casanova JP, Nair VR (1999) A new species of the genus Sagitta (phylum Chaetognatha) from the Agatti lagoon (Laccadive Archipelago, Indian Ocean) with comments on endemism. Ind J Mar Sci 28(2):169–172
Chacko PI (1950) Marine plankton from waters around the Krusadai Island. Proc Indian Acad Sci Sect B 31(3):162–174
Cheney J (1985) Spatial and temporal abundance patterns of oceanic chaetognaths in the western North Atlantic—II Vertical distributions and migrations. Deep Sea Res Part A 32(9):1061–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(85)90062-7
Feigenbaum DL, Maris RC (1984) Feeding in the Chaetognatha. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 22:343–392
Ganapati PN, Rao TSS (1954) Studies on the Chaetognatha off the Visakhapatnam coast, Part I. Seasonal fluctuations in relation to salinity and temperature. Andhra Univ Mem Oceanogr (Ser 49) 1:143–150
George PC (1952) A systematic account of the chaetognatha of the Indian coastal waters, with observations on their seasonal fluctuations along the Malabar Coast. Proc Natl Inst Sci India 18(6):657–689
George J (1969) A preliminary report on the distribution and abundance of planktonic ostracods in the Indian Ocean. In Proceedings of the symposium on Indian Ocean. National Institute of Sciences of India, New Delhi, pp 641–647
Gibbons MJ (1992) Diel feeding and vertical migration of Sagitta serratodentata Krohntasmanica Thomson (Chaetognatha) in the southern Benguela. J Plankton Res 14(2):249–259. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/14.2.249
Giesecke R, González HE (2004) Feeding of Sagitta enflata and vertical distribution of chaetognaths in relation to low oxygen concentrations. J Plankton Res 26(4):475–486. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbh039
Gopalakrishnan K, Brinton E (1969) Preliminary observations on the distribution of Euphausiacea from the International Indian Ocean Expedition. In Proceedings of the symposium on Indian Ocean. National Institute of Sciences of India, New Delhi, pp 594–611
Goswami SC, Sarupria JS, Bhargava RMS (1992) Zooplankton standing stock assessment and fishery resources in the Indian Seas. In: Desai BN (ed) Oceanography of the Indian Ocean. Oxford & IBH Published Company, New Delhi, pp 217–226
Grasshoff K, Ehrhardt M, Kremling K, Almgren T (1983) Methods of seawater analysis. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, p 419
Gray P (1961) Encyclopedia of biological science. Reinhold Publishing Corp, New York
Gurumurthy GP, Tripti M, Riotte J, Prakyath R, Balakrishna K (2017) Impact of water-particle interactions on molybdenum budget in humid tropical rivers and estuaries: insights from Nethravati, Gurupur and Mandovi river systems. Chem Geol 450:44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.12.008
Harris R, Lenz J, Skjoldal HR, Huntley M (2000) ICES zooplankton methodology manual. Academic, San Diego
John CC (1933) Sagitta of the Madras coast. Government Press, Superintendent, pp 1–10
John CC (1937) Seasonal variations in the distribution of Sagitta of the Madras coast. Rec Indian Mus 39(1):83–97
Kasturirangan LR, Saraswathy M, Gopalakrishnan TC (1973) Distribution of copepoda in the Indian Ocean. In: Zeitzschel B, Gerlach SA (eds) Biology of the Indian Ocean. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 331–333
Krey J, Babenerd B (1976) Phytoplankton production: atlas of the international Indian Ocean expedition. Institutfür Meereskundean der Universität Kiel.
Kumari LK, Achuthanktty CT (1989) Standing stock and biogeochemical composition of zooplankton in the northeastern Arabian Sea. Indian Journal of Marine Science 18:103–105
Kusum KK (2012) Ecology of Chaetognaths in the Indian EEZ. Ph.D Thesis, Cochin University of Science and Technology.
Kusum KK, Vineetha G, Raveendran TV, Muraleedharan KR, Biju A, Achuthankutty CT (2014) Influence of upwelling on the distribution of chaetognath (zooplankton) in the oxygen deficient zone of the eastern Arabian Sea. Cont Shelf Res 78:16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2014.01.005
Lee C, Jones B, Brink K, Fischer A (2000) The upper ocean response to monsoonal forcing in the Arabian Sea: seasonal and spatial variability. Deep-Sea Res II 47:1177–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(99)00141-1
Madhupratap M, Nair SS, Haridas P, Padmavati G (1990) Response of zooplankton to physical changes in the environment: coastal upwelling along the central west coast of India. J Coast Res 6:413–426
Madhupratap M, Kumar SP, Bhattathiri PMA, Kumar MD, Raghukumar S, Nair KKC, Ramaiah N (1996) Mechanism of the biological response to winter cooling in the northeastern Arabian Sea. Nature 384(6609):549. https://doi.org/10.1038/384549a0
Madhupratap M, Nair KNV, Venugopal P, Gauns M, Haridas P, Gopalakrishnan TC, Nair KKC (2004) Arabian Sea oceanography and fisheries. In: Somvanshi VS (ed) Large marine ecosystems: exploration and exploitation for sustainable development and conservation on fish stocks. Fishery Survey of India, pp 482–491
McCreary JP, Kohler KE, Hood RR, Olson DB (1996) A four component ecosystem model of biological activity in the Arabian Sea. Prog Oceanogr 37:193–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6611(96)00005-5
Nair VR (1969) A preliminary report on the biomass of chaetognaths in the Indian Ocean comparing the south-west and north-east monsoon periods. In Proceedings of the symposium on Indian Ocean. National Institute of Sciences of India, New Delhi, pp 747–752.
Nair VR, Rao TSS (1973) Chaetognaths of the Arabian Sea. The biology of the Indian Ocean. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 293–317
Nair KKC, Jacob PG, Kumaran S (1973) Distribution and abundance of planktonic amphipods in the Indian Ocean. In: Zeitzschel B, Gerlach SA (eds) The biology of the Indian Ocean. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 349–356
Nair VR, Peter G, Paulinose VT (1978) Zooplankton studies in the Indian Ocean II. From the Arabian Sea during post monsoon period. Mahasagar 11:35–43
Nair VR, Mustafa S, Metha P, Govindan K, Ram MJ, Gajbhiye SN (1998) Biological characteristics of the Vashishti estuary, Maharashtra. 1ndian. J. Mar. Sci. 27:310–316
Nair VR, Terazaki M, Jayalakshmy KV (2002) Abundance and community structure of chaetognaths in the northern Indian Ocean. Plankton Biology and Ecology 49(1):27–37
Nair VR, Kusum GKKR, Nair M (2015) The distribution of the chaetognath population and its interaction with environmental characteristics in the Bay of Bengal and the Arabian Sea. Marine Biology Research 11(3):269–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2014.914224
Panikkar NK (1969) Fishery resources of the Indian Ocean. In Proceedings of the symposium on Indian Ocean, National Institute of Sciences of India, New Delhi, pp811–832
Panikkar NK (1970) Distribution of Copepoda and decapod larvae in the Indian Ocean. International Indian Ocean Plankton Atlas, Volume II, Fascicle 1. Indian Ocean Biological Center, Kochi, pp 15
Panikkar NK, Rao TSS (1973) Zooplankton investigation in Indian waters and the role of the Indian Ocean Biological Centre. In Handbook to the international zooplankton collections, vol V. National Institute of Oceanography 5, Kochi, pp111–162
Parsons TR, Maita Y, Lalli CM (1984) A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis. Pergamon Press, New York
Pearre S Jr (1982) Feeding by Chaetognatha: aspects of inter-and intra-specific predation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 7(1):33–45
Peter G (1969a) A preliminary report on the general distribution and variation in abundance of the planktonic polychaetes in the Indian Ocean. In Proceedings of the symposium on Indian Ocean. National Institute of Sciences of India, New Delhi, pp 718–726
Peter KJ (1969b) Preliminary report on the density of fish eggs and larvae of the Indian Ocean. In Proceedings of the symposium Indian Ocean. National Institute of Sciences of India, New Delhi, pp 854–863
Pitchaikani SJ, Lipton AP (2015) Seasonal variation of zooplankton and pelagic fish catch in the fishing grounds off Tiruchendur coast, Gulf of Mannar. India Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 15(2):89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2015.04.003
Prasannakumar S, Prasad TG (1996) Winter cooling in the northern Arabian Sea. Curr Sci 71:834–841
Prasannakumar S, Madhuprathap M, Dileepkumar M, Muraleedharan PM, de Souza SN, Gauns M, Sarma VVSS (2001) High biological productivity in the central Arabian Sea during summer monsoon driven by Ekman pumping and lateral advection. Curr Sci 81:1633–1638
Qasim SZ (1982) Oceanography of the northern Arabian Sea. Deep-Sea Res 29:1041–1068
Rao TSS (1958a) Studies on chaetognatha in the Indian seas Part II-the chaetognatha of the Lawson’s Bay, Waltair. Andhra Univ Memo Oceanogr 3:137–146
Rao TSS (1958b) Studies on chaetognatha in the Indian seas Part IV-distribution in relation to currents. Andhra Univer Mem Oceanogr 2:164–167
Rao TSS, Ganapati PN (1958) Studies on Chaetognatha in the Indian seas Part III. Andhra Univ Mem Oceanogr 2:147–163
Reeve MR (1971) Deadly arrow-worm. Sea. Frontiers 17:175–183
Russell F (1935) On the value of certain plankton animals as indicators of water movements in the English Channel and North Sea. J Marine Biol Assoc UK 20(2):309–332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400045239
Russell F (1939) Hydrographical and biological conditions in the North Sea as indicated by plankton organisms. ICES J Mar Sci 14(2):171–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/14.2.171
Ryther JH, Hall JR, Pease AK, Bakun A, Jones MM (1966) Primary organic production in relation to the chemistry and hydrography of the western Indian Ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 11(3):371–380. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1966.11.3.0371
ShannonLV, Pillar SC (1986) The Benguela ecosystem Part III-Plankton. In: Barnes M (ed) Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 24. Aberdeen University Press, pp 65–170.
Smith S, Roman M, Prusova I, Wishner K, Gowing M, Codispoti LA, Flagg C (1998) Seasonal response of zooplankton to monsoonal reversals in the Arabian Sea. Deep-Sea Res Part II 45(10–11):2369–2403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(98)00075-7
Smitha BR, Sanjeevan VN, Vimalkumar KG, Revichandran C (2008) On the upwelling off the southern tip and along the west coast of India. J Coastal Res 24(sp3):95–102. https://doi.org/10.2112/06-0779.1
Terazaki M (1989) Distribution of chaetognaths in the Australian sector of the Southern Ocean during the BIOMASS SIBEX cruise (KH-83—4). Proc NIPR Symp Polar Biol 2:51–60
Tokioka T (1965) The taxonomical outline of chaetognatha. Public Seto Marine Biol Lab 12:335–357
Ulloa R, Palma S, Silva N (2004) Relationship between spatial distribution of chaetognaths and oceanographic conditions off Concepción Bay, Chile. Deep Sea Res Part II 51(6–9):537–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2004.05.002
Varadarajan S, Chacko PI (1943) On the arrow worms of Krusadai. Proc Nat Inst Sci India 9:245–248
Vega-Pérez LA, Schinke KP (2011) Checklist of chaetognatha phyllum from São Paulo State, Brazil. Biota Neotrop 11:541–550. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032011000500021
Wishner KF, Gowing M, Gelfman MC (1998) Mesozooplankton biomass in the upper l000m in the Arabian Sea: overall seasonal and geographical patterns and relationship gradients. Deep Sea Res II 45:2405–2432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(98)00078-2
Young DK, Kindle J (1994) Physical processes affecting availability of dissolved silicate for diatom production in the Arabian Sea. J Geophys Res 99:22619–22632. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JC01449
Zhang JZ, Fischer CJ (2006) A simplified resorcinol method for direct spectrophotometric determination of nitrate in seawater. Mar Chem 99(1–4):220–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2005.09.008
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the Centre for Marine Living Resources and Ecology, Ministry of Earth Science, for providing the facilities to conduct the research. We also thank crew members of FORV Sagar Sampada for the help rendered during the cruise period.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AP wrote the manuscript with input from LCT. AP conducted the field study. AP and LCT contributed to the taxonomic identifications. SBN and KBP supervised this study and provided research materials. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
No animal testing was performed during this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Purushothaman, A., Thomas, L.C., Nandan, S.B. et al. Influence of upwelling on the chaetognath community along the Southeastern Arabian Sea. Wetlands Ecol Manage 29, 731–743 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-020-09773-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-020-09773-6