1 Introduction

Dyes pose a significant risk owing to their non-biodegradability, toxicity, and carcinogenicity (Suzuki et al., 2020) and impacting humans by affecting the ecosystem and ground water resources (Al-Tohamy et al., 2022; Manzoor & Sharma, 2020). Essentially, dyes are intentionally designed to resist biodegradation to prevent the vanishing of colors over time (Zaheer et al., 2019). Synthetic dyes are extensively used in many industries such as textile, dyeing, pharmaceutical, paper printing, color photography, food, cosmetics, and other process industries (Samsami et al., 2020; Silva et al., 2021). It is reported that over \(7\times {10}^{5}\) tons of dyes and pigments, including more than 100,000 commercially available dyes, are produced worldwide every year (Perera, 2019). Due to the toxicity, biodegradability, and persistent nature of these dyes, their elimination from wastewater has become an important issue in recent years (Rashid et al., 2021; Santhosh et al., 2016). There are only a few effective technologies capable of cleaning dye-containing wastewater, through adsorption and biological methods, as well as advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) (Hossen et al., 2022; Thekkedath et al., 2022). In contrast to adsorption and biological methods, AOPs are efficient, low-cost, and applicable to small and large-scale industries. Among the AOPs, the heterogeneous photocatalytic process employing TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) as photocatalsysts is a promising technology that has shown efficient dye removal from wastewater (Al-Mamun et al., 2019; Iervolino et al., 2020). Unfortunately, the practical application of unmodified TiO2 nanoparticles is limited; because of the wide bandgap (3.0–3.2 eV), it is mostly active under the ultra-violet irradiation (wavelength < 410 nm), which is less than 5% of the total solar spectrum and, thus, it lacks the ability to take advantage of using the visible light provided by the sun. Moreover, the photocatalytic efficiency is reduced by the rapid electron–hole pair recombination due to the low quantum efficiency of TiO2 (Khasawneh & Palaniandy, 2021; Rehman et al., 2009). To overcome these limitations, doping TiO2 with metals and coupling it with other semiconductors have been developed, which effectively improve the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 under UV, visible and direct sun irradiations (Haider et al., 2019; Nasr et al., 2018).

Nguyen et al. (Nguyen et al., 2018) used palladium-doped TiO2 to enhance photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue (MB) and methyl orange (MO) under UV- irradiation, achieving 99.4% and 92.6% degradation of MB and MO using 0.5 wt.% and 0.75 wt.% Pd-TiO2, respectively, after 2 h. McManamon et al. (McManamon et al., 2015) reported the synthesis of S-doped TiO2 nanoparticles through a facile synthesis route, which effectively narrowed the bandgap of TiO2 from 3.2 to 1.7 eV. It was observed that malachite green (MG) dye the optimum S-doped TiO2 (20 mg/L degradation) surpassed undoped TiO2 (16 mg/L degradation) and commercially available P25 (degradation), under the same conditions. Recently, Han et al. (Han et al., 2018) studied the photocatalytic degradation of acid orange 7 (AO7) using Fe+3 doped TiO2 nanoparticles under different irradiation sources, UV, visible and solar lights. The prepared doped catalyst showed a slight improvement under UV-irradiation compared with undoped TiO2, while a huge improvement was observed under visible and solar irradiations. By using UV-irradiation, they achieved complete degradation of 50 mg/L AO7 after 2 h using 100 mg/L of 3 wt.% Fe+3 doped TiO2. Using visible light, 25 mg/L AO7 was completely degraded after 6 h of visible light irradiation using 500 mg/L of 2 wt.% Fe+3 doped TiO2, while only 5 mg/L AO7 was degraded using undoped TiO2 under the same conditions.

In this study, the enhancement of the photocatalytic degradation was investigated by coupling TiO2 NPs with iron-nickel oxide (Fe2NiO4) nanoparticles under UV-irradiation. The process conditions were optimized for the coupling ratio and pH of the solution. Since azo dyes account for more than half of all dyes produced annually and in common use (Chung, 2016), Acid Orange 7 was selected as test pollutant for the degradation process as an effective model representing industrial wastewater containing azo dyes.

2 Experiment

2.1 Chemicals

Acid Orange 7 (AO7) (C16H11N2NaO4S) (Fig. 1), TiO2 nanoparticles (anatase-phase crystal structure with an average particle size of about 25 nm), and iron-nickel oxide nanoparticles (Fe2NiO4 NPs with an average particle size of about 50 nm) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) reagents: Potassium dichromate, Mercury (II) sulfate, sulfuric acid were purchased from Scharlau Chemicals. pH adjustment chemicals: Sodium hydroxide was purchased from Daejung reagents and chemicals, and hydrochloric acid 37% was purchased from Carlo Erba reagents. All chemicals were of analytical grade and were used without further purification.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The chemical structure of the AO7in (a) Azo and (b) Hydrazone forms

2.2 Preparation of TiO2/Fe2NiO4 Nanocomposite

TiO2/Fe2NiO4 nanocomposite was prepared using the solid-state-blending in a particular ration (Table 1) using a pestle in an agate mortar for 30 min at room temperature (25 ℃). Afterward, the blended TiO2/Fe2NiO4 nanocomposite was heated at 200 ℃ for 1 h, promoting the TiO2/Fe2NiO4 nanocomplex coupling.

Table 1 Blending ratio of the prepared 100TiO2:xFe2NiO4 nanocomposite, where x is the absolute weight of Fe2NiO4 with respect to 100 folds of the absolute weight of TiO2 to get the values in weight percentage (wt.%)

2.3 TiO2/Fe2NiO4 Nanocomposite Characterization

An X-ray diffractometer (Ultima IV, Rigaku) was used to identify the crystalline structure of the samples using Cu Kα radiation. The size and the morphology of the TiO2/Fe2NiO4 nanocomposite were evaluated using Quanta FEG 450 scanning electron microscopes (SEM). Zeta Sizer Nano-ZS90 (Malvern Panalytical) was used to determine the size distribution of the photocatalytic nanocomposite dispersed in water.

2.4 Photocatalytic Degradation Experiments and Characterizations

A customized photocatalytic reactor (model TL-GHX-II, China) (Fig. 2a and b) was employed for photocatalytic removal of AO7 in an aqueous solution. It was designed in such a way that the radiation source is immersed within the solution, allowing for maximum energy transfer from the source to the solution. The reactor has a maximum volume of 2 L and is connected to a chiller for lamp cooling. The power of the UV lamps is up to 1000 W. The UV–irradiation is emitted using a mercury lamp that produces light with maximum intensity at a wavelength of 365 nm.

Fig. 2
figure 2

(a) A schematic of the photocatalytic-glass-reactor including the safety cabinet-UV-shielding, control panel, UV-power, hot plate including the magnetic stirrer plate and PTFE coated magnets, double walled-dewar-glass and water cooling system. (b) The setup of the customized photocatalytic reactor assembly, (c) the enlargement of the reactor and (d) the glass-photocatalytic reactor with UV-lamp disassembled

The photocatalytic degradation of 50 mg/L AO7 aqueous solutions in 1.8 L of water using TiO2, Fe2NiO4, and TiO2:xFe2NiO4 nanocomposites was investigated. In this study, an optimum catalyst loading of 100 mg/L was used based on the literature recommendation (Santhosh et al., 2016). Reaction conditions were optimized in terms of TiO2/Fe2NiO4 NPs coupling ratio and pH. Polyacrylic acid (PAA) polymer was used in 300 mg/1.8 L water as a coating agent for nanoparticles to improve their suspension stability and prevent the particle agglomeration. Then, the desired quantity of catalyst was added to the solution and stirred for 15 min. After that, the solution was sonicated using a bath (Elmasonic P) for 10 min at low frequency (37 Hz) and power of 500 Watt. Afterwards, the solution was stirred for another 30 min, and immediately, 50 mg/L AO7 was added. The solution acidity was adjusted to pH = 3 and was stirred in the dark for 45 min, allowing adsorption of AO7 onto the catalyst surface to take place.

For UV–Vis absorbance measurements, samples were taken at time intervals (5–30 min), filtered using a syringe filter (Filter-Bio PTFE-L), and direct UV–Vis absorbance spectra were acquired through a spectrophotometer (Beckman DU520). Simultaneously, from the sample batch allocated for UV–Vis experiments, the chemical oxygen demand (COD) was determined using the standard dichromate method. Prepared digestion solution (dichromate) and sulfuric acid reagents were added in the proper amounts to the samples, including a blank. Subsequently, the solution was incubated at 150 °C for 120 min in a COD digester (thermo-reactor RD 125, Lovibond), being the COD measurements performed using a spectrophotometer (MultiDirect, Lovibond). The pH was measured using a Mettler Toledo SevenGo Duo pH/Cond meter SG23 pH meter.

The electrical energy consumption of the photocatalytic reactions was determined by electric energy per order (EEO), which represents the energy in kilowatt-hours (kWh) required to remove contaminant X by one order of magnitude (90%) in 1 m3 of contaminated water. The EEO value was calculated using the following equation (Bolton et al., 2001):

$$E_{EO}=\frac{P\cdot t\cdot1000}{V\cdot60\cdot ln(\frac{C_o}{C_f})}$$

where EEO is the electric energy per order (kWh/m3); P is the nominal power of the light source (kW) (500 W mercury lamp); t is the irradiation time (minutes) (25 min to achieve 90% removal); C0 and Cf are the AO7 initial and final concentrations (mg/L), and V is the solution volume (1.8 L).

X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD, Malvern Panalytical Ltd, Malvern, UK) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI Quanta FEG 450) were used to investigate the structural and morphological properties of pure TiO2 NPs, pure Fe2NiO4 NPs, and 100TiO2:xFe2NiO4 NPs (x = 2 wt.%) and x = 3 wt.%) deposited on silicon substrate. Moreover, SEM–EDX (Phenom Pro/ProX G6; nanoScience instruments) were used to acquire micrographs and average energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDX) measurements for pure TiO2 NPs, pure Fe2NiO4 NPs, and 100TiO2:xFe2NiO4 NPs (x = 2 wt.% and x = 3 wt.%) deposited on conductive carbon adhesive tape. Optical properties including transmittance and reflectance spectra and other corresponding parameters were investigated using a double-beam UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-3900H) with a total internal sphere.

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 X-ray Diffraction

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of pure TiO2 NPs, pure Fe2NiO4 NPs, and TiO2/Fe2NiO4 nanocomposite samples at 2θ = 20°–90° are shown in Fig. 3. XRD pattern of pure TiO2 and its composites exhibit main peaks at 2θ = 25.00, 37.56°, 47.76°, 53.63°, 54.86°, and 62.32° corresponding to the planes (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), (213), respectively (Ijadpanah-Saravy et al., 2014), which matches with the anatase phase TiO2. It should be noted that the Bragg positions and relative intensities of the diffraction peaks are consistent with the standard pattern for JCPDS Card No. (21–1272) and with reported literature on TiO2 (Robotti et al., 2016). The TiO2 rutile phase was not observed; this confirms the well-crystallized single anatase phase of TiO2 used throughout this study. As noticed from Fig. 3, combining Fe2NiO4 NPs in small fractions with TiO2 NPs resulted in additional lower-intensity diffraction peaks, indicative of the low Fe2NiO4 content in the coupled samples. In addition, the intensities of the major peaks of TiO2 NPs decreased with increasing the coupling ratio of Fe2NiO4 NPs, while, in the coupled samples, an increase in intensities was observed. Finally, new peaks at 2θ = 37.3° corresponding to Fe2NiO4 (311) were observed, indicating the presence of iron in the coupled TiO2 NPs with higher amounts of Fe2NiO4 NPs (Habibi & Fakhri, 2017).

Fig. 3
figure 3

XRD patterns of TiO2/Fe2NiO4 NPs with different coupling ratios of Fe2NiO4 NPs

Crystal parameters such as crystallite size (D), microstrain \(\langle \varepsilon \rangle\), the density of dislocations (\(\delta\)), total internal stress (\(\sigma\)), and strain energy density (\({E}_{d}\)) were calculated from the XRD data according to the formulas listed in Table 2 (Al-Bataineh et al., 2019, 2020a; Alsaad et al., 2020). The crystallite size of the pure TiO2 NPs is 12 nm. The largest (14 nm) and smallest (11 nm) crystallite size are registered for x = 2 wt.% and x = 3 wt.%, respectively. The microstrain shows opposite trend of the crystallite size and the inverse dependence of the microstrain on the crystallite size is related to the reduction in the volume occupied by the atoms inside the joint crystalline structure. As a result, the latter observation leads to an increase in the unit cell volume, which causes in-plane positions shifts and dislocations (Horiuchi et al., 2010), playing a significant role in the materials strength and ductility (Akl & Hassanien, 2015). δ characterizes the crystalline clusters-spaces and their agglomerations since a reduction in δ indicates an enhancement in the crystallization and lessening of the free spaces (Akl & Hassanien, 2015; Williamson & Smallman, 1956). δ of pure TiO2 NPs is \(7.15\times {10}^{11}\) lines/cm2 and, likewise the microstrain, the highest δ of TiO2/Fe2NiO4 NPs was at 3 wt.%, and the lowest δ was at 2 wt.%. The values of the total internal stress and strain energy density of pure TiO2 NPs are \(4.99\times {10}^{8}\) N/m2 and \(8.25\times {10}^{5}\) J/m3, respectively.

Table 2 Crystallographic parameters of TiO2/Fe2NiO4 NPs with different coupling ratios of Fe2NiO4 NPs

3.2 SEM Analysis

Scaning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of pure TiO2 NPs, pure Fe2NiO4 NPs, and 100TiO2:xFe2NiO4 NPs (x = 2 wt.%) and x = 3 wt.%) deposited on silicon substrate are demonstrated in Fig. 4ad. The size distributions were calculated statistically by measuring the diameters randomly in the micrograph. TiO2 NPs in 100TiO2:2Fe2NiO4 and 100TiO2:3Fe2NiO4 nanocomposites are spherical, with size distributions between 15 and 25 nm while for pure Fe2NiO4, are also spherical with sizes in the range of 30–50 nm.

Fig. 4
figure 4

SEM micrographs and size analysis of (a) pure TiO2 NPs, (b) 100TiO2:2Fe2NiO4, (c) 100TiO2:3Fe2NiO4 and (d) pure Fe2NiO4 NPs

Additionally, in Fig. 5, SEM micrographs and average energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDX) measurements were acquired for pure TiO2 NPs, pure Fe2NiO4 NPs, and 100TiO2:xFe2NiO4 NPs (x = 2 wt.% and x = 3 wt.%) deposited on conductive carbon adhesive tape.

Fig. 5
figure 5

SEM micrographs, EDAX, and elemental analysis of (a) pure TiO2 NPs, (b) 100TiO2:2Fe2NiO4, (c) 100TiO2:3Fe2NiO4 and (d) pure Fe2NiO4 NPs

EDX measurements and respective analysis were performed on the entire area displayed in the SEM micrographs. The EDX results are in agreement with the preparation approach (2 and 3 wt.%). The elemental carbon in the EDX analysis is from the conductive carbon adhesive tapes substrate and the carbon percent is high according to the powder coverage of the substrate, while the elemental sulfur and magnesium are impurities in the nanoparticles.

3.3 Dynamic Light Scattering

The nanoparticle aggregation distributions in aqueous solutions for pure TiO2 NPs, 100TiO2:2Fe2NiO4, 100TiO2:3Fe2NiO4 nanocomposite NPs and pure Fe2NiO4 NPs was characterized based on the size (NPs diameter) using Dynamic Light Scattering (DSL) (Fig. 6) and compared to the size distribution deduced from SEM. The diameters deduced from DLS were 260 nm, 324 nm, 232 nm, and 262 nm, respectively, corresponding to pure TiO2 NPS, 100TiO2:2Fe2NiO4 NPs, 100TiO2:3Fe2NiO4 NPs, and pure Fe2NiO4 NPs samples, which are larger than the particle size obtained from SEM for the same samples; this is because nanoparticles tend to aggregate in aqueous solution.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Size distribution measurements of pure TiO2 NPs, 100TiO2:2Fe2NiO4 NPs, 100TiO2:3Fe2NiO4 NPs and pure Fe2NiO4 NPs using DLS

3.4 Photocatalytic Activity Under UV-Irradiation

The UV–Vis spectra of the AO7 aqueous solution as a function of degradation time during the are shown in Fig. 7. UV–Vis absorption spectrum of AO7 exhibits 4 peaks at 230 nm, 256 nm, 308 nm, 482 nm, and a shoulder peak at 430 nm. The presence of hydrazone form is confirmed based on the characteristic peak at 482 nm, whereas the shoulder at 430 nm is associated with the transition of the azo form (Bauer et al., 1999). The two other peaks at 230 nm and 308 nm are attributed to the benzene and naphthalene rings of AO7 molecules (Feng et al., 2000). The absorbance at 482 nm was used to monitor the decolorization of AO7, while the peaks at 230 nm and 308 nm were used to indicate the decomposition of the aromatic moieties of AO7. Noticeably, after 120 min of illumination, the 4 characteristic peaks of AO7 vanished completely and no new peaks were formed, indicating the complete degradation of AO7.

Fig. 7
figure 7

UV–Vis absorbance spectra versus wavelength as a function of UV-irradiation time for (a) pure TiO2 NPs, (b) 100TiO2:1Fe2NiO4, (c) 100TiO2:2Fe2NiO4, (d) 100TiO2:3Fe2NiO4 NPs, (e) 100TiO2:4Fe2NiO4 NPs, (f) 100TiO2:8Fe2NiO4 NPs, and (g) 100TiO2:20Fe2NiO4 NPs, pH = 3, AO7 concentration = 50 mg/L and 100 mg/L catalyst dose

In Fig. 8a , the normalized amplitude of absorbance spectra at 482 nm as a function of irradiation time (represented in scattered points) is fitting to the first-order kinetics model using the formula (C/C0 = exp(-kt)) (represented in solid lines). As the result of the fitting, the first-order reaction rate constants (k) were deduced and plotted versus the Fe2NiO4 NPs wt.% in Fig. 8b ; The best enhancement is observed at coupling rate with Fe2NiO4 NPs of 2 wt.% with relative improvement of 87% compared to pure TiO2 NPs. The most probable explanation could be based on the enhancement of electron–hole pairs separation at 2 wt.%, where, typically, Fe2NiO4 acts as an electron acceptor. Remarkably, at 4 wt.% has the lowest performance between the nanocomposite nanoparticles, but still higher than for pure TiO2.

Fig. 8
figure 8

(a) Normalized amplitudes of the aborbance peak at 482 nm from the UV–Vis absorbance spectra in Fig. 6 versus photocatalytic degradation time of AO7 under UV-irradiation of 50 mg/L AO7 initial concentration; catalyst loading is 100 mg/L, solution pH = 3. Solid lines correspond the fitting of the data to a first-order kinetics. (b) First-order kinetics reaction constant values deduced from (a)

Under the same conditions (100 mg/L catalyst dose, 50 mg/L AO7, and pH = 3), Han et al. (Han et al., 2018) have achieved comparable results by doping TiO2 NPs with Fe3+. The highest rate constant (k = 0.023 min−1) was observed for 100TiO2:20Fe2NiO4 photocatalyst; still, this value is lower than that obtained with coupling with low amounts of Fe2NiO4 (optimum 100TiO2:2Fe2NiO4, k = 0.025 min−1).

The UV–Vis absorbance spectral evolution (Fig. 7) does not seem to indicate a consecutive attenuation process in the absorbance maxima according to irradiation time, since these maxima comprise more than a single absorption peak (frequency band). If the experimental absorption curve was a single peak, then the long exposure of irradiation should simply decrease the amplitude and increase the absorbance linewidth. Spectral analysis was performed to quantify the several frequency absorbance bands of the AO7 over the 25 min of UV–irradiation using TiO2/Fe2NiO4 NPs with different concentrations of Fe2NiO4. The latter spectra were specifically selected over other degradation times because all the functional groups and moieties lines in the spectra of AO7 and intermediate smaller molecules were still present with proper intensity for fitting. The degradation process had already started, implying that all the intermediate species are present. The results show non-monotonic spectral dynamics, including peak wavelength shifts, absolute amplitude, and area changes for the AO7 bands, which suggests the cleavage of an azo bond is not the only or the dominant process.

Because of the frequency bands convolution, the spectral parameters are accordingly highly correlated, and the baseline is modulated. A rigorous regressions approach was applied to achieve fitting convergence. Figure 9ah shows the significant peaks in the spectrum of the UV–Vis fitted to six Gaussian peaks; the fitting converged to the deconvoluted line describing adequately the experimental data. Baseline correction was done by a second derivative method using OriginLab software, in which the fit was found to be inadequate compared with other baseline algorithms, such as polynomial or linear functions.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Peak fits for the absorbance spectra of (a) AO7 initial state and AO7 under 25 min of UV–irradiation with (b) pure TiO2 NPs and 100TiO2:xFe2NiO4 NPs (x = (c) 1,  (d) 2, (e) 3, (f) 4, (g) 8 and (h) 20; i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 20 wt.% of Fe2NiO4)

In the first state (Fig. 9a), the absorption band at 515 nm corresponding to the \(n-{\pi }^{*}\) transitions of the hydrazone form, while the bands at 473 nm and 404 nm corresponding to the \(n-{\pi }^{*}\) transitions of the azo form of the dye in the trans- and cis-states, respectively. These bands are due to the chromophore containing azo-linkage. It is clear that the trans-state in the azo form dominates compared with the cis-state, due to that the trans-state is more stable at room temperature (Ahmad et al., 2021a). The absorption bands at 308 nm and 262 nm are assigned to the \(\pi -{\pi }^{*}\) transition in the naphthalene ring. The energy difference between the two peaks can be attributed to the naphthalene rings in the two cases; azo form and hydrazone form (Maeda et al., 2012), and finally, the absorption band at 229 nm is assigned to the \(\pi -{\pi }^{*}\) transition in benzene ring (Ahmad et al., 2021b; Lau et al., 2014). The shape of the absorption spectrum changed after 25 min of UV–irradiation for all NPs combinations as deduced by the progressing divergence of the all-bands linewidth of the Gaussian function (Fig. 9). Pure TiO2 and TiO2/Fe2NiO4 NPs with different concentrations of Fe2NiO4 were affected similarly on all frequency bands with different variations in the area of the bands. TiO2/Fe2NiO4 NPs of 2 wt.% Fe2NiO4 was the most effective sample (Fig. 10). So, the time evolution of the AO7 spectrum using TiO2:2Fe2NiO4 NPs (2 wt.% of Fe2NiO4) as a catalyst were analyzed.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Integrated area of hydrozone bond, trans(N = N), cis(N = N), naphthalene ring hydrozone and benzene ring under the absorbance peaks of hydrozone bond, trans(N = N), cis(N = N), naphthalene ring hydrozone and benzene ring in AO7 with pure TiO2 NPs and 100TiO2:xFe2NiO4 NPs (x = 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 20; i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 20 wt.% of Fe2NiO4) after 25 min of UV–irradiation

The shape of the absorption spectrum at 2 wt.% Fe2NiO4 as a catalyst changed with irradiation time as inferred by the progressing divergence of the bands area and linewidth of the Gaussian function (Fig. 11). The peak position of the all-frequency bands has an obvious red shift (Fig. 11), showing a decrease in solvent polarity. This results in an initial bathochromic shift in the AO7 absorbance maxima, showing that AO7 is either playing a gradual role of an H-bond donor or the dissociated-intermediate products or AO7 are an H-bond donor (Al-Abdallat et al., 2019). According to the preceding discussion and relevant literature, the H-bonded interaction between water and the azo nitrogen atoms in the AO7 has a significant impact on the bands of the major absorption peak. Further irradiation results in a shallow bathochromic shift and an asymptotic approach, reflecting the nature of the AO7 decolonization process and complete mineralization of the dye. Despite differences in absorbance-effected bonding, both bands were shifted in the same pattern, indicating that the H-bond influenced different sites of AO7 molecules. The total absorbance maxima only fit the same function poorly, designating that the time-dependent degradation described by this total absorbance maxima is triggered by multiple processes. Therefore, studying the time-dependent process of photo-oxidization and defining its efficiency based on the attenuation of the convoluted absorbance maxima is misrepresentative and leads to biased results. This is because of the convoluted process being a complicated response to a combination of nonspecific and specific solute–solvent interactions, which are typical for the molecular chemical structure ability to conduct intermolecular interactions, dipole–dipole interactions, the formation–disruption of hydrogen-bonding networks, and hydrophobic/hydrophilic interactions (Ababneh et al., 2018). A similar argument can be made about the amplitudes of the absorbance peaks, since the area under the absorbance peak is more appropriate to describe the convoluted process rather than the peak amplitude. Figure 12 depicts integrated areas deduced individually from the all-frequency bands. The most probable explanation for AO7 degradation is that during the photocatalytic degradation time, H2O and O2 molecules diffuse in water and capture the generated holes and electrons, resulting in \(\bullet\;\mathrm{OH}\) and superoxide (\(\bullet\;\mathrm O_2^-\)) radicals. The \(\bullet\;\mathrm{OH}\) and \(\bullet\;\mathrm O_2^-\) radicals interact destructively with AO7 molecules, resulting in AO7 decolorization. The color of AO7 is determined by the azo bond (\(-\mathrm{N}=\mathrm{N}-\)) and its associated chromophores and auxochromes, where the energy difference between two separate molecular orbitals falls within the visible spectrum (Bureš, 2014). Moreover, the cis-state band of the azo form was increased compared to the trans-state band of the azo form, where the two bands decreased with increasing UV–irradiation times due to the conversion of trans-isomers to cis-isomers during UV–irradiation (Al-Bataineh et al., 2020b, 2020c).

Fig. 11
figure 11

Peak fits for the absorbance spectra of AO7 for various UV–irradiation times ( (a) 0 min, (b) 10 min, (c) 25 min, (d) 45 min and (e) 60 min) using TiO2:2Fe2NiO4 NPs with 2 wt.% of Fe2NiO4

Fig. 12
figure 12

Integrated area under the absorbance peaks of hydrozone bond, trans(N = N), cis(N = N), naphthalene ring hydrozone and benzene ring in AO7 for various UV–irradiation times using TiO2:2Fe2NiO4 NPs (i.e., 2 wt.% of Fe2NiO4)

The impact of pH on the photocatalytic degradation of AO7 in the presence of 100TiO2:2Fe2NiO4 catalyst under UV-irradiation was investigated. Figure 13a  illustrates the photocatalytic degradation of 100TiO2:2Fe2NiO4 under UV-irradiation at pH values of 3, 6.5, 9, and 12 at the same conditions of the early measurements (AO7 initial concentration was 50 mg/L, catalyst content was 100 mg/L) were conducted. The data was fitted to the first-order kinetics model and the corresponding first-order kinetic rates were deduced (Fig. 13b). Remarkably, pH of the solution strongly affects the photocatalytic degradation of AO7. Since AO7 is an anionic molecule dye, the pH of the solution affected its adsorption and degradation.

Fig. 13
figure 13

(a) Photocatalytic degradation of 100TiO2:2Fe2NiO4 under UV-irradiation at pH values of 3, 6.5, 9, and 12, where AO7 initial concentration was 50 mg/L, catalyst content was 100 mg/L. The data were fitted to the first-order kinetics model representing with the solid lines. (b) The first-order kinetics rate deduced from the fitting in (a) including the fitting error

The first-order reaction rate constant at pH = 9 is 16 folds higher than the rate at pH = 6.5, and 7 folds higher than the rates at pH = 3 and pH = 12. At pH 6.5, the net charge on the surface of TiO2-based photocatalyst is zero. Therefore, adsorption of the negatively charged AO7 dye (anionic pollutant (Khosla et al., 2013)) was minimum since no attraction or repulsion forces were dominant. At pH = 3, the surface of the photocatalyst is a positively charged because of proton abundance, and adsorption of negatively charged AO7 is enhanced. However, due to the high adsorption of AO7, the surface of the catalyst was covered, preventing light photons to penetrate into the catalyst, limiting the degradation rate (Chakrabarti & Dutta, 2004). Excess \({\mathrm{OH}}^{-}\) anions (radicals) are present in the solution at higher pH values (= 12), resulting in the filling of the active sites of the catalyst and thus preventing reactions from taking place. Because of the \({\mathrm{OH}}^{-}\) radicals, the catalyst surface becomes negatively charged, leading to a decrease in the adsorption of AO7 ions because of the electrostatic repulsion-inhibiting, resulting in low catalytic degradation.

Finally, the highest degradation performance was observed at pH = 9. A possible explanation is that the AO7 dye exhibits the maximum ionization inside solution at pH = 9, while at pH = 3, the dye may not be ionized at all; therefore, when the pollutant is ionized inside the solution, it is more likely to be degraded more than partially ionized pollutant, resulting in better performance. Besides that, under moderate alkaline conditions (pH = 9), a reasonable amount of \({\mathrm{OH}}^{-}\) anions are present in the solution, which may aid in generating hydroxyl radicals, resulting in an enhancement in the photodegradation rate.

The degree of ionization of AO7 was estimated using its pKa value (pKa = 11.4 (Pires et al., 2013)) according to the following equation (Watson, 2020):

$$\mathrm{ionization}\%=\frac{{10}^{pKa-pH}}{1+{10}^{pKa-pH}}\times 100$$

At pH = 9, over 99.5% ionization can be achieved. It has been reported that there is no strong correlation between the photodegradation performance and the adsorption amount of AO7 on the surface of TiO2; a decrease in adsorption may not necessarily affect the degradation rate, as the degradation reactions may occur not only inside the catalyst but also inside the bulk solution (Chen et al., 2005).

3.5 COD Removal

COD removal efficiency after 120 min of photocatalysis under UV-irradiation using pure TiO2 NPs and 100TiO2:xFe2NiO4 NPs (x = 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 20; i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 20 wt.% of Fe2NiO4) is illustrated in Fig. 14. The highest COD removal efficiency (63.6%) was observed for the 100TiO2:2Fe2NiO4 photocatalyst, compared with the lowest removal efficiency (42%) recorded for pure TiO2 NPs, confirming the results deduced from the UV–Vis absorbance spectra.

Fig. 14
figure 14

COD removal efficiency after 120 min of photocatalysis under UVirradiation with pH = 3. AO7 concentration = 50 mg/L using pure TiO2 NPs and 100TiO2:xFe2NiO4 NPs (x = 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 20; i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 20 wt.% of Fe2NiO4)

The photocatalytic degradation process of AO7 appears to be highly efficient (95%) in terms of decolorization, but moderately effective in terms of the mineralization (removal of COD) of the contaminants. This may be explained by the formation of reaction intermediates, resulting in chemical fragments that did not decompose over the course of the irradiation experiment (Chiu et al., 2019).

High-resolution 1H and 13C NMR spectra were measured at a 600.13 MHz (B0 = 14.1 T) with a Bruker AVANCE III spectrometer with a Bruker ASCEND 600 magnet provided with the multichannel room temperature probehead (Bruker PABBO). High resolution 5 mm borosilicate glass NMR tubes (Boro600-4–8, Deutero GmbH, Kastellaun, Germany) were used for measurements of 1H at 600.13 MHz and 13C at 240 MHz. Every 500 µL from the samples was mixed with 100 µL of D2O and 20 µL TSP (1 mM in D2O) as a reference. The 1H NMR experiments were acquired using 128 scans (18 min) per measurement, TSP signal was set at zero ppm to calibrate the NMR spectrum. 13C NMR measurement was acquired using 13C channel with 8 k scans (9 h) using the same probehead and same spectrometer. Data acquisition and processing as well as data analysis were conducted with the TopSpin 3.6 software package. Figure 15a and b shows the 1H NMR spectra of AO7 at NMR frequency of 600.13 MHz at different photocatalytic degradation times (Deg. Time) between 0 and 120 min. The NMR signals of the AO7 and the intermediate groups and moieties appear in the chemical shift range (5–8.7) ppm since most of the functional groups belong to the aromatic rings in AO7 and their intermediate reactants. The 1H NMR at different degradation times of AO7 shows the typical NMR spectrum and it broadened because of the high ionic and molecular concentration. The AO7 central frequencies at 7.45 ppm, 7.65 ppm, 7.75 ppm, 7.88 ppm, the signal at 6.7 belongs to the intermediates aromatic that from the start the degradation. The spectrum at time of 20 min showing the resolved signals of AO7 and new signals which belong to naphthalene (7.4 and 7.9) are highly overlapped with the AO7 signals but still can be seen as peak separated. The benzosulfonic acid typically appeared at 7.93 ppm, 6.68 ppm, 7.58 ppm, and 8.65 ppm which obviously existed in the time from 20 min until 60 min and disappeared at 80 and later degradation time. The phenol peaks typically appeared at 6.84, 6.93, and 7.24 indicating that phenol most probably appeared at 60 min and might be attenuated until it is not any more in the spectrum at 100 and 120 min. Several phthalic acid isomers appeared in the aromatic region and characteristically at 7.92 ppm and 8.15 ppm are obviously showing up until at 80 min of degradation. The NMR spectrum after 40 min of degradation shows similar peaks that are in the spectrum at 20 min with less signal broadening and magnitude indicating less concentration and less ionic. The signals appearing at below 4 ppm are enlarged by a factor of 4 × and they belong to the methyl and alkyl groups that originated from impurities. Remarkably, there are no signals can be observed in the 1H NMR spectrum at 120 min indicating complete degradation of the AO7 and all its intermediates. The signal of methyl and alkyl groups from the impurities also depredated in total. To validate the results and to prove that no organic groups that might be bonded to other than protons, 13C NMR measurements were conducted at 120 min, since if we have any other organics, it will definitely appear in the 13C spectrum. Figure 15b shows the 13C NMR spectrum of AO7 after 120 min of photocatalytic degradation process; the spectrum does not exhibit any 13C signals indicating the sample (solution) is free of any possible organic groups which have no proton that can be seen with 1H NMR.

Fig. 15
figure 15

(a) 1H NMR spectra of AO7 at NMR frequency of 600.13 MHz at different photocatalytic degradation time (Deg. Time) between 0 and 120 min. The NMR signals of the AO7 and the intermediate groups and moieties are indicated are indicating by using the dotted squares and their chemical structure attached to the squares, the signals appeared at below 4 ppm are enlarged by factor of 4 × and they are belonging to the methyl and alkyl groups originated from impurities. (b) The 13C NMR spectrum of AO7 after 120 min of photocatalytic degradation process, no 13C signals after 8 k scans indicating an organic free solution

Based on the above results, AO7 degradation is a combined process since AO7 moieties degrade in a somewhat sequential and parallel manner. The C–N single bond between the azo bond and the benzene ring is the first degradation bond, and this is can be supported by the disappearance of the C–N vibrational band of the aromatic amine in the FTIR spectra, as reported in the literature (Lau et al., 2014; Zhu et al., 2012). The breakdown of the C–N bond leads to the formation of benzenesulfonic acid (C6H6SO3) and hydroxy-naphthalene-diazonium (C10H8N2O). Meanwhile, the benzenesulfonic acid ionization constant of releasing sodium ion (Na+) to the solution changed to different values leading to a change in the solution acidity. The primary reaction was further degraded to form lower-molecular weight products, and the hydroxy-naphthalene-diazonium was then transformed into naphthalene-diazonium (C10H8N2) according to Ghodake et al. (2011). Due to the extended valence shells of the large sulfur atom, the desulfonation reaction of benzenesulfonic acid into an aryl sulfonic group and the benzene ring occurs in parallel (Ababneh et al., 2018). The benzene ring then reacts with the \({\mathrm{OH}}^{-}\) to produce phenol, and the naphthalene-diazonium transforms into benzene-1,2-dicarboxylic acid. Finally, the phenol and benzene-1,2-dicarboxylic acid degrade to carbon dioxide (CO2) and water, respectively (Mani et al., 2019). Figure 16 depicts a diagram of the aforementioned degradation pathways.

Fig. 16
figure 16

Photodegradation pathway of AO7 based on the results from this work and literature review

The above degradation pathways and associated rates (k1 through k12) may explain the loose fitting of the experimental data to the first-order kinetics model of AO7 degradation, and thus this single kinetic rate is somewhat the average of the overall process. The average fit is still acceptable and can express the process and can be referred to as the apparent kinetic rate.

3.6 Electrical Energy Consumption

The electrical power consumption of the photocatalysis of 1.8 L of 50 mg/L AO7 aqueous solutions under UV light using 100 mg/L 100TiO2:2Fe2NiO4 catalysts along with a comparison with similar systems reported in the literature are presented in Table 3. In terms of energy consumption, the proposed optimum system in this research demonstrated exceptional electrical energy utilization. For the same removal efficiencies (~ 90%), 50.3 kWh/m3 electric energy consumption was calculated for degradation of high concentrations of AO7 (50 mg/L), compared to the lowest consumption (43 kWh/m3) of lower concentrations of AO7 (10 mg/L). This is due to the highly efficient design of the reactor, in which the UV lamp was immersed inside the reactor to achieve maximum energy utilization and efficiency.

Table 3 Comparison of EEO (kWh/m3) with some recent studies in the literature for photocatalysis of different organic pollutants using TiO2-based photocatalyst

Moreover, according to Table 3, the electrical energy consumption for the present system was almost the lowest among all the presented recent researches, despite the fact that the concentration was around 60% higher (requires more energy), demonstrating that the model system used in this study is significantly more efficient.

4 Conclusions

The calculated size distribution from SEM micrographs for TiO2 NPs, 100TiO2:2Fe2NiO4, and 100TiO2:3Fe2NiO4 nanocomposites NPs is in the range of 15–25 nm while for pure Fe2NiO4, is in the range of 30–50 nm, being all of spherical shape. The size distribution in an aqueous solution was also measured using DLS and was found to agglomerate in clusters with sizes up to 250 nm. The UV-light-induced photocatalysis was found to follow first-order kinetics, and the highest degradation performance was observed at pH = 9, which corresponds to the maximum degree of AO7 dye ionization inside the solution. The most efficient coupling rate was achieved by using 2 wt.% of Fe2NiO4 NPs of with a relative improvement in the kinetic rate constant of 87% compared to that of pure TiO2 NPs: This is ascribed to the enhancement of electron–hole pairs separation and size of the unit cell volume that was the largest at 2 wt.%. Spectral deconvolution analysis was performed to quantify the several frequency absorbance bands of the AO7 over the course of 25 min of UV–irradiation, and the results revealed non-monotonic spectral dynamics including peak wavelength shifts, absolute amplitude, and area changes for the AO7 bands.