Abstract
Although there are several studies that described the possible participation of Mycoplasmopsis bovirhinis (formerly, Mycoplasma bovirhinis) in respiratory disease in calves worldwide, none of these evaluated the effects of concomitant infections on the shedding of this organism. Accordingly, this study evaluated the effects of simultaneous respiratory infections in dairy calves on the nasal shedding of M. bovirhinis. A statistical two-step model, using univariable and multivariable with logistic regression was developed to investigate and predict the possible effects of simultaneous infections by Histophilus somni, Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, bovine coronavirus (BCoV), and ovine gammaherpesvirus 2 (OvGHV2) in dairy calves on the nasal shedding of M. bovirhinis. The multivariable analysis demonstrated that dairy calves infected with OvGHV2 have 2.59 times likelihood of nasal shedding of M. bovirhinis relative to calves not infected by OvGHV2, while the odds of nasal shedding of M. bovirhinis was 3.46 times higher in dairy calves infected by M. haemolytica. In contrast, simultaneous respiratory infections in dairy calves by H. somni, P. multocida, and BCoV had no direct effect on the nasal shedding of M. bovirhinis. Consequently, infections by OvGHV2 and M. haemolytica may be possible risk factors for the nasal shedding of M. bovirhinis in dairy calves. These results demonstrated the importance of disease modeling in veterinary medicine to predict and understand the complex outcomes of associations in animals concomitantly infected by several disease pathogens.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is multietiological disease complex associated with a wide range of infectious disease pathogens in conjunction with alterations in environmental, climatic, and management practices (Griffin et al. 2010; Castro et al. 2021; Confer and Ayalew 2018; Rice et al. 2007). Animals with clinical BRD may terminate in some form of pneumonia if not adequately medicated. The clinical and pathological consequences of BRD frequently result in elevated cattle morbidity, mortality, and lethality worldwide. Viral disease agents frequently associated with the development of BRD include bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV), bovine parainfluenza virus (BPIV3), bovine alphaherpesvirus 1 (BoAHV1), and bovine coronavirus (BCoV) (Castro et al. 2021; Fulton et al. 2009; Zhou et al. 2023). Additionally, there are accumulating evidence to suggest that the Macavirus, ovine gammaherpesvirus 2 (OvGHV2), the cause of sheep-associated malignant catarrhal fever, can serve as a viral pathogen for respiratory disease (Headley et al. 2023a, b; Frucchi et al. 2024). Bacterial agents frequently identified in BRD are Histophilus somni, Pasteurella multocida, Mannheimia haemolytica, and Mycoplasmopsis bovis (formerly, Mycoplasma bovis) (Griffin et al. 2010; Castro et al. 2021; Zhou et al. 2023).
Mycoplasmas are microorganisms within the genus Mycoplasmopsis, class Mollicutes, family Metamycoplasmataceae (Gupta et al. 2018). Most members of the Mycoplasmopsis genus are animal pathogens (Gupta et al. 2018), with M. bovis probably being the most widely studied organism within this genus. While the role of M. bovisin the development of calf pneumonia is well established (Radostits et al. 2017), the exact participation of Mycoplasmopsis bovirhinis (formerly, Mycoplasma bovirhinis) in the etiopathogenesis of respiratory disease in cattle remains obscure (Frucchi et al. 2024). Nevertheless, several studies have suggested that this organism may be associated with the development of pulmonary disease in cattle (Quinn et al. 2011; Radostits et al. 2017). In contrast, M. bovirhinis was detected in pulmonary sections of cattle without any associated disease pattern (Thomas et al. 2002), and is considered as an opportunistic organism of ruminants (Quinn et al. 2011; Radostits et al. 2017).
Our research group has demonstrated that M. bovirhinis was the most frequently identified organism in nasal samples from asymptomatic (55.3%; 57/103) and symptomatic (57.8%; 59/102) dairy calves from 15 dairy herds that were simultaneously infected by BCoV, OvGHV2, H. somni, and P. multocida (Frucchi et al. 2024). Similar studies have identified concomitant infections of M. bovirhinis with other recognized organisms of BRD within the bronchoalveolar fluids (Angen et al. 2009; Thomas et al. 2002), as well as in the nasal (McDaneld et al. 2022) and pulmonary (Zhou et al. 2023) samples of cattle. However, the authors have not identified any published study, within major English and Latin databases, that investigated the possible effects of nasal shedding of M. bovirhinis in calves with BRD. Accordingly, the objectives of this study were to investigate and predict the possible effects of concomitant infections due to BCoV, OvGHV2, H. somni, and P. multocida on the odds of nasal shedding of M. bovirhinis in dairy calves with BRD.
Materials and methods
Study location, animals, and sampling
This study was done with dairy calves from three farms located in two milk producing regions of southern Brazil. All farms were medium-sized milking producing dairy herds located within the municipalities of Arapoti (Farms #1 and 2) and Clevelândia (Farm #3), Paraná state, Brazil (Table 1). These three farms were selected for this investigation from a previous study (Frucchi et al. 2024) since they contained the most dynamic distribution of simultaneous and singular infectious agents of BRD in dairy calves as well as BRD negative dairy calves.
Nasal samples (NS) were collected from calves (n = 87) using commercially produced synthetic nylon swabs (16 cm) that were inserted into the ventral meatus of the nostril and were derived from a previous investigation of simultaneous infections due to M. bovirhinis and other agents of BRD in calves from 15 dairy herds (Frucchi et al. 2024). In that study (Frucchi et al. 2024), calves were characterized as BRD positive due to the manifestations of at least four clinical signs, including fever (> 40 °C), cough, nasal and/or ocular discharge, and dyspnea (Ferraro et al. 2021). In contrast, dairy calves without any of these clinical signs were classified as BRD negative (Frucchi et al. 2024).
Molecular detection and sequencing of BRD-associated pathogens from nasal samples of dairy calves
The extracted nucleic acids from the NS were used in molecular assays designed to amplify specific genes of the principal agents associated with BRD, including M. bovirhinis, H. somni, P. multocida, M. haemolytica, M. bovis, BVDV, BoAHV1, BRSV, BCoV, BPIV3, and OvGHV2, as described (Frucchi et al. 2024). The specific target genes, desired base pairs of the amplicon, primers sequences, and the related reference can be consulted (Supplementary Table 1). Positive controls consisted of nucleic acids of these organisms derived from previous studies (Headley et al. 2023a, b). Sterile, ultrapure water (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) served as negative control. Both controls were included in all molecular assays. All PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, and examined under ultraviolet light. The sequence confirmation of the infectious agents detected in these molecular assays was done as previously described (Frucchi et al. 2024), using standard molecular diagnostic procedures.
Statistical analyses
The Epiinfo program (version 7.2.3.1) generated all frequency tables and was used to determine a possible statistically significant association between the molecular detection of disease pathogens of BRD and the occurrence of clinical manifestations. The Yates-corrected Chi-square or Fisher´s exact test was used with a significance level of p < 0.05. In addition, when appropriate the obtained results were interpreted by using descriptive statistical analyses.
Statistical model designed to determine the risk of Mycoplasmopsis bovirhinis shedding in nasal samples of dairy calves
Input data for the statistical models were derived from a previous investigation (Frucchi et al. 2024) and are summarized in Table 1. The variables associated with individual risk of shedding M. bovirhinis were explored using a 2-step approach. Firstly, univariable analyses were performed using univariable logistic regression, during which unconditional odds ratio and associated 95% confidence intervals were noted. Then, in a second stage, variables with P-values < 0.2 were retained for the multivariable analysis. A logistic regression analysis using M. bovirhinis positivity as a dichotomous variable was used. A manual backward stepwise method was used until all variables remain with P-values < 0.05. All analyses were performed with the R software ( R Core Team 2021). The effect plots obtained from the multivariable model were obtained using sjPlot R package. The discrimination of the model was determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUC). Interpretation of AUC values were based on the most commonly reported benchmarks with 0.5–0.6 as poor, 0.6–0.7 as low, 0.7–0.8 as moderate, 0.8–0.9 as good, and 0.9-1.0 as excellent discrimination (de Hond et al. 2022).
Results
Infection dynamics observed in dairy calves
The distribution of the infectious disease agents diagnosed in dairy calves at the three farms is presented in Table 1. Although no significant statistical difference was observed between the occurrence of infectious disease pathogens between BRD-diseased and asymptomatic dairy calves (Table 1), BCoV (37.84%; 14/37) and P. multocida (37.84%; 14/37) were the most frequently diagnosed pathogens among all BRD-diseased calves. In contrast, OvGHV2 (85.71%; 6/7) and BCoV (65.38%; 17/26) were the most frequently diagnosed pathogens among asymptomatic dairy calves. Additionally, H. somni was only diagnosed in BRD-diseased calves from Farm #3. Moreover, specific nucleic acids of M. haemolytica, M. bovis, BVDV, BoAHV1, BRSV, and BPIV3 were not detected.
Effects of simultaneous infections on Mycoplasmopsis bovirhinis nasal shedding in dairy calves
The results of the prediction for the shedding of M. bovirhinis in dairy calves are provided in Table 2. This multivariable model demonstrated that two simultaneous infections in dairy calves had direct effects on the nasal shedding of M. bovirhinis: OvGHV2 and M. haemolytica. The likelihood of dairy calves being infected by M. bovirhinis was 2.59 (95%CI: 1.02–6.756) times more elevated in calves that were positive for OvGHV2 as compared with calves that were negative for OvGHV2. Additionally, the odds of dairy calves being infected by M. bovirhinis were 3.46 (1.30-9.636) times higher for calves that were M. haemolytica positive, as opposed to calves not infected by M. haemolytica.
These relationships are more easily appreciated in the effect plot graphs generated from the multivariable model (Fig. 1). The probability of dairy calves to shed M. bovirhinis varied from 30 to 75% when being simultaneously infected with M. haemolytica (A), while the probability of shedding M. bovirhinis in NS varied from 25 to 75% in dairy calves concomitantly infected by OvGHV2 (B). Furthermore, the multivariable model has demonstrated that simultaneous infections by H. somni, P. multocida, and BCOV demonstrated no positive effect on the nasal shedding of M. bovirhinis in dairy calves. However, the discrimination of the multivariable model was low (AUC = 0.689, 95%CI:0.580–0.799).
Discussion
Dairy calves infected by OvGHV2 and M. haemolytica were more likely to shed M. bovirhinis in nasal secretions
The results of the current study have demonstrated that the multivariable model used herein could be useful to predict the nasal shedding of M. bovirhinis in dairy calves. As far as the authors are knowledgeable, this is probably the first study to design a model to investigate nasal shedding of M. bovirhinis. Consequently, these findings are novel and important as they demonstrate that the probability of dairy calves to shed M. bovirhinis was increased in calves that were concomitant infected by M. haemolytica and OvGHV2. Therefore, it seems that infections by M. haemolytica and OvGHV2 may be possible risk factors for the occurrence of M. bovirhinis in dairy calves. In contrast, simultaneous infections by H. somni, P. multocida, and BCoV seem not to have any effect on the nasal shedding of M. bovirhinis in these dairy calves. However, the discrimination of the model was relatively poor, which means that on an individual basis we could not rely on the identification of M. haemolytica and OvGHV2 to accurately predict the M. bovirhinis status.
These initial results are however interesting for the dairy industry particularly in Brazil, and possibly in other countries, where subclinical infections by OvGHV2 are being diagnosed (Headley et al. 2022; Xavier et al. 2023; O'Toole et al. 2002). This is because most commercially available vaccines are efficient in protecting cattle against infections due to M. haemolytica, P. multocida, H somni, and BCoV. While there is no vaccine currently available for the control and/or mitigation of infections induced by OvGHV2. The local scenario relative to infections by OvGHV2 in dairy cattle is even worsened, since the results of a serological assay done within a geographical region of elevated milk production in Brazil has demonstrated seropositivity to this pathogen in 7.9% (29/367) of all cows and 37.2% (16/43) of all dairy farms evaluated (manuscript in preparation).
M. haemolytica is a well-known bacterial agent associated with the development of BRD in dairy and feedlot cattle worldwide (Griffin et al. 2010; Castro et al. 2021; Confer and Ayalew 2018; Rice et al. 2007). Unlike OvGHV2, M. haemolytica is a commensal organism of the respiratory tracts of ruminants (Confer and Ayalew 2018; Rice et al. 2007), and requires stress-induced conditions, such as alterations in the immune system of the host, viral infections, adverse environmental and climatic changes, to become pathogenic (Rice et al. 2007). In addition, this bacterium has a wide range of virulence factors that facilitate infection in the affected host (Confer and Ayalew 2018; Rice et al. 2007). However, as indicated above there are numerous immunization therapies to prevent this bacterial infection as well as efficient antibiotics to treat infected animals (Confer and Ayalew 2018; Rice et al. 2007).
No association was observed between the occurrence of the pathogens in BRD-positive and asymptomatic calves
As was expected, no significant statistical association was observed between the occurrence of the five pathogens identified in BRD-positive and asymptomatic dairy calves, considering that these data originated from a previous study with similar results (Frucchi et al. 2024). Although BCoV and P. multocida were the most frequently diagnosed pathogens of BRD in the dairy calves evaluated, these two pathogens seem to demonstrate no influence on the nasal shedding of M. bovirhinis. Additionally, since the infection dynamics associated with the simultaneous occurrence of these five pathogens were thoroughly described (Frucchi et al. 2024), the discussion above was based on the effects of simultaneous infections on the nasal shedding of M. bovirhinis.
Study limitations
Although these results are interesting in demonstrating the complex associations between infectious disease agents in the development of respiratory disease in dairy calves, a more robust model would have obtained more consistent results. Consequently, the concomitant identification of other members of the Mycoplasmopsis genus, such as M. bovis, in these dairy calves as well as the utilization of larger data set could probably have provided more stability to the model with a more robust AUC values. Nonetheless, these initial findings demonstrated the importance of disease modeling in veterinary medicine.
Conclusions
The multivariable statistical model demonstrated that concomitant respiratory infections of OvGHV2 and M. haemolytica had a positive effect on the nasal shedding of M. bovirhinis in dairy calves with BRD. In contrast, simultaneous respiratory infections with BCoV and P. multocida had no effect on the shedding of M. bovirhinis.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Angen O, Thomsen J, Larsen LE, Larsen J, Kokotovic B, Heegaard PM et al (2009) Respiratory disease in calves: microbiological investigations on trans-tracheally aspirated bronchoalveolar fluid and acute phase protein response. Vet Microbiol 137(1–2):165–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.12.024
Castro MM, Oliveira TES, Headley SA (2021) Bovine respiratory disease in Brasil: a short review. Semin Cienc Agrar 42:2081–2110. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n3supl1p2081
Confer AW, Ayalew S (2018) Mannheimia haemolytica in bovine respiratory disease: immunogens, potential immunogens, and vaccines. Anim Health Res Rev 19(2):79–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1466252318000142
de Hond AAH, Steyerberg EW, van Calster B (2022) Interpreting area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Lancet Digit Health 4(12):e853–e855. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00188-1
Ferraro S, Fecteau G, Dubuc J, Francoz D, Rousseau M, Roy JP et al (2021) Scoping review on clinical definition of bovine respiratory disease complex and related clinical signs in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 104(6):7095–7108. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19471
Frucchi APS, Dall Agnol AM, Caldart ET, Bronkhorst DE, Alfieri AF, Alfieri AA et al (2024) The role of Mycoplasma bovirhinis in the development of singular and concomitant respiratory infections in dairy calves from southern Brazil. Pathogens 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13020114
Fulton RW, Blood KS, Panciera RJ, Payton ME, Ridpath JF, Confer AW et al (2009) Lung pathology and infectious agents in fatal feedlot pneumonias and relationship with mortality, disease onset, and treatments. J Vet Diagn Invest 21(4):464–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063870902100407
Griffin D, Chengappa MM, Kuszak J, McVey DS (2010) Bacterial pathogens of the bovine respiratory disease complex. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 26(2):381–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2010.04.004
Gupta RS, Sawnani S, Adeolu M, Alnajar S, Oren A (2018) Phylogenetic framework for the phylum Tenericutes based on genome sequence data: proposal for the creation of a new order Mycoplasmoidales ord. nov., containing two new families Mycoplasmoidaceae fam. nov. and Metamycoplasmataceae fam. nov. harbouring Eperythrozoon, Ureaplasma and five novel genera. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 111(9):1583–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-018-1047-3
Headley SA, Lemos GAA, Dall Agnol AM, Xavier AAC, Depes VCA, Yasumitsu CY et al (2022) Ovine gammaherpesvirus 2 infections in cattle without typical manifestations of sheep-associated malignant catarrhal fever and concomitantly infected with bovine coronavirus. Braz J Microbiol 53:433–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-021-00653-6
Headley SA, Dall Agnol AM, Bessegato JA, Frucchi APS, Maturana EFL, Rodrigues RV et al (2023a) Association of ovine gammaherpesvirus 2 with an outbreak of acute respiratory disease in dairy cattle. Sci Rep 13(1):5623. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30133-w
Headley SA, Fritzen JTT, Silva DC, Xavier AAC, Yasumitsu CY, Silva FHP et al (2023b) Histophilus somni disease conditions with simultaneous infections by ovine gammaherpesvirus 2 in cattle herds from Southern Brazil. Braz J Microbiol 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-023-00915-5
McDaneld TG, Workman AM, Chitko-McKown CG, Kuehn LA, Dickey A, Bennett GL (2022) Detection of Mycoplasma bovirhinis and bovine coronavirus in an outbreak of bovine respiratory disease in nursing beef calves. Front Microbiomes. 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/frmbi.2022.1051241
O’Toole D, Li H, Sourk C, Montgomery DL, Crawford TB (2002) Malignant catarrhal fever in a bison (Bison bison) feedlot, 1993–2000. J Vet Diagn Invest 14(3):183–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063870201400301
Quinn PJ, Markey BK, Leonard FC, FitzPatrick ES, Fanning S, Hartigan PJ (2011) Mycoplasmas. Veterinary microbiology and microbial disease. 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, pp 373–83
Radostits OM, Gay CC, Hinchcliff KW, Constable PD (2017) Diseases of the respiratory tract associated with Mycoplasma spp. In: Constable PD, Hinchcliff KW, Done SH, Grünberg W (eds) Veterinary medicine A textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats, 10th edn. Elsevier, St. Louis, pp 924–978
Rice JA, Carrasco-Medina L, Hodgins DC, Shewen PE (2007) Mannheimia haemolytica and bovine respiratory disease. Anim Health Res Rev 8(2):117–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1466252307001375
R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/
Thomas A, Ball H, Dizier I, Trolin A, Bell C, Mainil J et al (2002) Isolation of mycoplasma species from the lower respiratory tract of healthy cattle and cattle with respiratory disease in Belgium. Vet Rec 151(16):472–476. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.151.16.472
Xavier AAC, Queiroz GR, Lisbôa JAN, Cunha CW, Headley SA (2023) Immunohistochemical identification of a malignant catarrhal fever virus in cattle with renal diseases from Paraná state, Southern Brazil: a retrospective epidemiological study. Trop Anim Health Prod 55:344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03740-y
Zhou Y, Shao Z, Dai G, Li X, Xiang Y, Jiang S et al (2023) Pathogenic infection characteristics and risk factors for bovine respiratory disease complex based on the detection of lung pathogens in dead cattle in Northeast China. J Dairy Sci 106(1):589–606. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-21929
Acknowledgements
Headley, S.A., Alfieri, A.F.A, and Alfieri, A.A. are the recipients of the Brazilian National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq; Brazil) fellowship.
Funding
We are grateful for all financial resources received from CNPq, Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES, Brazil), Araucária Foundation (FAP/PR), and the National Institute of Science and Technology for Dairy Production Chain (INCT– LEITE) that were used during the development of this investigation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, S.A.H., and S.B.; Molecular investigation, A.M.D.G., A.F.A., and A.A.A.; Statistical modeling and data validation, S.B.; Investigation and methodology, S.A.H., A.M.D.A., S.B.; Data obtention and sampling: A.M.D.A., A.F.A., and A.A.A.; Resource acquisition, S.A.H, A.F.A., and A.A.A.; Writing—original draft, S.A.H.; writing—review and editing, all authors; Project administration, S.A.H.; Project supervision, S.A.H., and A.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the final version of the submitted manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Permission to realize studies in ruminants was obtained from the National Council for the Control of Animals in Experiments (CONCEA; Brazil) and approved by the Animal Ethics Committees for Animal Usage of the Universidade Estadual de Londrina (CEUA/UEL; protocol, 835.2019.45).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning the re-search, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Headley, S.A., Dall Agnol, A.M., Alfieri, A.F. et al. The effects of simultaneous respiratory infections on the nasal shedding of Mycoplasmopsis bovirhinis in dairy calves. Vet Res Commun (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-024-10529-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-024-10529-3