Laboratory experiments on clayey soils under dynamic triaxial compression were conducted to establish a nonlinear relationship between the dynamic modulus of soil deformation and the frequency of impact. The most significant increase in the dynamic modulus of soil deformation is observed under an increase in frequency from 5 to 10 Hz. In comparison with fluvioglacial soils, the dynamic deformation modulus in glacial loams grows slower under an increase in frequency. This confirms the dependence of the obtained relations on the genesis of soils. The research results were used to develop vibration protection systems for high-precision equipment in high-tech industries.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
G. G. Boldyrev and I. H. Idrisov, Methods for Determination of Dynamic Properties of Soils, Moscow, Pronto (2018).
V. A. Pshenichkina, V. V. Drozdov, and S. I. Strok, “Influence of the foundation bed stiffness on the dynamic properties of the building as a multi-mass cantilever bar,” Struct. Mech. of Eng. Constr. Build., 16, No. 4, 298–310 (2020), https://doi.org/10.22363/1815-5235-2020-16-4-298-310.
E. A. Voznesensky, Ground Behavior under Dynamic Loads, Moscow, Moscow State University Press (1997).
К. Ishihara, Soil Behavior in Earthquakes. Achievements of Modern Geotechnics Series, NPO Georekonstruktsia- Fundamentproekt (2006).
S. L. Kramer, Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, New Jersey, Prentice Hall (1996).
V. L. Mondrus and V. A. Smirnov, Vibration Protection of High-Precision Equipment from Low-Frequency Vibrations, ACADEMIA, Architecture and Construction, No. 1, 109–111 (2011).
R. Dobry and M. Vucetic, “Dynamic properties and seismic response of soft clay deposits,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geotechnical Engeneering and Soft Soils, Mexico (1987).
K. A. Kojobaev, Thixotropy, Dilatancy and Liquefaction of Dispersed Soils, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geology (1991).
S. Shibuya, T. Mitachi, F. Fukuda, and T. Degoshi, “Strain rate effects on shear modulus and damping of normally consolidated clay,” Geotech. Test. J., 18, No. 3, 365–375 (1995).
J. Camacho-Tauta, “Evaluation of the small-strain stiffness of soil by non-conventional dynamic testing methods,“ PhD Thesis, Technical University of Lisbon, Lisbon (2011).
J. Camacho-Tauta, O. J. Reyes, and J. Santos, “Evaluation of the frequency effects on the shear wave velocity of saturated sands,” 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal (2012).
Z. Khan, G. Cascante, M. El Naggar, and C. Lai, “Measurement of frequency-dependent dynamic properties of soils using the resonant-column device,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 134, No. 9, 1319–1326 (2008).
W. B. Gookin, J. Bray, and M. Riemer, The Combined Effects of Loading Frequency and Other Parameters on Dynamic Properties of Reconstituted Cohesive Soils, University of California, Berkeley, UC Berkeley Geotechnical Engineering Report No. GT/99-14 (1999).
S. Yamada, M. Hyodo, R. P. Orense, and S. V. Dinesh, “Initial shear modulus of remolded sand-clay mixtures,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 134, No. 7, 960–971 (2008).
E. S. Sobolev and A. S. Buslov, “Dynamic stability analysis and basic action for struggle with dynamic soil liquefaction,” 27th R-S-P Seminar, Theoretical Foundation of Civil Engineering (27RSP), Rostov-on-Don, Russia (2018).
A. Z. Ter-Martirosyan and E. S. Sobolev, “Dynamic problems of scientific support construction,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 869, Art. No. 072011, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/869/7/072011 (2020).
A. Z. Ter-Martirosyan and E. S. Sobolev, “Analysis of the seismic stability of foundations according to laboratory soil tests,” 7th International Scientific Conference Integration, Partnership and Innovation in Construction Science and Education (IPICSE 2020), Tashkent, Uzbekistan (2021).
H. B. Seed and I. M. Idriss, “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential,” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 97, No. 9, 1249–1273 (1971).
M. Ahmad, X. Tang, M. Hadzima-Nyarko, F. Ahmad, A. Nawaz, and A. Farooq, “Elucidation of Seismic Soil Liquefaction Significant Factors,” Earthquakes – from Tectonics to Buildings, London, IntechOpen (2021).
E. A. Sentsova, M. S. Nikitin, and E. A. Voznesensky, “Sandy soils dynamic strength parameters according to triaxial tests,” Engineering Geology World, 14, No. 2, 24–33 (2019), https://doi.org/10.25296/1993-5056-2019-14-2-24-33.
GOST P 56353-2022. Soils. Laboratory Methods for Determination of dispersed soil dynamic properties.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Osnovaniya, Fundamenty i Mekhanika Gruntov, No. 2, March-April, 2024.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sobolev, E.S., Bogdanov, Y.A. Dependence of the Dynamic Modulus of Soil Deformation on Impact Frequency. Soil Mech Found Eng 61, 153–156 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-024-09956-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-024-09956-w