Introduction

Azoxybenzenes or diphenyldiazene oxides have been considered as one of the important and prominent intermediates in material science, pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals [1]. These materials, as 1,3-dipolar compounds, are composed of an unusual oxygen–nitrogen–nitrogen bond in their structure [2]. Azoxyarenes have been utilized as polymerization inhibitors, therapeutic medicines, chemical stabilizers, reducing agents, dyes, analytical reagents and also key building blocks for electronic devices [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Commonly, these types of compounds are prepared by the oxidation of anilines and reduction of nitroarenes. Anilines can be oxidized using the heterogeneous catalysts and oxidants to produce azoxybenzenes [9,10,11]. However, this procedure provides the products with low selectivity and by-products in a large amount. On the other hand, nitroarenes can be reduced by using several types of methods [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. But because of the complexity of multiple reduction steps, producing the highly selective azoxybenzenes often requires unique catalysts or complex reduction systems [19]. As well, azoxyarenes can be prepared from nitrosohydroxylamine ammonium salts [20], hydroxylamines [21], nitroso [22, 23] and azo compounds [24, 25]. As outlined in Scheme 1, types of intermediates and products are obtained during the reduction of nitroarenes. Accordingly, the use of appropriate reaction conditions is required to acquire a selective intermediate or product.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Reaction pathways during the reduction of nitroarenes

Currently, heterogeneous catalysts have been developed as a major part in various organic syntheses to improve and facilitate diverse synthetic reactions [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. To date, the utilization of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) has attracted a lot of attention due to their easy separation by using an external magnetic field instead of usual filtration methods [41, 42]. Also, the application of magnetite core–shell nanocomposites as effective catalysts has been widely considered [43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52].

In addition, the use of trimetallic catalysts has been considerably attracted due to the better technological and scientific properties of this type of nanoparticles. The trimetallic NPs have been synthesized by various methods such as selective catalytic reduction, microwave, micro-emulsion, hydrothermal and co-precipitation. The surface of trimetallic nanoparticles is relatively unstable, so it easily precipitates from their solution and eventually reduces their catalytic activity. Thus, the trimetallic nanocomposites can be stabilized and synthesized with organic and inorganic compounds [53].

In recent years, the development of simple approaches for the synthesis of different chemical compounds, especially natural products and fundamental materials under green conditions, is desirable. In this regard, the use of heterogeneous magnetic trimetallic nanocomposites based on green chemistry under mild reaction conditions is required for efficient synthesis of azoxybenzenes.

In continuation of our research on the successful synthesis of layered double hydroxides (LDHs) with a combination of three cations on the surface of nanomagnetic cores [40], herein, we would like to report the novel recoverable trimetallic Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb nanocatalyst for the chemoselective reduction of nitroarenes to azoxyarenes in the presence of NaBH4 as a hydrogen donor in water, with a simple and by-product free approach (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2
scheme 2

One-pot reduction of nitroarenes to azoxyarenes with Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb/NaBH4/H2O system

Results and discussion

Synthesis and characterizations of Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb NPs

The magnetic nanocatalyst was prepared with an easy co-precipitation method using a three-step process: (i) preparation of magnetite NPs; (ii) synthesis of Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs at ambient temperature; and (iii) growth of Co–Zr–Sb trimetallic nanoparticles on the surface of SiO2-layered Fe3O4 by an in situ growth method via aqueous solutions of Co2+, Zr4+ and Sb3+ salts (Scheme 3). Also, Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb nanocatalyst was characterized using various methods such as Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX), vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD).

Scheme 3
scheme 3

Synthesis of nanomagnetic Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb NPs

Firstly, the functional groups in the magnetic nanoparticles of Fe3O4, Fe3O4@SiO2 and Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb were identified by the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The strong absorption peak at low wavenumber (579 cm−1) in the FT-IR spectrum of magnetite (Fig. 1a) comes from the vibration of Fe–O bonds in iron oxide. The absorption bands at around 3400 and 1625 cm−1 correspond to the O–H stretching and deforming modes in the adsorbed water, respectively. FT-IR spectrum of silica-layered magnetite (Fig. 1b) shows additional peaks compared to the Fe3O4 one. The broad bands at 1090 and 791 cm−1 are referred to the asymmetrical and symmetrical stretching vibrations of Si–O–Si, which confirm the presence of SiO2 layers in the magnetic nanoparticles. Figure 1c exhibits the FT-IR spectrum of Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb MNPs. The characteristic peaks of 3500 cm−1 (stretching band of metal hydroxyl groups and hydrogen-bonded water molecules), 1600 cm−1 (deformation absorption of water), 1385 cm−1 (stretching of interlayer CO32− ions) and 500–1000 cm−1 (lattice vibration peaks of M–OH and M–O) indicate the structure in the core–shell nanocomposite.

Fig. 1
figure 1

FT-IR spectrum of a Fe3O4, b Fe3O4@SiO2, and c Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb NPs

The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) provides more detailed information on the morphology of the surface and size distribution of the synthesized magnetic nanomaterials (Fig. 2). The Fe3O4 nanoparticles show roughly granular and spherical shape in the range of 23–43 nm (Fig. 2a). As well, the microscopy image of Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs represents uniform particles in the range of 22–30 nm (Fig. 2b). In the case of Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb NPs with different magnifications, SEM images indicate that the surface of nanoparticles is modified and the size distribution is about 18–23 nm (Fig. 2c,d). Accordingly, the structure of nanocatalyst can be identified by SEM images.

Fig. 2
figure 2

SEM images of a Fe3O4, b Fe3O4@SiO2, and c, d Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb NPs

The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy is a convenient method for detecting elements with weight and atomic percentage in a material. EDX analysis of Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb (Fig. 3) shows the presence of O, Si, Fe, Co, Zr and Sb elements in the structure of magnetic nanocomposite. This technique clearly shows that Co–Zr–Sb species have been successfully immobilized on the surface of Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs.

Fig. 3
figure 3

EDX spectrum and elemental composition of Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb NPs

Magnetic properties were studied by the vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). Figure 4 illustrates the magnetic characterization of the synthesized samples. The curves clearly show a decrease in the amount of magnetism during the immobilization of a layer around the other. The saturation magnetization (Ms) value of Fe3O4 (Fig. 4a), Fe3O4@SiO2 (Fig. 4b) and Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb NPs (Fig. 4c) is around 70, 30 and 4 emu g−1, respectively. Therefore, the amount of Ms is reduced by coating one layer on another.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Magnetization curve of (a) Fe3O4, (b) Fe3O4@SiO2 and (c) Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb NPs

The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) provides more detailed information on the particle morphology of the as-prepared nanocomposite. TEM images of Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb NPs indicate the dark cores surrounded by the other shells (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

TEM images of nanomagnetic-Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb NPs

The XRD pattern of Fe3O4, Fe3O4@SiO2 and Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb NPs was measured by the X-ray diffraction (Fig. 6). Figure 6a represents the diffraction peaks at 2θ values of 30.2°, 35.5°, 43.3°, 53.7°, 57.2° and 62.9° correspond to (022), (113), (004), (224), (115) and (044) crystal planes of nanomagnetite. Fe3O4 has crystalline cubic spinel structure which agrees with the standard Fe3O4 XRD spectrum (JCPDS No. 65-3107). The same patterns of characteristic peaks were observed for Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs (Fig. 6b), demonstrating that the embedded magnetite cores keep their crystalline phase after SiO2 covering. Finally, the XRD pattern of Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb (Fig. 6c,d) was investigated to determine the crystal structure. The X-ray diffraction pattern showed amorphous states and phases. To be sure, the XRD was repeated by another device and the results were the same. Accordingly, the synthesized nanocomposite has an amorphous structure.

Fig. 6
figure 6

XRD patterns of (a) Fe3O4, (b) Fe3O4@SiO2 and (c), (d) Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb

Reductive coupling of nitroarenes to azoxyarenes

Initially, the trimetallic nanocomposite was prepared according to our previous research on the successful synthesis of LDHs with a combination of three cations on the surface of nanomagnetic cores. The main reason of choosing these metals is to provide three efficient cations for the synthesis of LDH-like nanocomposites and to observe their catalytic activity in various organic reactions. Due to this, the novel nanomagnetic Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb catalyst has been successfully synthesized and characterized. The catalytic activity of prepared core–shell nanoparticles was investigated by the reductive coupling of nitrobenzenes to azoxybenzenes. This research was started with the primary aim of using the nanocatalyst to reduce nitroarenes to the corresponding anilines with sodium borohydride. Therefore, the reduction of nitrobenzene with reducing agent was selected as a model reaction in the presence of different catalytic amounts of nanocatalyst. At first, it was amazing to get orange red solution instead of aniline as an expected product. During further studies, the instrumental analysis confirmed the formation of azoxybenzene as a single product. The summarized results in Table 1 show the effect of some parameters on the model reaction. In the absence of the catalyst, the reaction showed no improvement. In order to study the effect of solvent, the model reaction is carried out in various solvents in the presence of heterogeneous nanocatalyst. Investigations revealed the optimal conditions for the synthesis of azoxybenzene. The starting compound was completely consumed using NaBH4/H2O system under reflux conditions in the presence of the Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb MNPs (Table 1, entry 11). The examinations exhibited that using nitrobenzene (1 mmol), Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb MNPs (20 mg) and NaBH4 (2 mmol) in refluxing water as a green solvent performs azoxybenzene within 3 min in 93% yield (Table 2, entry 1).

Table 1 Optimization experiments for reductive coupling of nitrobenzene to azoxybenzene with NaBH4/Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb NPs system under different reaction conditions
figure a
Table 2 Chemoselective hydrogenation of nitroarenes with NaBH4/Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb/H2O system

In the next step, the usability and generality of this study were investigated by the reduction of structurally diverse nitroarenes under optimized reaction conditions. The results show that in all cases, reductive coupling of nitroarenes occurred and the corresponding products were obtained in high yields (Table 2). The examinations revealed that nitroaromatic compounds (1 mmol) can be reduced using NaBH4 (2 mmol) and Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb MNPs (20 mg) in refluxing water within 2–10 min to provide azoxybenzenes in 83–93% yields.

The series of control experiments on the model reaction were investigated with Fe3O4, SiO2, Co–Zr–Sb, Fe3O4@SiO2 and SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb to illustrate that which part is the main catalytic site. The results revealed that the Co–Zr–Sb NPs immobilized on silica-layered magnetite is the most efficient catalyst and the other parts can react in longer time than the original reaction and of course the synthesis of azoxybenzenes cannot progress as well as the reported catalyst.

In addition, the synthesis of magnetic trimetallic catalyst was performed using the co-precipitation method. The molar ratios of Co/Zr/Sb were suggested in accordance with the proposed procedures for the synthesis of layered double hydroxides (LDHs) [32, 38]. Due to our experience with LDHs, we selected the appropriate molar ratio of cations in the catalyst formation. The synthesized nanocatalyst has three layers, each layer is coated on the other, and the analysis techniques can confirm this.

In order to study the suitability of this approach, the reductive coupling of nitrobenzene to azoxybenzene by NaBH4/Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb MNPs system was compared with previously reported methods (Table 3). The current investigation shows advantages in terms of recoverability and reusability of the nanocatalyst, green reaction conditions, selective product formation, high yields and short reaction times.

Table 3 Comparison of the current protocol for the reductive coupling of nitrobenzene to azoxybenzene with other reported systems
figure b

Although the exact mechanism of this synthetic method is unclear, we propose the following plausible pathway for the one-pot reductive coupling of nitroarenes (Scheme 4). Reduction of nitrobenzenes to nitrosobenzenes (1) and phenylhydroxylamines (2) was taken place by the absorption of hydrogen on the surface of nanocatalyst, selectively. In the next step and through the activation of intermediates, the condensation of nitrosoarenes and arylhydroxyamines produced the corresponding azoxybenzenes with water loss.

Scheme 4
scheme 4

A plausible mechanism for reductive coupling of nitrobenzenes to azoxybenzenes

Recycling of Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb catalyst

The economic and green aspect of this procedure was examined by the reusability of Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb MNPs in reductive coupling of nitroarene to azoxyarene under the optimized reaction conditions (Table 1, entry 11). After completion of the reaction, the nanocatalyst was magnetically separated from the reaction mixture, washed with EtOAc and then dried to use in the next runs. The catalyst can be reused for four consecutive cycles without the remarkable loss of catalytic activity (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Recycling of nanomagnetic-Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb NPs in chemoselective hydrogenation of nitrobenzene

In addition, to study the reusability and durability of Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb MNPs, FT-IR spectrum (Fig. 8) and SEM image (Fig. 9) of the recycled nanomagnetic catalyst was investigated. The results revealed that the structure of nanocatalyst is almost constant.

Fig. 8
figure 8

FT-IR spectrum of nanomagnetic-Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb after the second recovery

Fig. 9
figure 9

SEM image of nanomagnetic-Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb after the second recovery

Experimental section

All chemical substrates were purchased from chemical companies and were used without further purification. 1H NMR spectrum was measured by Bruker Avance spectrometer (300 MHz), and FT-IR spectra were obtained by Thermo Nicolet Nexus 670 apparatus. Mass spectra of the samples were obtained by mass spectrometer (Agilent, 5973 N, 20–70 eV). Morphology and size distribution of the particles were examined by SEM using FESEM-TESCAN and FESEM-ZEISS. Elemental composition of the sample was determined using EDX analysis. Magnetic properties of nanoparticles were measured by a vibration sample magnetometer (VSM, model MDKFT). TEM images were captured on a microscope (Zeiss EM10C) at accelerating voltage of 100 kV. The crystalline structure of the nanocatalyst was surveyed by X-ray diffraction on a Philips PANalytical X’Pert Pro diffractometer in a range of Bragg’s angle (2θ = 5°–80°). TLC was utilized for reaction monitoring over silica gel 60 F254 aluminum sheet.

Synthesis of Fe3O4 NPs

Magnetite nanoparticles were synthesized by a chemical co-precipitation of chloride salts [54]. Commonly, a solution of 2.147 g of FeCl2·4H2O (0.0108 mol) and 5.838 g of FeCl3·6H2O (0.0216 mol) was prepared in H2O (100 mL). The solution was stirred at 85 °C under N2 atmosphere for 10 min. Next, by the addition of aqueous ammonia (25 wt%, 10 mL), the nanoparticles of Fe3O4 were immediately precipitated. The resulting mixture was stirred at 85 °C under N2 atmosphere for 30 min. The mixture was cooled to the ambient temperature and nanoparticles of Fe3O4 were magnetically separated. Magnetite was washed twice with a solution of NaCl and H2O.

Synthesis of Fe3O4@SiO2 NPs

SiO2 layer was covered on the surface of Fe3O4 core according to the reported method [55]. Magnetite (1.5 g) was dispersed in water (20 mL); the suspension was added to 2-propanol (200 mL) and then homogenized by ultrasonic for 30 min. Under continuous stirring, polyethylene glycol-400 (5.36 g), H2O (20 mL), aqueous ammonia (28 wt%, 10 mL) and tetraethyl orthosilicate (2 mL) were added sequentially into the suspension. The mixture was stirred for 28 h at ambient temperature. After completion of reaction, the product was magnetically separated and washed with H2O and EtOH.

Synthesis of immobilized Co–Zr–Sb NPs on silica-coated magnetite (Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb NPs)

Co–Zr–Sb trimetallic nanoparticles immobilized on SiO2-layered Fe3O4 have been prepared by the in situ growth method. Typically, 0.160 g of sodium hydroxide (0.004 mol), 1.060 g of sodium carbonate (0.01 mol) and 0.25 g of Fe3O4@SiO2 were dispersed in 40 mL of H2O. Another solution of Co(NO3)2·6H2O (4.365 g, 0.015 mol), ZrCl4 (0.349 g, 0.0015 mol) and SbF3 (0.625 g, 0.0035 mol) in 40 mL of H2O was prepared. Both of suspensions and solutions were sonicated for 60 min. Then, in a mean time and drop-wisely, they were added to a round-bottomed flask containing magnetic stirrer and water (40 mL). The resulting slurry was stirred for further 30 min at ambient temperature and subsequently was stored for 24 h at 80 °C. The mixture was cooled to the ambient temperature and then filtered. Next, the product was dried at 50 °C to afford Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb MNPs as a solid material in 3.15 g.

A typical procedure for the chemoselective hydrogenation of nitrobenzene

A mixture of 20 mg of Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb MNPs and 0.123 g of nitrobenzene (1 mmol) in 2 mL of water was stirred for a minute. Next, NaBH4 (0.076 g, 2 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred under reflux conditions for 3 min. The formation of azoxybenzene was determined by changing the color of the mixture to orange red. TLC indicated the progress of reaction (EtOAc/n-hexane: 2/5). Next, the mixture was cooled to the room temperature. The nanocatalyst was magnetically separated, and the reaction mixture was then extracted with ethyl acetate (2 × 5 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Evaporation of solvent provided pure azoxybenzene in 93% yield (Table 2, entry 1).

Conclusions

In conclusion, the novel efficient Fe3O4@SiO2@Co–Zr–Sb catalyst has been developed for the chemoselective hydrogenation of nitroarenes to azoxyarenes under green conditions using NaBH4 as a hydrogen donor. The recoverable heterogeneous nanocatalyst has been characterized using FT-IR, SEM, EDX, VSM, TEM and XRD analyses. Reductive coupling of nitrobenzenes was carried out successfully within 2–10 min to give products in good to high yields. Undoubtedly, this practical approach can open a new way for proper and green reduction of nitroarenes to azoxyarenes. This synthetic procedure offers several advantages in terms of mild reaction conditions, short reaction times, absence of hazardous organic solvents, using water as a green solvent and reusability of the magnetic nanocatalyst.