Introduction

Diatoms are major contributors to oceanic primary production (Field et al. 1998; Smetacek 1999). Their ubiquity and dominance in coastal and upwelling regions indicate that diatoms possess unique adaptive strategies (Crombet et al. 2011; Kooistra and Medlin 2007; Margalef 1978). Indeed, it has been suggested that diatoms are unusual in their growth efficiency at low light intensities (Furnas 1990), but biochemical and physiological mechanisms that support this idea have not been identified (Bowler et al. 2010).

Photoacclimation involves generally predictable changes in pigment concentration and photosynthetic rates that function to balance light absorption with downstream carbon metabolism (Behrenfeld et al. 2008; Geider 1987; Vandenhecke et al. 2015). By definition, cells that are photoacclimated to their light environment have achieved balanced growth because their physiology has adjusted to reach equilibrium (MacIntyre and Cullen 2005). Studies on photoacclimation lead to quantitative descriptions of growth for estimates and predictions of the marine carbon cycle (Flynn 2001; Geider et al. 1998, 2009) and can reveal new metabolic mechanisms that function to optimize phytoplankton growth (Six et al. 2008; Su et al. 2012; Wagner et al. 2006).

Following light absorption, photosynthesis is initiated by the light-dependent excitation of an electron originating from the splitting of H2O. These high-energy electrons are passed from PSII through an electron transport chain terminating at NADP+ to form NADPH. As with respiratory electron transport, a proton motive force is created in the process of photosynthetic electron transport and used to generate ATP. NADPH and ATP fuel CO2 fixation through the Calvin Benson cycle. However, the stoichiometry of ATP:NADPH produced through photosynthesis may not perfectly match the requirements for CO2 fixation and other metabolic demands that vary depending on environmental conditions. Additional ATP can be generated through alternative pathways including light-dependent respiration (LDR) and cyclic PSI electron transport (Allen 2003; Asada 1999). LDR pathways include midstream oxidase activity and the Mehler reaction which enhance the proton motive force across the thylakoid membrane. In addition, the malate valve transfers reducing equivalents from the plastid directly to the mitochondrial respiratory electron transport chain. These alternative pathways function only in the light, circumvent carbon fixation, and can significantly influence the efficiency of light energy conversion to biomass (Halsey and Jones 2015; Kunath et al. 2012).

Prihoda suggested that inter-organelle transfers of carbon and electrons might be a mechanism that diatoms use to fine-tune their energy balance (ATP:NADPH) (Prihoda et al. 2012). Features of diatoms that support this idea include (1) reports of high growth efficiencies in diatoms (Furnas 1990; Wagner et al. 2006), (2) chloroplasts and mitochondria that are tightly appressed, in contrast to many other microalgae (Prihoda et al. 2012), (3) some carbon metabolism enzymes that are located in the cytosol, as opposed to the plastids (Wilhelm et al. 2006), (4) a subset of these enzymes participate in interconnecting primary carbon pathways: the glycolytic, pentose phosphate, and Calvin Benson pathways, (5) evidence for a full glycolytic pathway within diatom mitochondria (Smith et al. 2012), and (6) sensitivity of photosynthesis to disruption of mitochondrial terminal oxidase activity (Bailleul et al. 2015). These unique features of diatom carbon metabolism are postulated to facilitate flexible and highly responsive intracellular control of carbon and energy flux (Singh et al. 2015). While these observations and the ecology of diatoms have been linked by conjecture, as yet, no evidence for mechanisms underlying high growth efficiency of diatoms at low light, or the implementation of efficient pathways at low light, has been reported.

One reason that pathways altering growth efficiency are elusive to measure is that photosynthetic cells typically employ many other controls that are responsive to environmental conditions and alter photosynthetic properties. Changes in cellular pigment and carbon content and their effects on fundamental measurements of photosynthesis during light-limited growth are well described (MacIntyre et al. 2002; Laws and Bannister 1980). However, a more complete accounting of the total energy harvested through photosynthesis and how that energy is used to fuel growth processes across a wide range of growth-limiting irradiances can help understand variability in commonly collected data such as photosynthesis–irradiance (PE) relationships (Halsey et al. 2010; Behrenfeld et al. 2008), the caloric content of biomass (Halsey et al. 2011; Jakob et al. 2007), and energy use efficiencies (Halsey and Jones 2015).

In this study we simultaneously quantified many properties of photosynthetic energy use in light-limited cultures of the model diatom, Thalassiosira pseudonana, which enabled an accurate accounting of the distribution of energy through interconnected metabolic pathways. The results confirmed that T. pseudonana is highly efficient at converting harvested light energy to biomass and provided direct evidence for mechanisms that can shift the flow of carbon or electrons to shorter, more efficient pathways at low light levels. Some of these metabolic shifts may be specific to diatoms, while others (especially growth rate-dependent carbon metabolism) appear to be shared by many microalgae.

Materials and methods

Culture conditions and characteristics

A complete listing of abbreviations used throughout this manuscript is provided in Table 1. For brevity, and by convention, production measures with a superscripted ‘b’ indicate values normalized to chlorophyll_a concentration (Chla), and a superscripted ‘C’ indicates production values normalized to carbon content (Table 1).

Table 1 Abbreviations and definitions of properties measured in this study

Thalassiosira pseudonana (Hustedt) Hasle et Heimdal CCMP 1355 was grown in 300 ml continuous culturing systems at 18 °C using f/2 + Si medium (Guillard 1975) supplemented with Na2SeO3 at 0.17 μM concentration. Nitrate and phosphate concentrations in the media reservoir were 250 and 50 µM, respectively (Laws and Bannister 1980). Data were collected from at least three independent continuous cultures grown at a constant light intensity of 200, 60, or 5 µmol photons m−2 s−1. Cultures were first grown under each light intensity to determine the light-dependent growth rates. For continuous cultures, growth rates were maintained by setting peristaltic pumps to administer media at flow rates according to the equation

$$\mu = \frac{D}{V},$$

where μ is the specific growth rate (day−1), D is flow rate (ml day−1), and V is culture volume (300 ml). Light was supplied by cool-white fluorescent tubes and intensities were measured with a quantum meter (Biospherical Instruments QSL-100) with a 4π spherical quantum sensor. Cultures were continuously bubbled to keep cells in suspension, exposed to the same average light intensity, and to ensure that CO2 was not limiting. All cultures were acclimated to their growth irradiances for at least 10 generations. Steady-state growth was verified by the measurement of cell concentrations that varied <5 % over 3 days before performing experiments. Cell concentration, diameter, and volume were measured using a Multisizer 3 Coulter Counter equipped with a 100-µm aperture tube (Beckman Coulter; Miami, FL).

Chla was determined in triplicate by filtering 4–6 ml culture onto a 25 mm glass fiber filter (Whatman GF/F) that was extracted overnight at −20 °C in 90 % acetone. Absorptivity was measured by spectrophotometry and Chla was quantified according to the equation from Ritchie (2006). The Chla-specific spectrally averaged absorption coefficient (āb) was measured by the filter pad method with corresponding path length corrections (Mitchell et al. 2003). There were no significant differences in āb calculated using the spectral distributions of different light sources (cool-white fluorescent tubes vs. Eiko 2450 ELH 300 W 120 V halogen bulbs (Shawnee, KS) used in collection of photosynthetic irradiance (PE) data (see below)).

Cellular carbon and nitrogen were measured using 2, 3, and 4 ml culture samples, filtered onto precombusted GF/F filters. Culture filtrate (4 ml) was also analyzed for background subtraction. Samples were measured on an Exeter Analytical EA1 elemental analyzer (Coventry, England). NPPC was calculated as the product of specific growth rate (μ) and cellular carbon values according to the equation

$${\text{NPP}}_{\text{C}} = \mu {\text{C}}.$$

Photosynthesis–irradiance (PE) determinations

PE relationships were determined by short-term exposures of culture samples to ranges of light intensities while measuring O2 production or 14C-uptake. We used membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS) and the 18O2:16O2 method to simultaneously quantify gross O2 production (\({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}\)), net O2 production, and LDR (Halsey et al. 2010, 2013). A 150–200 ml culture sample was concentrated to approximately 5 ml using a 2-µm polycarbonate membrane filter and a 47-mm GF/F backing filter. During concentration, cells were kept in suspension to further minimize cell stress. The concentrated sample and the 18O2 tracer (final concentration of 40–70 µM) were added to a 5-ml Dubinsky chamber (Dubinsky et al. 1987). The sample was continuously stirred at ~8 Hz using a magnetic stir bar and incubated at 20 °C. The chamber was mounted to the membrane inlet system and attached to a Prisma QMS-200 (Pfeiffer) quadrupole mass spectrometer with a closed ion source and electron multiplier detector for recording mass/charge (m/z) ratios of 32 (16O2), 36 (18O2), and 40 (Ar). All sample incubations began with a 5-min dark period to confirm highly similar rates of 16O2 and 18O2 consumption in the dark (DR, dark respiration). Concentrated cell suspensions were exposed to set ranges of nine target light levels (4 min per light level) that corresponded with culture growth intensities. For cultures grown at 5 µmol photons m−2 s−1, suspensions were exposed to light intensities ranging from approximately 3–200 µmol photons m−2 s−1. For cultures grown at 60 µmol photons m−2 s−1, light exposures ranged from 5 to 650 µmol photons m−2 s−1, and for cultures grown at 200 µmol photons m−2 s−1, light exposures ranged from approximately 12 to 1500 µmol photons m−2 s−1. PE curves for \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}\) and \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}\) were modeled using a hyperbolic tangent (Smith and Platt 1984). At the completion of each experiment, the concentrated culture sample was retained for measurement of Chla. Net O2 production was determined from 16O2 signals. \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}\) production was determined from 16O2 and 18O2 signals in the light. LDR was determined by difference in 18O2 signals in the light and dark. Rates of oxygen production and consumption were calculated by dividing the observed rates by the fraction of 16O2 or 18O2 present during each light exposure to account for changes in isotope dilution throughout the experiment.

To account for variations in the cell densities and Chla of concentrated culture suspensions added to the Dubinsky chamber, Chla versus light intensity relationships were determined for cells grown at each of the three growth irradiances. First, cultures were concentrated by filtration to cell concentrations exceeding that used in MIMS experiments and transferred to the chamber. The light level associated with each neutral density filter was measured using a 4π sensor inserted into the chamber. The concentrated cell suspension was subsequently diluted and light and Chla levels re-measured. This process was repeated four times and resulted in a set of equations for each neutral density filter and cells grown at the three different irradiances. These equations were used to calculate the actual light exposures used in each MIMS experiment.

For short-term (20 min) 14C-uptake experiments, 5 ml culture sample was diluted with 8 ml f/2 + Si media and spiked with 5 µCi NaH14CO3. The 14C-spiked sample was aliquoted to 14 six ml scintillation vials and exposed to an appropriate range of 10 light intensities (0–500 µmol photons m−2 s−1 for cells grown at the lowest light intensity, 0–1500 µmol photons m−2 s−1 for cells grown at the higher light intensities) from two tungsten projector bulbs using a photosynthetron (CHPT Mfg Inc; Georgetown, DE) for 20 min at 20 °C. Light intensities were measured using a 4π PAR sensor. After incubation, all samples were acidified with 10 % HCl and allowed to degas overnight. To measure total activity of the radioactive label added to the samples, two 50 µl subsamples of the inoculated sample were added to 50 µl phenethylamine and 900 µl H2O.

Other photosynthesis measurements and calculations

To quantify dissolved organic carbon excretion rates (DO14C), a 30.2 ml culture sample was inoculated with 10 µCi NaH14CO, and 5 ml aliquoted into each of six vials. Three of the vials were wrapped with foil for “dark” controls, and three were incubated at the growth irradiance at 18 °C for 24 h. Two subsamples were collected and measured for total activity of radioactive label. After 24 h, samples were gently filtered through GF/F filters. The filtrate was acidified with 10 % HCl and degassed overnight. Total activity was determined for all samples as described above.

Photosynthetic energy (NADPH) used directly for NO3 and SO4 2− reduction (DUNS) was accounted for by first using cellular N from the CHN analysis and an assumed N:S ratio of 16:1.3 (Ho et al. 2003) according to the equation

$${\text{DU}}_{\text{NS}} = [(2\mu (N + S)) + {\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }} ]({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }} )^{ - 1} ,$$

where 2 is a factor derived from the eight electrons required to reduce NO3 or SO4 2− and four electrons released per O2 molecule formed from the water-splitting reaction at PSII. Resultant DUNS values were used to calculate gross carbon fixation (GPC) with the equation

$${\text{GP}}_{\text{C}} = \left( {{\text{GP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }} - {\text{LDR}}} \right)\left( {{\text{DU}}_{\text{NS}} } \right)^{ - 1} .$$

The amount of energy used for NO3 and SO4 2− reduction is thus determined by

$$\left( {{\text{GP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }} - {\text{LDR}}} \right) - {\text{GP}}_{\text{C}}.$$

DUNS values were also used to convert net O2 production to carbon units (\({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}\)) to allow direct comparisons between GPC, measures of \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}\), and NPPC following the equation

$${\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}} = ({\text{net}}\;{\text{O}}_{2} \;{\text{production}})\left( {{\text{DU}}_{\text{NS}} } \right)^{ - 1}.$$

Maintenance mitochondrial respiration (MMR) is organic carbon respired to CO2 when incubated at the growth intensity and was calculated as

$${\text{MMR}} = {\text{GP}}_{\text{C}} - {\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}} .$$

Variable fluorescence [F V/F M = (F M − F O)/F M] was determined using fast repetition rate fluorometry [FRRf; (Kolber et al. 1998) after samples were dark incubated for 5 min prior to initial fluorescence (F O) and maximal fluorescence (F M) measurements. F O is Chla fluorescence when functional PSII reaction centers are fully oxidized, and F M is the Chla fluorescence when the reaction centers are reduced. Sigma (σ PSII) was also recorded to monitor the functional absorption cross section of PSII.

Biochemical fractionation

14C-pulse labeling experiments were done to measure incorporation of labeled carbon into different macromolecular pools. Culture samples (60.2 ml) were spiked with 15 µCi NaH14CO, aliquoted into three-20 ml vials, and incubated at the growth irradiance at 18 °C for 20 min. Cells were filtered onto GF/F filters, rinsed three times with 10 ml f/2 + Si media, and frozen at −20 °C for later extraction, fractionation, and quantification (Smith and Geider 1985). Two activity subsamples were collected and measured using the procedure described above. Filters were dried under the flow hood overnight then 1.5 ml 2:1 (v/v) chloroform:methanol added and samples extracted at −20 °C for 12–24 h. The extracted sample was filtered through a GF/F filter that was rinsed twice with 2:1 chloroform:methanol. 1 ml dH2O was added to the filtrate before centrifuging at 1400 rpm (Eppendorf 5418, USA Scientific) for 5 min. The top layer containing the lipid fraction was transferred to a scintillation vial. The aqueous/alcohol layer containing LMW metabolites was transferred to a second scintillation vial. The two filters were placed into a scintillation vial and extracted in 2 ml 5 % trichloroacetic acid (TCA) at 80 °C for 60 min. This hot TCA extract was filtered through another GF/F and rinsed 2× with 2 ml 5 % TCA leaving 3 filters in one vial containing the protein fraction. The filtrate contained the carbohydrate and some nucleic acids and was evaporated to about 2 ml.

Cellular protein and carbohydrate assays supplemented 20 min pulse-label experiments. For protein assays, 8–10 ml culture was filtered in duplicate on a 25-mm Durapore PVDF membrane filter (Merck Millipore, Tullagreen, Ireland) and then stored at −80 °C. Upon thaw, 0.6 ml 0.2 μm filtered artificial seawater and 0.6 ml 0.2 M NaOH were added to each filter. Samples were vortexed, sonicated for 15 min, and heated at 100 °C for 20 min. Following centrifugation at 17,000×g, 0.8 ml supernatant was collected, and protein content was measured spectrophotometrically using a Thermo Scientific Pierce Micro BCA Protein Assay Kit (Eugene, OR, USA) with bovine serum albumin as standards.

For carbohydrate determination, 20–30 ml culture was filtered in duplicate onto a combusted GF/C filter and stored at −20 °C for later extraction. Filters were thawed and then incubated in 5 ml 0.05 M H2SO4 for 20 min at 60 °C. Extracts were filtered onto a GF/C to collect cellular β-1,3-glucan and stored at 4 °C (Granum et al. 2002). The original filter containing cell wall polysaccharide was washed with dH2O and then dried at 60 °C overnight. After drying, the polysaccharide was hydrolyzed using 0.5 ml 80 % H2SO4 at 0–4 °C for 20 h, 6 ml ice cold H2O was added, and the solution was filtered onto another GF/C to collect cell wall hydrolyzate. 0.5 ml 3 % aqueous phenol and 5 ml concentrated sulfuric acid were added and allowed to stand for 30 min before measuring absorption at 485 nm. Standards were measured using analytical grade d-(+)glucose (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Across all growth rates, structural cell wall carbohydrates were less than 5 % of total carbohydrate. For comparison to pulse-labeled carbohydrate measurements, cell wall and cellular β-1,3-glucan fractions were combined to yield total carbohydrate fractions.

Results

Light-limited continuous cultures of T. pseudonana were grown at 5, 60, and 200 µmol photons m−2 s−1 yielding specific growth rates of 0.20, 0.85, and 1.54 d−1, respectively. These growth rates achieved using constant light conditions (Table 1) were remarkably similar to growth rates achieved for T. pseudonana and T. oceanica grown under 12:12 light–dark sinusoidal cycles with average daily photosynthetically available radiation about the same as the growth intensities used in our study (Vandenhecke et al. 2015). The similarity in these growth rates (as well as many of the basic cell characteristics) under different light cycle regimes suggests that our application of continuous light is valid for evaluating photosynthetic energy use and applying the results to broader ecological settings, at least for these diatoms.

Chla decreased from 6.27 μg cell−1 in the lowest light-acclimated cultures to 1.64 μg cell−1 in the highest light-acclimated cultures. The decrease in cellular Chla with the increasing growth irradiance is a common characteristic of photoacclimation that was also reflected in the strong decrease in Chla:C with the increasing light-limited growth rate (Table 2). Constant C:N across growth rates confirmed that nitrogen was nonlimiting and was in agreement with previous studies on light-limited algae (Bartual and Gálvez 2002; Berges and Falkowski 1998; Sarthou et al. 2005). Thus, the behaviors reported here are attributable to physiological responses to light limitation.

Table 2 Light-limited cell characteristics in T. pseudonana

The light dependence of cellular Chla:C was also reflected in the 12-fold decrease in Chla-specific NPPC (NPP bC ) between cells growing at 1.54 and 0.20 d−1, mirroring the 12-fold decrease in growth irradiances (Table 2). However, the decrease in NPP bC with the decreasing light-limited growth rate was not associated with changes in photosynthetic efficiency at PSII measured by F V/F M. F V/F M was maximal across all light-limited growth rates and was accompanied by only slight decreases in σ PSII with the increasing growth irradiance (Table 2). The relative numbers of active PSII reaction centers (nPSII) were derived from the quotient of F o and σ PSII (Oxborough et al. 2012; Silsbe et al. 2015) and expressed normalized to Chla and C for each light-limited growth rate (Table 2). nPSII Chla −1 did not change with light intensity, but nPSII C−1 decreased with increasing light intensity. The āb values increased with irradiance from 0.0081 m2 mg Chla −1 in the lowest light-limited cells to 0.0185 m2 mg Chla −1 in cells acclimated to the highest light intensity, a result that was likely a consequence of higher photoprotective pigment content in cells growing at higher light intensities (MacIntyre et al. 2002).

PE curves were generated from measurements of \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}\), \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}\) and short-term (20 min) 14C-uptake. These data were normalized to Chla (Fig. 1a–c) and cell carbon (Fig. 1d–f) to understand how photosynthetic energy is partitioned among the various metabolic demands of light-limited growth (Fig. 1). P bmax from \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) and \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}^{\text{b}}\) strongly increased, but αb remained constant with light-limited growth rate (Fig. 1a, b; Table 3). These well-characterized behaviors in PE parameters caused E k to shift strongly with growth irradiance (Table 3) and is, therefore, known as ‘Ek-dependent variability’ (Behrenfeld et al. 2004). Maximum rates of Chla-specific 20 min 14C-uptake also increased with light-limited growth rate, but both P bmax and αb determined from Chla-specific 14C-uptake significantly increased with light-limited growth rate (Fig. 1c). Nevertheless, the parallel shifts in those PE parameters were insufficient to overcome growth rate-dependent changes in E k (Table 3). Production at the growth irradiance (P bIg ) was determined for each of the production metrics using the equations obtained by regression analysis. P bIg increased dramatically with growth rate in all three production metrics (Table 3). For cells grown at each light-limited growth rate, P bIg decreased from \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) to \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}^{\text{b}}\) and to Chla-specific 14C-uptake.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PE relationships for light-limited T. pseudonana growing at 0.2 d−1 (downward triangles), 0.85 d−1 (open circles), and 1.5 d−1 (filled circles) generated from measurements of \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) (a), \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}^{\text{b}}\) (b), and Chla-specific 20 min 14C-uptake (c). PE relationships for \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{C}}\) (d), \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}^{\text{C}}\) (e), and C-specific 20 min 14C-uptake (f) for cells growing at the same three light-limited growth rates

Table 3 Production values and PE parameters in T. pseudonana grown to three light-limited steady-state growth rates

Cells grown at the lowest light-limited growth rate consistently showed higher αC values when compared to cells grown at higher light-limited growth rates (Fig. 1d–f; Table 3). This result reflects the positive relationship between αC and Chla:C (MacIntyre et al. 2002). Carbon-specific PE data also provide a direct comparison to specific growth rate achieved for each light-limited culture. \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{C}}\) will always overestimate specific growth rate because it is the sum of NPPC and all of the energetic processes, including respiratory processes for ATP production, needed to fuel growth and division. However, because \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}^{\text{C}}\) and 14C-uptake assess photosynthesis further downstream of the initial photosynthetic reactions, P CIg for both \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}^{\text{C}}\) and C-specific 14C-uptake provided reasonably good estimates of specific growth rate in light-limited cultures (Table 3).

Regardless of growth rate or the normalization factor (Chla or carbon) used in generating the PE relationships, αb and αC were always higher in \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}\) than \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}\) or 14C-uptake determinations (Fig. 1). Finally, the maximum quantum efficiency (ϕ m) determined from \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) was 0.10 mol O2 (mol photons)−1 in cells growing at 0.20 d−1 and declined to 0.048 mol O2 (mol photons)−1 in cells growing at 1.54 d−1 (Table 3). ϕ m determined from \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}^{\text{b}}\) similarly decreased 50 %, but ϕ m determined from Chla-specific 14C-uptake decreased only 22 % between cells growing at the slowest and fastest light-limited growth rates (Table 3). Values of ϕ m determined from \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}^{\text{b}}\) and Chla-specific 14C-uptake were lower when compared to ϕ m determined from \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}\) at each light-limited growth rate.

P bIg determined from \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) and NPP bC for cells growing at each of the three light-limited growth rates strongly increased with light availability (Fig. 2a). These trends reversed when normalized to absorbed light using āb (Fig. 2a). The additional measurements of LDRb, energy used for nitrate and sulfate reduction (DUNS), and P bIg from NP bO/C were used to evaluate how energy is allocated to major metabolic sinks across a wide range of light-limited growth rates. Whether normalized to Chla or absorbed light, the dramatic changes in production with light-limited growth rate (Fig. 2a; Table 3) make it difficult to compare differences in energy allocation between growth rates. Therefore, all production values were normalized to \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) to show how photosynthetic energy was allocated to each of the major metabolic sinks across all growth rates (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2
figure 2

a P bIg for T. pseudonana growing at each of the three light-limited growth rates from \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) (filled diamonds) and NPP bC (filled squares) determined from cellular carbon. P *Ig values calculated using āb from \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{*}\) (open diamonds) and NPP *C determined from cellular carbon. b \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) (filled diamonds), GP bC (filled triangles), \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}^{\text{b}}\) (open circles), and NPP bC (filled squares) shown as fractions of \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\). Differences between these production measures are used to quantify energy allocated to LDR (light gray area), energy used for nitrate and sulfate reduction (dark gray area), MMR (yellow area), carbon catabolism for biosynthesis (blue area), and biomass (green area)

Across all growth rates, the majority of energy derived through photosynthesis was retained in biomass carbon (Fig. 2, NPPC, square symbols, green area). NPPC:\({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}\) was 0.57 in cells growing at the slowest growth rate and 0.70 in cells growing at the faster growth rates. In other words, 57 and 70 % of \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}\) were retained as organic carbon in cells growing at the slowest and fastest growth rates, respectively. A constant 5 % of \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}\) was used for reducing nitrate and sulfate (dark gray area) across all growth rates. The remaining energy derived from photosynthesis was allocated to oxygen and carbon consuming pathways that shifted in proportion depending on light-limited growth rate.

The fraction of \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}\) used for oxygen consumption pathways increased with the decreasing light-limited growth rates. LDR increased from 5 to 12 % of \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}\) with the decreasing growth rate (Fig. 2b, light gray area). Similarly, the fraction of \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}\) used for mitochondrial maintenance respiration (MMR; determined as the difference between GPC and \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}\), Fig. 2b, yellow area) increased from 2 % in cells growing at 1.54 d−1 to 8 % in cells growing at 0.20 d−1. The same trend was found for mitochondrial respiration rates measured in the dark (dark respiration, DR). However, DR was significantly greater than MMR in all cells regardless of the growth irradiance (Table 4). In contrast to energy allocated to respiratory pathways, the fraction of energy dedicated to carbon catabolism for biosynthesis (determined as the difference between \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}\) and NPPC) did not change between growth rates (Fig. 2, blue area).

Table 4 Light-dependent and mitochondrial respiration in light-limited T. pseudonana

Carbon excretion is another potential fate for photosynthetic energy. We measured DO14C accumulation in the filtrate of cultures incubated with NaH14CO3 at their respective growth irradiances for 24 h. Across all growth rates, less than 2 % of \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}\) was lost as DO14C (data not shown). Although some DO14C could have been trapped on the filters, they were rinsed several times with media, and particulate organic carbon values determined from filters were never higher than cellular C determined by elemental analysis, suggesting that DO14C was not collected on filters.

Subcellular carbon allocation to different macromolecular pools varied dramatically depending on the time scale of the measurement. First, cells were incubated with NaH14CO3 for 20 min (pulse labeling) to trace the fate of newly fixed carbon into carbohydrates, proteins, and lipid pools. In cells growing at the faster growth rates, the majority of newly fixed carbon was allocated to total carbohydrates and proteins (Fig. 3a). Very little newly fixed carbon was initially allocated to lipid biosynthesis in cells growing at any of the three light-limited growth rates (Fig. 3a). Regardless of growth rate, the aqueous alcohol fraction containing LMW metabolites was ≤3.0 % of the combined labeled macromolecular pools. Together, newly fixed carbohydrate, protein, and lipid pools matched gross carbon production (GPC) in cells growing at 0.85 and 1.54 d−1. In contrast, the sum of the three carbon pools was 3.3-fold less than GPC in cells growing at 0.20 d−1.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Macromolecular composition of T. pseudonana growing at three light-limited growth rates: 0.2 d−1 (light gray bars), 0.85 d−1 (medium gray bars), 1.54 d−1 (dark gray bars) determined in cells pulse labeled for 20 min (top) and in biomass (bottom). Carbon content for carbohydrate, protein, and lipid were compared to bulk measures of GPC (top) and cell carbon (bottom). Biomass lipid pools (striped bars) were estimated

The macromolecular composition of the biomass of light-limited cells showed that the fraction of carbon allocated to biomass protein increased strongly with decreasing growth rate (Fig. 3b). Because the volume of culture needed to measure lipids was too large relative to the total culture volume, the amount of lipid in biomass was estimated by difference using the known cellular carbon values and the sum of total carbohydrate and protein fractions. This is likely an overestimation, but it provided an approximation of the amount of carbon allocated to the long-term lipid fraction. These carbon pools were also used to estimate the overall biochemical reduction state of the cells. The biomass carbon of cells growing at the slowest and middle growth rates was twofold to fourfold more reduced than newly fixed carbon, while the fastest growing cells maintained an equivalent biochemical reduction state despite changes in the relative concentrations of protein and lipids in newly fixed and long-term carbon (Table 5).

Table 5 The biochemical reduction state of newly fixed and long-term cell carbon

Discussion

Photosynthetic efficiencies and the various fates of photosynthetic energy were studied in T. pseudonana across a wide range of steady-state light-limited growth rates. A collection of oxygen and carbon production measurements, including \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}\), LDR, \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}\), and NPPC, together with information about pigment content and time-dependent changes in cellular carbon pools, were used to understand mechanisms diatoms use to tune their photosynthetic metabolism in response to light limitation. This collection of measurements facilitated photosynthetic energy assessments at various stages between, and including, the initial water-splitting, oxygen-producing reaction, and biomass production. Across all light-limited growth rates, T. pseudonana adjusts its photosynthetic machinery and cellular metabolism to maximize the efficiency of light energy conversion into biomass. Our results reveal new information about light-dependent shifts in photosynthetic energy allocation. These data support the idea that diatoms have unique growth rate-dependent energy use strategies that contribute to their global success. The data also illustrate other energy allocation strategies that are shared by diatoms and other microalgae and used to respond to growth limitation. This work also shows that variability in PE parameters commonly used in productivity modeling is highly dependent on the metabolic measurement used to assess phytoplankton physiology.

Photoacclimation refers to fine-tuning of the light harvesting apparatus and downstream carbon metabolism to balance photosynthetic energy use in response to light availability. Several commonly observed characteristics of photoacclimation showed that our light-limited continuous cultures of T. pseudonana were fully acclimated to their light environments. For example, the constant F V/F M and strong increase in Chla:C with the decreasing growth rate followed trends observed by others (Geider et al. 1997; Laws and Bannister 1980; Suggett et al. 2009; Vandenhecke et al. 2015; Bittar et al. 2013). Although Chla:C increased 4.75-fold between cells growing at 1.54 and 0.20 d−1, σ PSII only increased slightly with the decreasing light-limited growth rate. Thus, as reflected in the relative changes in nPSII C−1 and nPSII Chl−1 (Table 2), cells increase numbers of PSII reaction centers and Chla with the decreasing growth intensity to maintain maximal photosynthetic efficiency at low light-limited growth rate (Suggett et al. 2009; Vandenhecke et al. 2015).

Behaviors in Chla-normalized PE relationships that are characteristics of photoacclimation, namely constant αb and variable P bmax causing major changes in E k, were observed at the level of \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) and \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) (Fig. 1a–c; Table 3). However, PE curves generated from Chla-specific short-term 14C-uptake rates showed αb increased significantly with light-limited growth rate, albeit to a lesser extent than increases in P bmax . Similar shifts in αb generated from \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) were observed in high and low-light-acclimated T. weissflogii, but the mechanism underlying that behavior was unknown (Post et al. 1985). Values of αb generated from 14C-uptake are influenced by the cellular lifetimes of newly fixed carbon, which are strongly influenced by metabolic demands that alter cellular energetic stoichiometry of ATP:NADPH (Halsey and Jones 2015). Investments of ATP into cell maintenance are highest at low growth rates (Kliphuis et al. 2012). To generate ATP for maintenance, slow growing nutrient limited cells rely heavily on rapid turnover of newly fixed carbon through glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration. Biosynthetic demand for NADPH is greater in fast-growing nutrient-limited cells and is primarily supplied through catabolism of longer-lived carbon storage forms that accumulate during the S phase of the cell cycle. Thus, the lifetimes of newly fixed carbon increase with nutrient-limited growth rate and during the S phase of the cell cycle (Halsey et al. 2013).

Growth rate-dependent differences in the lifetimes of newly fixed carbon were also shown in response to light-limited growth rate. The 20-min pulse labeling experiment showed the sum of the carbohydrate, protein, and lipid carbon pools matched GPC in cells growing at the faster two growth rates but was only one-third of GPC in cells growing at the slowest growth rate (Fig. 3). This result indicates that all of the carbon fixed during the 20 min incubation was retained in faster growing cells, but about two-thirds of the carbon fixed during the 20 min incubation was respired in slow growing cells (see also pulse labeling and biomass composition discussion below). Thus, the unexpected growth rate-dependent shifts in αb derived from Chla specific 20 min 14C-uptake measurements (Table 3; Fig. 1c) and from \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) in the Post et al.’s study demonstrate interpretation of PE relationships is complicated by growth rate-dependent changes in carbon metabolism during resource limitation.

PE measurements derived from physiological assessments of photosynthesis that are very close to the initial water-splitting reaction (i.e., \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\)) yield αb and αC values that are significantly higher than values derived from measurements that assess photosynthetic energy further downstream because the energy harvested at PSII has not yet been consumed by other metabolic processes; such as respiration and carbon catabolism (Su et al. 2012). Variability in PE parameters also has important consequences when interpreting quantum yield determinations (ϕ m). Shifts in αb and αC caused by growth rate-dependent carbon metabolism (see above) will also strongly affect ϕ m because it is typically calculated by dividing αb by āb. Using αb generated from \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) measurements, cells growing at 0.20 d−1 yielded a ϕ m value of 0.101 mol O2 (mol photons)−1, a value that is relatively close to the maximum theoretical quantum yield of 0.125 mol O2 (mol photons)−1 and similar to the higher values generally found for diatoms (Langdon 1988). Because āb increases with growth rate, ϕ m derived from \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) was only 0.048 in cells growing at 1.54 d−1. PE relationships generated from measurements that account for respiratory energy expenditures cause ϕ m to be lower across all growth rates than relationships generated from measurements of \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}\) (Su et al. 2012). Thus, ϕ m generated from \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}^{\text{b}}\) measurements were 0.084–0.042 mol C (mol photons)−1 and also decreased twofold from the slowest- to fastest-growing cells.

Finally, ϕ m determined from 14C-uptake PE relationships reflect the complicating influence of growth rate-dependent carbon catabolism. Importantly, the shifts in αb driven by growth rate-dependent carbon metabolism offset the changes in āb that cause the characteristic growth rate-dependent changes in ϕ m determined from \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) and \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}^{\text{b}}\). These counteracting shifts in āb and αb result in a significantly narrowed range of ϕ m: 0.045–0.035 mol C (mol photons)−1 in cells growing at the slowest to fastest growth rates, respectively. Thus, interpretations of low ϕ m values must take into account both the method used to assess photosynthetic physiology (i.e., the type of measurement that used to generate the PE curve) and growth rate-dependent metabolism.

Energy use efficiencies

Thalassiosira pseudonana is highly efficient at converting light energy to biomass under light-limiting conditions. Across all growth rates, NPP bC :\({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) was >0.50, compared to values of ~0.33 where nitrogen was the limiting resource in diatoms and green algae (Halsey and Jones 2015; Jakob et al. 2007). A similarly high NPP bC :\({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) value was also measured in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum when grown under light-limited conditions (Wagner et al. 2006). NPP bC :\({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) appears to be lower in phytoplankton from other taxonomic groups. NPP bC :\({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) was ~0.30 in a light-limited green alga and cyanobacterium (Wagner et al. 2006). Very low values (0.17) have been attributed to greater requirements for LDR processes (Kunath et al. 2012). Taken together, these data suggest that diatoms have evolved to be highly efficient at converting harvested light energy to biomass when light is the limiting resource. This high-energy-use efficiency may be a property that reflects diatom’s adaptive life history.

Our results also suggest that energy use efficiencies vary depending on the limiting resource. Carefully controlled laboratory culture studies have revealed patterns of energy use that may be linked to adaptive physiology and growth conditions (Halsey and Jones 2015). For example, high NPP bC :\({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\) values were also observed in a motile prasinophyte, Micromonas sp. RCC299, and were attributed to physiological tradeoffs in energy investment strategies where high pigment content was maintained to achieve high photosynthetic rates even under very low nutrient availability (Halsey et al. 2014). More is needed to understand the combined effects of light and nitrogen limitation (Jakob et al. 2007). Nevertheless, these studies demonstrate a potential framework for predicting physiological responses and primary production under different environmental conditions given knowledge of the phytoplankton community.

Relationships between other measures of productivity are useful for understanding how photosynthetic energy is allocated to different metabolic pathways. For example, the difference between \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}^{\text{b}}\) and NPP bC quantifies energy used for biosynthesis of macromolecules that are more biochemically reduced than the initial product of carbon fixation, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (i.e., lipids, proteins). NPP bC :\({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}^{\text{b}}\) can be used to compare the magnitude of this metabolic sink across growth rates, between organisms, and in response to different environmental conditions. In this study, NPP bC :\({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}^{\text{b}}\) did not change across light-limited growth rates, a result that is consistent with an equivalent overall cellular carbon reduction state (Cr:CO) in cells grown at 0.20 and 0.85 d−1 (Table 5). The much lower Cr:CO in cells grown at 1.54 d−1 was apparently driven by retention of carbohydrates (Fig. 3). These results were surprising because they are counter to our initial hypothesis that the need for more reductant (NADPH) for biosynthesis of energy-rich thylakoid membranes (i.e., lipids) at very low light-limited growth rates would dominate the NPP bC :NP bO/C relationship (Raven 1984). Instead, it appears that carbohydrate and protein content are the primary drivers of NPP bC :NP bO/C . The NPP bC :NP bO/C value of ~0.77 in light-limited T. pseudonana is similar to NPP bC :NP bO/C values in light-limited P. tricornutum (Wagner et al. 2006). Lower ratios were observed in a cyanobacterium and a cryptophyte, respectively (Kunath et al. 2012), reflecting known species differences in the overall reduction state of biomass (Sukenik and Livne 1991).

Macromolecular composition

14C-pulse labeling experiments together with measurements of biomass composition showed that the fate of newly fixed carbon differs depending on light-limited growth rate. In faster growing cells, the bulk of newly fixed carbon is allocated to longer-lived carbohydrates and proteins. Over the course of the cell cycle, carbohydrates are catabolized for two purposes: maintenance respiration and NADPH generation for biosynthesis of lipids and nucleic acids and other energy-rich molecules. We inferred from cellular carbon quotas that lipid content was likely significantly greater in cells grown at 0.85 and 1.54 d−1. However, LMW metabolites could constitute a significant fraction of biomass, causing us to overestimate lipid content. Cell lipid content estimated using an empirical thylakoid lipid mass value [kg per mol pigment from Raven (1984)] and measured Chla content (Table 2), yielded only 0.34 pg lipid in the slowest-growing cells, supporting our conclusion that under very low light availability, cells retain very little energy in the lipid fraction of biomass compared to higher light-acclimated cells. These high-light cells are likely more heavily enriched in membrane phospholipids that are external to the chloroplast (Halsey et al. 2011). By far the largest fraction of photosynthate is ultimately retained in protein in the biomass of slowly growing light-limited cells, a result that was also found for nutrient-limited cultures (Halsey et al. 2011; Morris 1980).

Pathway gating between respiratory and other ATP producing pathways

Our set of photosynthetic measurements yielded rates for mitochondrial respiration in the dark (DR) and light (MMR) as well as short water–water cycles collectively referred to as light-dependent respiration (LDR). The relative contributions of these respiratory processes changed with light-limited growth rate. MMR determined at each growth irradiance in T. pseudonana (Fig. 2b, yellow area, GPC\({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}\)) was ~4- to 14-fold lower than DR measured from oxygen loss rates in the dark during MIMS experiments (i.e., Fig. 1b or e, \({\text{NP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} /{\text{C}}}}\) production at zero light). This finding is consistent with previous studies that observed enhanced postillumination respiration, although the basis for the difference in DR and MMR is not understood (Bate et al. 1988; Geider et al. 1985; Weger et al. 1989). In P. tricornutum, DR was about ten times larger than MMR, but in that study, MMR did not change with growth intensity (Geider et al. 1985).

One explanation for the discrepancy in MMR and DR is that other respiratory processes, such as LDR, are upregulated in the light. The fraction of gross photosynthesis dedicated to LDR increased with the decreasing light-limited growth rates (Fig. 2b; Table 4). Thus LDR contributes to ATP production in the light and can help resolve at least some of the differences between DR and MMR. Furthermore, by switching to LDR pathways for ATP production in the light, cells reduce their reliance on catabolism of carbon stores for their total ATP requirements.

Another pathway that may supplement ATP production in the light is cyclic electron flow around PSI. This pathway has been implicated as an important metabolic process in high-light-acclimated and unstressed diatoms (Fietz and Nicklisch 2002; Thamatrakoln et al. 2013; Wagner et al. 2006). However, because it contributes neither to O2 nor carbon flux, we could not capture the contribution of cyclic PSI transport to the overall photosynthetic energy budget in light-limited T. pseudonana using our collection of measurements.

Our results suggest that pathway gating between LDR and/or cyclic PSI transport and MMR is especially important for cells such as diatoms with life histories that include deep mixing. A primary difference between the former two pathways (LDR and cyclic PSI transport) and MMR is the source of electrons used to drive ATP synthesis. For MMR, carbon oxidation produces NADH that is fed into the respiratory electron transport chain. In contrast, LDR can occur prior to carbon fixation by reduction of O2 to H2O on the stromal side of the thylakoid membrane to enhance the proton motive force for ATP generation (Asada 1999). LDR includes the malate valve that shuttles reductant from the plastid to the mitochondrial respiratory electron transport chain, possibly employing an alternative oxidase (AOX) (Allen et al. 2008). Reductant shuttling to AOX was recently shown to be an important ATP generating process in diatoms (Prihoda et al. 2012; Bailleul et al. 2015).

The sensitivity of LDR, and possibly cyclic PSI transport, to light-limited growth rate suggests that these pathways are highly tuned to light availability, and they supplement ATP production derived from MMR. Cyclic electron transport around PSI bypasses transfer of electrons to NADPH via ferredoxin and, instead, returns electrons to the Q-pool within the photosynthetic electron transport chain, thus promoting the proton motive force to generate ATP. Switching from 100 % DR in the dark to ~50 % MMR plus ~50 % LDR/cyclic PSI transport in the light, when averaged among all light-limited growth rates, is a form of pathway gating that we suggest is important to conserve carbon stores when light availability is scarce.

Diatoms are dominant members of the phytoplankton community during seasonal deep mixing events and in turbulent coastal regions. Our results suggest that pathway gating of electrons and carbon in response to light availability is an important mechanism that underlies high growth efficiencies in diatoms during low light conditions. This study supports the idea that the unique compartmental organization of proteins involved in carbon metabolism in diatoms (Smith et al. 2012; Wilhelm et al. 2006) may be especially important in regulating the flux of carbon and energy depending on light availability.

Conclusions

  1. (1)

    Thalassiosira pseudonana is extremely efficient at converting harvested light energy into biomass. Across all growth rates, more than 57 % of harvested light energy was retained as biomass. The majority of carbon biomass was retained in the protein fraction in the slowest-growing cells, while lipids and carbohydrates were more prevalent in faster growing cells. The carbon composition of fast and slow growing light-limited cells reflects the metabolic demands for different ratios of the energetic currencies, ATP, and NADPH. At low growth rates, requirements for maintenance energy in the form of ATP dominate and are fulfilled through MMR strongly supplemented by alternative pathways for ATP production, including LDR.

  2. (2)

    The well-known influences of photoacclimation on Chla-normalized PE behaviors, namely constant αb and the increasing P bmax with the increasing growth rate, are not observed in PE curves generated from short-term Chla-specific 14C-uptake measurements. The influences of growth rate-dependent carbon metabolism cause αb to increase with growth rate, and cause ϕ m to be significantly constrained compared to ϕ m derived from \({\text{GPP}}_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}^{\text{b}}\). Energetic expenditures (e.g., LDR, mitochondrial respiration) cause ϕ m to decrease as energy assessments are made further downstream of PSII.

  3. (3)

    Diatoms shift between ATP generating pathways to achieve high growth efficiencies at low light. At low light intensities, LDR contributes a greater proportion of ATP production than MMR. The enhanced role of LDR (and possibly cyclic PSI transport) at low light-limited growth rates may function to conserve carbon stores, which would be depleted by MMR. Pathway gating between different respiratory pathways and other alternative pathways for ATP generation appears to balance the cells’ needs for ATP and carbon storage.

In this study, we have discovered that diatoms achieve a high efficiency of light energy conversion to biomass at low light levels by redistributing energy to more efficient ATP generating pathways. The evidence presented here reveals in more detail how diatoms succeed by controlling their metabolism. The challenge ahead is to determine whether other microalgae use similar mechanisms or have different adaptive properties of photosynthetic metabolism. Moreover, because of the role played by ‘omics in modern plankton ecology, it will be important to understand the specific molecular mechanisms that implement this adaptive control and to compare across genomes to understand their origin and distribution across diverse phytoplankton taxa.