Abstract
Down syndrome (DS) induces a variable phenotype including intellectual disabilities and early development of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Moreover, individuals with DS display accelerated aging that affects diverse organs, among them the brain. The Ts65Dn mouse is the most widely used model to study DS. Progressive loss of cholinergic neurons is one of the hallmarks of AD present in DS and in the Ts65Dn model. In this study, we quantify the number of cholinergic neurons in control and Ts65Dn mice, observing a general reduction in their number with age but in particular, a greater loss in old Ts65Dn mice. Increased expression of the m1 muscarinic receptor in the hippocampus counteracts this loss. Cholinergic neurons in the Ts65Dn mice display overexpression of the early expression gene c-fos and an increase in the expression of β-galactosidase, a marker of senescence. A possible mechanism for senescence induction could be phosphorylation of the transcription factor FOXO1 and its retention in the cytoplasm, which we are able to confirm in the Ts65Dn model. In our study, using Ts65Dn mice, we observe increased cholinergic activity, which induces a process of early senescence that culminates in the loss of these neurons.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Down syndrome (DS) is the most common chromosomal alteration with an incidence of one in 1000 live births [1]. Trisomy of human chromosome 21 induces a phenotype that includes immune deficiencies, heart defects, intellectual disability, altered motor development, reduced muscle tone and early development of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [2,3,4,5,6]. Moreover, and possibly related to AD, individuals with DS display accelerated aging that affects diverse organs, among them the brain [7].
Several animal models that mimic the alterations in DS are available, among them the most widely used is the Ts65Dn mouse [8]. This model is segmentally trisomic for a portion of the mouse chromosome 16, an orthologous to the long arm of the human chromosome 21, which codes for approximately 140 genes, many of which are highly conserved between mice and humans [7, 9, 10]. The phenotype of the Ts65Dn mouse includes alterations in working memory, deficits in long-term memory, motor dysfunctions, reduced pain responsiveness and hyperactivity [7, 11, 12]. Other remarkable features on the cellular level are cholinergic neuron loss related to age, reduced neuronal number in hippocampal regions and imbalance between excitation and inhibition [13,14,15,16,17]. In particular, the progressive loss of cholinergic neurons, which is observed in some studies at 6 months of age in trisomic mice, is linked to cognitive and physiological impairments, one of the neuropathological hallmarks of AD [7, 18, 19].
Post-mortem analysis of samples from AD patients has revealed a significant reduction in the population of cholinergic neurons, giving thus rise to the cholinergic hypothesis for the cognitive decline observed in AD [20]. Now it is postulated that the cholinergic signalling system plays a critical role in the central nervous system by modulating cognitive function, learning and memory in addition to circadian rhythms [21]. Studies in post-mortem samples from old DS individuals have showed the presence of similar alteration between AD and DS [22, 23].
The above mentioned decline in cholinergic neuron number can be also found in the Ts65Dn mouse model and is thought to be related to a decline in processing of pro Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) into mature NGF in aged trisomic mice [7, 24, 25]. Moreover, an increased level of amyloid precursor protein (APP) is attributed to a disruption of NGF transport in cholinergic neurons [26]. All these events generate a profound deficit in the level of this important neuronal growth factor leading to cholinergic neuron apoptosis [25, 27].
A premature mortality rate in individuals with DS as compared to the general population is the result of premature aging [28, 29]. Early aging also affects the brain and is enhanced by the early development of AD due to an excess of amyloid peptide resulting from the presence of an extra copy of the APP gene in DS [29]. The brains of patients with AD present characteristic neurofibrillary tangles and amyloid plaques, however in DS patients, amyloid deposits are already present during adolescence and are increased progressively with age. Amyloid deposits in the brain induce oxidative stress and neuroinflammation leading to synaptic dysfunction and neuronal death, thus accelerating disease progression [30]. Oxidative stress as a possible cause of neurodegeneration has been widely analysed in DS. Noteworthy, more than 10 genes in the human chromosome 21 codify for proteins related to oxidative stress. Recent studies of our group show an increase of molecules related to oxidative stress such as COX-2 in the temporal cortex of Ts65Dn mice and humans with DS [31]. Dysregulation of other molecules such as reelin that is present in AD, is observed early in life in DS individuals and the Ts65Dn mice model [32].
Although the loss of cholinergic neurons with age is clearly documented in neuropathological diseases, controversy exists about the timely onset of the loss [33]. In this study, we analyse the temporal process of cholinergic neuron loss, the changes in cellular function and their terminal targets. Investigating the possible mechanism of neuronal cell death, we demonstrate the pivotal role of the pAKT/pFOXO1 pathway as a main modulator of these effects.
Experimental Procedures
Experimental mice were generated by repeated backcrossing of Ts65Dn females to C57/6Ei x C3H/HeSnJ (B6EiC3) F1 hybrid males. The parental generation was obtained from the research colony of Jackson Laboratory. Euploid littermates of Ts65Dn mice served as controls. For this study, we used 36 male mice (18 trisomic mice and 18 euploid mice) of three different ages, 1, 6 and 14 month-old (6 each). The genotypic characterization was established by qRT-PCR using SYBR Green PCR master mix (applied biosystems) from genomic DNA extracted of mice tails by means of the phenol–chloroform method. The relative amount of each gene was quantified by the ABI PRISM 7700 (Applied Biosystems). The genes analysed where APP (3 copies) and Apo-B (2 copies) as previously described [34, 35]. The primers used were the following: for APP (APP-F 5ʹ-TGT TCG GCT GTG TGA TCC TGT GAC-3ʹ; APP-R 5ʹ-AGA AAC GAG CGG CGA AGG GC-3ʹ) and for Apo-B (Apo-B-F 5ʹ-TGC CAG GCT TGT GCT GCT GT-3ʹ; Apo-B-R 5ʹ-GGG TGC TGC CTT TCT CTT GGG G-3ʹ). All animal experimentation was conducted in accordance with the Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes and was approved by the Committee on Bioethics of the Universitat de València. Every effort was made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering. Animals were housed under a normal 12 h light/12 h dark cycle. Water and food were available ad libitum.
The animals were kept in isolated boxes the last 24 h before the moment of sacrifice (kept in a 12 h light/dark schedule) in order to prevent c-fos expression alterations. Then, under pentobarbital overanesthesia (intraperitoneally, 120 mg/kg), the animals were transcardially perfused using a saline solution followed by a solution containing 4% paraformaldehyde in PB (0.1 M, pH 7.4). Brains were removed and cryoprotected using 30% sucrose. Fifty microns Sects. (6 subseries for each brain) were obtained using a sliding freezing microtome.
Immunohistochemical Procedure (DAB)
Tissue was processed “free-floating” for immunohistochemistry as follows. Briefly, sections were incubated with 10% methanol, 3% H2O2 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 10 min to block endogenous peroxidase activity.
After this, sections were treated for 1 h with 5% normal donkey serum (NDS) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA) in PBS with 0.2% Triton-X100 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and were incubated overnight at room temperature in polyclonal rabbit anti-p75NTR antibody (1:1000, Alomone Labs). After washing, sections were incubated for 2 h with donkey anti-rabbit IgG biotinylated antibody (1:250; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA), followed by avidin–biotin–peroxidase complex (ABC; Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK) diluted in PBS, for 30 min. Colour development was achieved by incubating with 0.05% 3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.033% hydrogen peroxide in PB for 4 min. Finally, sections were mounted on slides, dried for one day at room temperature, dehydrated with ascending alcohols and rinsed in xylene. After this, sections were coverslipped using Eukitt mounting medium (PANREAC). All studied sections passed through all procedures simultaneously in order to minimize any difference from the immunohistochemical staining itself. To avoid any bias in the analysis, all slides were coded prior to analysis and remained so until the experiment was completed.
The antibodies which had been previously tested in their laboratory of origin, showed a regional and cellular immunolabelling similar to previous descriptions for these antigens. In order to exclude that some of the immunostaining was produced by the secondary antibodies or by the immunohistochemical protocol, primary antibodies were omitted or substituted by normal donkey serum. These controls resulted in a complete absence of immunostaining in every case.
p75NTR and vAchT Positive Cells Quantification
The number of cells expressing the proteins p75NTR or vAchT (vesicular achetilcoline transporter) in the medial septum were quantified in 1, 6 and 14-month-old control and Ts65Dn mice using a modified version of the fractionator method [36], as previously described [37]. In brief, cells were counted covering 100% of the sample area, that is, within each section, all labelled cells were counted. The fractionator-sampling scheme refers to the methodology of examining one out of every six brain sections. Thus, our modification of the optical dissector combined with a 1:6 fractionator sampling is truly a modification of the optical fractionator method. 1:6 systematic-random series of sections covering the entire rostral to caudal extension of this structure were observed in an Olympus C×41 microscope under bright-field illumination, at 400× magnification under homogeneous illumination and photographs were taken with a CCD camera. The volume of the septal region analysed was determined for each animal using the Cavalieri’s principle [38]. To avoid any bias in the analysis, all slides were coded prior to analysis and remained so until the experiment was completed. After quantification, data were analysed with GraphPad Prism 9. In order to determine differences between groups, multiple unpaired t-test (parametric data, p75NTR) or Mann–Whitney U test (non parametric, vAchT) were used to assess the statistical significance (criterion at p < 0.05).
Size of Cholinergic Neurons in the Medial Septum
We performed the size quantification of cholinergic neurons as described in previous studies [39]. In brief, the sections stained for p75NTR were used and the area of the cell bodies of at least 100 cells per animal (8 animals per group) were quantified using ImageJ software. The mean value for each group was compared using GraphPad Prism 9 software. In order to determine differences between groups (phenotype or ages), Multiple unpaired t-test were used to assess the statistical significance (criterion at p < 0.05).
Single and Double Immunofluorescence
We performed single immunofluorescence against muscarinic receptor 1 for acetylcholine (mAchR1) to evaluate its hippocampal expression and double labelling (vAchT/c-fos) and (vAchT/FOXO1p) to evaluate respectively transcriptional activity and retention of the transcription factor FOXO1 in cholinergic neurons in the medial septum. Briefly, the general procedure for immunohistochemistry was followed but the peroxidase blocking step omitted. After washing, sections were incubated with citrate buffer (0.01 M, pH 6.0, 100 °C, 1 min) to recover antigenicity. Then, sections were treated for 1 h with 5% normal donkey serum (NDS) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA) in PBS with 0.2% Triton-X100 (Sigma-Aldrich) and were incubated overnight at room temperature with polyclonal rabbit anti- mAchR1 (1:1000, Alomone, AMR-01) or with polyclonal goat anti-vAchT (1:5000, Millipore) with polyclonal rabbit anti c-Fos (1:1000, Santa Cruz biotechnology) or polyclonal rabbit anti FOXO1p (1:500, Cell Signaling). After washing, sections were incubated for 2 h with donkey anti-goat IgG conjugated with Alexa 488 (1:100, Invitrogen) and donkey anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with Alexa 555 (1:100, Invitrogen). After washing sections were mounted on microscope slides using a medium for fluorescent sections (Dako Citomation) and quantified using a confocal microscope Leica DM 2500.
c-fos Expression in the Medial Septum Cholinergic Neurons
All the vAchT positive neurons in the medial septum of each animal were checked for c-fos expression. Sections were examined with a Leica DM25000 confocal microscope, homogeneously lighted and digitalized. Photographs were taken at 400× magnification and parallel subseries of Nissl stained sections were used as guidance to help to locate the region of interest. Confocal z-stacks covering the whole depth of the sections were taken with 1 μm step size and only subsets of confocal planes with the optimal penetration level for vAchT and c-fos antibodies were selected. Images were analysed using ImageJ software (NIH). A 5% intensity threshold (marked cells express c-fos at 95–100% relative intensity) was assessed and positive cells quantified. Collected data were analysed using GraphPad Prism 9 software. In order to evaluate differences between groups (phenotype or ages), Mann–Whitney U test was used to determine the statistical significance (criterion at p < 0.05).
Senescence of Cholinergic Neurons
Double labelling of b-galactosidase activity in cholinergic neurons was performed. For senescence staining supplier specifications were followed. Briefly, sections were incubated at 37 °C with a solution containing (X-Gal stock solution 25 µL, 0,4 M potassium ferrycianide 12.5 µL, 0,4 M potassium ferrocianide 12.5 µL per ml of ultrapure water) during 4 h followed by PBS washes. Then samples were incubated with 10% NDS in PBS-Triton X-100 0.2% for 1 h and finally overnight with a solution containing polyclonal goat anti-vAchT (1:5000, Millipore). After washing, sections were incubated for 2 h with donkey anti-goat IgG conjugated with Alexa 555 (1:100, Invitrogen), washed again and mounted on microscope slides using a medium for fluorescent sections (Dako Citomation). Sections were examined for immunofluorescence for vAchT using a high sensitive Olympus DP71 camera attached to a fluorescence microscope Olympus BX41. Collected data was analysed using GraphPad Prism 9 software. In order to evaluate differences between groups (phenotype or ages), Mann–Whitney U test was used to determine the statistical significance (criterion at p < 0.05).
Densitometrical Analysis of vAchT, mAchR1 and FOXO1p
For mAchR1 expression, a previously described methodology was used [40, 41]. Sections of hippocampus were examined with a Leica DM25000 confocal microscope, homogeneously lighted and digitalized. Photographs were taken at 400× magnification and parallel subseries of Nissl stained sections were used as guidance to help to locate the regions of interest. Confocal z-stacks covering the whole depth of the sections were taken with 1 μm step size and only subsets of confocal planes with the optimal penetration level for each antibody were selected. In order to avoid blood vessels and somata, small regions of the neuropil (505 μm2) were manually selected for analysis in these planes. Images were processed using ImageJ software as follows: the background was subtracted with a rolling value of 50, converted to 8-bit deep images and binarized using a determined threshold value. Then, the images were processed with a blur filter to reduce noise.
For the cellular expression of vAchT and FOXO1p in cholinergic neurons and vAchT expression in the neuropil of the hippocampus both control and trisomic mice of different ages were studied. For analysis of the intensity of the expression a previously described methodology was used [42]. Sections were examined with a Leica DM25000 confocal microscope under homogeneous illumination and digitalized. Photographs were taken at 400× magnification and images converted to grey level images that were measured using Image J software (NIH). For cellular quantification, fifty cells from each sample were analysed. Means were determined for each experimental group (Ts65Dn vs. euploid littermates and age (young, adult and old). Data has been analysed using GraphPad Prism 9 software. In order to evaluate differences between groups (phenotype or ages), Mann–Whitney U test was used to detrimne the statistical significance (criterion at p < 0.05) (for non parametric data) or Multiple unpaired t-test (criterion at p < 0.05) (for parametric data).
Results
In order to define the temporal profile of loss of cholinergic neurons in the medial septum, we examined the number of cholinergic neurons in control and trisomic mice of different ages using the receptor p75NTR and vAchT as markers (Fig. 1). As previously reported [43], and shown in Fig. 1A–G, p75NTR marker defines perfectly the morphology of cholinergic neurons. Analysis of the expression of p75NTR showed a statistically significant reduction in the number of cholinergic neurons between young-adult trisomic mice and old (14-month-old) trisomic mice (9222 ± 537 vs 7909 ± 100 cholinergic neurons, p = 0.0051). Control animals did not present this reduction between adult and old mice (Fig. 1K). Moreover, analysing every group, there was no difference between phenotypes except in old mice where fewer cholinergic neurons were found in trisomic mice as compared to their euploid littermates. Cholinergic neurons express the vAchT protein as well as p75NTR. We observed that some cholinergic neurons presented a low expression of vAchT compared to p75NTR, thus resulting in a lower number of vAchT positive cells (Fig. 1H–J). The analysis of the number of cells expressing vAchT neurons in the medial septum resulted in a similar pattern of expression with only a statistically significant difference between old control and trisomic mice (6462 ± 214 vs. 5549 ± 73 p = 0.00016).
In the following step, the activity status of those cells was analysed by performing double labelling for the vesicular transporter for acetylcholine, vAchT (expressed by cholinergic neurons) and the early expression gene c-fos (Fig. 2). We quantified the percentage of cholinergic neurons expressing c-fos (over a set threshold). Expression of the vAchT delimitated clearly the cholinergic neurons (Fig. 2A–F), similar to what we had observed previously with p75NTR. Quantification of cholinergic neurons positive for c-fos at different ages in control and trisomic mice revealed that the percentage of active cells remained stable in each phenotype (Fig. 2D). However, the percentage of active cholinergic neurons was higher in trisomic mice as compared to control littermates in every age analysed (around 10 vs. 15%) (Fig. 2G).
After observing the elevated activity of cholinergic neurons in trisomic mice, and in order to determine the acetylcholine content in these cells, we analysed the intensity of vAchT expression in single cholinergic neurons (Fig. 3). We detected an excess of vAchT expression in cholinergic neurons of trisomic mice as compared to controls (Fig. 3A–E). As a general feature, we found a slight reduction of expression of vAchT with age in both, control and trisomic mice. However, the expression of vAchT was higher in trisomic mice in all age groups analysed (Fig. 3F) without changes among ages. Changes in the expression of this marker could possibly be related to alterations in the size of cholinergic neurons. Analysing the size of cholinergic neurons in the medial septum of both phenotypes and different ages we observed almost no change in size between groups and ages (Fig. 3G); therefore changes in the expression must be related to changes in its metabolism rather than in its size. Next, we studied the main projection region of medial septum cholinergic neurons (the hippocampus) focussing on the expression of vAchT and mAchR1 (Fig. 4). For vAchT, we analysed the expression of this marker in the neuropil of adult control and trisomic mice. In general, we observed no changes in the expression of adult mice. Only strata moleculare, hilus and lacunosum displayed a reduction in the expression of this marker (Fig. 3H). As for m1AchR1, we observed a similar pattern of change in the entire hippocampus; here we show the results in the CA1 area as an example. Expression of mAchR1 was especially prominent in the cell bodies of principal neurons and in the principal dendrites (Fig. 4A–H). Comparison of the expression intensity of this receptor between phenotypes and ages showed that control animals maintained the same expression level over age in all the regions analysed. However, young and adult trisomic mice (where cholinergic neurons were present and over-activated) displayed less mAchR1 expression as compared to old trisomic animals (where cholinergic neuron number diminished). Surprisingly, we observed a similar level of mAchR1 expression in old control and old trisomic mice (Fig. 4I–K).
Since we observed a progressive loss of cholinergic neurons but an excess of cellular activity (observed by c-fos expression and vAchT expression) coupled to parallel changes in the expression of mAchR1 in the hippocampus, we decided to study the possible mechanism underlying cholinergic neuron degeneration in trisomic mice. Since we failed to find apoptotic cholinergic neurons (data not shown) and previous studies pointed to the possibility of an increase in senescent cells in trisomic mice [44], we decided to investigate the senescent state of these neurons. Samples from control and trisomic mice of different ages were double-labelled with β-galactosidase and vAchT. In adult and old mice β-galactosidase staining was present in cholinergic neurons, whereas none was detected in young mice (Fig. 5A–H). Statistical analysis of the percentage of cholinergic neurons displaying β-galactosidase staining (senescent cholinergic neurons) (Fig. 5I) revealed a significant difference dependent of phenotype (p < 0.05) and age (p < 0.001). Separate analysis by groups demonstrated clearly the presence of more senescent cholinergic neurons of both, adult and old trisomic mice (in percentage adult: 0.25 ± 0.25 vs. 6.50 ± 1.24 p = 0.0014; old: 22.18 ± 1.67 vs. 32.37 ± 2.28 p = 0.0011).
Previous studies have shown over-activation of the Akt pathway in trisomic mice [45]. Since the phosphorylated form of the FOXO1 transcription factor forms part of this pathway and has been related to senescence induction (or apoptosis blocking), we examined the expression of FOXO1p retained in the cytoplasm of cholinergic neurons (Fig. 6A–R). In general, a progressive increase of cytoplasmic FOXO1p in cholinergic neurons with age was observed, whereas no difference between young control and Ts65Dn mice could be found. However, adult and old trisomic mice displayed a higher expression of FOXO1p in the cytoplasm of cholinergic neurons as compared to their euploid littermates (in grey levels adult: 42.3 ± 1.9 vs. 51.8 ± 2.6 p = 0.0034; old: 62.6 ± 3.7 vs. 83.1 ± 2.1 p = 0.0011) (Fig. 6S).
Discussion
In this study, we have quantified the number of cholinergic neurons in the medial septum of control and Ts65Dn mice of different ages (1, 6 and 14-months-old) using two different markers (p75NTR and vAchT) and obtaining similar results. We observe a general reduction in the number of medial septum cholinergic neurons with age but in particular, a greater loss in old Ts65Dn mice. Using the early expressing gene c-fos as an indicator for functional cholinergic neurons, we find that Ts65Dn cholinergic neurons display an excess of activation and an overexpression of vAchT without changes in size. The main target of the cholinergic neurons in the medial septum is the hippocampus. We observe a slight reduction of vAchT expression in some regions of the hippocampus of old trisomic mice. Analysis of mAchR1 expression in the hippocampus shows that the expression of the receptor does not change with age in control mice, however in old trisomic mice we observe an increase of its expression accompanied by an increase in the degenerative process. Due to the lack of cholinergic neurons displaying apoptotic markers, we have analysed the senescent state by using β-galactosidase expression, a reliable marker of senescence. We observe a clear increase of senescent cholinergic neurons in the medial septum of trisomic mice. A possible mechanism for senescence induction and apoptosis inhibition could be the phosphorylation of the transcription factor FOXO1, a member of the signalling Akt signalling cascade. In fact, we observe an excess of FOXO1p in the cytoplasm of cholinergic neurons of old trisomic mice. Most likely, the functional excess found in cholinergic neurons generates a process of early senescence that culminates in the loss of these neurons.
The use of p75NTR as a marker of cholinergic neurons is widely accepted [46]. Previous studies have analysed the cholinergic profile in human samples from DS patients as well as in the Ts65Dn murine model for DS. As a general observation, these studies have shown a normal expression pattern of the p75NTR in samples from young humans or mice and a reduction in samples from old individuals [13, 18, 47, 48]. Here we find less p75NTR expressing neurons in old mice as compared to young and adult ones, thus suggesting a neurodegenerative process especially in 14-months-old trisomic mice. Our data correlate with previous studies that have reported a reduction of cholinergic neurons between 6 and 10 months [13, 47]. Nevertheless, other studies show that the reduction is only significant at 20 months [12], at 12 months [18] or at 18–19 months of age [43]. In order to ensure that the reduction in the number of medial septum cholinergic neuron is not due to a reduction of the receptor for neurotrophin, we have studied the number of cholinergic neurons using vAchT as an alternative marker, and found similar results.
Colocalization studies between vAchT and c-fos allowed us to determine the activation state of cholinergic neurons in the medial septum in control and Ts65Dn mice, showing statistically significant differences for genotypes of all ages. Previous studies that reported an over-activation of neurons in individuals with DS [49] as well as in Ts65Dn mice [50] support these results. Moreover, studies of our group (Carbonell et al., in prep.) show an over-expression of c-fos by neurons located in the piriform cortex. Interestingly, this over-activation does not take place in all cells in individuals with DS; in fact, studies in DS lymphocytes have shown a reduction of c-fos [51]. One possible explanation could be that the over-function of cholinergic neurons in old trisomic mice is a consequence of a decrease in their number. However, this phenomenon starts before the onset of neurodegeneration, giving way to an alternative explanation, in which the over-activation could be responsible for the premature neuronal death observed in trisomic mice.
In order to analyse whether the over-activation correlates with the normal functioning of cholinergic neurons we have quantified the expression of vAchT in control and trisomic mice of different ages. We find a progressive decrease in the expression of vAchT with age in both groups. Interestingly, in trisomic mice we observe an over-expression of vAchT in all ages. Overexpression of vAchT has been correlated to increase acetylcholine concentration and related to accelerated aging processes [52]. This alteration supports previous studies that have shown an increase in choline acetyl transferase (ChAT) activity in 6-months-old [18]; 10-months-old [43] and 12-months-old [53] Ts65Dn mice. Moreover, patients in early stage of AD development display an increase in cholinergic activity, suggesting a compensatory response [54]. All these data suggest that cholinergic neurons are over-activated and over-functioning beginning early in life. Moreover, this over-activation could be the basis of the posterior neurodegeneration. Changes in the size of cholinergic neurons could be responsible, at least in part of the different somatic expression of vAchT. For this reason, we have analysed the size of medial septum cholinergic neurons and we did not observe changes with age or phenotype. This results support the idea of an alteration in the expression of the transporter rather than structural changes.
These results seem to contradict the classic cholinergic hypothesis [20] that relates the hypofunction of the cholinergic system to the impairment in the cognitive profile. In our Ts65Dn mouse model learning and memory impairment starts at 6-months of age [13, 47], whereas in other models the cholinergic degeneration starts later, at around 14 months or 20 months [24].
Recently, Dasari and Gulledge (2011) [55] showed that mAchR1 together with receptor m4 are responsible for the cholinergic modulation of excitatory circuits in the hippocampus, the main target of medial septum cholinergic neurons. More concretely, mAchR1 is involved in memory consolidation [56]. Analysing the expression of mAchR1 in the hippocampus we observe a reduction in the expression of this receptor in the young and adult trisomic hippocampal region CA1 and surprisingly an increase in its expression with age, noticeably between adult and old animals. Previous studies in individuals with DS have shown similar results [57] where the authors observed a progressive increase in the expression of the receptor with age in human trisomic samples. A possible explanation for this finding could be that the brain counteracts the decrease in acetylcholine by increasing the expression of the receptor and thus becoming more sensitive to the neurotransmitter. However, the early deficit we observe in the expression of the mAchR1 in young and adult trisomic mice must have a genetic origin or, perhaps, could be related to the hyperfunction of cholinergic neurons seen at those ages (Figs. 2, 3) and consequently to the possible excess of neurotransmitter in the media. Following this idea we have analysed the expression of vAchT in the different subregions of old trisomic mice (Fig. 3H). The CA1 region displays similar expression of vAchT between control and Ts65Dn mice correlating with similar expression of mAchR1 observed in these regions in old mice (Fig. 4I–K).
The degeneration of cholinergic neurons is a possible consequence of the reduced availability of NGF necessary for their survival [27]. Studies in human samples and Ts65Dn mice have revealed alteration in the processing of NGF giving rise to a low concentration of this factor [25]. Low concentration of NGF affects cholinergic neuron survival by inducing cellular apoptosis [58] mediated by cleaved caspase 3 [59]. Therefore, we set out to quantify the number of cholinergic neurons expressing the apoptotic marker caspase 3. We failed to observe cholinergic neurons undergoing apoptosis in any age group or phenotype. Since apoptosis is a short process, it is possible that we missed it in our samples. However, we neither observed apoptotic nor residual bodies in the region. The apoptotic extension in the brain of individuals with DS and murine models for this alteration is controversial. Some studies demonstrated an excess of apoptotic neurons in the brain of DS individuals as well as in some murine models [60]. However, other groups, among them ours, demonstrated no alteration or even reduction in the amount of apoptotic neurons in the brain of individuals with DS and the murine model Ts65Dn [61,62,63]. An interesting alternative could be that neurons instead enter a senescent state by blocking the apoptotic process [64] and consequently die through a non-apoptotic pathway.
Cellular senescence has emerged as a hallmark of AD (for a review see [65]). Recent studies have reconsidered its role in neurodegenerative diseases assuming a potential primary role in these pathologies where cellular senescence has been related to pro-inflammatory molecules [66]. In normal conditions, these senescent cells release pro-inflammatory molecules, as well as other signalling molecules thus stimulating the immune system to clear these senescent cells [67, 68]. However, when the immune system is not able to eliminate them [69], a large accumulation of senescent cells will trigger a chronic inflammatory state that gives rise to cellular damage. The factors that can induce cellular senescence are numerous such as DNA damage, reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial dysfunction, lysosomal alteration, amyloid deposition. Most of these factors are present in DS. Microglia and astrocytes are the effectors of the inflammatory response. Recent studies have shown alterations in microglia even in early stages [70] that could possibly induce an early senescence in neurons in DS and among them in cholinergic neurons. To test this hypothesis we have performed double labelling using vAchT antibodies and β-galactosidase staining (a reliable marker of senescence). We observe a normal increase in the cholinergic senescent cell number with age, but an acceleration of the senescence process in trisomic mice. This result is in accordance with previous studies in other brain regions of this model, such as the hippocampus [44] or the temporal cortex (Mateu et al., in prep). This senescence process could be mediated by the excess of ROS observed in individuals with DS and AD [71]. Oxidative stress is observed in individuals with DS starting early in development affecting neurogenesis, neuronal differentiation as well as survival of cholinergic neurons [44]. Mechanistically, previous studies have shown alterations in some signalling pathways that could explain our observations. Studies in the hippocampus of trisomic mice have demonstrated an increase in the amount of phosphorylated calcium calmodulin kinase II (pCAMKII) as well as the phosphorylated form of protein Kinase B also known as Akt (pAkt) [45]. In fact, it is known that Akt is recruited to the cell membrane where it is double phosphorylated and in turn phosphorylates the Forkhead family transcription factors (FOXO), among them FOXO1. Phosphorylation of FOXO1 inactivates its function as a pro-apoptotic transcription factor [72]. In our study, we observe an overexpression of the phosphorylated form of the FOXO1 that, together with the previously reported over-activation of Akt, could lead to an inhibition in FOXO1 function and subsequent inhibition of the apoptotic pathway. Our results are in accordance with this possibility as we observe a process of senescence rather than an apoptotic pathway in cholinergic neurons in the septum of trisomic mice.
Our results advocate a different picture of neurodegeneration of cholinergic neurons in the aged Ts65Dn mice. We suggest that an excess of cholinergic neuronal function induces a senescent pathway leading to a reduction in their number. Changes in the hippocampus, the main target of septal cholinergic neurons, accompany this process. The increased expression of specific receptors for acetylcholine, such is mAchR1; counteract the reduction of cholinergic innervation in the hippocampus. Even in aged mice, we fail to observe apoptotic cholinergic neurons. A possible explanation is that increased phosphorylation of Akt induces phosphorylation of the transcription factor FOXO1. We demonstrate that aged Ts65Dn mice have a greater number of cholinergic neurons with cytoplasmic-sequestered phosphorylated/inactivated FOXO1 transcription factor known to participate in its non-phosphorylated form in stress-related apoptosis. This observation could explain the lower apoptosis rate for cholinergic neurons, as well as other neurons in the brain of the Ts65Dn mice [61,62,63].
References
Shin M, Besser LM, Kucik JE et al (2009) Prevalence of Down syndrome among children and adolescents in 10 regions of the United States. Pediatrics 124:1565–1571. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0745
Ball MJ, Nuttall K (1980) Neurofibrillary tangles, granulovacuolar degeneration, and neuron loss in down syndrome: quantitative comparison with Alzheimer dementia. Ann Neurol 7:462–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410070512
Folin M, Baiguera S, Conconi MT et al (2003) The impact of risk factors of Alzheimer’s disease in the down syndrome. Int J Mol Med 11:267–270
Hof PR, Bouras C, Perl DP et al (1995) Age-related distribution of neuropathologic changes in the cerebral cortex of patients with Down’s syndrome quantitative regional analysis and comparison with Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Neurol 52:379–391
Holland AJ, Hon J, Huppert FA, Stevens F (2000) Incidence and course of dementia in people with down’s syndrome: findings from a population-based study. J Intellect Disabil Res 44(Pt 2):138–146
Nadel L (2003) Down’s syndrome: a genetic disorder in biobehavioral perspective. Genes Brain Behav 2:156–166
Rueda N, Flórez J, Martínez-Cué C (2012) Mouse models of down syndrome as a tool to unravel the causes of mental disabilities. Neural Plast. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/584071
Davisson MT, Schmidt C, Akeson EC (1990) Segmental trisomy of murine chromosome 16: a new model system for studying Down syndrome. Prog Clin Biol Res 360:263–280
Gardiner K, Fortna A, Bechtel L, Davisson MT (2003) Mouse models of down syndrome: how useful can they be? comparison of the gene content of human chromosome 21 with orthologous mouse genomic regions. Gene 318:137–147
Sturgeon X, Gardiner KJ (2011) Transcript catalogs of human chromosome 21 and orthologous chimpanzee and mouse regions. Mamm Genome 22:261–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-011-9321-y
Gardiner K, Davisson M (2000) The sequence of human chromosome 21 and implications for research into down syndrome. Genome Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2000-1-2-reviews0002
Holtzman DM, Santucci D, Kilbridge J et al (1996) Developmental abnormalities and age-related neurodegeneration in a mouse model of down syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:13333–13338
Granholm AC, Sanders LA, Crnic LS (2000) Loss of cholinergic phenotype in basal forebrain coincides with cognitive decline in a mouse model of down’s syndrome. Exp Neurol 161:647–663. https://doi.org/10.1006/exnr.1999.7289
Insausti AM, Megías M, Crespo D et al (1998) Hippocampal volume and neuronal number in Ts65Dn mice: a murine model of down syndrome. Neurosci Lett 253:175–178
Ayberk Kurt M, Ceri Davies D, Kidd M et al (2000) Synaptic deficit in the temporal cortex of partial trisomy 16 (Ts65Dn) mice. Brain Res 858:191–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(00)01984-3
Belichenko PV, Masliah E, Kleschevnikov AM et al (2004) Synaptic structural abnormalities in the Ts65Dn mouse model of down Syndrome. J Comp Neurol 480:281–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.20337
Pérez-Cremades D, Hernández S, Blasco-Ibáñez JM et al (2010) Alteration of inhibitory circuits in the somatosensory cortex of Ts65Dn mice, a model for down’s syndrome. J Neural Transm 117:445–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-010-0376-9
Cooper JD, Salehi A, Delcroix JD et al (2001) Failed retrograde transport of NGF in a mouse model of Down’s syndrome: reversal of cholinergic neurodegenerative phenotypes following NGF infusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10439–10444. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.181219298
Hamlett ED, Boger HA, Ledreux A et al (2016) Cognitive impairment, neuroimaging, and Alzheimer neuropathology in mouse models of down syndrome HHS public access. Curr Alzheimer Res 13:35–52
Bartus RT, Dean RL, Beer B, Lippa AS (1982) The cholinergic hypothesis of geriatric memory dysfunction. Science 217:408–414. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7046051
Schliebs R, Arendt T (2006) The significance of the cholinergic system in the brain during aging and in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neural Transm 113:1625–1644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-006-0579-2
Godridge H, Reynolds GP, Czudek C et al (1987) Alzheimer-like neurotransmitter deficits in adult down’s syndrome brain tissue. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50:775–778. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.50.6.775
Schneider C, Risser D, Kirchner L et al (1997) Similar deficits of central histaminergic system in patients with down syndrome and Alzheimer disease. Neurosci Lett 222:183–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(97)13379-1
Contestabile A, Ciani E, Contestabile A (2008) The place of choline acetyltransferase activity measurement in the “cholinergic hypothesis” of neurodegenerative diseases. Neurochem Res 33:318–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-007-9497-4
Iulita MF, Do Carmo S, Ower AK et al (2014) Nerve growth factor metabolic dysfunction in down’s syndrome brains. Brain 137:860–872. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt372
Salehi A, Delcroix JD, Belichenko PV et al (2006) Increased app expression in a mouse model of down’s syndrome disrupts NGF transport and causes cholinergic neuron degeneration. Neuron 51:29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.022
Sofroniew MV, Howe CL, Mobley WC (2001) Nerve growth factor signaling, neuroprotection, and neural repair. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:1217–1281. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1217
Esbensen AJ (2010) Health conditions associated with aging and end of life of adults with down syndrome. Int Rev Res Ment Retard 39:107–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7750(10)39004-5
Head E, Silverman W, Patterson D, Lott IT (2012) Aging and down syndrome. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/412536
Lott IT, Head E (2001) Down syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease: A link between development and aging. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.1025
Mulet M, Blasco-Ibáñez JM, Crespo C et al (2017) Early increased density of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) immunoreactive neurons in down syndrome. Folia Neuropathol. https://doi.org/10.5114/fn.2017.68582
Bellés M, Carbonell J, Blasco-Ibáñez JM et al (2019) Alterations in reelin and reelin receptors in down syndrome. NeuroReport 30:14–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000001153
Powers BE, Velazquez R, Kelley CM et al (2016) Attentional function and basal forebrain cholinergic neuron morphology during aging in the Ts65Dn mouse model of down syndrome. Brain Struct Funct 221:4337–4352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-015-1164-y
Liu DP, Schmidt C, Billings T, Davisson MT (2003) Quantitative PCR genotyping assay for the Ts65Dn mouse model of down syndrome. Biotechniques 35:1170–1178
Hernández S, Gilabert-Juan J, Blasco-Ibáñez JM et al (2012) Altered expression of neuropeptides in the primary somatosensory cortex of the down syndrome model Ts65Dn. Neuropeptides 46:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npep.2011.10.002
West MJ, Abercrombie M, Baddeley AJ et al (1993) New stereological methods for counting neurons. Neurobiol Aging 14:275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-4580(93)90112-O
Nacher J, Alonso-Llosa G, Rosell D, McEwen B (2002) PSA-NCAM expression in the piriform cortex of the adult rat modulation by NMDA receptor antagonist administration. Brain Res 927:111–121
Gundersen HJG, Jensen EBV, Kiêu K, Nielsen J (1999) The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology: reconsidered. J Microsci 193:199–211. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.1999.00457.x
Van Lieshout EM, Van der Heijden I, Hendriks WJ, Van der Zee CE (2001) A decrease in size and number of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons is paralleled by diminished hippocampal cholinergic innervation in mice lacking leukocyte common antigen-related protein tyrosine phosphatase activity. Neuroscience 102:833–841
Guirado R, Sanchez-Matarredona D, Varea E et al (2012) Chronic fluoxetine treatment in middle-aged rats induces changes in the expression of plasticity-related molecules and in neurogenesis. BMC Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-13-5
Carbonell J, Blasco-Ibáñez JM, Crespo C et al (2020) Piriform cortex alterations in the Ts65Dn model for down syndrome. Brain Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2020.147031
Varea E, Blasco-Ibáñez JM, Gómez-Climent MA et al (2007) Chronic fluoxetine treatment increases the expression of PSA-NCAM in the medial prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology 32:803–812. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1301183
Contestabile A, Fila T, Bartesaghi R et al (2006) Choline acetyltransferase activity at different ages in brain of Ts65Dn mice, an animal model for down’s syndrome and related neurodegenerative diseases. J Neurochem 97:515–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03769.x
Parisotto EB, Vidal V, García-Cerro S et al (2016) Chronic melatonin administration reduced oxidative damage and cellular senescence in the hippocampus of a mouse model of down syndrome. Neurochem Res 41:2904–2913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-016-2008-8
Siarey RJ, Kline-Burgess A, Cho M et al (2006) Altered signaling pathways underlying abnormal hippocampal synaptic plasticity in the Ts65Dn mouse model of down syndrome. J Neurochem. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03971.x
Mufson EJ, Bothwell M, Hersh LB, Kordower JH (1989) Nerve growth factor receptor immunoreactive profiles in the normal, aged human basal forebrain: colocalization with cholinergic neurons. J Comp Neurol 285:196–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902850204
Hunter CL, Isacson O, Nelson M et al (2003) Regional alterations in amyloid precursor protein and nerve growth factor across age in a mouse model of down’s syndrome. Neurosci Res 45:437–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-0102(03)00005-1
Hunter CL, Bachman D, Granholm AC (2004) Minocycline prevents cholinergic loss in a mouse model of down’s syndrome. Ann Neurol 56:675–688. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20250
Greber-Platzer S, Balcz B, Cairns N, Lubec G (1999) c-fos expression in brains of patients with down syndrome. J Neural Transm Suppl 57:75–85
Braudeau J, Dauphinot L, Duchon A et al (2011) Chronic treatment with a promnesiant GABA-A α5 -selective inverse agonist increases immediate early genes expression during memory processing in mice and rectifies their expression levels in a Down syndrome mouse model. Adv Pharmacol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/153218
Sommer CA, Pavarino-Bertelli EC, Goloni-Bertollo EM, Henrique-Silva F (2008) Identification of dysregulated genes in lymphocytes from children with down syndrome. Genome 51:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1139/G07-100
Sugita S, Fleming LL, Wood C et al (2016) VAChT overexpression increases acetylcholine at the synaptic cleft and accelerates aging of neuromuscular junctions. Skelet Muscle 6:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13395-016-0105-7
Seo H, Isacson O (2005) Abnormal APP, cholinergic and cognitive function in Ts65Dn down’s model mice. Exp Neurol 193:469–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.11.017
Schliebs R, Arendt T (2011) The cholinergic system in aging and neuronal degeneration. Behav Brain Res 221:555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.11.058
Dasari S, Gulledge AT (2011) M1 and M4 receptors modulate hippocampal pyramidal neurons. J Neurophysiol 105:779–792. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00686.2010
Anagnostaras SG, Murphy GG, Hamilton SE et al (2003) Selective cognitive dysfunction in acetylcholine M1 muscarinic receptor mutant mice. Nat Neurosci 6:51–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn992
Smith CJ, Perry EK, Perry RH et al (1988) Muscarinic cholinergic receptor subtypes in hippocampus in human cognitive disorders. J Neurochem 50:847–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1988.tb02990.x
Huang EJ, Reichardt LF (2001) Neurotrophins: roles in neuronal development and function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:677–736. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.677
Mok SA, Lund K, Campenot RB (2009) A retrograde apoptotic signal originating in NGF-deprived distal axons of rat sympathetic neurons in compartmented cultures. Cell Res 19:546–560. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2009.11
Guidi S, Bonasoni P, Ceccarelli C et al (2008) Neurogenesis impairment and increased cell death reduce total neuron number in the hippocampal region of fetuses with down syndrome. Brain Pathol 18:180–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.2007.00113.x
Contestabile A, Fila T, Ceccarelli C et al (2007) Cell cycle alteration and decreased cell proliferation in the hippocampal dentate gyrus and in the neocortical germinal matrix of fetuses with down syndrome and in Ts65Dn mice. Hippocampus 17:665–678. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20308
Rueda N, Flórez J, Martínez-Cué C (2011) The Ts65Dn mouse model of down syndrome shows reduced expression of the Bcl-X L antiapoptotic protein in the hippocampus not accompanied by changes in molecular or cellular markers of cell death. Int J Dev Neurosci 29:711–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2011.06.001
López-Hidalgo R, Ballestín R, Vega J et al (2016) Hypocellularity in the murine model for down syndrome Ts65Dn is not affected by adult neurogenesis. Front Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00075
Baar MP, Brandt RMC, Putavet DA et al (2017) Targeted apoptosis of senescent cells restores tissue homeostasis in response to chemotoxicity and aging. Cell 169:132–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.031
Saez-Atienzar S, Masliah E (2020) Cellular senescence and Alzheimer disease: the egg and the chicken scenario. Nat Rev Neurosci 21:433–444
Baker DJ, Petersen RC (2018) Cellular senescence in brain aging and neurodegenerative diseases: evidence and perspectives. J Clin Invest 128:1208–1216
Xue W, Zender L, Miething C et al (2007) Senescence and tumour clearance is triggered by p53 restoration in murine liver carcinomas. Nature 445:656–660
Freund A, Orjalo AV, Desprez PY, Campisi J (2010) Inflammatory networks during cellular senescence: causes and consequences. Trends Mol Med 16:238–246
Ovadya Y, Landsberger T, Leins H et al (2018) Impaired immune surveillance accelerates accumulation of senescent cells and aging. Nat Commun 6:5435
Pinto B, Morelli G, Rastogi M et al (2020) Rescuing over-activated microglia restores cognitive performance in juvenile animals of the Dp(16) mouse model of down syndrome. Neuron 108:887–904
Busciglio J, Yankner BA (1995) Apoptosis and increased generation of reactive oxygen species in down’s syndrome neurons in vitro. Nature 378:776–779. https://doi.org/10.1038/378776a0
Lu H, Huang H (2011) FOXO1: A Potential Target for Human Diseases. Curr Drug Targ 12:1235–1244. https://doi.org/10.2174/138945011796150280
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. This work was supported by Jerome Lejeune Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by AC, AS and AM. The first draft of the manuscript was written by EV and MK and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical Approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the University of Valencia (13-02-2015/Grant No 2015/VSC/PEA/00046).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kirstein, M., Cambrils, A., Segarra, A. et al. Cholinergic Senescence in the Ts65Dn Mouse Model for Down Syndrome. Neurochem Res 47, 3076–3092 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-022-03659-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-022-03659-0