Abstract
The A11 dopaminergic cell group is the only group among the A8–A16 dopaminergic cell groups that includes neurons innervating the spinal cord, and a decrease in dopaminergic transmission at the spinal cord is thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of restless legs syndrome. However, the mechanisms regulating the neuronal activity of A11 dopaminergic neurons remain to be elucidated. Unraveling the neuronal composition, distribution and connectivity of A11 neurons would provide insights into the mechanisms regulating the spinal dopaminergic system. To address this, we performed immunohistochemistry for calcium-binding proteins such as calbindin (Calb) and parvalbumin (PV), in combination with the retrograde tracer Fluorogold (FG) injected into the spinal cord. Immunohistochemistry for Calb, PV, or tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), a marker for dopaminergic neurons, revealed that there were at least three types of neurons in the A11 region: neurons expressing Calb, TH, or both TH and Calb, whereas there were no PV-immunoreactive (IR) cell bodies. Both Calb- and PV-IR processes were found throughout the entire A11 region, extending in varied directions depending on the level relative to bregma. We found retrogradely labeled FG-positive neurons expressing TH, Calb, or both TH and Calb, as well as FG-positive neurons lacking both TH and Calb. These findings indicate that the A11 region is composed of a variety of neurons that are distinct in their neurochemical properties, and suggest that the diencephalospinal dopamine system may be regulated at the A11region by both Calb-IR and PV-IR processes, and at the terminal region of the spinal cord by Calb-IR processes derived from the A11 region.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Dopamine plays crucial roles in a variety of physiological functions such as reward, motor function, motivation, goal-directed behavior, memory, learning and pain [1–3]. Dopaminergic neurons are enriched in several brain regions designated as A8–A16 [1]. Among these, the A11 dopaminergic system is the only dopaminergic system that gives rise to descending projections to the spinal cord [2, 4, 5]. In addition to these particular neural connections, the fact that dopaminergic receptors are present in the spinal cord, and that dopamine receptor agonists alleviate the symptoms of restless legs syndrome (RLS), led to the hypothesis that hypo-activity of A11 neurons is a contributing factor in the pathogenesis of RLS [3]. However, the mechanisms regulating or modulating the A11 dopaminergic system remain to be elucidated.
Regarding the regulation or modulation of activity of the A11 dopaminergic system, electron microscopy revealed that dopaminergic neurons of the A11 region were innervated by inhibitory inputs of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAergic) terminals [6]. However, it is unknown whether the terminals of these GABAergic neurons are derived from neighboring neurons or from other brain entities outside the A11 region, or whether excitatory inputs innervate the dopaminergic neurons of the A11 dopaminergic system. Several recent lines of evidence have suggested functional heterogeneity of the A11 region, in which distinct components of the A11 region carry out distinct physiological functions. For example, Pappas et al. demonstrated that neurons in the caudal aspect of the A11 region have more responsibility for dopamine release at the spinal cord than those in the rostral aspect [7]. Abdallah et al. demonstrated that neurons in the rostral to middle aspect of the A11 region are more activated than those in the caudal part during migraine [8]. However, it is unknown whether the A11 region has heterogeneity in its morphological organization.
Many regions of the central nervous system have been found to display heterogeneity in neuronal composition using immunohistochemistry for calcium-binding proteins as distinctive markers for many neuronal populations [9]. These areas include the cortex, substantia nigra [10], ventral tegmental area [11], thalamus [12], striatum, nucleus accumbens [13, 14], spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion [15]. In the A11 region, it was reported that almost all of the dopaminergic neurons (93% of TH-positive neurons) express calretinin and only a small population of dopaminergic neurons (9% of TH-positive neurons) express calbindin (Calb) [9]. To investigate the organization and neuronal composition of the A11 region, with emphasis on the distribution and connectivity of non-TH neurons, which may regulate or modulate the dopaminergic neurons, we performed immunohistochemistry for TH, Calb and PV.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Adult male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats (Charles River, Tsukuba, Japan) were housed under temperature- and humidity-controlled conditions on a 12-h light/dark cycle with ad libitum access to food and water. All experiments were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Animal Research Committees of Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and the number of animals used in the study.
Fluorogold Retrograde Tracer Injections
In five 8-week-old SD male rats, laminectomy was performed over the spinal cord region of interest. Unilateral injections of Fluorogold (FG; Fluorochrome, Englewood, CO) were placed between the L2 and L5 level of the spinal cord. FG (4%) was dissolved in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate and delivered using an iontophoresis pump (Kation Scientific, Minneapolis, MN) for 20 min with 7-s on/off intervals and positive pulses of 5 µA through a 1.0-mm glass pipette with a tip diameter of 50 µm. After the surgical procedure, the animals were maintained for 30 days before perfusion, to allow time for the neuronal tracer to be retrogradely transported.
Sample Preparation for Anatomical Analysis
Four 8-week-old SD male rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (Kyoritsu Seiyaku, Tokyo, Japan) and transcardially perfused with 0.9% saline, followed by a fixative containing 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB). Rat brains were removed and immersed in the fixative solution at 4 °C overnight. The solution was replaced with 30% sucrose solution, and brains were frozen in dry ice powder. Sixteen-micrometer-thick coronal sections from rat brains were cut in a cryostat and collected sequentially in six receptacles containing 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PB. Sections were then put in a cryoprotectant solution containing 30% polyethylene glycol and 30% sucrose and stored at −20 °C until use.
Immunohistochemistry
Consecutive sections were rinsed several times with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.3% Tween 20 (PBS-T). The free-floating sections were then put in a blocking solution containing 4% bovine serum albumin in PBS-T. After incubation in the blocking solution for 1 h, sections were put in a blocking solution with primary antibody directed against TH (1:500 dilution, Cat#AB152, Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), Calb (1:500 dilution, Cat#C9848, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), PV (1:500 dilution, Cat#P3088, Sigma-Aldrich) or glutamate decarboxylase (GAD; 1:500, Cat#AB1511, Millipore) at 4 °C overnight. The specificity of these primary antibodies was confirmed by comparison of the immunostaining patterns with those of previous reports (Supplementary Information). Sections were then incubated for 2 h at room temperature in a 1:200 dilution of the fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 568, Cat#A11036 for TH or GAD; Alexa Fluor 488, Cat#A11001 for Calb or PV, Invitrogen, Chicago, IL). After rinsing with PBS-T, sections were examined under a fluorescence microscope.
Data Analysis
The histological material was examined with an AX80 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a DP-72 CCD camera (Olympus) and digital images were acquired using a BZ-X700 (Keyence, Tokyo, Japan) or BX-51 (Olympus) light microscope equipped with a DP-73 CCD camera (Olympus). All digital images were processed with Adobe Photoshop CC (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA). The nomenclature and boundaries of brain regions were determined using the Rat Brain Atlas [16].
Cell Counting
Acquired digital images were analyzed for a cell counting and a cellular co-expression of TH, calbindin, or FG. We examined sections at intervals of 120 µm (every sixth section of 20-µm-thick sections) throughout the A11 region and compared the number and distributions of each type of cell at three levels, in which a previous study reported that TH neurons exhibit distinct distributions [7]. A neuron was considered as a positive neuron when immunoreactivity was at least 5 µm in diameter and it was observed in the entire cell body. A neuron was considered as a double or triple labeled cell when immunofluorescent pattern through one channel was the same with that through another channel without changing the focus.
Measurement of a Length of a Long Axis of TH-IR Neurons
A length of a long axis of TH-IR cell within the A11 region or outside of the A11 region was measured using a tool in an application software of Adobe Photoshop CC.
Results
Distribution of Calbindin-Immunoreactive Cell Bodies and Processes within the A11 Region
To determine whether Calb-IR neurons were present in the A11 region, we performed double-fluorescence immunohistochemistry for Calb and TH. The A11 region was readily identified on the basis of the presence of large cell bodies of TH neurons (arrows in Fig. 1). These A11 TH-IR neurons were distinguishable from small TH-IR neurons (arrowheads in Fig. 1c) belonging to other dopaminergic cell groups. Actually, we measured the long axes of the TH-IR neurons within the A11 region and those outside of the A11 region. The average size of the TH-IR neurons within the A11 region were 31.54 ± 0.9 µm (mean ± SEM, n = 78) and those outside of the A11 region was 15.66 ± 0.5 µm (mean ± SEM, n = 12). We examined sections at intervals of 120 µm (every sixth section of 20-µm-thick sections) throughout the A11 region and detected Calb-IR cell bodies throughout the entire rostro-caudal extent of the A11 region, as defined by the presence of large TH-IR neurons. Calb-IR neurons were not distributed homogeneously within the A11 region and exhibited a gradient of distribution along the rostro-caudal axis (Fig. 1a’–c’).
At the rostral level (−3.24 mm from bregma), many intensely Calb-IR cell bodies were found scattered within the A11 region, as well as in the thalamus, which is dorsal to the mammillothalamic tract (mt), and the hypothalamus, which is ventral to the mt (Fig. 1a’). At higher magnification (Fig. 2a–a”), we found Calb-IR neurons intermingled with TH-IR neurons. Neurons co-expressing both TH and Calb as well as neurons expressing either TH (arrows) or Calb (open triangles) were detected (Fig. 3; Table 1). Among the cell bodies of these TH- and Calb-expressing neurons, Calb-IR long processes were found extending in a horizontal direction close to the cell bodies of TH-IR neurons (Fig. 2a”).
At the middle level (−4.16 mm from bregma), we found a large number of intensely Calb-IR cell bodies within the A11 region. The density of Calb-IR cells was higher at this level than that at the rostral level. Those Calb-IR cell bodies were intermingled with those of TH-IR cells, which were located in the ventral aspect of the A11 region (Fig. 1b, b’). Similar to the rostral level, three types of cells, cells co-expressing both TH and Calb (double arrows in Fig. 2b–b”), cells expressing TH and lacking Calb (arrows in Fig. 2b–b”), and cells lacking TH and expressing Calb (open triangles in Fig. 2b–b”) were observed at this level (Fig. 3; Table 1). We also observed more Calb-IR processes at this level than those at the rostral level, and these extended in various directions close to the TH-IR cell bodies.
At the caudal level (−4.44 mm from bregma), many Calb-IR cell bodies were observed. The density of the Calb-IR cell bodies was higher than that at the rostral level, and lower than that at the middle of the A11 region. We occasionally detected neurons expressing both Calb and TH as well as neurons expressing either TH or Calb (Fig. 2c–c”, Fig. 3; Table 1).
Distribution of Parvalbumin-Immunoreactive Cell Bodies and Processes within the A11 Region
Parvalbumin (PV) is another calcium-binding protein, mainly expressed in fast-firing GABAergic neurons in many brain regions. To examine whether neurons expressing PV are present in the A11 region, we performed fluorescent immunolabeling for PV as well as double-fluorescent immunolabeling for GAD and TH. There were a large number of intensely GAD-IR processes in the rostral (Fig. 4a’) and caudal (Fig. 4c’) aspects of the A11 region, and weaker GAD immunoreactivity was observed in the thalamus (upper region in Fig. 4a”) and the middle aspect of the A11 region (Fig. 4b”). In contrast to the Calb immunoreactivity, PV-IR neuronal cell bodies were not detected, even though many PV-IR processes were detected throughout the A11 region (Fig. 4a’–f’). The length and direction of these PV-IR processes varied depending on the distance from bregma.
At the rostral level (−3.24 mm from bregma), many PV-IR processes were observed among TH-IR cell bodies (arrows in Fig. 4d–d”). These PV-IR processes (open triangles) were visible in the coronal sections as short processes extending in various directions, and appeared to be transverse sections of PV-IR processes extending in the rostral-caudal direction.
At the middle level (−4.16 mm from bregma), many PV-IR processes (open triangles) were observed as we observed at the rostral level. In contrast to the PV-IR processes observed at the rostral level, we observed many long processes extending in the ventral-dorsal direction (Fig. 4e’).
At the caudal level (−4.44 mm from bregma), we also observed many processes within the A11 region. Similar to the middle level of the A11, these processes were long processes (open triangles) in the coronal sections, extending in the ventral-dorsal direction (Fig. 4f’).
Retrograde Tracer Fluorogold Injected in the Rat Spinal Cord
We detected many retrogradely labeled FG-positive neurons within the A11 region of rats maintained for 1 month after FG injection into the spinal cord. Several types of FG-positive neurons were detected, including FG-positive neurons co-expressing both TH and Calb (double arrows in 5b–5bb”), and those expressing TH but not expressing Calb (arrows in Fig. 5b–bb”). There were also FG-positive non-TH neurons expressing Calb (arrowheads in Fig. 5c–cc”) and lacking Calb (double arrowheads in Fig. 5c–cc”) within the A11 region. Although weak TH immunoreactivity or Calb immunoreactivity were observed in the location indicated by the double-arrowhead, immunoreactivities were not in the cell body, but rather in the processes. Immunoreactivity did not spread to the entire cell body, such as in the TH-IR cell bodies (arrows or double-arrows) or Calb-IR cell bodies (double-arrows or arrowheads). In addition to these FG-positive cells, we detected a few TH neurons that were not labeled by FG (open triangles in Fig. 5d–dd”).
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrated that the A11 region consists of a variety of neurons that are distinct in their neurochemical properties, using antibodies to TH and calcium-binding proteins. We observed that Calb-IR cell bodies of A11 neurons were intermingled with TH-IR cell bodies, and that Calb-IR cell bodies exhibited a characteristic distribution throughout the entire A11 region with processes extending among TH-IR neurons. In contrast to the profile of immunoreactivity for Calb, we did not detect any PV-IR cell bodies in this region even though we observed many PV-IR processes. Retrograde tracer experiments revealed that a variety of FG-positive neurons, including TH neurons either expressing or lacking Calb as well as non-TH neurons, projected to the rat spinal cord.
Neuronal Heterogeneity Within the A11 Region
A growing body of evidence has been accumulating, showing that dopaminergic cell groups including A8–A10 consist of not only dopaminergic neurons but also a variety of neurons distinct in their neurochemical properties [11, 13, 14, 17–26]. However, it is unclear whether the A11 region is similar to other dopaminergic cell groups in the heterogeneity of its neuronal composition. We demonstrated that there were subpopulations of TH-positive neurons; some co-expressed Calb and some did not express Calb. In addition to these TH-positive neurons, the A11 region also contained non-TH neurons expressing Calb and non-TH neurons lacking Calb. These results demonstrated that the A11 region is also heterogeneous in neuronal composition, similar to other dopaminergic cell groups. Calbindin utilization allows for observation of non-TH neurons in the A11 region in intact animals without any pretreatments (such as a tracer injection or colchicine treatment for visualization of GAD-IR cells), and a greater number of non-TH neurons can be visualized compared with GAD-IR neurons or retrograde-labeled neurons.
Calbindin-Immunoreactive Cell Bodies
It has long been known that there are two subpopulations of dopaminergic neurons in the midbrain with respect to expression of Calb (TH neurons expressing Calb and TH neurons lacking Calb), and that these subpopulations are distinct in their connectivity and physiological properties [10, 13, 14, 27]. For instance, midbrain dopaminergic neurons expressing Calb preferentially project to the matrix of the striatum and are considered to be invulnerable to neurodegeneration [13, 14]. On the other hand, dopaminergic neurons lacking Calb preferentially project to the patches of the striatum and are considered to be vulnerable to neurodegeneration [13, 14]. Our finding that some TH neurons express Calb may indicate that there are two subpopulations of TH neurons, distinct in their connectivity and/or physiological properties, within the A11 region. Although it remains to be shown whether differential functional role exists between Calb-expressing TH-positive neurons and Calb-lacking TH-positive neurons in the A11 region, our findings of differential Calb immunoreactivity among TH neurons could help further investigations into the electrophysiological properties and a connectivity of these neurons.
In many brain regions, Calb-expressing neurons play a modulatory role. Calb-expressing neurons of the pedunculopontine nucleus include three types of neurons: glutamatergic, GABAergic, and cholinergic neurons. These neurons innervate the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and modulate the activity of dopaminergic neurons of the VTA [28, 29]. In the medial thalamus, such as the reuniens nucleus and ventromedial nucleus, half of the Calb-IR cells are co-localized with an excitatory neurotransmitter, aspartate or glutamate [30]. We demonstrated that Calb-IR cell bodies are present close to the TH-IR cell bodies, and many Calb-IR processes were extending among TH-IR cell bodies in the A11 region. Taken together, our findings may indicate that these Calb-IR neurons regulate the activity of the TH-IR neurons of the A11 region, though we were unable to exclude the possibility that these Calb-IR processes derived from outside of the A11 region.
Parvalbumin-Immunoreactive Fibers
Electron microscopy has revealed that A11 dopaminergic neurons, as well as other hypothalamic dopaminergic neurons, are innervated by GABAergic terminals [6]. GABAergic neurons are classified into several groups on the basis of their neurochemical properties and one subpopulation of GABAergic neurons express PV [31]. However, the origin of these GABAergic neurons has not yet been identified. In the present study, we observed intensely GAD-IR processes within the A11 region as well as in the hypothalamus, and we only detected weakly PV-IR processes in A11, even though there were intensely PV-IR processes in the surrounding area. These results indicate that A11 dopaminergic neurons are mainly regulated or modulated by a PV-lacking subgroup of GABAergic neurons. In addition, we did not detect any PV-IR cell bodies within the A11 region, in spite of several reports demonstrating that GABAergic neurons are present in this region [8, 32, 33]. Taken together, these results may indicate that non-PV-IR GABAergic neurons within or outside the A11 region regulate the activity of dopaminergic neurons of the A11 region.
Regional Heterogeneity of the A11 Region
Several lines of evidence have suggested that the A11 region exhibits functional heterogeneity. For instance, GABAergic neurons in the rostral to middle aspect of the A11 region are activated when facial nociceptive stimulation is applied [8]. TH neurons of the caudal A11 region are more responsible for dopamine release at the rat spinal cord than those of the rostral A11 region [7]. Our study revealed that coronal sections from the rostral levels of the A11 region contained short PV-IR processes that varied in direction, while the caudal levels of the A11 region contained long PV-IR processes in the perpendicular direction, indicating that processes observed in the rostral aspects of A11 were extending in the rostro-caudal direction and processes observed in the caudal aspects were extending in the ventral-dorsal direction. These results indicate that the A11 region has morphological heterogeneity along the rostral-caudal axis and part of the functional heterogeneity suggested by previous studies [7, 8] may attribute to the differential morphological property between the rostral and caudal aspect of the A11 region, such as different origin of inputs or differential connectivity of neurons in each subregion.
Functional Significance
Hypoactivity of the A11 dopaminergic neurons is considered a contributing factor of the restless legs syndrome. However, it is largely unknown how these A11 dopaminergic neurons are regulated. There are several reports suggesting the regulation of the A11 dopaminergic neurons. Electron microscopy have revealed that GABAergic terminals make a synapse on the A11 dopaminergic neurons [6] and Pappas et al. demonstrated that opioid administration increase the amount of release of the dopamine at the spinal cord, suggesting that A11 dopaminergic activity increases through a ‘dis-inhibitory’ mechanism, which maybe GABAergic inputs [34]. However, the origin of these GABAergic inputs to the A11 dopaminergic neurons remain to be elucidated. We demonstrated that the A11 region consists of not only dopaminergic neurons but also non-TH neurons surrounding A11 TH neurons. Although we need further investigation to determine the neurochemical nature of these non-TH neurons, and whether these non-TH neurons may regulate the neighboring TH neurons electrophysiologically, our results demonstrated the possibility that A11 dopaminergic neurons are regulated locally.
Projection to the Spinal Cord
Dopaminergic (TH-positive) projections from the A11 region to the spinal cord have been reported previously [2, 4, 5, 33]. In these previous studies, it was also reported that there were projections to the spinal cord derived from both non-TH and TH neurons of the A11 region. However, the neurochemical nature of the non-TH neurons remains to be elucidated. Some reports demonstrated that these non-TH neurons are GABAergic neurons by immunohistochemistry for GAD 65/67 [33], but Kosaka et al. reported that it is hard to detect GABAergic neurons of the A11 region by immunohistochemistry for GAD without colchicine treatment [32]. It is likely that only a small population of intensely GAD-positive neurons projecting to the spinal cord were detected by immunohistochemistry for GAD. In the present study, we demonstrated that several types of A11 neurons, including TH neurons, TH neurons co-expressing Calb, non-TH neurons expressing Calb and non-TH neurons lacking Calb, all project to the rat spinal cord. Although further investigations are needed to determine whether these non-TH neurons are excitatory or inhibitory, our results indicate that the descending pain inhibitory system via dopaminergic neurons is regulated by a variety of neurons with distinct neurochemical properties, both within the terminal region of the A11 neurons at the spinal cord and locally within the A11 region.
References
Björklund A, Dunnett SB (2007) Dopamine neuron systems in the brain: an update. Trends Neurosci 30(5):194–202
Skagerberg G, Lindvall O (1985) Organization of diencephalic dopamine neurons projecting to the spinal cord in the rat. Brain Res 342(2):340–351
Thorpe AJ, Clair A, Hochman S, Clemens S (2011) Possible sites of therapeutic action in restless legs syndrome: focus on dopamine and α2δ ligands. Eur Neurol 66(1):18–29
Charbit AR, Akerman S, Holland PR, Goadsby PJ (2009) Neurons of the dopaminergic/calcitonin gene-related peptide A11 cell group modulate neuronal firing in the trigeminocervical complex: an electrophysiological and immunohistochemical study. J Neurosci 29(40):12532–12541
Koblinger K, Füzesi T, Ejdrygiewicz J, Krajacic A, Bains JS, Whelan PJ (2014) Characterization of A11 neurons projecting to the spinal cord of mice. PLoS ONE 9(10):e109636
van den Pol AN (1986) Tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactive neurons throughout the hypothalamus receive glutamate decarboxylase immunoreactive synapses: a double pre-embedding immunocytochemical study with particulate silver and HRP. J Neurosci 6(3):877–891
Pappas SS, Tiernan CT, Behrouz B, Jordan CL, Breedlove SM, Goudreau JL et al (2010) Neonatal androgen-dependent sex differences in lumbar spinal cord dopamine concentrations and the number of A11 diencephalospinal dopamine neurons. J Comp Neurol 518(13):2423–2436
Abdallah K, Monconduit L, Artola A, Luccarini P, Dallel R (2015) GABAAergic inhibition or dopamine denervation of the A11 hypothalamic nucleus induces trigeminal analgesia. Pain 156(4):644–655
Rogers JH (1992) Immunohistochemical markers in rat brain: colocalization of calretinin and calbindin-D28k with tyrosine hydroxylase. Brain Res 587(2):203–210
González-Hernández T, Rodríguez M (2000) Compartmental organization and chemical profile of dopaminergic and GABAergic neurons in the substantia nigra of the rat. J Comp Neurol 421(1):107–135
Olson VG, Nestler EJ (2007) Topographical organization of GABAergic neurons within the ventral tegmental area of the rat. Synapse 61(2):87–95
Arai R, Jacobowitz DM, Deura S (1994) Distribution of calretinin, calbindin-D28k, and parvalbumin in the rat thalamus. Brain Res Bull 33(5):595–614
Gerfen CR, Baimbridge KG, Thibault J (1987) The neostriatal mosaic: III. Biochemical and developmental dissociation of patch-matrix mesostriatal systems. J Neurosci 7(12):3935–3944
Gerfen CR, Herkenham M, Thibault J (1987) The neostriatal mosaic: II. Patch- and matrix-directed mesostriatal dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic systems. J Neurosci 7(12):3915–3934
Celio MR (1990) Calbindin D-28k and parvalbumin in the rat nervous system. Neuroscience 35(2):375–475
Paxinos G, Watson C (2007) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Academic Press/Elsevier, Boston.
Carr DB, Sesack SR (2000) GABA-containing neurons in the rat ventral tegmental area project to the prefrontal cortex. Synapse 38(2):114–123
Gorelova N, Mulholland PJ, Chandler LJ, Seamans JK (2012) The glutamatergic component of the mesocortical pathway emanating from different subregions of the ventral midbrain. Cereb Cortex 22(2):327–336
Kawano M, Kawasaki A, Sakata-Haga H, Fukui Y, Kawano H, Nogami H et al (2006) Particular subpopulations of midbrain and hypothalamic dopamine neurons express vesicular glutamate transporter 2 in the rat brain. J Comp Neurol 498(5):581–592
Li X, Qi J, Yamaguchi T, Wang HL, Morales M (2013) Heterogeneous composition of dopamine neurons of the rat A10 region: molecular evidence for diverse signaling properties. Brain Struct Funct 218 (5):1159–1176
Nair-Roberts RG, Chatelain-Badie SD, Benson E, White-Cooper H, Bolam JP, Ungless MA (2008) Stereological estimates of dopaminergic, GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area, substantia nigra and retrorubral field in the rat. Neuroscience 152(4):1024–1031
Tsumori T, Qin Y, Yokota S, Niu JG, Yasui Y (2010) Central amygdaloid axon terminals are in contact with retrorubral field neurons that project to the parvicellular reticular formation of the medulla oblongata in the rat. Brain Res 1306:18–28
Yamaguchi T, Sheen W, Morales M (2007) Glutamatergic neurons are present in the rat ventral tegmental area. Eur J Neurosci 25(1):106–118
Yamaguchi T, Wang HL, Li X, Ng TH, Morales M (2011) Mesocorticolimbic glutamatergic pathway. J Neurosci 31(23):8476–8490
Yamaguchi T, Wang HL, Morales M (2013) Glutamate neurons in the substantia nigra compacta and retrorubral field. Eur J Neurosci 38(11):3602–3610
Yamaguchi T, Qi J, Wang HL, Zhang S, Morales M (2015) Glutamatergic and dopaminergic neurons in the mouse ventral tegmental area. Eur J Neurosci 41(6):760–772
Neuhoff H, Neu A, Liss B, Roeper J (2002) I(h) channels contribute to the different functional properties of identified dopaminergic subpopulations in the midbrain. J Neurosci 22(4):1290–1302
Wang HL, Morales M (2009) Pedunculopontine and laterodorsal tegmental nuclei contain distinct populations of cholinergic, glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in the rat. Eur J Neurosci 29(2):340–358
Martinez-Gonzalez C, Wang HL, Micklem BR, Bolam JP, Mena-Segovia J (2012) Subpopulations of cholinergic, GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons in the pedunculopontine nucleus contain calcium-binding proteins and are heterogeneously distributed. Eur J Neurosci 35(5):723–734
Frassoni C, Spreafico R, Bentivoglio M (1997) Glutamate, aspartate and co-localization with calbindin in the medial thalamus. An immunohistochemical study in the rat. Exp Brain Res 115(1):95–104
Hu H, Gan J, Jonas P (2014) Interneurons. Fast-spiking, parvalbumin+ GABAergic interneurons: from cellular design to microcircuit function. Science 345(6196):1255263
Kosaka T, Kosaka K, Hataguchi Y, Nagatsu I, Wu JY, Ottersen OP et al (1987) Catecholaminergic neurons containing GABA-like and/or glutamic acid decarboxylase-like immunoreactivities in various brain regions of the rat. Exp Brain Res 66(1):191–210
Moriizumi T, Hattori T (1992) Anatomical and functional compartmentalization of the subparafascicular thalamic nucleus in the rat. Exp Brain Res 90(1):175–179
Pappas SS, Kennedy T, Goudreau JL, Lookingland KJ (2011) Opioid-mediated regulation of A11 diencephalospinal dopamine neurons: pharmacological evidence of activation by morphine. Neuropharmacol 61 (4):614–621.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Dokkyo Medical University. H.O. is the recipient of a Young Investigator award (No. 2015-21) from Dokkyo Medical University. We would like to thank Shukuko Nihei for excellent technical assistance.
Funding
This study was funded by a Young Investigator Award (Grant No. 2015-21 for H.O.) from Dokkyo Medical University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.
Additional information
Hidechika Ozawa and Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi have contributed equally to do this work.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ozawa, H., Yamaguchi, T., Hamaguchi, S. et al. Three Types of A11 Neurons Project to the Rat Spinal Cord. Neurochem Res 42, 2142–2153 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-017-2219-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-017-2219-7