Introduction

Most of the nitrides of the early transition metals are refractory materials with metallic electrical conductivity and in the case of TiN is actually more conductive than elemental Ti (Lengauer et al. 1995). Conductive nanowires are useful for a number of purposes such as the preparation of conductive transparent composites (Zhang and Engholm 2018; Lang et al. 2020), and inexpensive methods of bulk preparation of conductive nitride nanowires are desirable. Few methods exist for the direct synthesis of metal nitride nanowires (for some, see Joshi et al. 2005; Ding et al. 2013), but most of the early transition metal oxides, with the exception of ZrO2 and HfO2, can be converted to the nitrides by heating at 1200 °C or less under flowing NH3 (Gou et al. 2017; Mangamma et al. 2007; Howell et al. 2018; Tan et al. 1994; Sharma et al. 2001; Lerch 1996; Yu et al. 1998; Mosavati et al. 2016; Mosavati et al. 2017). The synthesis of early transition metal oxide nanowires by hydrothermal methods (Chen and Mao (2007), Wang et al. (2014)) in acidic (Perales-Martínez and Rodríguez-González 2017; Zhou et al. 2011; Cassaignon et al. (2007)) or alkaline solution has been described extensively (Hirao and Hasegawa 2010; Poudel et al. 2005; Zhang et al. 2010; Wei et al. 2006). What has not been explored as much is the conversion of these oxide nanowires to nitride nanowires. Most of the research done in this area consists of small quantities grown on a substrate and then annealed under NH3 flow to convert the oxide to a nitride (Qiu et al. 2010; Xihong et al. 2013) or production of bulk powders where particle shape was not a consideration (Drygas et al. 2006; Fei et al. 2011; Zhou et al. 2017). This has been successfully done but sometimes with poor shape retention. Since there is a net loss of atoms when converting oxides to nitrides, crumbling, porosity, or shrinkage would be expected to occur. Less research has been done on the conversion of bulk early transition metal oxide nanostructures to nitrides through a similar annealing method, which would allow for the bulk production of metal nitride nanorods or nanowires (Xiao et al. 2013; Song et al. 2014). Intriguingly, some reports describe excellent shape retention upon nitride conversion, as bulk TiO2 crystals were converted to porous TiN single crystals (Lin et al. 2018) and TiO2 nanostructures were converted to tubular TiN nanostructures (Zhang et al. 2017). In this work, we had the objective of preparing bulk quantities of metallic early transition metal nitride nanowires. To do this, we prepared nanorods and nanowires of titanium, vanadium, molybdenum, and tungsten oxides (and mixtures thereof) by hydrothermal methods and explored the conditions for nitride conversion with maximum shape retention.

Experimental

Oxide synthesis

All reagents were used without further purification: titanium dioxide 21 nm powder (Aldrich #718467 99.5%), sodium tungstate dehydrate (Fisher), ammonium vanadate (Fisher), titanium tetrachloride (Aldrich), sodium vanadate (Johnson Matthey 98%), and sodium molybdate (Aldrich 99 + %). All air-sensitive or extremely volatile reagents or products were handled in a dry box under argon or in a flow box under nitrogen, respectively. All water used in any reaction was distilled water. All metal oxide syntheses were carried out in a ~ 20 mL Teflon cup inside an acid digestion bomb (Parr 23 mL High Pressure Acid Digestion Bomb Model 4746) except for three alkaline reactions as denoted in Table 1. Reactions 10 -11 were carried out in a 1″ dia PTFE test tube inside a Newport Scientific preliminary test vessel assembly (cat # 41-19320) under autogenous pressure and 9 in a Teflon beaker in a Si oil bath with a watch glass on top to limit evaporation. The metal oxide source compound was added to water and stirred. The remaining reagents were then added in the appropriate fashion as indicated in Table 1. The vessel was then heated to a temperature between 110 and 215 °C for 20 h to 13 days. The resulting product was then washed with water, ethanol, and, in particular reactions, nitric acid to obtain the necessary neutralization.

Table 1 Reaction reagents and conditions for all hydrothermal metal oxide syntheses

Phosphonic acid synthesis was done in a manner similar to Vallant et al. 1998. (a) P(OEt)3 (55 g, 331 mmol) and C14H29Br (37.5 g, 135 mmol) was heated under N2 flow for 36 h at 110 °C and 3 h at 180 °C. Then, 100 mL concentrated HCl was added and mixture refluxed for 1 day and allowed to cool. The solids were filtered and washed with water and MeCN. Recrystallization from MeCN did not work, so product was recrystallized from CHCl3 and pumped dry. A total of 21.87 g C14H29PO3H2 (58%) was isolated. NMR: (31P, MeOH solution) 30.88 ppm. (b) Under N2 flow, 60 g (361 mmol) P(OEt)3 was heated to 180 °C, and C9H19I (36.84 g, 145 mmol) was added in 3–5 mL portions, with the volatiles (presumably EtI) allowed to clear before adding the next increment. After addition, allowed to stir for 12 h at 160 °C. Then refluxed with 100 mL conc HCl for 1 d, let cool, and extracted top layer with pentane, rotovapped, and material was recrystallized from hot MeCN. Product was filtered, washed with cold MeCN, and dried under vacuum. A total of 8.77 g (29%) C9H19PO3H2 was isolated. NMR: (31P, MeOH solution) 30.95 ppm.

Nitride synthesis

All nitridation reactions were completed in an alumina boat in a 1 in. OD quartz tube. The tube was heated by a silicon carbide heating element in a horizontal tube furnace with a 6 in. hot zone. The nitrogen and anhydrous ammonia used in these reactions were supplied by Air Products. The nitrogen was supplied by the boil-off from in-house stored liquid nitrogen, and the anhydrous ammonia was stored in and obtained from a container with a sodium amide drying agent in all reactions except 21. Both of these gasses passed through a ¼ in. piping manifold into the tube, and exited through a silicon oil bubbler which was vented to a fume hood.

In a typical reaction, a small amount of metal oxide was placed in the alumina boat which was placed on top of a glassware oven to air-dry. The boat was then placed in the quartz tube in the center of the tube furnace. If the sample was dried, only nitrogen gas flowed through the furnace initially, and ammonia was added later. The temperature was manually raised, via a controller, by differing rates, up to 800 or 900 °C and allowed to nitride at that temperature for differing amounts of time as seen in Table 2.

Table 2 Nitriding conditions for the conversion of several metal oxides to metal nitrides

Analysis and characterization

All product compositions were analyzed using XRD powder patterns from a Rigaku SmartLab 2080B212 3 kW powder X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation. The air-sensitive products were analyzed using an inert atmosphere sample holder with a Kapton window. All product nanostructures and some compositions were analyzed using a LEO-1550 FE-SEM to obtain SEM images and EDS data. Nitrides that appeared to be nanowires or nanorods were further analyzed through UV-Vis and IR spectra for samples that would suspend in ethanol or methylene chloride, respectively. Nitrogen BET analysis was done on some oxide and nitride product pairs on a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 absorption analyzer. Preliminary electrical conductivity measurements of the nitride products were done by placing a weighed small amount in a quartz tube sandwiched between two 5/32″ diameter steel rods, with the quartz tube clamped vertically, and a weight of 1192 g was placed on the top rod to put a consistent pressure on the sample, and the height was measured. A Fluke 111 multimeter was used to measure low voltage DC resistance, an Amprobe AMB-40 megohmmeter was used to measure high voltage resistance, and a BK Precision 878 LCR meter was used to measure capacitance and resistance at 1 KHz and 120 Hz. Because of the capacitance in 22 and 23, the oxide nanowires 11 were measured as well. The data are presented in Table 5. Raman spectra were measured on a Renishaw InVia Raman Microscope with a 514 or 785-nm excitation laser.

Results and discussion

Oxide nanorod and nanowire synthesis

Acidic hydrothermal reactions that made short TiO2 nanorods were done by adding TiCl4 to water, adding optional additives including NH4OH or long-chain phosphonic acid surfactants, and cooking the mixture hydrothermally in a Teflon acid digestion bomb at 215 °C (Table 148). In all cases, agglomerated spherical structures composed of short TiO2 nanorods or nanoparticles were formed, which were usually rutile phase, except for 8. Both 7 and 8, to which phosphonic acid surfactants were added, had more elongated nanorods than 46. SEM images of representative examples are shown in Fig. 1. Similar type structures have been reported by others from hydrothermal reactions involving Ti compounds in acidic media and are often described as nanoflowers (Perales-Martínez and Rodríguez-González 2017; Zhou et al. 2011; Cassaignon et al. 2007). Raman spectra (supporting information) are consistent with the XRD analysis except that the materials produced with phosphonic acids, 7 and 8, showed very high fluorescence at 514-nm excitation and had to be observed with a 785-nm laser to see the weak spectra. The most likely reason for this fluorescence is incorporation of phosphonate into those materials.

Fig. 1
figure 1

SEM images of the TiO2 nanoproducts from reaction (a) 4, (b) 5, (c) 6, and (d) 8. The product of 7 is shown later in Fig. 10

Since longer TiO2 nanowires were desired, alkaline synthesis reactions were used as well (Hirao and Hasegawa 2010). For these reactions 911, a commercially available TiO2 nanomaterial was subjected to hydrothermal conditions with an ~ 8 M NaOH solution, followed by washing with dilute HNO3 and water. As expected, long nanowires grew. Reactions 9 and 10 both formed distinct nanowires with diameters from 10 to 150 nm and lengths from 300 to 12 μm. The wires in 9 are much thinner and longer than those in 10, but 9 did not go to completion and a lot of the starting TiO2 material remained (Fig. 2). This difference is most likely due to the higher temperature and longer reaction time in 10. Reaction 11 was done at a slightly lower temperature and less time than 10. SEM images are shown in Fig. 2, and XRD powder patterns for the TiO2 nanomaterials are shown in Fig. 3. The powder pattern of 10 has the closest resemblance to Na2Ti3O7 (JCPDS 00-59-666), possibly as a result of incomplete acid washing, and 9 and 11 had very broad XRD lines that had the closest match to a hydrous titanium oxide (JCPDS 00-47-124). Heating 11 at 140 °C sharpened the broad XRD peaks a bit, and even heating under vacuum at 250 °C or 400 °C caused a mass loss of 28% (presumably water loss), but no change in the powder pattern, and very little change in the Raman spectra (supporting information).

Fig. 2
figure 2

SEM images of alkaline-synthesized nanowires (a) 9 and (b) 10 with the insets of the same sample at higher magnification. 11 is shown later in Fig. 12g

Fig. 3
figure 3

XRD patterns for all titanium oxide reactions (411) and their comparison to Anatase, Rutile, hydrous titanium oxide, and sodium titanium oxide phases. JCPDS numbers of reference patterns are indicated on the graph

Vanadium oxide is known to form high aspect ratio structures easily under hydrothermal conditions (Zhang et al. 2010; Xiao et al. 2013), so ammonium vanadate was used as a precursor in acidic hydrothermal reactions, with just added acid, acid and reducing agent, or in combination with Ti or other metals. Vanadium oxide nanowires readily formed in two of the reactions, with diameters and lengths ranging from 25 to 100 nm and 2–30 μm, respectively, in 1 and 3 (Fig. 4). Reaction 2, which used the V(III) precursor V(OH)2NH2 (Wu et al. 2011) however only formed nanocrystals. The nanowires were also shown to be either hydrous V2O5, V2O5, or VO2 through X-ray powder diffraction (Fig. 5). Reaction 3 produced well-formed VO2 nanowires using ethanol as a reducing agent (Wang et al. 2015). Therefore, it was hypothesized that ethanol may play a role in shape formation of other reducible metal oxides. This hypothesis was validated for tungsten when nanorod structures were produced in 17 with diameters varying from 50 to 500 nm and lengths varying from 150 to 2 μm (Fig. 4)

Fig. 4
figure 4

SEM images of vanadium oxides (a) 1, (b) 3, and tungsten oxide (c) 17

Fig. 5
figure 5

XRD patterns for products 1, 2, 3, 12A, and 14A, with matching JCPDS reference patterns indicated

Vanadium was used in conjunction with titanium and other metals in 1215 and 18 based on the hypothesis that vanadium would act as a nanowire structure directing agent while being substituted by other metal atoms. The expected result was nanowires that consisted of titanium-vanadium oxide for 1215 and tungsten-vanadium oxide in 18. Nanowires were produced in 12, 14, and 15. In 12 and 14, two main visible fractions resulted from the reaction; one fraction consisted of bright yellow solid chunks, and the other fraction was a finer conglomeration of brownish-green particles. These products (12 and 14) were incompletely separated into A and B fractions by washing away the finer particles in alcohol (the B fraction) and then sonicating the yellow solids until the conglomerations broke up into nanowires which were allowed to settle (the A fractions). The darker colored phase (12B, 14B) was mostly of the Anatase type by XRD, while the yellowish nanowires (12A, 14A) had powder patterns matching vanadium pentoxide and oxide hydrates. It was clear that elemental substitution did occur in the solid phases of 12 and 14 as can be seen in Fig. 6 and Table 3 where vanadium and titanium are both present throughout. Vanadium appears more concentrated on the mass of wires in the center of the 14 SEM/EDS map, but titanium is present also, showing that titanium is substituting into the vanadium oxide wires (Fig. 6). The EDS scan of 12 indicated similar results of titanium substituting for vanadium in some of the nanowire structures. EDS analysis of the solid products of all reactions that contained multiple metals appeared to show some substitution (Table 3). The mixed metal oxide nanowires formed from these reactions had diameters ranging from 50 to 100 nm and lengths from 2 to 28 μm (Figs. 7 and 8). The EDS analysis data showed the expected peaks for the respective elements in mixed metal nanostructures. Raman spectra (supporting information) are consistent with this phase identification. A lower concentration of NH4VO3 added to a titanium reaction (13) was not enough to sufficiently form long nanowires or rods (Fig. 8a). The addition of vanadium to a tungsten reaction also did not help nanowire formation, as 18 only formed nanoplates of irregular shapes (Fig. 8b), but single crystals of two compounds, sodium vanadate dihydrate and a POM cluster Na3(NH4)2V3W3O19(H2O)12, grew from the solution. The crystal structures of both compounds (supporting information) were reported previously (NaVO3.xH2O Björnberg and Hedman 1977; Evans 1988; Kato and Takayama 1984; Lukacs and Strusievici 1962; Na3(NH4)2V3W3O19(H2O)12 Xu et al. 1998), and our redetermination of the POM structure was virtually identical. Our structure of NaVO3.2H2O is very similar to the reported structures except that the previous reports show ~ 1.9 water molecules per Na, and our structure is stoichiometric. It is interesting that the POM salt crystallizes in this stoichiometry when in principle other V-W ratios and numbers of Na and NH4 cations should be possible. NMR and potentiometric studies have shown that solutions of tungstates and vanadates form a wide variety of polyoxometalates with different sizes and W-V ratios, although the W3V3O195− anion is favored in 50:50 mixtures (Andresson et al. 1996; Maksimovskaya et al. 1984; Rozantsev et al. 2002; Rozantsev and Sazonova 2005; Yerra et al. 2014). Even though substitution between V and W occur readily in molecular compounds, the limited amount of substitution in nanowires is likely due to the different crystal structures of the solid oxide phases.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Images of (a) SEM electron image, (b) EDS vanadium mapping, and (c) EDS titanium mapping for 14. The clump of nanowires (14A) is high in vanadium, but titanium is present throughout the material

Table 3 Composition data obtained via EDS for samples that contained multiple metals
Fig. 7
figure 7

Comparing 12B, 13, 14B, and 15 XRD patterns to Anatase and V2O5 reference patterns. JCPDS reference numbers are indicated on the graph

Fig. 8
figure 8

SEM images of (a) Ti-V oxide 13, (b) V-W oxide 18, (c) Ti-V oxide fraction 12A, and (d) Ti-V oxide fraction 14A with inset of the same sample at higher magnification

Fig. 9
figure 9

XRD pattern of Mo and W oxide nanowires formed in reactions 16, 17, and 18 compared with JCPDS reference patterns that best corresponded to the samples

Fig. 10
figure 10

SEM images of (a) TiO2 nanomaterial 7, and both TiN nanomaterials made from 7 [(b) 20 and (c) 21], illustrating the better shape retention with slower temperature ramping rate

Fig. 11
figure 11

Comparing XRD patterns for 1923 with reference patterns for titanium nitride, rutile, and Na2TiO3

Fig. 12
figure 12

SEM images of the oxide-nitride pairs: (a) V-Ti oxide 14A and (b) nitride nanowires 25; (c) MoO3 microrods 16, and after nitridation to Mo2N (d) 27; (e) Na2Ti3O7 nanowires 10, and after nitridation (f) nitride material 22, and finally (g) hydrous TiO2 nanofibers 11, and after nitridation (h) to fused TiN nanoparticles 23

Fig. 13
figure 13

XRD patterns for molybdenum and vanadium nitrides (2427)

Fig. 14
figure 14

UV-Vis spectra of nitrides 1923, 25, and 26 dispersed in ethanol

Hydrothermal synthesis of nanowires, nanotubes, and other high aspect ratio particles of MoO3 has been reported by many researchers (e.g., Xia et al. 2006; Muňoz-Espı et al. 2008; Dewangan et al. 2011; Hu and Wang 2008). We did one reaction (16), which made molybdenum oxide materials (Fig. 9). This formed very large, almost microrods with diameters and lengths extending from 0.5 to 1.5 μm and 30–100 μm (Fig. 12d). The XRD pattern of this material did not match any reference patterns exactly, but the prominent peaks did correspond to known MoO3 phases (Fig. 9), and multiple phases are probably present.

Nitridation of oxide materials

The selected products of oxide syntheses that mainly produced well-formed nanowires or rods were nitrided. The initial nitridations, where the temperature was increased very quickly under NH3 flow (19, 20), did not have very good shape retention. However, when the temperature was slowly raised, the shape retention was significantly better, and it seemed to be important to dry out the starting oxide first at low relatively low temperatures prior to nitridation. This can be illustrated by comparing the results from 20 and 21. As seen in Figs. 10, 20 has a significant amount of fragmentation and fusion of the nanorods into tubes, and the shape retention of 21 is significantly better than 20 even though the particles are still somewhat fused together and slightly porous.

The powder patterns in Fig. 11 show that 20 was only partially nitrided, as it exhibits minor peaks for the rutile phase of TiO2 where 21 and 22 only showed peaks for TiN. This is probably the result of more nitridation time for 21 and 22. In general, the titanium oxides held their shape moderately well, with significant porosity and fusion of the individual rods or wires, and extensive fragmentation of thinner nanowires (Fig. 12e, f and Fig. 10). The thinnest TiO2 nanowires (11) did not retain their shape at all but instead broke up and coalesced into particles (23) on nitridation (Fig. 12g, h). As noted above, the nitridations of vanadium oxides were also overall more successful in shape retention when the temperature was slowly ramped up. The nitrided wires were porous, but the shape was more defined, especially in 25 (Fig. 12a–b). The vanadium nitrides 25 and 26 showed XRD peaks only for VN, while 24 still showed many peaks in the X-ray diffraction pattern for V2O3 (Fig. 13). Figure 12c, d also display that the molybdenum oxide nitridation product was extremely porous, almost to the point of falling apart. It still held its general shape, did not fuse together, and only shows XRD peaks for molybdenum nitrides (Fig. 13). The porous structures shown here resemble the general appearance of porous nitride structures reported by others from oxide nitridation, including Wang et al. 2015 and Lu et al. 2013.

In cases where the nitridation of any oxide was mostly complete, had reasonable shape retention, and sufficient yield, BET surface area data was taken (Table 4). With the exception of 26, in general, the surface area remained approximately the same between the oxide and nitride. This was most likely due to the nanowires fusing together but becoming more porous, thus resulting in a similar overall surface area. The case of 14A and 25 where the surface area greatly decreased from the oxide to the nitride is most likely due to the fact that the nitrided wires were not as porous as some of the other nitrides and still may have been fused or matted together.

Table 4 BET surface area data for samples 3 and 26, 10 and 22, 14A and 25, and 16 and 27

For reactions where the nitridation was at least moderately successful in shape retention of the wires, UV-Vis and near IR data were taken in ethanol dispersions to identify the plasmon band (Fig. 14). Neither of the vanadium nitrides (25, 26) nor TiN samples 21 and 22 displayed a significant plasmon band, but this could have been because they did not stay suspended in ethanol well and were highly agglomerated. No significant absorption maxima were observed for the nanowires at longer wavelengths. Nanomaterials 19 and 20 did show the characteristic plasmon band for TiN around a wavelength of 800 to 900 nm. We did not see any shift of the plasmon bands to near-infrared wavelengths due to geometry as all the spectra are consistent with the previously reported optical spectra of low aspect ratio nanoparticles (Patsalas et al. 2015; Barragan et al. 2017; Ishii et al. 2016; Guler et al. 2015; Divya et al. 2014).

Two-point bulk electrical measurements were done by pressing the nitride powders between 2 metal rods in a quartz tube, which were used as electrodes. Bulk densities of packed powders were far below the theoretical density of the nitride materials (~ 6 g/cm3), as lots of empty space exists between the particles. The nitride powders made from acidic hydrothermally produced oxides all show metallic conductivity, as expected (Table 5). However, both of the nitride materials (22 and 23) prepared from the alkaline hydrothermal synthesized oxides (10 and 11) showed semiconductivity, very high capacitance (high effective dielectric constants), and high dissipation factors. The most likely reason for this behavior is incomplete conversion to nitride, leaving thin layers of dielectric material coating the nitride crystallites. The X-ray diffraction patterns of these two materials show small extra peaks between 12 and 40.5° that most closely matches Na2TiO3 (Fig. 11). Also, the Raman spectra (supporting information) show extra peaks in 22 and 23 that are not present in the other TiN samples. The precursor material 11 also shows high dielectric constants with even higher dissipation factors, probably a result of the OH groups in the material. Nitride and oxide nanowire films on electrodes have been used in electrochemical capacitors (Liu et al. 2016; Dhananjaya et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2020), and this result demonstrates the possibility of these materials being used for dry capacitor technology as well.

Table 5 Resistivity, dielectric constant, and dissipation factor measurements on nitride products

Conclusions

Nanowires and nanorods of Ti, V, and Mo oxides are readily grown under acidic hydrothermal conditions. While some elemental substitution of these metals does occur within the oxide structures when mixtures of metals are present in solution, the amount of substitution appears to be minimal. Nanoparticles of the oxides of Ti, V, Mo, and W are readily converted to their respective nitrides by heating under flowing NH3 up to 900 °C. Maximum shape retention for high aspect ratio nanostructures (nanowires) is best achieved by dehydration below 200 °C followed by slowly increasing the nitridation temperature. With V and Mo, a general feature of such nitrided nanowires is porosity, and with Ti fusion and fragmentation of the nanowires was observed, and most prominent with the thinnest nanowires. The most intact, although porous, nitride nanowires were produced from vanadium pentoxide nanowires that had a small amount of titanium present, and these nanowires showed metallic conductivity. These results should enable methods of inexpensive bulk production of conductive nanowires for a wide variety of technologies, even if the high porosity precludes applications that require fully consolidated nanowires.